TMT/Internet

In this briefing:

1. SoftBank Corp (9434 JP) & Arteria Networks (4423 JP): A Tale of Two IPOs
2. MYOB Caves And Agrees To KKR’s Reduced Offer
3. COM7 (COM7 TB): Acquisition to Support Aggressive Expansion
4. TRACKING TRAFFIC/Chinese Express & Logistics: Parcel Pricing Weak, Again
5. Elastic: Why Is It Outperforming In Recent Tech Carnage?

1. SoftBank Corp (9434 JP) & Arteria Networks (4423 JP): A Tale of Two IPOs

During the second half of December 2018, Japan saw two telecom companies list on the Tokyo Stock Exchange: Softbank Corp (9434 JP) and ARTERIA Networks (4423 JP). After years of industry consolidation, which saw several stocks delist, this felt like a Christmas miracle (at least for those watching the sector’s stocks).

It would be hard to find two companies in the same industry that are so different – both in their business models as well as in how their IPOs were positioned to investors. One stock is 100 times larger than the other, but this is not a story of David and Goliath. It is two unique stories in parallel. 

While each company took a very different approach to selling its stock, both have suffered from the subsequent broader market weakness, irrespective of company specifics. We can’t say it has been the worst of times, but it certainly has been a tough time with SoftBank Corp down 13% and Arteria down 20% from their IPO prices.

In this Insight we explore how each company approached its IPO and how each has fared since. 

2. MYOB Caves And Agrees To KKR’s Reduced Offer

It could have gone either way.

After securing a 19.9% stake from Bain in early October and initially pitching A$3.70/share, in a textbook bear hug, KKR (marginally) bumped its indicative offer to A$3.77/share to a get a look under the hood, then following seven weeks of due diligence, backtracked with a lower price of A$3.40/share, citing adverse market conditions.

MYOB Board’s response last week to the reduced offer was to inform KKR that it is not in a position to recommend the revised proposal, however, “it remains in discussions with KKR regarding its proposal”, leaving the door open for ongoing negotiations. KKR for its part, said there were no landmines following the DD process. The price action last Friday suggested the outcome was a coin toss.

Today, KKR and MYOB entered into Scheme Implementation Agreement (SIA) at $3.40/share, valuing MYOB, on a market cap basis, at A$2bn. MYOB’s board unanimously recommends shareholders to vote in favour of the Offer, in the absence of a superior proposal and subject to an independent expert concluding the Offer is in the best interest of shareholders. The Offer price assumes no full-year dividend is paid.

The agreement provides a “go shop” provision until the 22 February 2019 – when MYOB is expected to release its FY18 results – to solicit competing proposals.

The Offer appears reasonable when compared to peers and with regards to the 14% decline in the ASX technology index; but conversely, could be construed as being opportunistic.

A Scheme Booklet is expected to be dispatched mid-March with an estimated implementation date of 3 May. Currently trading at a 3.8%/11% gross/annualised spread. 1 January makes a new year and there will be investors who would want to take an agreed deal at 11%.

3. COM7 (COM7 TB): Acquisition to Support Aggressive Expansion

• Improving asset turnover, good risk adjusted price momentum, and relatively strong analyst recommendations relative to its sector
• Larger distribution channel through acquisition of DNA Retail Link to add 95 more stores to current 518 stores
• New mobile product launches in 4Q18 and COM7’s focus on high margin products, such as Android smartphones, should support high earnings growth which was up 56% YoY in 3Q18
• Attractive at a 19CE* PEG of 0.9 versus ASEAN sector at a PEG of 2.7
• Risks: Lower-than-expected demand for new IT products, slower-than-expected store expansions

* Consensus Estimates

4. TRACKING TRAFFIC/Chinese Express & Logistics: Parcel Pricing Weak, Again

Tracking Traffic/Chinese Express & Logistics is the hub for our research on China’s express parcels and logistics sectors. Tracking Traffic/Chinese Express & Logistics features analysis of monthly Chinese express and logistics data, notes from our conversations with industry players, and links to company and thematic notes. 

This month’s issue covers the following topics:

5. Elastic: Why Is It Outperforming In Recent Tech Carnage?

• Elastic NV (ESTC US) has been one of the best tech IPOs globally in 2018. Its current price is $62.53, up 74% from its IPO price of $36. Elastic’s share price has been holding up very nicely since its IPO on October 5th, 2018. Meanwhile, from October 5th to December 21st 2018, many tech stocks have experienced brutal declines. Elastic’s ability to outperform the top US tech stocks in a very difficult environment for the stock market sets the stage for a continued out-performance once the stock market starts to stabilize. 
• Since the IPO, the company reported better than expected second quarter results (quarter ending October 31, 2018) on December 4th. The company’s adjusted net loss in FY2Q19 was $0.38 per share, beating analysts’ consensus estimate by 9 cents. It generated revenue of $63.6 million, up 72% YoY. Calculated billings were also strong at $88.5 million, up 73% YoY. 
• The company’s guidance for FY3Q19 (quarter ending January 31, 2019) is to generate revenue in the range of $64 million to $66 million, representing a 56% YoY growth rate at the midpoint of the guidance. It expects to generate operating margin of negative 28% to negative 30% in FY3Q19. 
• A combination of major investors shifting their assets away from FAANG and semiconductor stocks has resulted in some improved performance of many software related stocks in recent months relative to other major tech stocks. In general, these stocks face less negative impact from a prolonged trade war between China and the US. Plus, they are not as exposed to the higher cycle volatility as the semiconductor related stocks. In many respects, Elastic shares many business similarities with these software driven companies, and thus has been more immune from the decline in the stock prices since early October. We remain positive on Elastic NV (ESTC US).

