CHILLING – A winter chill has descended over the Japanese equity market. As we covered in our Insight on market aggregate earnings Japan: Winter Results & Revisions Flash the net income of corporate Japan peaked on 26th December, However, reported earnings are a lagging indicator, and in this instance, the ‘lag’ was almost one year, with the Total Market Capitalisation (excluding REITs) peaking on 23rd January 2018. Our preferred, and often leading, indicators are the All-Market Composite Results Score – a measure of the trend and momentum in quarterly corporate earnings the All-Market Composite Forecast/Revision Score – which measures the trend and rate of change in company initial forecasts and revisions. The Results Score peaked on 1st February 2018, seven trading days after the market peak and is now one year into an extended period of decline. The Forecast/Revision Score is slowing peaked out on 27th October 2017, three months ahead of the market and the Results Score – demonstrating the reliability of company forecasts, as opposed to ‘consensus’, as a leading indicator of future earnings. Revisions have continued to ‘lead’ on the way down and 0.55 points ‘ahead’. Â
Source: Japan Analytics
TURNING NEGATIVE? – Subtracting the Forecast/Revision Score from the Results Score shows the extent of the lag in the latter. The relationship has been relatively stable of over one year; however, as we ‘roll’ into the next fiscal year’s forecasts in May, we can expect the difference to move closer to zero as both scores turn negative. As the cycle bottoms out, the revisions will recover ahead of results, and the difference will also become negative, setting the stage for the next upswing in later 2019 or early 2020. Â
Source: Japan Analytics
On each of the three occasions since 2006 when the Results Score has fallen below ‘4’, it has subsequently fallen below zero. In 2012, the decline was muted by the advent of the Bank of Japan (BOJ)’s policy of weakening the currency. The current score of 2.14 suggests we are continuing on a path to zero and below. Failing a currency move through „115 (see below), the Results Score should turn negative by the time the full-year results are announced next May. We also expect a high degree of caution in forecasting, especially on the Auto sector which is overshadowed by the prospect of US tariffs. The announcement of the closer of Honda Motor (7267 JP)‘s car plant in Swindon in the UK is not a good portent. Â
Source: Japan Analytics
BEAR MARKET RALLY & THE YEN – Total Market Value has recovered by 13.8% since Christmas Day and is currently at the same level as when we published our Autumn review – SloMo Slowdown. With earnings and revisions heading lower, the implied expectation is for some or all of – a further central bank easing, a resolution of current trade tensions, and a weakening of the Yen. The last has been the ‘get-out-of-jail’ card for Japanese equities. Our chart compares the year-on-year percentage change in the US$/„ exchange rate with a lag of six months to the Combined Results and Revision Score (with each sore being equally-weighted). The last eight turning points for the rate of change of the cross rate, have coincided with directional changes in earnings and revisions momentum. The recent weakness in the currency suggests a more stable market – at least until the late spring.Â
RECOMMENDATION – Although current valuations are attractive, we believe the market is correctly anticipating further declines in earnings momentum over the next few quarters. We would stay underweight Japanese equities by 20% (i.e. 5.5% v. 7%) with a bias towards domestic sectors, notably, Information Technology, Telecommunications, Media, Healthcare & Commercial Services. We would not hedge the currency.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the worldâs leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
CHILLING – A winter chill has descended over the Japanese equity market. As we covered in our Insight on market aggregate earnings Japan: Winter Results & Revisions Flash the net income of corporate Japan peaked on 26th December, However, reported earnings are a lagging indicator, and in this instance, the ‘lag’ was almost one year, with the Total Market Capitalisation (excluding REITs) peaking on 23rd January 2018. Our preferred, and often leading, indicators are the All-Market Composite Results Score – a measure of the trend and momentum in quarterly corporate earnings the All-Market Composite Forecast/Revision Score – which measures the trend and rate of change in company initial forecasts and revisions. The Results Score peaked on 1st February 2018, seven trading days after the market peak and is now one year into an extended period of decline. The Forecast/Revision Score is slowing peaked out on 27th October 2017, three months ahead of the market and the Results Score – demonstrating the reliability of company forecasts, as opposed to ‘consensus’, as a leading indicator of future earnings. Revisions have continued to ‘lead’ on the way down and 0.55 points ‘ahead’. Â
Source: Japan Analytics
TURNING NEGATIVE? – Subtracting the Forecast/Revision Score from the Results Score shows the extent of the lag in the latter. The relationship has been relatively stable of over one year; however, as we ‘roll’ into the next fiscal year’s forecasts in May, we can expect the difference to move closer to zero as both scores turn negative. As the cycle bottoms out, the revisions will recover ahead of results, and the difference will also become negative, setting the stage for the next upswing in later 2019 or early 2020. Â
Source: Japan Analytics
On each of the three occasions since 2006 when the Results Score has fallen below ‘4’, it has subsequently fallen below zero. In 2012, the decline was muted by the advent of the Bank of Japan (BOJ)’s policy of weakening the currency. The current score of 2.14 suggests we are continuing on a path to zero and below. Failing a currency move through „115 (see below), the Results Score should turn negative by the time the full-year results are announced next May. We also expect a high degree of caution in forecasting, especially on the Auto sector which is overshadowed by the prospect of US tariffs. The announcement of the closer of Honda Motor (7267 JP)‘s car plant in Swindon in the UK is not a good portent. Â
Source: Japan Analytics
BEAR MARKET RALLY & THE YEN – Total Market Value has recovered by 13.8% since Christmas Day and is currently at the same level as when we published our Autumn review – SloMo Slowdown. With earnings and revisions heading lower, the implied expectation is for some or all of – a further central bank easing, a resolution of current trade tensions, and a weakening of the Yen. The last has been the ‘get-out-of-jail’ card for Japanese equities. Our chart compares the year-on-year percentage change in the US$/„ exchange rate with a lag of six months to the Combined Results and Revision Score (with each sore being equally-weighted). The last eight turning points for the rate of change of the cross rate, have coincided with directional changes in earnings and revisions momentum. The recent weakness in the currency suggests a more stable market – at least until the late spring.Â
RECOMMENDATION – Although current valuations are attractive, we believe the market is correctly anticipating further declines in earnings momentum over the next few quarters. We would stay underweight Japanese equities by 20% (i.e. 5.5% v. 7%) with a bias towards domestic sectors, notably, Information Technology, Telecommunications, Media, Healthcare & Commercial Services. We would not hedge the currency.
