Energy & Materials Sector

In this briefing:

1. CSE Global: Gaining Momentum
2. Vedanta Resources PLC: Holding Firm Despite Rising Net Debt
3. Last Week in Event SPACE: Rakuten/Lyft, Delta, Kosaido, Ophir, Dairy Crest, Panalpina, BGF

1. CSE Global: Gaining Momentum

• Investors who have bought CSE Global on dips since my last note would have profited ~18%.
• The upbeat guidance by management and supply-demand environment should give some legs to the recent rebound.
• While risks of slower global growth may weigh on the stock, the stock is trading below its five-year average PE despite significantly improved cash flow from operations and a healthy order intake (three-year high). 

2. Vedanta Resources PLC: Holding Firm Despite Rising Net Debt

Vedanta Resources (VED LN) (Vedanta)’s net debt of USD6.4bn for six months ended 30 September 2018 results in a net debt/EBITDA ratio of 3.2x compared to 2.4x a year earlier. We are worried about the company’s rising debt amidst new court orders in India barring it from reopening its subsidiary’s controversial copper plant in the southern state of Tamil Nadu. Vedanta’s subsidiary Vedanta Ltd (VEDL IN) (VL) has also witnessed a sharp decline in its stock price over the past three months due to uncertainty over the plant. Vedanta’s 1HFY19 revenues of USD7.1bn saw a 4% increase compared to the same period last year as a result of higher aluminium sales as well as rising commodity prices. Vedanta’s EBITDA for 1HFY19 stood at USD1.7bn, a 1% increase compared to the same period the year before, driven by the higher oil prices as well as better operating efficiencies. Average production metrics increased across the board, including higher production of oil, aluminium, and steel.

We reiterate our OVERWEIGHT recommendation for the VEDLN complex (21s, 23s and 24s) on its attractive yields versus Indian quasi-sovereign peers and the company’s consistent operating performance.

3. Last Week in Event SPACE: Rakuten/Lyft, Delta, Kosaido, Ophir, Dairy Crest, Panalpina, BGF

Last Week in Event SPACE …

• The question mark over the size of Rakuten Inc (4755 JP)‘s stake in Lyft may be known in the coming two weeks.
• Delta Electronics Thai (DELTA TB)‘s Tender Off document fails to clarify how the FY18 dividend will be treated.
• An activist has come forward, and the external statutory auditor and lead shareholder (wife of founder) are against the offer, but Kosaido Co Ltd (7868 JP) situation still fits pretty cleanly in the “Too Hard” bucket for now.
• Ophir Energy (OPHR LN)‘s shareholders ratchet up their opposition to Medco Energi Internasional T (MEDC IJ)‘s Offer.
• A bump seems envisaged against an already healthy price, but it may not need be a big one to get the Dairy Crest (DCG LN) deal done.
  
• DSV A/S (DSV DC)‘s Offer either comes down to price, or it comes down to loyalty to Panalpina Welttransport Holding (PWTN SW)‘s management.
• The BGF Co Ltd (027410 KS) set up trade has provided a decent return recently, but could still run further.
• Plus CCASS movements and expected upcoming events for key M&A transactions.

(This insight covers specific insights & comments involving Stubs, Pairs, Arbitrage, share Classification and Events – or SPACE – in the past week)

Rakuten Inc (4755 JP) (Mkt Cap: $10.2bn; Liquidity: $51mn)

Since announcing its foray into the deeper waters of being the fourth Type I Mobile Network Operator in Japan, Rakuten’s shares have taken a mighty hit. But the focus in this insight is on ride-sharing company Lyft. In March 2015, Rakuten CEO Hiroshi Mikitani announced that Rakuten had invested US$300mn in Lyft, giving it a 11.9% stake after Series E round in May 2015. Recent articles suggest that Rakuten remains the top investor.

• As best as Travis Lundy can tell, from sources who track this, Rakuten is the single largest shareholder in Lyft, with a holding in the 10.4-12.0% range. That would suggest a position value of US$900mn-$1.2bn based on the last funding round in June 2018. At a $25bn pre-money IPO valuation, that would be worth US$1.5-2.0bn for a likely pre-tax IPO uplift of US$590-800mn. 
• A report late Thursday Asia time suggested the Lyft roadshow would start the week of March 18th, which would mean the S-1 will be available two weeks before that. Investors will know more about Rakuten’s ownership of Lyft by the end of next week or very early the following week. Travis would want to be long for now.

(link to Travis’ insight: Will Rakuten Get A Near-Term Lyft?) 

Doosan Heavy Industries (034020 KS) (Mkt Cap: $868mn; Liquidity: $78.5mn)
Doosan Engineering & Construction (011160 KS) (Mkt Cap: $91mn; Liquidity: $0.4mn)

DHICO announced a larger-than-expected ₩608.4bn rights offer. ₩543bn is expected to be raised through common shares at a preliminary price of ₩6,390; and ₩65bn via RCPS at a preliminary price of ₩6,970. This is a combined 72.56% capital increase a 42.05% share dilution. Concurrently, Doosan E&C announced a ₩420bn rights offer at a preliminary price of ₩1,255, a 15% discount to last close.

• For DHICO, Mar 27 is the ex-rights day for both Common and RCPS. Subscription rights (for the Common) will be listed and trade on Apr 19~25. May 2 is final pricing. May 8 is subscription and May 16 is payment. New Common shares will be listed on May 29.
• For E&C, the final price will be fixed on Apr 30. Whichever is higher – ₩1,255 or Apr 26~30 VWAP at a 40% discount – will be the final offering price. Mar 27 will be the ex-rights day. Subscription rights will be listed and traded on Apr 18~24. New shares will be listed on May 24.
• ₩1,255 is a lot more aggressive than generally viewed. DHICO owns nearly two thirds of E&C. With a 20% oversubscription, nearly ₩300bn will likely come from DHICO, essentially buttressing E&C at an even heftier price. Which is probably why the market is being less harsh on E&C relative to DHICO.

link to Sanghyun Park‘s insights:
Doosan E&C Rights Offer: Conditions & Timetable
DHICO (Doosan Heavy) Rights Offer: Conditions & Timetable.

Delta Electronics Thai (DELTA TB) (Mkt Cap: $2.8bn; Liquidity: $3mn)

The 247-4 Form is out with a tender offer period between 26 Feb-1 April, and payment on the 4th April. The frustrating part is how Delta’s FY18 dividend of Bt2.30 is treated. On one hand, it says the Bt71 Offer price is final unless there is a MAC. Further into the Offer doc, it mentions the Offeror “reserves the right” to reduce the offer price if a dividend is paid. DELTA’s IR believes the dividend will be added, but it is not crystal clear.

• Furthermore, there is no minimum acceptance condition, as potentially flagged earlier, which means there is no possibility of fast-tracking payment. Some precedent voluntary offers included a minimum acceptance, which provides an expedited payment should investors who tender shares AND revoke their right to withdraw – provided that minimum is fulfilled.
• Shares traded up after the document came out, shrugging off the ambiguity in the document. Currently trading at a gross/annualised return of 1.1%/11%. The dividend is subject to a 10% tax for non-residents.

(link to my insight: Delta Thailand’s Tender Offer: Updated Timetable)

M1 Ltd (M1 SP) (Mkt Cap: $1.4bn; Liquidity: $3mn)

The previous Friday, the Offerors for M1 announced that their Offer had been declared Unconditional In All Respects as the tendered amount was 57.04% and the total held by concert parties was 76.35%. Axiata Group (AXIATA MK) made an announcement to the Bursa Malaysia that it had accepted the Offer as required because it was a significant asset disposal. Going unconditional has triggered an extension of the Closing Date to 4 March 2019.

• If you want to fight this with an appraisal, you can. Travis doesn’t see the point. If you want to hold on to the stock in order to block full squeezeout and play chicken with the big boys, you can, but it requires a relatively big ticket (roughly 6.73% of the shares out). 
• So Travis recommends taking the money. It was better to take the money in early January and re-deploy, rather than wait for the close of the offer. He would accept now and sees no upside from waiting.

(link to Travis’ insight: M1 Offer Unconditional as Axiata Tenders)

Kosaido Co Ltd (7868 JP) (Mkt Cap: $160mn; Liquidity: $1mn)

When the Tender Offer / MBO for Kosaido was announced last month, Travis’ first reaction was that this was wrong, concluding this was a virtual asset strip in progress, and suggested that the only way this was likely to not get done is if some brave activist came forward.

• Shortly afterwards, an activist did come forward. Yoshiaki Murakami’s bought 5% through his entity Reno KK, and later lifted his stake (combined with affiliates) to 9.55%. Travis thought the stock had run too far at that point (¥775/share). While still cheap, he did not expect Bain to lift its price by 30+%, nor a white knight to arrive quickly enough. 
• This week a media article suggested longstanding external statutory auditor Mr. Nakatsuji and lead shareholder Sakurai Mie were against the takeover.
• The possibility this deal fails because the “put protection” of the deal price at ¥610 is no longer solid has gone up. Conversely, the probability that Bain and the MBO have to come in with a price adjustment higher has gone up. Travis is inclined to remain bearish in the medium-term as there is a significant likelihood there is no alternative solution during the Tender Offer period itself. 

(link to Travis’ insight: Kosaido TOB (7868 JP) Situation Gets Weird – Activists and Independent Opposition to an MBO)

Briefly …

• After announcing earlier this month a number of indicative non-binding bids were received for a “whole of company transaction”, the AFR is now reporting (paywalled) that Lone Star has also joined the battle for Aveo Group (AOG AU). (A Case for Privatising Aveo)
• Xingfa Aluminium (98 HK) announced both China Lesso Group Holdings (2128 HK) (26.3% shareholder) and Sure Keen (11.5%, ED Liao Yuqing’s vehicle), collectively holding  37.81% of shares out, will NOT tender their shares into the offer. (Guangxin Reloads A Peculiar Low-Ball Offer For Xingfa Aluminium)

Dairy Crest (DCG LN) (Mkt Cap: $1.3bn; Liquidity: $4.5mn)

Saputo Inc (SAP CN) and Dairy Crest announced an all-cash deal where Saputo will buy Dairy Crest for 620p/share, to be implemented through a Scheme of Arrangement with an expected close in Q2 2019. This appears to tick all the necessary boxes. Friendly, horizontal integration, and limited job losses. Shares are trading through terms early (he published at 628.5p), perhaps on expectations the wide open register means shareholders can try to hold out for a higher price.

• At almost 14x EV/EBITDA on a TTM basis and a bit lower on a March 2019 FY-end basis, it is a high enough multiple to not be insulting for a dairy company, and may keep other suitors away.
• Dairy Crest’s directors have given irrevocable notice to accept, and the directors’ advisors (Greenhill & Co) have deemed the Offer “fair and reasonable.”
• One extra turn of EV/EBITDA would lift the takeover price just under 10%. That would clear out most of the naysayers who bought in the frothier “we’re going to be an asset-light branded goods company” days of 2015-2017.  Doable, but as it is an agreed deal, Travis doesn’t see the need to push it. 

(link to Travis’ insight: Saputo to Buy Crest Dairy; Initial Market Response Wants a Bump)

Ophir Energy (OPHR LN) (Mkt Cap: $509mn; Liquidity: $6mn)

Petrus Advisors (3.5% shareholder) has dialed up the pressure on its opposition to Medco Energi Internasional T (MEDC IJ)‘s £0.55/share offer for Ophir Energy (OPHR LN), specifically calling into question Bill Schrader’s (Ophir’s Chairman) business acumen.

• In its prior letter to Ophir on the 14 January, Petrus recommended selling the South-East Asian (SEA) assets to Medco, with a low-end fair value, before synergies, of £0.64/share, through to £1.42/share on a blue sky basis. It also argued that Ophir should negotiate with the Equatorial Guinea ministry (the regulator that terminated the Fortuna license, resulting in write-offs of US$610mn) to be compensated for its $700mn investment and the unfair seizure of the license, otherwise it would set a precedent for other international operators doing business in EG.
• Petrus has now rounded on Schrader over perceived mismanagement of the EG licence, and a lack of professionalism in not soliciting and considering offers for Ophir from other buyers. Petrus’ beef is not an outlier –  alternative hedge fund Sand Grove has increased its exposure, via cash-settled derivatives, to 17.28% (as at 13 February); while Ian Hannam, who advised Ophir’s board on its 2013 right issue, is understood to have also written to Ophir’s interim CEO Alan Booth and the board saying Medco’s offer is too low.
• Overall, Petrus’ assertions that Ophir is being sold at “sub optimal terms” appear valid, most notably on the EG compensation and the illogical operations update earlier this month. The alternative push to sell the SEA assets separately, as that has been Medco’s core focus, not international operations, also makes sense.

(link to my insight: Petrus Doubles Down On Ophir Energy)

Panalpina Welttransport Holding (PWTN SW) (Mkt Cap: $3.7bn; Liquidity: $22mn)

Last month, DSV A/S (DSV DC) made a public proposal of a takeover for cash and scrip valued at CHF 170/share, which came at a 24% premium to last and +31% vs 1-month VWAP. The #2, #3, and long-time #4 shareholders are firmly and publicly in the camp of trying to get something done.  45.9%-shareholder Ernst Göhner Foundation is sending mixed signals – do they want a higher price? Or do they want to wait and let Panalpina grow by its own consolidator strategy?

