Korea’s local news house Hankyung reported the names that should be included in the short list. They are Kakao, MBK Partners (with NetMarble), Tencent, Bain Capital and another foreign PE whose name isn’t disclosed. Apparently, Amazon, Comcast and EA, didn’t make the short list. Those in the short list now get a chance to do due diligence. They will then participate in the main bidding round that is scheduled for early April.
It is being reported that only Kakao and NetMarble (with MBK Partners) are truly interested in taking over Nexon’s management right. Tencent is expected to join either Kakao or NetMarble-led consortium in the end. Bain is looking into possible investment opportunities that may be created if this sale leads to a mandatory tender offer to Nexon minority shareholders. It seems safe to say that this comes down to a two-horse race: either Kakao or NetMarble.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
Both the cap- and equal-weighted S&P 500 are trading at highs not seen since early October 2018 – a positive indication in itself. Additionally, key risk-on areas we highlighted in last week’s Compass (small-caps, Financials/Banks, and Transports) have outperformed off the recent lows – a welcomed sight for risk sentiment, and confirms out positive outlook. In today’s report we highlight attractive bottom-fishing opportunities within the Financials Sector, and attractive Groups and stocks within Large- and Small-Cap Railroads, and Internet Software
BabyTree (1761.HK)’s reported results for FY2018 continues to be impacted by the ‘shift in e-commerce strategy’ post collaboration with Alibaba Group Holding (BABA US) (also a key investor). China’s leading parenting community platform that went public in November 2018 has announced a revenue decline of 4% during 2H2018; its e-commerce revenues were down 70% as its being ‘integrated’ with Alibaba. This is expected to be completed by 2Q2019. While the details of the collaboration (and revenue share, if any) are not given, Management has stated that Alibaba will manage the back-end e-commerce at a reduced cost and better efficiency while it will ‘manage’ users. Despite the fall in revenues, gross profits were up 18% helped by growth in advertisement revenues which now account for 85% of the total. Advertising as a revenue source has limited long term growth and valuation potential compared to e-commerce. The stock is up 25% since results announcement on March 27th, likely enthused by Net profit for FY2018 at Rmb526.2 mn and EPS of Rmb0.29 (implied current Year P/E of 23x). Key risk will be failure to revive e-commerce revenues post ‘integration’.
BabyTree also announced its first global foray – it has invested USD8mn in Healofy, amongst the top 3 leading parenting apps in India currently. India’s online Parenting app segment has numerous players and revenue generation/growth may not be easy in the near term for Healofy. However, our analysis suggests that India’s overcrowded parenting app segment is now witnessing consolidation and this funding could probably help Healofy solidify its ranking amongst top 3 parenting platforms in India. In this context, BabyTree’s foray into India seems well timed. Healofy could potentially follow BabyTree’s operating model and fit into Alibaba Group Holding (BABA US) ‘s India e-commerce strategy (Refer our earlier report Alibaba’s India Game Plan – More than Meets the Eye; Investor Day Analysis (Part II) ).
In the detailed report that follows, we briefly comment on BabyTree’s reported 2018 results and also present a quick overview of India Parenting App segment – key players, investors and why we think it may be on a consolidation mode.
It was reported over the weekend that the troubled display supplier to iPhone maker Apple, Japan Display (JDI) has almost finalized a deal to raise more than JPY110bn (US$990m) from a China-Taiwan consortium and Japanese public-private fund INCJ Ltd.
The China-Taiwan consortium is expected to secure some 50% stake in Japan Display while the top shareholder INCJ’s current stake of 25.3% is expected to be halved.
The consortium is aiming to restructure JDI’s remaining debt payments of about JPY100bn from Apple for the construction of its plant while it also aims to procure parts for the latest iPhone. In addition, the consortium is also trying to modify a contract stipulating that Apple can seize plants if JDI’s cash and deposits fall below a certain amount.
The consortium along with JDI is planning to build an OLED panel plant in China with JDI providing the technological know-how while the consortium partners invest in capital expenditures and equity.
Japan Display has been struggling to navigate its display business due to the slowdown in iPhone sales, falling behind competition on OLED technology and facing stiff price competition from Chinese panel makers.