The Ministry of Industry Affairs and Communications (MIC, the regulator) will allocate 2.2 GHz of new spectrum bandwidth by the end of March equal to 2.8x the existing spectrum base. This is not unexpected but we think this is a good opportunity to re-iterate some of the positive points on 5G spectrum as operators make their final applications this month and we wait for a final decision in six weeks. Importantly, with ten spectrum channels, not everyone will be treated equally although all should benefit. We expect Rakuten Inc (4755 JP)  to pick up one-two bands whilst KDDI Corp (9433 JP) , NTT Docomo Inc (9437 JP) and Softbank Corp (9434 JP)  should all receive at least two.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the worldâs leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
CHILLING – A winter chill has descended over the Japanese equity market. As we covered in our Insight on market aggregate earnings Japan: Winter Results & Revisions Flash the net income of corporate Japan peaked on 26th December, However, reported earnings are a lagging indicator, and in this instance, the ‘lag’ was almost one year, with the Total Market Capitalisation (excluding REITs) peaking on 23rd January 2018. Our preferred, and often leading, indicators are the All-Market Composite Results Score – a measure of the trend and momentum in quarterly corporate earnings the All-Market Composite Forecast/Revision Score – which measures the trend and rate of change in company initial forecasts and revisions. The Results Score peaked on 1st February 2018, seven trading days after the market peak and is now one year into an extended period of decline. The Forecast/Revision Score is slowing peaked out on 27th October 2017, three months ahead of the market and the Results Score – demonstrating the reliability of company forecasts, as opposed to ‘consensus’, as a leading indicator of future earnings. Revisions have continued to ‘lead’ on the way down and 0.55 points ‘ahead’. Â
Source: Japan Analytics
TURNING NEGATIVE? – Subtracting the Forecast/Revision Score from the Results Score shows the extent of the lag in the latter. The relationship has been relatively stable of over one year; however, as we ‘roll’ into the next fiscal year’s forecasts in May, we can expect the difference to move closer to zero as both scores turn negative. As the cycle bottoms out, the revisions will recover ahead of results, and the difference will also become negative, setting the stage for the next upswing in later 2019 or early 2020. Â
Source: Japan Analytics
On each of the three occasions since 2006 when the Results Score has fallen below ‘4’, it has subsequently fallen below zero. In 2012, the decline was muted by the advent of the Bank of Japan (BOJ)’s policy of weakening the currency. The current score of 2.14 suggests we are continuing on a path to zero and below. Failing a currency move through „115 (see below), the Results Score should turn negative by the time the full-year results are announced next May. We also expect a high degree of caution in forecasting, especially on the Auto sector which is overshadowed by the prospect of US tariffs. The announcement of the closer of Honda Motor (7267 JP)‘s car plant in Swindon in the UK is not a good portent. Â
Source: Japan Analytics
BEAR MARKET RALLY & THE YEN – Total Market Value has recovered by 13.8% since Christmas Day and is currently at the same level as when we published our Autumn review – SloMo Slowdown. With earnings and revisions heading lower, the implied expectation is for some or all of – a further central bank easing, a resolution of current trade tensions, and a weakening of the Yen. The last has been the ‘get-out-of-jail’ card for Japanese equities. Our chart compares the year-on-year percentage change in the US$/„ exchange rate with a lag of six months to the Combined Results and Revision Score (with each sore being equally-weighted). The last eight turning points for the rate of change of the cross rate, have coincided with directional changes in earnings and revisions momentum. The recent weakness in the currency suggests a more stable market – at least until the late spring.Â
RECOMMENDATION – Although current valuations are attractive, we believe the market is correctly anticipating further declines in earnings momentum over the next few quarters. We would stay underweight Japanese equities by 20% (i.e. 5.5% v. 7%) with a bias towards domestic sectors, notably, Information Technology, Telecommunications, Media, Healthcare & Commercial Services. We would not hedge the currency.
