Event-Driven

In this briefing:

1. Last Week in Event SPACE: Rakuten/Lyft, Delta, Kosaido, Ophir, Dairy Crest, Panalpina, BGF
2. Saputo to Buy Dairy Crest; Initial Market Response Wants a Bump
3. Will Rakuten Get A Near-Term Lyft?
4. Doosan E&C Rights Offer: Conditions & Timetable
5. DHICO (Doosan Heavy) Rights Offer: Conditions & Timetable

1. Last Week in Event SPACE: Rakuten/Lyft, Delta, Kosaido, Ophir, Dairy Crest, Panalpina, BGF

Last Week in Event SPACE …

• The question mark over the size of Rakuten Inc (4755 JP)‘s stake in Lyft may be known in the coming two weeks.
• Delta Electronics Thai (DELTA TB)‘s Tender Off document fails to clarify how the FY18 dividend will be treated.
• An activist has come forward, and the external statutory auditor and lead shareholder (wife of founder) are against the offer, but Kosaido Co Ltd (7868 JP) situation still fits pretty cleanly in the “Too Hard” bucket for now.
• Ophir Energy (OPHR LN)‘s shareholders ratchet up their opposition to Medco Energi Internasional T (MEDC IJ)‘s Offer.
• A bump seems envisaged against an already healthy price, but it may not need be a big one to get the Dairy Crest (DCG LN) deal done.
  
• DSV A/S (DSV DC)‘s Offer either comes down to price, or it comes down to loyalty to Panalpina Welttransport Holding (PWTN SW)‘s management.
• The BGF Co Ltd (027410 KS) set up trade has provided a decent return recently, but could still run further.
• Plus CCASS movements and expected upcoming events for key M&A transactions.

(This insight covers specific insights & comments involving Stubs, Pairs, Arbitrage, share Classification and Events – or SPACE – in the past week)

Rakuten Inc (4755 JP) (Mkt Cap: $10.2bn; Liquidity: $51mn)

Since announcing its foray into the deeper waters of being the fourth Type I Mobile Network Operator in Japan, Rakuten’s shares have taken a mighty hit. But the focus in this insight is on ride-sharing company Lyft. In March 2015, Rakuten CEO Hiroshi Mikitani announced that Rakuten had invested US$300mn in Lyft, giving it a 11.9% stake after Series E round in May 2015. Recent articles suggest that Rakuten remains the top investor.

• As best as Travis Lundy can tell, from sources who track this, Rakuten is the single largest shareholder in Lyft, with a holding in the 10.4-12.0% range. That would suggest a position value of US$900mn-$1.2bn based on the last funding round in June 2018. At a $25bn pre-money IPO valuation, that would be worth US$1.5-2.0bn for a likely pre-tax IPO uplift of US$590-800mn. 
• A report late Thursday Asia time suggested the Lyft roadshow would start the week of March 18th, which would mean the S-1 will be available two weeks before that. Investors will know more about Rakuten’s ownership of Lyft by the end of next week or very early the following week. Travis would want to be long for now.

(link to Travis’ insight: Will Rakuten Get A Near-Term Lyft?) 

Doosan Heavy Industries (034020 KS) (Mkt Cap: $868mn; Liquidity: $78.5mn)
Doosan Engineering & Construction (011160 KS) (Mkt Cap: $91mn; Liquidity: $0.4mn)

DHICO announced a larger-than-expected ₩608.4bn rights offer. ₩543bn is expected to be raised through common shares at a preliminary price of ₩6,390; and ₩65bn via RCPS at a preliminary price of ₩6,970. This is a combined 72.56% capital increase a 42.05% share dilution. Concurrently, Doosan E&C announced a ₩420bn rights offer at a preliminary price of ₩1,255, a 15% discount to last close.

• For DHICO, Mar 27 is the ex-rights day for both Common and RCPS. Subscription rights (for the Common) will be listed and trade on Apr 19~25. May 2 is final pricing. May 8 is subscription and May 16 is payment. New Common shares will be listed on May 29.
• For E&C, the final price will be fixed on Apr 30. Whichever is higher – ₩1,255 or Apr 26~30 VWAP at a 40% discount – will be the final offering price. Mar 27 will be the ex-rights day. Subscription rights will be listed and traded on Apr 18~24. New shares will be listed on May 24.
• ₩1,255 is a lot more aggressive than generally viewed. DHICO owns nearly two thirds of E&C. With a 20% oversubscription, nearly ₩300bn will likely come from DHICO, essentially buttressing E&C at an even heftier price. Which is probably why the market is being less harsh on E&C relative to DHICO.

link to Sanghyun Park‘s insights:
Doosan E&C Rights Offer: Conditions & Timetable
DHICO (Doosan Heavy) Rights Offer: Conditions & Timetable.

Delta Electronics Thai (DELTA TB) (Mkt Cap: $2.8bn; Liquidity: $3mn)

The 247-4 Form is out with a tender offer period between 26 Feb-1 April, and payment on the 4th April. The frustrating part is how Delta’s FY18 dividend of Bt2.30 is treated. On one hand, it says the Bt71 Offer price is final unless there is a MAC. Further into the Offer doc, it mentions the Offeror “reserves the right” to reduce the offer price if a dividend is paid. DELTA’s IR believes the dividend will be added, but it is not crystal clear.

• Furthermore, there is no minimum acceptance condition, as potentially flagged earlier, which means there is no possibility of fast-tracking payment. Some precedent voluntary offers included a minimum acceptance, which provides an expedited payment should investors who tender shares AND revoke their right to withdraw – provided that minimum is fulfilled.
• Shares traded up after the document came out, shrugging off the ambiguity in the document. Currently trading at a gross/annualised return of 1.1%/11%. The dividend is subject to a 10% tax for non-residents.

(link to my insight: Delta Thailand’s Tender Offer: Updated Timetable)

M1 Ltd (M1 SP) (Mkt Cap: $1.4bn; Liquidity: $3mn)

The previous Friday, the Offerors for M1 announced that their Offer had been declared Unconditional In All Respects as the tendered amount was 57.04% and the total held by concert parties was 76.35%. Axiata Group (AXIATA MK) made an announcement to the Bursa Malaysia that it had accepted the Offer as required because it was a significant asset disposal. Going unconditional has triggered an extension of the Closing Date to 4 March 2019.

• If you want to fight this with an appraisal, you can. Travis doesn’t see the point. If you want to hold on to the stock in order to block full squeezeout and play chicken with the big boys, you can, but it requires a relatively big ticket (roughly 6.73% of the shares out). 
• So Travis recommends taking the money. It was better to take the money in early January and re-deploy, rather than wait for the close of the offer. He would accept now and sees no upside from waiting.

(link to Travis’ insight: M1 Offer Unconditional as Axiata Tenders)

Kosaido Co Ltd (7868 JP) (Mkt Cap: $160mn; Liquidity: $1mn)

When the Tender Offer / MBO for Kosaido was announced last month, Travis’ first reaction was that this was wrong, concluding this was a virtual asset strip in progress, and suggested that the only way this was likely to not get done is if some brave activist came forward.

• Shortly afterwards, an activist did come forward. Yoshiaki Murakami’s bought 5% through his entity Reno KK, and later lifted his stake (combined with affiliates) to 9.55%. Travis thought the stock had run too far at that point (¥775/share). While still cheap, he did not expect Bain to lift its price by 30+%, nor a white knight to arrive quickly enough. 
• This week a media article suggested longstanding external statutory auditor Mr. Nakatsuji and lead shareholder Sakurai Mie were against the takeover.
• The possibility this deal fails because the “put protection” of the deal price at ¥610 is no longer solid has gone up. Conversely, the probability that Bain and the MBO have to come in with a price adjustment higher has gone up. Travis is inclined to remain bearish in the medium-term as there is a significant likelihood there is no alternative solution during the Tender Offer period itself. 

(link to Travis’ insight: Kosaido TOB (7868 JP) Situation Gets Weird – Activists and Independent Opposition to an MBO)

Briefly …

• After announcing earlier this month a number of indicative non-binding bids were received for a “whole of company transaction”, the AFR is now reporting (paywalled) that Lone Star has also joined the battle for Aveo Group (AOG AU). (A Case for Privatising Aveo)
• Xingfa Aluminium (98 HK) announced both China Lesso Group Holdings (2128 HK) (26.3% shareholder) and Sure Keen (11.5%, ED Liao Yuqing’s vehicle), collectively holding  37.81% of shares out, will NOT tender their shares into the offer. (Guangxin Reloads A Peculiar Low-Ball Offer For Xingfa Aluminium)

Dairy Crest (DCG LN) (Mkt Cap: $1.3bn; Liquidity: $4.5mn)

Saputo Inc (SAP CN) and Dairy Crest announced an all-cash deal where Saputo will buy Dairy Crest for 620p/share, to be implemented through a Scheme of Arrangement with an expected close in Q2 2019. This appears to tick all the necessary boxes. Friendly, horizontal integration, and limited job losses. Shares are trading through terms early (he published at 628.5p), perhaps on expectations the wide open register means shareholders can try to hold out for a higher price.

• At almost 14x EV/EBITDA on a TTM basis and a bit lower on a March 2019 FY-end basis, it is a high enough multiple to not be insulting for a dairy company, and may keep other suitors away.
• Dairy Crest’s directors have given irrevocable notice to accept, and the directors’ advisors (Greenhill & Co) have deemed the Offer “fair and reasonable.”
• One extra turn of EV/EBITDA would lift the takeover price just under 10%. That would clear out most of the naysayers who bought in the frothier “we’re going to be an asset-light branded goods company” days of 2015-2017.  Doable, but as it is an agreed deal, Travis doesn’t see the need to push it. 

(link to Travis’ insight: Saputo to Buy Crest Dairy; Initial Market Response Wants a Bump)

Ophir Energy (OPHR LN) (Mkt Cap: $509mn; Liquidity: $6mn)

Petrus Advisors (3.5% shareholder) has dialed up the pressure on its opposition to Medco Energi Internasional T (MEDC IJ)‘s £0.55/share offer for Ophir Energy (OPHR LN), specifically calling into question Bill Schrader’s (Ophir’s Chairman) business acumen.

• In its prior letter to Ophir on the 14 January, Petrus recommended selling the South-East Asian (SEA) assets to Medco, with a low-end fair value, before synergies, of £0.64/share, through to £1.42/share on a blue sky basis. It also argued that Ophir should negotiate with the Equatorial Guinea ministry (the regulator that terminated the Fortuna license, resulting in write-offs of US$610mn) to be compensated for its $700mn investment and the unfair seizure of the license, otherwise it would set a precedent for other international operators doing business in EG.
• Petrus has now rounded on Schrader over perceived mismanagement of the EG licence, and a lack of professionalism in not soliciting and considering offers for Ophir from other buyers. Petrus’ beef is not an outlier –  alternative hedge fund Sand Grove has increased its exposure, via cash-settled derivatives, to 17.28% (as at 13 February); while Ian Hannam, who advised Ophir’s board on its 2013 right issue, is understood to have also written to Ophir’s interim CEO Alan Booth and the board saying Medco’s offer is too low.
• Overall, Petrus’ assertions that Ophir is being sold at “sub optimal terms” appear valid, most notably on the EG compensation and the illogical operations update earlier this month. The alternative push to sell the SEA assets separately, as that has been Medco’s core focus, not international operations, also makes sense.