• Panalpina has now confirmed that it in preliminary talks with Kuwait-listed logistics company Agility Public Warehouse. A Bloomberg report suggested a deal could be reached as early as this past week for Agility’s logistics business. The same article suggested the Göhner Foundation is supportive of the new talks. Agility’s press release was much more non-committal.
• DSV has also announced a new all cash CHF 180/share offer for Panalpina; although the original cash and scrip offer was then worth CHF 184.5/share, which is an even better premium to pre-offer terms. One wonders whether cash-only would suit the Foundation; the DSV press release seemed to respond to that.
• It is not clear what would drive the Foundation to give up its control. And Panalpina’s measly share price reaction to the all-cash offer suggest there is considerable skepticism out there. But at some price, Panalpina’s board looks pretty stupid to not accept the cash.
• If you do not think a deal with DSV has any chance of getting up, Panalpina shares are a sell here. If they overpay for Agility and cannot improve their own margins well past historical highs in a market trending weaker, then the shares could drop. 

(link to Travis’ insight: The Panalpina Conundrum)

Mahindra & Mahindra (MM IN) 

Curtis Lehnert backs out a discount to NAV of 42%, the widest since at least 2015. His proposal to structure the trade is to use a market-cap weighted hedge on the two largest listed subsidiaries, Tech Mahindra (TECHM IN) and Mahindra & Mahindra Fin Services Ltd. (MMFS IN) along with a core business hedge using Maruti Suzuki India (MSIL IN) to hedge the core automotive business. 

• Using Curtis’ figures, the implied stub is at its lowest level since a brief downward spike in February 2015, and you would have to go back to April 2014 to find a lower level.
• The push back on this setup is that the auto operations have recorded marginally, yet sequential profit declines in FY16 and FY17; while recording three sequential quarterly declines up to December 2018. The big question is whether Mahindra can regain market share as it kick-starts a new model cycle.

(link to Curtis’ insight: TRADE IDEA – Mahindra & Mahindra (MM IN) Stub: Rise)

BGF Co Ltd (027410 KS) / Bgf Retail (282330 KS)

On January 8th, Douglas Kim initiated a setup trade of going long BGF Co and going short BGF Retail. (Korean Stubs Spotlight: A Pair Trade Between BGF Co. & BGF Retail) This setup has worked out well (7.5% return) and he now think this is a good time to close the trade.

• In contrast, Sanghyun believes the Holdco is still undervalued relative to the Sub by about 10%. Plugging in Sanghyun’s numbers, I back out a discount to NAV of 45% against a one-year average of 30%, with a 12-month range of -51.5% to 15.5% (premium).

links to:
Douglas’ insight: Korean Stubs Spotlight: Close the Pair Trade Between BGF Co. & BGF Retail
Sanghyun’s insight: BGF Duo Stub Trade: Short Sub / Long Holdco with a Very Short-Term Horizon

Can One Bhd (CAN MK) / Kian Joo Can Factory (KJC MK)

Back on the 13 December 2018, Can One announced a proposed MGO for Kian Joo at RM3.10/share, a 52.7% premium to last close. This required Can One shareholders’ approval which was received on the 14 February. Can One’s current 33% stake in Kian Joo accounts for ~86% of its market cap. The offer doc should be out, on or before the 7 March, with payment either late March (along with the first close of the Offer), or early April, depending on when the offer turns unconditional. The offer is conditional on 50% acceptance. Both sides are illiquid.

• This looks like a decent exit for Kian Joo shareholders. Apart from EPF with 10.1%, former NED Teow China See is the only other shareholder with >5% with 8.9%.
• For Can One, this is an aggressive pitch to make Kian Joo a subsidiary amidst an uncertain economic backdrop, while potential synergies may be offset via higher interest costs.

(link to my insight: StubWorld: Can One’s Offer For Kian Joo Can; Mahindra At Possible Set-Up Levels)

Briefly …

• Sanghyun recommended long Hansae Yes24 Holdings Co, Ltd. (016450 KS), short Hansae Co Ltd (105630 KS), now that the Holdco/Sub ratio  is at -227% of σ or a 120D low. Using his numbers, I see the discount to NAV at 49% against a one-year average of 44%; while the implied stub is at a one-year low. (link to Sanghyun’s insight: Hansae Holdco/Sub Trade: Huge Divergence Now, Sub Price Rally Should Be Resisted Here)

Hyundai Glovis (086280 KS) / Hyundai Mobis (012330 KS)

There are still two schools of thought on the HMG restructuring. One is that Glovis/Mobis are merged into a holdco entity. Or Glovis becomes the holdco with Mobis→ HM→ Kia Motors Corp (000270 KS) below. Since late 3Q18, there has been increased speculation on the latter. This has pushed up Glovis’ price relative to Mobis.

• Each outcome is beset with its own set of issues. For Glovis to be the sole holdco, it has to come up with nearly ₩2tn to buy Kia’s Mobis stake, probably through new, and burdensome, debt.  Glovis may also face the risk of forced holdco conversion, creating an issue with Kia as a “great grandson” subsidiary.
• This speculation pushing up Glovis relative to Mobis has yet to be substantiated/justified, suggesting Glovis is overbought. Sanghyun expects a mean reversion, and recommends a long Mobis and short Glovis.

(link to Sanghyun’s insight: Glovis/Mobis Pair Trade: Glovis Being Overpriced Relative to Mobis on Unsubstantiated Speculation)

• Navitas Ltd (NVT AU) has agreed to extend the exclusivity period granted to the BGH consortium to 1 March (from 18 Feb), in order to allow additional time for BGH to complete a limited set of remaining due diligence investigations.

• Hopewell Holdings (54 HK) and the Offeror are still in the course of finalising the information to be included in the Scheme Document. No date for the dispatch has been announced.

• ESR’s offer for Propertylink Group (PLG AU) has turned unconditional after Centuria Capital (CNI AU) tendered. 

• The composite doc for Harbin Electric Co Ltd H (1133 HK), initially due out this past week, has been further postponed until the 29 March – on or before – ostensibly to incorporate the FY18 financials.

• Netcomm Wireless (NTC AU) has received $1.10 cash offer (53% premium to last close) from Casa Systems (CASA US) via a Scheme.  The deal values Netcomm at ~US$114m. The scheme is subject to FIRB and shareholder approval. Stewart David Paul James, a NED,  holds 12.3% and is the major shareholder. The announcement states that each Netcomm director intends to vote the Netcomm shares held by them in favour of the scheme – subject to a +ve IFA opinion and in the absence of a competing offer. This includes Stewart’s stake.

• MYOB Group Ltd (MYO AU) announced no superior proposal emerged after concluding its ’go shop’ period for rival offers to KKR’s takeover proposal.  At a gross/annualised spread of 0.9%/4.8%, assuming early May payment, this looks to be trading a bit tight.

My ongoing series flags large moves (~10%) in CCASS holdings over the past week or so, moves which are often outside normal market transactions.  These may be indicative of share pledges.  Or potential takeovers. Or simply help understand volume swings. 

Often these moves can easily be explained – the placement of new shares, rights issue, movements subsequent to a takeover, amongst others. For those mentioned below, I could not find an obvious reason for the CCASS move.   

In this briefing:

1. Kosmos Energy: The Standout Internationally-Focused E&P Company
2. Medco’s Bump For Ophir Won’t Sway Petrus
3. Weekly Oil Views: Crude Rallies to Four-Month High but Lacks Staying Power
4. Vodafone Idea Needs a 55% Price Increase to Return to Viability
5. Yokogawa Electric (6841 JP): A Less Risky Investment in LNG Engineering

1. Kosmos Energy: The Standout Internationally-Focused E&P Company

We think that Kosmos Energy (KOS US) offers everything that is required from an internationally focused E&P company. It has a highly rated management team, strong balance sheet and free cash flow generation from its existing producing assets, low risk / high value near field exploration potential, selective high risk / reward frontier exploration in which it has a proven track record, it has done recent value accretive acquisitions with room for more, it has demonstrated the ability to farm-down its assets on multiple occasions and is currently in the process of a major asset sell down, which could surprise the market to the upside. Despite this the stock trades on a significant discount to risked NAV, making it a potential acquisition target and has plenty of catalysts coming up this year to close the valuation gap.  

2. Medco’s Bump For Ophir Won’t Sway Petrus

The boards of Medco Energi Internasional T (MEDC IJ) and Ophir Energy (OPHR LN) have agreed to increase the Offer price to £0.575 from £0.55, representing a 73.2% premium to the undisturbed price.

All other details of the scheme remain unchanged. The court meeting is to take place on the 25 March, while the long stop is the 20 June – unless both companies agree to an extension.

On Petrus

Petrus has yet to respond to the Offer increase; however, it would be surprising if its stance against the takeover has altered. 

In its prior letter to Ophir on the 14 January, Petrus recommended selling the South-East Asian (SEA) assets to Medco – excluding the Tanzanian and Mexican investments – with a low-end fair value, before synergies, of £0.64/share, through to £1.42/share on a blue sky basis.

Shortly before the increase, Petrus was quoted (paywalled) it would vote its 3.95% against the takeover, while adding “Our satisfaction with the value our board deems as satisfactory has decreased further“, with reference to the release of Ophir’s full-year results on the 12 March.

On Sand Grove/Coro

Subsequent to the bump, Coro Energy PLC (CORO LN), which had previously submitted a non-binding cash/scrip reverse takeover offer on the 8 March, declared it has no intention to bid.

Sand Grove has also announced it has given an irrevocable undertaking to vote its 18.73% in favour of the scheme. Coro held discussions with Sand Grove before abandoning its bid.

Trading Tight – Upside Less Assured

Medco’s Offer is conditional on 75%+ approval from Ophir’s shareholders, which appears less tenuous following the 4.5% bump and Sand Grove’s irrevocable undertaking. While I consider the offer for Ophir sub-optimal – and shares have closed above terms on 30% of the trading days since Medco’s initial offer – Petrus alone cannot disrupt the vote. Of note, the next three largest shareholders behind Sand Grove have reduced their holdings since end-December 2018.

The gross/annualised spread is tight at 0.7%/2.6%, assuming early-July payment. The risk/reward in punting at or just below terms is now less attractive following this Offer Price increase and the irrevocable undertaking.

3. Weekly Oil Views: Crude Rallies to Four-Month High but Lacks Staying Power

Tightening supply fundamentals are starting to take centre-stage in the oil market, and briefly sent crude to a four-month high last week. But just as Brent crossed $68 during intraday trading and market watchers began to wonder if it was going to breach $70, the benchmark slipped down a few notches.

 Crude’s jagged ascent has become a feature since the start of this year, making every upward surge feel tentative. The selling pressure that seized the crude market in the fourth quarter of last year is not yet done. Every rally seems to have plenty of skeptics waiting to sell into it.

Aside from OPEC’s output curbs, which surpassed 100% compliance in February, production from at least two producers not bound by quotas is under threat. Crude output in Venezuela, crippled by a major power outage for more than a week now, has plummeted, while the US says it wants to force Iranian crude exports to below 1 million b/d when the current batch of sanctions waivers expire at the start of May.

 A US-China trade deal looks certain, even though the signing may be pushed back to April…or maybe June. However, economic worries elsewhere continue to weigh on oil market sentiment and demand growth expectations.

OPEC appears determined to stay the course with its production cuts in conjunction with its non-OPEC allies. But it sees non-OPEC supply growth this year dwarfing demand growth by nearly 1.1 million b/d, and is feeling the burden of rebalancing the market once again on its shoulders.

This week, we also discuss: 

• What jumped out at us in the IEA’s annual report
• US EIA lowering its production forecasts
• WTI Houston’s emergence as US crude benchmark

We note the controversial decision by Norway’s sovereign wealth fund to unwind its holdings in the upstream oil and gas sector, a topic we will be tackling in the next edition of Weekly Oil Views. 

4. Vodafone Idea Needs a 55% Price Increase to Return to Viability

Underlying profitability continues to deteriorate at Vodafone Idea (IDEA IN) (IDEA). Chris Hoare has updated his liquidity analysis, and estimates that IDEA needs prices to rise by over 50% to hit cash flow break-even in the medium term. That needs market behavior to change from Jio in particular. Bulls will point to IDEA’s current capital raising and the large capital raising planned at Bharti Airtel (BHARTI IN) as signalling a possible end to hostilities. However, the math at IDEA is such that even a $3.5bn injection gives only temporary relief. What they really need are price increases. Without them (and even with the capital increase), Chris thinks IDEA runs out of cash in about 2 years. We retain our Reduce recommendation and cut our price target to INR16.

5. Yokogawa Electric (6841 JP): A Less Risky Investment in LNG Engineering

Yokogawa Electric is one of the world’s leading suppliers of distributed control systems (DCS) used in the LNG, oil & gas, petrochemical and other industries. It is particularly strong in LNG, having provided control systems for dozens of liquefaction trains, LNG carriers and re-gasification plants.

Unlike Chiyoda Corporation (6366 JP) and JGC (1963 JP), which depend on a small number of large engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) orders, which can be as large as ¥500 billion, Yokogawa only rarely receives an order as large as ¥10 billion and most of its orders are less than ¥1 billion. It is geared primarily to ongoing investments and operating expenditures in its user industries, less exposed to highly variable orders for large LNG and other engineering projects, and relatively immune to cost overruns and other problems at projects gone wrong.

