Industrials

In this briefing:

1. Hyundai Motor Share Class: Time to Short Common & Long Pref
2. Yungtay Noises Haven’t Produced a Result Yet
3. Kosaido (7868 JP) TOB Extended
4. StubWorld: PCCW Is “Cheap” but Stub Ops Are Deteriorating
5. MODEC: Add

1. Hyundai Motor Share Class: Time to Short Common & Long Pref

• Common is widening pref discount today as it is generating the highest gain mainly on the Elliott pushing. As of now (1PM in Korea time), Common and 1P/2PB gain difference is nearly 1.5%p. This is putting price ratio at nearly 120D high. On a 20D MA, both Common/1P and Common/2PB are above 200% of σ. We see this level for the first time since mid Dec last year.
• It is unlikely that Elliott’s ₩4.5tril dividend demand will get shareholder approval in the upcoming Mar 22 AGM. But it is enough to create a market mood that Hyundai Motor will hand out more generous shareholder friendly measures. Generally, common gets favored market sentiment as we move into AGM cycle. This time should be different. Each time Elliott factor came in, HM Pref tended to outperform Common.
• This should be time again for HM Pref to shine more. Both 1P and 2PB are sufficiently undervalued relative to Common. Div yield difference to Common is also at the highest for both pref types. I’d go short Common and long 1P or 2PB now. 1P seems a little more safe bet. But 2PB is more liquid. Either way wouldn’t go terribly wrong.

2. Yungtay Noises Haven’t Produced a Result Yet

After almost three months of preparation after the initial news came out in October, Hitachi Ltd (6501 JP) launched its Tender Offer for Yungtay Engineering (1507 TT) in mid-January 2019. 

The background of the two companies’ relationship, the board kerfuffle last year, and some detail on the financials and the growth of the Chinese mainland elevator market was discussed extensively in Going Up! Hitachi Tender for Yungtay Engineering (1507 TT)at the end of October. When the Tender Offer was confirmed as launched, additional details were provided in Hitachi Tender for Yungtay Engineering Launches.

Since then, there has been a litany of small “nuisance” events which so far have not resulted in any changes to the terms of the Tender Offer, but keeping a watchful eye is recommended.

3. Kosaido (7868 JP) TOB Extended

As discussed in previous insights, Kosaido Co Ltd (7868 JP) is currently the subject of a TOB (Takeover Bid) by an SPV established by Bain to acquire all the shares outstanding. This has been discussed in three different insights so far.
  ❖ Smallcap Kosaido (7868 JP) Tender Offer: Wrong Price But Whaddya Gonna Do?
  ❖ Kosaido: Activism Drives Price 30+% Through Terms
  ❖ Kosaido TOB: Situation Gets Weird – Activists+Independent Opposition to MBO 

The TOB started as a lowball price TOB with the explanation that the MBO was needed to rehabilitate the printing/information business which makes up three-quarters of consolidated revenue of the company and is the basis upon which the company was founded decades ago.

A read between the lines showed quite quickly that the more ostensible reason for taking the company private was to be able to own 61% of the company which provided the other 25% of consolidated revenue and made up materially all of the operating profit of Kosaido over the past few years. And that business was being bought at just over half of book while the rest of the business was being bought for effectively zero.

My first insight questioned that despite “independent directors” not doing so, and an activist in the form of Yoshiaki Murakami’s firm Reno KK did something about it, quickly buying just under 10% of the company in the two weeks after announcement. On that news, the stock shot up to 30-40% through terms, and fell back, but since it started rising above terms and peaking, it has not fallen below about 15% through terms.

The New News

YESTERDAY, the directors of Kosaido released an amendment to their Statement of Support of the Tender Offer adding a phrase to the effect that “subsequent to the initial meeting where all the statutory auditors had expressed support, at the Board Meeting on the 25th of February, Independent Statutory Auditor Nakatsuji-[san] expressed his opposition to the Tender Offer.” This follows his notice of opposition on the 19th.

TODAY, the Offeror announced an Amendment to the Tender Offer and was extending its Tender Offer by 7 business days – from 30 business days to 37 business days – which has the effect of changing the Closing Date from March 1 to March 12.

With the shares 20% through terms (¥738/share as I write) despite what appears to be no increase by the main activist in the last two weeks, the likelihood retail will tender at ¥610/share this looks like a situation where the deal may fail unless there is a bump.

But it would still be up for grabs. 

4. StubWorld: PCCW Is “Cheap” but Stub Ops Are Deteriorating

This week in StubWorld …

• Select media ops (Free TV and OTT), together with substantial losses booked to other businesses and eliminations, continue to weigh heavily on PCCW Ltd (8 HK)‘s stub ops.

Preceding my comments on PCCW and other stubs are the weekly setup/unwind tables for Asia-Pacific Holdcos.

These relationships trade with a minimum liquidity threshold of US$1mn on a 90-day moving average, and a % market capitalisation threshold – the $ value of the holding/opco held, over the parent’s market capitalisation, expressed in percent – of at least 20%.

5. MODEC: Add

Towards the end of 2018 Modec Inc (6269 JP)‘s share price dropped 46.5% as the price of crude oil also cratered, falling 44.4% . Since that plunge, the stock price has rebounded 53.9% as the company posted excellent results at 4Q and guidance, while conservative, was for continued healthy earnings.

Having visited the company today, we believe earnings should continue to be strong and actually strengthen over the next few years with MODEC likely to start running into capacity constraints over the course of this year.

In this briefing:

1. Sunpower: Excellent FY18 Results; Strong Outlook for FY19. Fair Value Remains 1 SGD (70% Upside)
2. S&P 500 and S&P 600 Testing Resistance
3. Korean Stubs Spotlight: Focus on Diverging Share Prices and Changes to Foreign Ownership
4. Procurri: Exit DeClout, Enter Novo Tellus. Company Remains Highly Undervalued at 4.4x 2018 EV/EBITDA
5. PRM: Thai Largest Tanker Fleets Assured of Consistent Growth

1. Sunpower: Excellent FY18 Results; Strong Outlook for FY19. Fair Value Remains 1 SGD (70% Upside)

Sunpower Group (SPWG SP) has seen an incredible transformation over the past 24 months. Since the entry of two respected PE funds (DCP and CDH) the company has de-emphasized its historical M&S business and pushed full throttle on its GI (Green Investments) portfolio.

The efforts of this shift to GI are now bearing fruit with FY18 revenues increasing by 66% to 3.26 billion RMB, EBITDA rising by 113.5% to 496 million RMB (15.2% EBITDA margin) and underlying NPAT rising by 87% to 268 million RMB. Most importantly, the quality and visibility of its cash flows have improved.

It is rare to find companies that give you 3-year NPAT forecasts but Sunpower did this with the issuance of its second CB late 3Q18. Instead of using stale sell-side consensus forecasts we now focus on these public forecasts to guide investors what Sunpower’s fair value is depending on the PE multiple that investors apply.