(link to my insight: Petrus Doubles Down On Ophir Energy)

Panalpina Welttransport Holding (PWTN SW) (Mkt Cap: $3.7bn; Liquidity: $22mn)

Last month, DSV A/S (DSV DC) made a public proposal of a takeover for cash and scrip valued at CHF 170/share, which came at a 24% premium to last and +31% vs 1-month VWAP. The #2, #3, and long-time #4 shareholders are firmly and publicly in the camp of trying to get something done.  45.9%-shareholder Ernst Göhner Foundation is sending mixed signals – do they want a higher price? Or do they want to wait and let Panalpina grow by its own consolidator strategy?

• Panalpina has now confirmed that it in preliminary talks with Kuwait-listed logistics company Agility Public Warehouse. A Bloomberg report suggested a deal could be reached as early as this past week for Agility’s logistics business. The same article suggested the Göhner Foundation is supportive of the new talks. Agility’s press release was much more non-committal.
• DSV has also announced a new all cash CHF 180/share offer for Panalpina; although the original cash and scrip offer was then worth CHF 184.5/share, which is an even better premium to pre-offer terms. One wonders whether cash-only would suit the Foundation; the DSV press release seemed to respond to that.
• It is not clear what would drive the Foundation to give up its control. And Panalpina’s measly share price reaction to the all-cash offer suggest there is considerable skepticism out there. But at some price, Panalpina’s board looks pretty stupid to not accept the cash.
• If you do not think a deal with DSV has any chance of getting up, Panalpina shares are a sell here. If they overpay for Agility and cannot improve their own margins well past historical highs in a market trending weaker, then the shares could drop. 

(link to Travis’ insight: The Panalpina Conundrum)

Mahindra & Mahindra (MM IN) 

Curtis Lehnert backs out a discount to NAV of 42%, the widest since at least 2015. His proposal to structure the trade is to use a market-cap weighted hedge on the two largest listed subsidiaries, Tech Mahindra (TECHM IN) and Mahindra & Mahindra Fin Services Ltd. (MMFS IN) along with a core business hedge using Maruti Suzuki India (MSIL IN) to hedge the core automotive business. 

• Using Curtis’ figures, the implied stub is at its lowest level since a brief downward spike in February 2015, and you would have to go back to April 2014 to find a lower level.
• The push back on this setup is that the auto operations have recorded marginally, yet sequential profit declines in FY16 and FY17; while recording three sequential quarterly declines up to December 2018. The big question is whether Mahindra can regain market share as it kick-starts a new model cycle.

(link to Curtis’ insight: TRADE IDEA – Mahindra & Mahindra (MM IN) Stub: Rise)

BGF Co Ltd (027410 KS) / Bgf Retail (282330 KS)

On January 8th, Douglas Kim initiated a setup trade of going long BGF Co and going short BGF Retail. (Korean Stubs Spotlight: A Pair Trade Between BGF Co. & BGF Retail) This setup has worked out well (7.5% return) and he now think this is a good time to close the trade.

• In contrast, Sanghyun believes the Holdco is still undervalued relative to the Sub by about 10%. Plugging in Sanghyun’s numbers, I back out a discount to NAV of 45% against a one-year average of 30%, with a 12-month range of -51.5% to 15.5% (premium).

links to:
Douglas’ insight: Korean Stubs Spotlight: Close the Pair Trade Between BGF Co. & BGF Retail
Sanghyun’s insight: BGF Duo Stub Trade: Short Sub / Long Holdco with a Very Short-Term Horizon

Can One Bhd (CAN MK) / Kian Joo Can Factory (KJC MK)

Back on the 13 December 2018, Can One announced a proposed MGO for Kian Joo at RM3.10/share, a 52.7% premium to last close. This required Can One shareholders’ approval which was received on the 14 February. Can One’s current 33% stake in Kian Joo accounts for ~86% of its market cap. The offer doc should be out, on or before the 7 March, with payment either late March (along with the first close of the Offer), or early April, depending on when the offer turns unconditional. The offer is conditional on 50% acceptance. Both sides are illiquid.

• This looks like a decent exit for Kian Joo shareholders. Apart from EPF with 10.1%, former NED Teow China See is the only other shareholder with >5% with 8.9%.
• For Can One, this is an aggressive pitch to make Kian Joo a subsidiary amidst an uncertain economic backdrop, while potential synergies may be offset via higher interest costs.

(link to my insight: StubWorld: Can One’s Offer For Kian Joo Can; Mahindra At Possible Set-Up Levels)

Briefly …

• Sanghyun recommended long Hansae Yes24 Holdings Co, Ltd. (016450 KS), short Hansae Co Ltd (105630 KS), now that the Holdco/Sub ratio  is at -227% of σ or a 120D low. Using his numbers, I see the discount to NAV at 49% against a one-year average of 44%; while the implied stub is at a one-year low. (link to Sanghyun’s insight: Hansae Holdco/Sub Trade: Huge Divergence Now, Sub Price Rally Should Be Resisted Here)

Hyundai Glovis (086280 KS) / Hyundai Mobis (012330 KS)

There are still two schools of thought on the HMG restructuring. One is that Glovis/Mobis are merged into a holdco entity. Or Glovis becomes the holdco with Mobis→ HM→ Kia Motors Corp (000270 KS) below. Since late 3Q18, there has been increased speculation on the latter. This has pushed up Glovis’ price relative to Mobis.

• Each outcome is beset with its own set of issues. For Glovis to be the sole holdco, it has to come up with nearly ₩2tn to buy Kia’s Mobis stake, probably through new, and burdensome, debt.  Glovis may also face the risk of forced holdco conversion, creating an issue with Kia as a “great grandson” subsidiary.
• This speculation pushing up Glovis relative to Mobis has yet to be substantiated/justified, suggesting Glovis is overbought. Sanghyun expects a mean reversion, and recommends a long Mobis and short Glovis.

(link to Sanghyun’s insight: Glovis/Mobis Pair Trade: Glovis Being Overpriced Relative to Mobis on Unsubstantiated Speculation)

• Navitas Ltd (NVT AU) has agreed to extend the exclusivity period granted to the BGH consortium to 1 March (from 18 Feb), in order to allow additional time for BGH to complete a limited set of remaining due diligence investigations.

• Hopewell Holdings (54 HK) and the Offeror are still in the course of finalising the information to be included in the Scheme Document. No date for the dispatch has been announced.

• ESR’s offer for Propertylink Group (PLG AU) has turned unconditional after Centuria Capital (CNI AU) tendered. 

• The composite doc for Harbin Electric Co Ltd H (1133 HK), initially due out this past week, has been further postponed until the 29 March – on or before – ostensibly to incorporate the FY18 financials.

• Netcomm Wireless (NTC AU) has received $1.10 cash offer (53% premium to last close) from Casa Systems (CASA US) via a Scheme.  The deal values Netcomm at ~US$114m. The scheme is subject to FIRB and shareholder approval. Stewart David Paul James, a NED,  holds 12.3% and is the major shareholder. The announcement states that each Netcomm director intends to vote the Netcomm shares held by them in favour of the scheme – subject to a +ve IFA opinion and in the absence of a competing offer. This includes Stewart’s stake.

• MYOB Group Ltd (MYO AU) announced no superior proposal emerged after concluding its ’go shop’ period for rival offers to KKR’s takeover proposal.  At a gross/annualised spread of 0.9%/4.8%, assuming early May payment, this looks to be trading a bit tight.

My ongoing series flags large moves (~10%) in CCASS holdings over the past week or so, moves which are often outside normal market transactions.  These may be indicative of share pledges.  Or potential takeovers. Or simply help understand volume swings. 

Often these moves can easily be explained – the placement of new shares, rights issue, movements subsequent to a takeover, amongst others. For those mentioned below, I could not find an obvious reason for the CCASS move.   

2. Saputo to Buy Dairy Crest; Initial Market Response Wants a Bump

Saputo Inc (SAP CN) and Dairy Crest (DCG LN) today announced an all-cash deal where Saputo will buy Dairy Crest for 620p/share, to be implemented through a Scheme of Arrangement which the two parties say is likely to close in Q2 2019.

Saputo is a Canada-listed dairy company which has grown through serial acquisition – more than 30 acquisitions in the last twenty years – but curiously none of the acquisitions have left it with any operations in the UK. Dairy Crest is a leading UK-based dairy and cooking staples company whose best-known products are Cathedral City Cheddar Cheese, Clover margarine, Country Life butter, and Frylight cooking oil as well as other minor butter-similars and butter-replacement spreads.

This would be Saputo’s largest purchase in ten years – by a factor of three over their second largest – the purchase of Warrnambool Cheese & Butter Factory in Q1 2014.

Shares are trading through terms early, perhaps on expectations the wide open register means shareholders can try to hold out for a higher price. 

At a decent premium (13.9x TTM EV/EBITDA at 620p) to where the rest of the smaller-cap dairy products sector trades (below 10x on a median basis), and the highest EV/Revenue or EV/EBITDA multiple that I can find Saputo having paid, asking for more may not get you more, but investors clearly think it worth a try. 

An extra 10% would clear out most of the naysayers who bought in the frothier “we’re going to be an asset-light branded goods company” days of 2015-2017. It would put March 2019 PER at just under 20x and just under 13.9x March 2019 expected EV/EBITDA.

3. Will Rakuten Get A Near-Term Lyft?

Rakuten Inc (4755 JP) is much in the news for many reasons – one of which being a plunge into the deeper waters of being the fourth Type I Mobile Network Operator in Japan, having officially applied for the license in February 2018 and seeing it approved in April.  – the license for which it applied a year ago, with approval received in April 2018. The goal has been to use its initial foray into the MVNO business where it has more than 1.5 million users, and increase its footprint to attract some of its 100+mm Rakuten IDs, 7mm Rakuten Bank accountholders, 3mm Rakuten Securities accountholders, so that it can increase the LTV (LifeTimeValue) of its existing customer base. 

The goal is to introduce service this year (also a requirement of the terms of its license), growing steadily to have 15mm subs in 10 years. The estimated hardware spend is said to be ¥600-700bn on base stations and equipment, initially concentrating on areas in and around mass transit stations in urban areas such as Tokyo and Osaka, and then expand outward. The company has signed deals with numerous partners in electricity distribution such as Tokyo Electric Power Co (9501 JP), Chubu Electric Power Co (9502 JP), and Kansai Electric Power Co (9503 JP) to install transmission equipment on these companies’ power poles and other infrastructure.

The shares have suffered mightily since the plan came to light in mid-December 2015, underperforming the TOPIX Info & Communications Sector Index by more than 20% in the fourteen months through yesterday. The sharp drop on the left hand side of the chart was a two-day sell-a-thon by investors convinced the company was about to waste billions of dollars. The Info & Communications Sector Index also dropped sharply on that day on fears that a fourth entrant with a declared goal of dropping monthly charges by 40% would increase churn at the existing Big Three (NTT Docomo Inc (9437 JP), Softbank Corp (9434 JP), and KDDI Corp (9433 JP)) and possibly cause a price war. The shares dropped from about ¥1140 to ¥1020/share, and then slid another 30-odd percent in the next six months to ¥700/share.