The Ministry of Industry Affairs and Communications (MIC, the regulator) will allocate 2.2 GHz of new spectrum bandwidth by the end of March equal to 2.8x the existing spectrum base. This is not unexpected but we think this is a good opportunity to re-iterate some of the positive points on 5G spectrum as operators make their final applications this month and we wait for a final decision in six weeks. Importantly, with ten spectrum channels, not everyone will be treated equally although all should benefit. We expect Rakuten Inc (4755 JP)  to pick up one-two bands whilst KDDI Corp (9433 JP) , NTT Docomo Inc (9437 JP) and Softbank Corp (9434 JP)  should all receive at least two.
We remain constructive overall and continue to believe that global equities (MSCI ACWI) are going through a bottoming process. Opportunities exist but Sector leadership is mixed. In our February International Strategy document, we explore various themes which lead to our overall constructive outlook, as well as a technical appraisal of each Sector and the investable opportunities therein.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the worldâs leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
CHILLING – A winter chill has descended over the Japanese equity market. As we covered in our Insight on market aggregate earnings Japan: Winter Results & Revisions Flash the net income of corporate Japan peaked on 26th December, However, reported earnings are a lagging indicator, and in this instance, the ‘lag’ was almost one year, with the Total Market Capitalisation (excluding REITs) peaking on 23rd January 2018. Our preferred, and often leading, indicators are the All-Market Composite Results Score – a measure of the trend and momentum in quarterly corporate earnings the All-Market Composite Forecast/Revision Score – which measures the trend and rate of change in company initial forecasts and revisions. The Results Score peaked on 1st February 2018, seven trading days after the market peak and is now one year into an extended period of decline. The Forecast/Revision Score is slowing peaked out on 27th October 2017, three months ahead of the market and the Results Score – demonstrating the reliability of company forecasts, as opposed to ‘consensus’, as a leading indicator of future earnings. Revisions have continued to ‘lead’ on the way down and 0.55 points ‘ahead’. Â
Source: Japan Analytics
TURNING NEGATIVE? – Subtracting the Forecast/Revision Score from the Results Score shows the extent of the lag in the latter. The relationship has been relatively stable of over one year; however, as we ‘roll’ into the next fiscal year’s forecasts in May, we can expect the difference to move closer to zero as both scores turn negative. As the cycle bottoms out, the revisions will recover ahead of results, and the difference will also become negative, setting the stage for the next upswing in later 2019 or early 2020. Â
Source: Japan Analytics
On each of the three occasions since 2006 when the Results Score has fallen below ‘4’, it has subsequently fallen below zero. In 2012, the decline was muted by the advent of the Bank of Japan (BOJ)’s policy of weakening the currency. The current score of 2.14 suggests we are continuing on a path to zero and below. Failing a currency move through „115 (see below), the Results Score should turn negative by the time the full-year results are announced next May. We also expect a high degree of caution in forecasting, especially on the Auto sector which is overshadowed by the prospect of US tariffs. The announcement of the closer of Honda Motor (7267 JP)‘s car plant in Swindon in the UK is not a good portent. Â
Source: Japan Analytics
BEAR MARKET RALLY & THE YEN – Total Market Value has recovered by 13.8% since Christmas Day and is currently at the same level as when we published our Autumn review – SloMo Slowdown. With earnings and revisions heading lower, the implied expectation is for some or all of – a further central bank easing, a resolution of current trade tensions, and a weakening of the Yen. The last has been the ‘get-out-of-jail’ card for Japanese equities. Our chart compares the year-on-year percentage change in the US$/„ exchange rate with a lag of six months to the Combined Results and Revision Score (with each sore being equally-weighted). The last eight turning points for the rate of change of the cross rate, have coincided with directional changes in earnings and revisions momentum. The recent weakness in the currency suggests a more stable market – at least until the late spring.Â
RECOMMENDATION – Although current valuations are attractive, we believe the market is correctly anticipating further declines in earnings momentum over the next few quarters. We would stay underweight Japanese equities by 20% (i.e. 5.5% v. 7%) with a bias towards domestic sectors, notably, Information Technology, Telecommunications, Media, Healthcare & Commercial Services. We would not hedge the currency.
The Ministry of Industry Affairs and Communications (MIC, the regulator) will allocate 2.2 GHz of new spectrum bandwidth by the end of March equal to 2.8x the existing spectrum base. This is not unexpected but we think this is a good opportunity to re-iterate some of the positive points on 5G spectrum as operators make their final applications this month and we wait for a final decision in six weeks. Importantly, with ten spectrum channels, not everyone will be treated equally although all should benefit. We expect Rakuten Inc (4755 JP)  to pick up one-two bands whilst KDDI Corp (9433 JP) , NTT Docomo Inc (9437 JP) and Softbank Corp (9434 JP)  should all receive at least two.
We remain constructive overall and continue to believe that global equities (MSCI ACWI) are going through a bottoming process. Opportunities exist but Sector leadership is mixed. In our February International Strategy document, we explore various themes which lead to our overall constructive outlook, as well as a technical appraisal of each Sector and the investable opportunities therein.