My Fair Value estimate of 1 SGD remains unchanged (based on 15x FY21 EPS and company meeting its FY21 NPAT targets as communicated in CB2 prospectus).

2. S&P 500 and S&P 600 Testing Resistance

We believe the market is at short-term overbought extremes and is contending with resistance. Resistance levels we are monitoring include 2,810-2,817 on the S&P 500 and the 200-day moving average on the S&P 600 Small Cap index… see charts below. We would welcome some consolidation or a mild pullback which would be a healthy correction of the current extended market conditions.

In today’s report we highlight attractive Groups and stocks within Manufacturing and Technology: Construction Equipment, Industrial Rental Equipment, Data Storage Solutions & Devices, Small-Cap, and Software, Financial Mgmt. Solutions.

3. Korean Stubs Spotlight: Focus on Diverging Share Prices and Changes to Foreign Ownership

In this report, we provide the one year share price comparisons of the holdcos and the opcos in both table and chart formats as well as changes to the foreign ownership stakes of these companies YTD. Significant, rapid changes to the foreign shareholdings of these companies sometimes lead to opportunities in the holdco/opco pair trades. 

Among these 30 pair of companies, five pairs in particular are interesting where the difference in their share prices have diverged significantly in the past year (by 30% or more). These five pairs of companies include the following:  

• Hyosung Corp vs. Hyosung Advanced Materials  
• BGF Retail vs. BGF Co.  
• Doosan Corp vs. Doosan Heavy Industries Corp.  
• Cuckoo Holdings vs. Cuckoo Homesys  
• Orion Holdings vs. Orion Corp

4. Procurri: Exit DeClout, Enter Novo Tellus. Company Remains Highly Undervalued at 4.4x 2018 EV/EBITDA

Procurri Corporation (PROC SP) released FY18 results which showed the company growing revenues to 220M SGD (+21% vs FY17), EBITDA to 19.7M SGD (+185% vs FY17), PBT to 10.1M SGD (vs 2.3M loss in 2017) and a small net profit of 5.3M SGD which was artificially low because of an astronomical 47% tax rate. The high tax rate should reverse in 2H19 which would show the reported profitability of Procurri improve substantially. 

Procurri remains deep value trading at just 4.4x 2018 EV/EBITDA and 0.4x 2018 EV/Sales. If we adjust the FY18 net profit figure(assume 30% tax rate vs 47%) the shares trade at a P/E multiple of just 13x.

The shareholder register of Procurri has seen a dramatic change YTD with multiple announcements on SGX. The most significant development is the entry of Singapore PE fund Novo Tellus acquiring a 29.6% stake on 19/2/19. Consequently this means that the biggest corporate overhang on Procurri (read: the control by Declout Ltd (DLL SP) ) is now almost over with their stake reduced to 17% from 47% previously.

Given the well-publicized track record of Novo Tellus at SGX listed Aem Holdings (AEM SP) the question is if Novo Tellus sees another multi-bagger in the making?

While a “10-bagger” type return like AEM is unlikely at Procurri, doubling the market cap from 90M to 180M SGD would not be impossible as Procurri continues to grow in FY19 and the depressed multiple expands modestly.

5. PRM: Thai Largest Tanker Fleets Assured of Consistent Growth

We initiate coverage of PRM with a BUY rating, based on a target price of Bt7.70, derived from a PEG ratio of 0.9x, which is the average for the Asia ex-japan transportation sector, implying 22.0x PE’19E.

The story:

• Secured revenue from domestic trading business
• IMO 2020 implementation to propel floating storage demand
• Recovery in T/C rate should prompt international trading turnaround

Risks:  Lower-than-expected domestic oil consumption and trading activities in ASEAN, foreign currency and fuel cost fluctuations

In this briefing:

1. S&P 500 and S&P 600 Testing Resistance
2. Korean Stubs Spotlight: Focus on Diverging Share Prices and Changes to Foreign Ownership
3. Procurri: Exit DeClout, Enter Novo Tellus. Company Remains Highly Undervalued at 4.4x 2018 EV/EBITDA
4. PRM: Thai Largest Tanker Fleets Assured of Consistent Growth
5. Hyundai Motor Share Class: Time to Short Common & Long Pref

1. S&P 500 and S&P 600 Testing Resistance

We believe the market is at short-term overbought extremes and is contending with resistance. Resistance levels we are monitoring include 2,810-2,817 on the S&P 500 and the 200-day moving average on the S&P 600 Small Cap index… see charts below. We would welcome some consolidation or a mild pullback which would be a healthy correction of the current extended market conditions.

In today’s report we highlight attractive Groups and stocks within Manufacturing and Technology: Construction Equipment, Industrial Rental Equipment, Data Storage Solutions & Devices, Small-Cap, and Software, Financial Mgmt. Solutions.

2. Korean Stubs Spotlight: Focus on Diverging Share Prices and Changes to Foreign Ownership

In this report, we provide the one year share price comparisons of the holdcos and the opcos in both table and chart formats as well as changes to the foreign ownership stakes of these companies YTD. Significant, rapid changes to the foreign shareholdings of these companies sometimes lead to opportunities in the holdco/opco pair trades. 

Among these 30 pair of companies, five pairs in particular are interesting where the difference in their share prices have diverged significantly in the past year (by 30% or more). These five pairs of companies include the following:  

• Hyosung Corp vs. Hyosung Advanced Materials  
• BGF Retail vs. BGF Co.  
• Doosan Corp vs. Doosan Heavy Industries Corp.  
• Cuckoo Holdings vs. Cuckoo Homesys  
• Orion Holdings vs. Orion Corp

3. Procurri: Exit DeClout, Enter Novo Tellus. Company Remains Highly Undervalued at 4.4x 2018 EV/EBITDA

Procurri Corporation (PROC SP) released FY18 results which showed the company growing revenues to 220M SGD (+21% vs FY17), EBITDA to 19.7M SGD (+185% vs FY17), PBT to 10.1M SGD (vs 2.3M loss in 2017) and a small net profit of 5.3M SGD which was artificially low because of an astronomical 47% tax rate. The high tax rate should reverse in 2H19 which would show the reported profitability of Procurri improve substantially. 

Procurri remains deep value trading at just 4.4x 2018 EV/EBITDA and 0.4x 2018 EV/Sales. If we adjust the FY18 net profit figure(assume 30% tax rate vs 47%) the shares trade at a P/E multiple of just 13x.

The shareholder register of Procurri has seen a dramatic change YTD with multiple announcements on SGX. The most significant development is the entry of Singapore PE fund Novo Tellus acquiring a 29.6% stake on 19/2/19. Consequently this means that the biggest corporate overhang on Procurri (read: the control by Declout Ltd (DLL SP) ) is now almost over with their stake reduced to 17% from 47% previously.

Given the well-publicized track record of Novo Tellus at SGX listed Aem Holdings (AEM SP) the question is if Novo Tellus sees another multi-bagger in the making?

While a “10-bagger” type return like AEM is unlikely at Procurri, doubling the market cap from 90M to 180M SGD would not be impossible as Procurri continues to grow in FY19 and the depressed multiple expands modestly.