The shares have rebounded, fell back in autumn general market weakness, rebounded a tie-up on payments with KDDI announced Nov1 and decent Q3 numbes announced less than 2 weeks later, got crushed in the sharp global selloff in November and December, then had a v-shaped rebound at the start of 2019. 

At the end of January Rakuten Mobile Network received blanket licenses to transmit on 1.7Ghz in the major regions  covering Tokyo, Kyoto, Osaka, Nagoya and Yokohama from the local Bureaus of Communication, and expects to receive others soon. Last week, Rakuten reported full-year earnings through end-December with revenues up 16.6%yoy to just over ¥1.1 trillion, OP (IFRS) at ¥170.4bn, and Net Income at ¥142bn and on the same day announced Nokia had been granted the contract to deploy a turnkey solution as had been previously tested and speculated. 

There are numerous telecom and retailing experts publishing on Smartkarma who have more expertise on Rakuten’s telecom plans and their plans to compete harder against Amazon Japan and Yahoo Japan and others in the e-tailing space. 

I am not going to pretend to their level of knowledge on telecom or retailing (I found Kirk Boodry’s piece on the upcoming 5G allocations in March to be particularly informative) but I will note that Rakuten has a) the ability to borrow against the hardware and licenses, b) can roll out hardware quarter-by-quarter, and c) the KDDI/Rakuten deal is important. In it, KDDI will give Rakuten access to its nationwide roaming network, and Rakuten will provide KDDI with expertise on mobile payments – especially relevant as KDDI is now building out au Financial as briefly discussed here. 

But There is More NewsFlow To Come, And THAT is Interesting

In March 2015, Rakuten CEO Hiroshi Mikitani announced that Rakuten had invested US$300mm in a then just-become-unicorn ride-sharing company called Lyft Inc (0812823D US), which at the end of the Series E round in May 2015 would leave it with ~11.9% of the company at a ~US$2.4-2.5bn post-money valuation. Recent articles suggest that Rakuten remains the top investor (though a WSJ article 2 weeks ago noted there would be golden shares. Hiroshi Mikitani remains a board member of Lyft.

That becomes important as by all accounts I can find (much more detail below), Rakuten continued investing in the four subsequent funding rounds through last summer, leaving the company as the largest single shareholder in Lyft as it prepares for its IPO later this spring. Lyft confidentially filed its IPO paperwork (a “draft S-1”) with the SEC in early December 2018, leaping ahead of Uber in the race to IPO first so the much larger Uber valuation doesn’t block Lyft’s chances for raising funds.

Reuters carried an article Thursday night Asia time saying Lyft planned to start its roadshow the week of March 18th, with an expected valuation of US$20-25 billion, and the first-mover advantage would allow Lyft to set the metrics it wants to use upon which to be judged and priced (if it waited, it would have to be compared to Uber). That could mean more emphasis on the company’s strong suite of self-driving partnerships (drive.ai, Ford, GM, Jaguar, Nutonomy, Waymo, others). A March 18th roadshow would require a full S-1 filing two weeks prior to that.

A successful IPO story based on picking up market share (reportedly doubled to 28% by end-2018 vs end-2016) might make Rakuten’s other investments look good too (Rakuten led Series B, C, D, and E funding for Spanish-language ride-hailing app cabify from 2014-2018 (and reportedly pushed cabify to merge with Lyft last year) and has invested in multiple rounds in SE Asian version GoJek.

The runup to this IPO and the clarity a filing could provide on ownership could provide a near-term fillip to Rakuten’s share price. 

4. Doosan E&C Rights Offer: Conditions & Timetable

• Doosan E&C’s rights offer is pretty much in line with the street’s initial expectation. They raise an estimated ₩420bil at an offer price of ₩1,255. The recently amended KRX rule allows an issuer to freely set an offer price. They set it at ₩1,255 based on the Feb 13~20 prices with a 15% discount.
• Final price will be fixed on Apr 30. Whichever higher of ₩1,255 or Apr 26~30 VWAP at a 40% discount will be a final offering price. So, offering price must be at least ₩1,255. Mar 27 will be the ex-rights day. Subscription rights will be listed and traded on Apr 18~24. New shares will be listed on May 24.
• ₩1,255 is a lot more aggressive than generally viewed. DHICO owns nearly two thirds of E&C stake. With a 20% oversubscription, nearly ₩300bil will likely come from DHICO. This is like DHICO is helping E&C at an even heftier price. This is why the market is being much softer on E&C relative to DHICO.

5. DHICO (Doosan Heavy) Rights Offer: Conditions & Timetable

• This is a total ₩608.4bil rights offer. This is larger than initially expected. A projected ₩543bil will be raised through common share issuance. The other ₩65bil will be raised in the form of RCPS. This is a combined 72.56% capital increase with a 42.05% share dilution.
• 80% will be allocated to the stockholders. Per share allocation for the stockholders is 0.58. Mar 27 is the ex-rights day for both Common and RCPS. Subscription rights will be listed and trade on Apr 19~25 only for Common. May 2 is for final pricing. New Common shares will be listed on May 29.
• Offering size is much larger than initially expected. In the short-term, DHICO shares will likely take a harsh beating. At this point, we’d better stay away from it for now.

In this briefing:

1. Saputo to Buy Crest Dairy; Initial Market Response Wants a Bump
2. Will Rakuten Get A Near-Term Lyft?
3. Doosan E&C Rights Offer: Conditions & Timetable
4. DHICO (Doosan Heavy) Rights Offer: Conditions & Timetable
5. GrainCorp (GNC AU): Pressure Mounts, Diminishing the Prospects of a Bump to the LTAP Bid

1. Saputo to Buy Crest Dairy; Initial Market Response Wants a Bump

Saputo Inc (SAP CN) and Dairy Crest (DCG LN) today announced an all-cash deal where Saputo will buy Dairy Crest for 620p/share, to be implemented through a Scheme of Arrangement which the two parties say is likely to close in Q2 2019.

Saputo is a Canada-listed dairy company which has grown through serial acquisition – more than 30 acquisitions in the last twenty years – but curiously none of the acquisitions have left it with any operations in the UK. Dairy Crest is a leading UK-based dairy and cooking staples company whose best-known products are Cathedral City Cheddar Cheese, Clover margarine, Country Life butter, and Frylight cooking oil as well as other minor butter-similars and butter-replacement spreads.

This would be Saputo’s largest purchase in ten years – by a factor of three over their second largest – the purchase of Warrnambool Cheese & Butter Factory in Q1 2014.

Shares are trading through terms early, perhaps on expectations the wide open register means shareholders can try to hold out for a higher price. 

At a decent premium (13.9x TTM EV/EBITDA at 620p) to where the rest of the smaller-cap dairy products sector trades (below 10x on a median basis), and the highest EV/Revenue or EV/EBITDA multiple that I can find Saputo having paid, asking for more may not get you more, but investors clearly think it worth a try. 

An extra 10% would clear out most of the naysayers who bought in the frothier “we’re going to be an asset-light branded goods company” days of 2015-2017. It would put March 2019 PER at just under 20x and just under 13.9x March 2019 expected EV/EBITDA.

2. Will Rakuten Get A Near-Term Lyft?

Rakuten Inc (4755 JP) is much in the news for many reasons – one of which being a plunge into the deeper waters of being the fourth Type I Mobile Network Operator in Japan, having officially applied for the license in February 2018 and seeing it approved in April.  – the license for which it applied a year ago, with approval received in April 2018. The goal has been to use its initial foray into the MVNO business where it has more than 1.5 million users, and increase its footprint to attract some of its 100+mm Rakuten IDs, 7mm Rakuten Bank accountholders, 3mm Rakuten Securities accountholders, so that it can increase the LTV (LifeTimeValue) of its existing customer base. 

The goal is to introduce service this year (also a requirement of the terms of its license), growing steadily to have 15mm subs in 10 years. The estimated hardware spend is said to be ¥600-700bn on base stations and equipment, initially concentrating on areas in and around mass transit stations in urban areas such as Tokyo and Osaka, and then expand outward. The company has signed deals with numerous partners in electricity distribution such as Tokyo Electric Power Co (9501 JP), Chubu Electric Power Co (9502 JP), and Kansai Electric Power Co (9503 JP) to install transmission equipment on these companies’ power poles and other infrastructure.

The shares have suffered mightily since the plan came to light in mid-December 2015, underperforming the TOPIX Info & Communications Sector Index by more than 20% in the fourteen months through yesterday. The sharp drop on the left hand side of the chart was a two-day sell-a-thon by investors convinced the company was about to waste billions of dollars. The Info & Communications Sector Index also dropped sharply on that day on fears that a fourth entrant with a declared goal of dropping monthly charges by 40% would increase churn at the existing Big Three (NTT Docomo Inc (9437 JP), Softbank Corp (9434 JP), and KDDI Corp (9433 JP)) and possibly cause a price war. The shares dropped from about ¥1140 to ¥1020/share, and then slid another 30-odd percent in the next six months to ¥700/share.

The shares have rebounded, fell back in autumn general market weakness, rebounded a tie-up on payments with KDDI announced Nov1 and decent Q3 numbes announced less than 2 weeks later, got crushed in the sharp global selloff in November and December, then had a v-shaped rebound at the start of 2019. 

At the end of January Rakuten Mobile Network received blanket licenses to transmit on 1.7Ghz in the major regions  covering Tokyo, Kyoto, Osaka, Nagoya and Yokohama from the local Bureaus of Communication, and expects to receive others soon. Last week, Rakuten reported full-year earnings through end-December with revenues up 16.6%yoy to just over ¥1.1 trillion, OP (IFRS) at ¥170.4bn, and Net Income at ¥142bn and on the same day announced Nokia had been granted the contract to deploy a turnkey solution as had been previously tested and speculated. 

There are numerous telecom and retailing experts publishing on Smartkarma who have more expertise on Rakuten’s telecom plans and their plans to compete harder against Amazon Japan and Yahoo Japan and others in the e-tailing space. 

I am not going to pretend to their level of knowledge on telecom or retailing (I found Kirk Boodry’s piece on the upcoming 5G allocations in March to be particularly informative) but I will note that Rakuten has a) the ability to borrow against the hardware and licenses, b) can roll out hardware quarter-by-quarter, and c) the KDDI/Rakuten deal is important. In it, KDDI will give Rakuten access to its nationwide roaming network, and Rakuten will provide KDDI with expertise on mobile payments – especially relevant as KDDI is now building out au Financial as briefly discussed here. 

But There is More NewsFlow To Come, And THAT is Interesting

In March 2015, Rakuten CEO Hiroshi Mikitani announced that Rakuten had invested US$300mm in a then just-become-unicorn ride-sharing company called Lyft Inc (0812823D US), which at the end of the Series E round in May 2015 would leave it with ~11.9% of the company at a ~US$2.4-2.5bn post-money valuation. Recent articles suggest that Rakuten remains the top investor (though a WSJ article 2 weeks ago noted there would be golden shares. Hiroshi Mikitani remains a board member of Lyft.