Margins have expanded over the past several years due to a combination of restructuring and technological advance. Unprofitable non-core businesses have been abandoned or sold, high-wage domestic employees retired, and administration, manufacturing and logistics rationalized. Enterprise and robotic process automation (RPA) software have been introduced and an Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) cloud computing platform is under development.  Top-line growth has been slow, but the operating margin has risen from from 5.0% in FY Mar-12 to 8.0% in FY Mar-18, and should reach 10% in FY Mar-21, in our estimation.

At ¥2,215 (Wednesday, March 13 closing price), the shares are selling at 23x our EPS estimate for FY Mar-19 and 20x our estimate for FY Mar-21. Projected EV/EBITDA multiples for the same two years are 9.8x and 8.2x. These and other projected valuation multiples are above their recent historical averages, but indicate upside potential of 20% or more if the anticipated upturn in new LNG investments materializes. Investors willing to take on more speculative risk should look at Chiyoda and JGC.

In this briefing:

1. Vedanta Resources PLC: Holding Firm Despite Rising Net Debt
2. Last Week in Event SPACE: Rakuten/Lyft, Delta, Kosaido, Ophir, Dairy Crest, Panalpina, BGF

1. Vedanta Resources PLC: Holding Firm Despite Rising Net Debt

Vedanta Resources (VED LN) (Vedanta)’s net debt of USD6.4bn for six months ended 30 September 2018 results in a net debt/EBITDA ratio of 3.2x compared to 2.4x a year earlier. We are worried about the company’s rising debt amidst new court orders in India barring it from reopening its subsidiary’s controversial copper plant in the southern state of Tamil Nadu. Vedanta’s subsidiary Vedanta Ltd (VEDL IN) (VL) has also witnessed a sharp decline in its stock price over the past three months due to uncertainty over the plant. Vedanta’s 1HFY19 revenues of USD7.1bn saw a 4% increase compared to the same period last year as a result of higher aluminium sales as well as rising commodity prices. Vedanta’s EBITDA for 1HFY19 stood at USD1.7bn, a 1% increase compared to the same period the year before, driven by the higher oil prices as well as better operating efficiencies. Average production metrics increased across the board, including higher production of oil, aluminium, and steel.

We reiterate our OVERWEIGHT recommendation for the VEDLN complex (21s, 23s and 24s) on its attractive yields versus Indian quasi-sovereign peers and the company’s consistent operating performance.

2. Last Week in Event SPACE: Rakuten/Lyft, Delta, Kosaido, Ophir, Dairy Crest, Panalpina, BGF

Last Week in Event SPACE …

• The question mark over the size of Rakuten Inc (4755 JP)‘s stake in Lyft may be known in the coming two weeks.
• Delta Electronics Thai (DELTA TB)‘s Tender Off document fails to clarify how the FY18 dividend will be treated.
• An activist has come forward, and the external statutory auditor and lead shareholder (wife of founder) are against the offer, but Kosaido Co Ltd (7868 JP) situation still fits pretty cleanly in the “Too Hard” bucket for now.
• Ophir Energy (OPHR LN)‘s shareholders ratchet up their opposition to Medco Energi Internasional T (MEDC IJ)‘s Offer.
• A bump seems envisaged against an already healthy price, but it may not need be a big one to get the Dairy Crest (DCG LN) deal done.
  
• DSV A/S (DSV DC)‘s Offer either comes down to price, or it comes down to loyalty to Panalpina Welttransport Holding (PWTN SW)‘s management.
• The BGF Co Ltd (027410 KS) set up trade has provided a decent return recently, but could still run further.
• Plus CCASS movements and expected upcoming events for key M&A transactions.

(This insight covers specific insights & comments involving Stubs, Pairs, Arbitrage, share Classification and Events – or SPACE – in the past week)

Rakuten Inc (4755 JP) (Mkt Cap: $10.2bn; Liquidity: $51mn)

Since announcing its foray into the deeper waters of being the fourth Type I Mobile Network Operator in Japan, Rakuten’s shares have taken a mighty hit. But the focus in this insight is on ride-sharing company Lyft. In March 2015, Rakuten CEO Hiroshi Mikitani announced that Rakuten had invested US$300mn in Lyft, giving it a 11.9% stake after Series E round in May 2015. Recent articles suggest that Rakuten remains the top investor.

• As best as Travis Lundy can tell, from sources who track this, Rakuten is the single largest shareholder in Lyft, with a holding in the 10.4-12.0% range. That would suggest a position value of US$900mn-$1.2bn based on the last funding round in June 2018. At a $25bn pre-money IPO valuation, that would be worth US$1.5-2.0bn for a likely pre-tax IPO uplift of US$590-800mn. 
• A report late Thursday Asia time suggested the Lyft roadshow would start the week of March 18th, which would mean the S-1 will be available two weeks before that. Investors will know more about Rakuten’s ownership of Lyft by the end of next week or very early the following week. Travis would want to be long for now.

(link to Travis’ insight: Will Rakuten Get A Near-Term Lyft?) 

Doosan Heavy Industries (034020 KS) (Mkt Cap: $868mn; Liquidity: $78.5mn)
Doosan Engineering & Construction (011160 KS) (Mkt Cap: $91mn; Liquidity: $0.4mn)

DHICO announced a larger-than-expected ₩608.4bn rights offer. ₩543bn is expected to be raised through common shares at a preliminary price of ₩6,390; and ₩65bn via RCPS at a preliminary price of ₩6,970. This is a combined 72.56% capital increase a 42.05% share dilution. Concurrently, Doosan E&C announced a ₩420bn rights offer at a preliminary price of ₩1,255, a 15% discount to last close.

• For DHICO, Mar 27 is the ex-rights day for both Common and RCPS. Subscription rights (for the Common) will be listed and trade on Apr 19~25. May 2 is final pricing. May 8 is subscription and May 16 is payment. New Common shares will be listed on May 29.
• For E&C, the final price will be fixed on Apr 30. Whichever is higher – ₩1,255 or Apr 26~30 VWAP at a 40% discount – will be the final offering price. Mar 27 will be the ex-rights day. Subscription rights will be listed and traded on Apr 18~24. New shares will be listed on May 24.
• ₩1,255 is a lot more aggressive than generally viewed. DHICO owns nearly two thirds of E&C. With a 20% oversubscription, nearly ₩300bn will likely come from DHICO, essentially buttressing E&C at an even heftier price. Which is probably why the market is being less harsh on E&C relative to DHICO.

link to Sanghyun Park‘s insights:
Doosan E&C Rights Offer: Conditions & Timetable
DHICO (Doosan Heavy) Rights Offer: Conditions & Timetable.

Delta Electronics Thai (DELTA TB) (Mkt Cap: $2.8bn; Liquidity: $3mn)

The 247-4 Form is out with a tender offer period between 26 Feb-1 April, and payment on the 4th April. The frustrating part is how Delta’s FY18 dividend of Bt2.30 is treated. On one hand, it says the Bt71 Offer price is final unless there is a MAC. Further into the Offer doc, it mentions the Offeror “reserves the right” to reduce the offer price if a dividend is paid. DELTA’s IR believes the dividend will be added, but it is not crystal clear.

• Furthermore, there is no minimum acceptance condition, as potentially flagged earlier, which means there is no possibility of fast-tracking payment. Some precedent voluntary offers included a minimum acceptance, which provides an expedited payment should investors who tender shares AND revoke their right to withdraw – provided that minimum is fulfilled.
• Shares traded up after the document came out, shrugging off the ambiguity in the document. Currently trading at a gross/annualised return of 1.1%/11%. The dividend is subject to a 10% tax for non-residents.

(link to my insight: Delta Thailand’s Tender Offer: Updated Timetable)

M1 Ltd (M1 SP) (Mkt Cap: $1.4bn; Liquidity: $3mn)

The previous Friday, the Offerors for M1 announced that their Offer had been declared Unconditional In All Respects as the tendered amount was 57.04% and the total held by concert parties was 76.35%. Axiata Group (AXIATA MK) made an announcement to the Bursa Malaysia that it had accepted the Offer as required because it was a significant asset disposal. Going unconditional has triggered an extension of the Closing Date to 4 March 2019.

• If you want to fight this with an appraisal, you can. Travis doesn’t see the point. If you want to hold on to the stock in order to block full squeezeout and play chicken with the big boys, you can, but it requires a relatively big ticket (roughly 6.73% of the shares out). 
• So Travis recommends taking the money. It was better to take the money in early January and re-deploy, rather than wait for the close of the offer. He would accept now and sees no upside from waiting.

(link to Travis’ insight: M1 Offer Unconditional as Axiata Tenders)

Kosaido Co Ltd (7868 JP) (Mkt Cap: $160mn; Liquidity: $1mn)

When the Tender Offer / MBO for Kosaido was announced last month, Travis’ first reaction was that this was wrong, concluding this was a virtual asset strip in progress, and suggested that the only way this was likely to not get done is if some brave activist came forward.

• Shortly afterwards, an activist did come forward. Yoshiaki Murakami’s bought 5% through his entity Reno KK, and later lifted his stake (combined with affiliates) to 9.55%. Travis thought the stock had run too far at that point (¥775/share). While still cheap, he did not expect Bain to lift its price by 30+%, nor a white knight to arrive quickly enough. 
• This week a media article suggested longstanding external statutory auditor Mr. Nakatsuji and lead shareholder Sakurai Mie were against the takeover.
• The possibility this deal fails because the “put protection” of the deal price at ¥610 is no longer solid has gone up. Conversely, the probability that Bain and the MBO have to come in with a price adjustment higher has gone up. Travis is inclined to remain bearish in the medium-term as there is a significant likelihood there is no alternative solution during the Tender Offer period itself. 

(link to Travis’ insight: Kosaido TOB (7868 JP) Situation Gets Weird – Activists and Independent Opposition to an MBO)

Briefly …

• After announcing earlier this month a number of indicative non-binding bids were received for a “whole of company transaction”, the AFR is now reporting (paywalled) that Lone Star has also joined the battle for Aveo Group (AOG AU). (A Case for Privatising Aveo)
• Xingfa Aluminium (98 HK) announced both China Lesso Group Holdings (2128 HK) (26.3% shareholder) and Sure Keen (11.5%, ED Liao Yuqing’s vehicle), collectively holding  37.81% of shares out, will NOT tender their shares into the offer. (Guangxin Reloads A Peculiar Low-Ball Offer For Xingfa Aluminium)

Dairy Crest (DCG LN) (Mkt Cap: $1.3bn; Liquidity: $4.5mn)

Saputo Inc (SAP CN) and Dairy Crest announced an all-cash deal where Saputo will buy Dairy Crest for 620p/share, to be implemented through a Scheme of Arrangement with an expected close in Q2 2019. This appears to tick all the necessary boxes. Friendly, horizontal integration, and limited job losses. Shares are trading through terms early (he published at 628.5p), perhaps on expectations the wide open register means shareholders can try to hold out for a higher price.

• At almost 14x EV/EBITDA on a TTM basis and a bit lower on a March 2019 FY-end basis, it is a high enough multiple to not be insulting for a dairy company, and may keep other suitors away.
• Dairy Crest’s directors have given irrevocable notice to accept, and the directors’ advisors (Greenhill & Co) have deemed the Offer “fair and reasonable.”
• One extra turn of EV/EBITDA would lift the takeover price just under 10%. That would clear out most of the naysayers who bought in the frothier “we’re going to be an asset-light branded goods company” days of 2015-2017.  Doable, but as it is an agreed deal, Travis doesn’t see the need to push it. 

(link to Travis’ insight: Saputo to Buy Crest Dairy; Initial Market Response Wants a Bump)

Ophir Energy (OPHR LN) (Mkt Cap: $509mn; Liquidity: $6mn)

Petrus Advisors (3.5% shareholder) has dialed up the pressure on its opposition to Medco Energi Internasional T (MEDC IJ)‘s £0.55/share offer for Ophir Energy (OPHR LN), specifically calling into question Bill Schrader’s (Ophir’s Chairman) business acumen.

• In its prior letter to Ophir on the 14 January, Petrus recommended selling the South-East Asian (SEA) assets to Medco, with a low-end fair value, before synergies, of £0.64/share, through to £1.42/share on a blue sky basis. It also argued that Ophir should negotiate with the Equatorial Guinea ministry (the regulator that terminated the Fortuna license, resulting in write-offs of US$610mn) to be compensated for its $700mn investment and the unfair seizure of the license, otherwise it would set a precedent for other international operators doing business in EG.
• Petrus has now rounded on Schrader over perceived mismanagement of the EG licence, and a lack of professionalism in not soliciting and considering offers for Ophir from other buyers. Petrus’ beef is not an outlier –  alternative hedge fund Sand Grove has increased its exposure, via cash-settled derivatives, to 17.28% (as at 13 February); while Ian Hannam, who advised Ophir’s board on its 2013 right issue, is understood to have also written to Ophir’s interim CEO Alan Booth and the board saying Medco’s offer is too low.
• Overall, Petrus’ assertions that Ophir is being sold at “sub optimal terms” appear valid, most notably on the EG compensation and the illogical operations update earlier this month. The alternative push to sell the SEA assets separately, as that has been Medco’s core focus, not international operations, also makes sense.

