Value Investing

In this briefing:

1. Indonesia Property – In Search of the End of the Rainbow – Part 4 – Alam Sutera Realty (ASRI IJ)
2. When Job ‘Quality’ Prevailed over ‘Headcount’
3. Eurobank: Battle-Hardened and Transformation Bound
4. Krung Thai Bank: Not as Cheap as It Looks

1. Indonesia Property – In Search of the End of the Rainbow – Part 4 – Alam Sutera Realty (ASRI IJ)

In this series under Smartkarma Originals, CrossASEAN insight providers AngusMackintosh and Jessica Irene seek to determine whether or not we are close to the end of the rainbow and to a period of outperformance for the property sector. Our end conclusions will be based on a series of company visits to the major listed property companies in Indonesia, conversations with local banks, property agents, and other relevant channel checks. 

The fourth company that we explore is township developer Alam Sutera Realty (ASRI IJ), which provides an interesting exposure to a mix of landed housing, high-rise and low-rise condominiums through its Alam Sutera Township near Serpong and its Pasir Kemis township 15 km further out on the toll road. 

Given the diminishing area of high-value land bank in Alam Sutera, the company has shifted emphasis towards selling low-rise condominiums and commercial lots for shop houses, which has been a success story. 

Alam Sutera Realty (ASRI IJ) also has a contract with a Chinese developer, China Fortune Land Development (CFLD), to develop a total of 500 ha over a five year period in its Pasir Kamis Township.  This has provided a fillip for the company during a quiet period of marketing sales and will continue to underpin earnings for the next 2 years.

The company stands to benefit from the completion of two new toll-roads, one soon to be completed to the south connecting directly to BSD City and longer term a new toll to Soekarno Hatta Airport to the north.

It will start to utilise new land bank in North Serpong in 2021, which will extend the development potential in the area significantly longer-term. 

Management is optimistic about marketing sales for 2019 and expects growth of +16% versus last year’s number, which already exceeded expectations.

Alam Sutera Realty (ASRI IJ) has less recurrent income than peers at around 10% of total revenue but has the potential to see better contributions from the Garuda Wisnu Kencana Cultural Centre (GWK) in Bali. 

The new regulations on the booking of sales financed by mortgages introduced in August 2018 will benefit Alam Sutera Realty (ASRI IJ) from a cash flow perspective. Given that the company is consistently producing free cash flow, this is also a strong deleveraging story.

One of the biggest risks for the company is its US$ debt, which totals US$480m and is made up of two bonds expiring in 2020 and 2022. 

From a valuation perspective, Alam Sutera Realty (ASRI IJ) looks very interesting, trading on 4.9x FY19E PER, at 0.67x PBV, and at a 71% discount to NAV. On all three measures, at 1 STD below its historical mean. Our target price of IDR600 takes a blended approach, based on the company trading at historical mean on all three measures implies upside of 91% from current levels. Catalysts include better marketing sales from its low-rise developments at its Alam Sutera township and further cluster sales there, a pick-up in sales and pricing at its Pasir Kemis township, a sale of its office inventory at The Tower, a pick up in recurrent income driven by improving tenant mix at GWK. Given that the company has high levels of US$ debt, a stable currency will also benefit the company. A more dovish outlook on interest rates will also be a positive, given a large and rising portion of buyers use a mortgage to buy its properties. 

2. When Job ‘Quality’ Prevailed over ‘Headcount’

• A 387k decline in employment didn’t weigh on the jobless rate of 5.2% according to the latest labor survey data. As the labor participation rate declined in 4Q18, roughly 2.1mn of those in the labor pool voluntarily passed up the job search, to ease any employment demand-supply mismatch.

• For those employed particularly in the non-farm, production sectors led by manufacturing and construction, the quality of jobs generated dominated the lack of headcount gains in determining incomes, if not, uplifting purchasing power. If we exclude direct government job creation from the labor stats, we obtain a non-farm, private job creation of 1.1mn (vs 3Q18: -8.6k) up 3.8%YoY. Average weekly work hours were 43.2 versus 40.6 a year-ago suggesting more overtime work. Salaried workers grew by 1.4mn (+5.6%YoY) employed mainly from private establishments. Underemployment fell to 15.6% in the latest job survey vs 18% a year-ago.

• As inflation recedes, the robust non-farm employment and better job quality won’t be compelling for policymakers to rush any form of monetary accommodation. Since the jobs data or GDP prospects are not as vulnerable to sharp downswings due to onshore catalysts, e.g., upbeat public investments, consumption recovery, despite a less-than-encouraging global backdrop, the Central Bank may focus on possible risk of a liquidity crunch and emergence of positive, real interest rates in determining the policy options for monetary accommodation this year.

3. Eurobank: Battle-Hardened and Transformation Bound

Eurobank Ergasias Sa (EUROB GA) FY18 results were satisfactory. The bank is now weaned off ELA, pays a tax rate of 33% for the first time in many years, generates robust deposit inflows, enhancing the liquidity position, and is actively reducing NPEs. Management foresees the current problem loan ratio at 37.1% easing to 16% in 2019 and 9% by 2021. Problem exposures will be slashed by €10bn in 2019 through securitizations, collateral liquidations, sales, recoveries and charge-offs. Recent data show a much more benign situation regarding negative NPE formation. The worst seems to be behind the Greek Banking System, barring some external global or regional event or domestic policy misstep.

The legal framework for banks has improved with the Katseli Law providing lenders with greater protection for recovering mortgage NPE foreclosures in the event of default on restructured loans. The real estate auction system has also been gaining much greater traction.

Eurobank is engaged in a corporate transformation plan in order to unlock value, improve capitalisation, and manage NPEs. The plan revolves around a merger with Grivalia, “Pillar” (€2bn mortgage NPE securitization), “Cairo” (€7.5bn multi-asset securitization), the creation of a loan servicer, and a hive down. The bank will focus on core banking rather than functioning as a distressed real estate asset manager.

The outlook for the Greek economy has improved somewhat. The 2019 Budget is based on a primary surplus target of 3.5% of GDP. Exports and private consumption are drivers for solid growth of around 2%. The cash buffer of at least EUR26.5 bn is equivalent to 2 years of gross financing needs. Moody’s raised Greece’s issuer rating to B1 from B3 and its outlook to stable from positive (Feb19). The sovereign gained market access with recent 5year €2.5bn and 10year €2.5bn issues. A tailwind will be the resurgence of “animal spirits” under a New Democracy administration after elections later this year.

4. Krung Thai Bank: Not as Cheap as It Looks

Originally, Krung Thai Bank Pub (KTB TB) struck us as interesting. A solid PH Score™, reasonable franchise valuation and P/Book, and a low RSI.

However, further due-diligence shows a somewhat stagnant and eroding operation.

• Headline profitability improvement is unrelated to efficiency or to operational advances.
• Cost growth is fast outpacing a declining top-line.
• Interest income has actually fallen for each of the last 3 years.
• The bank is being squeezed on margin despite keeping interest expenses unchanged.
• Non-interest expenses soared by 26% YoY.
• The bottom line (and profitability) was flattered by varied low quality items as well as much lower loan loss provisions, but still remained well above comprehensive income.
• Asset Quality is also concerning (despite lower loan loss provisions) given the sharp rise in loss (especially) and substandard loans as well as the amount of Special Mention Loans on the Balance Sheet. This means provisioning of problem loans may not be sufficient.
• Liquidity: Deposits are also declining, pushing up the LDR.

In this briefing:

1. Agricultural Bank of China: It Takes More than One Cold Day for a River to Freeze a Meter Deep.
2. Japan 5G Spectrum Allocations In-Line With Expectations
3. China Minsheng: Unless There Is Opposing Wind, a Kite Cannot Rise.
4. Taiwan Business Bank: Catching the Sun’s Rays
5. Indonesia Property-In Search of the End of the Rainbow- Part 7 – Kawasan Industri Jababeka (KIJA IJ)

1. Agricultural Bank of China: It Takes More than One Cold Day for a River to Freeze a Meter Deep.

Agricultural Bank Of China (1288 HK) reported stolid numbers for 2018. A PH Score of 7.6 encapsulates positive change in variables such as Capitalisation, Asset Quality, Margin, Efficiency, and Provisioning though Profitability and Liquidity gauges slipped somewhat. The attractive valuation variable contributes to the score.