That becomes important as by all accounts I can find (much more detail below), Rakuten continued investing in the four subsequent funding rounds through last summer, leaving the company as the largest single shareholder in Lyft as it prepares for its IPO later this spring. Lyft confidentially filed its IPO paperwork (a “draft S-1”) with the SEC in early December 2018, leaping ahead of Uber in the race to IPO first so the much larger Uber valuation doesn’t block Lyft’s chances for raising funds.

Reuters carried an article Thursday night Asia time saying Lyft planned to start its roadshow the week of March 18th, with an expected valuation of US$20-25 billion, and the first-mover advantage would allow Lyft to set the metrics it wants to use upon which to be judged and priced (if it waited, it would have to be compared to Uber). That could mean more emphasis on the company’s strong suite of self-driving partnerships (drive.ai, Ford, GM, Jaguar, Nutonomy, Waymo, others). A March 18th roadshow would require a full S-1 filing two weeks prior to that.

A successful IPO story based on picking up market share (reportedly doubled to 28% by end-2018 vs end-2016) might make Rakuten’s other investments look good too (Rakuten led Series B, C, D, and E funding for Spanish-language ride-hailing app cabify from 2014-2018 (and reportedly pushed cabify to merge with Lyft last year) and has invested in multiple rounds in SE Asian version GoJek.

The runup to this IPO and the clarity a filing could provide on ownership could provide a near-term fillip to Rakuten’s share price. 

3. Doosan E&C Rights Offer: Conditions & Timetable

• Doosan E&C’s rights offer is pretty much in line with the street’s initial expectation. They raise an estimated ₩420bil at an offer price of ₩1,255. The recently amended KRX rule allows an issuer to freely set an offer price. They set it at ₩1,255 based on the Feb 13~20 prices with a 15% discount.
• Final price will be fixed on Apr 30. Whichever higher of ₩1,255 or Apr 26~30 VWAP at a 40% discount will be a final offering price. So, offering price must be at least ₩1,255. Mar 27 will be the ex-rights day. Subscription rights will be listed and traded on Apr 18~24. New shares will be listed on May 24.
• ₩1,255 is a lot more aggressive than generally viewed. DHICO owns nearly two thirds of E&C stake. With a 20% oversubscription, nearly ₩300bil will likely come from DHICO. This is like DHICO is helping E&C at an even heftier price. This is why the market is being much softer on E&C relative to DHICO.

4. DHICO (Doosan Heavy) Rights Offer: Conditions & Timetable

• This is a total ₩608.4bil rights offer. This is larger than initially expected. A projected ₩543bil will be raised through common share issuance. The other ₩65bil will be raised in the form of RCPS. This is a combined 72.56% capital increase with a 42.05% share dilution.
• 80% will be allocated to the stockholders. Per share allocation for the stockholders is 0.58. Mar 27 is the ex-rights day for both Common and RCPS. Subscription rights will be listed and trade on Apr 19~25 only for Common. May 2 is for final pricing. New Common shares will be listed on May 29.
• Offering size is much larger than initially expected. In the short-term, DHICO shares will likely take a harsh beating. At this point, we’d better stay away from it for now.

5. GrainCorp (GNC AU): Pressure Mounts, Diminishing the Prospects of a Bump to the LTAP Bid

Frustration on the slow progress of the LTAP bid came to a head at the recent AGM, where shareholders registered what appeared to be protest votes aimed at Graincorp Ltd A (GNC AU)’s director elections and remuneration. The Board has currently three options to unlock shareholder value – achieve a binding LTAP bid, commence the portfolio review driven sale process or adopt the Tanarra Capital proposal.

In this briefing:

1. Will Rakuten Get A Near-Term Lyft?
2. Doosan E&C Rights Offer: Conditions & Timetable
3. DHICO (Doosan Heavy) Rights Offer: Conditions & Timetable
4. GrainCorp (GNC AU): Pressure Mounts, Diminishing the Prospects of a Bump to the LTAP Bid
5. Petrus Doubles Down On Ophir Energy

1. Will Rakuten Get A Near-Term Lyft?

Rakuten Inc (4755 JP) is much in the news for many reasons – one of which being a plunge into the deeper waters of being the fourth Type I Mobile Network Operator in Japan, having officially applied for the license in February 2018 and seeing it approved in April.  – the license for which it applied a year ago, with approval received in April 2018. The goal has been to use its initial foray into the MVNO business where it has more than 1.5 million users, and increase its footprint to attract some of its 100+mm Rakuten IDs, 7mm Rakuten Bank accountholders, 3mm Rakuten Securities accountholders, so that it can increase the LTV (LifeTimeValue) of its existing customer base. 

The goal is to introduce service this year (also a requirement of the terms of its license), growing steadily to have 15mm subs in 10 years. The estimated hardware spend is said to be ¥600-700bn on base stations and equipment, initially concentrating on areas in and around mass transit stations in urban areas such as Tokyo and Osaka, and then expand outward. The company has signed deals with numerous partners in electricity distribution such as Tokyo Electric Power Co (9501 JP), Chubu Electric Power Co (9502 JP), and Kansai Electric Power Co (9503 JP) to install transmission equipment on these companies’ power poles and other infrastructure.

The shares have suffered mightily since the plan came to light in mid-December 2015, underperforming the TOPIX Info & Communications Sector Index by more than 20% in the fourteen months through yesterday. The sharp drop on the left hand side of the chart was a two-day sell-a-thon by investors convinced the company was about to waste billions of dollars. The Info & Communications Sector Index also dropped sharply on that day on fears that a fourth entrant with a declared goal of dropping monthly charges by 40% would increase churn at the existing Big Three (NTT Docomo Inc (9437 JP), Softbank Corp (9434 JP), and KDDI Corp (9433 JP)) and possibly cause a price war. The shares dropped from about ¥1140 to ¥1020/share, and then slid another 30-odd percent in the next six months to ¥700/share.

The shares have rebounded, fell back in autumn general market weakness, rebounded a tie-up on payments with KDDI announced Nov1 and decent Q3 numbes announced less than 2 weeks later, got crushed in the sharp global selloff in November and December, then had a v-shaped rebound at the start of 2019. 

At the end of January Rakuten Mobile Network received blanket licenses to transmit on 1.7Ghz in the major regions  covering Tokyo, Kyoto, Osaka, Nagoya and Yokohama from the local Bureaus of Communication, and expects to receive others soon. Last week, Rakuten reported full-year earnings through end-December with revenues up 16.6%yoy to just over ¥1.1 trillion, OP (IFRS) at ¥170.4bn, and Net Income at ¥142bn and on the same day announced Nokia had been granted the contract to deploy a turnkey solution as had been previously tested and speculated. 

There are numerous telecom and retailing experts publishing on Smartkarma who have more expertise on Rakuten’s telecom plans and their plans to compete harder against Amazon Japan and Yahoo Japan and others in the e-tailing space. 

I am not going to pretend to their level of knowledge on telecom or retailing (I found Kirk Boodry’s piece on the upcoming 5G allocations in March to be particularly informative) but I will note that Rakuten has a) the ability to borrow against the hardware and licenses, b) can roll out hardware quarter-by-quarter, and c) the KDDI/Rakuten deal is important. In it, KDDI will give Rakuten access to its nationwide roaming network, and Rakuten will provide KDDI with expertise on mobile payments – especially relevant as KDDI is now building out au Financial as briefly discussed here. 

But There is More NewsFlow To Come, And THAT is Interesting

In March 2015, Rakuten CEO Hiroshi Mikitani announced that Rakuten had invested US$300mm in a then just-become-unicorn ride-sharing company called Lyft Inc (0812823D US), which at the end of the Series E round in May 2015 would leave it with ~11.9% of the company at a ~US$2.4-2.5bn post-money valuation. Recent articles suggest that Rakuten remains the top investor (though a WSJ article 2 weeks ago noted there would be golden shares. Hiroshi Mikitani remains a board member of Lyft.

That becomes important as by all accounts I can find (much more detail below), Rakuten continued investing in the four subsequent funding rounds through last summer, leaving the company as the largest single shareholder in Lyft as it prepares for its IPO later this spring. Lyft confidentially filed its IPO paperwork (a “draft S-1”) with the SEC in early December 2018, leaping ahead of Uber in the race to IPO first so the much larger Uber valuation doesn’t block Lyft’s chances for raising funds.

Reuters carried an article Thursday night Asia time saying Lyft planned to start its roadshow the week of March 18th, with an expected valuation of US$20-25 billion, and the first-mover advantage would allow Lyft to set the metrics it wants to use upon which to be judged and priced (if it waited, it would have to be compared to Uber). That could mean more emphasis on the company’s strong suite of self-driving partnerships (drive.ai, Ford, GM, Jaguar, Nutonomy, Waymo, others). A March 18th roadshow would require a full S-1 filing two weeks prior to that.

A successful IPO story based on picking up market share (reportedly doubled to 28% by end-2018 vs end-2016) might make Rakuten’s other investments look good too (Rakuten led Series B, C, D, and E funding for Spanish-language ride-hailing app cabify from 2014-2018 (and reportedly pushed cabify to merge with Lyft last year) and has invested in multiple rounds in SE Asian version GoJek.

The runup to this IPO and the clarity a filing could provide on ownership could provide a near-term fillip to Rakuten’s share price. 

2. Doosan E&C Rights Offer: Conditions & Timetable

• Doosan E&C’s rights offer is pretty much in line with the street’s initial expectation. They raise an estimated ₩420bil at an offer price of ₩1,255. The recently amended KRX rule allows an issuer to freely set an offer price. They set it at ₩1,255 based on the Feb 13~20 prices with a 15% discount.
• Final price will be fixed on Apr 30. Whichever higher of ₩1,255 or Apr 26~30 VWAP at a 40% discount will be a final offering price. So, offering price must be at least ₩1,255. Mar 27 will be the ex-rights day. Subscription rights will be listed and traded on Apr 18~24. New shares will be listed on May 24.
• ₩1,255 is a lot more aggressive than generally viewed. DHICO owns nearly two thirds of E&C stake. With a 20% oversubscription, nearly ₩300bil will likely come from DHICO. This is like DHICO is helping E&C at an even heftier price. This is why the market is being much softer on E&C relative to DHICO.

3. DHICO (Doosan Heavy) Rights Offer: Conditions & Timetable

• This is a total ₩608.4bil rights offer. This is larger than initially expected. A projected ₩543bil will be raised through common share issuance. The other ₩65bil will be raised in the form of RCPS. This is a combined 72.56% capital increase with a 42.05% share dilution.
• 80% will be allocated to the stockholders. Per share allocation for the stockholders is 0.58. Mar 27 is the ex-rights day for both Common and RCPS. Subscription rights will be listed and trade on Apr 19~25 only for Common. May 2 is for final pricing. New Common shares will be listed on May 29.
• Offering size is much larger than initially expected. In the short-term, DHICO shares will likely take a harsh beating. At this point, we’d better stay away from it for now.

