Following a long period of weakness, robotics related stocks are displaying stronger performance recently as 3Q results have come in weak, but generally done so with management reassurances that this is the bottom.
We had been negative on the sector for some time before turning more constructive in mid January following Yaskawa’s earnings. We concur with the general messaging that this is the bottom based on our analysis of order levels for the companies and regional trend breakdowns. We do not expect a particularly sharp rebound in orders and sales in the near future and believe there is still some risk of these stocks returning toward the lows over the course of the year. However, we believe that the next significant move should be upwards and longer term investors should be looking for entry timings.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
Fanuc Corp (6954 JP) shows increasing signs of a basing process and opportunities on weakness.
Macro retracements display clear synergy with the low at 15,570, suggesting this is a key low.
Use weakness back toward base line support to buy for a medium term rise to press on outlined resistance targets.
Risk lies with the signs of rally fatigue in the near term tactical cycle as the daily RSI fails to confirm recent highs that are knocking on pivotal resistance at 19,000 that acts as the immediate make or break level.
Pivot levels, action points and targets are outlined.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
The assets are a mix of office, retail and logistics and all were completed only in 2018. The cap rates for the acquisition look reasonable versus the existing assets that the REIT owns and the acquisition will likely be DPU accretive despite the relatively larger share of equity financing in the acquisition.
The deal scores well on our framework. However, the stock hasn’t really corrected post the deal announcement and the prior deal provided decent returns only post a correction in the share price.
As we wrote about in Preference for NTT Retained on Its Commitment to a Substantial Long Term Profit Increase, we like the long term story at NTT (Nippon Telegraph & Telephone) (9432 JP) given its relatively low payout ration, long term opportunities for cost reductions as their workforce shrinks through retirements. While government action and the announced price cuts announced by NTT Docomo Inc (9437 JP) hurt sentiment to the sector in 2H18, Chris Hoare remains positive. The recent 3Q results were decent with the key positives being a rising dividend and strong cash flow growth which is in line with our long term positive thesis on the stock. We remain Buyers with a target price of ¥7,150.
Tsubakimoto Chain Co’s (6371 JP) 3QFY03/19 results were strong, with revenue continuing to witness double-digit growth at +13.1% YoY, although fell slightly below consensus estimates. On OP, Tsubakimoto witnessed only +5.2% YoY growth for 3Q. This was, however, above consensus and our estimates.
Nine-months cumulative figures look attractive as well, with both revenue and OP witnessing double-digit growth rates at 13.2% YoY and 16.0% YoY respectively as of The company’s revenue continues to trend upwards in a healthy fashion, while margins managed to reach 10.1% this quarter slightly below the 10.8% OPM achieved in 3Q last year.
A majority of revenue growth came from the company’s Materials Handling Equipment segment, which has witnessed strong recovery thanks to the recently acquired Central Conveyor Company in this segment. The growth was followed by the company’s steadily growing business segments, Chain segment and Power Transmission segment. This was true for the company’s OP as well. The Materials Handling Equipment segment continued to make operating profits this quarter, followed by the Chain segment and the Power Transmission segment. The Auto Parts segment, however, continued to witness slow growth in revenue and pressure in its margins this quarter as well.
Despite strong results, post-release, Tsubakimoto opened -9.9% down on Friday from Thursday’s close. The stock, however, rallied 8% by Tuesday’s close.
NCsoft Corp (036570 KS)‘s 4Q18 earnings fell short of the consensus earnings estimates. In 4Q18, NCsoft reported sales of 399.7 billion won (down 25.1% YoY and 1.1% lower than consensus), operating profit of 112.6 billion won (down 40.5% YoY and 13.3% lower than the consensus), and net profit of 67.6 billion won (down 44% YoY and 32.9% lower than the consensus).
Three different analysts raised questions about why the company changed the timing of the launch of the Lineage2M game. In the 3Q18 earnings conference call, the company previously mentioned that it will most likely launch the Lineage2M mobile MMORPG game in 2Q19. In the most recent 4Q18 earnings conference call, the company mentioned that it will launch Lineage2M by the end of 2019.
We expect little change to the consensus earnings estimates of NCsoft in 2019 and 2020. Although Tencent consortium acquiring Nexon could pose greater competitive threats to NCsoft in Korea, it could also lead to a consolidation of the gaming sector in Asia, which would be a positive for the company. NCsoft is currently trading at P/E multiples of 15x in 2019 and 12x in 2020, based on the consensus earnings estimates, which are attractive. We maintain our positive view of the company following its 4Q18 earnings.
Fashion industry is a leading polluter of water, air and land and its rapid growth has inflicted serious environmental damage in manufacturing bases across Asia. With increased consumer awareness and public scrutiny, leading brands globally have committed to adopt sustainable practices. This can mean a rise in operating costs, margin pressures which can lead to higher prices and/or lower volumes. What does that mean for corporate earnings growth and stock valuations? Our report attempts to arrive at some ballpark estimations based on a scenario analysis. Leading branded apparel companies can suffer market value destruction ranging up to 30% if their long term margins and growth assumptions are reset at lower levels following a shake-up of their existing low cost model. And, those who refuse to adapt and adopt sustainable processes could soon be shunned by ESG-led investors and environmentally mindful consumers alike, leading to valuation discounts. Investors Beware.
Over the past decades, corporate growth and profitability agenda overshadowed environmental considerations, and apparel brands have grown in an environmentally unsustainable manner. Beneath the façade of glitzy fashion magazines lies the dirty underbelly of pesticide use, water mismanagement, irresponsible effluent discharge, chemical poisoning, greenhouse gas emissions, energy overuse, micro-plastic pollution and landfill dumping. Until recently, the notion that apparel retailers should be responsible and accountable for the environmental infringements in their highly fragmented but globalised supply chain was an unwelcome idea. Under pressure from consumers and activists, this is now changing. With ESG-led investing going mainstream, investors too may start to take notice.
The detailed report below includes:
Summary and conclusions from the study on Fast Fashion’s environmental footprint in Asia and impact of rise in consumer awareness on global apparel companies
Understanding Fast fashion
Fast Fashion trends in Asia – Survey findings on consumer attitudes to shopping and environmental issues
Environmental issues in Asia due to Fast fashion
Sustainable clothing – an emerging trend, and what can turn it mainstream
Investing in Fast fashion: between a rock and a hard place – a Valuation vulnerability analysis
Sustainability & 13 leading fast Fashion players – how future ready are they?