In this briefing:

1. Hyosung Holdings: 10%p Drop in Discount to NAV Should Be Reverted Soon
2. Recruit Holdings Down 30% From October; Still Not Cheap
3. Uber IPO: Its Sprawling Empire And Battle Lines (Part 3)
4. Okinawa Cellular (9436 JP): Warm Tropical Breezes with KDDI
5. GMO Internet (9447 JP) – Grossly or Modestly Overrated?

1. Hyosung Holdings: 10%p Drop in Discount to NAV Should Be Reverted Soon

• Hyosung Corporation (004800 KS) had fallen 16% just in two days. Holdco is now at a 50% discount to NAV. This is a 10%p drop from 10 days ago (Dec 19). Holdco price must have been overly corrected. The ongoing police investigation on Cho Hyun-joon’s alleged crime won’t lead to a delisting. 10%p drop in discount to NAV must be a price divergence, not a sensible price correction.
• Trade volume remained steady. Local hedge funds led the selling on Dec 27. Even they changed their position the following day. No short selling spike has been seen either. Hyosung is one of the highest yielding div holdco stocks. Hyosung Capital liquidation and Anyang Plant revaluation would be another short-term plus.
• I’d exploit this price divergence. It would soon revert to the Dec 19 discount level. It should at least stay at the peer average.

2. Recruit Holdings Down 30% From October; Still Not Cheap

The share price of Recruit Holdings (6098 JP) has fallen by around 30% over the past three months from an all-time high of JPY3,826 (on 1^st October 2018) to JPY2,705 on 24^th December 2018. Prior to this, Recruit’s share price saw a strong upward rally during May-September following the company’s announcement that it would acquire Glassdoor Inc. (the company which operates the employment information website glassdoor.com).

We expect Recruit’s consolidated revenue to grow 7.7% and 6.5% YoY in FY03/19E and FY03/20E respectively, driven by the acquisition of Glassdoor and steady growth in Japanese staffing operations, partially offset by a likely slowdown in global labour market activity. We also expect Recruit’s consolidated EBITDA margin to improve by around 50bps due to higher margin from Glassdoor.

Despite the recent dip in share price and steady topline and bottom line growth over the forecast period, at a FY2 EV/EBITDA multiple of 14.0x, Recruit doesn’t look particularly attractive to us. Recruit’s internet advertising business and employment business peers, Yahoo Japan (4689 JP) and Persol Holdings (2181 JP) are trading at FY2 EV/EBITDAs of 7.7x and 9.6x respectively.

3. Uber IPO: Its Sprawling Empire And Battle Lines (Part 3)

Although Uber aims to be an Amazon for transport, we will focus on the ride-hailing market in part 3 of this series. Here, we try to answer the following questions:

1. What are the indicative ride-hailing market shares of Uber vs Lyft in North America?
2. What is Uber’s share in other key countries?
3. What are the lawsuits investors should watch out for?
4. How do Uber’s revenue drivers compare with Lyft’s?
5. What are the timelines and key figures for both companies’ IPOs?

This is the third note in a series about the expected 2019 IPO of global ride-hailing giant Uber Technologies (0084207D US) and Lyft. Please read the earlier two pieces in the series for better contexts:

Uber IPO Preview: Its Sprawling Empire and Battle Lines (Part 1) written by me.

Uber IPO Preview: Fast-Growing Uber Eats Has Become a Material Part of Uber (Part 2) written by Daniel Hellberg

4. Okinawa Cellular (9436 JP): Warm Tropical Breezes with KDDI

As the colder winter weather is felt and the icy blast of industry tariff cuts continues to chill sentiment, we seek some respite (at least mentally) in the warmer climes of Okinawa. Okinawa Cellular is a unique company. It’s a small cap telecom network operator in Japan with a focus on the sub-tropical islands of Okinawa Prefecture. As part of the KDDI group, the company benefits from its parent’s economies of scale, but with its local presence, it also benefits from being the hometown hero. 

Because the stock is relatively small, from an investment perspective it runs into liquidity constraints that the other telcos do not have, so it’s a different type of investment but one that we think is worth looking at. Over the past 12 months Okinawa Cellular’s stock has fallen by 12.3%, but over the past year the stock has delivered a return in the middle of its peer group and has outperformed the broad TOPIX by about 5.5%. Like most telcos, Okinawa Cellular is also ramping its dividend payments, and the current yield is about 3.5%.

5. GMO Internet (9447 JP) – Grossly or Modestly Overrated?

Source: Japan Analytics

THE GMO INTERNET (9449 JP) STORY – GMO internet (GMO-i) has attracted much attention in the last eighteen months from an unusual trinity of value, activist and ‘cryptocurrency’ equity investors.