4. GrainCorp (GNC AU): Pressure Mounts, Diminishing the Prospects of a Bump to the LTAP Bid

Frustration on the slow progress of the LTAP bid came to a head at the recent AGM, where shareholders registered what appeared to be protest votes aimed at Graincorp Ltd A (GNC AU)’s director elections and remuneration. The Board has currently three options to unlock shareholder value – achieve a binding LTAP bid, commence the portfolio review driven sale process or adopt the Tanarra Capital proposal.

5. Petrus Doubles Down On Ophir Energy

Petrus Advisors (3.5% shareholder) has dialled up the pressure on its opposition to Medco Energi Internasional T (MEDC IJ)‘s £0.55/share offer for Ophir Energy (OPHR LN), specifically calling into question Bill Schrader (Ophir’s Chairman) “unprofessionalism”.

Petrus (again) highlighted the premature termination of the Fortuna licence. Ophir announced a $300mn non-cash impairment in early January following the denial of the license extension for the Fortuna project in Equatorial Guinea (EG), having previously written down $310mn back in September. Ophir had invested ~US$700mn in the licence. Petrus accused Schrader of dropping the ball after the departure of CEO Nick Cooper in April 2018, who held key businesses relationships in EQ.

In its prior letter to Ophir on the 14 January, Petrus recommended selling the South-East Asian (SEA) assets to Medco, with a low-end fair value, before synergies, of £0.64/share, through to £1.42/share on a blue sky basis.

Furthermore, Petrus reckons no marketing effort has been for the Mexican license and the 20% ownership in Blocks 1 & 2 in Tanzania, which together have low-end value of $60mn (£0.065/share).  Petrus added that Schrader had not actively solicited and considered alternative offers from other buyers; together with stonewalling demands for Ophir to return capital to shareholders.

Petrus signed off its latest salvo with a cordial “This is your final reminder to preserve and build value. We reserve all our legal rights in this situation“.

Further stirring the pot is alternative hedge fund Sand Grove, who has increased its exposure, via cash-settled derivatives, to 17.28% (as at13 February), up from 6.79% on the 1st February. I have heard, but yet to confirm, there are other shareholders seeking to disrupt this Offer.  Ian Hannam, who advised Ophir’s board on its 2013 right issue, is understood to have also written to Ophir’s interim CEO Alan Booth and the board saying Medco’s offer is too low.

Trading marginally through terms. Medco’s Offer is conditional on 75%+ approval from Ophir’s shareholders, which appears tenuous.

Medco has the option to switch into a Takeover Offer, which in theory could be conditional on a 50% acceptance level, if Medco was in any way inclined to maintain Ophir’s listing. And a switch to a Tender Offer with a reduced shareholder condition, may further flesh out an alternative bidder to come over the top.

Ophir appears a worthwhile punt up at or just below terms. The next key event is the expected issuance of the Scheme booklet on the 28 February.

In this briefing:

1. Doosan E&C Rights Offer: Conditions & Timetable
2. DHICO (Doosan Heavy) Rights Offer: Conditions & Timetable
3. GrainCorp (GNC AU): Pressure Mounts, Diminishing the Prospects of a Bump to the LTAP Bid
4. Petrus Doubles Down On Ophir Energy
5. BGF Duo Stub Trade: Short Sub / Long Holdco with a Very Short-Term Horizon

1. Doosan E&C Rights Offer: Conditions & Timetable

• Doosan E&C’s rights offer is pretty much in line with the street’s initial expectation. They raise an estimated ₩420bil at an offer price of ₩1,255. The recently amended KRX rule allows an issuer to freely set an offer price. They set it at ₩1,255 based on the Feb 13~20 prices with a 15% discount.
• Final price will be fixed on Apr 30. Whichever higher of ₩1,255 or Apr 26~30 VWAP at a 40% discount will be a final offering price. So, offering price must be at least ₩1,255. Mar 27 will be the ex-rights day. Subscription rights will be listed and traded on Apr 18~24. New shares will be listed on May 24.
• ₩1,255 is a lot more aggressive than generally viewed. DHICO owns nearly two thirds of E&C stake. With a 20% oversubscription, nearly ₩300bil will likely come from DHICO. This is like DHICO is helping E&C at an even heftier price. This is why the market is being much softer on E&C relative to DHICO.

2. DHICO (Doosan Heavy) Rights Offer: Conditions & Timetable

• This is a total ₩608.4bil rights offer. This is larger than initially expected. A projected ₩543bil will be raised through common share issuance. The other ₩65bil will be raised in the form of RCPS. This is a combined 72.56% capital increase with a 42.05% share dilution.
• 80% will be allocated to the stockholders. Per share allocation for the stockholders is 0.58. Mar 27 is the ex-rights day for both Common and RCPS. Subscription rights will be listed and trade on Apr 19~25 only for Common. May 2 is for final pricing. New Common shares will be listed on May 29.
• Offering size is much larger than initially expected. In the short-term, DHICO shares will likely take a harsh beating. At this point, we’d better stay away from it for now.

3. GrainCorp (GNC AU): Pressure Mounts, Diminishing the Prospects of a Bump to the LTAP Bid

Frustration on the slow progress of the LTAP bid came to a head at the recent AGM, where shareholders registered what appeared to be protest votes aimed at Graincorp Ltd A (GNC AU)’s director elections and remuneration. The Board has currently three options to unlock shareholder value – achieve a binding LTAP bid, commence the portfolio review driven sale process or adopt the Tanarra Capital proposal.

4. Petrus Doubles Down On Ophir Energy

Petrus Advisors (3.5% shareholder) has dialled up the pressure on its opposition to Medco Energi Internasional T (MEDC IJ)‘s £0.55/share offer for Ophir Energy (OPHR LN), specifically calling into question Bill Schrader (Ophir’s Chairman) “unprofessionalism”.

Petrus (again) highlighted the premature termination of the Fortuna licence. Ophir announced a $300mn non-cash impairment in early January following the denial of the license extension for the Fortuna project in Equatorial Guinea (EG), having previously written down $310mn back in September. Ophir had invested ~US$700mn in the licence. Petrus accused Schrader of dropping the ball after the departure of CEO Nick Cooper in April 2018, who held key businesses relationships in EQ.

In its prior letter to Ophir on the 14 January, Petrus recommended selling the South-East Asian (SEA) assets to Medco, with a low-end fair value, before synergies, of £0.64/share, through to £1.42/share on a blue sky basis.

Furthermore, Petrus reckons no marketing effort has been for the Mexican license and the 20% ownership in Blocks 1 & 2 in Tanzania, which together have low-end value of $60mn (£0.065/share).  Petrus added that Schrader had not actively solicited and considered alternative offers from other buyers; together with stonewalling demands for Ophir to return capital to shareholders.

Petrus signed off its latest salvo with a cordial “This is your final reminder to preserve and build value. We reserve all our legal rights in this situation“.

Further stirring the pot is alternative hedge fund Sand Grove, who has increased its exposure, via cash-settled derivatives, to 17.28% (as at13 February), up from 6.79% on the 1st February. I have heard, but yet to confirm, there are other shareholders seeking to disrupt this Offer.  Ian Hannam, who advised Ophir’s board on its 2013 right issue, is understood to have also written to Ophir’s interim CEO Alan Booth and the board saying Medco’s offer is too low.

Trading marginally through terms. Medco’s Offer is conditional on 75%+ approval from Ophir’s shareholders, which appears tenuous.

Medco has the option to switch into a Takeover Offer, which in theory could be conditional on a 50% acceptance level, if Medco was in any way inclined to maintain Ophir’s listing. And a switch to a Tender Offer with a reduced shareholder condition, may further flesh out an alternative bidder to come over the top.

Ophir appears a worthwhile punt up at or just below terms. The next key event is the expected issuance of the Scheme booklet on the 28 February.

5. BGF Duo Stub Trade: Short Sub / Long Holdco with a Very Short-Term Horizon

• The BGF Holdco/Sub duo is making a very dynamic movement. Yesterday, they made a 2σ jump. Sub went up 5.38%. Holdco stayed flat with a 0.24% gain. The day before yesterday, they made an exact opposite movement. Holdco was up 2%. Sub suffered a 3% loss. This also resulted in a 2σ jump, just the opposite way.
• Still, local street sentiments are heavily divided on Sub’s fundamentals. There is no news or anything that may possibly reverse the tide at this point. Shorting on Sub is still going very strong. It seems that a lot of short-term traders both at home and abroad are trading on the duo lately.
• On a 120D horizon, Holdco is still undervalued relative to Sub by about 10%. The duo should be again reverted back to a mean in favor of Holdco today. I’d suggest going long Holdco and short Sub now if you had closed the previous position which we initiated last week on Feb 13.

In this briefing:

1. DHICO (Doosan Heavy) Rights Offer: Conditions & Timetable
2. GrainCorp (GNC AU): Pressure Mounts, Diminishing the Prospects of a Bump to the LTAP Bid
3. Petrus Doubles Down On Ophir Energy
4. BGF Duo Stub Trade: Short Sub / Long Holdco with a Very Short-Term Horizon
5. Delta Thailand’s Tender Offer: Updated Timetable

1. DHICO (Doosan Heavy) Rights Offer: Conditions & Timetable

• This is a total ₩608.4bil rights offer. This is larger than initially expected. A projected ₩543bil will be raised through common share issuance. The other ₩65bil will be raised in the form of RCPS. This is a combined 72.56% capital increase with a 42.05% share dilution.
• 80% will be allocated to the stockholders. Per share allocation for the stockholders is 0.58. Mar 27 is the ex-rights day for both Common and RCPS. Subscription rights will be listed and trade on Apr 19~25 only for Common. May 2 is for final pricing. New Common shares will be listed on May 29.
• Offering size is much larger than initially expected. In the short-term, DHICO shares will likely take a harsh beating. At this point, we’d better stay away from it for now.

2. GrainCorp (GNC AU): Pressure Mounts, Diminishing the Prospects of a Bump to the LTAP Bid

Frustration on the slow progress of the LTAP bid came to a head at the recent AGM, where shareholders registered what appeared to be protest votes aimed at Graincorp Ltd A (GNC AU)’s director elections and remuneration. The Board has currently three options to unlock shareholder value – achieve a binding LTAP bid, commence the portfolio review driven sale process or adopt the Tanarra Capital proposal.

3. Petrus Doubles Down On Ophir Energy

Petrus Advisors (3.5% shareholder) has dialled up the pressure on its opposition to Medco Energi Internasional T (MEDC IJ)‘s £0.55/share offer for Ophir Energy (OPHR LN), specifically calling into question Bill Schrader (Ophir’s Chairman) “unprofessionalism”.

Petrus (again) highlighted the premature termination of the Fortuna licence. Ophir announced a $300mn non-cash impairment in early January following the denial of the license extension for the Fortuna project in Equatorial Guinea (EG), having previously written down $310mn back in September. Ophir had invested ~US$700mn in the licence. Petrus accused Schrader of dropping the ball after the departure of CEO Nick Cooper in April 2018, who held key businesses relationships in EQ.

In its prior letter to Ophir on the 14 January, Petrus recommended selling the South-East Asian (SEA) assets to Medco, with a low-end fair value, before synergies, of £0.64/share, through to £1.42/share on a blue sky basis.