This report was prepared jointly by the team at Investory – Devi Subhakesan , Rohinee Sharma and Shilpa Krishnan. Investory commissioned an exclusive survey for this report to understand young urban Asian consumers’ attitude towards fast fashion and their understanding of environmental issues.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
Tsubakimoto Chain Co’s (6371 JP) 3QFY03/19 results were strong, with revenue continuing to witness double-digit growth at +13.1% YoY, although fell slightly below consensus estimates. On OP, Tsubakimoto witnessed only +5.2% YoY growth for 3Q. This was, however, above consensus and our estimates.
Nine-months cumulative figures look attractive as well, with both revenue and OP witnessing double-digit growth rates at 13.2% YoY and 16.0% YoY respectively as of The company’s revenue continues to trend upwards in a healthy fashion, while margins managed to reach 10.1% this quarter slightly below the 10.8% OPM achieved in 3Q last year.
A majority of revenue growth came from the company’s Materials Handling Equipment segment, which has witnessed strong recovery thanks to the recently acquired Central Conveyor Company in this segment. The growth was followed by the company’s steadily growing business segments, Chain segment and Power Transmission segment. This was true for the company’s OP as well. The Materials Handling Equipment segment continued to make operating profits this quarter, followed by the Chain segment and the Power Transmission segment. The Auto Parts segment, however, continued to witness slow growth in revenue and pressure in its margins this quarter as well.
Despite strong results, post-release, Tsubakimoto opened -9.9% down on Friday from Thursday’s close. The stock, however, rallied 8% by Tuesday’s close.
NCsoft Corp (036570 KS)‘s 4Q18 earnings fell short of the consensus earnings estimates. In 4Q18, NCsoft reported sales of 399.7 billion won (down 25.1% YoY and 1.1% lower than consensus), operating profit of 112.6 billion won (down 40.5% YoY and 13.3% lower than the consensus), and net profit of 67.6 billion won (down 44% YoY and 32.9% lower than the consensus).
Three different analysts raised questions about why the company changed the timing of the launch of the Lineage2M game. In the 3Q18 earnings conference call, the company previously mentioned that it will most likely launch the Lineage2M mobile MMORPG game in 2Q19. In the most recent 4Q18 earnings conference call, the company mentioned that it will launch Lineage2M by the end of 2019.
We expect little change to the consensus earnings estimates of NCsoft in 2019 and 2020. Although Tencent consortium acquiring Nexon could pose greater competitive threats to NCsoft in Korea, it could also lead to a consolidation of the gaming sector in Asia, which would be a positive for the company. NCsoft is currently trading at P/E multiples of 15x in 2019 and 12x in 2020, based on the consensus earnings estimates, which are attractive. We maintain our positive view of the company following its 4Q18 earnings.
Fashion industry is a leading polluter of water, air and land and its rapid growth has inflicted serious environmental damage in manufacturing bases across Asia. With increased consumer awareness and public scrutiny, leading brands globally have committed to adopt sustainable practices. This can mean a rise in operating costs, margin pressures which can lead to higher prices and/or lower volumes. What does that mean for corporate earnings growth and stock valuations? Our report attempts to arrive at some ballpark estimations based on a scenario analysis. Leading branded apparel companies can suffer market value destruction ranging up to 30% if their long term margins and growth assumptions are reset at lower levels following a shake-up of their existing low cost model. And, those who refuse to adapt and adopt sustainable processes could soon be shunned by ESG-led investors and environmentally mindful consumers alike, leading to valuation discounts. Investors Beware.
Over the past decades, corporate growth and profitability agenda overshadowed environmental considerations, and apparel brands have grown in an environmentally unsustainable manner. Beneath the façade of glitzy fashion magazines lies the dirty underbelly of pesticide use, water mismanagement, irresponsible effluent discharge, chemical poisoning, greenhouse gas emissions, energy overuse, micro-plastic pollution and landfill dumping. Until recently, the notion that apparel retailers should be responsible and accountable for the environmental infringements in their highly fragmented but globalised supply chain was an unwelcome idea. Under pressure from consumers and activists, this is now changing. With ESG-led investing going mainstream, investors too may start to take notice.
The detailed report below includes:
Summary and conclusions from the study on Fast Fashion’s environmental footprint in Asia and impact of rise in consumer awareness on global apparel companies
Understanding Fast fashion
Fast Fashion trends in Asia – Survey findings on consumer attitudes to shopping and environmental issues
Environmental issues in Asia due to Fast fashion
Sustainable clothing – an emerging trend, and what can turn it mainstream
Investing in Fast fashion: between a rock and a hard place – a Valuation vulnerability analysis
Sustainability & 13 leading fast Fashion players – how future ready are they?
This report was prepared jointly by the team at Investory – Devi Subhakesan , Rohinee Sharma and Shilpa Krishnan. Investory commissioned an exclusive survey for this report to understand young urban Asian consumers’ attitude towards fast fashion and their understanding of environmental issues.
We see oil exploration making a comeback in 2019, as drilling spending sees an increase and on the back of encouraging well results year to date. Already in 2019 there have been 4 high impact discoveries in the UK, South Africa and Guyana. Given the need of companies, especially the majors, to replenish their portfolios, there will still be a number of frontier, high impact wells being drilled. The areas where we see material exploration wells being drilled this year are Guyana, US GoM, Mexico, Brazil the Eastern Mediterranean and West Africa.
If there is some exploration success, the pure-play exploration companies will be good performers, especially those that have exposure to several wells that could be material relative to their size. A pick up in drilling will also be positive for the offshore drilling companies and seismic names. We look at the merits and pitfalls of investing in exploration, performance in 2018, outlook for 2019, the debate over exploring for resource versus buying it, how the economics of exploration have improved and the impact of the time value of money.
Forward earnings will focus heavily on the debut of PS5, the performance of the new Spider-Man movie and other core content revenue streams for the company this year.
Some see Sony as coasting on historically successes of the past, others see recent Disney and ATT deals acquiring content competitors, as a prelude to a play on Sony this year.
Investor pressure to sell or spin off non-content businesses growing due to continued poor performance in mobile and possible profitable departure from semiconductor sector.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
NCsoft Corp (036570 KS)‘s 4Q18 earnings fell short of the consensus earnings estimates. In 4Q18, NCsoft reported sales of 399.7 billion won (down 25.1% YoY and 1.1% lower than consensus), operating profit of 112.6 billion won (down 40.5% YoY and 13.3% lower than the consensus), and net profit of 67.6 billion won (down 44% YoY and 32.9% lower than the consensus).
Three different analysts raised questions about why the company changed the timing of the launch of the Lineage2M game. In the 3Q18 earnings conference call, the company previously mentioned that it will most likely launch the Lineage2M mobile MMORPG game in 2Q19. In the most recent 4Q18 earnings conference call, the company mentioned that it will launch Lineage2M by the end of 2019.