Underlying top-line growth of 8%, supported by low double-digit credit growth from moderate deposit expansion, was matched by OPEX increment.

The increase in Interest Income on earning Assets was relatively synchronised to the rise in Interest Expenses on interest-bearing Liabilities. 

We mention this as too often in China of late we have seen OPEX growth far outstripping underlying Income gains and Funding cost expansion rise well in excess of Interest Income growth.

Asset Quality was quite stable. Despite lingering SMLs and a double-digit rise in substandard Loans, NPLs actually decreased YoY. The bank though boosted Loan Loss Provisions by 40% YoY and Loan Loss reserve ratios were tightened. A monumental increase in Loan recoveries generated net negative charge-offs. This shows that the bank is pulling no punches with debtors.

Capitalisation ratios were fortified.

A concern would be the increased exposure to CRE which accounts for 31% of the Loan portfolio. This is the greatest risk in the grand scheme of things and has generated much comment given real estate values and the pace of appreciation. (Is a 5-6x increase since the creation of a private market so elevated? Prices are still well below levels of India).

2. Japan 5G Spectrum Allocations In-Line With Expectations

The Ministry of Industry Affairs and Communications (MIC, the regulator) announced 5G spectrum allocations today with KDDI and NTT DoCoMo securing three bands and Rakuten and Softbank two, in line with one of the two expected scenarios we discussed last month.  This dramatically expands the spectrum portfolio for the industry and sets the stage for the deployment of 5G services in later this year and in 2020. We think all operators benefit although sentiment may favor Rakuten for receiving two more bands and KDDI/DoCoMo for receiving the highest allocations. 

3. China Minsheng: Unless There Is Opposing Wind, a Kite Cannot Rise.

Profitability at China Minsheng Banking A (600016 CH) in 2018 slipped. Similar to other Chinese lenders, rising Loan Loss Provisions exerted a negative pull on the bottom-line, testament to gnawing Asset Quality issues. In addition, similar to some banks, the top-line came under pressure from the rising cost of source of funding. Also the bank was not alone in juicing up its bottom-line with hefty trading gains. Thus Earnings Quality could have been better.

Given the underlying squeeze on core Income, it was encouraging to see management at least restrain OPEX.

Regarding Asset quality, write-offs soared by 153% YoY while substandard and loss Loans jumped by 68% YoY and 14%, respectively, and Loan Loss Provisions rose by 35.6% YoY. It is perhaps a little surprising then that coverage ratios decreased given the trend in credit costs, NPL migration, and charge-offs.

LDR remains quite high though credit growth last year was not gung-ho and broadly in line with Deposit expansion. We do note though a ratcheting up of CRE lending which jumped from 8.8% of the total Loan book to 12.3%.

4. Taiwan Business Bank: Catching the Sun’s Rays

Taiwan Business Bank (2834 TT) ticks most of the boxes with a PH Score of 10. This is a top decile performance globally in terms of fundamental trends from our quantamental value-quality gauge.

We would caution that the asset quality is not as crystalline as the reduced NPL ratio indicates given that rising impaired loans represent 5x NPLs. We await greater granularity from further analysis of the NPL breakdown by category. Having said that, the impaired loan ratio is still pretty low and manageable at 1.48% while Provisioning -on an upward trend- should reflect increasing non-NPL but impaired assets.

Results were markedly impacted by a palpable reduction in Loan Loss Provisions which will be a response, we assume, to lower problem loans or NPLs as well as very strong recoveries (net negative charge-offs), rather than higher impaired Loans.

In addition, the trend in Efficiency may not be as good as it appears to be given that OPEX expansion outpaced “Underlying Income” expansion. The latter was impacted by a sharp increase in Interest Expenses from Deposits especially, as well as a tepid Fee Income performance. While Interest Income from non-credit assets rose robustly, the core Interest Income on Loans firmed by 11.4% YoY, for a YoY gain of NT2.3bn, despite a modest decrease in the Loan portfolio in such a low margin environment. Interestingly, Loan recoveries also saw a NT2.3bn gain.

Valuation is quite appealing given the tailwinds of a high PH Score. FV, P/Book, and Earnings Yield stand at 6%, 0.9x, and 10%, respectively.

5. Indonesia Property-In Search of the End of the Rainbow- Part 7 – Kawasan Industri Jababeka (KIJA IJ)

In this series under Smartkarma Originals, CrossASEAN insight providers AngusMackintosh and Jessica Irene seek to determine whether or not we are close to the end of the rainbow and to a period of outperformance for the property sector. Our end conclusions will be based on a series of company visits to the major listed property companies in Indonesia, conversations with local banks, property agents, and other relevant channel checks. 

In the seventh company in ongoing Smartkarma Originals series on the property space in Indonesia, we now look at Indonesia’s oldest Industrial Estate developer and operator Kawasan Industri Jababeka (KIJA IJ). The company’s largest and the original estate is in Cikarang to the East of Jakarta and comprises 1,239 hectares of industrial land bank and a masterplan of 5,600 ha. 

It has a blue chip customer base both local and foreign at Cikarang including Unilever Indonesia (UNVR IJ), Samsung Electronics (005930 KS), as well as a number of Japanese automakers and their related suppliers.

The company has also expanded its presence to Kendal, close to Semarang in Central Java, where it has a joint venture with Singapore listed company Sembcorp Industries (SCI SP). This estate covers a total area of 2,700 ha to be developed in three phases over a period of 25 years and is focused on manufacturing in industries.

The company also has successfully installed a 140 MW gas-fired power station at its Cikarang, providing a recurrent stream utility-type earnings, which cushion against the volatility in its industrial estate and property earnings. After some issues with one of its boilers (non-recurrent) and issues early last year with PLN, this asset now looks set to provide a stable earnings stream for the company.

KIJA has also built a dry-port at Cikarang estate which has been increasing throughput by around +25% every year, providing its customers with the facility for customs clearance at a faster pace of that at the Tanjong Priok port, as well as logistics support. 

After two difficult years where the company has been hit by a combination of problems at its power plant, foreign exchange write-downs, and slower demand for industrial plots, the company now looks set to see a strong recovery in earnings in 2019 and beyond.

The company has seen coverage from equity analysts dwindle, which means there are no consensus estimates but it looks attractive from both a PBV and an NAV basis trading on 0.85x FY19E PBV and at a 73% discount to NAV. If the company were to trade back to its historical mean from a PBV and PER point of view, this would imply an upside of 33% to IDR325, using a blend of the two measures. An absence of one-off charges in 2019 and a pick up in industrial sales should mean a significant recovery in earnings, putting the company on an FY19E PER multiple of 9.7x, which is by no means expensive given its strategic positioning and given that this is a recovery story. 

In this briefing:

1. When Job ‘Quality’ Prevailed over ‘Headcount’
2. Eurobank: Battle-Hardened and Transformation Bound
3. Krung Thai Bank: Not as Cheap as It Looks
4. Chiyoda: Minor Updates About the Major Capital Infusion, Cost Overruns and Upcoming Orders

1. When Job ‘Quality’ Prevailed over ‘Headcount’

• A 387k decline in employment didn’t weigh on the jobless rate of 5.2% according to the latest labor survey data. As the labor participation rate declined in 4Q18, roughly 2.1mn of those in the labor pool voluntarily passed up the job search, to ease any employment demand-supply mismatch.

• For those employed particularly in the non-farm, production sectors led by manufacturing and construction, the quality of jobs generated dominated the lack of headcount gains in determining incomes, if not, uplifting purchasing power. If we exclude direct government job creation from the labor stats, we obtain a non-farm, private job creation of 1.1mn (vs 3Q18: -8.6k) up 3.8%YoY. Average weekly work hours were 43.2 versus 40.6 a year-ago suggesting more overtime work. Salaried workers grew by 1.4mn (+5.6%YoY) employed mainly from private establishments. Underemployment fell to 15.6% in the latest job survey vs 18% a year-ago.

• As inflation recedes, the robust non-farm employment and better job quality won’t be compelling for policymakers to rush any form of monetary accommodation. Since the jobs data or GDP prospects are not as vulnerable to sharp downswings due to onshore catalysts, e.g., upbeat public investments, consumption recovery, despite a less-than-encouraging global backdrop, the Central Bank may focus on possible risk of a liquidity crunch and emergence of positive, real interest rates in determining the policy options for monetary accommodation this year.