We expect the proposed OLED plant in China could help the company stabilize its panel business with Chinese smartphone makers Huawei and Xiaomi who prefer to source panels locally from domestic panel makers such as BOE Technology and Tianma.
On Monday, Bilibili Inc (BILI US) unveiled plans to raise around $192 million (based on the closing price of $18.95 per ADS) through a public offering of 10.6 million ADS and a concurrent offering of $300 million convertible senior notes. Also, certain selling shareholders will offer 6.5 ADS in the offering.
We believe bilibili’s fundamentals are mixed as rapid monthly active users (MAUs) and non-mobile games growth is offset by a declining margin and higher cash burn. Overall, the proposed offering is unnecessary and highly opportunistic, and we would not participate in the offering.
Bilibili announced a USD 300 million share placement and a USD 300 million convertible note placement after market close on Monday. This is the first major placement since Bilibili’s IPO in March 2018. In this insight, we will provide our thoughts on the deal and score the deal in our ECM Framework.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
Korea’s local news house Hankyung reported the names that should be included in the short list. They are Kakao, MBK Partners (with NetMarble), Tencent, Bain Capital and another foreign PE whose name isn’t disclosed. Apparently, Amazon, Comcast and EA, didn’t make the short list. Those in the short list now get a chance to do due diligence. They will then participate in the main bidding round that is scheduled for early April.
It is being reported that only Kakao and NetMarble (with MBK Partners) are truly interested in taking over Nexon’s management right. Tencent is expected to join either Kakao or NetMarble-led consortium in the end. Bain is looking into possible investment opportunities that may be created if this sale leads to a mandatory tender offer to Nexon minority shareholders. It seems safe to say that this comes down to a two-horse race: either Kakao or NetMarble.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
It was reported over the weekend that the troubled display supplier to iPhone maker Apple, Japan Display (JDI) has almost finalized a deal to raise more than JPY110bn (US$990m) from a China-Taiwan consortium and Japanese public-private fund INCJ Ltd.
The China-Taiwan consortium is expected to secure some 50% stake in Japan Display while the top shareholder INCJ’s current stake of 25.3% is expected to be halved.
The consortium is aiming to restructure JDI’s remaining debt payments of about JPY100bn from Apple for the construction of its plant while it also aims to procure parts for the latest iPhone. In addition, the consortium is also trying to modify a contract stipulating that Apple can seize plants if JDI’s cash and deposits fall below a certain amount.
The consortium along with JDI is planning to build an OLED panel plant in China with JDI providing the technological know-how while the consortium partners invest in capital expenditures and equity.
Japan Display has been struggling to navigate its display business due to the slowdown in iPhone sales, falling behind competition on OLED technology and facing stiff price competition from Chinese panel makers.
We expect the proposed OLED plant in China could help the company stabilize its panel business with Chinese smartphone makers Huawei and Xiaomi who prefer to source panels locally from domestic panel makers such as BOE Technology and Tianma.
On Monday, Bilibili Inc (BILI US) unveiled plans to raise around $192 million (based on the closing price of $18.95 per ADS) through a public offering of 10.6 million ADS and a concurrent offering of $300 million convertible senior notes. Also, certain selling shareholders will offer 6.5 ADS in the offering.
We believe bilibili’s fundamentals are mixed as rapid monthly active users (MAUs) and non-mobile games growth is offset by a declining margin and higher cash burn. Overall, the proposed offering is unnecessary and highly opportunistic, and we would not participate in the offering.
Bilibili announced a USD 300 million share placement and a USD 300 million convertible note placement after market close on Monday. This is the first major placement since Bilibili’s IPO in March 2018. In this insight, we will provide our thoughts on the deal and score the deal in our ECM Framework.
While we have been sceptical about Mercari Inc (4385 JP)‘s efforts in the US, we have always appreciated the domestic business and have only been put off by the rather demanding multiples. After speaking to the company, we continue to like the domestic business and feel that recent initiatives to broaden the user base are likely to be successful. In addition, while we still feel that there are numerous question marks about whether the business model can work in the US, we have come around to a more positive view on the company’s execution there. Lastly, we believe Merpay’s edge in the cashless wars is underappreciated and the fall in the share price is starting to make the stock attractive.
In addition, we have provided an updated calendar of upcoming catalysts for EVENT driven names below.