• VALUE– Many traditional, but mostly foreign, value investors have seen the persistent negative difference between GMO-i’s market capitalisation and the value of the company’s holdings in its eight listed consolidated subsidiaries as an opportunity to invest in GMO-i with a considerable ‘margin of safety’.
• ACTIVIST – Since July 2017, the activist investor, Oasis, has waged a so-far-unsuccessful campaign with the aim of improving GMO’s corporate governance, removing takeover defences, addressing a ‘secularly undervalued stock price we are not able to tolerate’ (sic), and redefining the role and influence of the company’s Chairman, President, Representative Director and largest shareholder, Masatoshi Kumagai.
• ‘CRYPTO!’ – In December 2017, GMO-i committed to spending more than ¥35b or 10% of non-current assets. The aim was threefold: to set up a bitcoin ‘mining’ headquarters in Switzerland (with the ‘mining’ operations being carried out at an undisclosed location in Scandinavia), to develop proprietary state-of-the-art 7nm-node ‘mining chips’, and, in due course, to sell GMO-branded and developed ‘mining’ machines. The move was hailed in the ‘crypto’ fraternity as GMO-i became the largest non-Chinese and the first well-established Internet conglomerate to make a major investment in ‘cryptocurrency’ infrastructure.

OUTSTANDING – Following the December 2017 announcement, trading volumes spiked into ‘Overtraded’ territory – as measured by our Volume Score. Many investors saw GMO-i shares as a safer way of gaining exposure to ‘cryptocurrencies’, even as the price of bitcoin began to subside. By early June 2018, GMO-i’s shares had reached a closing price of ¥3,020: up 157% from the low of the prior year and outperforming TOPIX by 135%. Whatever the primary driver of this outstanding performance, each of our trio of investor groups no doubt felt vindicated in their approach to the stock.

CRYPTO CLOSURE – On December 25th 2018, GMO-i’s shares reached a new 52-week low of ¥1,325, a decline of 56% from the June high. Year to date, GMO-i shares have now declined by 31%, underperforming TOPIX by nine percentage points. On the same day, GMO-i announced that the company would post an extraordinary ¥35.5b loss for the fourth quarter, incurring an impairment loss of ¥11.5b in relation to the closure of the Swiss ‘mining’ headquarters and a loss of ¥24b to cover the closure of the ‘mining chip’ and ‘mining machine’ development, manufacturing and sales businesses. GMO-i will continue to ‘mine’ bitcoin from its Tokyo headquarters and intends to relocate the ‘mining’ centre from Scandinavia to (sic) ‘a region that will allow us to secure cleaner and less expensive power supply, but we have not yet decided the details’. Unlisted subsidiary GMO Coin’s ‘cryptocurrency’ exchange will also continue to operate, and the previously-announced plans to launch a ¥-based ‘stablecoin’ in 2019 will proceed. In the two trading days following this announcement, the shares have recovered 13% to ¥1,505. 

RAIDING THE LISTCO PIGGY BANK – As we shall relate, this is the second time since listing that GMO-i has written off a significant new business venture which the company had commenced only a short time before. In both cases, the company was forced to sell stakes in its listed consolidated subsidiaries to offset the resulting losses. On this occasion, the sale of shares in GMO Financial (7177 JP) (GMO-F) on September 25 2018, and GMO Payment Gateway (3769 JP) (GMO-PG) on December 17 2018, raised a combined ¥55.6b and, after the deduction of the yet-to-be-determined tax on the realised gains, should more than offset the ‘crypto’ losses. According to CFO Yasuda, any surplus from this exercise will be used to pay down debt. Also discussed below and in keeping with this GMO-i ‘MO’, in 2015, the company twice sold shares in its listed subsidiaries to ‘smooth out’ less-than-desirable operating results.

In this briefing:

1. COM7 (COM7 TB): Acquisition to Support Aggressive Expansion
2. TRACKING TRAFFIC/Chinese Express & Logistics: Parcel Pricing Weak, Again
3. Elastic: Why Is It Outperforming In Recent Tech Carnage?

1. COM7 (COM7 TB): Acquisition to Support Aggressive Expansion

• Improving asset turnover, good risk adjusted price momentum, and relatively strong analyst recommendations relative to its sector
• Larger distribution channel through acquisition of DNA Retail Link to add 95 more stores to current 518 stores
• New mobile product launches in 4Q18 and COM7’s focus on high margin products, such as Android smartphones, should support high earnings growth which was up 56% YoY in 3Q18
• Attractive at a 19CE* PEG of 0.9 versus ASEAN sector at a PEG of 2.7
• Risks: Lower-than-expected demand for new IT products, slower-than-expected store expansions

* Consensus Estimates

2. TRACKING TRAFFIC/Chinese Express & Logistics: Parcel Pricing Weak, Again

Tracking Traffic/Chinese Express & Logistics is the hub for our research on China’s express parcels and logistics sectors. Tracking Traffic/Chinese Express & Logistics features analysis of monthly Chinese express and logistics data, notes from our conversations with industry players, and links to company and thematic notes. 

This month’s issue covers the following topics:

3. Elastic: Why Is It Outperforming In Recent Tech Carnage?

• Elastic NV (ESTC US) has been one of the best tech IPOs globally in 2018. Its current price is $62.53, up 74% from its IPO price of $36. Elastic’s share price has been holding up very nicely since its IPO on October 5th, 2018. Meanwhile, from October 5th to December 21st 2018, many tech stocks have experienced brutal declines. Elastic’s ability to outperform the top US tech stocks in a very difficult environment for the stock market sets the stage for a continued out-performance once the stock market starts to stabilize. 
• Since the IPO, the company reported better than expected second quarter results (quarter ending October 31, 2018) on December 4th. The company’s adjusted net loss in FY2Q19 was $0.38 per share, beating analysts’ consensus estimate by 9 cents. It generated revenue of $63.6 million, up 72% YoY. Calculated billings were also strong at $88.5 million, up 73% YoY. 
• The company’s guidance for FY3Q19 (quarter ending January 31, 2019) is to generate revenue in the range of $64 million to $66 million, representing a 56% YoY growth rate at the midpoint of the guidance. It expects to generate operating margin of negative 28% to negative 30% in FY3Q19. 
• A combination of major investors shifting their assets away from FAANG and semiconductor stocks has resulted in some improved performance of many software related stocks in recent months relative to other major tech stocks. In general, these stocks face less negative impact from a prolonged trade war between China and the US. Plus, they are not as exposed to the higher cycle volatility as the semiconductor related stocks. In many respects, Elastic shares many business similarities with these software driven companies, and thus has been more immune from the decline in the stock prices since early October. We remain positive on Elastic NV (ESTC US).

