Nvidia Corp (NVDA US) is moving back toward macro chart support levels. If these levels hold there is scope for a basing cycle to unfold that would lead to a positive turn for NVDA. During this process, Advanced Micro Devices (AMD US) will feel additional pressure to test macro support outlined in AMD Buy Support and Tactics . We reiterate macro support levels in this webcast.
NVDA’s MACD reveals a clear cycle – The break below floor support will now act as a ceiling and does telegraph a new and lower trading range.
Our SOX sell call last summer still has a few final touches to complete the major bear cycle with a key low due near May 2019. We are near, but not yet at the cycle trough.
Softbank Group (9984 JP) released the results of its 750mn USD tender for its Euro and USD commercial paper, which could also portend further support for the equity ahead of results next Wednesday. More details below.
With its nationwide fiber optic network infrastructure, NTT continues to dominate the fixed line broadband market in Japan with 68% market share. In this Insight we explore the fixed line broadband market in Japan today and how it is evolving, especially with the increasing dominance of “collaboration” offerings that bundle fiber with mobile services.
Mobile services are getting a lot of attention today, especially in the run up to 5G launches over the coming 12 months, but without fiber backhaul, 5G would be a nonstarter. In this Insight we investigate what 5G will bring and what is needed to support it as well as the telcos’ latest plans.
NTT is not just an incumbent telecom operator, it’s also a key player for future technologies and provides the physical infrastructure and architecture for many of the industries new services.With all the talk about 5G it is sometimes easy to forget that fixed line networks are still necessary. With NTT’s strong fiber-based network and its collaborations with NTT Docomo and many other partners in mobile and data, we believe NTT is well positioned to be a key and winning player in the evolving telecom and technology space.
Intel‘s fourth quarter 2018 results last week missed on earnings to the tune of $360 million. That, combined with a tepid outlook for 2019 YoY growth of just 1% spooked investors, sending the stock down over 5% on three times the normal trading volume the following day.
Lagging process technology leadership, ever increasing competition from ARM, AMD and NVIDIA, lower modem sales as iPhone unit shipments decline, falling NAND prices, data center spending significantly reduced as the hyperscalers digest and optimise their record-breaking build-out will all weigh heavily on the company in the coming quarters.
After a record breaking 2018 which saw the company’s annual revenue grow 13% to edge north of the $70 billion mark for the first time ever, Intel now faces a growing array of headwinds which will dog the company for the Year of the Pig.
Ebang (EBANG HK) is a Chinese designer of bitcoin mining machines which are sold under the Ebit brand. Ebang refiled its draft prospectus with HKEX on 20 December 2018, but the IPO plans of cryptocurrency related companies are in a state of flux. Last week, the CEO of the Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing, said that companies seeking to go public in Hong Kong should show consistency in their business models, in response to questions about the IPO applications of Bitmain Technologies Ltd (1374554D CH), Canaan Inc. (CANAAN HK) and Ebang.
While 1H18 results were strong, Ebang cautions that it experienced significant decreases in revenue and gross profit for 3Q18 compared to 2Q18. In the absence of any 3Q18 financial metrics, we scrutinised the financial accounts to find clues on the extent of the slowdown. Our analysis of the financial accounts’ leading indicators points to a rapid slowdown.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
Intel‘s fourth quarter 2018 results last week missed on earnings to the tune of $360 million. That, combined with a tepid outlook for 2019 YoY growth of just 1% spooked investors, sending the stock down over 5% on three times the normal trading volume the following day.
Lagging process technology leadership, ever increasing competition from ARM, AMD and NVIDIA, lower modem sales as iPhone unit shipments decline, falling NAND prices, data center spending significantly reduced as the hyperscalers digest and optimise their record-breaking build-out will all weigh heavily on the company in the coming quarters.
After a record breaking 2018 which saw the company’s annual revenue grow 13% to edge north of the $70 billion mark for the first time ever, Intel now faces a growing array of headwinds which will dog the company for the Year of the Pig.
Ebang (EBANG HK) is a Chinese designer of bitcoin mining machines which are sold under the Ebit brand. Ebang refiled its draft prospectus with HKEX on 20 December 2018, but the IPO plans of cryptocurrency related companies are in a state of flux. Last week, the CEO of the Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing, said that companies seeking to go public in Hong Kong should show consistency in their business models, in response to questions about the IPO applications of Bitmain Technologies Ltd (1374554D CH), Canaan Inc. (CANAAN HK) and Ebang.
While 1H18 results were strong, Ebang cautions that it experienced significant decreases in revenue and gross profit for 3Q18 compared to 2Q18. In the absence of any 3Q18 financial metrics, we scrutinised the financial accounts to find clues on the extent of the slowdown. Our analysis of the financial accounts’ leading indicators points to a rapid slowdown.
We have been positive on the Chinese telcos, in part due to our thesis that peak 5G capex expectations were too high for China Mobile. That has largely played out as capex expectations have come down and the stock has performed well. The telcos see a steady state approach to 5G capex as the best way forward given the lack of a current business case. However, there are larger forces at work which imply higher capex – the need to support Huawei/ZTE (763 HK) given the moves against Chinese equipment manufacturers internationally, and the likelihood of economic stimulus packages.
It was announced today that Saudi Aramco plans to purchase up to 19.9% stake in Hyundai Oilbank for about 1.8 trillion won from Hyundai Heavy Industries Holdings (267250 KS) (HHIH), which would suggest nearly 9 trillion won in total value for Hyundai Oilbank. The following are the major highlights of the potential investment in Hyundai Oilbank by Saudi Aramco:
Higher dividends for both Hyundai Oilbank and Hyundai Heavy Industries Holdings – At end of 2018, HHIH converted nearly 2 trillion won of capital surplus into retained earnings, which should allow the company to pay out higher dividends. HHIH has already declared that its long term plans include maintaining a 5% dividend yield and more than 70% dividend payout.
Greater Investments in Robotics – HHIH is likely to use a big portion of the proceeds from the sale of its stake in Hyundai Oilbank to further invest in the robotics business.
Our sum-of-the-parts valuation of Hyundai Heavy Industries Holdings suggests a value of 487,000 won, which is 28% higher than current share price.
Samsung Electronics (005930 KS) and SK Hynix Inc (000660 KS) have cleared key resistance levels that open the way for intermediate gains with a ST peak due in late January that will offer better entry points on weakness in February.
The rally from late December is moving into extended territory. Buy volumes have improved as has upside momentum.
This breakout has also induced a tactical buy signal in the Kospi 200 index above the pivotal 278 resistance but breadth is still mixed to weak. We need to see better upside action in the broader market for a sustainable rise in Korea.