We expect little change to the consensus earnings estimates of NCsoft in 2019 and 2020. Although Tencent consortium acquiring Nexon could pose greater competitive threats to NCsoft in Korea, it could also lead to a consolidation of the gaming sector in Asia, which would be a positive for the company. NCsoft is currently trading at P/E multiples of 15x in 2019 and 12x in 2020, based on the consensus earnings estimates, which are attractive. We maintain our positive view of the company following its 4Q18 earnings.
Fashion industry is a leading polluter of water, air and land and its rapid growth has inflicted serious environmental damage in manufacturing bases across Asia. With increased consumer awareness and public scrutiny, leading brands globally have committed to adopt sustainable practices. This can mean a rise in operating costs, margin pressures which can lead to higher prices and/or lower volumes. What does that mean for corporate earnings growth and stock valuations? Our report attempts to arrive at some ballpark estimations based on a scenario analysis. Leading branded apparel companies can suffer market value destruction ranging up to 30% if their long term margins and growth assumptions are reset at lower levels following a shake-up of their existing low cost model. And, those who refuse to adapt and adopt sustainable processes could soon be shunned by ESG-led investors and environmentally mindful consumers alike, leading to valuation discounts. Investors Beware.
Over the past decades, corporate growth and profitability agenda overshadowed environmental considerations, and apparel brands have grown in an environmentally unsustainable manner. Beneath the façade of glitzy fashion magazines lies the dirty underbelly of pesticide use, water mismanagement, irresponsible effluent discharge, chemical poisoning, greenhouse gas emissions, energy overuse, micro-plastic pollution and landfill dumping. Until recently, the notion that apparel retailers should be responsible and accountable for the environmental infringements in their highly fragmented but globalised supply chain was an unwelcome idea. Under pressure from consumers and activists, this is now changing. With ESG-led investing going mainstream, investors too may start to take notice.
The detailed report below includes:
Summary and conclusions from the study on Fast Fashion’s environmental footprint in Asia and impact of rise in consumer awareness on global apparel companies
Understanding Fast fashion
Fast Fashion trends in Asia – Survey findings on consumer attitudes to shopping and environmental issues
Environmental issues in Asia due to Fast fashion
Sustainable clothing – an emerging trend, and what can turn it mainstream
Investing in Fast fashion: between a rock and a hard place – a Valuation vulnerability analysis
Sustainability & 13 leading fast Fashion players – how future ready are they?
This report was prepared jointly by the team at Investory – Devi Subhakesan , Rohinee Sharma and Shilpa Krishnan. Investory commissioned an exclusive survey for this report to understand young urban Asian consumers’ attitude towards fast fashion and their understanding of environmental issues.
We see oil exploration making a comeback in 2019, as drilling spending sees an increase and on the back of encouraging well results year to date. Already in 2019 there have been 4 high impact discoveries in the UK, South Africa and Guyana. Given the need of companies, especially the majors, to replenish their portfolios, there will still be a number of frontier, high impact wells being drilled. The areas where we see material exploration wells being drilled this year are Guyana, US GoM, Mexico, Brazil the Eastern Mediterranean and West Africa.
If there is some exploration success, the pure-play exploration companies will be good performers, especially those that have exposure to several wells that could be material relative to their size. A pick up in drilling will also be positive for the offshore drilling companies and seismic names. We look at the merits and pitfalls of investing in exploration, performance in 2018, outlook for 2019, the debate over exploring for resource versus buying it, how the economics of exploration have improved and the impact of the time value of money.
Forward earnings will focus heavily on the debut of PS5, the performance of the new Spider-Man movie and other core content revenue streams for the company this year.
Some see Sony as coasting on historically successes of the past, others see recent Disney and ATT deals acquiring content competitors, as a prelude to a play on Sony this year.
Investor pressure to sell or spin off non-content businesses growing due to continued poor performance in mobile and possible profitable departure from semiconductor sector.
Tokyo Kiraboshi Financial Group (7173 JP) (TKFG) progresses from bad to worse, and its stock price is behaving accordingly. Amidst volatile trading, the share price is gradually sinking back towards the 52-week intra-day low of ¥1,454 that was reached on Christmas Day 2018 before closing that day at ¥1,504. 3Q FY3/2019 (9 months to 31 December 2018) consolidated results represented a decline of over 56% YoY at the recurring profit level, with net profits down 34% YoY after tax adjustments. On a quarterly basis, Q3 (October-December 2018) net operating profits collapsed 96% to just ¥66 million, while recurring profits fell 68% YoY to just ¥565 million with a small net loss of ¥9 million as a result of lower fee income and sharply higher credit costs. Hardly a ‘glittering’ performance.
Trading on a forward-looking price/earnings multiple of 11.7x (using the bank’s current FY3/2019 guidance) and a price/book ratio of 0.19x, TKFG is expensive compared to peer regional banks. Indeed, adjusting the group’s earnings per share (EPS) for the ¥55 billion (US$507 million) in two still-outstanding preference share issues raises the annualised PER to over 19x: roughly twice that of peer banks. TKFG’s RoA and RoE ratios are woefully low at 0.09% and 1.71% respectively, loan growth has shrunk to just +0.5% YoY, deposits have fallen alarmingly (down 4.5% YoY), and the overhead ratio has shot up to 95% in Q3. Yet, despite all these ‘red flags’, TKFG still managed to attract an aggregate foreign ownership of 17.4% as of 31 March 2018 (the most recent data publicly available): a strange choice. Caveat emptor (may the buyer beware) !
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
Following a long period of weakness, robotics related stocks are displaying stronger performance recently as 3Q results have come in weak, but generally done so with management reassurances that this is the bottom.
We had been negative on the sector for some time before turning more constructive in mid January following Yaskawa’s earnings. We concur with the general messaging that this is the bottom based on our analysis of order levels for the companies and regional trend breakdowns. We do not expect a particularly sharp rebound in orders and sales in the near future and believe there is still some risk of these stocks returning toward the lows over the course of the year. However, we believe that the next significant move should be upwards and longer term investors should be looking for entry timings.
Fanuc Corp (6954 JP) shows increasing signs of a basing process and opportunities on weakness.
Macro retracements display clear synergy with the low at 15,570, suggesting this is a key low.
Use weakness back toward base line support to buy for a medium term rise to press on outlined resistance targets.
Risk lies with the signs of rally fatigue in the near term tactical cycle as the daily RSI fails to confirm recent highs that are knocking on pivotal resistance at 19,000 that acts as the immediate make or break level.
Pivot levels, action points and targets are outlined.