Smartkarma supports the worldâs leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
The announcement of each round of QE increased asset prices, but the effect on Treasury bond prices began to fade when central bank purchases began. This unexpected behaviour revealed a little-known fact: asset prices react more to the expectation of changes in liquidity than to the experience of greater liquidity in financial markets. By contrast, economic growth is subject to the fluctuating standards of commercial bank lending, which follow variations in the demand for credit. Consequently, financial markets lead the economy. Meanwhile, central banks focus on lagging indicators, so theyâre followers, not leaders. Bond markets usually predict more accurately than stock markets. To work, central bank easing policies require real risk-adjusted interest rates. However, with those rates below zero in many countries, further reductions would penalise lenders without helping borrowers. Thus, only rising inflation can save stressed debtors.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the worldâs leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
On November 13th last year, Linkbal Inc (6046 JP) announced it was looking to move from MOTHERS to the TSE First Section. The stock rallied. At the same time the company said that it was preparing to file an application for the move.Â
On March 5th, the company announced a forthcoming tachiaigai bunbai offering designed to increase the float. That tachiaigai bunbai offering (designed for retail investors only) takes place this morning after an announcement the company would oversee the offer of 970,000 shares (about 5% of the company but about 180% of the float currently held by public retail investors) at a price of „905/share (1,000 shares max per buyer), which is a 3% discount to yesterday’s close of „933 yen.Â
This will get it most of the way towards meeting the requirements, but likely not all the way. An inclusion is still months off. And there would likely be another sale to increase shareholder count by 800-1000 before then, whether in the form of a Public Offering/Uridashi or in the form of another tachiaigai bunbai.
Resona Holdings (8308 JP) key tactical resistance lies at 503.86, a level that if broken could spur a counter trend tactical bounce back to outlined trendline and physical resistance.
The daily cycle does show some underlying tactical support given the RSI has not confirmed recent lows. Any rally would be a counter trend move within the larger degree decline cycle. Buy volumes are not supportive in this rise (deteriorating) underscore the macro bear posture.
If the weekly cycle head and shoulders is true to course, Resona Holdings would face significant downside pressure looking ahead 2 quarters.
Originally scheduled to close March 1st, near the end of February 2019, Bain Capital Japan’s acquisition vehicle (BCJ-34) extended the „610/share Tender Offer MBO deadline by 11 days from March 1st to March 11th. Of course, that was something of a moot point – by that time, the shares hadn’t traded at less than a 15% premium to terms for a week after well-known local activist Yoshiaki Murakami’s vehicle Reno KK and affiliates had taken a stake of just below 10%.Â
On the 8th of March, BCJ-34 raised its Tender Offer Price by 14.8% to „700/share and extended the Tender Offer by almost two weeks to the 25th of March. It also lowered the amount which needs to be bought to 50.1% from 66.67%. In that amended filing the buyer included words ăć ŹéèČ·ä»è ăŻăæŹéèČ·ä»æĄä»¶ăźć€æŽćŸăźæŹć ŹéèČ·ä»äŸĄæ Œăæç”çăȘăăźăšăăä»ćŸăæŹć ŹéèČ·ä»äŸĄæ Œăäžćć€æŽăăȘăăăšăźæ±șćźăăăŠăăăŸăăăwhich roughly translates to “The Offeror, having changed the terms, has made This Tender Offer Price final, and from this point onward, has decided to absolutely not raise the Tender Offer Price.”
That’s that, but since then, the shares have not traded as low as the newly raised Tender Offer Price.
With one week to go, Aoyama Fudosan yesterdat announced it had lifted its stake to 747,800 shares or 3.00% of shares out, which brings the combined Reno KK/Aoyama Fudosan stake to 11.71%.Â
Given the 1.1mm shares traded since the 11th (i.e. shares which if Murakami-san had bought he would not have to report until the 19th (today)) and that the share price was up sharply in decent volume this afternoon, it would not be difficult to imagine a higher stake being reported in the days ahead.
Murakami-san is not going away. This is starting to look a bit like another Murakami situation of recent. And that one turned out well.
On March 6th, a day before the Hitachi Ltd (6501 JP) Taiwan elevator business Tender Offer for just over a third of Yungtay Engineering (1507 TT) was expected to close, the closing date was extended to 22 April, notably because the acquiring entity had not yet received Taiwan Ministry of Economy Investment Commission approval for the foreign investment, and the Fair Trading Commission had not yet given the green light, so there was no hope of getting it done by the next day in accordance with Taiwan’s Public Acquisition of Public Company Shares Administrative Law Article 18 Para 2. The proposed purchase price was unchanged at NT$60.Â
While there have been noises in the market that both Otis and Schindler, which are reported to hold roughly 5-6% each (last year’s shareholder list included UT Park View which United Technologies (UTX US)‘s 10-K showed was a wholly-owned sub) were willing to offer more than Hitachi’s offered NT$60 (and MOPS filings indicate the board approval meeting in end-January referenced a NT$63 potential bid), there was no competitive bid made public and to the authorities by five business days prior to the first bid close (which would have been 26 Feb) as per the same law Article 7 Para 2.