(link to my insight: Petrus Doubles Down On Ophir Energy)

Panalpina Welttransport Holding (PWTN SW) (Mkt Cap: $3.7bn; Liquidity: $22mn)

Last month, DSV A/S (DSV DC) made a public proposal of a takeover for cash and scrip valued at CHF 170/share, which came at a 24% premium to last and +31% vs 1-month VWAP. The #2, #3, and long-time #4 shareholders are firmly and publicly in the camp of trying to get something done.  45.9%-shareholder Ernst Göhner Foundation is sending mixed signals – do they want a higher price? Or do they want to wait and let Panalpina grow by its own consolidator strategy?

• Panalpina has now confirmed that it in preliminary talks with Kuwait-listed logistics company Agility Public Warehouse. A Bloomberg report suggested a deal could be reached as early as this past week for Agility’s logistics business. The same article suggested the Göhner Foundation is supportive of the new talks. Agility’s press release was much more non-committal.
• DSV has also announced a new all cash CHF 180/share offer for Panalpina; although the original cash and scrip offer was then worth CHF 184.5/share, which is an even better premium to pre-offer terms. One wonders whether cash-only would suit the Foundation; the DSV press release seemed to respond to that.
• It is not clear what would drive the Foundation to give up its control. And Panalpina’s measly share price reaction to the all-cash offer suggest there is considerable skepticism out there. But at some price, Panalpina’s board looks pretty stupid to not accept the cash.
• If you do not think a deal with DSV has any chance of getting up, Panalpina shares are a sell here. If they overpay for Agility and cannot improve their own margins well past historical highs in a market trending weaker, then the shares could drop. 

(link to Travis’ insight: The Panalpina Conundrum)

Mahindra & Mahindra (MM IN) 

Curtis Lehnert backs out a discount to NAV of 42%, the widest since at least 2015. His proposal to structure the trade is to use a market-cap weighted hedge on the two largest listed subsidiaries, Tech Mahindra (TECHM IN) and Mahindra & Mahindra Fin Services Ltd. (MMFS IN) along with a core business hedge using Maruti Suzuki India (MSIL IN) to hedge the core automotive business. 

• Using Curtis’ figures, the implied stub is at its lowest level since a brief downward spike in February 2015, and you would have to go back to April 2014 to find a lower level.
• The push back on this setup is that the auto operations have recorded marginally, yet sequential profit declines in FY16 and FY17; while recording three sequential quarterly declines up to December 2018. The big question is whether Mahindra can regain market share as it kick-starts a new model cycle.

(link to Curtis’ insight: TRADE IDEA – Mahindra & Mahindra (MM IN) Stub: Rise)

BGF Co Ltd (027410 KS) / Bgf Retail (282330 KS)

On January 8th, Douglas Kim initiated a setup trade of going long BGF Co and going short BGF Retail. (Korean Stubs Spotlight: A Pair Trade Between BGF Co. & BGF Retail) This setup has worked out well (7.5% return) and he now think this is a good time to close the trade.

• In contrast, Sanghyun believes the Holdco is still undervalued relative to the Sub by about 10%. Plugging in Sanghyun’s numbers, I back out a discount to NAV of 45% against a one-year average of 30%, with a 12-month range of -51.5% to 15.5% (premium).

links to:
Douglas’ insight: Korean Stubs Spotlight: Close the Pair Trade Between BGF Co. & BGF Retail
Sanghyun’s insight: BGF Duo Stub Trade: Short Sub / Long Holdco with a Very Short-Term Horizon

Can One Bhd (CAN MK) / Kian Joo Can Factory (KJC MK)

Back on the 13 December 2018, Can One announced a proposed MGO for Kian Joo at RM3.10/share, a 52.7% premium to last close. This required Can One shareholders’ approval which was received on the 14 February. Can One’s current 33% stake in Kian Joo accounts for ~86% of its market cap. The offer doc should be out, on or before the 7 March, with payment either late March (along with the first close of the Offer), or early April, depending on when the offer turns unconditional. The offer is conditional on 50% acceptance. Both sides are illiquid.

• This looks like a decent exit for Kian Joo shareholders. Apart from EPF with 10.1%, former NED Teow China See is the only other shareholder with >5% with 8.9%.
• For Can One, this is an aggressive pitch to make Kian Joo a subsidiary amidst an uncertain economic backdrop, while potential synergies may be offset via higher interest costs.

(link to my insight: StubWorld: Can One’s Offer For Kian Joo Can; Mahindra At Possible Set-Up Levels)

Briefly …

• Sanghyun recommended long Hansae Yes24 Holdings Co, Ltd. (016450 KS), short Hansae Co Ltd (105630 KS), now that the Holdco/Sub ratio  is at -227% of σ or a 120D low. Using his numbers, I see the discount to NAV at 49% against a one-year average of 44%; while the implied stub is at a one-year low. (link to Sanghyun’s insight: Hansae Holdco/Sub Trade: Huge Divergence Now, Sub Price Rally Should Be Resisted Here)

Hyundai Glovis (086280 KS) / Hyundai Mobis (012330 KS)

There are still two schools of thought on the HMG restructuring. One is that Glovis/Mobis are merged into a holdco entity. Or Glovis becomes the holdco with Mobis→ HM→ Kia Motors Corp (000270 KS) below. Since late 3Q18, there has been increased speculation on the latter. This has pushed up Glovis’ price relative to Mobis.

• Each outcome is beset with its own set of issues. For Glovis to be the sole holdco, it has to come up with nearly ₩2tn to buy Kia’s Mobis stake, probably through new, and burdensome, debt.  Glovis may also face the risk of forced holdco conversion, creating an issue with Kia as a “great grandson” subsidiary.
• This speculation pushing up Glovis relative to Mobis has yet to be substantiated/justified, suggesting Glovis is overbought. Sanghyun expects a mean reversion, and recommends a long Mobis and short Glovis.

(link to Sanghyun’s insight: Glovis/Mobis Pair Trade: Glovis Being Overpriced Relative to Mobis on Unsubstantiated Speculation)

• Navitas Ltd (NVT AU) has agreed to extend the exclusivity period granted to the BGH consortium to 1 March (from 18 Feb), in order to allow additional time for BGH to complete a limited set of remaining due diligence investigations.

• Hopewell Holdings (54 HK) and the Offeror are still in the course of finalising the information to be included in the Scheme Document. No date for the dispatch has been announced.

• ESR’s offer for Propertylink Group (PLG AU) has turned unconditional after Centuria Capital (CNI AU) tendered. 

• The composite doc for Harbin Electric Co Ltd H (1133 HK), initially due out this past week, has been further postponed until the 29 March – on or before – ostensibly to incorporate the FY18 financials.

• Netcomm Wireless (NTC AU) has received $1.10 cash offer (53% premium to last close) from Casa Systems (CASA US) via a Scheme.  The deal values Netcomm at ~US$114m. The scheme is subject to FIRB and shareholder approval. Stewart David Paul James, a NED,  holds 12.3% and is the major shareholder. The announcement states that each Netcomm director intends to vote the Netcomm shares held by them in favour of the scheme – subject to a +ve IFA opinion and in the absence of a competing offer. This includes Stewart’s stake.

• MYOB Group Ltd (MYO AU) announced no superior proposal emerged after concluding its ’go shop’ period for rival offers to KKR’s takeover proposal.  At a gross/annualised spread of 0.9%/4.8%, assuming early May payment, this looks to be trading a bit tight.

My ongoing series flags large moves (~10%) in CCASS holdings over the past week or so, moves which are often outside normal market transactions.  These may be indicative of share pledges.  Or potential takeovers. Or simply help understand volume swings. 

Often these moves can easily be explained – the placement of new shares, rights issue, movements subsequent to a takeover, amongst others. For those mentioned below, I could not find an obvious reason for the CCASS move.   

In this briefing:

1. Vedanta Resources PLC: Holding Firm Despite Rising Net Debt
2. Last Week in Event SPACE: Rakuten/Lyft, Delta, Kosaido, Ophir, Dairy Crest, Panalpina, BGF
3. Petrus Doubles Down On Ophir Energy

1. Vedanta Resources PLC: Holding Firm Despite Rising Net Debt

Vedanta Resources (VED LN) (Vedanta)’s net debt of USD6.4bn for six months ended 30 September 2018 results in a net debt/EBITDA ratio of 3.2x compared to 2.4x a year earlier. We are worried about the company’s rising debt amidst new court orders in India barring it from reopening its subsidiary’s controversial copper plant in the southern state of Tamil Nadu. Vedanta’s subsidiary Vedanta Ltd (VEDL IN) (VL) has also witnessed a sharp decline in its stock price over the past three months due to uncertainty over the plant. Vedanta’s 1HFY19 revenues of USD7.1bn saw a 4% increase compared to the same period last year as a result of higher aluminium sales as well as rising commodity prices. Vedanta’s EBITDA for 1HFY19 stood at USD1.7bn, a 1% increase compared to the same period the year before, driven by the higher oil prices as well as better operating efficiencies. Average production metrics increased across the board, including higher production of oil, aluminium, and steel.

We reiterate our OVERWEIGHT recommendation for the VEDLN complex (21s, 23s and 24s) on its attractive yields versus Indian quasi-sovereign peers and the company’s consistent operating performance.

2. Last Week in Event SPACE: Rakuten/Lyft, Delta, Kosaido, Ophir, Dairy Crest, Panalpina, BGF

Last Week in Event SPACE …

• The question mark over the size of Rakuten Inc (4755 JP)‘s stake in Lyft may be known in the coming two weeks.
• Delta Electronics Thai (DELTA TB)‘s Tender Off document fails to clarify how the FY18 dividend will be treated.
• An activist has come forward, and the external statutory auditor and lead shareholder (wife of founder) are against the offer, but Kosaido Co Ltd (7868 JP) situation still fits pretty cleanly in the “Too Hard” bucket for now.
• Ophir Energy (OPHR LN)‘s shareholders ratchet up their opposition to Medco Energi Internasional T (MEDC IJ)‘s Offer.
• A bump seems envisaged against an already healthy price, but it may not need be a big one to get the Dairy Crest (DCG LN) deal done.
  
• DSV A/S (DSV DC)‘s Offer either comes down to price, or it comes down to loyalty to Panalpina Welttransport Holding (PWTN SW)‘s management.
• The BGF Co Ltd (027410 KS) set up trade has provided a decent return recently, but could still run further.
• Plus CCASS movements and expected upcoming events for key M&A transactions.

(This insight covers specific insights & comments involving Stubs, Pairs, Arbitrage, share Classification and Events – or SPACE – in the past week)

Rakuten Inc (4755 JP) (Mkt Cap: $10.2bn; Liquidity: $51mn)

Since announcing its foray into the deeper waters of being the fourth Type I Mobile Network Operator in Japan, Rakuten’s shares have taken a mighty hit. But the focus in this insight is on ride-sharing company Lyft. In March 2015, Rakuten CEO Hiroshi Mikitani announced that Rakuten had invested US$300mn in Lyft, giving it a 11.9% stake after Series E round in May 2015. Recent articles suggest that Rakuten remains the top investor.

• As best as Travis Lundy can tell, from sources who track this, Rakuten is the single largest shareholder in Lyft, with a holding in the 10.4-12.0% range. That would suggest a position value of US$900mn-$1.2bn based on the last funding round in June 2018. At a $25bn pre-money IPO valuation, that would be worth US$1.5-2.0bn for a likely pre-tax IPO uplift of US$590-800mn. 
• A report late Thursday Asia time suggested the Lyft roadshow would start the week of March 18th, which would mean the S-1 will be available two weeks before that. Investors will know more about Rakuten’s ownership of Lyft by the end of next week or very early the following week. Travis would want to be long for now.

(link to Travis’ insight: Will Rakuten Get A Near-Term Lyft?) 

Doosan Heavy Industries (034020 KS) (Mkt Cap: $868mn; Liquidity: $78.5mn)
Doosan Engineering & Construction (011160 KS) (Mkt Cap: $91mn; Liquidity: $0.4mn)

DHICO announced a larger-than-expected ₩608.4bn rights offer. ₩543bn is expected to be raised through common shares at a preliminary price of ₩6,390; and ₩65bn via RCPS at a preliminary price of ₩6,970. This is a combined 72.56% capital increase a 42.05% share dilution. Concurrently, Doosan E&C announced a ₩420bn rights offer at a preliminary price of ₩1,255, a 15% discount to last close.

• For DHICO, Mar 27 is the ex-rights day for both Common and RCPS. Subscription rights (for the Common) will be listed and trade on Apr 19~25. May 2 is final pricing. May 8 is subscription and May 16 is payment. New Common shares will be listed on May 29.
• For E&C, the final price will be fixed on Apr 30. Whichever is higher – ₩1,255 or Apr 26~30 VWAP at a 40% discount – will be the final offering price. Mar 27 will be the ex-rights day. Subscription rights will be listed and traded on Apr 18~24. New shares will be listed on May 24.
• ₩1,255 is a lot more aggressive than generally viewed. DHICO owns nearly two thirds of E&C. With a 20% oversubscription, nearly ₩300bn will likely come from DHICO, essentially buttressing E&C at an even heftier price. Which is probably why the market is being less harsh on E&C relative to DHICO.

link to Sanghyun Park‘s insights:
Doosan E&C Rights Offer: Conditions & Timetable
DHICO (Doosan Heavy) Rights Offer: Conditions & Timetable.