It was reported last Thursday that Denso Corp (6902 JP) through its wholly-owned subsidiary NSITEXE, Inc. acquired a stake in quadric.io, a fabless semiconductor start-up company based in Burlingame, California. It seems that the company has begun its planned investments for 2019. Last year, Denso increased its stake (from 0.5% to 5%) inchipmaker- Renesas Electronics (6723 JP)to support its progress of ADAS and related technology. We also mentioned in our insight, Denso Prepares for the Future; Investments in Tohoku Pioneer EG Following JOLED and ThinCI, that Denso has been making a series of investments to prepare itself for being the leading software solution provider alongside its hardware expertise, supporting its change in business model. Last year, NSITEXE invested in ThinCi, its partner, since 2016, in the development ofa Data Flow Processor (DFP) designed to help autonomous vehicles make quick decisions in complicated and fast-evolving situations. Denso/NSITEXE’s investment in quadric.io has a similar goal. The investment in quadric.io is said to help the start-up in its development of edge processing units (EPUs), which are high-performance semiconductors that could be used as a foundation for enabling automated driving technology.
Since then, Monex’s share price (which was around JPY500 in mid-November 2018) has fallen to JPY367 as of 8th February 2019. This is only marginally above the pre-acquisition (of Coincheck) price of JPY344 (on 2nd April 2018). In the meantime, Bitcoin (XBTUSD CURNCY) has also fallen from around USD6,000 in mid-November to around USD3,500 at present.
We maintain our previous direction for Monex as we believe that upside is unlikely in the short run unless there is a significant improvement in cryptocurrency market conditions, despite the resumption of most of Coincheck’s services and Monex’s share price falling almost to the pre-acquisition (of Coincheck) level.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
Fashion industry is a leading polluter of water, air and land and its rapid growth has inflicted serious environmental damage in manufacturing bases across Asia. With increased consumer awareness and public scrutiny, leading brands globally have committed to adopt sustainable practices. This can mean a rise in operating costs, margin pressures which can lead to higher prices and/or lower volumes. What does that mean for corporate earnings growth and stock valuations? Our report attempts to arrive at some ballpark estimations based on a scenario analysis. Leading branded apparel companies can suffer market value destruction ranging up to 30% if their long term margins and growth assumptions are reset at lower levels following a shake-up of their existing low cost model. And, those who refuse to adapt and adopt sustainable processes could soon be shunned by ESG-led investors and environmentally mindful consumers alike, leading to valuation discounts. Investors Beware.
Over the past decades, corporate growth and profitability agenda overshadowed environmental considerations, and apparel brands have grown in an environmentally unsustainable manner. Beneath the façade of glitzy fashion magazines lies the dirty underbelly of pesticide use, water mismanagement, irresponsible effluent discharge, chemical poisoning, greenhouse gas emissions, energy overuse, micro-plastic pollution and landfill dumping. Until recently, the notion that apparel retailers should be responsible and accountable for the environmental infringements in their highly fragmented but globalised supply chain was an unwelcome idea. Under pressure from consumers and activists, this is now changing. With ESG-led investing going mainstream, investors too may start to take notice.
The detailed report below includes:
Summary and conclusions from the study on Fast Fashion’s environmental footprint in Asia and impact of rise in consumer awareness on global apparel companies
Understanding Fast fashion
Fast Fashion trends in Asia – Survey findings on consumer attitudes to shopping and environmental issues
Environmental issues in Asia due to Fast fashion
Sustainable clothing – an emerging trend, and what can turn it mainstream
Investing in Fast fashion: between a rock and a hard place – a Valuation vulnerability analysis
Sustainability & 13 leading fast Fashion players – how future ready are they?
This report was prepared jointly by the team at Investory – Devi Subhakesan , Rohinee Sharma and Shilpa Krishnan. Investory commissioned an exclusive survey for this report to understand young urban Asian consumers’ attitude towards fast fashion and their understanding of environmental issues.
We see oil exploration making a comeback in 2019, as drilling spending sees an increase and on the back of encouraging well results year to date. Already in 2019 there have been 4 high impact discoveries in the UK, South Africa and Guyana. Given the need of companies, especially the majors, to replenish their portfolios, there will still be a number of frontier, high impact wells being drilled. The areas where we see material exploration wells being drilled this year are Guyana, US GoM, Mexico, Brazil the Eastern Mediterranean and West Africa.
If there is some exploration success, the pure-play exploration companies will be good performers, especially those that have exposure to several wells that could be material relative to their size. A pick up in drilling will also be positive for the offshore drilling companies and seismic names. We look at the merits and pitfalls of investing in exploration, performance in 2018, outlook for 2019, the debate over exploring for resource versus buying it, how the economics of exploration have improved and the impact of the time value of money.
Forward earnings will focus heavily on the debut of PS5, the performance of the new Spider-Man movie and other core content revenue streams for the company this year.
Some see Sony as coasting on historically successes of the past, others see recent Disney and ATT deals acquiring content competitors, as a prelude to a play on Sony this year.
Investor pressure to sell or spin off non-content businesses growing due to continued poor performance in mobile and possible profitable departure from semiconductor sector.
Tokyo Kiraboshi Financial Group (7173 JP) (TKFG) progresses from bad to worse, and its stock price is behaving accordingly. Amidst volatile trading, the share price is gradually sinking back towards the 52-week intra-day low of ¥1,454 that was reached on Christmas Day 2018 before closing that day at ¥1,504. 3Q FY3/2019 (9 months to 31 December 2018) consolidated results represented a decline of over 56% YoY at the recurring profit level, with net profits down 34% YoY after tax adjustments. On a quarterly basis, Q3 (October-December 2018) net operating profits collapsed 96% to just ¥66 million, while recurring profits fell 68% YoY to just ¥565 million with a small net loss of ¥9 million as a result of lower fee income and sharply higher credit costs. Hardly a ‘glittering’ performance.
Trading on a forward-looking price/earnings multiple of 11.7x (using the bank’s current FY3/2019 guidance) and a price/book ratio of 0.19x, TKFG is expensive compared to peer regional banks. Indeed, adjusting the group’s earnings per share (EPS) for the ¥55 billion (US$507 million) in two still-outstanding preference share issues raises the annualised PER to over 19x: roughly twice that of peer banks. TKFG’s RoA and RoE ratios are woefully low at 0.09% and 1.71% respectively, loan growth has shrunk to just +0.5% YoY, deposits have fallen alarmingly (down 4.5% YoY), and the overhead ratio has shot up to 95% in Q3. Yet, despite all these ‘red flags’, TKFG still managed to attract an aggregate foreign ownership of 17.4% as of 31 March 2018 (the most recent data publicly available): a strange choice. Caveat emptor (may the buyer beware) !