Since then, there have also been other ructions. While terms remain unchanged, it is worthwhile looking into what has been going on. This is still interesting and because of its various inputs, slightly disconcerting to some, and the modalities continue to surprise me.
Smartkarma supports the worldâs leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
The announcement of each round of QE increased asset prices, but the effect on Treasury bond prices began to fade when central bank purchases began. This unexpected behaviour revealed a little-known fact: asset prices react more to the expectation of changes in liquidity than to the experience of greater liquidity in financial markets. By contrast, economic growth is subject to the fluctuating standards of commercial bank lending, which follow variations in the demand for credit. Consequently, financial markets lead the economy. Meanwhile, central banks focus on lagging indicators, so theyâre followers, not leaders. Bond markets usually predict more accurately than stock markets. To work, central bank easing policies require real risk-adjusted interest rates. However, with those rates below zero in many countries, further reductions would penalise lenders without helping borrowers. Thus, only rising inflation can save stressed debtors.
We have been struck by the degree of underperformance of the construction machinery names despite strong earnings performance. While the cyclical nature of the names makes judging performance purely on earnings results (or even the outlook) hazardous, in this case we believe the market has been premature and excessive in its derating of these stocks which have sold off to similar levels as the WFE names such as Tokyo Electron (8035 JP) Â and Robotics names such as Fanuc Corp (6954 JP).
While it is possible that Komatsu Ltd (6301 JP), Hitachi Construction Machinery (6305 JP) and Caterpillar Inc (CAT US) have sold off partly due to their China exposure, it needs to be emphasised that 1) these companies are no longer heavily dependent on China and revenue exposure is 12% for HCM, 10% for CAT and 7% for Komatsu, and 2) while the Chinese market at about 60k excavators is probably close to the top of its cycle, it is not a bubble like in 2010 when it 111k units and thus a collapse in demand is unlikely (though a decline is).
As the table below notes, earnings estimates for the construction machinery companies have only tapered marginally from their peaks, and while find the forecasts for continued growth into 2020 somewhat optimistic the resilience of mining demand means we are disinclined to dismiss them out of hand. On the other hand estimates for WFE and Robot names have dropped significantly, but despite this, share price performance is similar for all three categories of stocks. We discuss this stark discrepancy further below.
Change in 2019 OP Estimate Vs. Peak
Peak OP Estimate Date
Peak to Trough Share Price Change
Share Price Vs. Peak
Peak Share Price Date
Caterpillar
-6.4%
Aug 18
-35.2%
-21.4%
Jan 18
Komatsu
-2.1%
Dec 18
-49.7%
-38.8%
Jan 18
Hitachi Construction Machinery
-4.6%
Oct 18
-50.5%
-41.2%
Feb 18
Average
-4.4%
-45.1%
-33.8%
ASML
-10.1%
Jan 19
-31.2%
-14.4%
Jul 18
Applied Materials
-38.4%
Apr 18
-53.2%
-36.8%
Mar 18
LAM Research
-28.7%
Apr 18
-46.4%
-21.3%
Mar 18
Tokyo Electron
-36.6%
Jul 18
-49.9%
-32.4%
Nov 17
Average
-28.5%
-45.2%
-26.2%
Fanuc
-44.7%
Mar 18
-52.9%
-42.4%
Jan 18
Yaskawa
-34.7%
Mar 18
-58.5%
-47.0%
Jan 18
Harmonic Drive Systems
-43.2%
May 18
-65.9%
-49.3%
Jan 18
Average
-40.9%
-59.1%
-46.2%
Source: Bloomberg, LSR
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the worldâs leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
Established in 2013, this has been a huge success story in Japan. The company operates the largest C to C mobile app that allows customers to trade in second hand goods with each other. Growth has been phenomenal. In the year to 6/15, Mercari had revenue of Y4.2bn, three years later (6/18) this had risen to Y35.7bn. This growth carries on, first half revenue this year to December 2018 rose 45% to Y23.7bn. It has begun an operation in the US, currently loss making, and has just introduced âMerpayâ, a prepaid card incorporated into oneâs mobile phone along the lines of Suica that allows users to purchase goods and pay bills. Funds can be deposited following a sale on Mercariâs site or transferred from a bank. Revenue will probably continue to grow at a rapid pace and whilst there are some that will jump on board, it is impossible to come up with any sensible valuation that can really justify a purchase here. There is no p.e.r. and the company will be loss making for the next couple of years. Its market cap of Y440bn means that it is trading on perhaps 6x 6/20 sales. On top of this, there are risks with regards to the viability of its US operation. Management appear to be aware to this and have set certain time limits for a turn around. There are many BUYS out on this name, thematically it has much going for it, but the valuation leaves us cold.
In my original insight on January 15, 2019 TRADE IDEA: Amorepacific (002790 KS) Stub: A Beautiful Opportunity, I proposed setting up a stub trade to profit from the mis-priced stub business of Amorepacific that was trading at its widest discount to NAV in at least three years. During the 65 calendar days that followed, Amorepacific Group (002790 KS) has gained 7.3% and the outperformed Amorepacific Corp (090430 KS) by 2.84%. The trade has reverted to average levels in a period of about two months and in this insight I will outline why I think the trade is over.
