Equity Bottom-Up

Brief Equities Bottom-Up: Organo (6368 JP): Company Visit Notes and Conclusions and more

In this briefing:

  1. Organo (6368 JP): Company Visit Notes and Conclusions
  2. Las Vegas Sands: Singapore Expansion Impacts Our Valuation Now, Long Before Projected 2025 Debut
  3. Guangzhou Rural: All the Shakespearoes?
  4. ICBC: Opportunity in Disguise
  5. Shanghai/Shenzhen Connect – Inflow Turned Cautious in March but MSCI Adjustment Ahead

1. Organo (6368 JP): Company Visit Notes and Conclusions

Screen%20shot%202019 04 07%20at%2010.38.13

  • Organo has rebounded from December’s sharp sell-off, but remains attractively valued on a long-term view, in our estimation. 
  • New orders for water treatment systems from the semiconductor and other industries were up 22% year-on-year and exceeded sales by 33% in the nine months to December.
  • According to management, orders continued to exceed sales in the three months to March, but are likely to drop below sales in 1H of FY Mar-20 due to the downturn in memory ICs.
  • But the situation is not dire, as overall silicon wafer shipments and demand for image sensors both continue to rise, while foundry is doing better than memory.
  • Longer term, management expects growth driven by IIoT, power devices,  electric vehicles, and a cyclical recovery in memory. The biggest uncertainty is Chinese domestic demand.
  • Some orders have been deferred by one or two quarters, but the company has so far not suffered any cancellations. With a one-year lag from order to revenue recognition for larger projects, management believes it has sufficient visibility to predict improvement in 2H.
  • Management has no plans to revise FY Mar-19 guidance, which is for a 14.9% increase in sales, a 43.9% increase in operating profit and a 33.1% increase in net profit to ¥322.5 per share. At ¥3,200 (Friday, April 5 closing price), this translates into a P/E ratio of 9.9x.
  • In our estimation, this is cheap enough to be of interest to long-term investors. In the meantime, the calculations of Japan Analytics show upside to a no-growth valuation. Little or no growth appears to be the most likely scenario for FY Mar-20.
  • Organo is Japan’s second-ranking industrial water treatment company after Kurita Water Industries (6370). Both provide ultra-pure water processing equipment and related products and services to the semiconductor industry. Kurita ranks first in Japan and Korea, Organo ranks first in Taiwan, and both companies compete in China.

2. Las Vegas Sands: Singapore Expansion Impacts Our Valuation Now, Long Before Projected 2025 Debut

Stb tourism receipts 2018

  • LVS at $64 has runway to $80 by Q4 this year with more core catalysts than many peers.
  • Just announced Singapore expansion solidifies LVS first mover MICE advantage as developer of choice in other jurisdictions.
  • Singapore outlook adds credibility to LVS pole position in race for Japan IR license before year’s end, adding ballast to our PT.

3. Guangzhou Rural: All the Shakespearoes?

I am partial to a bit of Confucius. Or to such thinking. Now and again. The chairman of Guangzhou Rural Commercial Bank (1551 HK) has a Confucian message (scholars will no doubt berate me) at the beginning of the report and accounts: “A single spark can start a prairie fire while a crack can lead to ice breaking”. From what I can glean, the chairman is alluding to the forty year process of China’s emergence. No satanic conflagration intended or any portends of global warming. For some reason, a tune by the 1970s new-wave group, The Stranglers, passed through my mind: “He got an ice pick that made his ears burn” and “They watched their Rome burn”. Cultural differences perhaps.

Guangzhou Rural Commercial Bank (1551 HK) shares many of the issues that affect Chinese lenders today.  (The “Big four” are much less susceptible to deep stresses in this environment). Unsurprisingly, Asset Quality issues weigh on these results and earnings quality is subpar with trading gains and other assorted non-operating or “other items” playing a big part in the composition of Pre-Tax Profit. The latter flatters the “improving” headline Cost-Income ratio which is not really an indicator of greater efficiency here. In fact underlying “jaws” are highly negative. It is thus surprising that the wage bill should shoot up 30% YoY in such austere times. Given the aforementioned Asset Quality issues, such as booming substandard loans, ballooning credit costs, and high charge-offs, the “improving” NPL ratio is flattered by an exuberant denominator. Asset Quality does look volatile. The Liquidity Coverage Ratio and LDR duly eroded.