The Tender Offer is to purchase a minimum of 45,758,400 shares at ¥559/share, which is a 5.67% premium to today’s close and a 46.3% premium to the undisturbed price of 23 January 2019. Obtaining the minimum would get the combination of KDDI and MUFJ Securities (which currently holds 52.96% of the shares outstanding, and will not tender) to 66.67% which would allow the combination to do a Two Step Squeezeout, which KDDI states in the document that it intends to do.
Anti-trust and regulatory approvals are required, and KDDI expects that the Tender Offer will commence in late April. This looks pretty easy as a deal, with few impediments. A rival bid is unlikely in the extreme, KDDI has a headstart with the shares of MUFG Bank which have committed to the deal.
There are a couple interesting aspects to this deal, and KDDI made several other announcements simultaneously which taken together show some of the extent of KDDI’s plans.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
Following a long period of weakness, robotics related stocks are displaying stronger performance recently as 3Q results have come in weak, but generally done so with management reassurances that this is the bottom.
We had been negative on the sector for some time before turning more constructive in mid January following Yaskawa’s earnings. We concur with the general messaging that this is the bottom based on our analysis of order levels for the companies and regional trend breakdowns. We do not expect a particularly sharp rebound in orders and sales in the near future and believe there is still some risk of these stocks returning toward the lows over the course of the year. However, we believe that the next significant move should be upwards and longer term investors should be looking for entry timings.
Fanuc Corp (6954 JP) shows increasing signs of a basing process and opportunities on weakness.
Macro retracements display clear synergy with the low at 15,570, suggesting this is a key low.
Use weakness back toward base line support to buy for a medium term rise to press on outlined resistance targets.
Risk lies with the signs of rally fatigue in the near term tactical cycle as the daily RSI fails to confirm recent highs that are knocking on pivotal resistance at 19,000 that acts as the immediate make or break level.
Pivot levels, action points and targets are outlined.
It was reported last Thursday that Denso Corp (6902 JP) through its wholly-owned subsidiary NSITEXE, Inc. acquired a stake in quadric.io, a fabless semiconductor start-up company based in Burlingame, California. It seems that the company has begun its planned investments for 2019. Last year, Denso increased its stake (from 0.5% to 5%) inchipmaker- Renesas Electronics (6723 JP)to support its progress of ADAS and related technology. We also mentioned in our insight, Denso Prepares for the Future; Investments in Tohoku Pioneer EG Following JOLED and ThinCI, that Denso has been making a series of investments to prepare itself for being the leading software solution provider alongside its hardware expertise, supporting its change in business model. Last year, NSITEXE invested in ThinCi, its partner, since 2016, in the development ofa Data Flow Processor (DFP) designed to help autonomous vehicles make quick decisions in complicated and fast-evolving situations. Denso/NSITEXE’s investment in quadric.io has a similar goal. The investment in quadric.io is said to help the start-up in its development of edge processing units (EPUs), which are high-performance semiconductors that could be used as a foundation for enabling automated driving technology.
Since then, Monex’s share price (which was around JPY500 in mid-November 2018) has fallen to JPY367 as of 8th February 2019. This is only marginally above the pre-acquisition (of Coincheck) price of JPY344 (on 2nd April 2018). In the meantime, Bitcoin (XBTUSD CURNCY) has also fallen from around USD6,000 in mid-November to around USD3,500 at present.
We maintain our previous direction for Monex as we believe that upside is unlikely in the short run unless there is a significant improvement in cryptocurrency market conditions, despite the resumption of most of Coincheck’s services and Monex’s share price falling almost to the pre-acquisition (of Coincheck) level.
This insight starts with a bit of history. It is entirely extraneous to the data, but I think the history is kind of fun (iron ore, Baltic Dry, and shipping has been a ‘hobby’ of mine for years). If you want to get right to the data, go to the Thin Red Line.
On the 24th of May, 1744, an announcement appeared in TheDaily Post (The Daily Poſt) that the Virginia and Maryland coffee house in Threadneedle Street, London (just east of the Bank of England) had changed its name to Virginia and Baltick Coffee House.
This is to give notice that the House, late the Virginia and Maryland Coffee-house in Threadneedle Street, near the Royal Exchange, is now open’d by the Name of the Virginia & Baltick Coffee-house, where all Foreign and Domestick News are taken in ; and all Letters or Parcels, directed to Merchants or Captains in the Virginia or Baltick Trade will be carefully deliver’d according as directed, and the best Attendance given, by Reynallds and Winboult.
Note, Punch made in any Quantity, in the greatest Perfection, without Adulteration, which is seldom found in any of the most noted Houses ; also Brandy, Rum, and Arrack (neat as imported) are sold in the Vaults under the Coffee-House, at the lowest Prices; where all Customers, we have had the Favour of serving at our late Warehouse in Leadenhall Street, we hope will continue to send their Orders as above.
We have receiv’d Advice, that Several Bags of Letters and Parcels are coming which are directed to be left at the above Coffee-House
This was perhaps because Virginia and Maryland as a name was slightly redundant. Virginia and Maryland are next to each other (if you dropped cargo in Baltimore, you went past Virginia to get there). It was perhaps because trade with Russia and Baltic countries in tallow (from Russia) used to make candles and soap [more candles than soap as Georgian England was still under the idea bathing might invite the plague to enter the pores], flax, hemp (both from modern-day Estonia and Latvia, and Russia), and other goods was fast climbing after The Muscovy Company (originally founded as The Merchant Adventurers to New Lands in 1551 to look for a northeast passage to China) lost its monopoly (enjoyed since 1555) on English trade with Russia in 1698 (though the company’s activities had been somewhat or at times largely curtailed for 50 years after the execution of Charles I of England in 1648).
The Baltic routes were effectively the same as created by the Hanseatic League many hundreds of years before when German traders in the Baltic traded wares down to the Netherlands and even London, from Livonia (Riga and northward) or Livländ as the Hansa states would have called it. And the same products were shipped on that route for almost a thousand years.
In Regency/Georgian England, flax, for example, came from Königsburg (54-55º N at 21º E), then Memel (Dermemel on the map) just up the coast, Libnau a bit further north, Riga just off the map at around 56º N, then Pernel (Latvia), Revel (Estonia), and St Petersburg further to the northeast (further off the map unfortunately). Timber imports grew dramatically after the Great Fire of London, and as imports grew and English shipbuilding increased, timber to build ships (including specifically, masts) was sourced from Norway in the late 1600s then increasingly the East Country (north Europe, Livonia (specifically Memel)) and Russia.
source: Barry Lawrence Ruderman Antique Maps (and the map)
In any case, the new name more accurately represented the business interests of those who congregated there.
The Virginia & Baltick was the place to source North Atlantic and Baltic cargoes, and cargoes rose in volume dramatically from the mid 1700s through the mid 1800s, with a drop only in the early 1810s.