2. Eurobank: Battle-Hardened and Transformation Bound

Eurobank Ergasias Sa (EUROB GA) FY18 results were satisfactory. The bank is now weaned off ELA, pays a tax rate of 33% for the first time in many years, generates robust deposit inflows, enhancing the liquidity position, and is actively reducing NPEs. Management foresees the current problem loan ratio at 37.1% easing to 16% in 2019 and 9% by 2021. Problem exposures will be slashed by €10bn in 2019 through securitizations, collateral liquidations, sales, recoveries and charge-offs. Recent data show a much more benign situation regarding negative NPE formation. The worst seems to be behind the Greek Banking System, barring some external global or regional event or domestic policy misstep.

The legal framework for banks has improved with the Katseli Law providing lenders with greater protection for recovering mortgage NPE foreclosures in the event of default on restructured loans. The real estate auction system has also been gaining much greater traction.

Eurobank is engaged in a corporate transformation plan in order to unlock value, improve capitalisation, and manage NPEs. The plan revolves around a merger with Grivalia, “Pillar” (€2bn mortgage NPE securitization), “Cairo” (€7.5bn multi-asset securitization), the creation of a loan servicer, and a hive down. The bank will focus on core banking rather than functioning as a distressed real estate asset manager.

The outlook for the Greek economy has improved somewhat. The 2019 Budget is based on a primary surplus target of 3.5% of GDP. Exports and private consumption are drivers for solid growth of around 2%. The cash buffer of at least EUR26.5 bn is equivalent to 2 years of gross financing needs. Moody’s raised Greece’s issuer rating to B1 from B3 and its outlook to stable from positive (Feb19). The sovereign gained market access with recent 5year €2.5bn and 10year €2.5bn issues. A tailwind will be the resurgence of “animal spirits” under a New Democracy administration after elections later this year.

3. Krung Thai Bank: Not as Cheap as It Looks

Originally, Krung Thai Bank Pub (KTB TB) struck us as interesting. A solid PH Score™, reasonable franchise valuation and P/Book, and a low RSI.

However, further due-diligence shows a somewhat stagnant and eroding operation.

• Headline profitability improvement is unrelated to efficiency or to operational advances.
• Cost growth is fast outpacing a declining top-line.
• Interest income has actually fallen for each of the last 3 years.
• The bank is being squeezed on margin despite keeping interest expenses unchanged.
• Non-interest expenses soared by 26% YoY.
• The bottom line (and profitability) was flattered by varied low quality items as well as much lower loan loss provisions, but still remained well above comprehensive income.
• Asset Quality is also concerning (despite lower loan loss provisions) given the sharp rise in loss (especially) and substandard loans as well as the amount of Special Mention Loans on the Balance Sheet. This means provisioning of problem loans may not be sufficient.
• Liquidity: Deposits are also declining, pushing up the LDR.

4. Chiyoda: Minor Updates About the Major Capital Infusion, Cost Overruns and Upcoming Orders

The key point of interest for investors regarding Chiyoda Corp (6366 JP) continues to be details surrounding its upcoming capital raise. The company has, since early November when it incurred these losses, offered scant details regarding the structure of the capital raise, except to note that the components would include additional loans and equity from industrial partners and most likely, main shareholder Mitsubishi Corp (8058 JP).

We visited the company to gather as much information as possible on the potential structure of the capital increase and to update the order outlook and reasons for further cost overruns.

In this briefing:

1. Japan 5G Spectrum Allocations In-Line With Expectations
2. China Minsheng: Unless There Is Opposing Wind, a Kite Cannot Rise.
3. Taiwan Business Bank: Catching the Sun’s Rays
4. Indonesia Property-In Search of the End of the Rainbow- Part 7 – Kawasan Industri Jababeka (KIJA IJ)
5. Guangzhou Rural: All the Shakespearoes?

1. Japan 5G Spectrum Allocations In-Line With Expectations

The Ministry of Industry Affairs and Communications (MIC, the regulator) announced 5G spectrum allocations today with KDDI and NTT DoCoMo securing three bands and Rakuten and Softbank two, in line with one of the two expected scenarios we discussed last month.  This dramatically expands the spectrum portfolio for the industry and sets the stage for the deployment of 5G services in later this year and in 2020. We think all operators benefit although sentiment may favor Rakuten for receiving two more bands and KDDI/DoCoMo for receiving the highest allocations. 

2. China Minsheng: Unless There Is Opposing Wind, a Kite Cannot Rise.

Profitability at China Minsheng Banking A (600016 CH) in 2018 slipped. Similar to other Chinese lenders, rising Loan Loss Provisions exerted a negative pull on the bottom-line, testament to gnawing Asset Quality issues. In addition, similar to some banks, the top-line came under pressure from the rising cost of source of funding. Also the bank was not alone in juicing up its bottom-line with hefty trading gains. Thus Earnings Quality could have been better.

Given the underlying squeeze on core Income, it was encouraging to see management at least restrain OPEX.

Regarding Asset quality, write-offs soared by 153% YoY while substandard and loss Loans jumped by 68% YoY and 14%, respectively, and Loan Loss Provisions rose by 35.6% YoY. It is perhaps a little surprising then that coverage ratios decreased given the trend in credit costs, NPL migration, and charge-offs.

LDR remains quite high though credit growth last year was not gung-ho and broadly in line with Deposit expansion. We do note though a ratcheting up of CRE lending which jumped from 8.8% of the total Loan book to 12.3%.

3. Taiwan Business Bank: Catching the Sun’s Rays

Taiwan Business Bank (2834 TT) ticks most of the boxes with a PH Score of 10. This is a top decile performance globally in terms of fundamental trends from our quantamental value-quality gauge.

We would caution that the asset quality is not as crystalline as the reduced NPL ratio indicates given that rising impaired loans represent 5x NPLs. We await greater granularity from further analysis of the NPL breakdown by category. Having said that, the impaired loan ratio is still pretty low and manageable at 1.48% while Provisioning -on an upward trend- should reflect increasing non-NPL but impaired assets.

Results were markedly impacted by a palpable reduction in Loan Loss Provisions which will be a response, we assume, to lower problem loans or NPLs as well as very strong recoveries (net negative charge-offs), rather than higher impaired Loans.

In addition, the trend in Efficiency may not be as good as it appears to be given that OPEX expansion outpaced “Underlying Income” expansion. The latter was impacted by a sharp increase in Interest Expenses from Deposits especially, as well as a tepid Fee Income performance. While Interest Income from non-credit assets rose robustly, the core Interest Income on Loans firmed by 11.4% YoY, for a YoY gain of NT2.3bn, despite a modest decrease in the Loan portfolio in such a low margin environment. Interestingly, Loan recoveries also saw a NT2.3bn gain.

Valuation is quite appealing given the tailwinds of a high PH Score. FV, P/Book, and Earnings Yield stand at 6%, 0.9x, and 10%, respectively.

4. Indonesia Property-In Search of the End of the Rainbow- Part 7 – Kawasan Industri Jababeka (KIJA IJ)

In this series under Smartkarma Originals, CrossASEAN insight providers AngusMackintosh and Jessica Irene seek to determine whether or not we are close to the end of the rainbow and to a period of outperformance for the property sector. Our end conclusions will be based on a series of company visits to the major listed property companies in Indonesia, conversations with local banks, property agents, and other relevant channel checks. 

In the seventh company in ongoing Smartkarma Originals series on the property space in Indonesia, we now look at Indonesia’s oldest Industrial Estate developer and operator Kawasan Industri Jababeka (KIJA IJ). The company’s largest and the original estate is in Cikarang to the East of Jakarta and comprises 1,239 hectares of industrial land bank and a masterplan of 5,600 ha. 

It has a blue chip customer base both local and foreign at Cikarang including Unilever Indonesia (UNVR IJ), Samsung Electronics (005930 KS), as well as a number of Japanese automakers and their related suppliers.

The company has also expanded its presence to Kendal, close to Semarang in Central Java, where it has a joint venture with Singapore listed company Sembcorp Industries (SCI SP). This estate covers a total area of 2,700 ha to be developed in three phases over a period of 25 years and is focused on manufacturing in industries.

The company also has successfully installed a 140 MW gas-fired power station at its Cikarang, providing a recurrent stream utility-type earnings, which cushion against the volatility in its industrial estate and property earnings. After some issues with one of its boilers (non-recurrent) and issues early last year with PLN, this asset now looks set to provide a stable earnings stream for the company.