Furthermore, Petrus reckons no marketing effort has been for the Mexican license and the 20% ownership in Blocks 1 & 2 in Tanzania, which together have low-end value of $60mn (£0.065/share).  Petrus added that Schrader had not actively solicited and considered alternative offers from other buyers; together with stonewalling demands for Ophir to return capital to shareholders.

Petrus signed off its latest salvo with a cordial “This is your final reminder to preserve and build value. We reserve all our legal rights in this situation“.

Further stirring the pot is alternative hedge fund Sand Grove, who has increased its exposure, via cash-settled derivatives, to 17.28% (as at13 February), up from 6.79% on the 1st February. I have heard, but yet to confirm, there are other shareholders seeking to disrupt this Offer.  Ian Hannam, who advised Ophir’s board on its 2013 right issue, is understood to have also written to Ophir’s interim CEO Alan Booth and the board saying Medco’s offer is too low.

Trading marginally through terms. Medco’s Offer is conditional on 75%+ approval from Ophir’s shareholders, which appears tenuous.

Medco has the option to switch into a Takeover Offer, which in theory could be conditional on a 50% acceptance level, if Medco was in any way inclined to maintain Ophir’s listing. And a switch to a Tender Offer with a reduced shareholder condition, may further flesh out an alternative bidder to come over the top.

Ophir appears a worthwhile punt up at or just below terms. The next key event is the expected issuance of the Scheme booklet on the 28 February.

4. BGF Duo Stub Trade: Short Sub / Long Holdco with a Very Short-Term Horizon

• The BGF Holdco/Sub duo is making a very dynamic movement. Yesterday, they made a 2σ jump. Sub went up 5.38%. Holdco stayed flat with a 0.24% gain. The day before yesterday, they made an exact opposite movement. Holdco was up 2%. Sub suffered a 3% loss. This also resulted in a 2σ jump, just the opposite way.
• Still, local street sentiments are heavily divided on Sub’s fundamentals. There is no news or anything that may possibly reverse the tide at this point. Shorting on Sub is still going very strong. It seems that a lot of short-term traders both at home and abroad are trading on the duo lately.
• On a 120D horizon, Holdco is still undervalued relative to Sub by about 10%. The duo should be again reverted back to a mean in favor of Holdco today. I’d suggest going long Holdco and short Sub now if you had closed the previous position which we initiated last week on Feb 13.

5. Delta Thailand’s Tender Offer: Updated Timetable

With Form 247-3 (Intention to Make a Tender Offer) and the FY18 dividend  (Bt2.30/share) for Delta Electronics Thai (DELTA TB) having been announced, this insight briefly provides an updated indicative timetable for investors.

The next key date is the submission of Form 247-4, the Tender Offer for Securities, which will provide full details of the Offer.

This above indicative timetable assumes a conditional offer based on a minimum acceptance level of at least 50%. Payment under the offer may indeed be earlier, as explained below, which also ties in with a shareholders’ right to revoke shares tendered. 

In addition, investors should not tender once the offer opens – assuming the tender period commences on the 25 February – but wait until their shares are on the registry as at 4 March to receive the FY18 dividend.

Currently trading at a 2.2%/22% gross/annualised spread. Bear in mind the dividend is subject to 10% tax.

In this briefing:

1. GrainCorp (GNC AU): Pressure Mounts, Diminishing the Prospects of a Bump to the LTAP Bid
2. Petrus Doubles Down On Ophir Energy
3. BGF Duo Stub Trade: Short Sub / Long Holdco with a Very Short-Term Horizon
4. Delta Thailand’s Tender Offer: Updated Timetable
5. Glovis/Mobis Pair Trade: Glovis Being Overpriced Relative to Mobis on Unsubstantiated Speculation

1. GrainCorp (GNC AU): Pressure Mounts, Diminishing the Prospects of a Bump to the LTAP Bid

Frustration on the slow progress of the LTAP bid came to a head at the recent AGM, where shareholders registered what appeared to be protest votes aimed at Graincorp Ltd A (GNC AU)’s director elections and remuneration. The Board has currently three options to unlock shareholder value – achieve a binding LTAP bid, commence the portfolio review driven sale process or adopt the Tanarra Capital proposal.

2. Petrus Doubles Down On Ophir Energy

Petrus Advisors (3.5% shareholder) has dialled up the pressure on its opposition to Medco Energi Internasional T (MEDC IJ)‘s £0.55/share offer for Ophir Energy (OPHR LN), specifically calling into question Bill Schrader (Ophir’s Chairman) “unprofessionalism”.

Petrus (again) highlighted the premature termination of the Fortuna licence. Ophir announced a $300mn non-cash impairment in early January following the denial of the license extension for the Fortuna project in Equatorial Guinea (EG), having previously written down $310mn back in September. Ophir had invested ~US$700mn in the licence. Petrus accused Schrader of dropping the ball after the departure of CEO Nick Cooper in April 2018, who held key businesses relationships in EQ.

In its prior letter to Ophir on the 14 January, Petrus recommended selling the South-East Asian (SEA) assets to Medco, with a low-end fair value, before synergies, of £0.64/share, through to £1.42/share on a blue sky basis.

Furthermore, Petrus reckons no marketing effort has been for the Mexican license and the 20% ownership in Blocks 1 & 2 in Tanzania, which together have low-end value of $60mn (£0.065/share).  Petrus added that Schrader had not actively solicited and considered alternative offers from other buyers; together with stonewalling demands for Ophir to return capital to shareholders.

Petrus signed off its latest salvo with a cordial “This is your final reminder to preserve and build value. We reserve all our legal rights in this situation“.

Further stirring the pot is alternative hedge fund Sand Grove, who has increased its exposure, via cash-settled derivatives, to 17.28% (as at13 February), up from 6.79% on the 1st February. I have heard, but yet to confirm, there are other shareholders seeking to disrupt this Offer.  Ian Hannam, who advised Ophir’s board on its 2013 right issue, is understood to have also written to Ophir’s interim CEO Alan Booth and the board saying Medco’s offer is too low.

Trading marginally through terms. Medco’s Offer is conditional on 75%+ approval from Ophir’s shareholders, which appears tenuous.

Medco has the option to switch into a Takeover Offer, which in theory could be conditional on a 50% acceptance level, if Medco was in any way inclined to maintain Ophir’s listing. And a switch to a Tender Offer with a reduced shareholder condition, may further flesh out an alternative bidder to come over the top.

Ophir appears a worthwhile punt up at or just below terms. The next key event is the expected issuance of the Scheme booklet on the 28 February.

3. BGF Duo Stub Trade: Short Sub / Long Holdco with a Very Short-Term Horizon

• The BGF Holdco/Sub duo is making a very dynamic movement. Yesterday, they made a 2σ jump. Sub went up 5.38%. Holdco stayed flat with a 0.24% gain. The day before yesterday, they made an exact opposite movement. Holdco was up 2%. Sub suffered a 3% loss. This also resulted in a 2σ jump, just the opposite way.
• Still, local street sentiments are heavily divided on Sub’s fundamentals. There is no news or anything that may possibly reverse the tide at this point. Shorting on Sub is still going very strong. It seems that a lot of short-term traders both at home and abroad are trading on the duo lately.
• On a 120D horizon, Holdco is still undervalued relative to Sub by about 10%. The duo should be again reverted back to a mean in favor of Holdco today. I’d suggest going long Holdco and short Sub now if you had closed the previous position which we initiated last week on Feb 13.

4. Delta Thailand’s Tender Offer: Updated Timetable

With Form 247-3 (Intention to Make a Tender Offer) and the FY18 dividend  (Bt2.30/share) for Delta Electronics Thai (DELTA TB) having been announced, this insight briefly provides an updated indicative timetable for investors.

The next key date is the submission of Form 247-4, the Tender Offer for Securities, which will provide full details of the Offer.

This above indicative timetable assumes a conditional offer based on a minimum acceptance level of at least 50%. Payment under the offer may indeed be earlier, as explained below, which also ties in with a shareholders’ right to revoke shares tendered. 

In addition, investors should not tender once the offer opens – assuming the tender period commences on the 25 February – but wait until their shares are on the registry as at 4 March to receive the FY18 dividend.

Currently trading at a 2.2%/22% gross/annualised spread. Bear in mind the dividend is subject to 10% tax.

5. Glovis/Mobis Pair Trade: Glovis Being Overpriced Relative to Mobis on Unsubstantiated Speculation

• There are still two schools of thought on the HMG restructuring. Glovis/Mobis merged entity as a holdco is the one. Only Glovis as a holdco with Mobis→HM→Kia below is the other. Since late 3Q last year, the local street started speculating on the latter.
• This has pushed up Glovis price relative to Mobis. They are now near 200% of σ in favor of Glovis on a 20D MA. Glovis made a 2+σ jump upwardly just in 4 trading days. On a 120D horizon, they are almost at the 120D high.
• At this point, neither is a hassle free way. In the latter, Glovis has to come up with nearly ₩2tril to buy Kia’s Mobis stake, highly likely through new debts. This financial burden wouldn’t be light on Glovis. Glovis may also be facing a risk of forceful holdco conversion. This will create a serious headache with Kia as a grand grand son subsidiary.
• The current speculation pushing up Glovis relative to Mobis has yet to be sufficiently substantiated/justified. This suggests Glovis is being overbought on a speculation that will very likely be short-lived. I expect there will soon be a mean reversion for Mobis. I’d go long Mobis and short Glovis at this point.

In this briefing:

1. Petrus Doubles Down On Ophir Energy
2. BGF Duo Stub Trade: Short Sub / Long Holdco with a Very Short-Term Horizon
3. Delta Thailand’s Tender Offer: Updated Timetable
4. Glovis/Mobis Pair Trade: Glovis Being Overpriced Relative to Mobis on Unsubstantiated Speculation
5. StubWorld: Can One’s Offer For Kian Joo Can; Mahindra At Possible Set-Up Levels

1. Petrus Doubles Down On Ophir Energy

Petrus Advisors (3.5% shareholder) has dialled up the pressure on its opposition to Medco Energi Internasional T (MEDC IJ)‘s £0.55/share offer for Ophir Energy (OPHR LN), specifically calling into question Bill Schrader (Ophir’s Chairman) “unprofessionalism”.

Petrus (again) highlighted the premature termination of the Fortuna licence. Ophir announced a $300mn non-cash impairment in early January following the denial of the license extension for the Fortuna project in Equatorial Guinea (EG), having previously written down $310mn back in September. Ophir had invested ~US$700mn in the licence. Petrus accused Schrader of dropping the ball after the departure of CEO Nick Cooper in April 2018, who held key businesses relationships in EQ.

In its prior letter to Ophir on the 14 January, Petrus recommended selling the South-East Asian (SEA) assets to Medco, with a low-end fair value, before synergies, of £0.64/share, through to £1.42/share on a blue sky basis.

Furthermore, Petrus reckons no marketing effort has been for the Mexican license and the 20% ownership in Blocks 1 & 2 in Tanzania, which together have low-end value of $60mn (£0.065/share).  Petrus added that Schrader had not actively solicited and considered alternative offers from other buyers; together with stonewalling demands for Ophir to return capital to shareholders.