In 1810, the Virginia & Baltick took over the premises of a nearby establishment called the Antwerp Tavern – also on Threadneedle – which was a considerably larger building (in the Hearth Tax (an annual levy of two shillings per annum, to make up the shortfall of ale and beer taxes paid to the sovereign) returns of 1662 it was noted as having 18 hearths). It was renamed the Baltic Coffee House then (it was also periodically the meeting place of the Albion Lodge of Masons).
Long since replaced, as far as I can tell it was located on the SE corner of Threadneedle and the alley behind the Royal Exchange. By 1823, the wild speculations in commodities and the laxity of theretofore informal arrangements on the Second Floor made it imperative for the senior tallow chandlers, soapmakers, and cargo brokers to form a Member’s Club (limited to 300). Rules were established (they are below in the Appendix).
In 1857, the Virginia & Baltick established a company, The Baltic Company Limited, and arrangements were made to take over the lease of the South Sea House (original home to the South Sea Company) at the end of Threadneedle Street. In 1900, the Baltic Exchange was incorporated as a private limited company – the Baltic Mercantile And Shipping Exchange, Limited. and took over the London Shipping Exchange. In 1903, the company established its own purpose-built premises in St. Mary’s Axe. In 1992, an IRA bomb demolished 30 St. Mary’s Axe and a few years later, permanent premises were found at 38 St. Mary’s Axe.
Nota Bene: Before the Great Fire of 1748, the most famous of London’s coffee shops were on the south side of the Royal Exchange – with most in the small area named Exchange Alley and on Birchin, and with Lloyd’s on Lombard Street (corner of Lombard and Abchurch Lane if I remember correctly). The area north and west of the Exchange was oriented towards taverns. The location of the Antwerp Tavern in relation to the map below was roughly where the bolded name of Antwerp Tavern is in the paragraph above.
A map of Coffee Houses Before the Great Fire
In 1985, the Baltic Exchange first calculated its Baltic Freight Index (now the Baltic Dry Index) as an “assessment” of conditions and charter rates amongst a panel of independent ship brokers across nearly two-dozen specific routes (all routes reported have year-round fixtures – not seasonal routes like the Great Lakes) and ship sizes (and since July 1, 2009 is an average of Handysize, Supramax, Panamax, and Capesize Timecharter averages), the data for which is then verified and averaged by the Exchange, and disseminated to members. The route specifics are quite detailed and require “massaging” in order to get normalized data from the specified delivery item (for Capesize Route C2, it is a 180kmt DWT ship on 18.2m SSW draft, max age 10yrs, LOA 290m, beam 45m, TPC 121, 198kcbm grain, 14 knots laden, 15 knots ballast on 62mt fuel oil (380cst) no diesel at sea with the route details as below).
C2: Tubarao to Rotterdam. 160,000lt iron ore, 10% more or less in owner’s option, free in and out. Laydays/cancelling 20/35 days from index date. 6 days, Sundays + holidays included all purposes. 6 hrs turn time at loading port, 6 hrs turn time at discharge port, 0.5% in lieu of weighing. Freight based on long tons. Age max 18 yrs. 3.75% total commission.
There are audits of the brokers, and no shipbrokers are allowed to have “money in the market.” A full index methodology document is available for those who care for it (message me for the PDF).
It’s That Time Of Year, Again.
The Baltic Dry Index (BDIY INDEX) is an indicator published by The Baltic Exchange, in London, first distributed in 1985 and something which gained popularity as a tool for equity investors to “see” the bulk market in the early 2000s.
data: Baltic Exchange, etc
The index has changed somewhat over the years with the current calculation starting in 2009. It is currently calculated as an average of the Capesize, Panamax, Supramax, and Handysize TimeCharter averages, with a slightly complicated weighting system across a variety of routes. An example for Capesize is in the Appendix (below the Rules & Regulations of the Baltic Coffee House of 1823). Most of the routes have a very heavy weighting to Asia. 75% of the weights of Capesize, Panamax, and Supramax have an Asia or Trans-Pacific end of leg to them (Handysize is 50% Asia end, 50% Europe end).
The increased interest on the part of non-freight customers was because the advent of dramatic increases in raw materials imports to China in the early 2000s meant a significant squeeze on ship time. And because there is seasonality to China and its raw materials imports, more seasonality started showing up in the Baltic Dry Index.
Generically, when raw material pricing goes up because raw material demand goes up, bulker rates go up. When raw material pricing goes up because of natural disaster-induced shortages, the effect can be mixed. For example, if for whatever reason iron ore could not be shipped from Australia to China for a period, shipping costs might rise dramatically (if the materials themselves existed to be exported from elsewhere) simply because of greater ship time to export from say Tubarao to China than from Western Australia to China. Right now, the China-based cost to ship a tonne of iron ore from WA to China is less than US$5 while from Tubarao it is $13. If a serious Brazil export drop were to occur, iron ore would go up in price because of the near-term scarcity, but freight prices might not go up that much because the change in time per tonne required to ship would drop (though they might go up on a scarcity of appropriate ships).
In any case, that China seasonality has another very interesting and over-riding characteristic.
And it has to do with Chinese New Year.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
We see oil exploration making a comeback in 2019, as drilling spending sees an increase and on the back of encouraging well results year to date. Already in 2019 there have been 4 high impact discoveries in the UK, South Africa and Guyana. Given the need of companies, especially the majors, to replenish their portfolios, there will still be a number of frontier, high impact wells being drilled. The areas where we see material exploration wells being drilled this year are Guyana, US GoM, Mexico, Brazil the Eastern Mediterranean and West Africa.
If there is some exploration success, the pure-play exploration companies will be good performers, especially those that have exposure to several wells that could be material relative to their size. A pick up in drilling will also be positive for the offshore drilling companies and seismic names. We look at the merits and pitfalls of investing in exploration, performance in 2018, outlook for 2019, the debate over exploring for resource versus buying it, how the economics of exploration have improved and the impact of the time value of money.
Forward earnings will focus heavily on the debut of PS5, the performance of the new Spider-Man movie and other core content revenue streams for the company this year.
Some see Sony as coasting on historically successes of the past, others see recent Disney and ATT deals acquiring content competitors, as a prelude to a play on Sony this year.
Investor pressure to sell or spin off non-content businesses growing due to continued poor performance in mobile and possible profitable departure from semiconductor sector.