Where the bank does better, in contrast to many other Chinese lenders, is on Net Interest Income.  Guangzhou seems to have reduced its funding costs markedly. The bank managed to lower its corporate time deposit rates especially. The result is that Interest Expenses on Deposits rose by just 6.4% YoY. Liability management seems to be behind a reduction in Debt/Equity from 2.79x to 1.62x, thus decreasing Debt funding costs by 24% YoY. Spurred by corporate credit growth of 38% YoY, Interest Income on Loans climbed by 31% YoY. However, the bank does share an issue with some other lenders – a collapse in Interest Income on non-credit earning assets. This is, in part, due to a shrinkage of its FI holdings by some CN89.5bn. This means that despite the credit spurt, Interest Income in its totality edged up by barely 1% YoY. A disappointing performance on fee income (custody, wealth management, advisory) reduced Total underlying Income growth to 6% YoY. That 6% is all about rampant corporate credit supply and lower corporate deposit and debt interest costs.

Trends are thus decidedly mixed given the underlying picture behind the positive headline fundamental change in Efficiency, Asset Quality and ROAA. Liquidity deteriorated. It must be said that Provisioning was enhanced, Capitalisation moved in the right direction, while NIM and Interest Spread both improved.

Shares are trading at optically quite tempting levels: Earnings Yield of 17%, P/Book of 0.8x, and FV of 8%. But if you desire a Dividend Yield of 5%, or a similar level of aforementioned valuation, a safer bet would be with “The Big Four”.

4. ICBC: Opportunity in Disguise

ICBC (H) (1398 HK) delivered a robust PH Score of 8.5 – our quantamental value-quality gauge.

A highlight was the trend in cost-control. The bank delivered underlying “jaws” of 420bps. Besides OPEX restraint, including payroll, Efficiency gains were supported by robust underlying top-line expansion as  growth in interest income on earning assets, underpinned by moderate credit growth, broadly matched expansion of interest expenses on interest-bearing Liabilities. This combination is not so prevalent in China these days, especially in smaller or medium-sized lenders.

It is well-flagged that the system is grappling with Asset Quality issues and there is a debate about the interrelated property market. ICBC is not immune, similar to other SOEs, from migration of souring loans. However, by China standards, rising asset writedowns which exerted a negative pull on Pre-Tax Profit as a % of pre-impairment Operating Profit, high charge-offs, and swelling (though not exploding) substandard and loss loans look arguably manageable given ICBC‘s sheer scale. The Asset Quality issue here is also not as bad as it was in bygone years (2004 springs to mind) when capital injections, asset transfers, and government-subsidised bad loan disposals were the order of the day. This is a “Big Four” player.

Shares are not expensive. ICBC trades at a P/Book of 0.8x, a Franchise Valuation of 10%, an Earnings Yield of 16.7%, a Dividend Yield of 4.9%, and a Total Return Ratio of 1.6x.

5. Shanghai/Shenzhen Connect – Inflow Turned Cautious in March but MSCI Adjustment Ahead

Foreign%20holdings%20breakdown

In our Discover SZ/SH Connect series, we aim to help our investors understand the flow of northbound trades via the Shanghai Connect and Shenzhen Connect, as analyzed by our proprietary data engine. We will discuss the stocks that experienced the most inflow and outflow by offshore investors in the past seven days.

We split the stocks eligible for the northbound trade into three groups: those with a market capitalization of above USD 5 billion, and those with a market capitalization between USD 1 billion and USD 5 billion.

We note that in March, northbound inflows turned more cautious vs strong inflows in February (link to our Feb note) and January (link to our Jan note). Nevertheless we see strong inflows into Healthcare sector, led by Jiangsu Hengrui Medicine Co., (600276 CH). We also highlight Universal Scientific Industrial Shanghai (601231 CH 环旭电子) in the mid cap space that attracted strong northbound inflows.

Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma

Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.