This week in North Asia the Smartkarma team Insights were more Bearish than Bullish.Â
Close Outs or Sales were recommended on: Kosaido (7868 JP), the Amorepacific Group/Corp pair, the Hyosung TNC/Corp pair, Resona Holdings (8308 JP) and the Japanese market overall.
The Hyundai Autoever IPO was covered by two providers as was the Woori Group all with Bullish flags.
The upcoming KOSPI 200 re balancing was also covered with a list of potential additions and deletions. Â
 – NORTH ASIAN INSIGHT OF THE WEEK –Â
Our Top Insight of the week was Douglas Kim ‘s interesting note on Korean companies pulling out of China or restructuring their operations in that country.Â
As Douglas notes, “The pace of major Korean companies that are discontinuing part or all of their operations in China in the past year has been UNPRECEDENTED in the past two decades. This trend is very concerning since it suggests deteriorating business conditions and reduced employment in China”.Â
The main reason why the Korean companies are pulling out of China is primarily due to the difficulty of generating profits under the current, difficult operating conditions.
However, the reasons why it has become more difficult for these Korean companies to generate profits in China is more complex. The difficult operating environment is a combination of:Â –
lower Chinese consumer demand for products such as smartphones, autos, cosmetics, and other consumer goods
many of the Korean companies’ products have become less competitive as compared to the products made by the Chinese companies, and.Â
additional regulatory pressures that are placed on these Korean companies operating in China have contributed towards the difficult operating environment
FIVE-MONTH HIGH – This bear market rally is now ending. The market composite rose by 15% from the Christmas Day low, peaking on 26th February at Â¥659t. The market-value-based percentage above moving averages reached a five-month on Friday. However, the three-month change in that percentage is suggesting that a new bear phase will now commence.
Source: Japan Analytics
SELL SIGNAL – The three-month change in the market-value-based percentage above moving averages reached 38 on Friday. Although this indicator is not always reliable as a long-term indicator, it has been helpful over shorter periods and has called the most recent peak in October and December’s trough. We now expect at least a decline in the market composite to below Â¥600t and, if economic conditions continue to weaken, a re-test of the December low.Â
– SECTORS –Â
NB: The ‘sparklines’ show the three-year trend in the weighted percentage above moving average relative to the Market Composite and the ‘STDev’ column is a measure of the variability of that relative measure. The table also provides averages for the breaks above and breaks below and the positive and negative crossovers.
SECTOR BREAKDOWN – The top six sectors remain mostly domestic and defensive. REITs,Restaurants, Healthcare, Transportation, and Utilities continue from our previous review with Other Commercial Products replacing Information Technology. Equally predictable is the bottom half-dozen – Banks, Non-Bank Finance, Autos, Retail, and Metals remain from two weeks ago, with Energy replacing Construction. With the Yen having broken the Â¥110 level against the US dollar on Friday, we would expect the Autos, Machinery, Electrical Equipment, Technology Hardware, and Chemicals sectors to weaken further as indicated by their Negative Crossover percentages.Â
– COMPANIES –
COMPANY MOVING AVERAGE OUTLIERS – As with the Market Composite and Sectors, the Moving Average Outlier indicator uses a weighted sum of each company’s share price relative to its 5-day, 20-day, 60-day, 120-day and 240-day moving averages. ‘Extreme’ values are weighted sums greater than 100% and less than -100%. We would caution that this indicator is best used for timing shorter-term reversals and, in many cases, higher highs and lower lows will be seen.Â
In the DETAIL section below, we highlight the current top and bottom twenty-five large capitalisation outliers, as well as those companies that have seen the most significant positive and negative changes in their outlier percentage in the last two weeks and provide short comments on companies of particular note.
Our most extreme positive outlier two weeks ago, AnGes (4563 JP) is still the most extreme large cap positive outlier and gained a further 8% over the fortnight. We recommend taking short-term profits.
In the same sector Eisai (4523 JP) is the most extreme negative outlier after falling by 16.6% on Friday on the discontinuation of the clinical phase 3 trials of Biogen’s Alzheimer’s treatment Aducanumab as the primary endpoint is unlikely to be reached. Now at an eight-month Relative Price Score low, a short-term recovery to above Â¥8,000 is likely.
On Monday the 18th of March, Yoshiaki Murakami-associated companies announced they had raised their stake in Kosaido Co Ltd (7868 JP) above 10%. That stake raise happened at a price ABOVE where Bain Capital Japan’s bidding entity had set its “final” Tender Offer Price of Â¥700/share beforehand, indicating there was no way Murakami-associated companies would accept Bain’s price.
On the 20th, Minami Aoyama Fudosan – another Murakami-associated company heretofore uninvolved – announced a Tender Offer for a minimum of 50.00% of Kosaido (and up to 100% of the shares out) at ¥750/share (and announced they had bought more bringing their stake to 13.47% in total).Â
The shares reacted strongly Friday the 22nd after a market holiday Thursday, rising 16.6% to close 14.5% through the Murakami-fund terms.Â
After the close on Friday, the Murakami-affiliated company Reno KK which has been the lead entity to date in the effort – announced a larger position (as I noted on the 19th was likely). Also after the close, Kosaido itself made three public releases.
It is worth reading them, and it is worth thinking about what the company’s options are.