I should have seen this coming. The asset is juicy enough, and they have a large enough stake, and the company is small enough, that this is an easy trade to do if you can get the funding. It makes eminent sense to be able to put the money down and go for it.Â
I have covered this minor disaster of an MBO (Management BuyOut) of Kosaido Co Ltd (7868 JP) since it was launched, with the original question of what one could do (other than refuse). Famed/notorious Japanese activist Yoshiaki Murakami and his associated companies started buying in and then the stock quickly cleared the Bain Capital Japan vehicle’s bid price. The deal was extended, then the Bain bid was raised to „700/share last week with the minimum threshold set at 50.01% not 66.67% but still the shares had not traded that low, and did not following the news. But Bain played chicken with Murakami and the market in its amended filing, including the words ăć ŹéèČ·ä»è ăŻăæŹéèČ·ä»æĄä»¶ăźć€æŽćŸăźæŹć ŹéèČ·ä»äŸĄæ Œăæç”çăȘăăźăšăăä»ćŸăæŹć ŹéèČ·ä»äŸĄæ Œăäžćć€æŽăăȘăăăšăźæ±șćźăăăŠăăăŸăăăwhich roughly translates to “The Offeror, having changed the terms, has made This Tender Offer Price final, and from this point onward, has decided to absolutely not raise the Tender Offer Price.”
So now Murakami-san has launched a Tender Offer of his own. Murakami-affiliated entities Minami Aoyama Fudosan KK and Reno KK have launched a Tender Offer at „750/share to buy a minimum of 9,100,900 shares and a maximum of all remaining shares. The entities currently own 3,355,900 shares (13.47%) between them – up from 11.71% reported up through yesterday [as noted in yesterday’s insight, it looked likely from the volume and trading patterns prior to yesterday’s Large Shareholder Report that they had continued buying].Â
Buying a minimum of 9,100,900 shares at „750/share should be easier for Murakami-san’s bidding entity than buying a minimum of 12,456,800 shares (Bain Capital’s minimum threshold) at „700/share, but the Murakami TOB Tender Agent is Mita Securities, which is a lesser-known agent and it is possible that the main agent for the Bain tender (SMBC Securities) could make life difficult for its account holders.
The likelihood that Murakami-san doesn’t have his bid funded or won’t follow through is, in my eyes, effectively zero. Tender Offer announcements are vetted by both the Kanto Local Finance Bureau and the Stock Exchange. You know this has been in the works for a couple of weeks simply because of that aspect. But one of the two documents released today includes an explanation of the process Murakami-san’s companies have gone through to arrive at this bid, and that tells you it may have gone on longer.
So what next? The easy answer is there is now a put at „750/share. Unless there is not. Weirder things have happened.
Read on…
For Recent Insights on the Kosaido Situation Published on Smartkarma…
New York based activist investor firm Starboard Value has been intricately involved in shaping the fortunes and futures of two high profile technology companies in recent years, Marvell and Mellanox. The firm first to prominence some five years ago when they were the first among their peers to accomplish the extraordinary feat of replacing the CEO and entire board of Fortune 500 restaurant group Darden, while holding less than 10% of the company’s shares.
In the wake of their Darden coup, the firm has gone from strength to strength. To date the firm has taken positions in a total of 105 publicly listed companies, replacing or adding some 211 directors on over 60 corporate boards.
On March 7’th 2019, Starboard Value announced the acquisition of a 4% stake in US comms infrastructure firm Zayo. In the intervening period, Zayo’s share price has risen by 14% as canny investors scramble to partake in the goodness that will surely be extracted by the activist firm that simply doesn’t take no for an answer.Â
Itochu planned on buying 7.21 million shares out of the 75.37mm shares which bear voting rights (as of the commencement of the Tender), and 15,115,148mm shares were tendered, which led to a pro-ration rate of 47.7% which was 0.3% below my the middle of my “wide range” expected pro-ration rate of 42-54% and 0.7% beyond the 44-47% tighter range discussed in Descente Descended and Itochu Angle Is More Hostile of 28 February.
Two more central ideas were discussed in that piece:
The hostility shown by Descente management during the Tender Offer had led Itochu to abandon discussions about post-tender management until after the Tender Offer was completed. Both sides indicated a willingness to pick up where things had left off – at Descente’s request – but Descente needed to stew a bit.
The revelation by ANTA Sports in an interview with the CEO in the Nikkei in late February that ANTA supported Itochu meant that the likelihood of Itochu NOT having enough votes to put through its own slate of directors was almost zero. At a combined 47.0% of post-Tender voting rights, if 94% or less of shares were to vote, it would mean Itochu could get the majority of over 50% and determine the entire slate of directors themselves. If there was another shareholder holding a couple of percent which supported Itochu, it would be a done deal even if everyone voted. And that 2-3% existed.