Best of luck for the new week – Arun, Venkat and Rickin
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
Lyft Inc (0812823D US) has kicked off its IPO by posting its S-1 filing last Friday. Rakuten Inc (4755 JP) is Lyft’s single largest shareholder with a 13.05% stake. Rakuten has invested around $700 million to acquire its current Lyft stake and stands to make 3-4 times its investment if Lyft achieves its rumoured IPO valuation range of $20-25 billion.
Lyft’s IPO valuation range was first reported by Reuters on 20 February 2019. On the back of the news, Rakuten’s shares have so far risen around 10%. Notably, at the IPO valuation range, the Lyft stake would account for 20-25% of Rakuten’s current market cap. While the Lyft IPO will prove to be a big winner for Rakuten from an ROI perspective, we believe that from a valuation perspective, the upside is modest.
Lyft Inc (0812823D US) , a leading ride-sharing company, released its IPO prospectus in order to raise 3bn USD. Our key points are below
Intro to Lyft
Lyft – a comparison vs. peers
Strengths and Weaknesses
Financials
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
Lyft Inc (0812823D US) has kicked off its IPO by posting its S-1 filing last Friday. Rakuten Inc (4755 JP) is Lyft’s single largest shareholder with a 13.05% stake. Rakuten has invested around $700 million to acquire its current Lyft stake and stands to make 3-4 times its investment if Lyft achieves its rumoured IPO valuation range of $20-25 billion.
Lyft’s IPO valuation range was first reported by Reuters on 20 February 2019. On the back of the news, Rakuten’s shares have so far risen around 10%. Notably, at the IPO valuation range, the Lyft stake would account for 20-25% of Rakuten’s current market cap. While the Lyft IPO will prove to be a big winner for Rakuten from an ROI perspective, we believe that from a valuation perspective, the upside is modest.
HDC Holdco and its major Sub HDC-OP are now at 247% of σ on a 20D MA for the first time since mid Nov last year. On a 120D, their current price ratio is substantially higher than the mean. Holdco discount is now 40% to NAV. This is nearly a 10%p drop since early Jan.
My previous stub trade on the HDC duo again paid off very nicely. I went long Holdco and short Sub on Jan 11. This trade is now delivering a 15% return. During this period, Holdco climbed 23%. Sub went up 8%. They created a 15%p gap in price performance. Holdco’s 23% running was mainly attributable to re-rating of some of its major unlisted holdings.
Sub also has several key assets that could equally be re-rated. Much of Holdco’s assets that have presumably undergone re-ratings lately are business wise closely correlated with Sub. A 15%p price yield gap should be too harsh on Sub. I expect their price ratio will be challenged downwardly at this level on a short term time horizon.
I’d close my previous position. I’d initiate a new trade. I’d go long Sub and short Holdco. I’d close this trade at < 50% of σ. Given the fluctuation level of this duo, this’d give nearly a 8% yield.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
On Monday, Bilibili Inc (BILI US) unveiled plans to raise around $192 million (based on the closing price of $18.95 per ADS) through a public offering of 10.6 million ADS and a concurrent offering of $300 million convertible senior notes. Also, certain selling shareholders will offer 6.5 ADS in the offering.
We believe bilibili’s fundamentals are mixed as rapid monthly active users (MAUs) and non-mobile games growth is offset by a declining margin and higher cash burn. Overall, the proposed offering is unnecessary and highly opportunistic, and we would not participate in the offering.
Bilibili announced a USD 300 million share placement and a USD 300 million convertible note placement after market close on Monday. This is the first major placement since Bilibili’s IPO in March 2018. In this insight, we will provide our thoughts on the deal and score the deal in our ECM Framework.
While we have been sceptical about Mercari Inc (4385 JP)‘s efforts in the US, we have always appreciated the domestic business and have only been put off by the rather demanding multiples. After speaking to the company, we continue to like the domestic business and feel that recent initiatives to broaden the user base are likely to be successful. In addition, while we still feel that there are numerous question marks about whether the business model can work in the US, we have come around to a more positive view on the company’s execution there. Lastly, we believe Merpay’s edge in the cashless wars is underappreciated and the fall in the share price is starting to make the stock attractive.