For Recent Insights on the Kosaido Situation Published on Smartkarma…
This was the basis of the trade. Hitachi Ltd (6501 JP) has been susceptible to pressure for a bump since even before the Tender Offer was announced because of the proxy fight at last year’s board meeting for management rights. Hitachi supported the incumbent who consequently retired as chairman, but kept the continuity. The board was split 6:3.Â
Since late January or early February when it became clear that board support for the deal was still split 6:3 and one of the points in a couple of the independent directors’ comments as reasons why the deal was not supported was that Hitachi’s bid at NT$60/share did not match an informal offer from Otis at $63/share, it has been clear that one way to extinguish that criticism was to bid NT$63 or higher.Â
And now Hitachi has. After the close on Friday, a release from Yungtay Engineering (1507 TT) hit the mops system saying that Hitachi had amended the Public Purchase statement by raising the Purchase Price to NT$65/share. This is closer to the high end of the original valuations provided by the law firm and public accountancy firms of NT$40.27-68.31 and NT$55.15-67.83. Taiwan Hitachi Elevator released a press release carried by the ChinaTimes here.
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
NextDecade Corp (NEXT US) recently announced that it started offering long-term contracts indexed to the crude Brent in order to attract more LNG buyers. This follows the agreement reached by Tellurian Inc (TELL US) with Vitol back in December to index a long term contract with the Asian LNG price benchmark JKM. While typically US LNG projects are indexed to the Henry Hub, declining crude oil and LNG prices seem to have diminished the appeal of the Henry Hub pricing compared to the oil indexation. This insight takes a look at the latest trends in the LNG markets to assess which companies are taking the lead in the race to bring to FID in 2019 their proposed LNG projects.
Exhibit 1: NextDecade adds Brent indexation to its commercial offering
Source: NextDecade Corporate Presentation February 2019
Â
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
NextDecade Corp (NEXT US) recently announced that it started offering long-term contracts indexed to the crude Brent in order to attract more LNG buyers. This follows the agreement reached by Tellurian Inc (TELL US) with Vitol back in December to index a long term contract with the Asian LNG price benchmark JKM. While typically US LNG projects are indexed to the Henry Hub, declining crude oil and LNG prices seem to have diminished the appeal of the Henry Hub pricing compared to the oil indexation. This insight takes a look at the latest trends in the LNG markets to assess which companies are taking the lead in the race to bring to FID in 2019 their proposed LNG projects.
Exhibit 1: NextDecade adds Brent indexation to its commercial offering
Source: NextDecade Corporate Presentation February 2019
INTRODUCTION – Following on from our review of the Market Composite and Sectors, this Insight will cover the cap-weighted Results & Revision Scores for the 328 Peer Groups that comprise our 30 Sectors providing greater depth to our analysis of current business trends. Peer Group definitions reflect both standard SIC/GICS classifications as well as local market conventions. The number of constituents and market capitalisation for each Peer Group varies widely.Â
RRS/RPS SCORE MATRIX – Combining our Results & Revision Scores (RRS) with each Peer Group’s Relative Price Score (RPS) allows a classification of our Peer Group universe into four quadrants –
‘Contrarian Buy‘Â > Low RRS & Low RPSÂ
‘Contrarian Sell’ > High RRS & High RPS
Peak Growth‘ > High RRS & Low RPS
‘Ex-Growth/Turnaround‘ > Low RRS & High RPS
THE ‘QUADRANTS’ – In the two ‘Contrarian‘ quadrants, the market is aligned with the current earnings momentum of the Peer Groups suggesting opportunities exist only for those willing or brave enough to take a contrarian view. For ‘Peak Growth‘ Peer Groups, the market is calling for a downturn in momentum that has yet to be reflected in quarterly earnings. Where the cycle is more prolonged than expected, there are often opportunities for short-term rebounds in what are normally relatively-inexpensive companies. The ‘Ex-Growth‘ quadrant often consists of former ‘Contrarian Sell‘s where the market is reluctant to acknowledge that the cycle has turned. This quadrant can also contain ‘Turnarounds‘ – formerly ‘Contrarian Buys‘ where the market is correctly anticipating a change in fortunes.  Â
In the DETAIL section below, we list the top and bottom twenty Peer Groups ranked by Results & Revision Score and the top and bottom twenty most-changed over the last three months as well the most optimistic and most pessimistic. In our ranked tables we have listed only those Peer Groups with an aggregate capitalisation of over Â¥50b.Â
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
NextDecade Corp (NEXT US) recently announced that it started offering long-term contracts indexed to the crude Brent in order to attract more LNG buyers. This follows the agreement reached by Tellurian Inc (TELL US) with Vitol back in December to index a long term contract with the Asian LNG price benchmark JKM. While typically US LNG projects are indexed to the Henry Hub, declining crude oil and LNG prices seem to have diminished the appeal of the Henry Hub pricing compared to the oil indexation. This insight takes a look at the latest trends in the LNG markets to assess which companies are taking the lead in the race to bring to FID in 2019 their proposed LNG projects.
Exhibit 1: NextDecade adds Brent indexation to its commercial offering
Source: NextDecade Corporate Presentation February 2019
INTRODUCTION – Following on from our review of the Market Composite and Sectors, this Insight will cover the cap-weighted Results & Revision Scores for the 328 Peer Groups that comprise our 30 Sectors providing greater depth to our analysis of current business trends. Peer Group definitions reflect both standard SIC/GICS classifications as well as local market conventions. The number of constituents and market capitalisation for each Peer Group varies widely.Â
RRS/RPS SCORE MATRIX – Combining our Results & Revision Scores (RRS) with each Peer Group’s Relative Price Score (RPS) allows a classification of our Peer Group universe into four quadrants –
‘Contrarian Buy‘Â > Low RRS & Low RPSÂ
‘Contrarian Sell’ > High RRS & High RPS
Peak Growth‘ > High RRS & Low RPS
‘Ex-Growth/Turnaround‘ > Low RRS & High RPS
THE ‘QUADRANTS’ – In the two ‘Contrarian‘ quadrants, the market is aligned with the current earnings momentum of the Peer Groups suggesting opportunities exist only for those willing or brave enough to take a contrarian view. For ‘Peak Growth‘ Peer Groups, the market is calling for a downturn in momentum that has yet to be reflected in quarterly earnings. Where the cycle is more prolonged than expected, there are often opportunities for short-term rebounds in what are normally relatively-inexpensive companies. The ‘Ex-Growth‘ quadrant often consists of former ‘Contrarian Sell‘s where the market is reluctant to acknowledge that the cycle has turned. This quadrant can also contain ‘Turnarounds‘ – formerly ‘Contrarian Buys‘ where the market is correctly anticipating a change in fortunes.  Â
In the DETAIL section below, we list the top and bottom twenty Peer Groups ranked by Results & Revision Score and the top and bottom twenty most-changed over the last three months as well the most optimistic and most pessimistic. In our ranked tables we have listed only those Peer Groups with an aggregate capitalisation of over Â¥50b.Â
Government plans to manage the effects of the consumption tax increase of 2% to 10%, due in October, continue to develop.