Delta Electronics Thai (DELTA TB) (Mkt Cap: $2.8bn; Liquidity: $3mn)

The 247-4 Form is out with a tender offer period between 26 Feb-1 April, and payment on the 4th April. The frustrating part is how Delta’s FY18 dividend of Bt2.30 is treated. On one hand, it says the Bt71 Offer price is final unless there is a MAC. Further into the Offer doc, it mentions the Offeror “reserves the right” to reduce the offer price if a dividend is paid. DELTA’s IR believes the dividend will be added, but it is not crystal clear.

• Furthermore, there is no minimum acceptance condition, as potentially flagged earlier, which means there is no possibility of fast-tracking payment. Some precedent voluntary offers included a minimum acceptance, which provides an expedited payment should investors who tender shares AND revoke their right to withdraw – provided that minimum is fulfilled.
• Shares traded up after the document came out, shrugging off the ambiguity in the document. Currently trading at a gross/annualised return of 1.1%/11%. The dividend is subject to a 10% tax for non-residents.

(link to my insight: Delta Thailand’s Tender Offer: Updated Timetable)

M1 Ltd (M1 SP) (Mkt Cap: $1.4bn; Liquidity: $3mn)

The previous Friday, the Offerors for M1 announced that their Offer had been declared Unconditional In All Respects as the tendered amount was 57.04% and the total held by concert parties was 76.35%. Axiata Group (AXIATA MK) made an announcement to the Bursa Malaysia that it had accepted the Offer as required because it was a significant asset disposal. Going unconditional has triggered an extension of the Closing Date to 4 March 2019.

• If you want to fight this with an appraisal, you can. Travis doesn’t see the point. If you want to hold on to the stock in order to block full squeezeout and play chicken with the big boys, you can, but it requires a relatively big ticket (roughly 6.73% of the shares out). 
• So Travis recommends taking the money. It was better to take the money in early January and re-deploy, rather than wait for the close of the offer. He would accept now and sees no upside from waiting.

(link to Travis’ insight: M1 Offer Unconditional as Axiata Tenders)

Kosaido Co Ltd (7868 JP) (Mkt Cap: $160mn; Liquidity: $1mn)

When the Tender Offer / MBO for Kosaido was announced last month, Travis’ first reaction was that this was wrong, concluding this was a virtual asset strip in progress, and suggested that the only way this was likely to not get done is if some brave activist came forward.

• Shortly afterwards, an activist did come forward. Yoshiaki Murakami’s bought 5% through his entity Reno KK, and later lifted his stake (combined with affiliates) to 9.55%. Travis thought the stock had run too far at that point (¥775/share). While still cheap, he did not expect Bain to lift its price by 30+%, nor a white knight to arrive quickly enough. 
• This week a media article suggested longstanding external statutory auditor Mr. Nakatsuji and lead shareholder Sakurai Mie were against the takeover.
• The possibility this deal fails because the “put protection” of the deal price at ¥610 is no longer solid has gone up. Conversely, the probability that Bain and the MBO have to come in with a price adjustment higher has gone up. Travis is inclined to remain bearish in the medium-term as there is a significant likelihood there is no alternative solution during the Tender Offer period itself. 

(link to Travis’ insight: Kosaido TOB (7868 JP) Situation Gets Weird – Activists and Independent Opposition to an MBO)

Briefly …

• After announcing earlier this month a number of indicative non-binding bids were received for a “whole of company transaction”, the AFR is now reporting (paywalled) that Lone Star has also joined the battle for Aveo Group (AOG AU). (A Case for Privatising Aveo)
• Xingfa Aluminium (98 HK) announced both China Lesso Group Holdings (2128 HK) (26.3% shareholder) and Sure Keen (11.5%, ED Liao Yuqing’s vehicle), collectively holding  37.81% of shares out, will NOT tender their shares into the offer. (Guangxin Reloads A Peculiar Low-Ball Offer For Xingfa Aluminium)

Dairy Crest (DCG LN) (Mkt Cap: $1.3bn; Liquidity: $4.5mn)

Saputo Inc (SAP CN) and Dairy Crest announced an all-cash deal where Saputo will buy Dairy Crest for 620p/share, to be implemented through a Scheme of Arrangement with an expected close in Q2 2019. This appears to tick all the necessary boxes. Friendly, horizontal integration, and limited job losses. Shares are trading through terms early (he published at 628.5p), perhaps on expectations the wide open register means shareholders can try to hold out for a higher price.

• At almost 14x EV/EBITDA on a TTM basis and a bit lower on a March 2019 FY-end basis, it is a high enough multiple to not be insulting for a dairy company, and may keep other suitors away.
• Dairy Crest’s directors have given irrevocable notice to accept, and the directors’ advisors (Greenhill & Co) have deemed the Offer “fair and reasonable.”
• One extra turn of EV/EBITDA would lift the takeover price just under 10%. That would clear out most of the naysayers who bought in the frothier “we’re going to be an asset-light branded goods company” days of 2015-2017.  Doable, but as it is an agreed deal, Travis doesn’t see the need to push it. 

(link to Travis’ insight: Saputo to Buy Crest Dairy; Initial Market Response Wants a Bump)

Ophir Energy (OPHR LN) (Mkt Cap: $509mn; Liquidity: $6mn)

Petrus Advisors (3.5% shareholder) has dialed up the pressure on its opposition to Medco Energi Internasional T (MEDC IJ)‘s £0.55/share offer for Ophir Energy (OPHR LN), specifically calling into question Bill Schrader’s (Ophir’s Chairman) business acumen.

• In its prior letter to Ophir on the 14 January, Petrus recommended selling the South-East Asian (SEA) assets to Medco, with a low-end fair value, before synergies, of £0.64/share, through to £1.42/share on a blue sky basis. It also argued that Ophir should negotiate with the Equatorial Guinea ministry (the regulator that terminated the Fortuna license, resulting in write-offs of US$610mn) to be compensated for its $700mn investment and the unfair seizure of the license, otherwise it would set a precedent for other international operators doing business in EG.
• Petrus has now rounded on Schrader over perceived mismanagement of the EG licence, and a lack of professionalism in not soliciting and considering offers for Ophir from other buyers. Petrus’ beef is not an outlier –  alternative hedge fund Sand Grove has increased its exposure, via cash-settled derivatives, to 17.28% (as at 13 February); while Ian Hannam, who advised Ophir’s board on its 2013 right issue, is understood to have also written to Ophir’s interim CEO Alan Booth and the board saying Medco’s offer is too low.
• Overall, Petrus’ assertions that Ophir is being sold at “sub optimal terms” appear valid, most notably on the EG compensation and the illogical operations update earlier this month. The alternative push to sell the SEA assets separately, as that has been Medco’s core focus, not international operations, also makes sense.

(link to my insight: Petrus Doubles Down On Ophir Energy)

Panalpina Welttransport Holding (PWTN SW) (Mkt Cap: $3.7bn; Liquidity: $22mn)

Last month, DSV A/S (DSV DC) made a public proposal of a takeover for cash and scrip valued at CHF 170/share, which came at a 24% premium to last and +31% vs 1-month VWAP. The #2, #3, and long-time #4 shareholders are firmly and publicly in the camp of trying to get something done.  45.9%-shareholder Ernst Göhner Foundation is sending mixed signals – do they want a higher price? Or do they want to wait and let Panalpina grow by its own consolidator strategy?

• Panalpina has now confirmed that it in preliminary talks with Kuwait-listed logistics company Agility Public Warehouse. A Bloomberg report suggested a deal could be reached as early as this past week for Agility’s logistics business. The same article suggested the Göhner Foundation is supportive of the new talks. Agility’s press release was much more non-committal.
• DSV has also announced a new all cash CHF 180/share offer for Panalpina; although the original cash and scrip offer was then worth CHF 184.5/share, which is an even better premium to pre-offer terms. One wonders whether cash-only would suit the Foundation; the DSV press release seemed to respond to that.
• It is not clear what would drive the Foundation to give up its control. And Panalpina’s measly share price reaction to the all-cash offer suggest there is considerable skepticism out there. But at some price, Panalpina’s board looks pretty stupid to not accept the cash.
• If you do not think a deal with DSV has any chance of getting up, Panalpina shares are a sell here. If they overpay for Agility and cannot improve their own margins well past historical highs in a market trending weaker, then the shares could drop. 

(link to Travis’ insight: The Panalpina Conundrum)

Mahindra & Mahindra (MM IN) 

Curtis Lehnert backs out a discount to NAV of 42%, the widest since at least 2015. His proposal to structure the trade is to use a market-cap weighted hedge on the two largest listed subsidiaries, Tech Mahindra (TECHM IN) and Mahindra & Mahindra Fin Services Ltd. (MMFS IN) along with a core business hedge using Maruti Suzuki India (MSIL IN) to hedge the core automotive business. 

• Using Curtis’ figures, the implied stub is at its lowest level since a brief downward spike in February 2015, and you would have to go back to April 2014 to find a lower level.
• The push back on this setup is that the auto operations have recorded marginally, yet sequential profit declines in FY16 and FY17; while recording three sequential quarterly declines up to December 2018. The big question is whether Mahindra can regain market share as it kick-starts a new model cycle.

(link to Curtis’ insight: TRADE IDEA – Mahindra & Mahindra (MM IN) Stub: Rise)

BGF Co Ltd (027410 KS) / Bgf Retail (282330 KS)

On January 8th, Douglas Kim initiated a setup trade of going long BGF Co and going short BGF Retail. (Korean Stubs Spotlight: A Pair Trade Between BGF Co. & BGF Retail) This setup has worked out well (7.5% return) and he now think this is a good time to close the trade.

• In contrast, Sanghyun believes the Holdco is still undervalued relative to the Sub by about 10%. Plugging in Sanghyun’s numbers, I back out a discount to NAV of 45% against a one-year average of 30%, with a 12-month range of -51.5% to 15.5% (premium).

links to:
Douglas’ insight: Korean Stubs Spotlight: Close the Pair Trade Between BGF Co. & BGF Retail
Sanghyun’s insight: BGF Duo Stub Trade: Short Sub / Long Holdco with a Very Short-Term Horizon

Can One Bhd (CAN MK) / Kian Joo Can Factory (KJC MK)

Back on the 13 December 2018, Can One announced a proposed MGO for Kian Joo at RM3.10/share, a 52.7% premium to last close. This required Can One shareholders’ approval which was received on the 14 February. Can One’s current 33% stake in Kian Joo accounts for ~86% of its market cap. The offer doc should be out, on or before the 7 March, with payment either late March (along with the first close of the Offer), or early April, depending on when the offer turns unconditional. The offer is conditional on 50% acceptance. Both sides are illiquid.

• This looks like a decent exit for Kian Joo shareholders. Apart from EPF with 10.1%, former NED Teow China See is the only other shareholder with >5% with 8.9%.
• For Can One, this is an aggressive pitch to make Kian Joo a subsidiary amidst an uncertain economic backdrop, while potential synergies may be offset via higher interest costs.

(link to my insight: StubWorld: Can One’s Offer For Kian Joo Can; Mahindra At Possible Set-Up Levels)

Briefly …

• Sanghyun recommended long Hansae Yes24 Holdings Co, Ltd. (016450 KS), short Hansae Co Ltd (105630 KS), now that the Holdco/Sub ratio  is at -227% of σ or a 120D low. Using his numbers, I see the discount to NAV at 49% against a one-year average of 44%; while the implied stub is at a one-year low. (link to Sanghyun’s insight: Hansae Holdco/Sub Trade: Huge Divergence Now, Sub Price Rally Should Be Resisted Here)

Hyundai Glovis (086280 KS) / Hyundai Mobis (012330 KS)

There are still two schools of thought on the HMG restructuring. One is that Glovis/Mobis are merged into a holdco entity. Or Glovis becomes the holdco with Mobis→ HM→ Kia Motors Corp (000270 KS) below. Since late 3Q18, there has been increased speculation on the latter. This has pushed up Glovis’ price relative to Mobis.

• Each outcome is beset with its own set of issues. For Glovis to be the sole holdco, it has to come up with nearly ₩2tn to buy Kia’s Mobis stake, probably through new, and burdensome, debt.  Glovis may also face the risk of forced holdco conversion, creating an issue with Kia as a “great grandson” subsidiary.
• This speculation pushing up Glovis relative to Mobis has yet to be substantiated/justified, suggesting Glovis is overbought. Sanghyun expects a mean reversion, and recommends a long Mobis and short Glovis.

(link to Sanghyun’s insight: Glovis/Mobis Pair Trade: Glovis Being Overpriced Relative to Mobis on Unsubstantiated Speculation)

• Navitas Ltd (NVT AU) has agreed to extend the exclusivity period granted to the BGH consortium to 1 March (from 18 Feb), in order to allow additional time for BGH to complete a limited set of remaining due diligence investigations.

• Hopewell Holdings (54 HK) and the Offeror are still in the course of finalising the information to be included in the Scheme Document. No date for the dispatch has been announced.

• ESR’s offer for Propertylink Group (PLG AU) has turned unconditional after Centuria Capital (CNI AU) tendered. 

• The composite doc for Harbin Electric Co Ltd H (1133 HK), initially due out this past week, has been further postponed until the 29 March – on or before – ostensibly to incorporate the FY18 financials.