4. PRM: Thai Largest Tanker Fleets Assured of Consistent Growth

We initiate coverage of PRM with a BUY rating, based on a target price of Bt7.70, derived from a PEG ratio of 0.9x, which is the average for the Asia ex-japan transportation sector, implying 22.0x PE’19E.

The story:

• Secured revenue from domestic trading business
• IMO 2020 implementation to propel floating storage demand
• Recovery in T/C rate should prompt international trading turnaround

Risks:  Lower-than-expected domestic oil consumption and trading activities in ASEAN, foreign currency and fuel cost fluctuations

5. Hyundai Motor Share Class: Time to Short Common & Long Pref

• Common is widening pref discount today as it is generating the highest gain mainly on the Elliott pushing. As of now (1PM in Korea time), Common and 1P/2PB gain difference is nearly 1.5%p. This is putting price ratio at nearly 120D high. On a 20D MA, both Common/1P and Common/2PB are above 200% of σ. We see this level for the first time since mid Dec last year.
• It is unlikely that Elliott’s ₩4.5tril dividend demand will get shareholder approval in the upcoming Mar 22 AGM. But it is enough to create a market mood that Hyundai Motor will hand out more generous shareholder friendly measures. Generally, common gets favored market sentiment as we move into AGM cycle. This time should be different. Each time Elliott factor came in, HM Pref tended to outperform Common.
• This should be time again for HM Pref to shine more. Both 1P and 2PB are sufficiently undervalued relative to Common. Div yield difference to Common is also at the highest for both pref types. I’d go short Common and long 1P or 2PB now. 1P seems a little more safe bet. But 2PB is more liquid. Either way wouldn’t go terribly wrong.

In this briefing:

1. Korean Stubs Spotlight: Focus on Diverging Share Prices and Changes to Foreign Ownership
2. Procurri: Exit DeClout, Enter Novo Tellus. Company Remains Highly Undervalued at 4.4x 2018 EV/EBITDA
3. PRM: Thai Largest Tanker Fleets Assured of Consistent Growth
4. Hyundai Motor Share Class: Time to Short Common & Long Pref
5. Yungtay Noises Haven’t Produced a Result Yet

1. Korean Stubs Spotlight: Focus on Diverging Share Prices and Changes to Foreign Ownership

In this report, we provide the one year share price comparisons of the holdcos and the opcos in both table and chart formats as well as changes to the foreign ownership stakes of these companies YTD. Significant, rapid changes to the foreign shareholdings of these companies sometimes lead to opportunities in the holdco/opco pair trades. 

Among these 30 pair of companies, five pairs in particular are interesting where the difference in their share prices have diverged significantly in the past year (by 30% or more). These five pairs of companies include the following:  

• Hyosung Corp vs. Hyosung Advanced Materials  
• BGF Retail vs. BGF Co.  
• Doosan Corp vs. Doosan Heavy Industries Corp.  
• Cuckoo Holdings vs. Cuckoo Homesys  
• Orion Holdings vs. Orion Corp

2. Procurri: Exit DeClout, Enter Novo Tellus. Company Remains Highly Undervalued at 4.4x 2018 EV/EBITDA

Procurri Corporation (PROC SP) released FY18 results which showed the company growing revenues to 220M SGD (+21% vs FY17), EBITDA to 19.7M SGD (+185% vs FY17), PBT to 10.1M SGD (vs 2.3M loss in 2017) and a small net profit of 5.3M SGD which was artificially low because of an astronomical 47% tax rate. The high tax rate should reverse in 2H19 which would show the reported profitability of Procurri improve substantially. 

Procurri remains deep value trading at just 4.4x 2018 EV/EBITDA and 0.4x 2018 EV/Sales. If we adjust the FY18 net profit figure(assume 30% tax rate vs 47%) the shares trade at a P/E multiple of just 13x.

The shareholder register of Procurri has seen a dramatic change YTD with multiple announcements on SGX. The most significant development is the entry of Singapore PE fund Novo Tellus acquiring a 29.6% stake on 19/2/19. Consequently this means that the biggest corporate overhang on Procurri (read: the control by Declout Ltd (DLL SP) ) is now almost over with their stake reduced to 17% from 47% previously.

Given the well-publicized track record of Novo Tellus at SGX listed Aem Holdings (AEM SP) the question is if Novo Tellus sees another multi-bagger in the making?

While a “10-bagger” type return like AEM is unlikely at Procurri, doubling the market cap from 90M to 180M SGD would not be impossible as Procurri continues to grow in FY19 and the depressed multiple expands modestly.

3. PRM: Thai Largest Tanker Fleets Assured of Consistent Growth

We initiate coverage of PRM with a BUY rating, based on a target price of Bt7.70, derived from a PEG ratio of 0.9x, which is the average for the Asia ex-japan transportation sector, implying 22.0x PE’19E.

The story:

• Secured revenue from domestic trading business
• IMO 2020 implementation to propel floating storage demand
• Recovery in T/C rate should prompt international trading turnaround

Risks:  Lower-than-expected domestic oil consumption and trading activities in ASEAN, foreign currency and fuel cost fluctuations

4. Hyundai Motor Share Class: Time to Short Common & Long Pref

• Common is widening pref discount today as it is generating the highest gain mainly on the Elliott pushing. As of now (1PM in Korea time), Common and 1P/2PB gain difference is nearly 1.5%p. This is putting price ratio at nearly 120D high. On a 20D MA, both Common/1P and Common/2PB are above 200% of σ. We see this level for the first time since mid Dec last year.
• It is unlikely that Elliott’s ₩4.5tril dividend demand will get shareholder approval in the upcoming Mar 22 AGM. But it is enough to create a market mood that Hyundai Motor will hand out more generous shareholder friendly measures. Generally, common gets favored market sentiment as we move into AGM cycle. This time should be different. Each time Elliott factor came in, HM Pref tended to outperform Common.
• This should be time again for HM Pref to shine more. Both 1P and 2PB are sufficiently undervalued relative to Common. Div yield difference to Common is also at the highest for both pref types. I’d go short Common and long 1P or 2PB now. 1P seems a little more safe bet. But 2PB is more liquid. Either way wouldn’t go terribly wrong.

5. Yungtay Noises Haven’t Produced a Result Yet

After almost three months of preparation after the initial news came out in October, Hitachi Ltd (6501 JP) launched its Tender Offer for Yungtay Engineering (1507 TT) in mid-January 2019. 

The background of the two companies’ relationship, the board kerfuffle last year, and some detail on the financials and the growth of the Chinese mainland elevator market was discussed extensively in Going Up! Hitachi Tender for Yungtay Engineering (1507 TT)at the end of October. When the Tender Offer was confirmed as launched, additional details were provided in Hitachi Tender for Yungtay Engineering Launches.

Since then, there has been a litany of small “nuisance” events which so far have not resulted in any changes to the terms of the Tender Offer, but keeping a watchful eye is recommended.