As in 2014 when sales tax rose from 5% to 8%, companies are nervous that the increase will lead to a significant downturn in consumption, and the government is chafing under pressure, both from businesses and the opposition.
The latest idea is to pump more money into the economy, while at the same time insisting that Japan’s massive debt levels will fall, partly thanks to stimulus from Japan’s new free trade deal with the EU and its role in the TPP.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
This week in North Asia the Smartkarma team Insights were more Bearish than Bullish.Â
Close Outs or Sales were recommended on: Kosaido (7868 JP), the Amorepacific Group/Corp pair, the Hyosung TNC/Corp pair, Resona Holdings (8308 JP) and the Japanese market overall.
The Hyundai Autoever IPO was covered by two providers as was the Woori Group all with Bullish flags.
The upcoming KOSPI 200 re balancing was also covered with a list of potential additions and deletions. Â
 – NORTH ASIAN INSIGHT OF THE WEEK –Â
Our Top Insight of the week was Douglas Kim ‘s interesting note on Korean companies pulling out of China or restructuring their operations in that country.Â
As Douglas notes, “The pace of major Korean companies that are discontinuing part or all of their operations in China in the past year has been UNPRECEDENTED in the past two decades. This trend is very concerning since it suggests deteriorating business conditions and reduced employment in China”.Â
The main reason why the Korean companies are pulling out of China is primarily due to the difficulty of generating profits under the current, difficult operating conditions.
However, the reasons why it has become more difficult for these Korean companies to generate profits in China is more complex. The difficult operating environment is a combination of:Â –
lower Chinese consumer demand for products such as smartphones, autos, cosmetics, and other consumer goods
many of the Korean companies’ products have become less competitive as compared to the products made by the Chinese companies, and.Â
additional regulatory pressures that are placed on these Korean companies operating in China have contributed towards the difficult operating environment
FIVE-MONTH HIGH – This bear market rally is now ending. The market composite rose by 15% from the Christmas Day low, peaking on 26th February at Â¥659t. The market-value-based percentage above moving averages reached a five-month on Friday. However, the three-month change in that percentage is suggesting that a new bear phase will now commence.
Source: Japan Analytics
SELL SIGNAL – The three-month change in the market-value-based percentage above moving averages reached 38 on Friday. Although this indicator is not always reliable as a long-term indicator, it has been helpful over shorter periods and has called the most recent peak in October and December’s trough. We now expect at least a decline in the market composite to below Â¥600t and, if economic conditions continue to weaken, a re-test of the December low.Â
– SECTORS –Â
NB: The ‘sparklines’ show the three-year trend in the weighted percentage above moving average relative to the Market Composite and the ‘STDev’ column is a measure of the variability of that relative measure. The table also provides averages for the breaks above and breaks below and the positive and negative crossovers.
SECTOR BREAKDOWN – The top six sectors remain mostly domestic and defensive. REITs,Restaurants, Healthcare, Transportation, and Utilities continue from our previous review with Other Commercial Products replacing Information Technology. Equally predictable is the bottom half-dozen – Banks, Non-Bank Finance, Autos, Retail, and Metals remain from two weeks ago, with Energy replacing Construction. With the Yen having broken the Â¥110 level against the US dollar on Friday, we would expect the Autos, Machinery, Electrical Equipment, Technology Hardware, and Chemicals sectors to weaken further as indicated by their Negative Crossover percentages.Â
– COMPANIES –
COMPANY MOVING AVERAGE OUTLIERS – As with the Market Composite and Sectors, the Moving Average Outlier indicator uses a weighted sum of each company’s share price relative to its 5-day, 20-day, 60-day, 120-day and 240-day moving averages. ‘Extreme’ values are weighted sums greater than 100% and less than -100%. We would caution that this indicator is best used for timing shorter-term reversals and, in many cases, higher highs and lower lows will be seen.Â
In the DETAIL section below, we highlight the current top and bottom twenty-five large capitalisation outliers, as well as those companies that have seen the most significant positive and negative changes in their outlier percentage in the last two weeks and provide short comments on companies of particular note.
Our most extreme positive outlier two weeks ago, AnGes (4563 JP) is still the most extreme large cap positive outlier and gained a further 8% over the fortnight. We recommend taking short-term profits.
In the same sector Eisai (4523 JP) is the most extreme negative outlier after falling by 16.6% on Friday on the discontinuation of the clinical phase 3 trials of Biogen’s Alzheimer’s treatment Aducanumab as the primary endpoint is unlikely to be reached. Now at an eight-month Relative Price Score low, a short-term recovery to above Â¥8,000 is likely.
On Monday the 18th of March, Yoshiaki Murakami-associated companies announced they had raised their stake in Kosaido Co Ltd (7868 JP) above 10%. That stake raise happened at a price ABOVE where Bain Capital Japan’s bidding entity had set its “final” Tender Offer Price of Â¥700/share beforehand, indicating there was no way Murakami-associated companies would accept Bain’s price.