• Netcomm Wireless (NTC AU) has received $1.10 cash offer (53% premium to last close) from Casa Systems (CASA US) via a Scheme.  The deal values Netcomm at ~US$114m. The scheme is subject to FIRB and shareholder approval. Stewart David Paul James, a NED,  holds 12.3% and is the major shareholder. The announcement states that each Netcomm director intends to vote the Netcomm shares held by them in favour of the scheme – subject to a +ve IFA opinion and in the absence of a competing offer. This includes Stewart’s stake.

• MYOB Group Ltd (MYO AU) announced no superior proposal emerged after concluding its ’go shop’ period for rival offers to KKR’s takeover proposal.  At a gross/annualised spread of 0.9%/4.8%, assuming early May payment, this looks to be trading a bit tight.

My ongoing series flags large moves (~10%) in CCASS holdings over the past week or so, moves which are often outside normal market transactions.  These may be indicative of share pledges.  Or potential takeovers. Or simply help understand volume swings. 

Often these moves can easily be explained – the placement of new shares, rights issue, movements subsequent to a takeover, amongst others. For those mentioned below, I could not find an obvious reason for the CCASS move.   

3. Petrus Doubles Down On Ophir Energy

Petrus Advisors (3.5% shareholder) has dialled up the pressure on its opposition to Medco Energi Internasional T (MEDC IJ)‘s £0.55/share offer for Ophir Energy (OPHR LN), specifically calling into question Bill Schrader (Ophir’s Chairman) “unprofessionalism”.

Petrus (again) highlighted the premature termination of the Fortuna licence. Ophir announced a $300mn non-cash impairment in early January following the denial of the license extension for the Fortuna project in Equatorial Guinea (EG), having previously written down $310mn back in September. Ophir had invested ~US$700mn in the licence. Petrus accused Schrader of dropping the ball after the departure of CEO Nick Cooper in April 2018, who held key businesses relationships in EQ.

In its prior letter to Ophir on the 14 January, Petrus recommended selling the South-East Asian (SEA) assets to Medco, with a low-end fair value, before synergies, of £0.64/share, through to £1.42/share on a blue sky basis.

Furthermore, Petrus reckons no marketing effort has been for the Mexican license and the 20% ownership in Blocks 1 & 2 in Tanzania, which together have low-end value of $60mn (£0.065/share).  Petrus added that Schrader had not actively solicited and considered alternative offers from other buyers; together with stonewalling demands for Ophir to return capital to shareholders.

Petrus signed off its latest salvo with a cordial “This is your final reminder to preserve and build value. We reserve all our legal rights in this situation“.

Further stirring the pot is alternative hedge fund Sand Grove, who has increased its exposure, via cash-settled derivatives, to 17.28% (as at13 February), up from 6.79% on the 1st February. I have heard, but yet to confirm, there are other shareholders seeking to disrupt this Offer.  Ian Hannam, who advised Ophir’s board on its 2013 right issue, is understood to have also written to Ophir’s interim CEO Alan Booth and the board saying Medco’s offer is too low.

Trading marginally through terms. Medco’s Offer is conditional on 75%+ approval from Ophir’s shareholders, which appears tenuous.

Medco has the option to switch into a Takeover Offer, which in theory could be conditional on a 50% acceptance level, if Medco was in any way inclined to maintain Ophir’s listing. And a switch to a Tender Offer with a reduced shareholder condition, may further flesh out an alternative bidder to come over the top.

Ophir appears a worthwhile punt up at or just below terms. The next key event is the expected issuance of the Scheme booklet on the 28 February.

In this briefing:

1. Medco’s Bump For Ophir Won’t Sway Petrus
2. Weekly Oil Views: Crude Rallies to Four-Month High but Lacks Staying Power
3. Vodafone Idea Needs a 55% Price Increase to Return to Viability
4. Yokogawa Electric (6841 JP): A Less Risky Investment in LNG Engineering
5. Chiyoda: Minor Updates About the Major Capital Infusion, Cost Overruns and Upcoming Orders

1. Medco’s Bump For Ophir Won’t Sway Petrus

The boards of Medco Energi Internasional T (MEDC IJ) and Ophir Energy (OPHR LN) have agreed to increase the Offer price to £0.575 from £0.55, representing a 73.2% premium to the undisturbed price.

All other details of the scheme remain unchanged. The court meeting is to take place on the 25 March, while the long stop is the 20 June – unless both companies agree to an extension.

On Petrus

Petrus has yet to respond to the Offer increase; however, it would be surprising if its stance against the takeover has altered. 

In its prior letter to Ophir on the 14 January, Petrus recommended selling the South-East Asian (SEA) assets to Medco – excluding the Tanzanian and Mexican investments – with a low-end fair value, before synergies, of £0.64/share, through to £1.42/share on a blue sky basis.

Shortly before the increase, Petrus was quoted (paywalled) it would vote its 3.95% against the takeover, while adding “Our satisfaction with the value our board deems as satisfactory has decreased further“, with reference to the release of Ophir’s full-year results on the 12 March.

On Sand Grove/Coro

Subsequent to the bump, Coro Energy PLC (CORO LN), which had previously submitted a non-binding cash/scrip reverse takeover offer on the 8 March, declared it has no intention to bid.

Sand Grove has also announced it has given an irrevocable undertaking to vote its 18.73% in favour of the scheme. Coro held discussions with Sand Grove before abandoning its bid.

Trading Tight – Upside Less Assured

Medco’s Offer is conditional on 75%+ approval from Ophir’s shareholders, which appears less tenuous following the 4.5% bump and Sand Grove’s irrevocable undertaking. While I consider the offer for Ophir sub-optimal – and shares have closed above terms on 30% of the trading days since Medco’s initial offer – Petrus alone cannot disrupt the vote. Of note, the next three largest shareholders behind Sand Grove have reduced their holdings since end-December 2018.

The gross/annualised spread is tight at 0.7%/2.6%, assuming early-July payment. The risk/reward in punting at or just below terms is now less attractive following this Offer Price increase and the irrevocable undertaking.

2. Weekly Oil Views: Crude Rallies to Four-Month High but Lacks Staying Power

Tightening supply fundamentals are starting to take centre-stage in the oil market, and briefly sent crude to a four-month high last week. But just as Brent crossed $68 during intraday trading and market watchers began to wonder if it was going to breach $70, the benchmark slipped down a few notches.

 Crude’s jagged ascent has become a feature since the start of this year, making every upward surge feel tentative. The selling pressure that seized the crude market in the fourth quarter of last year is not yet done. Every rally seems to have plenty of skeptics waiting to sell into it.

Aside from OPEC’s output curbs, which surpassed 100% compliance in February, production from at least two producers not bound by quotas is under threat. Crude output in Venezuela, crippled by a major power outage for more than a week now, has plummeted, while the US says it wants to force Iranian crude exports to below 1 million b/d when the current batch of sanctions waivers expire at the start of May.

 A US-China trade deal looks certain, even though the signing may be pushed back to April…or maybe June. However, economic worries elsewhere continue to weigh on oil market sentiment and demand growth expectations.

OPEC appears determined to stay the course with its production cuts in conjunction with its non-OPEC allies. But it sees non-OPEC supply growth this year dwarfing demand growth by nearly 1.1 million b/d, and is feeling the burden of rebalancing the market once again on its shoulders.

This week, we also discuss: 

• What jumped out at us in the IEA’s annual report
• US EIA lowering its production forecasts
• WTI Houston’s emergence as US crude benchmark

We note the controversial decision by Norway’s sovereign wealth fund to unwind its holdings in the upstream oil and gas sector, a topic we will be tackling in the next edition of Weekly Oil Views. 

3. Vodafone Idea Needs a 55% Price Increase to Return to Viability

Underlying profitability continues to deteriorate at Vodafone Idea (IDEA IN) (IDEA). Chris Hoare has updated his liquidity analysis, and estimates that IDEA needs prices to rise by over 50% to hit cash flow break-even in the medium term. That needs market behavior to change from Jio in particular. Bulls will point to IDEA’s current capital raising and the large capital raising planned at Bharti Airtel (BHARTI IN) as signalling a possible end to hostilities. However, the math at IDEA is such that even a $3.5bn injection gives only temporary relief. What they really need are price increases. Without them (and even with the capital increase), Chris thinks IDEA runs out of cash in about 2 years. We retain our Reduce recommendation and cut our price target to INR16.

4. Yokogawa Electric (6841 JP): A Less Risky Investment in LNG Engineering

Yokogawa Electric is one of the world’s leading suppliers of distributed control systems (DCS) used in the LNG, oil & gas, petrochemical and other industries. It is particularly strong in LNG, having provided control systems for dozens of liquefaction trains, LNG carriers and re-gasification plants.

Unlike Chiyoda Corporation (6366 JP) and JGC (1963 JP), which depend on a small number of large engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) orders, which can be as large as ¥500 billion, Yokogawa only rarely receives an order as large as ¥10 billion and most of its orders are less than ¥1 billion. It is geared primarily to ongoing investments and operating expenditures in its user industries, less exposed to highly variable orders for large LNG and other engineering projects, and relatively immune to cost overruns and other problems at projects gone wrong.

Margins have expanded over the past several years due to a combination of restructuring and technological advance. Unprofitable non-core businesses have been abandoned or sold, high-wage domestic employees retired, and administration, manufacturing and logistics rationalized. Enterprise and robotic process automation (RPA) software have been introduced and an Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) cloud computing platform is under development.  Top-line growth has been slow, but the operating margin has risen from from 5.0% in FY Mar-12 to 8.0% in FY Mar-18, and should reach 10% in FY Mar-21, in our estimation.

At ¥2,215 (Wednesday, March 13 closing price), the shares are selling at 23x our EPS estimate for FY Mar-19 and 20x our estimate for FY Mar-21. Projected EV/EBITDA multiples for the same two years are 9.8x and 8.2x. These and other projected valuation multiples are above their recent historical averages, but indicate upside potential of 20% or more if the anticipated upturn in new LNG investments materializes. Investors willing to take on more speculative risk should look at Chiyoda and JGC.

5. Chiyoda: Minor Updates About the Major Capital Infusion, Cost Overruns and Upcoming Orders

The key point of interest for investors regarding Chiyoda Corp (6366 JP) continues to be details surrounding its upcoming capital raise. The company has, since early November when it incurred these losses, offered scant details regarding the structure of the capital raise, except to note that the components would include additional loans and equity from industrial partners and most likely, main shareholder Mitsubishi Corp (8058 JP).

We visited the company to gather as much information as possible on the potential structure of the capital increase and to update the order outlook and reasons for further cost overruns.

In this briefing:

1. Weekly Oil Views: Crude Rallies to Four-Month High but Lacks Staying Power
2. Vodafone Idea Needs a 55% Price Increase to Return to Viability
3. Yokogawa Electric (6841 JP): A Less Risky Investment in LNG Engineering
4. Chiyoda: Minor Updates About the Major Capital Infusion, Cost Overruns and Upcoming Orders
5. WTI 59.50 Top and Turn Target

1. Weekly Oil Views: Crude Rallies to Four-Month High but Lacks Staying Power

Tightening supply fundamentals are starting to take centre-stage in the oil market, and briefly sent crude to a four-month high last week. But just as Brent crossed $68 during intraday trading and market watchers began to wonder if it was going to breach $70, the benchmark slipped down a few notches.

 Crude’s jagged ascent has become a feature since the start of this year, making every upward surge feel tentative. The selling pressure that seized the crude market in the fourth quarter of last year is not yet done. Every rally seems to have plenty of skeptics waiting to sell into it.

Aside from OPEC’s output curbs, which surpassed 100% compliance in February, production from at least two producers not bound by quotas is under threat. Crude output in Venezuela, crippled by a major power outage for more than a week now, has plummeted, while the US says it wants to force Iranian crude exports to below 1 million b/d when the current batch of sanctions waivers expire at the start of May.

 A US-China trade deal looks certain, even though the signing may be pushed back to April…or maybe June. However, economic worries elsewhere continue to weigh on oil market sentiment and demand growth expectations.

OPEC appears determined to stay the course with its production cuts in conjunction with its non-OPEC allies. But it sees non-OPEC supply growth this year dwarfing demand growth by nearly 1.1 million b/d, and is feeling the burden of rebalancing the market once again on its shoulders.

This week, we also discuss: 

• What jumped out at us in the IEA’s annual report
• US EIA lowering its production forecasts
• WTI Houston’s emergence as US crude benchmark

We note the controversial decision by Norway’s sovereign wealth fund to unwind its holdings in the upstream oil and gas sector, a topic we will be tackling in the next edition of Weekly Oil Views. 

2. Vodafone Idea Needs a 55% Price Increase to Return to Viability

Underlying profitability continues to deteriorate at Vodafone Idea (IDEA IN) (IDEA). Chris Hoare has updated his liquidity analysis, and estimates that IDEA needs prices to rise by over 50% to hit cash flow break-even in the medium term. That needs market behavior to change from Jio in particular. Bulls will point to IDEA’s current capital raising and the large capital raising planned at Bharti Airtel (BHARTI IN) as signalling a possible end to hostilities. However, the math at IDEA is such that even a $3.5bn injection gives only temporary relief. What they really need are price increases. Without them (and even with the capital increase), Chris thinks IDEA runs out of cash in about 2 years. We retain our Reduce recommendation and cut our price target to INR16.