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
In spite of a stellar quarter (Q3 FY19), we remain cautious on Zee Entertainment Enterprises (Z IN) and the prospects of broadcasters in India. Hindi GEC is consolidating, and most of the growth is likely to happen in regional channels which remain competitive. Global data suggests ad spends as a % of revenue for many broadcasters and cable operators has been disrupted and couple of year’s down the line, India should be no exception. Contrary to consensus, driven by millennials and non-affordability of second television, cord cutting in India could accelerate sooner than excepted. With an hyper competitive OTT landscape, uncertainty post TRAI Tariff implementations, in an industry suspect to easy value migration, the long term outlook for Zee Entertainment Enterprises (Z IN) and the broadcast Industry warrants attention. The only near term positive for the stock is the potential stake sale to a strategic partner, which is likely to keep the stock price buoyant but only in the near term.
Next week promises to be a large catalyst driven week, with Apple Inc (AAPL US), NTT Docomo Inc (9437 JP) and Tesla Motors (TSLA US) expected to report results, among others. We have provided a list below of the key equity catalysts for next week as well as potential drivers for M&A deals and stubs. If you are interested in importing this directly into Outlook or have any further requests, please let us know.
Our proprietary corporate governance scoring system now covers over 1,985 stocks including over 200 in Korea.
We recently added a coverage of 28 new names in Korea.
The two lowest scores in this group are Samsung Electro-Mechanics and Advanced Process Systems both with scores of 40/100.
The involvement of a former executive at Samsung Electro-Mechanics in the Park scandal and ouster highlights the governance risk.
Companies with good governance include LS Corp, and Lotte Shopping. Past issues with the founding family of Lotte should be noted and taken into consideration. We welcome requests from clients of names they want to see added to the universe.
While Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company‘s Q4 2018 earnings were in line with expectations at ~$9.4 billion, the company’s revenue forecast for Q1 2019 was down 22% sequentially to $7.3 billion. TSMC predicts a tepid 2019 with semiconductor growth of 1%, down from ~6% last year. Like many of its peers, TSMC sees challenges relating to inventory overhang, waning smartphone unit sales and global macro uncertainty weighing on the company in the first half and expects business to recover to modest growth in the second half. The bottom line is that the company anticipates a no-to-low growth year of the Pig.
In spite of the downbeat outlook for the year, the company reiterated its belief that it will hit its 5-10% growth CAGR through 2021. To meet that goal, it is clear that TSMC now expects both 2020 and 2021 to be double digit growth years and, as we outlined in our SmartKarma Originals report A Bull Investment Case for TSMC (In-Depth Version), much of that growth will come from TSMC’s new-found markets for processors and AI acceleration in the data center.
From a process technology leadership perspective, a fundamental tenet of our bull case for the company, TSMC noted that its 7nm process accounted for a staggering 23% of revenues in the fourth quarter, 7nm+ (with EUV) is on track for volume ramp in the second quarter and 5nm remains on track to follow just one year later.
Investors shrugged of the negative outlook for the year with the company’s share price barely registering the news. We reiterate our bullish stance on the stock and our growth CAGR of 8.36% through 2022.
Kabu.com shares were bid limit up all day long and closed at ¥462, which is a 10+ year closing high.
The idea is not a new one. The mobile telecommunications market in Japan is mature, and one of the few ways Type 1 telecom providers can grow is by adding content through the “pipes.”
KDDI already has an investment in an online banking 50/50 joint venture with MUFG called Jibun Bank (“My Bank” or “Myself Bank”) which it launched in 2008. KDDI established a smartphone-based asset management service with Daiwa Securities Group (8601 JP) just under a year ago, where KDDI owns 66.6% and Daiwa 33.4%. This was to attract younger customers to savings products accessible through an app in order to make those customers stickier over the long-term. KDDI also bought into Lifenet Insurance Co (7157 JP) in 2015 through a capital raise, and is now its largest shareholder at just over 25% (a decent (and recent) presentation of the company is here). About six months ago, KDDI injected ¥6bn (link is Japanese) into Japanese financial services company Finatext to help spark their new service of a ¥0 commission brokerage. I would note that Finatext and partner (now sub) NOWCAST launched an algorithmic personal asset management advisory service using for kabu.com Securities in 2016.
Owning a stake in a broker would go a long ways towards providing comprehensive financial services access by smartphone under a KDDI-owned profit umbrella.
Is a deal like this feasible? Reasonable? Likely?
The two companies’ first response was pretty standard. This was the version from KDDI:
KDDI is considering various possibilities in financial business with kabu.com Securities, however, there is no determined facts. [a better translation of the Japanese is “however… no decisions have been made”]
This is pretty standard in Japanese corporate “clarifications.” There are, in fact, no ‘decisions’ unless a board meeting has been convened and put their stamp on it.
But the Japanese market will look at a comment like this and figure that where there is smoke there is fire.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
In this version of the GER weekly events wrap, we assess the recent lock-up expiry for Pinduoduo (PDD US) which may have led to a short squeeze. Secondly, we assess the debt tender for Softbank Group (9984 JP) which may be supporting the equity. Finally, we provide updates on bids for M1 Ltd (M1 SP) and Healthscope Ltd (HSO AU) as well as update a list of upcoming M&A and equity bottom-up catalysts.
The rest of our event-driven research can be found below.
Best of luck for the new week – Rickin, Venkat and Arun
Korea’s local news outlet reported that Saudi Aramco agrees to buy a 15~20% stake in Hyundai Oilbank Co Ltd (1082Z KS) in a pre-IPO deal. Aramco has reported priced Oilbank at ₩10tril. Hyundai Heavy Industries Holdings (267250 KS) is currently at a 50% discount to NAV. Assuming no change in Oilbank’s ₩10tril value reaffirmed by Aramco, this is like a 6%p drop in two months.
At this much holdco discount, I’d go long HHIH on the Aramco deal. This will make enough cash injection to Holdco. Oilbank’s ₩10tril valuation stays intact despite the recent de-valuation of the local peers on falling oil prices.
Holdco is basically 70% Oilbank and 30% HHI. I’d first pick Hyundai Heavy Industries (009540 KS) for 30%. The HHIH/HHI duo is at 20D MA. But on 120D horizon, they are pretty closer to the lowest. For the other 70%, I’d short SK Innovation (096770 KS). SK Innovation has been less price corrected lately compared with S Oil. On a 20D MA, the HHIH/SK Innovation duo is close to -1σ.