So… the threat that Itochu would hold an EGM to seat new directors to oblige a stronger course for management was a very strong probability. Management who was rabidly opposed to Itochu owning the stake could not very well bow down in front of Itochu post-tender just to save its own hide – not after the employee union and the OB group came out against. President Ishimoto had effectively put himself in an untenable position unless a miracle occurred because Itochu could not legally walk away from its offer, and Ishimoto-san was bad-mouthing Itochu even as they were negotiating during the Tender Offer Period.Â
It was not, therefore, any surprise that President Ishimoto would step down. The surprise for me was that the news he would go came out as talks commenced over the weekend (but did not “bridge the gap” as the Nikkei reported), before we got to the first business day post-results.Â
Talks apparently continue with no resolution, and the media reports offer no hint as to what the issues might be.Â
Recent Insights on the Descente/Wacoal and Itochu/Descente Situations on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the worldâs leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
We have been struck by the degree of underperformance of the construction machinery names despite strong earnings performance. While the cyclical nature of the names makes judging performance purely on earnings results (or even the outlook) hazardous, in this case we believe the market has been premature and excessive in its derating of these stocks which have sold off to similar levels as the WFE names such as Tokyo Electron (8035 JP) Â and Robotics names such as Fanuc Corp (6954 JP).
While it is possible that Komatsu Ltd (6301 JP), Hitachi Construction Machinery (6305 JP) and Caterpillar Inc (CAT US) have sold off partly due to their China exposure, it needs to be emphasised that 1) these companies are no longer heavily dependent on China and revenue exposure is 12% for HCM, 10% for CAT and 7% for Komatsu, and 2) while the Chinese market at about 60k excavators is probably close to the top of its cycle, it is not a bubble like in 2010 when it 111k units and thus a collapse in demand is unlikely (though a decline is).
As the table below notes, earnings estimates for the construction machinery companies have only tapered marginally from their peaks, and while find the forecasts for continued growth into 2020 somewhat optimistic the resilience of mining demand means we are disinclined to dismiss them out of hand. On the other hand estimates for WFE and Robot names have dropped significantly, but despite this, share price performance is similar for all three categories of stocks. We discuss this stark discrepancy further below.
Change in 2019 OP Estimate Vs. Peak
Peak OP Estimate Date
Peak to Trough Share Price Change
Share Price Vs. Peak
Peak Share Price Date
Caterpillar
-6.4%
Aug 18
-35.2%
-21.4%
Jan 18
Komatsu
-2.1%
Dec 18
-49.7%
-38.8%
Jan 18
Hitachi Construction Machinery
-4.6%
Oct 18
-50.5%
-41.2%
Feb 18
Average
-4.4%
-45.1%
-33.8%
ASML
-10.1%
Jan 19
-31.2%
-14.4%
Jul 18
Applied Materials
-38.4%
Apr 18
-53.2%
-36.8%
Mar 18
LAM Research
-28.7%
Apr 18
-46.4%
-21.3%
Mar 18
Tokyo Electron
-36.6%
Jul 18
-49.9%
-32.4%
Nov 17
Average
-28.5%
-45.2%
-26.2%
Fanuc
-44.7%
Mar 18
-52.9%
-42.4%
Jan 18
Yaskawa
-34.7%
Mar 18
-58.5%
-47.0%
Jan 18
Harmonic Drive Systems
-43.2%
May 18
-65.9%
-49.3%
Jan 18
Average
-40.9%
-59.1%
-46.2%
Source: Bloomberg, LSR
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the worldâs leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
In my original insight on January 15, 2019 TRADE IDEA: Amorepacific (002790 KS) Stub: A Beautiful Opportunity, I proposed setting up a stub trade to profit from the mis-priced stub business of Amorepacific that was trading at its widest discount to NAV in at least three years. During the 65 calendar days that followed, Amorepacific Group (002790 KS) has gained 7.3% and the outperformed Amorepacific Corp (090430 KS) by 2.84%. The trade has reverted to average levels in a period of about two months and in this insight I will outline why I think the trade is over.
I should have seen this coming. The asset is juicy enough, and they have a large enough stake, and the company is small enough, that this is an easy trade to do if you can get the funding. It makes eminent sense to be able to put the money down and go for it.Â
I have covered this minor disaster of an MBO (Management BuyOut) of Kosaido Co Ltd (7868 JP) since it was launched, with the original question of what one could do (other than refuse). Famed/notorious Japanese activist Yoshiaki Murakami and his associated companies started buying in and then the stock quickly cleared the Bain Capital Japan vehicle’s bid price. The deal was extended, then the Bain bid was raised to „700/share last week with the minimum threshold set at 50.01% not 66.67% but still the shares had not traded that low, and did not following the news. But Bain played chicken with Murakami and the market in its amended filing, including the words ăć ŹéèČ·ä»è ăŻăæŹéèČ·ä»æĄä»¶ăźć€æŽćŸăźæŹć ŹéèČ·ä»äŸĄæ Œăæç”çăȘăăźăšăăä»ćŸăæŹć ŹéèČ·ä»äŸĄæ Œăäžćć€æŽăăȘăăăšăźæ±șćźăăăŠăăăŸăăăwhich roughly translates to “The Offeror, having changed the terms, has made This Tender Offer Price final, and from this point onward, has decided to absolutely not raise the Tender Offer Price.”
