Brief Equities Bottom-Up: Dali Foods (3799:HK) FY18 Results: Revenue Growth Collapses in H2, But Margins Hold Up So Far and more

In this briefing:

1. Dali Foods (3799:HK) FY18 Results: Revenue Growth Collapses in H2, But Margins Hold Up So Far
2. Ping An Bank: Not Cheap Enough
3. Samsung Electronics Voluntary Red Flag on 1Q Earnings
4. China Zheshang Bank – A Look Beyond Doubling Impairment Costs
5. China Mobile 4Q18 Trends Improved Slightly. It Remains Most Exposed to 5G Capex Uncertainty.

1. Dali Foods (3799:HK) FY18 Results: Revenue Growth Collapses in H2, But Margins Hold Up So Far

We launched coverage of Dali Foods Group (3799 HK) in February with a Sell rating and a HK$4.18 target price. FY18 financial results, which were released late Tuesday March 26th, appear to confirm at least half of our negative thesis (slowing revenue growth), though the other half (margin compression) has failed to materialize so far.

Dali Foods appears to have met — just — the FY18 consensus EPS target of HK$0.307 per share. The company cut its Final dividend from HK$0.10 to HK$0.075 per share. 

However, the pace of revenue growth plummeted in H218. From solid growth of +11.4% YoY in H118, H218 revenues actually declined by -0.6% YoY in the latter half of the year. This result was beyond even our pessimistic view and we believe bulls on the company will be forced to revisit their overly optimistic assumptions about double-digit revenue growth in 2019e.

Besides assuming slower revenue growth going forward, the other leg of our negative thesis on Dali Foods was the expectation of margin compression due to rising raw materials costs, specifically for paper and key food and beverage ingredients. Although H218 gross margin declined versus H217 (to 37.7% from 37.8%), it did so only marginally, and probably due to a change in product mix (ie, a decline in high-margin beverage sales). 

After reviewing FY and H218 results, we see no reasons to change our negative view of Dali Foods, and our HK$4.18 price target (-26% potential downside) and Sell rating remain unchanged.

2. Ping An Bank: Not Cheap Enough

Ping An Bank Co Ltd A (000001 CH) results show gradual erosion in fundamental trends. We believe that positive fundamental momentum (within our quantamental approach) leads to higher stock prices.

Behind the headline numbers, there lies an acute rise in funding costs in excess of the growth in interest income on earnings assets. As elsewhere in China, there is a festering asset quality issue too. While not as toxic versus diverse peers, it is notable: the impaired asset portfolio more than doubled YoY.

Valuations are not especially cheap relative to the region (including Japan). Franchise Valuation at 10% and P/Book of 0.94x are at a premium to the regional medians of 8% and 0.77x, respectively. The Total Return Ratio is <1x.

In conclusion, we do not see a lot that has changed for the better at Ping An Bank (funding, liquidity, efficiency, profitability and asset quality) though the headline deterioration is not so drastic. Underlying concerns lie with core interest income generation given sky-high funding expenses and pervasive asset quality issues.

3. Samsung Electronics Voluntary Red Flag on 1Q Earnings

• SamE voluntarily red flagged its 1Q19 earnings even before 1Q ends. SamE mentioned two things: 1. Falling memory chip prices and 2. slowing demand for display panels. Given the ‘usual’ profit size of DP business, this should be all about memory chips, specifically server DRAM.
• Memory chip price falling should not be enough to explain this much 1Q profit loss. It must be that SamE has decided to reflect huge inventory losses and pay bills from Amazon and Google on the book in this first quarter. Of course, SamE wouldn’t want to talk about this explicitly.
• SamE shares aren’t reacting to this a lot right now. It is mainly because local street already heavily adjusted 1Q OP to as low as ₩6.5~7tril. This 1Q earnings shock factor must have been already reflected into the price. Even below ₩6tril level wouldn’t be taken as a huge surprise.
• SamE said last month that memory sales would be revived starting 2H this year. I think this is still a valid and crucial point. This suggests that server DRAM demand from Amazon and Google will likely be back starting 3Q19. This means SamE is confident that it can handle the server DRAM optimization issue by then.
• I’m still sticking to my previous OP forecast for FY19. It should be ₩8tril more than the current street consensus. At this, SamE Common is trading at a 8.73x PER. SamE is scheduled to deliver 1Q19 interim numbers next week on Apr 5.

4. China Zheshang Bank – A Look Beyond Doubling Impairment Costs

It should be no surprise to see China Zheshang Bank (2016 HK; “CZB”) reveal a dramatic rise of impairment costs in 4Q18. It is one of only few China banks to yet announced quarterly results, and here it reported profit at -12% YoY in 4Q18.  The doubling of impairment costs in the period goes to our long-standing concerns of continued credit tdeterioration in China and well more than headline figures suggest. This is partly based on our China corporate analysis of interest cover and debt/ebitda, which remain weak. It is also notable that CZB has been one of the faster growing banks in the country, putting its ‘unseasoned’ loans higher than many others; where we believe these banks are more likely to see higher impairment costs. Perhaps that is now coming through? And with RMB250bn of write-offs in December 2018 for China’s bank system, this suggests there will have to sizeable impairment costs to replenish balance sheet provisions.

5. China Mobile 4Q18 Trends Improved Slightly. It Remains Most Exposed to 5G Capex Uncertainty.

Chris Hoare downgraded China Mobile (941 HK) some time ago on rising concerns that 5G capex would be higher than expected. While China Unicom (762 HK) and China Telecom (728 HK) both laid out very modest 2019 5G capex plans, China Mobile did not.  And despite what we saw as reasonable results, earnings guidance was weak and the lack of a rising dividend payout suggests internal concerns over 5G spending.  We had seen China Mobile as a defensive stock, but recent strong performance and rising 5G worries led us to downgrade our recommendation. It remains at Reduce with a HK$75 target.