KIJA has also built a dry-port at Cikarang estate which has been increasing throughput by around +25% every year, providing its customers with the facility for customs clearance at a faster pace of that at the Tanjong Priok port, as well as logistics support. 

After two difficult years where the company has been hit by a combination of problems at its power plant, foreign exchange write-downs, and slower demand for industrial plots, the company now looks set to see a strong recovery in earnings in 2019 and beyond.

The company has seen coverage from equity analysts dwindle, which means there are no consensus estimates but it looks attractive from both a PBV and an NAV basis trading on 0.85x FY19E PBV and at a 73% discount to NAV. If the company were to trade back to its historical mean from a PBV and PER point of view, this would imply an upside of 33% to IDR325, using a blend of the two measures. An absence of one-off charges in 2019 and a pick up in industrial sales should mean a significant recovery in earnings, putting the company on an FY19E PER multiple of 9.7x, which is by no means expensive given its strategic positioning and given that this is a recovery story. 

5. Guangzhou Rural: All the Shakespearoes?

I am partial to a bit of Confucius. Or to such thinking. Now and again. The chairman of Guangzhou Rural Commercial Bank (1551 HK) has a Confucian message (scholars will no doubt berate me) at the beginning of the report and accounts: “A single spark can start a prairie fire while a crack can lead to ice breaking”. From what I can glean, the chairman is alluding to the forty year process of China’s emergence. No satanic conflagration intended or any portends of global warming. For some reason, a tune by the 1970s new-wave group, The Stranglers, passed through my mind: “He got an ice pick that made his ears burn” and “They watched their Rome burn”. Cultural differences perhaps.

Guangzhou Rural Commercial Bank (1551 HK) shares many of the issues that affect Chinese lenders today.  (The “Big four” are much less susceptible to deep stresses in this environment). Unsurprisingly, Asset Quality issues weigh on these results and earnings quality is subpar with trading gains and other assorted non-operating or “other items” playing a big part in the composition of Pre-Tax Profit. The latter flatters the “improving” headline Cost-Income ratio which is not really an indicator of greater efficiency here. In fact underlying “jaws” are highly negative. It is thus surprising that the wage bill should shoot up 30% YoY in such austere times. Given the aforementioned Asset Quality issues, such as booming substandard loans, ballooning credit costs, and high charge-offs, the “improving” NPL ratio is flattered by an exuberant denominator. Asset Quality does look volatile. The Liquidity Coverage Ratio and LDR duly eroded.

Where the bank does better, in contrast to many other Chinese lenders, is on Net Interest Income.  Guangzhou seems to have reduced its funding costs markedly. The bank managed to lower its corporate time deposit rates especially. The result is that Interest Expenses on Deposits rose by just 6.4% YoY. Liability management seems to be behind a reduction in Debt/Equity from 2.79x to 1.62x, thus decreasing Debt funding costs by 24% YoY. Spurred by corporate credit growth of 38% YoY, Interest Income on Loans climbed by 31% YoY. However, the bank does share an issue with some other lenders – a collapse in Interest Income on non-credit earning assets. This is, in part, due to a shrinkage of its FI holdings by some CN89.5bn. This means that despite the credit spurt, Interest Income in its totality edged up by barely 1% YoY. A disappointing performance on fee income (custody, wealth management, advisory) reduced Total underlying Income growth to 6% YoY. That 6% is all about rampant corporate credit supply and lower corporate deposit and debt interest costs.

Trends are thus decidedly mixed given the underlying picture behind the positive headline fundamental change in Efficiency, Asset Quality and ROAA. Liquidity deteriorated. It must be said that Provisioning was enhanced, Capitalisation moved in the right direction, while NIM and Interest Spread both improved.

In this briefing:

1. Eurobank: Battle-Hardened and Transformation Bound
2. Krung Thai Bank: Not as Cheap as It Looks
3. Chiyoda: Minor Updates About the Major Capital Infusion, Cost Overruns and Upcoming Orders
4. Geo Energy (GERL SP): Recovery in Coal Price from 4Q18 Bottom; Continue to Wait for M&A Action

1. Eurobank: Battle-Hardened and Transformation Bound

Eurobank Ergasias Sa (EUROB GA) FY18 results were satisfactory. The bank is now weaned off ELA, pays a tax rate of 33% for the first time in many years, generates robust deposit inflows, enhancing the liquidity position, and is actively reducing NPEs. Management foresees the current problem loan ratio at 37.1% easing to 16% in 2019 and 9% by 2021. Problem exposures will be slashed by €10bn in 2019 through securitizations, collateral liquidations, sales, recoveries and charge-offs. Recent data show a much more benign situation regarding negative NPE formation. The worst seems to be behind the Greek Banking System, barring some external global or regional event or domestic policy misstep.

The legal framework for banks has improved with the Katseli Law providing lenders with greater protection for recovering mortgage NPE foreclosures in the event of default on restructured loans. The real estate auction system has also been gaining much greater traction.

Eurobank is engaged in a corporate transformation plan in order to unlock value, improve capitalisation, and manage NPEs. The plan revolves around a merger with Grivalia, “Pillar” (€2bn mortgage NPE securitization), “Cairo” (€7.5bn multi-asset securitization), the creation of a loan servicer, and a hive down. The bank will focus on core banking rather than functioning as a distressed real estate asset manager.

The outlook for the Greek economy has improved somewhat. The 2019 Budget is based on a primary surplus target of 3.5% of GDP. Exports and private consumption are drivers for solid growth of around 2%. The cash buffer of at least EUR26.5 bn is equivalent to 2 years of gross financing needs. Moody’s raised Greece’s issuer rating to B1 from B3 and its outlook to stable from positive (Feb19). The sovereign gained market access with recent 5year €2.5bn and 10year €2.5bn issues. A tailwind will be the resurgence of “animal spirits” under a New Democracy administration after elections later this year.

2. Krung Thai Bank: Not as Cheap as It Looks

Originally, Krung Thai Bank Pub (KTB TB) struck us as interesting. A solid PH Score™, reasonable franchise valuation and P/Book, and a low RSI.

However, further due-diligence shows a somewhat stagnant and eroding operation.

• Headline profitability improvement is unrelated to efficiency or to operational advances.
• Cost growth is fast outpacing a declining top-line.
• Interest income has actually fallen for each of the last 3 years.
• The bank is being squeezed on margin despite keeping interest expenses unchanged.
• Non-interest expenses soared by 26% YoY.
• The bottom line (and profitability) was flattered by varied low quality items as well as much lower loan loss provisions, but still remained well above comprehensive income.
• Asset Quality is also concerning (despite lower loan loss provisions) given the sharp rise in loss (especially) and substandard loans as well as the amount of Special Mention Loans on the Balance Sheet. This means provisioning of problem loans may not be sufficient.
• Liquidity: Deposits are also declining, pushing up the LDR.

3. Chiyoda: Minor Updates About the Major Capital Infusion, Cost Overruns and Upcoming Orders

The key point of interest for investors regarding Chiyoda Corp (6366 JP) continues to be details surrounding its upcoming capital raise. The company has, since early November when it incurred these losses, offered scant details regarding the structure of the capital raise, except to note that the components would include additional loans and equity from industrial partners and most likely, main shareholder Mitsubishi Corp (8058 JP).

We visited the company to gather as much information as possible on the potential structure of the capital increase and to update the order outlook and reasons for further cost overruns.

4. Geo Energy (GERL SP): Recovery in Coal Price from 4Q18 Bottom; Continue to Wait for M&A Action

Geo Energy Resources (GERL SP) reported weak 4Q18 results late last month. The reason for the 5M USD net loss in 4Q18 was mainly due to Chinese import restrictions for Indonesian coal in November and December last year. With the import quota removed as of January ICI4 coal prices have rebounded from +/-30 USD/ton late 2018 to 40 USD/ton this week. 

Geo remains in deep value territory (3x EV/EBITDA) as the company still has over 200M USD+ in cash it raised from a 300M USD bond placing almost 18 months ago. While the CEO announced plans to organize a HK dual listing in 1H19 this cannot materialize unless management can execute on a significant acquisition opportunity it has been considering for the last twelve months. With Indonesian elections coming up next month the hope is that clarity on this potential transaction can be sorted by late 1H19.