So now Murakami-san has launched a Tender Offer of his own. Murakami-affiliated entities Minami Aoyama Fudosan KK and Reno KK have launched a Tender Offer at „750/share to buy a minimum of 9,100,900 shares and a maximum of all remaining shares. The entities currently own 3,355,900 shares (13.47%) between them – up from 11.71% reported up through yesterday [as noted in yesterday’s insight, it looked likely from the volume and trading patterns prior to yesterday’s Large Shareholder Report that they had continued buying].Â
Buying a minimum of 9,100,900 shares at „750/share should be easier for Murakami-san’s bidding entity than buying a minimum of 12,456,800 shares (Bain Capital’s minimum threshold) at „700/share, but the Murakami TOB Tender Agent is Mita Securities, which is a lesser-known agent and it is possible that the main agent for the Bain tender (SMBC Securities) could make life difficult for its account holders.
The likelihood that Murakami-san doesn’t have his bid funded or won’t follow through is, in my eyes, effectively zero. Tender Offer announcements are vetted by both the Kanto Local Finance Bureau and the Stock Exchange. You know this has been in the works for a couple of weeks simply because of that aspect. But one of the two documents released today includes an explanation of the process Murakami-san’s companies have gone through to arrive at this bid, and that tells you it may have gone on longer.
So what next? The easy answer is there is now a put at „750/share. Unless there is not. Weirder things have happened.
Read on…
For Recent Insights on the Kosaido Situation Published on Smartkarma…
New York based activist investor firm Starboard Value has been intricately involved in shaping the fortunes and futures of two high profile technology companies in recent years, Marvell and Mellanox. The firm first to prominence some five years ago when they were the first among their peers to accomplish the extraordinary feat of replacing the CEO and entire board of Fortune 500 restaurant group Darden, while holding less than 10% of the company’s shares.
In the wake of their Darden coup, the firm has gone from strength to strength. To date the firm has taken positions in a total of 105 publicly listed companies, replacing or adding some 211 directors on over 60 corporate boards.
On March 7’th 2019, Starboard Value announced the acquisition of a 4% stake in US comms infrastructure firm Zayo. In the intervening period, Zayo’s share price has risen by 14% as canny investors scramble to partake in the goodness that will surely be extracted by the activist firm that simply doesn’t take no for an answer.Â
Itochu planned on buying 7.21 million shares out of the 75.37mm shares which bear voting rights (as of the commencement of the Tender), and 15,115,148mm shares were tendered, which led to a pro-ration rate of 47.7% which was 0.3% below my the middle of my “wide range” expected pro-ration rate of 42-54% and 0.7% beyond the 44-47% tighter range discussed in Descente Descended and Itochu Angle Is More Hostile of 28 February.
Two more central ideas were discussed in that piece:
The hostility shown by Descente management during the Tender Offer had led Itochu to abandon discussions about post-tender management until after the Tender Offer was completed. Both sides indicated a willingness to pick up where things had left off – at Descente’s request – but Descente needed to stew a bit.
The revelation by ANTA Sports in an interview with the CEO in the Nikkei in late February that ANTA supported Itochu meant that the likelihood of Itochu NOT having enough votes to put through its own slate of directors was almost zero. At a combined 47.0% of post-Tender voting rights, if 94% or less of shares were to vote, it would mean Itochu could get the majority of over 50% and determine the entire slate of directors themselves. If there was another shareholder holding a couple of percent which supported Itochu, it would be a done deal even if everyone voted. And that 2-3% existed.
So… the threat that Itochu would hold an EGM to seat new directors to oblige a stronger course for management was a very strong probability. Management who was rabidly opposed to Itochu owning the stake could not very well bow down in front of Itochu post-tender just to save its own hide – not after the employee union and the OB group came out against. President Ishimoto had effectively put himself in an untenable position unless a miracle occurred because Itochu could not legally walk away from its offer, and Ishimoto-san was bad-mouthing Itochu even as they were negotiating during the Tender Offer Period.Â
It was not, therefore, any surprise that President Ishimoto would step down. The surprise for me was that the news he would go came out as talks commenced over the weekend (but did not “bridge the gap” as the Nikkei reported), before we got to the first business day post-results.Â
Talks apparently continue with no resolution, and the media reports offer no hint as to what the issues might be.Â
Recent Insights on the Descente/Wacoal and Itochu/Descente Situations on Smartkarma
On November 13th last year, Linkbal Inc (6046 JP) announced it was looking to move from MOTHERS to the TSE First Section. The stock rallied. At the same time the company said that it was preparing to file an application for the move.Â
On March 5th, the company announced a forthcoming tachiaigai bunbai offering designed to increase the float. That tachiaigai bunbai offering (designed for retail investors only) takes place this morning after an announcement the company would oversee the offer of 970,000 shares (about 5% of the company but about 180% of the float currently held by public retail investors) at a price of „905/share (1,000 shares max per buyer), which is a 3% discount to yesterday’s close of „933 yen.Â
This will get it most of the way towards meeting the requirements, but likely not all the way. An inclusion is still months off. And there would likely be another sale to increase shareholder count by 800-1000 before then, whether in the form of a Public Offering/Uridashi or in the form of another tachiaigai bunbai.
Smartkarma supports the worldâs leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.