On the 20th, Minami Aoyama Fudosan – another Murakami-associated company heretofore uninvolved – announced a Tender Offer for a minimum of 50.00% of Kosaido (and up to 100% of the shares out) at ¥750/share (and announced they had bought more bringing their stake to 13.47% in total).Â
The shares reacted strongly Friday the 22nd after a market holiday Thursday, rising 16.6% to close 14.5% through the Murakami-fund terms.Â
After the close on Friday, the Murakami-affiliated company Reno KK which has been the lead entity to date in the effort – announced a larger position (as I noted on the 19th was likely). Also after the close, Kosaido itself made three public releases.
It is worth reading them, and it is worth thinking about what the company’s options are.
For Recent Insights on the Kosaido Situation Published on Smartkarma…
This was the basis of the trade. Hitachi Ltd (6501 JP) has been susceptible to pressure for a bump since even before the Tender Offer was announced because of the proxy fight at last year’s board meeting for management rights. Hitachi supported the incumbent who consequently retired as chairman, but kept the continuity. The board was split 6:3.Â
Since late January or early February when it became clear that board support for the deal was still split 6:3 and one of the points in a couple of the independent directors’ comments as reasons why the deal was not supported was that Hitachi’s bid at NT$60/share did not match an informal offer from Otis at $63/share, it has been clear that one way to extinguish that criticism was to bid NT$63 or higher.Â
And now Hitachi has. After the close on Friday, a release from Yungtay Engineering (1507 TT) hit the mops system saying that Hitachi had amended the Public Purchase statement by raising the Purchase Price to NT$65/share. This is closer to the high end of the original valuations provided by the law firm and public accountancy firms of NT$40.27-68.31 and NT$55.15-67.83. Taiwan Hitachi Elevator released a press release carried by the ChinaTimes here.
Consumer electronics retailers have struggled since 2014, with 2018 proving a rare respite from decline as sales remained flat.
The consumption tax increase in October, along with some other factors, means the market is expected to grow this year, but it could be a while before that happens again.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
INTRODUCTION – Following on from our review of the Market Composite and Sectors, this Insight will cover the cap-weighted Results & Revision Scores for the 328 Peer Groups that comprise our 30 Sectors providing greater depth to our analysis of current business trends. Peer Group definitions reflect both standard SIC/GICS classifications as well as local market conventions. The number of constituents and market capitalisation for each Peer Group varies widely.Â
RRS/RPS SCORE MATRIX – Combining our Results & Revision Scores (RRS) with each Peer Group’s Relative Price Score (RPS) allows a classification of our Peer Group universe into four quadrants –
‘Contrarian Buy‘Â > Low RRS & Low RPSÂ
‘Contrarian Sell’ > High RRS & High RPS
Peak Growth‘ > High RRS & Low RPS
‘Ex-Growth/Turnaround‘ > Low RRS & High RPS
THE ‘QUADRANTS’ – In the two ‘Contrarian‘ quadrants, the market is aligned with the current earnings momentum of the Peer Groups suggesting opportunities exist only for those willing or brave enough to take a contrarian view. For ‘Peak Growth‘ Peer Groups, the market is calling for a downturn in momentum that has yet to be reflected in quarterly earnings. Where the cycle is more prolonged than expected, there are often opportunities for short-term rebounds in what are normally relatively-inexpensive companies. The ‘Ex-Growth‘ quadrant often consists of former ‘Contrarian Sell‘s where the market is reluctant to acknowledge that the cycle has turned. This quadrant can also contain ‘Turnarounds‘ – formerly ‘Contrarian Buys‘ where the market is correctly anticipating a change in fortunes.  Â
In the DETAIL section below, we list the top and bottom twenty Peer Groups ranked by Results & Revision Score and the top and bottom twenty most-changed over the last three months as well the most optimistic and most pessimistic. In our ranked tables we have listed only those Peer Groups with an aggregate capitalisation of over Â¥50b.Â
Government plans to manage the effects of the consumption tax increase of 2% to 10%, due in October, continue to develop.
As in 2014 when sales tax rose from 5% to 8%, companies are nervous that the increase will lead to a significant downturn in consumption, and the government is chafing under pressure, both from businesses and the opposition.
The latest idea is to pump more money into the economy, while at the same time insisting that Japan’s massive debt levels will fall, partly thanks to stimulus from Japan’s new free trade deal with the EU and its role in the TPP.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
FIVE-MONTH HIGH – This bear market rally is now ending. The market composite rose by 15% from the Christmas Day low, peaking on 26th February at Â¥659t. The market-value-based percentage above moving averages reached a five-month on Friday. However, the three-month change in that percentage is suggesting that a new bear phase will now commence.
Source: Japan Analytics
SELL SIGNAL – The three-month change in the market-value-based percentage above moving averages reached 38 on Friday. Although this indicator is not always reliable as a long-term indicator, it has been helpful over shorter periods and has called the most recent peak in October and December’s trough. We now expect at least a decline in the market composite to below Â¥600t and, if economic conditions continue to weaken, a re-test of the December low.Â
– SECTORS –Â
NB: The ‘sparklines’ show the three-year trend in the weighted percentage above moving average relative to the Market Composite and the ‘STDev’ column is a measure of the variability of that relative measure. The table also provides averages for the breaks above and breaks below and the positive and negative crossovers.