On 30 August 2018, TPG Telecom Ltd (TPM AU) announced the recommended merger of equals with Vodafone Hutchison Australia (VHA). The consensus view was that the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) would approve the merger before the release of ACCC’s statement of issues. However, recent events suggest that regulatory approval from the ACCC is far from a sure thing.
We believe that TPG’s current share price provides limited upside should the ACCC approve the merger. On the other hand, there is material downside risk should the ACCC block the merger. Consequently, the risk-reward is skewed towards the downside.
This is the list of the realistically tradable prefs in Korea. Korea has a total 116 perfs. I filtered them by > ₩100bil market cap and > ₩0.2bil DTV. This filtering gives a total 23 pairs for share class trade. It is generally shown that dividend yield difference and liquidity affect pref discount. The higher div yield difference and the higher liquidity are, the less pref discount is.
Two names are currently catching my eye. Samsung E-M had a major recovery move last Friday mainly on bargain hunting. The duo made +2σ jump in one single day. Common/pref price ratio is now at 142% of σ. This much premium for Common is something we haven’t seen in nearly 6 months. The recent price rally should be more of a sentimental boost. Short-term correction should be expected.
CJ CheilJedang is also an interesting one here. The duo made -1.3σ jump last Friday. They are now at -185% of σ. Common/pref price ratio is currently close to 120D low on a 20D MA. The shares have been drifting sideways for almost a year now. There is no signal indicating any distinct trend that will break this sideways drift. This duo is also expected to see a quick mean reversion.
2018 full results due on the 18th February 2019: Since our initial report on 3rd September 2018, SIQ’s share price has declined some 21% versus the ASX All Ordinaries fall of circa 8%. With results due, we expect the market to refocus on Smartgroup and its good growth story. This is important as much of the focus for the group in the last two years has been on the acquisitions being made. To see management return focus to organic growth, post these acquisitions should help investor confidence in SIQ. Specifically concentrating on the cross-selling of its services whilst benefiting from Australia’s tight labour market and corporates chasing incremental cost savings can only be positives.
Review and upgrade to forecasts: With the benefit of further time to review SIQ’s business progress and the composition of our forecasts, we have increased fiscal 2018 and 2019 EPS forecasts 10% and 12% respectively. Much of our thought process is at the SG&A line, whilst the view that the overall trajectory of earnings remains on track.
2019 we expect to be a year of consolidation, with consistent growth: In the two years to the end of fiscal 2017, SIQ had made six acquisitions. These acquisitions were aimed at both industry consolidation, as well as complementary product build out. We expect 2019 to be a year where the benefits from these acquisitions are exhibited in both the bottom and top-line growth. We expect this even though 2019 may present macro challenges.
We reiterate our view that SIQ offers Growth at a Reasonable price: SIQ’s forward multiples are positive for a company which has posted a long term book value growth rate of circa 7%(net of dividend) and is forecast to post a similar rate 2019 and in 2020. Based on our 2019 EPS forecasts SIQ should be able to deliver circa A$0.62/share, which implies 18% YoY growth and a 13 times P/E.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
On December 17th 2018, the TSE announced a somewhat strange and unexpected treatment of the TSE-calculated indices for two companies where shares were issued to shareholders of a foreign company where the Japanese company had acquired the foreign company through a Scheme of Arrangement under foreign jurisdiction.
The announcements for TOPIX and JPX Nikkei 400 were made then, and despite the events being entirely similar in construct, but different in month of Scheme Effective Date, they were put in the same month for Mitula and the first tranche of the Takeda inclusion, which was split between two months because of its large impact.
The large IPO last month of Softbank Corp (9434 JP) means there is another large inclusion going effective as of the open of trading on 31 January.
Wednesday is going to be a big day.
If everyone trades their required index amount on the day, it should be a trillion yen plus of flows.
In this report, we provide an analysis of our pair trade idea between SK Telecom (017670 KS) and SK Hynix Inc (000660 KS). Our strategy will be to long SK Telecom (017670 KS) and short SK Hynix Inc (000660 KS). Our base case strategy is to achieve gains of 8-10% on this pair trade. Our risk control is to close the trade if it generates 4-5% in combined losses. Cost of commissions are not included in the calculations and closing prices as of January 25th are used in our pair trade. [Long SK Telecom – $0.5 million; Short SK Hynix – $0.5 million for total of $1.0 million].
The following are the major catalysts that could boost SK Telecom shares higher than SK Hynix shares within the next six to twelve months:
Finally, a Higher DPS for SK Telecom is Likely, but Market Has Not Fully Factored In
SK Hynix’s Plan for a 40% Lower Capex in 2019 Implies an Excess Inventory Condition
5G Service Ready to Start in March; Higher ARPU Typically Results in Higher Share Price
SK Telecom’s Establishment of an Intermediate Holding Company Will Take Place in 2019
Grab is not just challenging the usual passengers-ride and taxi market; it has upped its game by selling monthly subscription plans, which can build recurring users. It is also looking to take bigger slices of business trips, traditionally the more lucrative pie for local taxi companies and niche car rental companies.
This report explains why Grab has gone into this promotional strategy, and is divided into five parts:
Over the past three years, an aggressive price war has pushed Indonesian data prices down 80% to unsustainable levels. With the exception of India, and Jio’s moves there, Indonesia now has the cheapest data in markets we track globally. However, there have been signs recently of tariff stability, with Telkomsel’s tariff rising 7%. Investors’ main concern, and the key risk to being bullish on the sector in Indonesia, is the risk a price war breaks out again. We think that is unlikely. The smaller telcos are not making sufficient returns to cover capex and finance costs and market share gains alone will not save them. Something needs to give: either prices rise and/or smaller players consolidate. Rumors swirling around Indosat (ISAT IJ) in recent days suggest consolidation may be under consideration again.
Our view is that the price cycle has turned in Indonesia and consolidation is likely. That underpins our positive view on Indonesian telcos. We look for Telkom Indonesia (TLKM IJ) to deliver strong growth from its two major engines: mobile through Telkomsel and fixed line (broadband). The stock has done reasonably well since mid-2018, but we see upside and rate the shares a Buy with a raised target price of IDR5,250. We continue to like the re-rating story at XL Axiata (EXCL IJ), and remain Buyers with a price target of IDR5,200. Indosat’s share price has soared in recent days and we have now cut the stock to a Sell with the target price retained at IDR2,040.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
After 6.5bn+ shares came off lockup last week (by Travis Lundy’s estimate), Xiaomi made a placement equal to about 1% of shares outstanding at a sharp discount to the close. This follows a block of 120mm shares last Thursday at HK$8.80 (at a 13+% discount); Apoletto reported a distribution (sale) of 594+mm shares on January 9th to reduce their total position across all funds from 9.25% to 4.99%; and there was a block placement launched earlier in the week for 231mm shares for sale between HK$9.28 and HK$9.60.