In this briefing:

1. 58.com Inc. (NYSE: WUBA): Regulatory Pressure Has Long Term Implications
2. MYOB (MYO AU): Shareholders Are Caught Between a Rock and a Hard Place
3. Infosys Ltd (INFO IN): Another Buyback Coming? Not a Bad Idea, but How Much It Can Really Help?
4. SoftBank Corp (9434 JP) & Arteria Networks (4423 JP): A Tale of Two IPOs
5. MYOB Caves And Agrees To KKR’s Reduced Offer

1. 58.com Inc. (NYSE: WUBA): Regulatory Pressure Has Long Term Implications

● We notice that Anjuke’s Oct.-Nov. traffic declined. We attribute this decline to the tightening of registration requirement in various cities, which will reduce the number of housing leads on WUBA platform;

● We, however, believe new home business will deliver strong revenue for WUBA this year, contributing Rmb2bn in revenues by our estimate;

● We rate the stock Buy and cut TP from US$84 to US$79.

2. MYOB (MYO AU): Shareholders Are Caught Between a Rock and a Hard Place

On 24 December, MYOB Group Ltd (MYO AU) announced that it entered into a scheme implementation agreement under which KKR will acquire MYOB at $3.40 per share, which is 10% lower than 2 November offer price of A$3.77. MYOB claims its decision to recommend KKR’s lower offer was based on current market uncertainty, long-term nature of its strategic growth plans and the go-shop provisions of the deal. 

3. Infosys Ltd (INFO IN): Another Buyback Coming? Not a Bad Idea, but How Much It Can Really Help?

As per reports, Infosys Ltd (INFO IN) may consider a proposal for a share buyback of $1.60 billion very soon. The buyback announcement is likely to be made on January 11 when the company board meets to consider the 3Q FY19 results. Before this, in November 2017, Infosys Ltd (INFO IN) had announced a buyback and spent Rs130 bn to buy a total of 113mn equity shares. This fresh buyback could be an important development and could be an important support for the stock, it is also sensible for other reasons. 

There are no major acquisitions in recent times by Infosys Ltd (INFO IN) and if this is likely to be the trend for near future, share buyback is not a bad idea. The company is still struggling with some of the legacy issues and the priority as of now is to streamline the organic growth. We think Infosys Ltd (INFO IN) is also cautious with inorganic growth opportunities as the company had serious issues with acquisitions in the past. What could be another key driver behind this is that in valuation terms, Infosys Ltd (INFO IN) is not very expensive.

4. SoftBank Corp (9434 JP) & Arteria Networks (4423 JP): A Tale of Two IPOs

During the second half of December 2018, Japan saw two telecom companies list on the Tokyo Stock Exchange: Softbank Corp (9434 JP) and ARTERIA Networks (4423 JP). After years of industry consolidation, which saw several stocks delist, this felt like a Christmas miracle (at least for those watching the sector’s stocks).

It would be hard to find two companies in the same industry that are so different – both in their business models as well as in how their IPOs were positioned to investors. One stock is 100 times larger than the other, but this is not a story of David and Goliath. It is two unique stories in parallel. 

While each company took a very different approach to selling its stock, both have suffered from the subsequent broader market weakness, irrespective of company specifics. We can’t say it has been the worst of times, but it certainly has been a tough time with SoftBank Corp down 13% and Arteria down 20% from their IPO prices.

In this Insight we explore how each company approached its IPO and how each has fared since. 

5. MYOB Caves And Agrees To KKR’s Reduced Offer

It could have gone either way.

After securing a 19.9% stake from Bain in early October and initially pitching A$3.70/share, in a textbook bear hug, KKR (marginally) bumped its indicative offer to A$3.77/share to a get a look under the hood, then following seven weeks of due diligence, backtracked with a lower price of A$3.40/share, citing adverse market conditions.

MYOB Board’s response last week to the reduced offer was to inform KKR that it is not in a position to recommend the revised proposal, however, “it remains in discussions with KKR regarding its proposal”, leaving the door open for ongoing negotiations. KKR for its part, said there were no landmines following the DD process. The price action last Friday suggested the outcome was a coin toss.

Today, KKR and MYOB entered into Scheme Implementation Agreement (SIA) at $3.40/share, valuing MYOB, on a market cap basis, at A$2bn. MYOB’s board unanimously recommends shareholders to vote in favour of the Offer, in the absence of a superior proposal and subject to an independent expert concluding the Offer is in the best interest of shareholders. The Offer price assumes no full-year dividend is paid.

The agreement provides a “go shop” provision until the 22 February 2019 – when MYOB is expected to release its FY18 results – to solicit competing proposals.