SECTOR BREAKDOWN – The top six sectors remain mostly domestic and defensive. REITs,Restaurants, Healthcare, Transportation, and Utilities continue from our previous review with Other Commercial Products replacing Information Technology. Equally predictable is the bottom half-dozen – Banks, Non-Bank Finance, Autos, Retail, and Metals remain from two weeks ago, with Energy replacing Construction. With the Yen having broken the Â¥110 level against the US dollar on Friday, we would expect the Autos, Machinery, Electrical Equipment, Technology Hardware, and Chemicals sectors to weaken further as indicated by their Negative Crossover percentages.Â
– COMPANIES –
COMPANY MOVING AVERAGE OUTLIERS – As with the Market Composite and Sectors, the Moving Average Outlier indicator uses a weighted sum of each company’s share price relative to its 5-day, 20-day, 60-day, 120-day and 240-day moving averages. ‘Extreme’ values are weighted sums greater than 100% and less than -100%. We would caution that this indicator is best used for timing shorter-term reversals and, in many cases, higher highs and lower lows will be seen.Â
In the DETAIL section below, we highlight the current top and bottom twenty-five large capitalisation outliers, as well as those companies that have seen the most significant positive and negative changes in their outlier percentage in the last two weeks and provide short comments on companies of particular note.
Our most extreme positive outlier two weeks ago, AnGes (4563 JP) is still the most extreme large cap positive outlier and gained a further 8% over the fortnight. We recommend taking short-term profits.
In the same sector Eisai (4523 JP) is the most extreme negative outlier after falling by 16.6% on Friday on the discontinuation of the clinical phase 3 trials of Biogen’s Alzheimer’s treatment Aducanumab as the primary endpoint is unlikely to be reached. Now at an eight-month Relative Price Score low, a short-term recovery to above Â¥8,000 is likely.
On Monday the 18th of March, Yoshiaki Murakami-associated companies announced they had raised their stake in Kosaido Co Ltd (7868 JP) above 10%. That stake raise happened at a price ABOVE where Bain Capital Japan’s bidding entity had set its “final” Tender Offer Price of Â¥700/share beforehand, indicating there was no way Murakami-associated companies would accept Bain’s price.
On the 20th, Minami Aoyama Fudosan – another Murakami-associated company heretofore uninvolved – announced a Tender Offer for a minimum of 50.00% of Kosaido (and up to 100% of the shares out) at ¥750/share (and announced they had bought more bringing their stake to 13.47% in total).Â
The shares reacted strongly Friday the 22nd after a market holiday Thursday, rising 16.6% to close 14.5% through the Murakami-fund terms.Â
After the close on Friday, the Murakami-affiliated company Reno KK which has been the lead entity to date in the effort – announced a larger position (as I noted on the 19th was likely). Also after the close, Kosaido itself made three public releases.
It is worth reading them, and it is worth thinking about what the company’s options are.
For Recent Insights on the Kosaido Situation Published on Smartkarma…
This was the basis of the trade. Hitachi Ltd (6501 JP) has been susceptible to pressure for a bump since even before the Tender Offer was announced because of the proxy fight at last year’s board meeting for management rights. Hitachi supported the incumbent who consequently retired as chairman, but kept the continuity. The board was split 6:3.Â
Since late January or early February when it became clear that board support for the deal was still split 6:3 and one of the points in a couple of the independent directors’ comments as reasons why the deal was not supported was that Hitachi’s bid at NT$60/share did not match an informal offer from Otis at $63/share, it has been clear that one way to extinguish that criticism was to bid NT$63 or higher.Â
And now Hitachi has. After the close on Friday, a release from Yungtay Engineering (1507 TT) hit the mops system saying that Hitachi had amended the Public Purchase statement by raising the Purchase Price to NT$65/share. This is closer to the high end of the original valuations provided by the law firm and public accountancy firms of NT$40.27-68.31 and NT$55.15-67.83. Taiwan Hitachi Elevator released a press release carried by the ChinaTimes here.
Consumer electronics retailers have struggled since 2014, with 2018 proving a rare respite from decline as sales remained flat.
The consumption tax increase in October, along with some other factors, means the market is expected to grow this year, but it could be a while before that happens again.
Lasertec hit a new high in the semiconductor stock rally that followed Micron Technology’s March 20 earnings call. On Friday, March 22 (March 21 was a holiday in Japan), Lasertec was up 8.4% to ¥4,900. At this price, the shares are selling at 42x our EPS estimate for FY Jun-19, 36x our estimate for FY Jun-20 and 31x our estimate for FY Jun-21. On a 5-year view, earnings growth could bring the projected P/E multiple down to 21x, in our estimation.
Following strong 1H results, management left FY Jun-19 sales and profit guidance unchanged, but raised semiconductor-related orders guidance by 13% while cutting  orders guidance for FPD-related and other products by nearly 40%. Total new orders guidance was raised from ¥37 billion to ¥39 billion, compared with sales guidance of ¥28 billion, implying an increase in the order backlog from ¥39.9 billion to ¥50.9 billion.
With this in mind, we have raised our sales and profit estimates for FY Jun-20 and added new, higher estimates for FY Jun-21 and beyond. Rising demand for EUV mask blank and mask defect inspection equipment should drive an increase in total sales from ¥29 billion this fiscal year to ¥38 billion in FY Jun-21, and approximately ¥50 billion in FY Jun-23. Over the same period, operating profit should rise from ¥7.0 billion to ¥9.5 billion, and then to approximately ¥14 billion.
Risks for investors include the potential delay or reduction of orders and shipments (as just happened with FPD inspection equipment), high volatility in quarterly orders, sales and profits, and extended valuations.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
An activist has come forward, and the external statutory auditor and lead shareholder (wife of founder) are against the offer, but Kosaido Co Ltd (7868 JP) situation still fits pretty cleanly in the “Too Hard” bucket for now.