While Europe is obsessed with Climate Change doomsday scenarios being shouted around by school-skipping teenagers, the reality is that three out of four of the most populated countries in the world (China, India and Indonesia) will remain heavy users of coal for decades to come. With cleaner coal technology being the key differentiator how much pollution is emitted.

My Fair Value estimate (Base case) remains 0.35 SGD or 89% upside.  Please recall, Macquarie paid 0.29 SGD for a 5% stake in November 2018 and had warrants issued to it at 0.33 SGD.

In this briefing:

1. China Minsheng: Unless There Is Opposing Wind, a Kite Cannot Rise.
2. Taiwan Business Bank: Catching the Sun’s Rays
3. Indonesia Property-In Search of the End of the Rainbow- Part 7 – Kawasan Industri Jababeka (KIJA IJ)
4. Guangzhou Rural: All the Shakespearoes?
5. ICBC: Opportunity in Disguise

1. China Minsheng: Unless There Is Opposing Wind, a Kite Cannot Rise.

Profitability at China Minsheng Banking A (600016 CH) in 2018 slipped. Similar to other Chinese lenders, rising Loan Loss Provisions exerted a negative pull on the bottom-line, testament to gnawing Asset Quality issues. In addition, similar to some banks, the top-line came under pressure from the rising cost of source of funding. Also the bank was not alone in juicing up its bottom-line with hefty trading gains. Thus Earnings Quality could have been better.

Given the underlying squeeze on core Income, it was encouraging to see management at least restrain OPEX.

Regarding Asset quality, write-offs soared by 153% YoY while substandard and loss Loans jumped by 68% YoY and 14%, respectively, and Loan Loss Provisions rose by 35.6% YoY. It is perhaps a little surprising then that coverage ratios decreased given the trend in credit costs, NPL migration, and charge-offs.

LDR remains quite high though credit growth last year was not gung-ho and broadly in line with Deposit expansion. We do note though a ratcheting up of CRE lending which jumped from 8.8% of the total Loan book to 12.3%.

2. Taiwan Business Bank: Catching the Sun’s Rays

Taiwan Business Bank (2834 TT) ticks most of the boxes with a PH Score of 10. This is a top decile performance globally in terms of fundamental trends from our quantamental value-quality gauge.

We would caution that the asset quality is not as crystalline as the reduced NPL ratio indicates given that rising impaired loans represent 5x NPLs. We await greater granularity from further analysis of the NPL breakdown by category. Having said that, the impaired loan ratio is still pretty low and manageable at 1.48% while Provisioning -on an upward trend- should reflect increasing non-NPL but impaired assets.

Results were markedly impacted by a palpable reduction in Loan Loss Provisions which will be a response, we assume, to lower problem loans or NPLs as well as very strong recoveries (net negative charge-offs), rather than higher impaired Loans.

In addition, the trend in Efficiency may not be as good as it appears to be given that OPEX expansion outpaced “Underlying Income” expansion. The latter was impacted by a sharp increase in Interest Expenses from Deposits especially, as well as a tepid Fee Income performance. While Interest Income from non-credit assets rose robustly, the core Interest Income on Loans firmed by 11.4% YoY, for a YoY gain of NT2.3bn, despite a modest decrease in the Loan portfolio in such a low margin environment. Interestingly, Loan recoveries also saw a NT2.3bn gain.

Valuation is quite appealing given the tailwinds of a high PH Score. FV, P/Book, and Earnings Yield stand at 6%, 0.9x, and 10%, respectively.

3. Indonesia Property-In Search of the End of the Rainbow- Part 7 – Kawasan Industri Jababeka (KIJA IJ)

In this series under Smartkarma Originals, CrossASEAN insight providers AngusMackintosh and Jessica Irene seek to determine whether or not we are close to the end of the rainbow and to a period of outperformance for the property sector. Our end conclusions will be based on a series of company visits to the major listed property companies in Indonesia, conversations with local banks, property agents, and other relevant channel checks. 

In the seventh company in ongoing Smartkarma Originals series on the property space in Indonesia, we now look at Indonesia’s oldest Industrial Estate developer and operator Kawasan Industri Jababeka (KIJA IJ). The company’s largest and the original estate is in Cikarang to the East of Jakarta and comprises 1,239 hectares of industrial land bank and a masterplan of 5,600 ha. 

It has a blue chip customer base both local and foreign at Cikarang including Unilever Indonesia (UNVR IJ), Samsung Electronics (005930 KS), as well as a number of Japanese automakers and their related suppliers.

The company has also expanded its presence to Kendal, close to Semarang in Central Java, where it has a joint venture with Singapore listed company Sembcorp Industries (SCI SP). This estate covers a total area of 2,700 ha to be developed in three phases over a period of 25 years and is focused on manufacturing in industries.

The company also has successfully installed a 140 MW gas-fired power station at its Cikarang, providing a recurrent stream utility-type earnings, which cushion against the volatility in its industrial estate and property earnings. After some issues with one of its boilers (non-recurrent) and issues early last year with PLN, this asset now looks set to provide a stable earnings stream for the company.

KIJA has also built a dry-port at Cikarang estate which has been increasing throughput by around +25% every year, providing its customers with the facility for customs clearance at a faster pace of that at the Tanjong Priok port, as well as logistics support. 

After two difficult years where the company has been hit by a combination of problems at its power plant, foreign exchange write-downs, and slower demand for industrial plots, the company now looks set to see a strong recovery in earnings in 2019 and beyond.

The company has seen coverage from equity analysts dwindle, which means there are no consensus estimates but it looks attractive from both a PBV and an NAV basis trading on 0.85x FY19E PBV and at a 73% discount to NAV. If the company were to trade back to its historical mean from a PBV and PER point of view, this would imply an upside of 33% to IDR325, using a blend of the two measures. An absence of one-off charges in 2019 and a pick up in industrial sales should mean a significant recovery in earnings, putting the company on an FY19E PER multiple of 9.7x, which is by no means expensive given its strategic positioning and given that this is a recovery story. 

4. Guangzhou Rural: All the Shakespearoes?

I am partial to a bit of Confucius. Or to such thinking. Now and again. The chairman of Guangzhou Rural Commercial Bank (1551 HK) has a Confucian message (scholars will no doubt berate me) at the beginning of the report and accounts: “A single spark can start a prairie fire while a crack can lead to ice breaking”. From what I can glean, the chairman is alluding to the forty year process of China’s emergence. No satanic conflagration intended or any portends of global warming. For some reason, a tune by the 1970s new-wave group, The Stranglers, passed through my mind: “He got an ice pick that made his ears burn” and “They watched their Rome burn”. Cultural differences perhaps.

Guangzhou Rural Commercial Bank (1551 HK) shares many of the issues that affect Chinese lenders today.  (The “Big four” are much less susceptible to deep stresses in this environment). Unsurprisingly, Asset Quality issues weigh on these results and earnings quality is subpar with trading gains and other assorted non-operating or “other items” playing a big part in the composition of Pre-Tax Profit. The latter flatters the “improving” headline Cost-Income ratio which is not really an indicator of greater efficiency here. In fact underlying “jaws” are highly negative. It is thus surprising that the wage bill should shoot up 30% YoY in such austere times. Given the aforementioned Asset Quality issues, such as booming substandard loans, ballooning credit costs, and high charge-offs, the “improving” NPL ratio is flattered by an exuberant denominator. Asset Quality does look volatile. The Liquidity Coverage Ratio and LDR duly eroded.

Where the bank does better, in contrast to many other Chinese lenders, is on Net Interest Income.  Guangzhou seems to have reduced its funding costs markedly. The bank managed to lower its corporate time deposit rates especially. The result is that Interest Expenses on Deposits rose by just 6.4% YoY. Liability management seems to be behind a reduction in Debt/Equity from 2.79x to 1.62x, thus decreasing Debt funding costs by 24% YoY. Spurred by corporate credit growth of 38% YoY, Interest Income on Loans climbed by 31% YoY. However, the bank does share an issue with some other lenders – a collapse in Interest Income on non-credit earning assets. This is, in part, due to a shrinkage of its FI holdings by some CN89.5bn. This means that despite the credit spurt, Interest Income in its totality edged up by barely 1% YoY. A disappointing performance on fee income (custody, wealth management, advisory) reduced Total underlying Income growth to 6% YoY. That 6% is all about rampant corporate credit supply and lower corporate deposit and debt interest costs.