While as much as 1bn shares may have already transacted (assuming most of the 594mm shares distributed by Apoletto have been sold in the market), there were ~6.5 billion shares which could be sold and an additional 1bn+ of additional conversions designed to be sold.
In another 6 months, there will be another 4bn+ shares which come off LockUp. In total, that is up to 10-11bn shares coming off lockup between a week ago and 6 months from now. That is four times the total IPO size, and 70-80% of the total position coming off lock-up has an average in-price of HK$2.00 or less. Apoletto’s average in-price was HK$9.72.
Travis is also skeptical that the company’s capital deserves a premium to peers, and is not entirely convinced that the pre-IPO profit forecasts are going to be met in the medium-term. In the meantime, a lot of the current capital structure base is looking to get out.
Nota Bene: Bloomberg’s 3bn-shares-to-come-off-lockup number was confirmed by Travis (the day he published the piece linked below) with the people who tallied the info for the CACS function. They had neglected to count a certain group of shareholders. The actual number will be well north of 6 billion shares.
After the close of trading on the 15 January, NTT announced it had repurchased 3.395mm shares for ¥15.349bn in the first 7 trading days of the month, purchasing 10.9% of the volume traded. This announcement was bang in line with Travis’ insight the prior day, where he anticipated the buybacks would soon be done.
The push to buy shares on-market at NTT vs off-market at NTT Docomo has had some effect but not a huge effect. The NTT/Docomo price ratio is a bit more than 5% off its late October 2018 lows prior to the “Docomo Shock”, but the ratio is off highs. Off the lows, the Stub Trade has done really well.
NTT DoCoMo bought back ¥600bn of shares from NTT at the end of 2018. That means NTT DoCoMo could buy back perhaps ¥300-400bn of shares from the market over the next year or so before ‘feeling the need’ to buy back shares from NTT again. NTT will likely buy back at least ¥160bn of NTT shares from the government in FY19 starting April 1st, which means there will be room to buy back another ¥100bn from the government before not having any more room to do so.
There could be an NTT buyback from the market in FY2019, and one should expect that for the company to buy back shares from the government again, if NTT follows the pattern shown to date, there should be another ¥400-500bn of buybacks from the market over the next two years, and if EPS threatens a further fall on NTT DoCoMo earnings weakness, NTT might boost the buyback to make up for that.
The very large sale by NTT of NTT Docomo shares this past December will free up a significant amount of Distributable Capital Surplus.
On a three-year basis, Travis would rather own NTT than NTT Docomo. But he expects the drift on the ratio will not be overwhelming unless NTT does “something significant”.
Singaporean real-estate group Capitaland has entered into a SPA to buy Ascendas-Singbridge (ASB) from its controlling shareholder, Temasek. The proposed acquisition values ASB at an enterprise value of S$10.9bn and equity value of S$6.0bn. Capitaland will fund the acquisition through 50% cash and 50% in shares (862.3mn shares @$3.25/share – ~17% dilution). Capitaland-ASB will have a pro-forma AUM of S$116bn, making it the largest real estate investment manager in Asia and the ninth largest global real estate manager.
Hitachi Ltd (6501 JP)announced it had received approvals from the relevant government authorities, and its Tender Offer for Yungtay (at TWD 60/share) has now launched. The Tender Offer will go through March 7th 2019 with the target of reaching 100% ownership. Son of the founder, former CEO, and Honorary Chairman Hsu Tso-Li (Chou-Li) of Yungtay has agreed to tender his 4.27% holding. The main difference between the offer details as discussed in Going Up! Hitachi Tender for Yungtay Engineering (1507 TT) back in October, is a minimum threshold for success of reaching just over one-third of the shares outstanding, with a minimum to buy of 88,504,328 shares (21.66%, including the 4.27% to be tendered by Hsu Tso-Li).
This deal looks pretty straightforward, but the stock has been trading reasonably tight to terms, with annualized spreads on a reasonable expectation of closing date in the 3.5-4.5% annualized range for a decent part of December, rising into early January before seeing a jump in price and drop in annualized on the second trading day of the year. This shows some expectation of a fight and a bump.
To avoid that fight and bump – the Baojia Group, which supported Hsu Tso-Ming’s board revolt last summer (discussed in the previous insight), has reportedly accumulated a 10% stake – Hitachi has lowered its minimum threshold to complete the deal to get to one-third plus a share. Given that it controls 11.7% itself as the largest shareholder, and has another 4.3% from the chairman in the bag, that means it needs about 17.3% of the remaining 84% to be successful.
Because the minimum is only about 21% of the float, this deal has quite decent odds of getting up unless someone makes a more serious run for it. As an arb, Travis sees a small chance of a bump because of some potential harassment value by Hsu Tso-Ming’s friends at Baojia Group. Hitachi has already taken that into account with the lowering of the minimum, but it is possible that enough noise can be created to obtain a bump.
Courts, a leading electrical, consumer electronics and furniture retailer predominantly in Singapore and Malaysia, has announced a voluntary conditional offer from Japanese big box electronics retailer Nojima Corp (7419 JP) at $0.205/share, a 34.9% premium to the last closing price. The key condition to the Offer is the valid acceptances of 50% of shares out. Singapore Retail Group, with 73.8%, has given an irrevocable to tender. Once tendered, this offer will become unconditional. The question is whether minorities should hold on.
Barings/Topaz-controlled Singapore Retail Group are exiting, having not altered their shareholding since CAL’s 2012 listing. If Nojima receives acceptances from 90% of shareholders, it will move to compulsory delisting of the shares. If the Offer closes with Nojima holding >75% of shares, it could still launch an exit/delisting offer pursuant to Rule 1307 and Rule 1308.
Long-suffering shareholders may wish to hold on for a potential turnaround should Nojima extract expected synergies. But this looks like a decent opportunity (of sorts) to also exit along with the controlling shareholder.
The board of Navitas, a global education provider, has unanimously backed a revised bid by 18.4% shareholder BGH Consortium of A$5.825/share, 6% higher than its previous rejected offer and a 34% premium to undisturbed price.
The revised proposal drops the “lock out” conditions attached to BGH Consortium’s previous offer, enabling BGH to support a superior proposal. BGH has also been granted an exclusivity period until the 18 Feb.