In this briefing:

1. Procurri: Exit DeClout, Enter Novo Tellus. Company Remains Highly Undervalued at 4.4x 2018 EV/EBITDA
2. PRM: Thai Largest Tanker Fleets Assured of Consistent Growth
3. Hyundai Motor Share Class: Time to Short Common & Long Pref
4. Yungtay Noises Haven’t Produced a Result Yet
5. Kosaido (7868 JP) TOB Extended

1. Procurri: Exit DeClout, Enter Novo Tellus. Company Remains Highly Undervalued at 4.4x 2018 EV/EBITDA

Procurri Corporation (PROC SP) released FY18 results which showed the company growing revenues to 220M SGD (+21% vs FY17), EBITDA to 19.7M SGD (+185% vs FY17), PBT to 10.1M SGD (vs 2.3M loss in 2017) and a small net profit of 5.3M SGD which was artificially low because of an astronomical 47% tax rate. The high tax rate should reverse in 2H19 which would show the reported profitability of Procurri improve substantially. 

Procurri remains deep value trading at just 4.4x 2018 EV/EBITDA and 0.4x 2018 EV/Sales. If we adjust the FY18 net profit figure(assume 30% tax rate vs 47%) the shares trade at a P/E multiple of just 13x.

The shareholder register of Procurri has seen a dramatic change YTD with multiple announcements on SGX. The most significant development is the entry of Singapore PE fund Novo Tellus acquiring a 29.6% stake on 19/2/19. Consequently this means that the biggest corporate overhang on Procurri (read: the control by Declout Ltd (DLL SP) ) is now almost over with their stake reduced to 17% from 47% previously.

Given the well-publicized track record of Novo Tellus at SGX listed Aem Holdings (AEM SP) the question is if Novo Tellus sees another multi-bagger in the making?

While a “10-bagger” type return like AEM is unlikely at Procurri, doubling the market cap from 90M to 180M SGD would not be impossible as Procurri continues to grow in FY19 and the depressed multiple expands modestly.

2. PRM: Thai Largest Tanker Fleets Assured of Consistent Growth

We initiate coverage of PRM with a BUY rating, based on a target price of Bt7.70, derived from a PEG ratio of 0.9x, which is the average for the Asia ex-japan transportation sector, implying 22.0x PE’19E.

The story:

• Secured revenue from domestic trading business
• IMO 2020 implementation to propel floating storage demand
• Recovery in T/C rate should prompt international trading turnaround

Risks:  Lower-than-expected domestic oil consumption and trading activities in ASEAN, foreign currency and fuel cost fluctuations

3. Hyundai Motor Share Class: Time to Short Common & Long Pref

• Common is widening pref discount today as it is generating the highest gain mainly on the Elliott pushing. As of now (1PM in Korea time), Common and 1P/2PB gain difference is nearly 1.5%p. This is putting price ratio at nearly 120D high. On a 20D MA, both Common/1P and Common/2PB are above 200% of σ. We see this level for the first time since mid Dec last year.
• It is unlikely that Elliott’s ₩4.5tril dividend demand will get shareholder approval in the upcoming Mar 22 AGM. But it is enough to create a market mood that Hyundai Motor will hand out more generous shareholder friendly measures. Generally, common gets favored market sentiment as we move into AGM cycle. This time should be different. Each time Elliott factor came in, HM Pref tended to outperform Common.
• This should be time again for HM Pref to shine more. Both 1P and 2PB are sufficiently undervalued relative to Common. Div yield difference to Common is also at the highest for both pref types. I’d go short Common and long 1P or 2PB now. 1P seems a little more safe bet. But 2PB is more liquid. Either way wouldn’t go terribly wrong.

4. Yungtay Noises Haven’t Produced a Result Yet

After almost three months of preparation after the initial news came out in October, Hitachi Ltd (6501 JP) launched its Tender Offer for Yungtay Engineering (1507 TT) in mid-January 2019. 

The background of the two companies’ relationship, the board kerfuffle last year, and some detail on the financials and the growth of the Chinese mainland elevator market was discussed extensively in Going Up! Hitachi Tender for Yungtay Engineering (1507 TT)at the end of October. When the Tender Offer was confirmed as launched, additional details were provided in Hitachi Tender for Yungtay Engineering Launches.

Since then, there has been a litany of small “nuisance” events which so far have not resulted in any changes to the terms of the Tender Offer, but keeping a watchful eye is recommended.

5. Kosaido (7868 JP) TOB Extended

As discussed in previous insights, Kosaido Co Ltd (7868 JP) is currently the subject of a TOB (Takeover Bid) by an SPV established by Bain to acquire all the shares outstanding. This has been discussed in three different insights so far.
  ❖ Smallcap Kosaido (7868 JP) Tender Offer: Wrong Price But Whaddya Gonna Do?
  ❖ Kosaido: Activism Drives Price 30+% Through Terms
  ❖ Kosaido TOB: Situation Gets Weird – Activists+Independent Opposition to MBO 

The TOB started as a lowball price TOB with the explanation that the MBO was needed to rehabilitate the printing/information business which makes up three-quarters of consolidated revenue of the company and is the basis upon which the company was founded decades ago.

A read between the lines showed quite quickly that the more ostensible reason for taking the company private was to be able to own 61% of the company which provided the other 25% of consolidated revenue and made up materially all of the operating profit of Kosaido over the past few years. And that business was being bought at just over half of book while the rest of the business was being bought for effectively zero.

My first insight questioned that despite “independent directors” not doing so, and an activist in the form of Yoshiaki Murakami’s firm Reno KK did something about it, quickly buying just under 10% of the company in the two weeks after announcement. On that news, the stock shot up to 30-40% through terms, and fell back, but since it started rising above terms and peaking, it has not fallen below about 15% through terms.

The New News

YESTERDAY, the directors of Kosaido released an amendment to their Statement of Support of the Tender Offer adding a phrase to the effect that “subsequent to the initial meeting where all the statutory auditors had expressed support, at the Board Meeting on the 25th of February, Independent Statutory Auditor Nakatsuji-[san] expressed his opposition to the Tender Offer.” This follows his notice of opposition on the 19th.

TODAY, the Offeror announced an Amendment to the Tender Offer and was extending its Tender Offer by 7 business days – from 30 business days to 37 business days – which has the effect of changing the Closing Date from March 1 to March 12.

With the shares 20% through terms (¥738/share as I write) despite what appears to be no increase by the main activist in the last two weeks, the likelihood retail will tender at ¥610/share this looks like a situation where the deal may fail unless there is a bump.

But it would still be up for grabs. 

In this briefing:

1. PRM: Thai Largest Tanker Fleets Assured of Consistent Growth
2. Hyundai Motor Share Class: Time to Short Common & Long Pref
3. Yungtay Noises Haven’t Produced a Result Yet
4. Kosaido (7868 JP) TOB Extended
5. StubWorld: PCCW Is “Cheap” but Stub Ops Are Deteriorating

1. PRM: Thai Largest Tanker Fleets Assured of Consistent Growth

We initiate coverage of PRM with a BUY rating, based on a target price of Bt7.70, derived from a PEG ratio of 0.9x, which is the average for the Asia ex-japan transportation sector, implying 22.0x PE’19E.