The Offer appears reasonable when compared to peers and with regards to the 14% decline in the ASX technology index; but conversely, could be construed as being opportunistic.

A Scheme Booklet is expected to be dispatched mid-March with an estimated implementation date of 3 May. Currently trading at a 3.8%/11% gross/annualised spread. 1 January makes a new year and there will be investors who would want to take an agreed deal at 11%.

In this briefing:

1. Elastic: Why Is It Outperforming In Recent Tech Carnage?

1. Elastic: Why Is It Outperforming In Recent Tech Carnage?

• Elastic NV (ESTC US) has been one of the best tech IPOs globally in 2018. Its current price is $62.53, up 74% from its IPO price of $36. Elastic’s share price has been holding up very nicely since its IPO on October 5th, 2018. Meanwhile, from October 5th to December 21st 2018, many tech stocks have experienced brutal declines. Elastic’s ability to outperform the top US tech stocks in a very difficult environment for the stock market sets the stage for a continued out-performance once the stock market starts to stabilize. 
• Since the IPO, the company reported better than expected second quarter results (quarter ending October 31, 2018) on December 4th. The company’s adjusted net loss in FY2Q19 was $0.38 per share, beating analysts’ consensus estimate by 9 cents. It generated revenue of $63.6 million, up 72% YoY. Calculated billings were also strong at $88.5 million, up 73% YoY. 
• The company’s guidance for FY3Q19 (quarter ending January 31, 2019) is to generate revenue in the range of $64 million to $66 million, representing a 56% YoY growth rate at the midpoint of the guidance. It expects to generate operating margin of negative 28% to negative 30% in FY3Q19. 
• A combination of major investors shifting their assets away from FAANG and semiconductor stocks has resulted in some improved performance of many software related stocks in recent months relative to other major tech stocks. In general, these stocks face less negative impact from a prolonged trade war between China and the US. Plus, they are not as exposed to the higher cycle volatility as the semiconductor related stocks. In many respects, Elastic shares many business similarities with these software driven companies, and thus has been more immune from the decline in the stock prices since early October. We remain positive on Elastic NV (ESTC US).

In this briefing:

1. Uber IPO: Its Sprawling Empire And Battle Lines (Part 3)
2. Okinawa Cellular (9436 JP): Warm Tropical Breezes with KDDI
3. GMO Internet (9447 JP) – Grossly or Modestly Overrated?
4. 58.com Inc. (NYSE: WUBA): Regulatory Pressure Has Long Term Implications
5. MYOB (MYO AU): Shareholders Are Caught Between a Rock and a Hard Place

1. Uber IPO: Its Sprawling Empire And Battle Lines (Part 3)

Although Uber aims to be an Amazon for transport, we will focus on the ride-hailing market in part 3 of this series. Here, we try to answer the following questions:

1. What are the indicative ride-hailing market shares of Uber vs Lyft in North America?
2. What is Uber’s share in other key countries?
3. What are the lawsuits investors should watch out for?
4. How do Uber’s revenue drivers compare with Lyft’s?
5. What are the timelines and key figures for both companies’ IPOs?

This is the third note in a series about the expected 2019 IPO of global ride-hailing giant Uber Technologies (0084207D US) and Lyft. Please read the earlier two pieces in the series for better contexts:

Uber IPO Preview: Its Sprawling Empire and Battle Lines (Part 1) written by me.

Uber IPO Preview: Fast-Growing Uber Eats Has Become a Material Part of Uber (Part 2) written by Daniel Hellberg

2. Okinawa Cellular (9436 JP): Warm Tropical Breezes with KDDI

As the colder winter weather is felt and the icy blast of industry tariff cuts continues to chill sentiment, we seek some respite (at least mentally) in the warmer climes of Okinawa. Okinawa Cellular is a unique company. It’s a small cap telecom network operator in Japan with a focus on the sub-tropical islands of Okinawa Prefecture. As part of the KDDI group, the company benefits from its parent’s economies of scale, but with its local presence, it also benefits from being the hometown hero. 

Because the stock is relatively small, from an investment perspective it runs into liquidity constraints that the other telcos do not have, so it’s a different type of investment but one that we think is worth looking at. Over the past 12 months Okinawa Cellular’s stock has fallen by 12.3%, but over the past year the stock has delivered a return in the middle of its peer group and has outperformed the broad TOPIX by about 5.5%. Like most telcos, Okinawa Cellular is also ramping its dividend payments, and the current yield is about 3.5%.

3. GMO Internet (9447 JP) – Grossly or Modestly Overrated?

Source: Japan Analytics

THE GMO INTERNET (9449 JP) STORY – GMO internet (GMO-i) has attracted much attention in the last eighteen months from an unusual trinity of value, activist and ‘cryptocurrency’ equity investors.

• VALUE– Many traditional, but mostly foreign, value investors have seen the persistent negative difference between GMO-i’s market capitalisation and the value of the company’s holdings in its eight listed consolidated subsidiaries as an opportunity to invest in GMO-i with a considerable ‘margin of safety’.
• ACTIVIST – Since July 2017, the activist investor, Oasis, has waged a so-far-unsuccessful campaign with the aim of improving GMO’s corporate governance, removing takeover defences, addressing a ‘secularly undervalued stock price we are not able to tolerate’ (sic), and redefining the role and influence of the company’s Chairman, President, Representative Director and largest shareholder, Masatoshi Kumagai.
• ‘CRYPTO!’ – In December 2017, GMO-i committed to spending more than ¥35b or 10% of non-current assets. The aim was threefold: to set up a bitcoin ‘mining’ headquarters in Switzerland (with the ‘mining’ operations being carried out at an undisclosed location in Scandinavia), to develop proprietary state-of-the-art 7nm-node ‘mining chips’, and, in due course, to sell GMO-branded and developed ‘mining’ machines. The move was hailed in the ‘crypto’ fraternity as GMO-i became the largest non-Chinese and the first well-established Internet conglomerate to make a major investment in ‘cryptocurrency’ infrastructure.