Tokyo Kiraboshi Financial Group (7173 JP) (TKFG) progresses from bad to worse, and its stock price is behaving accordingly. Amidst volatile trading, the share price is gradually sinking back towards the 52-week intra-day low of ¥1,454 that was reached on Christmas Day 2018 before closing that day at ¥1,504. 3Q FY3/2019 (9 months to 31 December 2018) consolidated results represented a decline of over 56% YoY at the recurring profit level, with net profits down 34% YoY after tax adjustments. On a quarterly basis, Q3 (October-December 2018) net operating profits collapsed 96% to just ¥66 million, while recurring profits fell 68% YoY to just ¥565 million with a small net loss of ¥9 million as a result of lower fee income and sharply higher credit costs. Hardly a ‘glittering’ performance.
Trading on a forward-looking price/earnings multiple of 11.7x (using the bank’s current FY3/2019 guidance) and a price/book ratio of 0.19x, TKFG is expensive compared to peer regional banks. Indeed, adjusting the group’s earnings per share (EPS) for the ¥55 billion (US$507 million) in two still-outstanding preference share issues raises the annualised PER to over 19x: roughly twice that of peer banks. TKFG’s RoA and RoE ratios are woefully low at 0.09% and 1.71% respectively, loan growth has shrunk to just +0.5% YoY, deposits have fallen alarmingly (down 4.5% YoY), and the overhead ratio has shot up to 95% in Q3. Yet, despite all these ‘red flags’, TKFG still managed to attract an aggregate foreign ownership of 17.4% as of 31 March 2018 (the most recent data publicly available): a strange choice. Caveat emptor (may the buyer beware) !
The Tender Offer is to purchase a minimum of 45,758,400 shares at ¥559/share, which is a 5.67% premium to today’s close and a 46.3% premium to the undisturbed price of 23 January 2019. Obtaining the minimum would get the combination of KDDI and MUFJ Securities (which currently holds 52.96% of the shares outstanding, and will not tender) to 66.67% which would allow the combination to do a Two Step Squeezeout, which KDDI states in the document that it intends to do.
Anti-trust and regulatory approvals are required, and KDDI expects that the Tender Offer will commence in late April. This looks pretty easy as a deal, with few impediments. A rival bid is unlikely in the extreme, KDDI has a headstart with the shares of MUFG Bank which have committed to the deal.
There are a couple interesting aspects to this deal, and KDDI made several other announcements simultaneously which taken together show some of the extent of KDDI’s plans.
Following a long period of weakness, robotics related stocks are displaying stronger performance recently as 3Q results have come in weak, but generally done so with management reassurances that this is the bottom.
We had been negative on the sector for some time before turning more constructive in mid January following Yaskawa’s earnings. We concur with the general messaging that this is the bottom based on our analysis of order levels for the companies and regional trend breakdowns. We do not expect a particularly sharp rebound in orders and sales in the near future and believe there is still some risk of these stocks returning toward the lows over the course of the year. However, we believe that the next significant move should be upwards and longer term investors should be looking for entry timings.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
Fanuc Corp (6954 JP) shows increasing signs of a basing process and opportunities on weakness.
Macro retracements display clear synergy with the low at 15,570, suggesting this is a key low.
Use weakness back toward base line support to buy for a medium term rise to press on outlined resistance targets.
Risk lies with the signs of rally fatigue in the near term tactical cycle as the daily RSI fails to confirm recent highs that are knocking on pivotal resistance at 19,000 that acts as the immediate make or break level.
Pivot levels, action points and targets are outlined.
It was reported last Thursday that Denso Corp (6902 JP) through its wholly-owned subsidiary NSITEXE, Inc. acquired a stake in quadric.io, a fabless semiconductor start-up company based in Burlingame, California. It seems that the company has begun its planned investments for 2019. Last year, Denso increased its stake (from 0.5% to 5%) inchipmaker- Renesas Electronics (6723 JP)to support its progress of ADAS and related technology. We also mentioned in our insight, Denso Prepares for the Future; Investments in Tohoku Pioneer EG Following JOLED and ThinCI, that Denso has been making a series of investments to prepare itself for being the leading software solution provider alongside its hardware expertise, supporting its change in business model. Last year, NSITEXE invested in ThinCi, its partner, since 2016, in the development ofa Data Flow Processor (DFP) designed to help autonomous vehicles make quick decisions in complicated and fast-evolving situations. Denso/NSITEXE’s investment in quadric.io has a similar goal. The investment in quadric.io is said to help the start-up in its development of edge processing units (EPUs), which are high-performance semiconductors that could be used as a foundation for enabling automated driving technology.
Since then, Monex’s share price (which was around JPY500 in mid-November 2018) has fallen to JPY367 as of 8th February 2019. This is only marginally above the pre-acquisition (of Coincheck) price of JPY344 (on 2nd April 2018). In the meantime, Bitcoin (XBTUSD CURNCY) has also fallen from around USD6,000 in mid-November to around USD3,500 at present.
We maintain our previous direction for Monex as we believe that upside is unlikely in the short run unless there is a significant improvement in cryptocurrency market conditions, despite the resumption of most of Coincheck’s services and Monex’s share price falling almost to the pre-acquisition (of Coincheck) level.
This insight starts with a bit of history. It is entirely extraneous to the data, but I think the history is kind of fun (iron ore, Baltic Dry, and shipping has been a ‘hobby’ of mine for years). If you want to get right to the data, go to the Thin Red Line.
On the 24th of May, 1744, an announcement appeared in TheDaily Post (The Daily Poſt) that the Virginia and Maryland coffee house in Threadneedle Street, London (just east of the Bank of England) had changed its name to Virginia and Baltick Coffee House.
This is to give notice that the House, late the Virginia and Maryland Coffee-house in Threadneedle Street, near the Royal Exchange, is now open’d by the Name of the Virginia & Baltick Coffee-house, where all Foreign and Domestick News are taken in ; and all Letters or Parcels, directed to Merchants or Captains in the Virginia or Baltick Trade will be carefully deliver’d according as directed, and the best Attendance given, by Reynallds and Winboult.
Note, Punch made in any Quantity, in the greatest Perfection, without Adulteration, which is seldom found in any of the most noted Houses ; also Brandy, Rum, and Arrack (neat as imported) are sold in the Vaults under the Coffee-House, at the lowest Prices; where all Customers, we have had the Favour of serving at our late Warehouse in Leadenhall Street, we hope will continue to send their Orders as above.
We have receiv’d Advice, that Several Bags of Letters and Parcels are coming which are directed to be left at the above Coffee-House
This was perhaps because Virginia and Maryland as a name was slightly redundant. Virginia and Maryland are next to each other (if you dropped cargo in Baltimore, you went past Virginia to get there). It was perhaps because trade with Russia and Baltic countries in tallow (from Russia) used to make candles and soap [more candles than soap as Georgian England was still under the idea bathing might invite the plague to enter the pores], flax, hemp (both from modern-day Estonia and Latvia, and Russia), and other goods was fast climbing after The Muscovy Company (originally founded as The Merchant Adventurers to New Lands in 1551 to look for a northeast passage to China) lost its monopoly (enjoyed since 1555) on English trade with Russia in 1698 (though the company’s activities had been somewhat or at times largely curtailed for 50 years after the execution of Charles I of England in 1648).