The story:

• Secured revenue from domestic trading business
• IMO 2020 implementation to propel floating storage demand
• Recovery in T/C rate should prompt international trading turnaround

Risks:  Lower-than-expected domestic oil consumption and trading activities in ASEAN, foreign currency and fuel cost fluctuations

2. Hyundai Motor Share Class: Time to Short Common & Long Pref

• Common is widening pref discount today as it is generating the highest gain mainly on the Elliott pushing. As of now (1PM in Korea time), Common and 1P/2PB gain difference is nearly 1.5%p. This is putting price ratio at nearly 120D high. On a 20D MA, both Common/1P and Common/2PB are above 200% of σ. We see this level for the first time since mid Dec last year.
• It is unlikely that Elliott’s ₩4.5tril dividend demand will get shareholder approval in the upcoming Mar 22 AGM. But it is enough to create a market mood that Hyundai Motor will hand out more generous shareholder friendly measures. Generally, common gets favored market sentiment as we move into AGM cycle. This time should be different. Each time Elliott factor came in, HM Pref tended to outperform Common.
• This should be time again for HM Pref to shine more. Both 1P and 2PB are sufficiently undervalued relative to Common. Div yield difference to Common is also at the highest for both pref types. I’d go short Common and long 1P or 2PB now. 1P seems a little more safe bet. But 2PB is more liquid. Either way wouldn’t go terribly wrong.

3. Yungtay Noises Haven’t Produced a Result Yet

After almost three months of preparation after the initial news came out in October, Hitachi Ltd (6501 JP) launched its Tender Offer for Yungtay Engineering (1507 TT) in mid-January 2019. 

The background of the two companies’ relationship, the board kerfuffle last year, and some detail on the financials and the growth of the Chinese mainland elevator market was discussed extensively in Going Up! Hitachi Tender for Yungtay Engineering (1507 TT)at the end of October. When the Tender Offer was confirmed as launched, additional details were provided in Hitachi Tender for Yungtay Engineering Launches.

Since then, there has been a litany of small “nuisance” events which so far have not resulted in any changes to the terms of the Tender Offer, but keeping a watchful eye is recommended.

4. Kosaido (7868 JP) TOB Extended

As discussed in previous insights, Kosaido Co Ltd (7868 JP) is currently the subject of a TOB (Takeover Bid) by an SPV established by Bain to acquire all the shares outstanding. This has been discussed in three different insights so far.
  ❖ Smallcap Kosaido (7868 JP) Tender Offer: Wrong Price But Whaddya Gonna Do?
  ❖ Kosaido: Activism Drives Price 30+% Through Terms
  ❖ Kosaido TOB: Situation Gets Weird – Activists+Independent Opposition to MBO 

The TOB started as a lowball price TOB with the explanation that the MBO was needed to rehabilitate the printing/information business which makes up three-quarters of consolidated revenue of the company and is the basis upon which the company was founded decades ago.

A read between the lines showed quite quickly that the more ostensible reason for taking the company private was to be able to own 61% of the company which provided the other 25% of consolidated revenue and made up materially all of the operating profit of Kosaido over the past few years. And that business was being bought at just over half of book while the rest of the business was being bought for effectively zero.

My first insight questioned that despite “independent directors” not doing so, and an activist in the form of Yoshiaki Murakami’s firm Reno KK did something about it, quickly buying just under 10% of the company in the two weeks after announcement. On that news, the stock shot up to 30-40% through terms, and fell back, but since it started rising above terms and peaking, it has not fallen below about 15% through terms.

The New News

YESTERDAY, the directors of Kosaido released an amendment to their Statement of Support of the Tender Offer adding a phrase to the effect that “subsequent to the initial meeting where all the statutory auditors had expressed support, at the Board Meeting on the 25th of February, Independent Statutory Auditor Nakatsuji-[san] expressed his opposition to the Tender Offer.” This follows his notice of opposition on the 19th.

TODAY, the Offeror announced an Amendment to the Tender Offer and was extending its Tender Offer by 7 business days – from 30 business days to 37 business days – which has the effect of changing the Closing Date from March 1 to March 12.

With the shares 20% through terms (¥738/share as I write) despite what appears to be no increase by the main activist in the last two weeks, the likelihood retail will tender at ¥610/share this looks like a situation where the deal may fail unless there is a bump.

But it would still be up for grabs. 

5. StubWorld: PCCW Is “Cheap” but Stub Ops Are Deteriorating

This week in StubWorld …

• Select media ops (Free TV and OTT), together with substantial losses booked to other businesses and eliminations, continue to weigh heavily on PCCW Ltd (8 HK)‘s stub ops.

Preceding my comments on PCCW and other stubs are the weekly setup/unwind tables for Asia-Pacific Holdcos.

These relationships trade with a minimum liquidity threshold of US$1mn on a 90-day moving average, and a % market capitalisation threshold – the $ value of the holding/opco held, over the parent’s market capitalisation, expressed in percent – of at least 20%.

In this briefing:

1. Yungtay Noises Haven’t Produced a Result Yet
2. Kosaido (7868 JP) TOB Extended
3. StubWorld: PCCW Is “Cheap” but Stub Ops Are Deteriorating
4. MODEC: Add
5. Panalpina To Have EGM to Approve One Share One Vote

1. Yungtay Noises Haven’t Produced a Result Yet

After almost three months of preparation after the initial news came out in October, Hitachi Ltd (6501 JP) launched its Tender Offer for Yungtay Engineering (1507 TT) in mid-January 2019. 

The background of the two companies’ relationship, the board kerfuffle last year, and some detail on the financials and the growth of the Chinese mainland elevator market was discussed extensively in Going Up! Hitachi Tender for Yungtay Engineering (1507 TT)at the end of October. When the Tender Offer was confirmed as launched, additional details were provided in Hitachi Tender for Yungtay Engineering Launches.

Since then, there has been a litany of small “nuisance” events which so far have not resulted in any changes to the terms of the Tender Offer, but keeping a watchful eye is recommended.

2. Kosaido (7868 JP) TOB Extended

As discussed in previous insights, Kosaido Co Ltd (7868 JP) is currently the subject of a TOB (Takeover Bid) by an SPV established by Bain to acquire all the shares outstanding. This has been discussed in three different insights so far.
  ❖ Smallcap Kosaido (7868 JP) Tender Offer: Wrong Price But Whaddya Gonna Do?
  ❖ Kosaido: Activism Drives Price 30+% Through Terms
  ❖ Kosaido TOB: Situation Gets Weird – Activists+Independent Opposition to MBO 

The TOB started as a lowball price TOB with the explanation that the MBO was needed to rehabilitate the printing/information business which makes up three-quarters of consolidated revenue of the company and is the basis upon which the company was founded decades ago.