On Friday, Qutoutiao Inc (QTT US) unveiled plans to raise around $11 million (based on the closing price of $11.45 per ADS) through a public offering of 1.1 million ADS. Also, certain selling shareholders will offer 7.5 ADS in the offering. The public offering comes hot on the heels of the announcement of a $171.1 million convertible loan from Alibaba Group Holding (BABA US) on 28 March.
We remain cautious on Qutoutiao as it faces an inescapable catch-22 as it cannot attract users without increasing its user acquisition spend and it cannot reach breakeven without lowering its user acquisition costs. Overall, we would not participate in the public offering.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
HDC Holdco and its major Sub HDC-OP are now at 247% of σ on a 20D MA for the first time since mid Nov last year. On a 120D, their current price ratio is substantially higher than the mean. Holdco discount is now 40% to NAV. This is nearly a 10%p drop since early Jan.
My previous stub trade on the HDC duo again paid off very nicely. I went long Holdco and short Sub on Jan 11. This trade is now delivering a 15% return. During this period, Holdco climbed 23%. Sub went up 8%. They created a 15%p gap in price performance. Holdco’s 23% running was mainly attributable to re-rating of some of its major unlisted holdings.
Sub also has several key assets that could equally be re-rated. Much of Holdco’s assets that have presumably undergone re-ratings lately are business wise closely correlated with Sub. A 15%p price yield gap should be too harsh on Sub. I expect their price ratio will be challenged downwardly at this level on a short term time horizon.
I’d close my previous position. I’d initiate a new trade. I’d go long Sub and short Holdco. I’d close this trade at < 50% of σ. Given the fluctuation level of this duo, this’d give nearly a 8% yield.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
Bilibili announced a USD 300 million share placement and a USD 300 million convertible note placement after market close on Monday. This is the first major placement since Bilibili’s IPO in March 2018. In this insight, we will provide our thoughts on the deal and score the deal in our ECM Framework.
While we have been sceptical about Mercari Inc (4385 JP)‘s efforts in the US, we have always appreciated the domestic business and have only been put off by the rather demanding multiples. After speaking to the company, we continue to like the domestic business and feel that recent initiatives to broaden the user base are likely to be successful. In addition, while we still feel that there are numerous question marks about whether the business model can work in the US, we have come around to a more positive view on the company’s execution there. Lastly, we believe Merpay’s edge in the cashless wars is underappreciated and the fall in the share price is starting to make the stock attractive.
On Friday, Qutoutiao Inc (QTT US) unveiled plans to raise around $11 million (based on the closing price of $11.45 per ADS) through a public offering of 1.1 million ADS. Also, certain selling shareholders will offer 7.5 ADS in the offering. The public offering comes hot on the heels of the announcement of a $171.1 million convertible loan from Alibaba Group Holding (BABA US) on 28 March.
We remain cautious on Qutoutiao as it faces an inescapable catch-22 as it cannot attract users without increasing its user acquisition spend and it cannot reach breakeven without lowering its user acquisition costs. Overall, we would not participate in the public offering.
Qutoutiao Inc (QTT US) announced a USD 100 million share sales by the company and its shareholders, slightly more than two weeks after the lock-up expiration on March 13th. In this insight, we will provide our quick thought on the deal.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
HDC Holdco and its major Sub HDC-OP are now at 247% of σ on a 20D MA for the first time since mid Nov last year. On a 120D, their current price ratio is substantially higher than the mean. Holdco discount is now 40% to NAV. This is nearly a 10%p drop since early Jan.
My previous stub trade on the HDC duo again paid off very nicely. I went long Holdco and short Sub on Jan 11. This trade is now delivering a 15% return. During this period, Holdco climbed 23%. Sub went up 8%. They created a 15%p gap in price performance. Holdco’s 23% running was mainly attributable to re-rating of some of its major unlisted holdings.
Sub also has several key assets that could equally be re-rated. Much of Holdco’s assets that have presumably undergone re-ratings lately are business wise closely correlated with Sub. A 15%p price yield gap should be too harsh on Sub. I expect their price ratio will be challenged downwardly at this level on a short term time horizon.
I’d close my previous position. I’d initiate a new trade. I’d go long Sub and short Holdco. I’d close this trade at < 50% of σ. Given the fluctuation level of this duo, this’d give nearly a 8% yield.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