Panalpina Welttransport announced that it had received an unsolicited, non-binding proposal from DSV A/S (DSV DC) to acquire the company at a price of CHF 170 per share, consisting of 1.58 DSV shares and CHF 55 in cash for each Panalpina share. The offer comes at a premium of 24% to Panalpina’s closing share price of CHF 137.5 as of 11 January 2019 and 31% to the 60-day VWAP of CHF 129.5 as of 11 January 2019. Following the announcement, Panalpina’s shares surged above the terms of the offer implying that the market was anticipating a higher bid from DSV or one of its competitors.
Investors lashed out at Panalpina’s board last year (after years of griping by some of the top holders), eventually forcing the main shareholder to support the installation of a new chairman of the board.
The stock is clearly in play. And the sector is seeing ongoing consolidation. DSV’s approach to Panalpina comes just months after it failed in an attempt to buy Switzerland’sCeva Logistics AG (CEVA SW). Media reports suggested Switzerland’s Kuehne & Nagel are also rumoured to be considering an offer for Panalpina.
Panalpina’s largest shareholder, Ernst Goehner Foundation, owns a stake of approximately 46%. If EGS wants to see OPMs up at global standards level – in the area of DSV and KNIN – then they may need to see someone else manage the assets. If EGS is steadfastly against Panalpina losing its independence, a deal will not get done. That said, if a deal does not get done because the board reflects the interest of EGS, that proves the board is not as independent as previously claimed. But one must imagine there is a right price for everything.
Earlier this month, Bristol Myers Squibb Co (BMY US)and Celgene announced a definitive agreement for BMY to acquire Celgene in a $74bn cash and stock deal. The headline price of $102.43 per Celgene share plus one CVR (contingent value right) is a 53.7% premium to CELG’s closing price of $66.64 on January 2, 2019, before assigning any value to the CVR. The CVR has a binary outcome: it will either be worth zero or will be worth a $9 cash payment upon the FDA approval of three drugs.
While there don’t appear to be any major problems in commercial products, it remains to be seen whether the antitrust authorities go further into the pipeline to determine whether potential competition from drugs still in clinical trials could present issues in the future.
Overall, the merger agreement appears fairly standard, but it does (also) require BMY shareholder approval which typically overlays a higher risk premium. For John DeMasi, the attraction for this arb is the current risk/reward.
ANTYA Investments Inc. chimes in on the deal and considers it unlikely that a suitor for CELG emerges at a higher price, whereas rumours of suitors for BMY abound, and would therefore make a long bet on BMY.
On the 10 January, PAH announced CKI had entered into a placing agreement to sell 43.8mn shares (2.05% of shares out) at HK$52.93/share (a 4.7% discount to last close), reducing CKI’s holding in PAH to 35.96%. This is CKI’s first stake sale in PAH since the 2015 restructuring of the Li Ka Shing group of companies, and it has been over three years since the CKI/PAH scheme merger was blocked by minority shareholders. It is also around two months since FIRB blocked CKI/PAH/CKA/CKHH in its scheme offer for APA Group (APA AU).
I don’t see a sale of PAH as being a realistic outcome – this is more likely an opportunity to take some money (the placement is just US$328mn) off the table. CKI remains intertwined with PAH via their utility JVs in Australia, Europe and UK, and in most investments, together they have absolute control.
I would also not discount a merger re-load. The pushback in 2015 was that the (revised) merger ratio of 1.066x (PAH/CKI) was too low and took advantage of CKI’s outperformance prior to the announcement. That ratio is now around 0.9x. A relaunched deal at ~1x would probably get up – the average since the deal-break is 1.02x and the 12-month average is 0.95x. And a merger ratio at these levels would ensure Ck Hutchison Holdings (1 HK)‘s holding into the merged entity would be <50%, so it would not be required to consolidate. This recent sell-down does not, however, elevate the near-term chances of a renewed merger.
The takeaway is that the stub is very choppy, it often (but not always) widens after the full-year results, and the highest implied stub/EBITDA occurred outside of FY16, its most profitable year. The downward trend since January last year reflects the anticipated ~17% decline in EBITDA for FY18 to ₩148bn, its lowest level in the past four years.
Sanghyun mentioned that there are signs of improving fundamentals for local cosmetics stocks (as reflected in CapIQ) and that Holdcos have traditionally been more susceptible to fundamental changes. This should augur a shift to the upside in the implied stub.
I see the discount to NAV at 27%, right on the 2STD line and compares to a 12-month average of 3%. This looks like an interesting set-up level.
The Offer for Selangor Properties (SPR MK)has been bumped again, to RM6.30 from RM6.00. The original Offer was pitched at RM5.70/share. This latest proposal is a 55% premium to the undisturbed price and 10% above the initial bid. This is starting to look reasonable, at 0.89x P/B. On balance, this will probably now get up. (link to my earlier insight: Selangor Props – Privatisation Offer Does Not Reflect Full Value)
My ongoing series flags large moves (~10%) in CCASS holdings over the past week or so, moves which are often outside normal market transactions. These may be indicative of share pledges. Or potential takeovers. Or simply help understand volume swings.
Often these moves can easily be explained – the placement of new shares, rights issue, movements subsequent to a takeover, amongst others. For those mentioned below, I could not find an obvious reason for the CCASS move.
Leading Indonesian mini-mart operator Sumber Alfaria Trijaya Tbk P (AMRT IJ) (Alfamart) has undergone quite a dramatic transformation over the past 12 months, with a dramatic slowdown in its new store buildout paving the way for a significant pick up in SSSG and a reduction in debt.
The company plans to start to step up its store openings selectively over the next year, with 500 new stores planned and fewer closures. Last year it only opened net 200 new stores having opened 1200 stores the previous year.
The market segment continues to see consolidation, with supermarkets and hypermarts suffering and mini-markets continuing to gain ground as the “pantry of the middle-class”.
The company continues to grow its fee-income business, which is highly profitable, with increasing collaboration with utilities, finance companies, and e-commerce players to name but a few.
After a difficult 2017, Sumber Alfaria Trijaya Tbk P (AMRT IJ) looks to be well and truly back on a growth trajectory, with a rationalisation of its stores, a slow down in its expansion, reduced gearing, and a focus on operational efficiencies. The Mini-market continues to win out in the retail space and is increasingly being used as a distribution network for e-commerce companies. The growth in fee-service from bill payment and other services will be positive for the bottom line. The stock is by no means cheap on a PE basis but provides quite unique exposure to what is still a high-growth area of the economy. According to Capital IQ consensus estimates, the company trades on 51x FY19E PER and 44x FY20E PER, with forecast EPS growth of +30% and +16% for FY19E and FY20E respectively.
Corrigenda: There is an error in this insight. Please note the correction.
Correction: Please ignore the incomplete sentence at the end of the second paragraph in the blue box below (“On the valuation end,…”).