Petrus signed off its latest salvo with a cordial “This is your final reminder to preserve and build value. We reserve all our legal rights in this situation“.

Further stirring the pot is alternative hedge fund Sand Grove, who has increased its exposure, via cash-settled derivatives, to 17.28% (as at13 February), up from 6.79% on the 1st February. I have heard, but yet to confirm, there are other shareholders seeking to disrupt this Offer.  Ian Hannam, who advised Ophir’s board on its 2013 right issue, is understood to have also written to Ophir’s interim CEO Alan Booth and the board saying Medco’s offer is too low.

Trading marginally through terms. Medco’s Offer is conditional on 75%+ approval from Ophir’s shareholders, which appears tenuous.

Medco has the option to switch into a Takeover Offer, which in theory could be conditional on a 50% acceptance level, if Medco was in any way inclined to maintain Ophir’s listing. And a switch to a Tender Offer with a reduced shareholder condition, may further flesh out an alternative bidder to come over the top.

Ophir appears a worthwhile punt up at or just below terms. The next key event is the expected issuance of the Scheme booklet on the 28 February.

2. BGF Duo Stub Trade: Short Sub / Long Holdco with a Very Short-Term Horizon

• The BGF Holdco/Sub duo is making a very dynamic movement. Yesterday, they made a 2σ jump. Sub went up 5.38%. Holdco stayed flat with a 0.24% gain. The day before yesterday, they made an exact opposite movement. Holdco was up 2%. Sub suffered a 3% loss. This also resulted in a 2σ jump, just the opposite way.
• Still, local street sentiments are heavily divided on Sub’s fundamentals. There is no news or anything that may possibly reverse the tide at this point. Shorting on Sub is still going very strong. It seems that a lot of short-term traders both at home and abroad are trading on the duo lately.
• On a 120D horizon, Holdco is still undervalued relative to Sub by about 10%. The duo should be again reverted back to a mean in favor of Holdco today. I’d suggest going long Holdco and short Sub now if you had closed the previous position which we initiated last week on Feb 13.

3. Delta Thailand’s Tender Offer: Updated Timetable

With Form 247-3 (Intention to Make a Tender Offer) and the FY18 dividend  (Bt2.30/share) for Delta Electronics Thai (DELTA TB) having been announced, this insight briefly provides an updated indicative timetable for investors.

The next key date is the submission of Form 247-4, the Tender Offer for Securities, which will provide full details of the Offer.

This above indicative timetable assumes a conditional offer based on a minimum acceptance level of at least 50%. Payment under the offer may indeed be earlier, as explained below, which also ties in with a shareholders’ right to revoke shares tendered. 

In addition, investors should not tender once the offer opens – assuming the tender period commences on the 25 February – but wait until their shares are on the registry as at 4 March to receive the FY18 dividend.

Currently trading at a 2.2%/22% gross/annualised spread. Bear in mind the dividend is subject to 10% tax.

4. Glovis/Mobis Pair Trade: Glovis Being Overpriced Relative to Mobis on Unsubstantiated Speculation

• There are still two schools of thought on the HMG restructuring. Glovis/Mobis merged entity as a holdco is the one. Only Glovis as a holdco with Mobis→HM→Kia below is the other. Since late 3Q last year, the local street started speculating on the latter.
• This has pushed up Glovis price relative to Mobis. They are now near 200% of σ in favor of Glovis on a 20D MA. Glovis made a 2+σ jump upwardly just in 4 trading days. On a 120D horizon, they are almost at the 120D high.
• At this point, neither is a hassle free way. In the latter, Glovis has to come up with nearly ₩2tril to buy Kia’s Mobis stake, highly likely through new debts. This financial burden wouldn’t be light on Glovis. Glovis may also be facing a risk of forceful holdco conversion. This will create a serious headache with Kia as a grand grand son subsidiary.
• The current speculation pushing up Glovis relative to Mobis has yet to be sufficiently substantiated/justified. This suggests Glovis is being overbought on a speculation that will very likely be short-lived. I expect there will soon be a mean reversion for Mobis. I’d go long Mobis and short Glovis at this point.

5. StubWorld: Can One’s Offer For Kian Joo Can; Mahindra At Possible Set-Up Levels

This week in StubWorld …

• Can One Bhd (CAN MK)‘s gets shareholder approval to launch a Mandatory General Offer for 33%-held Kian Joo Can Factory (KJC MK). (note, both legs are illiquid)
• Curtis Lehnert sees Mahindra & Mahindra (MM IN)‘s discount to NAV at its widest since 2015.

Preceding my comments on Can One/Kian Joo, Mahindra and other stubs are the weekly setup/unwind tables for Asia-Pacific Holdcos.

These relationships trade with a minimum liquidity threshold of US$1mn on a 90-day moving average, and a % market capitalisation threshold – the $ value of the holding/opco held, over the parent’s market capitalisation, expressed in percent – of at least 20%.

In this briefing:

1. BGF Duo Stub Trade: Short Sub / Long Holdco with a Very Short-Term Horizon
2. Delta Thailand’s Tender Offer: Updated Timetable
3. Glovis/Mobis Pair Trade: Glovis Being Overpriced Relative to Mobis on Unsubstantiated Speculation
4. StubWorld: Can One’s Offer For Kian Joo Can; Mahindra At Possible Set-Up Levels
5. Korean Stubs Spotlight: Close the Pair Trade Between BGF Co. & BGF Retail

1. BGF Duo Stub Trade: Short Sub / Long Holdco with a Very Short-Term Horizon

• The BGF Holdco/Sub duo is making a very dynamic movement. Yesterday, they made a 2σ jump. Sub went up 5.38%. Holdco stayed flat with a 0.24% gain. The day before yesterday, they made an exact opposite movement. Holdco was up 2%. Sub suffered a 3% loss. This also resulted in a 2σ jump, just the opposite way.
• Still, local street sentiments are heavily divided on Sub’s fundamentals. There is no news or anything that may possibly reverse the tide at this point. Shorting on Sub is still going very strong. It seems that a lot of short-term traders both at home and abroad are trading on the duo lately.
• On a 120D horizon, Holdco is still undervalued relative to Sub by about 10%. The duo should be again reverted back to a mean in favor of Holdco today. I’d suggest going long Holdco and short Sub now if you had closed the previous position which we initiated last week on Feb 13.

2. Delta Thailand’s Tender Offer: Updated Timetable

With Form 247-3 (Intention to Make a Tender Offer) and the FY18 dividend  (Bt2.30/share) for Delta Electronics Thai (DELTA TB) having been announced, this insight briefly provides an updated indicative timetable for investors.

The next key date is the submission of Form 247-4, the Tender Offer for Securities, which will provide full details of the Offer.

This above indicative timetable assumes a conditional offer based on a minimum acceptance level of at least 50%. Payment under the offer may indeed be earlier, as explained below, which also ties in with a shareholders’ right to revoke shares tendered. 

In addition, investors should not tender once the offer opens – assuming the tender period commences on the 25 February – but wait until their shares are on the registry as at 4 March to receive the FY18 dividend.

Currently trading at a 2.2%/22% gross/annualised spread. Bear in mind the dividend is subject to 10% tax.

3. Glovis/Mobis Pair Trade: Glovis Being Overpriced Relative to Mobis on Unsubstantiated Speculation

• There are still two schools of thought on the HMG restructuring. Glovis/Mobis merged entity as a holdco is the one. Only Glovis as a holdco with Mobis→HM→Kia below is the other. Since late 3Q last year, the local street started speculating on the latter.
• This has pushed up Glovis price relative to Mobis. They are now near 200% of σ in favor of Glovis on a 20D MA. Glovis made a 2+σ jump upwardly just in 4 trading days. On a 120D horizon, they are almost at the 120D high.
• At this point, neither is a hassle free way. In the latter, Glovis has to come up with nearly ₩2tril to buy Kia’s Mobis stake, highly likely through new debts. This financial burden wouldn’t be light on Glovis. Glovis may also be facing a risk of forceful holdco conversion. This will create a serious headache with Kia as a grand grand son subsidiary.
• The current speculation pushing up Glovis relative to Mobis has yet to be sufficiently substantiated/justified. This suggests Glovis is being overbought on a speculation that will very likely be short-lived. I expect there will soon be a mean reversion for Mobis. I’d go long Mobis and short Glovis at this point.

4. StubWorld: Can One’s Offer For Kian Joo Can; Mahindra At Possible Set-Up Levels

This week in StubWorld …

• Can One Bhd (CAN MK)‘s gets shareholder approval to launch a Mandatory General Offer for 33%-held Kian Joo Can Factory (KJC MK). (note, both legs are illiquid)
• Curtis Lehnert sees Mahindra & Mahindra (MM IN)‘s discount to NAV at its widest since 2015.

Preceding my comments on Can One/Kian Joo, Mahindra and other stubs are the weekly setup/unwind tables for Asia-Pacific Holdcos.

These relationships trade with a minimum liquidity threshold of US$1mn on a 90-day moving average, and a % market capitalisation threshold – the $ value of the holding/opco held, over the parent’s market capitalisation, expressed in percent – of at least 20%.

5. Korean Stubs Spotlight: Close the Pair Trade Between BGF Co. & BGF Retail

On January 8th, 2019, we wrote a report on initiating a pair trade of going long BGF Co Ltd (027410 KS) and going short Bgf Retail (282330 KS). (Korean Stubs Spotlight: A Pair Trade Between BGF Co. & BGF Retail) This trade has worked out well and now we think this is a good time to close this trade.

The return on this pair trade was 7.5%. (This assumes no commission costs, pricing spreads, taxes, or borrowing cost) using closing share price as of January 8th to February 19th, 2019. This trade was made over a period of 42 days so the annualized returns would be nearly 65%. 

It appears that many traders and investors agreed that BGF was excessively undervalued versus BGF Retail early in 2019. Among the factors cited above, the excessive NAV discount to its intrinsic value as well as the market’s overt concerns about the size of the tender offer between BGF and BGF Retail in 2018 appear to be the key factors that drove the share prices of these two firms diverging excessively in 2H 2018 but then converging back to their norms so far in 2019. 

In this briefing:

1. Delta Thailand’s Tender Offer: Updated Timetable
2. Glovis/Mobis Pair Trade: Glovis Being Overpriced Relative to Mobis on Unsubstantiated Speculation
3. StubWorld: Can One’s Offer For Kian Joo Can; Mahindra At Possible Set-Up Levels
4. Korean Stubs Spotlight: Close the Pair Trade Between BGF Co. & BGF Retail
5. TRADE IDEA – Mahindra & Mahindra (MM IN) Stub: Rise

1. Delta Thailand’s Tender Offer: Updated Timetable

With Form 247-3 (Intention to Make a Tender Offer) and the FY18 dividend  (Bt2.30/share) for Delta Electronics Thai (DELTA TB) having been announced, this insight briefly provides an updated indicative timetable for investors.

The next key date is the submission of Form 247-4, the Tender Offer for Securities, which will provide full details of the Offer.

This above indicative timetable assumes a conditional offer based on a minimum acceptance level of at least 50%. Payment under the offer may indeed be earlier, as explained below, which also ties in with a shareholders’ right to revoke shares tendered. 