Since announcing its foray into the deeper waters of being the fourth Type I Mobile Network Operator in Japan, Rakuten’s shares have taken a mighty hit. But the focus in this insight is on ride-sharing company Lyft. In March 2015, Rakuten CEO Hiroshi Mikitani announced that Rakuten had invested US$300mn in Lyft, giving it a 11.9% stake after Series E round in May 2015. Recent articles suggest that Rakuten remains the top investor.
As best as Travis Lundy can tell, from sources who track this, Rakuten is the single largest shareholder in Lyft, with a holding in the 10.4-12.0% range. That would suggest a position value of US$900mn-$1.2bn based on the last funding round in June 2018. At a $25bn pre-money IPO valuation, that would be worth US$1.5-2.0bn for a likely pre-tax IPO uplift of US$590-800mn.Â
A report late Thursday Asia time suggested the Lyft roadshow would start the week of March 18th, which would mean the S-1 will be available two weeks before that. Investors will know more about Rakuten’s ownership of Lyft by the end of next week or very early the following week. Travis would want to be long for now.
For DHICO, Mar 27 is the ex-rights day for both Common and RCPS. Subscription rights (for the Common) will be listed and trade on Apr 19~25. May 2 is final pricing. May 8 is subscription and May 16 is payment. New Common shares will be listed on May 29.
The 247-4 Form is out with a tender offer period between 26 Feb-1 April, and payment on the 4th April. The frustrating part is how Delta’s FY18 dividend of Bt2.30 is treated. On one hand, it says the Bt71 Offer price is final unless there is a MAC. Further into the Offer doc, it mentions the Offeror “reserves the right” to reduce the offer price if a dividend is paid. DELTA’s IR believes the dividend will be added, but it is not crystal clear.
Furthermore, there is no minimum acceptance condition, as potentially flagged earlier, which means there is no possibility of fast-tracking payment. Some precedent voluntary offers included a minimum acceptance, which provides an expedited payment should investors who tender shares AND revoke their right to withdraw – provided that minimum is fulfilled.
Shares traded up after the document came out, shrugging off the ambiguity in the document. Currently trading at a gross/annualised return of 1.1%/11%. The dividend is subject to a 10% tax for non-residents.
The previous Friday, the Offerors for M1 announced that their Offer had been declared Unconditional In All Respects as the tendered amount was 57.04% and the total held by concert parties was 76.35%. Axiata Group (AXIATA MK) made an announcement to the Bursa Malaysia that it had accepted the Offer as required because it was a significant asset disposal. Going unconditional has triggered an extension of the Closing Date to 4 March 2019.
If you want to fight this with an appraisal, you can. Travis doesn’t see the point. If you want to hold on to the stock in order to block full squeezeout and play chicken with the big boys, you can, but it requires a relatively big ticket (roughly 6.73% of the shares out).Â
So Travis recommends taking the money. It was better to take the money in early January and re-deploy, rather than wait for the close of the offer. He would accept now and sees no upside from waiting.
When the Tender Offer / MBO for Kosaido was announced last month, Travis’ first reaction was that this was wrong, concluding this was a virtual asset strip in progress, and suggested that the only way this was likely to not get done is if some brave activist came forward.
Shortly afterwards, an activist did come forward. Yoshiaki Murakami’s bought 5% through his entity Reno KK, and later lifted his stake (combined with affiliates) to 9.55%. Travis thought the stock had run too far at that point (Â¥775/share). While still cheap, he did not expect Bain to lift its price by 30+%, nor a white knight to arrive quickly enough.Â
This week a media article suggested longstanding external statutory auditor Mr. Nakatsuji and lead shareholder Sakurai Mie were against the takeover.
The possibility this deal fails because the “put protection” of the deal price at Â¥610 is no longer solid has gone up. Conversely, the probability that Bain and the MBO have to come in with a price adjustment higher has gone up. Travis is inclined to remain bearish in the medium-term as there is a significant likelihood there is no alternative solution during the Tender Offer period itself.Â
After announcing earlier this month a number of indicative non-binding bids were received for a “whole of company transaction”, the AFR is now reporting (paywalled) that Lone Star has also joined the battle for Aveo Group (AOG AU). (A Case for Privatising Aveo)
Saputo Inc (SAP CN) and Dairy Crest announced an all-cash deal where Saputo will buy Dairy Crest for 620p/share, to be implemented through a Scheme of Arrangement with an expected close in Q2 2019. This appears to tick all the necessary boxes. Friendly, horizontal integration, and limited job losses. Shares are trading through terms early (he published at 628.5p), perhaps on expectations the wide open register means shareholders can try to hold out for a higher price.
At almost 14x EV/EBITDA on a TTM basis and a bit lower on a March 2019 FY-end basis, it is a high enough multiple to not be insulting for a dairy company, and may keep other suitors away.
Dairy Crest’s directors have given irrevocable notice to accept, and the directors’ advisors (Greenhill & Co) have deemed the Offer “fair and reasonable.”
One extra turn of EV/EBITDA would lift the takeover price just under 10%. That would clear out most of the naysayers who bought in the frothier “we’re going to be an asset-light branded goods company” days of 2015-2017. Doable, but as it is an agreed deal, Travis doesn’t see the need to push it.Â
In its prior letter to Ophir on the 14 January, Petrus recommended selling the South-East Asian (SEA) assets to Medco, with a low-end fair value, before synergies, of £0.64/share, through to £1.42/share on a blue sky basis. It also argued that Ophir should negotiate with the Equatorial Guinea ministry (the regulator that terminated the Fortuna license, resulting in write-offs of US$610mn) to be compensated for its $700mn investment and the unfair seizure of the license, otherwise it would set a precedent for other international operators doing business in EG.