Aequitas Research puts out a weekly update on the deals that have been covered by Smartkarma Insight Providers recently, along with updates for upcoming IPOs.
It has been a fairly busy week. Activity in the ECM space seems to be picking up with block trades taking the lead this week. We had Xiaomi Corp (1810 HK), Ayala Corporation (AC PM), Puregold Price Club (PGOLD PM), and Longfor Properties (960 HK) placements this week and most of them secondary sell-downs except for Puregold which was a top-up placement. Most placements performed well, trading above their IPO price, except for Longfor which only managed to claw back to its deal price on Friday.
Starting with Xiaomi, we think that there would likely be more selling considering that there is a massive overhang after the lock-up expired on 9th of January. Our calculation indicated that major shareholders may have about 6bn shares to be sold. Even if we exclude the founders’ shares, there will still be about 4bn shares left to be sold. The share price has managed to claw back above HK$10 level on Friday and we also heard that the books were several times covered with allocation being concentrated among a handful of investors. The tighter discount of this placement compared to the one earlier that crossed at 14% discount probably indicated demand is relatively better for this placement. On the valuation end, we
Ayala Corp’s placement was upsized and has also done well contrary to our view. We thought that the sell-down may perhaps indicate that there is an overhang from Mitsubishi’s remaining stake. But, we heard that books were well covered.
For IPOs this week, Weimob.com (2013 HK) traded well on the first day but took a spectacular dive on the second day of trading. It was down 30% intraday before bouncing back up and finally closing at IPO price on Friday. On the other hand, Chengdu Expressway Company Limited (1785 HK) hovered around its IPO price with little liquidity.
In terms of upcoming deals, PH Resorts Group (PHR PM) is looking to launch a US$350m share sale in about two months time. Maoyan Entertainment (EPLUS HK) has already launched its IPO on Friday while there will be more IPOs heading to the US. Jubilant Pharma is said to have turned to the US for its US$500m IPO after trying to list in Singapore last year. Home Credit Group and Sinopec’s retail unit might be seeking to this in Hong Kong this year. Luckin Coffee is also said to be seeking an IPO in Hong Kong.
Accuracy Rate:
Our overall accuracy rate is 71.9% for IPOs and 64.1% for Placements
(Performance measurement criteria is explained at the end of the note)
New IPO filings
Shenwan Hongyuang Group (Hong Kong, >US$1bn)
Tai Hing Holdings (Hong Kong, ~US$200m)
Changsha Broad Homes Industrial Group (Hong Kong, >US$100m)
Shanghai Gench Education (Hong Kong, >US$100m)
China Yunfang Holdings (Hong Kong, ~US$100m)
Below is a snippet of our IPO tool showing upcoming events for the next week. The IPO tool is designed to provide readers with timely information on all IPO related events (Book open/closing, listing, initiation, lock-up expiry, etc) for all the deals that we have worked on. You can access the tool here or through the tools menu.
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
From end of 2008 to end of 2017, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) (2330 TT) had a remarkable run with the share price up more than 400%. However, TSMC share price has not fared so well in the past year with its share price down nearly 16% during this period. In this report, we provide a BEAR INVESTMENT CASE for TSMC. We do not believe all its troubles are over. Rather, we expect its sales and earnings to be much lower than the consensus in 2020. The following are the seven major reasons that are likely to negatively impact TSMC’s share price and its financials in the next two years:
The major tipping point period of higher demand for autonomous vehicles (which is likely to drive higher incremental demand for semiconductor products) is not likely until 2023. [Timing of incremental customers demand]
The major tipping point period of higher demand for 5G service (which is likely to drive higher incremental demand for semiconductor products) is not likely until 2021/2022. [Timing of incremental customers demand]
Increasing threats to Apple. [Threats to a major customer]
Major semiconductor memory prices such as DRAM and NANDFlash have been declining in the past few weeks. This could foreshadow a further softening of demand and prices in the entire semiconductor sector, including the foundry. The semiconductor companies increased their capex excessively in 2017 and this is likely to result in further reduced prices in 2019. [Concerns about oversupply/capex]
Collapsing demand for cryptocurrency mining machines. [Concerns about a customer segment]
Taiwan Semiconductor Mfg Co has dominated the foundry segment over the past two decades. With revenues of $33 billion in 2017, the company had a 56% share of the foundry market and was over five times the size of its nearest competitor, Globalfoundries. Under the visionary leadership of Morris Chang, TSMC effectively invented the fabless model. Originally mocked by former AMD CEO Gerry Sanders who once famously quipped that “real men own fabs”, the fabless model has evolved into a thriving ecosystem, one which has facilitated the meteoric rise of some of the biggest names in the semiconductor segment including Apple, Qualcomm and Nvidia.
TSMC’s success has been predicated upon the company’s so-called Trinity of Strengths, namely process leadership, manufacturing excellence and customer trust. In today’s highly competitive foundry landscape, those strengths have never been more significant.
While the smartphone processor business has been central to TSMC’s growth in recent years with Apple accounting for some 22% of revenues, the company is well positioned to diversify and benefit from high, secular growth trends in IoT, Automotive and AI acceleration. Even more significantly, TSMC is set to compete for the first time with Intel in the lucrative data center market by virtue of its role in manufacturing server chips for Advanced Micro Devices and a growing swathe of ARM-based server initiatives lead by none other than Amazon.
Between 2006 and 2017, TSMC grew at a CAGR of 9.8% in NT$ terms, easily outpacing growth of both the broader semiconductor segment and its foundry peers. For the period 2019-2022, we model TSMC growing at a slightly lower CAGR of 8.36%, but nonetheless more than double the anticipated CAGR for the semiconductor segment as a whole.
M1 Ltd (M1 SP), the third largest telecom operator in Singapore, is subject to a voluntary conditional offer (VGO) at S$2.06 cash per share from Keppel Corp Ltd (KEP SP) and Singapore Press Holdings (SPH SP) (KCL-SPH). KCL-SPH said on Tuesday that they wouldn’t increase their S$2.06 offer price “under any circumstances whatsoever.”
KCL-SPH’s stance not to increase their S$2.06 offer price is a clever ploy to the put the ball in Axiata Group (AXIATA MK)’s court. Axiata has three options, in our view. We believe that the probability of a material bid to KCL-SPH’s offer is low with Axiata most likely to retain its stake as a minority shareholder.
Maoyan Entertainment (formerly Entertainment Plus) launched its institutional book building last Friday. We covered the company’s background, industry backdrop, financials, shareholders and the regulatory overhang in our previous two notes.