OUTSTANDING – Following the December 2017 announcement, trading volumes spiked into ‘Overtraded’ territory – as measured by our Volume Score. Many investors saw GMO-i shares as a safer way of gaining exposure to ‘cryptocurrencies’, even as the price of bitcoin began to subside. By early June 2018, GMO-i’s shares had reached a closing price of ¥3,020: up 157% from the low of the prior year and outperforming TOPIX by 135%. Whatever the primary driver of this outstanding performance, each of our trio of investor groups no doubt felt vindicated in their approach to the stock.

CRYPTO CLOSURE – On December 25th 2018, GMO-i’s shares reached a new 52-week low of ¥1,325, a decline of 56% from the June high. Year to date, GMO-i shares have now declined by 31%, underperforming TOPIX by nine percentage points. On the same day, GMO-i announced that the company would post an extraordinary ¥35.5b loss for the fourth quarter, incurring an impairment loss of ¥11.5b in relation to the closure of the Swiss ‘mining’ headquarters and a loss of ¥24b to cover the closure of the ‘mining chip’ and ‘mining machine’ development, manufacturing and sales businesses. GMO-i will continue to ‘mine’ bitcoin from its Tokyo headquarters and intends to relocate the ‘mining’ centre from Scandinavia to (sic) ‘a region that will allow us to secure cleaner and less expensive power supply, but we have not yet decided the details’. Unlisted subsidiary GMO Coin’s ‘cryptocurrency’ exchange will also continue to operate, and the previously-announced plans to launch a ¥-based ‘stablecoin’ in 2019 will proceed. In the two trading days following this announcement, the shares have recovered 13% to ¥1,505. 

RAIDING THE LISTCO PIGGY BANK – As we shall relate, this is the second time since listing that GMO-i has written off a significant new business venture which the company had commenced only a short time before. In both cases, the company was forced to sell stakes in its listed consolidated subsidiaries to offset the resulting losses. On this occasion, the sale of shares in GMO Financial (7177 JP) (GMO-F) on September 25 2018, and GMO Payment Gateway (3769 JP) (GMO-PG) on December 17 2018, raised a combined ¥55.6b and, after the deduction of the yet-to-be-determined tax on the realised gains, should more than offset the ‘crypto’ losses. According to CFO Yasuda, any surplus from this exercise will be used to pay down debt. Also discussed below and in keeping with this GMO-i ‘MO’, in 2015, the company twice sold shares in its listed subsidiaries to ‘smooth out’ less-than-desirable operating results.

4. 58.com Inc. (NYSE: WUBA): Regulatory Pressure Has Long Term Implications

● We notice that Anjuke’s Oct.-Nov. traffic declined. We attribute this decline to the tightening of registration requirement in various cities, which will reduce the number of housing leads on WUBA platform;

● We, however, believe new home business will deliver strong revenue for WUBA this year, contributing Rmb2bn in revenues by our estimate;

● We rate the stock Buy and cut TP from US$84 to US$79.

5. MYOB (MYO AU): Shareholders Are Caught Between a Rock and a Hard Place

On 24 December, MYOB Group Ltd (MYO AU) announced that it entered into a scheme implementation agreement under which KKR will acquire MYOB at $3.40 per share, which is 10% lower than 2 November offer price of A$3.77. MYOB claims its decision to recommend KKR’s lower offer was based on current market uncertainty, long-term nature of its strategic growth plans and the go-shop provisions of the deal. 

In this briefing:

1. Infosys Ltd (INFO IN): Another Buyback Coming? Not a Bad Idea, but How Much It Can Really Help?
2. SoftBank Corp (9434 JP) & Arteria Networks (4423 JP): A Tale of Two IPOs
3. MYOB Caves And Agrees To KKR’s Reduced Offer
4. COM7 (COM7 TB): Acquisition to Support Aggressive Expansion
5. TRACKING TRAFFIC/Chinese Express & Logistics: Parcel Pricing Weak, Again

1. Infosys Ltd (INFO IN): Another Buyback Coming? Not a Bad Idea, but How Much It Can Really Help?

As per reports, Infosys Ltd (INFO IN) may consider a proposal for a share buyback of $1.60 billion very soon. The buyback announcement is likely to be made on January 11 when the company board meets to consider the 3Q FY19 results. Before this, in November 2017, Infosys Ltd (INFO IN) had announced a buyback and spent Rs130 bn to buy a total of 113mn equity shares. This fresh buyback could be an important development and could be an important support for the stock, it is also sensible for other reasons. 

There are no major acquisitions in recent times by Infosys Ltd (INFO IN) and if this is likely to be the trend for near future, share buyback is not a bad idea. The company is still struggling with some of the legacy issues and the priority as of now is to streamline the organic growth. We think Infosys Ltd (INFO IN) is also cautious with inorganic growth opportunities as the company had serious issues with acquisitions in the past. What could be another key driver behind this is that in valuation terms, Infosys Ltd (INFO IN) is not very expensive.