3. Yokogawa Electric (6841 JP): A Less Risky Investment in LNG Engineering

Yokogawa Electric is one of the world’s leading suppliers of distributed control systems (DCS) used in the LNG, oil & gas, petrochemical and other industries. It is particularly strong in LNG, having provided control systems for dozens of liquefaction trains, LNG carriers and re-gasification plants.

Unlike Chiyoda Corporation (6366 JP) and JGC (1963 JP), which depend on a small number of large engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) orders, which can be as large as ¥500 billion, Yokogawa only rarely receives an order as large as ¥10 billion and most of its orders are less than ¥1 billion. It is geared primarily to ongoing investments and operating expenditures in its user industries, less exposed to highly variable orders for large LNG and other engineering projects, and relatively immune to cost overruns and other problems at projects gone wrong.

Margins have expanded over the past several years due to a combination of restructuring and technological advance. Unprofitable non-core businesses have been abandoned or sold, high-wage domestic employees retired, and administration, manufacturing and logistics rationalized. Enterprise and robotic process automation (RPA) software have been introduced and an Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) cloud computing platform is under development.  Top-line growth has been slow, but the operating margin has risen from from 5.0% in FY Mar-12 to 8.0% in FY Mar-18, and should reach 10% in FY Mar-21, in our estimation.

At ¥2,215 (Wednesday, March 13 closing price), the shares are selling at 23x our EPS estimate for FY Mar-19 and 20x our estimate for FY Mar-21. Projected EV/EBITDA multiples for the same two years are 9.8x and 8.2x. These and other projected valuation multiples are above their recent historical averages, but indicate upside potential of 20% or more if the anticipated upturn in new LNG investments materializes. Investors willing to take on more speculative risk should look at Chiyoda and JGC.

4. Chiyoda: Minor Updates About the Major Capital Infusion, Cost Overruns and Upcoming Orders

The key point of interest for investors regarding Chiyoda Corp (6366 JP) continues to be details surrounding its upcoming capital raise. The company has, since early November when it incurred these losses, offered scant details regarding the structure of the capital raise, except to note that the components would include additional loans and equity from industrial partners and most likely, main shareholder Mitsubishi Corp (8058 JP).

We visited the company to gather as much information as possible on the potential structure of the capital increase and to update the order outlook and reasons for further cost overruns.

5. WTI 59.50 Top and Turn Target

WTI’s bullish counter trend rally cycle from the touted low at 45 is maturing and we are hunting for a fresh high to turn from long to short WTI. A peak in oil would align with a softer economic cycle in the next quarter.

Price triangulation is touted as a tactical bullish breakout pattern that will induce a fresh high near targeted dual projection/retracement. This rise is viewed as a more exhaustive rally that will begin to run out of steam with risk of a fade near 58-59. This is a tradable upside move.

RSI dual tops have show high confidence in market peaks from early 2018 and a final push higher out of the triangle bull flag would get us back to the 70 top resistance to nail down a double top. It is this dual top and MACD resistance that worn of an intermediate peak for oil into strength.

Energy shares are underperform oil and a frequent cycle leader to an oil peak.

In this briefing:

1. Vodafone Idea Needs a 55% Price Increase to Return to Viability
2. Yokogawa Electric (6841 JP): A Less Risky Investment in LNG Engineering
3. Chiyoda: Minor Updates About the Major Capital Infusion, Cost Overruns and Upcoming Orders
4. WTI 59.50 Top and Turn Target
5. Geo Energy (GERL SP): Recovery in Coal Price from 4Q18 Bottom; Continue to Wait for M&A Action

1. Vodafone Idea Needs a 55% Price Increase to Return to Viability

Underlying profitability continues to deteriorate at Vodafone Idea (IDEA IN) (IDEA). Chris Hoare has updated his liquidity analysis, and estimates that IDEA needs prices to rise by over 50% to hit cash flow break-even in the medium term. That needs market behavior to change from Jio in particular. Bulls will point to IDEA’s current capital raising and the large capital raising planned at Bharti Airtel (BHARTI IN) as signalling a possible end to hostilities. However, the math at IDEA is such that even a $3.5bn injection gives only temporary relief. What they really need are price increases. Without them (and even with the capital increase), Chris thinks IDEA runs out of cash in about 2 years. We retain our Reduce recommendation and cut our price target to INR16.

2. Yokogawa Electric (6841 JP): A Less Risky Investment in LNG Engineering

Yokogawa Electric is one of the world’s leading suppliers of distributed control systems (DCS) used in the LNG, oil & gas, petrochemical and other industries. It is particularly strong in LNG, having provided control systems for dozens of liquefaction trains, LNG carriers and re-gasification plants.

Unlike Chiyoda Corporation (6366 JP) and JGC (1963 JP), which depend on a small number of large engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) orders, which can be as large as ¥500 billion, Yokogawa only rarely receives an order as large as ¥10 billion and most of its orders are less than ¥1 billion. It is geared primarily to ongoing investments and operating expenditures in its user industries, less exposed to highly variable orders for large LNG and other engineering projects, and relatively immune to cost overruns and other problems at projects gone wrong.

Margins have expanded over the past several years due to a combination of restructuring and technological advance. Unprofitable non-core businesses have been abandoned or sold, high-wage domestic employees retired, and administration, manufacturing and logistics rationalized. Enterprise and robotic process automation (RPA) software have been introduced and an Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) cloud computing platform is under development.  Top-line growth has been slow, but the operating margin has risen from from 5.0% in FY Mar-12 to 8.0% in FY Mar-18, and should reach 10% in FY Mar-21, in our estimation.

At ¥2,215 (Wednesday, March 13 closing price), the shares are selling at 23x our EPS estimate for FY Mar-19 and 20x our estimate for FY Mar-21. Projected EV/EBITDA multiples for the same two years are 9.8x and 8.2x. These and other projected valuation multiples are above their recent historical averages, but indicate upside potential of 20% or more if the anticipated upturn in new LNG investments materializes. Investors willing to take on more speculative risk should look at Chiyoda and JGC.

3. Chiyoda: Minor Updates About the Major Capital Infusion, Cost Overruns and Upcoming Orders

The key point of interest for investors regarding Chiyoda Corp (6366 JP) continues to be details surrounding its upcoming capital raise. The company has, since early November when it incurred these losses, offered scant details regarding the structure of the capital raise, except to note that the components would include additional loans and equity from industrial partners and most likely, main shareholder Mitsubishi Corp (8058 JP).

We visited the company to gather as much information as possible on the potential structure of the capital increase and to update the order outlook and reasons for further cost overruns.

4. WTI 59.50 Top and Turn Target

WTI’s bullish counter trend rally cycle from the touted low at 45 is maturing and we are hunting for a fresh high to turn from long to short WTI. A peak in oil would align with a softer economic cycle in the next quarter.

Price triangulation is touted as a tactical bullish breakout pattern that will induce a fresh high near targeted dual projection/retracement. This rise is viewed as a more exhaustive rally that will begin to run out of steam with risk of a fade near 58-59. This is a tradable upside move.

RSI dual tops have show high confidence in market peaks from early 2018 and a final push higher out of the triangle bull flag would get us back to the 70 top resistance to nail down a double top. It is this dual top and MACD resistance that worn of an intermediate peak for oil into strength.

Energy shares are underperform oil and a frequent cycle leader to an oil peak.

5. Geo Energy (GERL SP): Recovery in Coal Price from 4Q18 Bottom; Continue to Wait for M&A Action

Geo Energy Resources (GERL SP) reported weak 4Q18 results late last month. The reason for the 5M USD net loss in 4Q18 was mainly due to Chinese import restrictions for Indonesian coal in November and December last year. With the import quota removed as of January ICI4 coal prices have rebounded from +/-30 USD/ton late 2018 to 40 USD/ton this week. 

Geo remains in deep value territory (3x EV/EBITDA) as the company still has over 200M USD+ in cash it raised from a 300M USD bond placing almost 18 months ago. While the CEO announced plans to organize a HK dual listing in 1H19 this cannot materialize unless management can execute on a significant acquisition opportunity it has been considering for the last twelve months. With Indonesian elections coming up next month the hope is that clarity on this potential transaction can be sorted by late 1H19.

While Europe is obsessed with Climate Change doomsday scenarios being shouted around by school-skipping teenagers, the reality is that three out of four of the most populated countries in the world (China, India and Indonesia) will remain heavy users of coal for decades to come. With cleaner coal technology being the key differentiator how much pollution is emitted.

My Fair Value estimate (Base case) remains 0.35 SGD or 89% upside.  Please recall, Macquarie paid 0.29 SGD for a 5% stake in November 2018 and had warrants issued to it at 0.33 SGD.

In this briefing:

1. Yokogawa Electric (6841 JP): A Less Risky Investment in LNG Engineering
2. Chiyoda: Minor Updates About the Major Capital Infusion, Cost Overruns and Upcoming Orders
3. WTI 59.50 Top and Turn Target
4. Geo Energy (GERL SP): Recovery in Coal Price from 4Q18 Bottom; Continue to Wait for M&A Action
5. New J. Hutton Exploration Report (Weeks Ending 08/03/19)

1. Yokogawa Electric (6841 JP): A Less Risky Investment in LNG Engineering

Yokogawa Electric is one of the world’s leading suppliers of distributed control systems (DCS) used in the LNG, oil & gas, petrochemical and other industries. It is particularly strong in LNG, having provided control systems for dozens of liquefaction trains, LNG carriers and re-gasification plants.

Unlike Chiyoda Corporation (6366 JP) and JGC (1963 JP), which depend on a small number of large engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) orders, which can be as large as ¥500 billion, Yokogawa only rarely receives an order as large as ¥10 billion and most of its orders are less than ¥1 billion. It is geared primarily to ongoing investments and operating expenditures in its user industries, less exposed to highly variable orders for large LNG and other engineering projects, and relatively immune to cost overruns and other problems at projects gone wrong.

Margins have expanded over the past several years due to a combination of restructuring and technological advance. Unprofitable non-core businesses have been abandoned or sold, high-wage domestic employees retired, and administration, manufacturing and logistics rationalized. Enterprise and robotic process automation (RPA) software have been introduced and an Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) cloud computing platform is under development.  Top-line growth has been slow, but the operating margin has risen from from 5.0% in FY Mar-12 to 8.0% in FY Mar-18, and should reach 10% in FY Mar-21, in our estimation.

At ¥2,215 (Wednesday, March 13 closing price), the shares are selling at 23x our EPS estimate for FY Mar-19 and 20x our estimate for FY Mar-21. Projected EV/EBITDA multiples for the same two years are 9.8x and 8.2x. These and other projected valuation multiples are above their recent historical averages, but indicate upside potential of 20% or more if the anticipated upturn in new LNG investments materializes. Investors willing to take on more speculative risk should look at Chiyoda and JGC.

2. Chiyoda: Minor Updates About the Major Capital Infusion, Cost Overruns and Upcoming Orders

The key point of interest for investors regarding Chiyoda Corp (6366 JP) continues to be details surrounding its upcoming capital raise. The company has, since early November when it incurred these losses, offered scant details regarding the structure of the capital raise, except to note that the components would include additional loans and equity from industrial partners and most likely, main shareholder Mitsubishi Corp (8058 JP).

We visited the company to gather as much information as possible on the potential structure of the capital increase and to update the order outlook and reasons for further cost overruns.

3. WTI 59.50 Top and Turn Target

WTI’s bullish counter trend rally cycle from the touted low at 45 is maturing and we are hunting for a fresh high to turn from long to short WTI. A peak in oil would align with a softer economic cycle in the next quarter.

Price triangulation is touted as a tactical bullish breakout pattern that will induce a fresh high near targeted dual projection/retracement. This rise is viewed as a more exhaustive rally that will begin to run out of steam with risk of a fade near 58-59. This is a tradable upside move.

RSI dual tops have show high confidence in market peaks from early 2018 and a final push higher out of the triangle bull flag would get us back to the 70 top resistance to nail down a double top. It is this dual top and MACD resistance that worn of an intermediate peak for oil into strength.

Energy shares are underperform oil and a frequent cycle leader to an oil peak.

4. Geo Energy (GERL SP): Recovery in Coal Price from 4Q18 Bottom; Continue to Wait for M&A Action

Geo Energy Resources (GERL SP) reported weak 4Q18 results late last month. The reason for the 5M USD net loss in 4Q18 was mainly due to Chinese import restrictions for Indonesian coal in November and December last year. With the import quota removed as of January ICI4 coal prices have rebounded from +/-30 USD/ton late 2018 to 40 USD/ton this week. 

Geo remains in deep value territory (3x EV/EBITDA) as the company still has over 200M USD+ in cash it raised from a 300M USD bond placing almost 18 months ago. While the CEO announced plans to organize a HK dual listing in 1H19 this cannot materialize unless management can execute on a significant acquisition opportunity it has been considering for the last twelve months. With Indonesian elections coming up next month the hope is that clarity on this potential transaction can be sorted by late 1H19.

While Europe is obsessed with Climate Change doomsday scenarios being shouted around by school-skipping teenagers, the reality is that three out of four of the most populated countries in the world (China, India and Indonesia) will remain heavy users of coal for decades to come. With cleaner coal technology being the key differentiator how much pollution is emitted.