In this note, we will look at the recent development of the company, based on the data from the prospectus and our channel checks. We will also discuss the valuation of the company.
SamE Common/1P are now below -2σ on a 20D MA. This is almost 120D low. 1P discount to Common is 16.61%. This is the lowest since mid November last year. Div yield difference is also on the decline. It is now 0.7%p on FY19 local street consensus.
It is possible to see short-term price correction on both after the recent mini rally. This’d complicate predictability on price pairing. But we are moving into March OGM cycle. This should put harsher pressure on 1P.
I’d close the previous position. I’d initiate another round of pair trade. This time go long Common and short 1P with a short term horizon.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
In our Discover HK Connect series, we aim to help our investors understand the flow of southbound trades via the Hong Kong Connect, as analyzed by our proprietary data engine. We will discuss the stocks that experienced the most inflow and outflow by mainland investors in the past seven days.
We split the stocks eligible for the Hong Kong Connect trade into three groups: component stocks in the HSCEI index, stocks with a market capitalization between USD 1 billion and USD 5 billion, and stocks with a market capitalization between USD 500 million and USD 1 billion.
In this week’s HK Connect Discovery, we highlight that Tencent topped the weekly inflow by quantum and its shares held by mainland investors via Stock Connect is at one year low. Stocks exposed to mobile game sector experienced inflow too. In addition, we continue to observe that the mainland investors holding on Yichang HEC continue to rise.
TSMC has struggled after breaking trend support last summer and from pressure stemming from the double top.
Underlying support is starting to take shape as the weekly cycle wrestles with a cycle trough amid a constructive descending wedge forming in the daily cycle. There are still a number of overhead hurdles to clear for a sustainable up cycle to resume. Current support is critical to hold as we hover just above this inflection point. A break below outlined support would take TSMC into a lower trading range.
Tracking Traffic/Chinese Express & Logistics is the hub for our research on China’s express parcels and logistics sectors. Tracking Traffic/Chinese Express & Logistics features analysis of monthly Chinese express and logistics data, notes from our conversations with industry players, and links to company and thematic notes.
This month’s issue covers the following topics:
December express parcel pricing fell by over 9% Y/Y. Average pricing per express parcel fell by 9.1% Y/Y, the worst decline since Q216 (excluding January/February figures distorted by the Lunar New Year holiday).
Express parcel revenue growth remained well below 20% last month. Weak pricing dragged sector revenue growth down to 17% in December, the 4th consecutive month of sub-20% growth.
Intra-city pricing (ie, local delivery) was strong in 2018. Relative to weak inter-city pricing (down 3.1% Y/Y in 2018), pricing for intra-city express shipments was firm, rising by 0.1% last year. In fact, average pricing for intra-city express shipments has risen in four of the last five years.
Underlying domestic transport demand remained firm in December. Although demand for inter-city express shipments appears to be moderating (from high levels), underlying transportation activity in December remained firm. The three modes of freight transport we track (rail, highway, air) in aggregate rose 6.6% Y/Y in December, even as the growth of air freight slowed.
We retain a negative view of China’s express industry’s fundamentals: demand growth is slowing and pricing for inter-city shipments appears to be falling faster than costs can be cut, leading to margin compression.
The recent collapse of Xiaomi Corp (1810 HK)’s shares after the end of its six-month lock-up period has focused minds on upcoming lockup expirations. Pinduoduo (PDD US) is the next major Chinese tech company with an upcoming lock-up expiration – its six-month lock-up period expires on 22 January.
We have been bulls on Pinduoduo with the shares up 32% since its IPO. While we are not privy to the shareholding plans of Pinduoduo’s shareholders, we believe that Pinduoduo will likely not mirror Xiaomi’s share price collapse after the end of its six-month lock-up period.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
My colleagues strive to cover M&A transactions in Asia-Pac – and further afield – with a market cap >US$100mn and/or when liquidity or the backdrop story warrant comment. This insight is no exception.
In the past two weeks, two companies who form part of the Huarong-CMB network (HCN), as discussed by David Webb, and one company enmeshed in the Enigma network, have received official offers or are have made announcements pursuant to the Hong Kong Code on Takeovers and Mergers.
Below are brief comments on all three situations. In the case of New Sports, it is a very real deal, with financing in place for the cash option.
It is arguable whether the tanking in CSST shares yesterday after the resumption of trading, increases or lessens the chances of an official Offer unfolding.
Maoyan Entertainment (EPLUS HK) is the largest online movie ticketing service provider in China. The mid-point of Maoyan’s IPO price range of HK$14.8-20.4 per share implies a market value of $2.5 billion (HK$19.8 billion). Five cornerstone investors have agreed to buy $30 million or 10% of the offering at the IPO mid-point. The cornerstone investors are Imax China Holding (1970 HK), Hylink Digital Solutions, Prestige of The Sun, Welight Capital and Xiaomi Corp (1810 HK).
Our analysis suggests Maoyan is being offered at a material premium to a peer group of major Chinese internet companies. Due to challenging prospects faced by Maoyan as outlined in our previous research, we believe a premium rating is unwarranted. Consequently, we are inclined to sit out this IPO.
HET has grown its revenue at an impressive 73% CAGR from 2015 to 2017 and has been accompanied by gross margin expansion. The strong growth was supported by improving operating metrics such as an increase in student enrollment and average spending.
However, HET has been making losses and continues to spend more than its net billing. It is unclear whether HET had already achieved break even for its proprietary courses before expanding into its CCtalk platform. But from its high level of expenses, it seems unsustainable for HET to be relying heavily on the sales and marketing spending to get users to purchase online courses.
In this insight, we will look into the company’s financial and operating performance, regulatory risks regarding K12 courses, aggressive spending on sales and marketing, and the performance of other online education companies.
From end of 2008 to end of 2017, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) (2330 TT) had a remarkable run with the share price up more than 400%. However, TSMC share price has not fared so well in the past year with its share price down nearly 16% during this period. In this report, we provide a BEAR INVESTMENT CASE for TSMC. We do not believe all its troubles are over. Rather, we expect its sales and earnings to be much lower than the consensus in 2020. The following are the seven major reasons that are likely to negatively impact TSMC’s share price and its financials in the next two years:
The major tipping point period of higher demand for autonomous vehicles (which is likely to drive higher incremental demand for semiconductor products) is not likely until 2023. [Timing of incremental customers demand]
The major tipping point period of higher demand for 5G service (which is likely to drive higher incremental demand for semiconductor products) is not likely until 2021/2022. [Timing of incremental customers demand]
Increasing threats to Apple. [Threats to a major customer]
Major semiconductor memory prices such as DRAM and NANDFlash have been declining in the past few weeks. This could foreshadow a further softening of demand and prices in the entire semiconductor sector, including the foundry. The semiconductor companies increased their capex excessively in 2017 and this is likely to result in further reduced prices in 2019. [Concerns about oversupply/capex]
Collapsing demand for cryptocurrency mining machines. [Concerns about a customer segment]
Taiwan Semiconductor Mfg Co has dominated the foundry segment over the past two decades. With revenues of $33 billion in 2017, the company had a 56% share of the foundry market and was over five times the size of its nearest competitor, Globalfoundries. Under the visionary leadership of Morris Chang, TSMC effectively invented the fabless model. Originally mocked by former AMD CEO Gerry Sanders who once famously quipped that “real men own fabs”, the fabless model has evolved into a thriving ecosystem, one which has facilitated the meteoric rise of some of the biggest names in the semiconductor segment including Apple, Qualcomm and Nvidia.