2. SoftBank Corp (9434 JP) & Arteria Networks (4423 JP): A Tale of Two IPOs

During the second half of December 2018, Japan saw two telecom companies list on the Tokyo Stock Exchange: Softbank Corp (9434 JP) and ARTERIA Networks (4423 JP). After years of industry consolidation, which saw several stocks delist, this felt like a Christmas miracle (at least for those watching the sector’s stocks).

It would be hard to find two companies in the same industry that are so different – both in their business models as well as in how their IPOs were positioned to investors. One stock is 100 times larger than the other, but this is not a story of David and Goliath. It is two unique stories in parallel. 

While each company took a very different approach to selling its stock, both have suffered from the subsequent broader market weakness, irrespective of company specifics. We can’t say it has been the worst of times, but it certainly has been a tough time with SoftBank Corp down 13% and Arteria down 20% from their IPO prices.

In this Insight we explore how each company approached its IPO and how each has fared since. 

3. MYOB Caves And Agrees To KKR’s Reduced Offer

It could have gone either way.

After securing a 19.9% stake from Bain in early October and initially pitching A$3.70/share, in a textbook bear hug, KKR (marginally) bumped its indicative offer to A$3.77/share to a get a look under the hood, then following seven weeks of due diligence, backtracked with a lower price of A$3.40/share, citing adverse market conditions.

MYOB Board’s response last week to the reduced offer was to inform KKR that it is not in a position to recommend the revised proposal, however, “it remains in discussions with KKR regarding its proposal”, leaving the door open for ongoing negotiations. KKR for its part, said there were no landmines following the DD process. The price action last Friday suggested the outcome was a coin toss.

Today, KKR and MYOB entered into Scheme Implementation Agreement (SIA) at $3.40/share, valuing MYOB, on a market cap basis, at A$2bn. MYOB’s board unanimously recommends shareholders to vote in favour of the Offer, in the absence of a superior proposal and subject to an independent expert concluding the Offer is in the best interest of shareholders. The Offer price assumes no full-year dividend is paid.

The agreement provides a “go shop” provision until the 22 February 2019 – when MYOB is expected to release its FY18 results – to solicit competing proposals.

The Offer appears reasonable when compared to peers and with regards to the 14% decline in the ASX technology index; but conversely, could be construed as being opportunistic.

A Scheme Booklet is expected to be dispatched mid-March with an estimated implementation date of 3 May. Currently trading at a 3.8%/11% gross/annualised spread. 1 January makes a new year and there will be investors who would want to take an agreed deal at 11%.

4. COM7 (COM7 TB): Acquisition to Support Aggressive Expansion

• Improving asset turnover, good risk adjusted price momentum, and relatively strong analyst recommendations relative to its sector
• Larger distribution channel through acquisition of DNA Retail Link to add 95 more stores to current 518 stores
• New mobile product launches in 4Q18 and COM7’s focus on high margin products, such as Android smartphones, should support high earnings growth which was up 56% YoY in 3Q18
• Attractive at a 19CE* PEG of 0.9 versus ASEAN sector at a PEG of 2.7
• Risks: Lower-than-expected demand for new IT products, slower-than-expected store expansions

* Consensus Estimates

5. TRACKING TRAFFIC/Chinese Express & Logistics: Parcel Pricing Weak, Again

Tracking Traffic/Chinese Express & Logistics is the hub for our research on China’s express parcels and logistics sectors. Tracking Traffic/Chinese Express & Logistics features analysis of monthly Chinese express and logistics data, notes from our conversations with industry players, and links to company and thematic notes. 

This month’s issue covers the following topics:

In this briefing:

1. Elastic: Why Is It Outperforming In Recent Tech Carnage?
2. Friday Deadline Looms As MYOB Snubs KKR’s Reduced Offer
3. Korean Government and Hyundai Motor Group’s Grand Ambitions to Expand Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicles
4. NTT Buybacks Will Roll On
5. Softbank Corp: When Does It Become a Buy?

1. Elastic: Why Is It Outperforming In Recent Tech Carnage?

• Elastic NV (ESTC US) has been one of the best tech IPOs globally in 2018. Its current price is $62.53, up 74% from its IPO price of $36. Elastic’s share price has been holding up very nicely since its IPO on October 5th, 2018. Meanwhile, from October 5th to December 21st 2018, many tech stocks have experienced brutal declines. Elastic’s ability to outperform the top US tech stocks in a very difficult environment for the stock market sets the stage for a continued out-performance once the stock market starts to stabilize. 
• Since the IPO, the company reported better than expected second quarter results (quarter ending October 31, 2018) on December 4th. The company’s adjusted net loss in FY2Q19 was $0.38 per share, beating analysts’ consensus estimate by 9 cents. It generated revenue of $63.6 million, up 72% YoY. Calculated billings were also strong at $88.5 million, up 73% YoY. 
• The company’s guidance for FY3Q19 (quarter ending January 31, 2019) is to generate revenue in the range of $64 million to $66 million, representing a 56% YoY growth rate at the midpoint of the guidance. It expects to generate operating margin of negative 28% to negative 30% in FY3Q19. 
• A combination of major investors shifting their assets away from FAANG and semiconductor stocks has resulted in some improved performance of many software related stocks in recent months relative to other major tech stocks. In general, these stocks face less negative impact from a prolonged trade war between China and the US. Plus, they are not as exposed to the higher cycle volatility as the semiconductor related stocks. In many respects, Elastic shares many business similarities with these software driven companies, and thus has been more immune from the decline in the stock prices since early October. We remain positive on Elastic NV (ESTC US).