Petrus has now rounded on Schrader over perceived mismanagement of the EG licence, and a lack of professionalism in not soliciting and considering offers for Ophir from other buyers. Petrus’ beef is not an outlier –  alternative hedge fund Sand Grove has increased its exposure, via cash-settled derivatives, to 17.28% (as at 13 February); while Ian Hannam, who advised Ophir’s board on its 2013 right issue, is understood to have also written to Ophir’s interim CEO Alan Booth and the board saying Medco’s offer is too low.
Overall, Petrus’ assertions that Ophir is being sold at “sub optimal terms” appear valid, most notably on the EG compensation and the illogical operations update earlier this month. The alternative push to sell the SEA assets separately, as that has been Medco’s core focus, not international operations, also makes sense.
Last month, DSV A/S (DSV DC) made a public proposal of a takeover for cash and scrip valued at CHF 170/share, which came at a 24% premium to last and +31% vs 1-month VWAP. The #2, #3, and long-time #4 shareholders are firmly and publicly in the camp of trying to get something done. 45.9%-shareholder Ernst Göhner Foundation is sending mixed signals – do they want a higher price? Or do they want to wait and let Panalpina grow by its own consolidator strategy?
Panalpina has now confirmed that it in preliminary talks with Kuwait-listed logistics company Agility Public Warehouse. A Bloomberg report suggested a deal could be reached as early as this past week for Agility’s logistics business. The same article suggested the Göhner Foundation is supportive of the new talks. Agility’s press release was much more non-committal.
DSV has also announced a new all cash CHF 180/share offer for Panalpina; although the original cash and scrip offer was then worth CHF 184.5/share, which is an even better premium to pre-offer terms. One wonders whether cash-only would suit the Foundation; the DSV press release seemed to respond to that.
It is not clear what would drive the Foundation to give up its control. And Panalpina’s measly share price reaction to the all-cash offer suggest there is considerable skepticism out there. But at some price, Panalpina’s board looks pretty stupid to not accept the cash.
If you do not think a deal with DSV has any chance of getting up, Panalpina shares are a sell here. If they overpay for Agility and cannot improve their own margins well past historical highs in a market trending weaker, then the shares could drop.Â
Using Curtis’ figures, the implied stub is at its lowest level since a brief downward spike in February 2015, and you would have to go back to April 2014 to find a lower level.
The push back on this setup is that the auto operations have recorded marginally, yet sequential profit declines in FY16 and FY17; while recording three sequential quarterly declines up to December 2018. The big question is whether Mahindra can regain market share as it kick-starts a new model cycle.
In contrast, Sanghyun believes the Holdco is still undervalued relative to the Sub by about 10%. Plugging in Sanghyun’s numbers, I back out a discount to NAV of 45% against a one-year average of 30%, with a 12-month range of -51.5% to 15.5% (premium).
Back on the 13 December 2018, Can One announced a proposed MGO for Kian Joo at RM3.10/share, a 52.7% premium to last close. This required Can One shareholders’ approval which was received on the 14 February. Can One’s current 33% stake in Kian Joo accounts for ~86% of its market cap. The offer doc should be out, on or before the 7 March, with payment either late March (along with the first close of the Offer), or early April, depending on when the offer turns unconditional. The offer is conditional on 50% acceptance. Both sides are illiquid.
This looks like a decent exit for Kian Joo shareholders. Apart from EPF with 10.1%, former NED Teow China See is the only other shareholder with >5% with 8.9%.
For Can One, this is an aggressive pitch to make Kian Joo a subsidiary amidst an uncertain economic backdrop, while potential synergies may be offset via higher interest costs.
There are still two schools of thought on the HMG restructuring. One is that Glovis/Mobis are merged into a holdco entity. Or Glovis becomes the holdco with Mobis→ HM→ Kia Motors Corp (000270 KS) below. Since late 3Q18, there has been increased speculation on the latter. This has pushed up Glovis’ price relative to Mobis.
This speculation pushing up Glovis relative to Mobis has yet to be substantiated/justified, suggesting Glovis is overbought. Sanghyun expects a mean reversion, and recommends a long Mobis and short Glovis.
Navitas Ltd (NVT AU)Â has agreed to extend the exclusivity period granted to the BGH consortium to 1 March (from 18 Feb), in order to allow additional time for BGH to complete a limited set of remaining due diligence investigations.
Netcomm Wireless (NTC AU) has received $1.10 cash offer (53% premium to last close) from Casa Systems (CASA US) via a Scheme. The deal values Netcomm at ~US$114m. The scheme is subject to FIRB and shareholder approval. Stewart David Paul James, a NED, holds 12.3% and is the major shareholder. The announcement states that each Netcomm director intends to vote the Netcomm shares held by them in favour of the scheme – subject to a +ve IFA opinion and in the absence of a competing offer. This includes Stewart’s stake.
MYOB Group Ltd (MYO AU)announced no superior proposal emerged after concluding its ’go shop’ period for rival offers to KKR’s takeover proposal. At a gross/annualised spread of 0.9%/4.8%, assuming early May payment, this looks to be trading a bit tight.
CCASS
My ongoing series flags large moves (~10%) in CCASS holdings over the past week or so, moves which are often outside normal market transactions. These may be indicative of share pledges. Or potential takeovers. Or simply help understand volume swings.Â
Often these moves can easily be explained – the placement of new shares, rights issue, movements subsequent to a takeover, amongst others. For those mentioned below, I could not find an obvious reason for the CCASS move.  Â
NextDecade Corp (NEXT US) recently announced that it started offering long-term contracts indexed to the crude Brent in order to attract more LNG buyers. This follows the agreement reached by Tellurian Inc (TELL US) with Vitol back in December to index a long term contract with the Asian LNG price benchmark JKM. While typically US LNG projects are indexed to the Henry Hub, declining crude oil and LNG prices seem to have diminished the appeal of the Henry Hub pricing compared to the oil indexation. This insight takes a look at the latest trends in the LNG markets to assess which companies are taking the lead in the race to bring to FID in 2019 their proposed LNG projects.