TSMC’s success has been predicated upon the company’s so-called Trinity of Strengths, namely process leadership, manufacturing excellence and customer trust. In today’s highly competitive foundry landscape, those strengths have never been more significant.
While the smartphone processor business has been central to TSMC’s growth in recent years with Apple accounting for some 22% of revenues, the company is well positioned to diversify and benefit from high, secular growth trends in IoT, Automotive and AI acceleration. Even more significantly, TSMC is set to compete for the first time with Intel in the lucrative data center market by virtue of its role in manufacturing server chips for Advanced Micro Devices and a growing swathe of ARM-based server initiatives lead by none other than Amazon.
Between 2006 and 2017, TSMC grew at a CAGR of 9.8% in NT$ terms, easily outpacing growth of both the broader semiconductor segment and its foundry peers. For the period 2019-2022, we model TSMC growing at a slightly lower CAGR of 8.36%, but nonetheless more than double the anticipated CAGR for the semiconductor segment as a whole.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
Our proprietary corporate governance scoring system now covers over 1,985 stocks including over 200 in Korea.
We recently added a coverage of 28 new names in Korea.
The two lowest scores in this group are Samsung Electro-Mechanics and Advanced Process Systems both with scores of 40/100.
The involvement of a former executive at Samsung Electro-Mechanics in the Park scandal and ouster highlights the governance risk.
Companies with good governance include LS Corp, and Lotte Shopping. Past issues with the founding family of Lotte should be noted and taken into consideration. We welcome requests from clients of names they want to see added to the universe.
While Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company‘s Q4 2018 earnings were in line with expectations at ~$9.4 billion, the company’s revenue forecast for Q1 2019 was down 22% sequentially to $7.3 billion. TSMC predicts a tepid 2019 with semiconductor growth of 1%, down from ~6% last year. Like many of its peers, TSMC sees challenges relating to inventory overhang, waning smartphone unit sales and global macro uncertainty weighing on the company in the first half and expects business to recover to modest growth in the second half. The bottom line is that the company anticipates a no-to-low growth year of the Pig.
In spite of the downbeat outlook for the year, the company reiterated its belief that it will hit its 5-10% growth CAGR through 2021. To meet that goal, it is clear that TSMC now expects both 2020 and 2021 to be double digit growth years and, as we outlined in our SmartKarma Originals report A Bull Investment Case for TSMC (In-Depth Version), much of that growth will come from TSMC’s new-found markets for processors and AI acceleration in the data center.
From a process technology leadership perspective, a fundamental tenet of our bull case for the company, TSMC noted that its 7nm process accounted for a staggering 23% of revenues in the fourth quarter, 7nm+ (with EUV) is on track for volume ramp in the second quarter and 5nm remains on track to follow just one year later.
Investors shrugged of the negative outlook for the year with the company’s share price barely registering the news. We reiterate our bullish stance on the stock and our growth CAGR of 8.36% through 2022.
Kabu.com shares were bid limit up all day long and closed at ¥462, which is a 10+ year closing high.
The idea is not a new one. The mobile telecommunications market in Japan is mature, and one of the few ways Type 1 telecom providers can grow is by adding content through the “pipes.”
KDDI already has an investment in an online banking 50/50 joint venture with MUFG called Jibun Bank (“My Bank” or “Myself Bank”) which it launched in 2008. KDDI established a smartphone-based asset management service with Daiwa Securities Group (8601 JP) just under a year ago, where KDDI owns 66.6% and Daiwa 33.4%. This was to attract younger customers to savings products accessible through an app in order to make those customers stickier over the long-term. KDDI also bought into Lifenet Insurance Co (7157 JP) in 2015 through a capital raise, and is now its largest shareholder at just over 25% (a decent (and recent) presentation of the company is here). About six months ago, KDDI injected ¥6bn (link is Japanese) into Japanese financial services company Finatext to help spark their new service of a ¥0 commission brokerage. I would note that Finatext and partner (now sub) NOWCAST launched an algorithmic personal asset management advisory service using for kabu.com Securities in 2016.
Owning a stake in a broker would go a long ways towards providing comprehensive financial services access by smartphone under a KDDI-owned profit umbrella.
Is a deal like this feasible? Reasonable? Likely?
The two companies’ first response was pretty standard. This was the version from KDDI:
KDDI is considering various possibilities in financial business with kabu.com Securities, however, there is no determined facts. [a better translation of the Japanese is “however… no decisions have been made”]
This is pretty standard in Japanese corporate “clarifications.” There are, in fact, no ‘decisions’ unless a board meeting has been convened and put their stamp on it.
But the Japanese market will look at a comment like this and figure that where there is smoke there is fire.
Preceding my comments on Intouch and Yoosung T&S (024800 KS) are the weekly setup/unwind tables for Asia-Pacific Holdcos.
These relationships trade with a minimum liquidity threshold of US$1mn on a 90-day moving average, and a % market capitalisation threshold – the $ value of the holding/opco held, over the parent’s market capitalisation, expressed as a % – of at least 20%.
Total Access Communication (DTAC TB) recently settled a number of outstanding cases with CAT, one of the two Thai Telecom authorities (the other being TOT). DTAC agreed to pay THB9.5bn ($300m) to CAT to settle a number of outstanding disputes. They did NOT clear all their disputes and there are substantial remaining potential liabilities. In the past, The Thai telcos have tended to ignore these cases given the glacial moves through the system (some are 20+ years), but DTAC’s moves suggest it is time to take a closer look. The total numbers for the industry are substantial at around $20bn and, following DTAC’s settlement, Chris Hoare thinks the risk of crystallizing losses has increased. We have cut our target prices as a result. The industry was already facing headwinds from the business revival at DTAC now that it has secured access to spectrum.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