My Fair Value estimate (Base case) remains 0.35 SGD or 89% upside.  Please recall, Macquarie paid 0.29 SGD for a 5% stake in November 2018 and had warrants issued to it at 0.33 SGD.

5. New J. Hutton Exploration Report (Weeks Ending 08/03/19)

• Coverage now expanded to 730 mining companies
• Retain Peel Mining Ltd (PEX AU) as a Speculative Buy
• Current drilling infill only
• Est. A$4-4.5m cash with capital raising soon
• Very solid geological genetic model honing future extensional exploration efforts 
• Expect maiden Resource computation to commence after next three hole assays released
• Aeon Metals Ltd (AML AU), Blackearth Minerals NL (BEM AU), Boss Resources (BOE AU), Centaurus Metals (CTM AU), Catalyst Metals (CYL AU), Amur Minerals (AMC LN), Patagonia Gold (PGD LN), Tyranna Resources (TYX AU), Gladiator Resources (GLA AU), King River Resources (KRR AU), Vango Mining (VAN AU), Hummingbird Resources (HUM LN), Caravel Minerals (CVV AU), Lefroy Exploration Ltd (LEX AU), Millennium Minerals (MOY AU), Northern Minerals (NTU AU), Blackham Resources (BLK AU), Avz Minerals (AVZ AU), Orocobre Ltd (ORE AU), Serabi Gold plc (SRB LN), Paringa Resources (PNL AU), Artemis Resources (ARV AU), Centrex Metals (CXM AU), Great Boulder Resources Ltd (GBR AU), Superior Lake Resources (SUP AU), Cora Gold Ltd (CORA LN), European Metals Holdings Ltd (EMH LN), Savannah Resources PLC (SAV LN) , IronRidge Resources Ltd (IRR LN)

In this briefing:

1. Chiyoda: Minor Updates About the Major Capital Infusion, Cost Overruns and Upcoming Orders
2. WTI 59.50 Top and Turn Target
3. Geo Energy (GERL SP): Recovery in Coal Price from 4Q18 Bottom; Continue to Wait for M&A Action
4. New J. Hutton Exploration Report (Weeks Ending 08/03/19)
5. HK Connect Discovery Weekly: PICC, Xinyi Solar (2019-03-08)

1. Chiyoda: Minor Updates About the Major Capital Infusion, Cost Overruns and Upcoming Orders

The key point of interest for investors regarding Chiyoda Corp (6366 JP) continues to be details surrounding its upcoming capital raise. The company has, since early November when it incurred these losses, offered scant details regarding the structure of the capital raise, except to note that the components would include additional loans and equity from industrial partners and most likely, main shareholder Mitsubishi Corp (8058 JP).

We visited the company to gather as much information as possible on the potential structure of the capital increase and to update the order outlook and reasons for further cost overruns.

2. WTI 59.50 Top and Turn Target

WTI’s bullish counter trend rally cycle from the touted low at 45 is maturing and we are hunting for a fresh high to turn from long to short WTI. A peak in oil would align with a softer economic cycle in the next quarter.

Price triangulation is touted as a tactical bullish breakout pattern that will induce a fresh high near targeted dual projection/retracement. This rise is viewed as a more exhaustive rally that will begin to run out of steam with risk of a fade near 58-59. This is a tradable upside move.

RSI dual tops have show high confidence in market peaks from early 2018 and a final push higher out of the triangle bull flag would get us back to the 70 top resistance to nail down a double top. It is this dual top and MACD resistance that worn of an intermediate peak for oil into strength.

Energy shares are underperform oil and a frequent cycle leader to an oil peak.

3. Geo Energy (GERL SP): Recovery in Coal Price from 4Q18 Bottom; Continue to Wait for M&A Action

Geo Energy Resources (GERL SP) reported weak 4Q18 results late last month. The reason for the 5M USD net loss in 4Q18 was mainly due to Chinese import restrictions for Indonesian coal in November and December last year. With the import quota removed as of January ICI4 coal prices have rebounded from +/-30 USD/ton late 2018 to 40 USD/ton this week. 

Geo remains in deep value territory (3x EV/EBITDA) as the company still has over 200M USD+ in cash it raised from a 300M USD bond placing almost 18 months ago. While the CEO announced plans to organize a HK dual listing in 1H19 this cannot materialize unless management can execute on a significant acquisition opportunity it has been considering for the last twelve months. With Indonesian elections coming up next month the hope is that clarity on this potential transaction can be sorted by late 1H19.

While Europe is obsessed with Climate Change doomsday scenarios being shouted around by school-skipping teenagers, the reality is that three out of four of the most populated countries in the world (China, India and Indonesia) will remain heavy users of coal for decades to come. With cleaner coal technology being the key differentiator how much pollution is emitted.

My Fair Value estimate (Base case) remains 0.35 SGD or 89% upside.  Please recall, Macquarie paid 0.29 SGD for a 5% stake in November 2018 and had warrants issued to it at 0.33 SGD.

4. New J. Hutton Exploration Report (Weeks Ending 08/03/19)

• Coverage now expanded to 730 mining companies
• Retain Peel Mining Ltd (PEX AU) as a Speculative Buy
• Current drilling infill only
• Est. A$4-4.5m cash with capital raising soon
• Very solid geological genetic model honing future extensional exploration efforts 
• Expect maiden Resource computation to commence after next three hole assays released
• Aeon Metals Ltd (AML AU), Blackearth Minerals NL (BEM AU), Boss Resources (BOE AU), Centaurus Metals (CTM AU), Catalyst Metals (CYL AU), Amur Minerals (AMC LN), Patagonia Gold (PGD LN), Tyranna Resources (TYX AU), Gladiator Resources (GLA AU), King River Resources (KRR AU), Vango Mining (VAN AU), Hummingbird Resources (HUM LN), Caravel Minerals (CVV AU), Lefroy Exploration Ltd (LEX AU), Millennium Minerals (MOY AU), Northern Minerals (NTU AU), Blackham Resources (BLK AU), Avz Minerals (AVZ AU), Orocobre Ltd (ORE AU), Serabi Gold plc (SRB LN), Paringa Resources (PNL AU), Artemis Resources (ARV AU), Centrex Metals (CXM AU), Great Boulder Resources Ltd (GBR AU), Superior Lake Resources (SUP AU), Cora Gold Ltd (CORA LN), European Metals Holdings Ltd (EMH LN), Savannah Resources PLC (SAV LN) , IronRidge Resources Ltd (IRR LN)

5. HK Connect Discovery Weekly: PICC, Xinyi Solar (2019-03-08)

In our Discover HK Connect series, we aim to help our investors understand the flow of southbound trades via the Hong Kong Connect, as analyzed by our proprietary data engine. We will discuss the stocks that experienced the most inflow and outflow by mainland investors in the past seven days.

We split the stocks eligible for the Hong Kong Connect trade into three groups: component stocks in the HSCEI index, stocks with a market capitalization between USD 1 billion and USD 5 billion, and stocks with a market capitalization between USD 500 million and USD 1 billion.

In this insight, we will highlight PICC and Xinyi Solar.

In this briefing:

1. WTI 59.50 Top and Turn Target
2. Geo Energy (GERL SP): Recovery in Coal Price from 4Q18 Bottom; Continue to Wait for M&A Action
3. New J. Hutton Exploration Report (Weeks Ending 08/03/19)
4. HK Connect Discovery Weekly: PICC, Xinyi Solar (2019-03-08)
5. Weekly Oil Views: Crude Eyes Tightening Supply but in the Shadow of Gloom

1. WTI 59.50 Top and Turn Target

WTI’s bullish counter trend rally cycle from the touted low at 45 is maturing and we are hunting for a fresh high to turn from long to short WTI. A peak in oil would align with a softer economic cycle in the next quarter.

Price triangulation is touted as a tactical bullish breakout pattern that will induce a fresh high near targeted dual projection/retracement. This rise is viewed as a more exhaustive rally that will begin to run out of steam with risk of a fade near 58-59. This is a tradable upside move.

RSI dual tops have show high confidence in market peaks from early 2018 and a final push higher out of the triangle bull flag would get us back to the 70 top resistance to nail down a double top. It is this dual top and MACD resistance that worn of an intermediate peak for oil into strength.

Energy shares are underperform oil and a frequent cycle leader to an oil peak.

2. Geo Energy (GERL SP): Recovery in Coal Price from 4Q18 Bottom; Continue to Wait for M&A Action

Geo Energy Resources (GERL SP) reported weak 4Q18 results late last month. The reason for the 5M USD net loss in 4Q18 was mainly due to Chinese import restrictions for Indonesian coal in November and December last year. With the import quota removed as of January ICI4 coal prices have rebounded from +/-30 USD/ton late 2018 to 40 USD/ton this week. 

Geo remains in deep value territory (3x EV/EBITDA) as the company still has over 200M USD+ in cash it raised from a 300M USD bond placing almost 18 months ago. While the CEO announced plans to organize a HK dual listing in 1H19 this cannot materialize unless management can execute on a significant acquisition opportunity it has been considering for the last twelve months. With Indonesian elections coming up next month the hope is that clarity on this potential transaction can be sorted by late 1H19.

While Europe is obsessed with Climate Change doomsday scenarios being shouted around by school-skipping teenagers, the reality is that three out of four of the most populated countries in the world (China, India and Indonesia) will remain heavy users of coal for decades to come. With cleaner coal technology being the key differentiator how much pollution is emitted.

My Fair Value estimate (Base case) remains 0.35 SGD or 89% upside.  Please recall, Macquarie paid 0.29 SGD for a 5% stake in November 2018 and had warrants issued to it at 0.33 SGD.

3. New J. Hutton Exploration Report (Weeks Ending 08/03/19)

• Coverage now expanded to 730 mining companies
• Retain Peel Mining Ltd (PEX AU) as a Speculative Buy
• Current drilling infill only
• Est. A$4-4.5m cash with capital raising soon
• Very solid geological genetic model honing future extensional exploration efforts 
• Expect maiden Resource computation to commence after next three hole assays released
• Aeon Metals Ltd (AML AU), Blackearth Minerals NL (BEM AU), Boss Resources (BOE AU), Centaurus Metals (CTM AU), Catalyst Metals (CYL AU), Amur Minerals (AMC LN), Patagonia Gold (PGD LN), Tyranna Resources (TYX AU), Gladiator Resources (GLA AU), King River Resources (KRR AU), Vango Mining (VAN AU), Hummingbird Resources (HUM LN), Caravel Minerals (CVV AU), Lefroy Exploration Ltd (LEX AU), Millennium Minerals (MOY AU), Northern Minerals (NTU AU), Blackham Resources (BLK AU), Avz Minerals (AVZ AU), Orocobre Ltd (ORE AU), Serabi Gold plc (SRB LN), Paringa Resources (PNL AU), Artemis Resources (ARV AU), Centrex Metals (CXM AU), Great Boulder Resources Ltd (GBR AU), Superior Lake Resources (SUP AU), Cora Gold Ltd (CORA LN), European Metals Holdings Ltd (EMH LN), Savannah Resources PLC (SAV LN) , IronRidge Resources Ltd (IRR LN)

4. HK Connect Discovery Weekly: PICC, Xinyi Solar (2019-03-08)

In our Discover HK Connect series, we aim to help our investors understand the flow of southbound trades via the Hong Kong Connect, as analyzed by our proprietary data engine. We will discuss the stocks that experienced the most inflow and outflow by mainland investors in the past seven days.

We split the stocks eligible for the Hong Kong Connect trade into three groups: component stocks in the HSCEI index, stocks with a market capitalization between USD 1 billion and USD 5 billion, and stocks with a market capitalization between USD 500 million and USD 1 billion.

In this insight, we will highlight PICC and Xinyi Solar.

5. Weekly Oil Views: Crude Eyes Tightening Supply but in the Shadow of Gloom

Crude has been gradually reconnecting with its supply-demand fundamentals, and the impact of highly disciplined OPEC cuts just two months into the group’s production restraint deal is becoming evident in relatively stable prices. Through much of last week, crude prices firmed and stood their ground even as global stock markets were skidding.

However, oil is not completely out of the shadows of the global economic sentiment. Crude prices were whiplashed last Friday along with the equity markets as a fresh wave of gloom and doom from the European Central Bank’s downward revision of eurozone growth projections rattled investors. Earlier in the week, China set off fresh alarm bells, by officially revising down its 2019 GDP growth target to 6-6.5%, while Premier Li Keqiang warned that the country’s economy faced a “tough struggle” ahead.

Nonetheless, benchmark Brent and WTI  crude futures resisted the lows plumbed during intraday trading Friday, to close marginally higher on the week. While global oil demand growth forecasts remain tentative, supply fundamentals are clearly firming. Output from 11 of OPEC’s 14 members that agreed to collectively curb output by around 812,000 b/d starting January this year almost reached 100% of the target in February.

The race to the compliance finish line was helped by Saudi Arabia, which is slashing its output way beyond its commitment. Meanwhile, the three OPEC members exempted from the latest round of production cuts — Iran, Libya and Venezuela — are also under-delivering. That amounted to OPEC-14 production plunging by around 1.7 million b/d compared with the high of last October.

OPEC will need to be careful not to over-tighten the market, as happened through the first half of last year. We believe the group will be cautious on that front, given its experience of 2018, when it was forced to make two policy U-turns in the space of six months.