Exhibit 1: NextDecade adds Brent indexation to its commercial offering
Source: NextDecade Corporate Presentation February 2019
INTRODUCTION – Following on from our review of the Market Composite and Sectors, this Insight will cover the cap-weighted Results & Revision Scores for the 328 Peer Groups that comprise our 30 Sectors providing greater depth to our analysis of current business trends. Peer Group definitions reflect both standard SIC/GICS classifications as well as local market conventions. The number of constituents and market capitalisation for each Peer Group varies widely.Â
RRS/RPS SCORE MATRIX – Combining our Results & Revision Scores (RRS) with each Peer Group’s Relative Price Score (RPS) allows a classification of our Peer Group universe into four quadrants –
‘Contrarian Buy‘Â > Low RRS & Low RPSÂ
‘Contrarian Sell’ > High RRS & High RPS
Peak Growth‘ > High RRS & Low RPS
‘Ex-Growth/Turnaround‘ > Low RRS & High RPS
THE ‘QUADRANTS’ – In the two ‘Contrarian‘ quadrants, the market is aligned with the current earnings momentum of the Peer Groups suggesting opportunities exist only for those willing or brave enough to take a contrarian view. For ‘Peak Growth‘ Peer Groups, the market is calling for a downturn in momentum that has yet to be reflected in quarterly earnings. Where the cycle is more prolonged than expected, there are often opportunities for short-term rebounds in what are normally relatively-inexpensive companies. The ‘Ex-Growth‘ quadrant often consists of former ‘Contrarian Sell‘s where the market is reluctant to acknowledge that the cycle has turned. This quadrant can also contain ‘Turnarounds‘ – formerly ‘Contrarian Buys‘ where the market is correctly anticipating a change in fortunes.  Â
In the DETAIL section below, we list the top and bottom twenty Peer Groups ranked by Results & Revision Score and the top and bottom twenty most-changed over the last three months as well the most optimistic and most pessimistic. In our ranked tables we have listed only those Peer Groups with an aggregate capitalisation of over Â¥50b.Â
Government plans to manage the effects of the consumption tax increase of 2% to 10%, due in October, continue to develop.
As in 2014 when sales tax rose from 5% to 8%, companies are nervous that the increase will lead to a significant downturn in consumption, and the government is chafing under pressure, both from businesses and the opposition.
The latest idea is to pump more money into the economy, while at the same time insisting that Japan’s massive debt levels will fall, partly thanks to stimulus from Japan’s new free trade deal with the EU and its role in the TPP.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
In this report, we compare the recent dynamic foreign tourists trend to Korea and Japan. In January 2019, the number of foreign visitors to Japan rose 7.5% YoY to 2.69 million. A total of 0.78 million from South Korea visited Japan in January (DOWN 3% YoY) followed by 0.75 million people from China (up 19.3% YoY).
According to Korea Ministry of Economy & Finance (MoEF), the number of people from China to Korea increased 35.1% YoY in January 2019.
As evidenced by the better than expected Chinese visitors to Korea and worse than expected South Korean visitors to Japan in January, there is an increasing indication that this trend could continue in 2019. Many of the Korean related cosmetics stocks have positively reacted to the recent data. One of the interesting trades to be long on a basket of Korean cosmetics related stocks and be short on a basket of Japanese cosmetics related names.Â
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
In this report, we compare the recent dynamic foreign tourists trend to Korea and Japan. In January 2019, the number of foreign visitors to Japan rose 7.5% YoY to 2.69 million. A total of 0.78 million from South Korea visited Japan in January (DOWN 3% YoY) followed by 0.75 million people from China (up 19.3% YoY).
According to Korea Ministry of Economy & Finance (MoEF), the number of people from China to Korea increased 35.1% YoY in January 2019.
As evidenced by the better than expected Chinese visitors to Korea and worse than expected South Korean visitors to Japan in January, there is an increasing indication that this trend could continue in 2019. Many of the Korean related cosmetics stocks have positively reacted to the recent data. One of the interesting trades to be long on a basket of Korean cosmetics related stocks and be short on a basket of Japanese cosmetics related names.Â
Tokyo Electron (8035 JP) is a semiconductor equipment manufacturer based in Japan. The company has been operating in the semiconductor space for several decades and generates nearly 90.0% of its revenue from the sale of semiconductor equipment.
The company revenues are highly correlated with worldwide semiconductor revenues. The current softness in the semiconductor market has already caused a decline in company earnings for 3QFY03/19 and we expect the company earnings to deteriorate further as the market has just begun witnessing the demand decline.
Even though IoT, cloud, big data, 5G and AI are expected to drive semiconductor revenues and make up for the declining demand from smartphones, tablets and PCs, we do not expect this to drive a significant change in semiconductor demand for another few years as the technologies are still not fully developed.
Based on our valuation, the company share price is still overvalued despite the stock losing more than 20% to-date since the market started decelerating in mid-2018. As the current semiconductor cycle nears its worst, we feel the company share price will dip further with the earnings outlook deteriorating.
If one were looking for evidence of the inherent dangers of risk concentration in the banking industry, one need only look to tiny secondary regional bank Tochigi Bank (8550 JP), which reported its earnings for the nine months to end-December 2018 on 31 January 2019. Having made consolidated net profits of ¥1.57 billion in 1H FY3/2019, the bank plunged into the red in 3Q by ¥1.80 billion as a result of losses on disposing of fixed-rate US$-denominated securities. Rather surprisingly, foreign investors own just over 21% of outstanding shares. Tochigi Bank may not be the only small Japanese bank to run into trouble with its foreign securities portfolio in CY2019. Caveat emptor!  (May the buyer beware)!
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