In addition, investors should not tender once the offer opens – assuming the tender period commences on the 25 February – but wait until their shares are on the registry as at 4 March to receive the FY18 dividend.

Currently trading at a 2.2%/22% gross/annualised spread. Bear in mind the dividend is subject to 10% tax.

2. Glovis/Mobis Pair Trade: Glovis Being Overpriced Relative to Mobis on Unsubstantiated Speculation

• There are still two schools of thought on the HMG restructuring. Glovis/Mobis merged entity as a holdco is the one. Only Glovis as a holdco with Mobis→HM→Kia below is the other. Since late 3Q last year, the local street started speculating on the latter.
• This has pushed up Glovis price relative to Mobis. They are now near 200% of σ in favor of Glovis on a 20D MA. Glovis made a 2+σ jump upwardly just in 4 trading days. On a 120D horizon, they are almost at the 120D high.
• At this point, neither is a hassle free way. In the latter, Glovis has to come up with nearly ₩2tril to buy Kia’s Mobis stake, highly likely through new debts. This financial burden wouldn’t be light on Glovis. Glovis may also be facing a risk of forceful holdco conversion. This will create a serious headache with Kia as a grand grand son subsidiary.
• The current speculation pushing up Glovis relative to Mobis has yet to be sufficiently substantiated/justified. This suggests Glovis is being overbought on a speculation that will very likely be short-lived. I expect there will soon be a mean reversion for Mobis. I’d go long Mobis and short Glovis at this point.

3. StubWorld: Can One’s Offer For Kian Joo Can; Mahindra At Possible Set-Up Levels

This week in StubWorld …

• Can One Bhd (CAN MK)‘s gets shareholder approval to launch a Mandatory General Offer for 33%-held Kian Joo Can Factory (KJC MK). (note, both legs are illiquid)
• Curtis Lehnert sees Mahindra & Mahindra (MM IN)‘s discount to NAV at its widest since 2015.

Preceding my comments on Can One/Kian Joo, Mahindra and other stubs are the weekly setup/unwind tables for Asia-Pacific Holdcos.

These relationships trade with a minimum liquidity threshold of US$1mn on a 90-day moving average, and a % market capitalisation threshold – the $ value of the holding/opco held, over the parent’s market capitalisation, expressed in percent – of at least 20%.

4. Korean Stubs Spotlight: Close the Pair Trade Between BGF Co. & BGF Retail

On January 8th, 2019, we wrote a report on initiating a pair trade of going long BGF Co Ltd (027410 KS) and going short Bgf Retail (282330 KS). (Korean Stubs Spotlight: A Pair Trade Between BGF Co. & BGF Retail) This trade has worked out well and now we think this is a good time to close this trade.

The return on this pair trade was 7.5%. (This assumes no commission costs, pricing spreads, taxes, or borrowing cost) using closing share price as of January 8th to February 19th, 2019. This trade was made over a period of 42 days so the annualized returns would be nearly 65%. 

It appears that many traders and investors agreed that BGF was excessively undervalued versus BGF Retail early in 2019. Among the factors cited above, the excessive NAV discount to its intrinsic value as well as the market’s overt concerns about the size of the tender offer between BGF and BGF Retail in 2018 appear to be the key factors that drove the share prices of these two firms diverging excessively in 2H 2018 but then converging back to their norms so far in 2019. 

5. TRADE IDEA – Mahindra & Mahindra (MM IN) Stub: Rise

The company that brought the off-road vehicle to post-war India in the 1940s has grown into a leading personal vehicle manufacturer covering land, air and sea. Merely making cars, planes and boats wasn’t ambitious enough for this company though, the conglomerate wouldn’t be complete without a financial services and tech consulting business under the corporate umbrella. 

Indian holding companies typically trade a wider discount to NAV than their East Asian counterparts, however the 42% discount to NAV that Mahindra & Mahindra (MM IN) currently trades at, is a trough level historically for the company. In the body of this insight I will present my case for a stub trade on the company, detailing the business structure, performance and the unlisted stub businesses.

In this insight I will cover:

I. The Trade

II. Group Overview and Stub Business Review

III. My Track Record with Stub Trades

In this briefing:

1. Glovis/Mobis Pair Trade: Glovis Being Overpriced Relative to Mobis on Unsubstantiated Speculation
2. StubWorld: Can One’s Offer For Kian Joo Can; Mahindra At Possible Set-Up Levels
3. Korean Stubs Spotlight: Close the Pair Trade Between BGF Co. & BGF Retail
4. TRADE IDEA – Mahindra & Mahindra (MM IN) Stub: Rise
5. Kosaido TOB (7868 JP) Situation Gets Weird – Activists and Independent Opposition to an MBO.

1. Glovis/Mobis Pair Trade: Glovis Being Overpriced Relative to Mobis on Unsubstantiated Speculation

• There are still two schools of thought on the HMG restructuring. Glovis/Mobis merged entity as a holdco is the one. Only Glovis as a holdco with Mobis→HM→Kia below is the other. Since late 3Q last year, the local street started speculating on the latter.
• This has pushed up Glovis price relative to Mobis. They are now near 200% of σ in favor of Glovis on a 20D MA. Glovis made a 2+σ jump upwardly just in 4 trading days. On a 120D horizon, they are almost at the 120D high.
• At this point, neither is a hassle free way. In the latter, Glovis has to come up with nearly ₩2tril to buy Kia’s Mobis stake, highly likely through new debts. This financial burden wouldn’t be light on Glovis. Glovis may also be facing a risk of forceful holdco conversion. This will create a serious headache with Kia as a grand grand son subsidiary.
• The current speculation pushing up Glovis relative to Mobis has yet to be sufficiently substantiated/justified. This suggests Glovis is being overbought on a speculation that will very likely be short-lived. I expect there will soon be a mean reversion for Mobis. I’d go long Mobis and short Glovis at this point.

2. StubWorld: Can One’s Offer For Kian Joo Can; Mahindra At Possible Set-Up Levels

This week in StubWorld …

• Can One Bhd (CAN MK)‘s gets shareholder approval to launch a Mandatory General Offer for 33%-held Kian Joo Can Factory (KJC MK). (note, both legs are illiquid)
• Curtis Lehnert sees Mahindra & Mahindra (MM IN)‘s discount to NAV at its widest since 2015.

Preceding my comments on Can One/Kian Joo, Mahindra and other stubs are the weekly setup/unwind tables for Asia-Pacific Holdcos.

These relationships trade with a minimum liquidity threshold of US$1mn on a 90-day moving average, and a % market capitalisation threshold – the $ value of the holding/opco held, over the parent’s market capitalisation, expressed in percent – of at least 20%.

3. Korean Stubs Spotlight: Close the Pair Trade Between BGF Co. & BGF Retail

On January 8th, 2019, we wrote a report on initiating a pair trade of going long BGF Co Ltd (027410 KS) and going short Bgf Retail (282330 KS). (Korean Stubs Spotlight: A Pair Trade Between BGF Co. & BGF Retail) This trade has worked out well and now we think this is a good time to close this trade.

The return on this pair trade was 7.5%. (This assumes no commission costs, pricing spreads, taxes, or borrowing cost) using closing share price as of January 8th to February 19th, 2019. This trade was made over a period of 42 days so the annualized returns would be nearly 65%. 

It appears that many traders and investors agreed that BGF was excessively undervalued versus BGF Retail early in 2019. Among the factors cited above, the excessive NAV discount to its intrinsic value as well as the market’s overt concerns about the size of the tender offer between BGF and BGF Retail in 2018 appear to be the key factors that drove the share prices of these two firms diverging excessively in 2H 2018 but then converging back to their norms so far in 2019. 

4. TRADE IDEA – Mahindra & Mahindra (MM IN) Stub: Rise

The company that brought the off-road vehicle to post-war India in the 1940s has grown into a leading personal vehicle manufacturer covering land, air and sea. Merely making cars, planes and boats wasn’t ambitious enough for this company though, the conglomerate wouldn’t be complete without a financial services and tech consulting business under the corporate umbrella. 

Indian holding companies typically trade a wider discount to NAV than their East Asian counterparts, however the 42% discount to NAV that Mahindra & Mahindra (MM IN) currently trades at, is a trough level historically for the company. In the body of this insight I will present my case for a stub trade on the company, detailing the business structure, performance and the unlisted stub businesses.

In this insight I will cover:

I. The Trade

II. Group Overview and Stub Business Review

III. My Track Record with Stub Trades

5. Kosaido TOB (7868 JP) Situation Gets Weird – Activists and Independent Opposition to an MBO.

When the Tender Offer / MBO for Kosaido Co Ltd (7868 JP) was announced last month, my first reaction was that this was wrong. It was couched as being management-supportive, had one large independent shareholder agreeing to tender, and the it was touted as an effort to improve the printing and other “info” businesses such as staffing, and similar.

There was no mention of the fact that 94+% of the profits the last few years came from a majority stake in an external company which conducted funeral rites and services across a well-known chain of six large funeral parlours in Tokyo. Neither that company’s name nor the business segment it operates in were mentioned in the document (Japanese only) announcing the intention to conduct the MBO and if you look on the Kosaido website, you have to dig somewhat deeply to figure out that it is even a thing. In the company’s quarterly statements and semi-annual presentations of earnings, there is one line with revenues. One has to go into the fine print of the yukashoken hokokusho to discover more, and if one does, one sees that it is the profitable funeral parlour business which is effectively being purchased at 0.5x book and the rest of the company is being purchased at 1x book. 

I published my original opinion in Smallcap Kosaido (7868 JP) Tender Offer: Wrong Price But Whaddya Gonna Do? suggesting that the only way this was likely to not get done is if some brave activist came forward. I concluded…

• This is a virtual asset strip in progress. It is the kind of thing which gives activist hedge funds a bad name, but when cloaked in the finery of “Private Equity”, it looks like renewal of a business.

• This company is an example of why investors should be spending more time on their stewardship and the governance of their portfolio companies.

• It is also why investors should be taking a very close look at the METI request for public comment on what constitutes “Fair M&A.”

  It is a decent premium but an underwhelming valuation. Because of the premium, and its smallcap nature, I expect this gets done. 

  If deals like this start to not get done, that would be a bullish sign. Investors will finally be taking the blinders off to unfair M&A practices.

Shortly afterwards, an activist did come forward. Long-time Japan activist Yoshiaki Murakami bought 5% through his entity Reno KK, and later lifted his stake (combined with affiliates) to 9.55%. I thought the stock had run too far at that point (¥775/share). While still cheap, I did not expect Bain to lift its price by 30+% and I did not expect a white knight to arrive quickly enough.  This was discussed in Kosaido: Activism Drives Price 30+% Through Terms. 

The New News

In the wee hours of Monday 18 February, with 11 days left to the Tender Offer, toyokeizai.net published an article (partially paywalled) suggesting that the longstanding external auditor Mr. Nakatsuji and lead shareholder Sakurai Mie (descendent of the founder of Kosaido, who originally founded a company called 桜井謄写堂 (Sakurai Transcription) in 1949, which later became Sakurai Kosaido, then just Kosaido) were against the takeover. 

THAT is interesting. And the backstory here is even more interesting.