Trends are thus decidedly mixed given the underlying picture behind the positive headline fundamental change in Efficiency, Asset Quality and ROAA. Liquidity deteriorated. It must be said that Provisioning was enhanced, Capitalisation moved in the right direction, while NIM and Interest Spread both improved.

5. ICBC: Opportunity in Disguise

ICBC (H) (1398 HK) delivered a robust PH Score of 8.5 – our quantamental value-quality gauge.

A highlight was the trend in cost-control. The bank delivered underlying “jaws” of 420bps. Besides OPEX restraint, including payroll, Efficiency gains were supported by robust underlying top-line expansion as  growth in interest income on earning assets, underpinned by moderate credit growth, broadly matched expansion of interest expenses on interest-bearing Liabilities. This combination is not so prevalent in China these days, especially in smaller or medium-sized lenders.

It is well-flagged that the system is grappling with Asset Quality issues and there is a debate about the interrelated property market. ICBC is not immune, similar to other SOEs, from migration of souring loans. However, by China standards, rising asset writedowns which exerted a negative pull on Pre-Tax Profit as a % of pre-impairment Operating Profit, high charge-offs, and swelling (though not exploding) substandard and loss loans look arguably manageable given ICBC‘s sheer scale. The Asset Quality issue here is also not as bad as it was in bygone years (2004 springs to mind) when capital injections, asset transfers, and government-subsidised bad loan disposals were the order of the day. This is a “Big Four” player.

Shares are not expensive. ICBC trades at a P/Book of 0.8x, a Franchise Valuation of 10%, an Earnings Yield of 16.7%, a Dividend Yield of 4.9%, and a Total Return Ratio of 1.6x.

In this briefing:

1. Bank Alfalah: Metrics Point to Falāh

1. Bank Alfalah: Metrics Point to Falāh

Bank Alfalah (BAFL PA) is heading in the right direction as testified by its metric progression, embodied in its quintile 1 PH Score™.

Valuations are not stretched – especially the Total return Ratio of 1.8x and an Earnings Yield of 14.5%.

Combining the fundamental momentum signals (PH Score™) with franchise valuation, and a low RSI, places BAFL PA in the top decile of bank opportunities globally.

In this briefing:

1. Taiwan Business Bank: Catching the Sun’s Rays
2. Indonesia Property-In Search of the End of the Rainbow- Part 7 – Kawasan Industri Jababeka (KIJA IJ)
3. Guangzhou Rural: All the Shakespearoes?
4. ICBC: Opportunity in Disguise
5. Newmark Group Inc (NMRK US): Valuation/Fundamentals Mismatch, Stock Trades At Bargain Levels

1. Taiwan Business Bank: Catching the Sun’s Rays

Taiwan Business Bank (2834 TT) ticks most of the boxes with a PH Score of 10. This is a top decile performance globally in terms of fundamental trends from our quantamental value-quality gauge.

We would caution that the asset quality is not as crystalline as the reduced NPL ratio indicates given that rising impaired loans represent 5x NPLs. We await greater granularity from further analysis of the NPL breakdown by category. Having said that, the impaired loan ratio is still pretty low and manageable at 1.48% while Provisioning -on an upward trend- should reflect increasing non-NPL but impaired assets.

Results were markedly impacted by a palpable reduction in Loan Loss Provisions which will be a response, we assume, to lower problem loans or NPLs as well as very strong recoveries (net negative charge-offs), rather than higher impaired Loans.

In addition, the trend in Efficiency may not be as good as it appears to be given that OPEX expansion outpaced “Underlying Income” expansion. The latter was impacted by a sharp increase in Interest Expenses from Deposits especially, as well as a tepid Fee Income performance. While Interest Income from non-credit assets rose robustly, the core Interest Income on Loans firmed by 11.4% YoY, for a YoY gain of NT2.3bn, despite a modest decrease in the Loan portfolio in such a low margin environment. Interestingly, Loan recoveries also saw a NT2.3bn gain.

Valuation is quite appealing given the tailwinds of a high PH Score. FV, P/Book, and Earnings Yield stand at 6%, 0.9x, and 10%, respectively.

2. Indonesia Property-In Search of the End of the Rainbow- Part 7 – Kawasan Industri Jababeka (KIJA IJ)

In this series under Smartkarma Originals, CrossASEAN insight providers AngusMackintosh and Jessica Irene seek to determine whether or not we are close to the end of the rainbow and to a period of outperformance for the property sector. Our end conclusions will be based on a series of company visits to the major listed property companies in Indonesia, conversations with local banks, property agents, and other relevant channel checks. 

In the seventh company in ongoing Smartkarma Originals series on the property space in Indonesia, we now look at Indonesia’s oldest Industrial Estate developer and operator Kawasan Industri Jababeka (KIJA IJ). The company’s largest and the original estate is in Cikarang to the East of Jakarta and comprises 1,239 hectares of industrial land bank and a masterplan of 5,600 ha. 

It has a blue chip customer base both local and foreign at Cikarang including Unilever Indonesia (UNVR IJ), Samsung Electronics (005930 KS), as well as a number of Japanese automakers and their related suppliers.

The company has also expanded its presence to Kendal, close to Semarang in Central Java, where it has a joint venture with Singapore listed company Sembcorp Industries (SCI SP). This estate covers a total area of 2,700 ha to be developed in three phases over a period of 25 years and is focused on manufacturing in industries.

The company also has successfully installed a 140 MW gas-fired power station at its Cikarang, providing a recurrent stream utility-type earnings, which cushion against the volatility in its industrial estate and property earnings. After some issues with one of its boilers (non-recurrent) and issues early last year with PLN, this asset now looks set to provide a stable earnings stream for the company.

KIJA has also built a dry-port at Cikarang estate which has been increasing throughput by around +25% every year, providing its customers with the facility for customs clearance at a faster pace of that at the Tanjong Priok port, as well as logistics support. 

After two difficult years where the company has been hit by a combination of problems at its power plant, foreign exchange write-downs, and slower demand for industrial plots, the company now looks set to see a strong recovery in earnings in 2019 and beyond.

The company has seen coverage from equity analysts dwindle, which means there are no consensus estimates but it looks attractive from both a PBV and an NAV basis trading on 0.85x FY19E PBV and at a 73% discount to NAV. If the company were to trade back to its historical mean from a PBV and PER point of view, this would imply an upside of 33% to IDR325, using a blend of the two measures. An absence of one-off charges in 2019 and a pick up in industrial sales should mean a significant recovery in earnings, putting the company on an FY19E PER multiple of 9.7x, which is by no means expensive given its strategic positioning and given that this is a recovery story. 

3. Guangzhou Rural: All the Shakespearoes?

I am partial to a bit of Confucius. Or to such thinking. Now and again. The chairman of Guangzhou Rural Commercial Bank (1551 HK) has a Confucian message (scholars will no doubt berate me) at the beginning of the report and accounts: “A single spark can start a prairie fire while a crack can lead to ice breaking”. From what I can glean, the chairman is alluding to the forty year process of China’s emergence. No satanic conflagration intended or any portends of global warming. For some reason, a tune by the 1970s new-wave group, The Stranglers, passed through my mind: “He got an ice pick that made his ears burn” and “They watched their Rome burn”. Cultural differences perhaps.

Guangzhou Rural Commercial Bank (1551 HK) shares many of the issues that affect Chinese lenders today.  (The “Big four” are much less susceptible to deep stresses in this environment). Unsurprisingly, Asset Quality issues weigh on these results and earnings quality is subpar with trading gains and other assorted non-operating or “other items” playing a big part in the composition of Pre-Tax Profit. The latter flatters the “improving” headline Cost-Income ratio which is not really an indicator of greater efficiency here. In fact underlying “jaws” are highly negative. It is thus surprising that the wage bill should shoot up 30% YoY in such austere times. Given the aforementioned Asset Quality issues, such as booming substandard loans, ballooning credit costs, and high charge-offs, the “improving” NPL ratio is flattered by an exuberant denominator. Asset Quality does look volatile. The Liquidity Coverage Ratio and LDR duly eroded.