The Baltic routes were effectively the same as created by the Hanseatic League many hundreds of years before when German traders in the Baltic traded wares down to the Netherlands and even London, from Livonia (Riga and northward) or Livländ as the Hansa states would have called it. And the same products were shipped on that route for almost a thousand years.
In Regency/Georgian England, flax, for example, came from Königsburg (54-55º N at 21º E), then Memel (Dermemel on the map) just up the coast, Libnau a bit further north, Riga just off the map at around 56º N, then Pernel (Latvia), Revel (Estonia), and St Petersburg further to the northeast (further off the map unfortunately). Timber imports grew dramatically after the Great Fire of London, and as imports grew and English shipbuilding increased, timber to build ships (including specifically, masts) was sourced from Norway in the late 1600s then increasingly the East Country (north Europe, Livonia (specifically Memel)) and Russia.
source: Barry Lawrence Ruderman Antique Maps (and the map)
In any case, the new name more accurately represented the business interests of those who congregated there.
The Virginia & Baltick was the place to source North Atlantic and Baltic cargoes, and cargoes rose in volume dramatically from the mid 1700s through the mid 1800s, with a drop only in the early 1810s.
In 1810, the Virginia & Baltick took over the premises of a nearby establishment called the Antwerp Tavern – also on Threadneedle – which was a considerably larger building (in the Hearth Tax (an annual levy of two shillings per annum, to make up the shortfall of ale and beer taxes paid to the sovereign) returns of 1662 it was noted as having 18 hearths). It was renamed the Baltic Coffee House then (it was also periodically the meeting place of the Albion Lodge of Masons).
Long since replaced, as far as I can tell it was located on the SE corner of Threadneedle and the alley behind the Royal Exchange. By 1823, the wild speculations in commodities and the laxity of theretofore informal arrangements on the Second Floor made it imperative for the senior tallow chandlers, soapmakers, and cargo brokers to form a Member’s Club (limited to 300). Rules were established (they are below in the Appendix).
In 1857, the Virginia & Baltick established a company, The Baltic Company Limited, and arrangements were made to take over the lease of the South Sea House (original home to the South Sea Company) at the end of Threadneedle Street. In 1900, the Baltic Exchange was incorporated as a private limited company – the Baltic Mercantile And Shipping Exchange, Limited. and took over the London Shipping Exchange. In 1903, the company established its own purpose-built premises in St. Mary’s Axe. In 1992, an IRA bomb demolished 30 St. Mary’s Axe and a few years later, permanent premises were found at 38 St. Mary’s Axe.
Nota Bene: Before the Great Fire of 1748, the most famous of London’s coffee shops were on the south side of the Royal Exchange – with most in the small area named Exchange Alley and on Birchin, and with Lloyd’s on Lombard Street (corner of Lombard and Abchurch Lane if I remember correctly). The area north and west of the Exchange was oriented towards taverns. The location of the Antwerp Tavern in relation to the map below was roughly where the bolded name of Antwerp Tavern is in the paragraph above.
A map of Coffee Houses Before the Great Fire
In 1985, the Baltic Exchange first calculated its Baltic Freight Index (now the Baltic Dry Index) as an “assessment” of conditions and charter rates amongst a panel of independent ship brokers across nearly two-dozen specific routes (all routes reported have year-round fixtures – not seasonal routes like the Great Lakes) and ship sizes (and since July 1, 2009 is an average of Handysize, Supramax, Panamax, and Capesize Timecharter averages), the data for which is then verified and averaged by the Exchange, and disseminated to members. The route specifics are quite detailed and require “massaging” in order to get normalized data from the specified delivery item (for Capesize Route C2, it is a 180kmt DWT ship on 18.2m SSW draft, max age 10yrs, LOA 290m, beam 45m, TPC 121, 198kcbm grain, 14 knots laden, 15 knots ballast on 62mt fuel oil (380cst) no diesel at sea with the route details as below).
C2: Tubarao to Rotterdam. 160,000lt iron ore, 10% more or less in owner’s option, free in and out. Laydays/cancelling 20/35 days from index date. 6 days, Sundays + holidays included all purposes. 6 hrs turn time at loading port, 6 hrs turn time at discharge port, 0.5% in lieu of weighing. Freight based on long tons. Age max 18 yrs. 3.75% total commission.
There are audits of the brokers, and no shipbrokers are allowed to have “money in the market.” A full index methodology document is available for those who care for it (message me for the PDF).
It’s That Time Of Year, Again.
The Baltic Dry Index (BDIY INDEX) is an indicator published by The Baltic Exchange, in London, first distributed in 1985 and something which gained popularity as a tool for equity investors to “see” the bulk market in the early 2000s.
data: Baltic Exchange, etc
The index has changed somewhat over the years with the current calculation starting in 2009. It is currently calculated as an average of the Capesize, Panamax, Supramax, and Handysize TimeCharter averages, with a slightly complicated weighting system across a variety of routes. An example for Capesize is in the Appendix (below the Rules & Regulations of the Baltic Coffee House of 1823). Most of the routes have a very heavy weighting to Asia. 75% of the weights of Capesize, Panamax, and Supramax have an Asia or Trans-Pacific end of leg to them (Handysize is 50% Asia end, 50% Europe end).
The increased interest on the part of non-freight customers was because the advent of dramatic increases in raw materials imports to China in the early 2000s meant a significant squeeze on ship time. And because there is seasonality to China and its raw materials imports, more seasonality started showing up in the Baltic Dry Index.
Generically, when raw material pricing goes up because raw material demand goes up, bulker rates go up. When raw material pricing goes up because of natural disaster-induced shortages, the effect can be mixed. For example, if for whatever reason iron ore could not be shipped from Australia to China for a period, shipping costs might rise dramatically (if the materials themselves existed to be exported from elsewhere) simply because of greater ship time to export from say Tubarao to China than from Western Australia to China. Right now, the China-based cost to ship a tonne of iron ore from WA to China is less than US$5 while from Tubarao it is $13. If a serious Brazil export drop were to occur, iron ore would go up in price because of the near-term scarcity, but freight prices might not go up that much because the change in time per tonne required to ship would drop (though they might go up on a scarcity of appropriate ships).
In any case, that China seasonality has another very interesting and over-riding characteristic.
And it has to do with Chinese New Year.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