2. Friday Deadline Looms As MYOB Snubs KKR’s Reduced Offer

A last-minute lump of coal in the stocking from accounting software and services provider MYOB Group Ltd (MYO AU)?

Kohlberg Kravis Roberts has reduced its indicative offer to $3.40 from $3.77 after sifting through MYOB’s books, with MYOB announcing:

Following completion of due diligence and finalisation of debt funding commitments, KKR has revised the offer price to $3.40 per share. …  The board has informed KKR that it is not in a position to recommend the revised proposal, however it remains in discussions with KKR regarding its proposal. (my emphasis)

KKR’s revised non-binding proposal is scheduled to expire at 5pm Friday, providing a day and change for MYOB to sound out shareholders as to the next move. Either the lower tilt is grudgingly accepted, or MYOB rejects and KKR walks away (for now), or goes hostile.

Either way, with MYOB’s VWAP above the revised proposal on all but 6 days since the initial announcement on the 8 October and $3.47/share on average, there won’t be a lot of Ho Ho Ho’ing.

Shares are down 11% as I type, implying 13% upside and 11% downside (using the ASX performance-adjusted price) or ~18% downside when pegged to peers. That’s not an attractive risk/reward heading into year-end.

3. Korean Government and Hyundai Motor Group’s Grand Ambitions to Expand Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicles

• On December 18th, the Korean government announced numerous measures to reduce fine dust levels, including a significant increase in the number of hydrogen powered vehicles, including expanding hydrogen vehicles to 65,000 units by 2022 (cumulative). 
• The Korean government wants to encourage the growth of hydrogen powered economy and position the country as one of the global leaders in this segment. The Korean government plans to spend about 3.5 trillion won to support the Korean auto industry. The Korean government’s new plan is to expand the hydrogen vehicles to 65,000 units by 2022, which is a big increase from the previous plan of expanding the hydrogen vehicles to 15,000 units by 2022.
• The Hyundai Motor Group also recently announced a grand plan to expand its fuel cell vehicles with the announcement of its ‘FCEV Vision 2030.’ The Hyundai Motor Group plans to increase its annual production capacity for fuel cell systems to 0.7 million units by 2030, with plans to invest about $7 billion in the next 10 years to develop hydrogen fuel cell systems. 

4. NTT Buybacks Will Roll On

There is an extensive history of writing on the NTT (Nippon Telegraph & Telephone) (9432 JP) family (and indeed Japan telecom sector) buybacks – their modalities and methods, impacts, legal and accounting requirements, competition, push-me-pull-you effect, etc. 

One of the longstanding features of buybacks for NTT is that NTT is subject to the NTT Law which requires (for the moment) that the government hold at least one-third of the shares outstanding in NTT.

Today, the Nikkei carried an article noting that the Japanese government’sFY2019 budget currently being formed proposes a sale of JPY 160bn of shares to help fund any revenue impact from the upcoming consumption tax rate hike from 8% to 10% next October. The article helpfully notes that they plan on selling when NTT is buying back shares.

This news is not unexpected to Smartkarma readers of the ongoing series. And there are implications and read-throughs. 

5. Softbank Corp: When Does It Become a Buy?

Although we were bearish on the IPO initially and turned increasingly so following the relatively poor reception among retailers that was discussed in Softbank IPO: Signs Point to Risk of Early IPO Price Break, we were still a touch surprised at the extent of the drop today, with the stock finishing down 14.53% to close at the lows with 271.5m shares changing hands. With a rising dividend yield and looming buying from passive funds on the on hand and a potentially large overhang from retailers who may have been looking to flip for a profit on the other, we discuss what would turn us more bullish below.

In this briefing:

1. SoftBank Group (9984 JP): SoftBank Corp IPO Has Failed to Meaningfully Narrow the Holdco Discount

1. SoftBank Group (9984 JP): SoftBank Corp IPO Has Failed to Meaningfully Narrow the Holdco Discount

Softbank Group (9984 JP)’s market cap has consistently traded below its NAV. A popular expectation was that the Softbank Corp (9434 JP) IPO should be a catalyst to narrow the conglomerate discount (holdco discount). On its trading debut today, SoftBank Corp’s shares fell 14.5% from its IPO price of JPY1,500 to JPY1,282 per share – the worst first-day decline ever for a major IPO in Japan since the Japan Display (6740 JP) IPO in 2014. 

In this briefing:

1. AsiaInfo Tech (亚信科技) IPO: What You Need to Know Before the Trading Debut

1. AsiaInfo Tech (亚信科技) IPO: What You Need to Know Before the Trading Debut

AsiaInfo Tech priced its IPO at HKD 10.50/share and will start trading today. Prior to the trading debut, in this short note, we summarize the latest information with updates on our valuation. 

Our Previous Insight on AsiaInfo Tech:

• AsiaInfo Tech (亚信科技) IPO: Cost Control Is the Key (Part 1)
• AsiaInfo Tech (亚信科技) IPO: Lessons from Privatization and Three Bearish Trends (Part 2)
• AsiaInfo Tech (亚信科技) IPO: Latest Numbers Showcase the Company’s Questionable Expansion Plan
• AsiaInfo Tech (亚信科技) IPO: Valuation Rich Vs Delisting and Peers