Where the bank does better, in contrast to many other Chinese lenders, is on Net Interest Income.  Guangzhou seems to have reduced its funding costs markedly. The bank managed to lower its corporate time deposit rates especially. The result is that Interest Expenses on Deposits rose by just 6.4% YoY. Liability management seems to be behind a reduction in Debt/Equity from 2.79x to 1.62x, thus decreasing Debt funding costs by 24% YoY. Spurred by corporate credit growth of 38% YoY, Interest Income on Loans climbed by 31% YoY. However, the bank does share an issue with some other lenders – a collapse in Interest Income on non-credit earning assets. This is, in part, due to a shrinkage of its FI holdings by some CN89.5bn. This means that despite the credit spurt, Interest Income in its totality edged up by barely 1% YoY. A disappointing performance on fee income (custody, wealth management, advisory) reduced Total underlying Income growth to 6% YoY. That 6% is all about rampant corporate credit supply and lower corporate deposit and debt interest costs.

Trends are thus decidedly mixed given the underlying picture behind the positive headline fundamental change in Efficiency, Asset Quality and ROAA. Liquidity deteriorated. It must be said that Provisioning was enhanced, Capitalisation moved in the right direction, while NIM and Interest Spread both improved.

4. ICBC: Opportunity in Disguise

ICBC (H) (1398 HK) delivered a robust PH Score of 8.5 – our quantamental value-quality gauge.

A highlight was the trend in cost-control. The bank delivered underlying “jaws” of 420bps. Besides OPEX restraint, including payroll, Efficiency gains were supported by robust underlying top-line expansion as  growth in interest income on earning assets, underpinned by moderate credit growth, broadly matched expansion of interest expenses on interest-bearing Liabilities. This combination is not so prevalent in China these days, especially in smaller or medium-sized lenders.

It is well-flagged that the system is grappling with Asset Quality issues and there is a debate about the interrelated property market. ICBC is not immune, similar to other SOEs, from migration of souring loans. However, by China standards, rising asset writedowns which exerted a negative pull on Pre-Tax Profit as a % of pre-impairment Operating Profit, high charge-offs, and swelling (though not exploding) substandard and loss loans look arguably manageable given ICBC‘s sheer scale. The Asset Quality issue here is also not as bad as it was in bygone years (2004 springs to mind) when capital injections, asset transfers, and government-subsidised bad loan disposals were the order of the day. This is a “Big Four” player.

Shares are not expensive. ICBC trades at a P/Book of 0.8x, a Franchise Valuation of 10%, an Earnings Yield of 16.7%, a Dividend Yield of 4.9%, and a Total Return Ratio of 1.6x.

5. Newmark Group Inc (NMRK US): Valuation/Fundamentals Mismatch, Stock Trades At Bargain Levels

Having gained ~30% in a little more than two months following its full separation from BGC Partners (BGCP US) at the end of November 2018 after a dismal share price performance since coming to the market in a partial IPO at the end of December 2017,  the shares of commercial real estate services company, Newmark Group (NMRK US)  have experienced another slide over the past several weeks despite its cheap valuation which belies its positive fundanmental drivers and peer group comparisons.

Notwithstanding its robust fundamentals, notice of alterations it plans to make to its Non-GAAP earnings presentations to bring them more into line with many other US-listed companies, has brought the company into the headlights of the ongoing controversy caused by this topic,  and in particular with respect to the treatement of stock-based compensation in Non-GAAP earnings. While Newmark follows many other companies by excluding it from Adjusted Earnings, its heavy use of stock-based compensation, which it intends to lessen going forward, makes it an easy target for critique of its earnings presentations. Nevertheless, we assess that Newmark is at least 35%  undervalued relative to its peers after incorparting stock compensation expenses in its earnings-based valuation metrics. It is also noteworthy that Newmark is currently paying shareholders a yield of ~4% against barely any dividend being paid out by peers

In this briefing:

1. Indonesia Property-In Search of the End of the Rainbow- Part 7 – Kawasan Industri Jababeka (KIJA IJ)
2. Guangzhou Rural: All the Shakespearoes?
3. ICBC: Opportunity in Disguise
4. Newmark Group Inc (NMRK US): Valuation/Fundamentals Mismatch, Stock Trades At Bargain Levels
5. Bank of Zhengzhou: “Bend One Cubit, Make Eight Cubits Straight”

1. Indonesia Property-In Search of the End of the Rainbow- Part 7 – Kawasan Industri Jababeka (KIJA IJ)

In this series under Smartkarma Originals, CrossASEAN insight providers AngusMackintosh and Jessica Irene seek to determine whether or not we are close to the end of the rainbow and to a period of outperformance for the property sector. Our end conclusions will be based on a series of company visits to the major listed property companies in Indonesia, conversations with local banks, property agents, and other relevant channel checks. 

In the seventh company in ongoing Smartkarma Originals series on the property space in Indonesia, we now look at Indonesia’s oldest Industrial Estate developer and operator Kawasan Industri Jababeka (KIJA IJ). The company’s largest and the original estate is in Cikarang to the East of Jakarta and comprises 1,239 hectares of industrial land bank and a masterplan of 5,600 ha. 

It has a blue chip customer base both local and foreign at Cikarang including Unilever Indonesia (UNVR IJ), Samsung Electronics (005930 KS), as well as a number of Japanese automakers and their related suppliers.

The company has also expanded its presence to Kendal, close to Semarang in Central Java, where it has a joint venture with Singapore listed company Sembcorp Industries (SCI SP). This estate covers a total area of 2,700 ha to be developed in three phases over a period of 25 years and is focused on manufacturing in industries.

The company also has successfully installed a 140 MW gas-fired power station at its Cikarang, providing a recurrent stream utility-type earnings, which cushion against the volatility in its industrial estate and property earnings. After some issues with one of its boilers (non-recurrent) and issues early last year with PLN, this asset now looks set to provide a stable earnings stream for the company.

KIJA has also built a dry-port at Cikarang estate which has been increasing throughput by around +25% every year, providing its customers with the facility for customs clearance at a faster pace of that at the Tanjong Priok port, as well as logistics support. 

After two difficult years where the company has been hit by a combination of problems at its power plant, foreign exchange write-downs, and slower demand for industrial plots, the company now looks set to see a strong recovery in earnings in 2019 and beyond.

The company has seen coverage from equity analysts dwindle, which means there are no consensus estimates but it looks attractive from both a PBV and an NAV basis trading on 0.85x FY19E PBV and at a 73% discount to NAV. If the company were to trade back to its historical mean from a PBV and PER point of view, this would imply an upside of 33% to IDR325, using a blend of the two measures. An absence of one-off charges in 2019 and a pick up in industrial sales should mean a significant recovery in earnings, putting the company on an FY19E PER multiple of 9.7x, which is by no means expensive given its strategic positioning and given that this is a recovery story. 

2. Guangzhou Rural: All the Shakespearoes?

I am partial to a bit of Confucius. Or to such thinking. Now and again. The chairman of Guangzhou Rural Commercial Bank (1551 HK) has a Confucian message (scholars will no doubt berate me) at the beginning of the report and accounts: “A single spark can start a prairie fire while a crack can lead to ice breaking”. From what I can glean, the chairman is alluding to the forty year process of China’s emergence. No satanic conflagration intended or any portends of global warming. For some reason, a tune by the 1970s new-wave group, The Stranglers, passed through my mind: “He got an ice pick that made his ears burn” and “They watched their Rome burn”. Cultural differences perhaps.

Guangzhou Rural Commercial Bank (1551 HK) shares many of the issues that affect Chinese lenders today.  (The “Big four” are much less susceptible to deep stresses in this environment). Unsurprisingly, Asset Quality issues weigh on these results and earnings quality is subpar with trading gains and other assorted non-operating or “other items” playing a big part in the composition of Pre-Tax Profit. The latter flatters the “improving” headline Cost-Income ratio which is not really an indicator of greater efficiency here. In fact underlying “jaws” are highly negative. It is thus surprising that the wage bill should shoot up 30% YoY in such austere times. Given the aforementioned Asset Quality issues, such as booming substandard loans, ballooning credit costs, and high charge-offs, the “improving” NPL ratio is flattered by an exuberant denominator. Asset Quality does look volatile. The Liquidity Coverage Ratio and LDR duly eroded.