A read between the lines showed quite quickly that the more ostensible reason for taking the company private was to be able to own 61% of the company which provided the other 25% of consolidated revenue and made up materially all of the operating profit of Kosaido over the past few years. And that business was being bought at just over half of book while the rest of the business was being bought for effectively zero.

My first insight questioned that despite “independent directors” not doing so, and an activist in the form of Yoshiaki Murakami’s firm Reno KK did something about it, quickly buying just under 10% of the company in the two weeks after announcement. On that news, the stock shot up to 30-40% through terms, and fell back, but since it started rising above terms and peaking, it has not fallen below about 15% through terms.

The New News

YESTERDAY, the directors of Kosaido released an amendment to their Statement of Support of the Tender Offer adding a phrase to the effect that “subsequent to the initial meeting where all the statutory auditors had expressed support, at the Board Meeting on the 25th of February, Independent Statutory Auditor Nakatsuji-[san] expressed his opposition to the Tender Offer.” This follows his notice of opposition on the 19th.

TODAY, the Offeror announced an Amendment to the Tender Offer and was extending its Tender Offer by 7 business days – from 30 business days to 37 business days – which has the effect of changing the Closing Date from March 1 to March 12.

With the shares 20% through terms (¥738/share as I write) despite what appears to be no increase by the main activist in the last two weeks, the likelihood retail will tender at ¥610/share this looks like a situation where the deal may fail unless there is a bump.

But it would still be up for grabs. 

3. StubWorld: PCCW Is “Cheap” but Stub Ops Are Deteriorating

This week in StubWorld …

• Select media ops (Free TV and OTT), together with substantial losses booked to other businesses and eliminations, continue to weigh heavily on PCCW Ltd (8 HK)‘s stub ops.

Preceding my comments on PCCW and other stubs are the weekly setup/unwind tables for Asia-Pacific Holdcos.

These relationships trade with a minimum liquidity threshold of US$1mn on a 90-day moving average, and a % market capitalisation threshold – the $ value of the holding/opco held, over the parent’s market capitalisation, expressed in percent – of at least 20%.

4. MODEC: Add

Towards the end of 2018 Modec Inc (6269 JP)‘s share price dropped 46.5% as the price of crude oil also cratered, falling 44.4% . Since that plunge, the stock price has rebounded 53.9% as the company posted excellent results at 4Q and guidance, while conservative, was for continued healthy earnings.

Having visited the company today, we believe earnings should continue to be strong and actually strengthen over the next few years with MODEC likely to start running into capacity constraints over the course of this year.

5. Panalpina To Have EGM to Approve One Share One Vote

Yesterday, Panalpina Welttransport Holding (PWTN SW)‘s largest shareholder with 45.9% of shares out, the Ernst Göhner Foundation, made a formal request to the directors of Panalpina to hold an Extraordinary General Meeting to be held prior to the Annual General Meeting scheduled for early May 2019 so that the Articles of Association be changed – specifically Article 5 – such that the limit on transfer rights and voting rights enshrined in Article 5 be abolished and a “One Share One Vote” structure be adopted.

The directors complied with this request.

The limit to now has been that Shareholders have their votes capped at 5% of shares outstanding EXCEPT FOR the votes of the Ernst Göhner Foundation which were deemed “grandfathered” prior to the change. The directors have the right to grant exceptions to this 5% rule, as discussed in The Panalpina Conundrum a bit over a week ago, but have not, leaving the combined 24+% total held by Cevian and Artisan Partners with only ~11.6% of the vote.

This move by the EGF is both “sneaky” AND interesting (and bullish) news. Given the current shareholder vote structure, it wouldn’t be impossible for the EGF to vote it down in the EGM, but I think EGF very specifically do not want to vote it down because the alternative is worse. But getting this passed would suddenly change the outlook for a Panalpina/Agility deal or any deal which required significant issuance.

In this briefing:

1. Kosaido (7868 JP) TOB Extended
2. StubWorld: PCCW Is “Cheap” but Stub Ops Are Deteriorating
3. MODEC: Add
4. Panalpina To Have EGM to Approve One Share One Vote
5. DSME Perpetual CBs Owned by Korea Eximbank: Situational Assessment & Trade Approach

1. Kosaido (7868 JP) TOB Extended

As discussed in previous insights, Kosaido Co Ltd (7868 JP) is currently the subject of a TOB (Takeover Bid) by an SPV established by Bain to acquire all the shares outstanding. This has been discussed in three different insights so far.
  ❖ Smallcap Kosaido (7868 JP) Tender Offer: Wrong Price But Whaddya Gonna Do?
  ❖ Kosaido: Activism Drives Price 30+% Through Terms
  ❖ Kosaido TOB: Situation Gets Weird – Activists+Independent Opposition to MBO 

The TOB started as a lowball price TOB with the explanation that the MBO was needed to rehabilitate the printing/information business which makes up three-quarters of consolidated revenue of the company and is the basis upon which the company was founded decades ago.

A read between the lines showed quite quickly that the more ostensible reason for taking the company private was to be able to own 61% of the company which provided the other 25% of consolidated revenue and made up materially all of the operating profit of Kosaido over the past few years. And that business was being bought at just over half of book while the rest of the business was being bought for effectively zero.

My first insight questioned that despite “independent directors” not doing so, and an activist in the form of Yoshiaki Murakami’s firm Reno KK did something about it, quickly buying just under 10% of the company in the two weeks after announcement. On that news, the stock shot up to 30-40% through terms, and fell back, but since it started rising above terms and peaking, it has not fallen below about 15% through terms.

The New News

YESTERDAY, the directors of Kosaido released an amendment to their Statement of Support of the Tender Offer adding a phrase to the effect that “subsequent to the initial meeting where all the statutory auditors had expressed support, at the Board Meeting on the 25th of February, Independent Statutory Auditor Nakatsuji-[san] expressed his opposition to the Tender Offer.” This follows his notice of opposition on the 19th.

TODAY, the Offeror announced an Amendment to the Tender Offer and was extending its Tender Offer by 7 business days – from 30 business days to 37 business days – which has the effect of changing the Closing Date from March 1 to March 12.

With the shares 20% through terms (¥738/share as I write) despite what appears to be no increase by the main activist in the last two weeks, the likelihood retail will tender at ¥610/share this looks like a situation where the deal may fail unless there is a bump.

But it would still be up for grabs. 

2. StubWorld: PCCW Is “Cheap” but Stub Ops Are Deteriorating

This week in StubWorld …

• Select media ops (Free TV and OTT), together with substantial losses booked to other businesses and eliminations, continue to weigh heavily on PCCW Ltd (8 HK)‘s stub ops.

Preceding my comments on PCCW and other stubs are the weekly setup/unwind tables for Asia-Pacific Holdcos.

These relationships trade with a minimum liquidity threshold of US$1mn on a 90-day moving average, and a % market capitalisation threshold – the $ value of the holding/opco held, over the parent’s market capitalisation, expressed in percent – of at least 20%.