Where the bank does better, in contrast to many other Chinese lenders, is on Net Interest Income.  Guangzhou seems to have reduced its funding costs markedly. The bank managed to lower its corporate time deposit rates especially. The result is that Interest Expenses on Deposits rose by just 6.4% YoY. Liability management seems to be behind a reduction in Debt/Equity from 2.79x to 1.62x, thus decreasing Debt funding costs by 24% YoY. Spurred by corporate credit growth of 38% YoY, Interest Income on Loans climbed by 31% YoY. However, the bank does share an issue with some other lenders – a collapse in Interest Income on non-credit earning assets. This is, in part, due to a shrinkage of its FI holdings by some CN89.5bn. This means that despite the credit spurt, Interest Income in its totality edged up by barely 1% YoY. A disappointing performance on fee income (custody, wealth management, advisory) reduced Total underlying Income growth to 6% YoY. That 6% is all about rampant corporate credit supply and lower corporate deposit and debt interest costs.

Trends are thus decidedly mixed given the underlying picture behind the positive headline fundamental change in Efficiency, Asset Quality and ROAA. Liquidity deteriorated. It must be said that Provisioning was enhanced, Capitalisation moved in the right direction, while NIM and Interest Spread both improved.

3. ICBC: Opportunity in Disguise

ICBC (H) (1398 HK) delivered a robust PH Score of 8.5 – our quantamental value-quality gauge.

A highlight was the trend in cost-control. The bank delivered underlying “jaws” of 420bps. Besides OPEX restraint, including payroll, Efficiency gains were supported by robust underlying top-line expansion as  growth in interest income on earning assets, underpinned by moderate credit growth, broadly matched expansion of interest expenses on interest-bearing Liabilities. This combination is not so prevalent in China these days, especially in smaller or medium-sized lenders.

It is well-flagged that the system is grappling with Asset Quality issues and there is a debate about the interrelated property market. ICBC is not immune, similar to other SOEs, from migration of souring loans. However, by China standards, rising asset writedowns which exerted a negative pull on Pre-Tax Profit as a % of pre-impairment Operating Profit, high charge-offs, and swelling (though not exploding) substandard and loss loans look arguably manageable given ICBC‘s sheer scale. The Asset Quality issue here is also not as bad as it was in bygone years (2004 springs to mind) when capital injections, asset transfers, and government-subsidised bad loan disposals were the order of the day. This is a “Big Four” player.

Shares are not expensive. ICBC trades at a P/Book of 0.8x, a Franchise Valuation of 10%, an Earnings Yield of 16.7%, a Dividend Yield of 4.9%, and a Total Return Ratio of 1.6x.

4. Newmark Group Inc (NMRK US): Valuation/Fundamentals Mismatch, Stock Trades At Bargain Levels

Having gained ~30% in a little more than two months following its full separation from BGC Partners (BGCP US) at the end of November 2018 after a dismal share price performance since coming to the market in a partial IPO at the end of December 2017,  the shares of commercial real estate services company, Newmark Group (NMRK US)  have experienced another slide over the past several weeks despite its cheap valuation which belies its positive fundanmental drivers and peer group comparisons.

Notwithstanding its robust fundamentals, notice of alterations it plans to make to its Non-GAAP earnings presentations to bring them more into line with many other US-listed companies, has brought the company into the headlights of the ongoing controversy caused by this topic,  and in particular with respect to the treatement of stock-based compensation in Non-GAAP earnings. While Newmark follows many other companies by excluding it from Adjusted Earnings, its heavy use of stock-based compensation, which it intends to lessen going forward, makes it an easy target for critique of its earnings presentations. Nevertheless, we assess that Newmark is at least 35%  undervalued relative to its peers after incorparting stock compensation expenses in its earnings-based valuation metrics. It is also noteworthy that Newmark is currently paying shareholders a yield of ~4% against barely any dividend being paid out by peers

5. Bank of Zhengzhou: “Bend One Cubit, Make Eight Cubits Straight”

Bank Of Zhengzhou (6196 HK) reveals a picture of cascading asset toxicity and subpar earnings quality. As elsewhere in China, it is difficult to decipher whether better NPL recognition is behind this profound asset quality deterioration or poor underwriting practice and discipline combined with troubled debtors: the answer may lie somewhere in between.

While the low PH Score (a value-quality gauge) of 4.7 is supported by a lowly valuation metric (earnings quality is not reassuring), it is more a testament to -and reflection of- core eroding fundamental trends across the board. Regarding trends, Capital Adequacy and Provisioning were the variables to post a positive change. But even then, not all Capitalisation and Provisioning metrics moved in the right direction.

Franchise Valuation at 12% does not indicate that the bank is especially cheap though P/Book of 0.64x is below the regional median of 0.78x.

In this briefing:

1. Chiyoda: Minor Updates About the Major Capital Infusion, Cost Overruns and Upcoming Orders
2. Geo Energy (GERL SP): Recovery in Coal Price from 4Q18 Bottom; Continue to Wait for M&A Action
3. Hitachi High Tech’s Ace in the Hole
4. Bank Alfalah: Metrics Point to Falāh

1. Chiyoda: Minor Updates About the Major Capital Infusion, Cost Overruns and Upcoming Orders

The key point of interest for investors regarding Chiyoda Corp (6366 JP) continues to be details surrounding its upcoming capital raise. The company has, since early November when it incurred these losses, offered scant details regarding the structure of the capital raise, except to note that the components would include additional loans and equity from industrial partners and most likely, main shareholder Mitsubishi Corp (8058 JP).

We visited the company to gather as much information as possible on the potential structure of the capital increase and to update the order outlook and reasons for further cost overruns.

2. Geo Energy (GERL SP): Recovery in Coal Price from 4Q18 Bottom; Continue to Wait for M&A Action

Geo Energy Resources (GERL SP) reported weak 4Q18 results late last month. The reason for the 5M USD net loss in 4Q18 was mainly due to Chinese import restrictions for Indonesian coal in November and December last year. With the import quota removed as of January ICI4 coal prices have rebounded from +/-30 USD/ton late 2018 to 40 USD/ton this week. 

Geo remains in deep value territory (3x EV/EBITDA) as the company still has over 200M USD+ in cash it raised from a 300M USD bond placing almost 18 months ago. While the CEO announced plans to organize a HK dual listing in 1H19 this cannot materialize unless management can execute on a significant acquisition opportunity it has been considering for the last twelve months. With Indonesian elections coming up next month the hope is that clarity on this potential transaction can be sorted by late 1H19.

While Europe is obsessed with Climate Change doomsday scenarios being shouted around by school-skipping teenagers, the reality is that three out of four of the most populated countries in the world (China, India and Indonesia) will remain heavy users of coal for decades to come. With cleaner coal technology being the key differentiator how much pollution is emitted.

My Fair Value estimate (Base case) remains 0.35 SGD or 89% upside.  Please recall, Macquarie paid 0.29 SGD for a 5% stake in November 2018 and had warrants issued to it at 0.33 SGD.

3. Hitachi High Tech’s Ace in the Hole

Last Friday, Hitachi (6501) was reported to be considering selling Hitachi Chemical (4217), according to media sources over the weekend. This has sent Hitachi Chemical and its parent into a frenzy with Hitachi Chemical ADR up 13% last Friday. We believe this news is relevant for Hitachi High Tech because both subsidiaries are 51-52% consolidated by the parent Hitachi, and both have arguably businesses with little synergy with the parent. We believe that Hitachi High Tech is also rumored to be on the block for sale or spin-off.  Media sources say that Hitachi is considering a sale of Hitachi Chemical and would reap Y300bn.  The current value of their 51% ownership in Hitachi Chemical is Y211bn, and thus there is 42% implied upside if the Y300bn figure is achieved.

To recap Q3 results for Hitachi High Tech from January 31, 2019, the numbers were decent with earnings above consensus forecasts by 33% for Q3 (Y15.8bn OP versus Y13.8bn forecast). The profit rise was due to improved margins in medical and continued strength in process semiconductor equipment. The shares are up 20% year-to-date, outperforming the Nikkei by 15%. Some of the fears of a sharp slowdown in semiconductor have been nullified by the continued strength in logic chip investments as well as the improved profitability in medical clinical analyzers. Medical profits soared 46% YoY in Q3 to Y7.6bn on a 13% YoY increase in revenues. OP margin improved from 12.3% to 15.8% YoY.

4. Bank Alfalah: Metrics Point to Falāh

Bank Alfalah (BAFL PA) is heading in the right direction as testified by its metric progression, embodied in its quintile 1 PH Score™.

Valuations are not stretched – especially the Total return Ratio of 1.8x and an Earnings Yield of 14.5%.

Combining the fundamental momentum signals (PH Score™) with franchise valuation, and a low RSI, places BAFL PA in the top decile of bank opportunities globally.