3. MODEC: Add

Towards the end of 2018 Modec Inc (6269 JP)‘s share price dropped 46.5% as the price of crude oil also cratered, falling 44.4% . Since that plunge, the stock price has rebounded 53.9% as the company posted excellent results at 4Q and guidance, while conservative, was for continued healthy earnings.

Having visited the company today, we believe earnings should continue to be strong and actually strengthen over the next few years with MODEC likely to start running into capacity constraints over the course of this year.

4. Panalpina To Have EGM to Approve One Share One Vote

Yesterday, Panalpina Welttransport Holding (PWTN SW)‘s largest shareholder with 45.9% of shares out, the Ernst Göhner Foundation, made a formal request to the directors of Panalpina to hold an Extraordinary General Meeting to be held prior to the Annual General Meeting scheduled for early May 2019 so that the Articles of Association be changed – specifically Article 5 – such that the limit on transfer rights and voting rights enshrined in Article 5 be abolished and a “One Share One Vote” structure be adopted.

The directors complied with this request.

The limit to now has been that Shareholders have their votes capped at 5% of shares outstanding EXCEPT FOR the votes of the Ernst Göhner Foundation which were deemed “grandfathered” prior to the change. The directors have the right to grant exceptions to this 5% rule, as discussed in The Panalpina Conundrum a bit over a week ago, but have not, leaving the combined 24+% total held by Cevian and Artisan Partners with only ~11.6% of the vote.

This move by the EGF is both “sneaky” AND interesting (and bullish) news. Given the current shareholder vote structure, it wouldn’t be impossible for the EGF to vote it down in the EGM, but I think EGF very specifically do not want to vote it down because the alternative is worse. But getting this passed would suddenly change the outlook for a Panalpina/Agility deal or any deal which required significant issuance.

5. DSME Perpetual CBs Owned by Korea Eximbank: Situational Assessment & Trade Approach

• DSME has this ₩2.3tril worth of CBs that carry a 30 year maturity. Korea Eximbank is the holder. HHI wants no change. Eximbank wants out as soon as possible. Current price of ₩32,600 is nearly a 20% discount to the conversion price of ₩40,350. It’d be still better for Eximbank to do conversion/sale even at this price. This is 27.54%. It will create huge overhang.
• HHI should be given much higher priority than DSME even when they are under the same roof. DSME acquisition is supposed to help HHI first, not the other way around. HHI shouldn’t be much incentivized to help turn around DSME in the short-term. Not only that, pressing down DSME price would probably be the only way for HHI to prevent Eximbank’s stake dumping.
• In a longer time horizon, things would depend on the outlook of the entire shipbuilding sector. To minimize risks, I’d go for long/short with HHI. What should be at least clear at this point is that HHI should be outperforming DSME in whatever fundamentals situations we are dealing with.

In this briefing:

1. StubWorld: PCCW Is “Cheap” but Stub Ops Are Deteriorating
2. MODEC: Add
3. Panalpina To Have EGM to Approve One Share One Vote
4. DSME Perpetual CBs Owned by Korea Eximbank: Situational Assessment & Trade Approach
5. Weekly Oil Views: Crude Rises to 3-Month High but Further Upside May Be Limited

1. StubWorld: PCCW Is “Cheap” but Stub Ops Are Deteriorating

This week in StubWorld …

• Select media ops (Free TV and OTT), together with substantial losses booked to other businesses and eliminations, continue to weigh heavily on PCCW Ltd (8 HK)‘s stub ops.

Preceding my comments on PCCW and other stubs are the weekly setup/unwind tables for Asia-Pacific Holdcos.

These relationships trade with a minimum liquidity threshold of US$1mn on a 90-day moving average, and a % market capitalisation threshold – the $ value of the holding/opco held, over the parent’s market capitalisation, expressed in percent – of at least 20%.

2. MODEC: Add

Towards the end of 2018 Modec Inc (6269 JP)‘s share price dropped 46.5% as the price of crude oil also cratered, falling 44.4% . Since that plunge, the stock price has rebounded 53.9% as the company posted excellent results at 4Q and guidance, while conservative, was for continued healthy earnings.

Having visited the company today, we believe earnings should continue to be strong and actually strengthen over the next few years with MODEC likely to start running into capacity constraints over the course of this year.

3. Panalpina To Have EGM to Approve One Share One Vote

Yesterday, Panalpina Welttransport Holding (PWTN SW)‘s largest shareholder with 45.9% of shares out, the Ernst Göhner Foundation, made a formal request to the directors of Panalpina to hold an Extraordinary General Meeting to be held prior to the Annual General Meeting scheduled for early May 2019 so that the Articles of Association be changed – specifically Article 5 – such that the limit on transfer rights and voting rights enshrined in Article 5 be abolished and a “One Share One Vote” structure be adopted.

The directors complied with this request.

The limit to now has been that Shareholders have their votes capped at 5% of shares outstanding EXCEPT FOR the votes of the Ernst Göhner Foundation which were deemed “grandfathered” prior to the change. The directors have the right to grant exceptions to this 5% rule, as discussed in The Panalpina Conundrum a bit over a week ago, but have not, leaving the combined 24+% total held by Cevian and Artisan Partners with only ~11.6% of the vote.

This move by the EGF is both “sneaky” AND interesting (and bullish) news. Given the current shareholder vote structure, it wouldn’t be impossible for the EGF to vote it down in the EGM, but I think EGF very specifically do not want to vote it down because the alternative is worse. But getting this passed would suddenly change the outlook for a Panalpina/Agility deal or any deal which required significant issuance.

4. DSME Perpetual CBs Owned by Korea Eximbank: Situational Assessment & Trade Approach

• DSME has this ₩2.3tril worth of CBs that carry a 30 year maturity. Korea Eximbank is the holder. HHI wants no change. Eximbank wants out as soon as possible. Current price of ₩32,600 is nearly a 20% discount to the conversion price of ₩40,350. It’d be still better for Eximbank to do conversion/sale even at this price. This is 27.54%. It will create huge overhang.
• HHI should be given much higher priority than DSME even when they are under the same roof. DSME acquisition is supposed to help HHI first, not the other way around. HHI shouldn’t be much incentivized to help turn around DSME in the short-term. Not only that, pressing down DSME price would probably be the only way for HHI to prevent Eximbank’s stake dumping.
• In a longer time horizon, things would depend on the outlook of the entire shipbuilding sector. To minimize risks, I’d go for long/short with HHI. What should be at least clear at this point is that HHI should be outperforming DSME in whatever fundamentals situations we are dealing with.

5. Weekly Oil Views: Crude Rises to 3-Month High but Further Upside May Be Limited

Another week of US-China negotiations and another big boost to market sentiment. Stock markets as well as crude rallied last week on the back of news from Washington that the US and China were preparing to sign a framework deal in the form of several MoUs covering trade and structural issues.

But there are other economic concerns around the globe, and a preliminary deal between the US and China is not going to curb all the headwinds. Further upside to crude may also be limited because much of the anticipated rapprochement between the two countries has already been factored in. WTI prices stabilising well above the $50/barrel threshold are also likely to support strong growth in US production, which hit the 12 million b/d mark last week.

Nonetheless, there are factors on the supply front that could trigger a spike beyond $70/barrel for Brent, especially if combined with a turnaround in economic and oil demand growth expectations.

If that happens, we believe the Saudis will ease up on over-compliance with their own production cuts, either voluntarily or under renewed pressure from US President Donald Trump.

In this briefing:

1. MODEC: Add
2. Panalpina To Have EGM to Approve One Share One Vote
3. DSME Perpetual CBs Owned by Korea Eximbank: Situational Assessment & Trade Approach
4. Weekly Oil Views: Crude Rises to 3-Month High but Further Upside May Be Limited
5. Hopewell’s Egregiously Bad Offer, But What Can You Do?

1. MODEC: Add

Towards the end of 2018 Modec Inc (6269 JP)‘s share price dropped 46.5% as the price of crude oil also cratered, falling 44.4% . Since that plunge, the stock price has rebounded 53.9% as the company posted excellent results at 4Q and guidance, while conservative, was for continued healthy earnings.

Having visited the company today, we believe earnings should continue to be strong and actually strengthen over the next few years with MODEC likely to start running into capacity constraints over the course of this year.

2. Panalpina To Have EGM to Approve One Share One Vote

Yesterday, Panalpina Welttransport Holding (PWTN SW)‘s largest shareholder with 45.9% of shares out, the Ernst Göhner Foundation, made a formal request to the directors of Panalpina to hold an Extraordinary General Meeting to be held prior to the Annual General Meeting scheduled for early May 2019 so that the Articles of Association be changed – specifically Article 5 – such that the limit on transfer rights and voting rights enshrined in Article 5 be abolished and a “One Share One Vote” structure be adopted.

The directors complied with this request.

The limit to now has been that Shareholders have their votes capped at 5% of shares outstanding EXCEPT FOR the votes of the Ernst Göhner Foundation which were deemed “grandfathered” prior to the change. The directors have the right to grant exceptions to this 5% rule, as discussed in The Panalpina Conundrum a bit over a week ago, but have not, leaving the combined 24+% total held by Cevian and Artisan Partners with only ~11.6% of the vote.

This move by the EGF is both “sneaky” AND interesting (and bullish) news. Given the current shareholder vote structure, it wouldn’t be impossible for the EGF to vote it down in the EGM, but I think EGF very specifically do not want to vote it down because the alternative is worse. But getting this passed would suddenly change the outlook for a Panalpina/Agility deal or any deal which required significant issuance.

3. DSME Perpetual CBs Owned by Korea Eximbank: Situational Assessment & Trade Approach

• DSME has this ₩2.3tril worth of CBs that carry a 30 year maturity. Korea Eximbank is the holder. HHI wants no change. Eximbank wants out as soon as possible. Current price of ₩32,600 is nearly a 20% discount to the conversion price of ₩40,350. It’d be still better for Eximbank to do conversion/sale even at this price. This is 27.54%. It will create huge overhang.
• HHI should be given much higher priority than DSME even when they are under the same roof. DSME acquisition is supposed to help HHI first, not the other way around. HHI shouldn’t be much incentivized to help turn around DSME in the short-term. Not only that, pressing down DSME price would probably be the only way for HHI to prevent Eximbank’s stake dumping.
• In a longer time horizon, things would depend on the outlook of the entire shipbuilding sector. To minimize risks, I’d go for long/short with HHI. What should be at least clear at this point is that HHI should be outperforming DSME in whatever fundamentals situations we are dealing with.

4. Weekly Oil Views: Crude Rises to 3-Month High but Further Upside May Be Limited

Another week of US-China negotiations and another big boost to market sentiment. Stock markets as well as crude rallied last week on the back of news from Washington that the US and China were preparing to sign a framework deal in the form of several MoUs covering trade and structural issues.

But there are other economic concerns around the globe, and a preliminary deal between the US and China is not going to curb all the headwinds. Further upside to crude may also be limited because much of the anticipated rapprochement between the two countries has already been factored in. WTI prices stabilising well above the $50/barrel threshold are also likely to support strong growth in US production, which hit the 12 million b/d mark last week.

Nonetheless, there are factors on the supply front that could trigger a spike beyond $70/barrel for Brent, especially if combined with a turnaround in economic and oil demand growth expectations.

If that happens, we believe the Saudis will ease up on over-compliance with their own production cuts, either voluntarily or under renewed pressure from US President Donald Trump.

5. Hopewell’s Egregiously Bad Offer, But What Can You Do?

The Scheme Document for the privatisation of Hopewell Holdings (54 HK) has been dispatched. The court meeting will be held on the 21 March. The consideration will be paid (on or before) the 14 May.  The IFA (China Tonghai Capital) considers the $38.80/share Offer to be fair & reasonable. The Scheme is conditional on ≥75% for, ≤10% against from disinterested shareholders. As Hopewell is HK-incorporated, there is no “head count ” test.  The full timetable is as follows:

After hearing conflicting opinions on what constitutes a blocking stake, a chat with the banker confirmed the blocking stake, as per the Companies Ordinance, is tied to 63.07% of shares out (i.e. Scheme shareholders – see page 95); whereas the Takeovers Code is tied to 59.42% of shares out. Effectively there are two assessments on the blocking stake and the more stringent (the 59.42% out in this case) prevails. 

With the Offer Price representing a 43% discount to NAV, wider than the largest discount precedent in past nine years (the Glorious Property (845 HK) offer, which incidentally was voted down), the IFA creatively argues that extenuating factors such as the premium to historical price needs to also be taken into account. Hardly original, but that is where investors must decide whether this is as good as it’s going to get – given the Wu family’s control, there will not be a competing offer – or to hold out for a superior price longer term. This is a final offer and it will not be increased.

What the IFA fails to discuss is that the widest successful discount to NAV privatisation was 29.4% for New World China Land (917 HK) in 2016. And all precedent transactions (successful or otherwise) are PRC (mainly) property development related; except for Wheelock which operated property in Hong Kong (like Hopewell) and in Singapore, which was privatised at a 12.1% discount to NAV.

Therein lies the dilemma – what is a fair and reasonable discount to NAV for a Hong Kong investment property play? With limited precedents, it is challenging to categorically reach an opinion. And that is the disingenuous conclusion from the IFA that the premium to last close and with reference to historical pricing, is in effect the overriding reason to conclude the Offer is reasonable. I would argue the Wu family has made a low-ball offer for what is essentially an investment property play with quantifiable asset value.

A blocking sake is 5.9% or 51.6mn shares. First Eagle, which recently voted down the Guoco Group Ltd (53 HK) privatisation that was pitched at a ~25% discount to NAV, holds 2.7% (according to CapIQ).

Trading at a wide gross/annualised return of 7%/37.5%, reflecting the risk to completion, and the significant downside should the scheme be voted down. Tough one – the premium to last close and with reference to the 10-year price performance, should be sufficient to get it over the line, and the basis for this “bullish” insight. But only for the brave.