Consumer

In this briefing:

1. M1 Ltd (M1 SP): Axiata Throws in the Towel, Delisting Looms
2. Musashino Bank  (8336 JP): Braking Bad
3. Last Week in Event SPACE: Softbank, Delta, U-Shin, CJ Hello, Glow, Sigma, Oslo Bors, Hang Lung

1. M1 Ltd (M1 SP): Axiata Throws in the Towel, Delisting Looms

After the market close last Friday, M1 Ltd (M1 SP) announced that the voluntary conditional offer (VGO) became unconditional as Keppel Corp Ltd (KEP SP) and Singapore Press Holdings (SPH SP) (KCL-SPH) has an interest in M1 of 76.4%. The offer became unconditional due to Axiata Group (AXIATA MK), the single largest shareholder with a 28.7% shareholding, accepting the offer.

2. Musashino Bank  (8336 JP): Braking Bad

Musashino Bank (8336 JP) was one of the last regional banks to announce 3Q FY3/2019 results, and they were a nasty surprise: a consolidated net loss for the nine months to 31 December 2018, caused by heavy reserving in Q3 (October-December 2018) against the bank’s exposure to the troubled Akebono Brake Industry Co (7238 JP) .  While the bank has slashed its full-year net profit guidance from ¥11.1 billion to ¥4.5 billion, this would still require an heroic level of profits in Q4 which the bank has never before achieved.  The share price has fallen over 31% in the last twelve months.  Valuations at current levels are still high (FY3/2019 PER is 17.6x) and we consider the share price to be vulnerable to further weakness.  Caveat emptor (May the buyer beware) !

3. Last Week in Event SPACE: Softbank, Delta, U-Shin, CJ Hello, Glow, Sigma, Oslo Bors, Hang Lung

Last Week in Event SPACE …

• Softbank Group (9984 JP)‘s discount to NAV could narrow with Softbank looking to buy 10-13% of Real World Float.
• Excessive unknowns heading into Delta Electronics Thai (DELTA TB)‘s tender offer announcement.
• The price and process for the tender Offer for U Shin Ltd (6985 JP) is simply confounding.
• Taekwang Industrial (003240 KS)‘s 53.9% stake in Tbroad in the spotlight after LG Uplus Corp (032640 KS) takes a majority stake in Cj Hellovision (037560 KS).
• Global Power Synergy Company Ltd (GPSC TB)‘s rekindled Offer for Glow Energy Pcl (GLOW TB) should be priced similarly to its prior tilt.
• The fundamental drift and likelihood of a Sigma Healthcare (SIG AU) deal with API remain good.
• Has the contest for Oslo Bors VPS Holding ASA (OSLO NS) reached a Mexican standoff?
• Hang Lung (10 HK)‘s implied stub is at its widest since June 2013, outside a brief downward spike in in late April 2018.
• Plus CCASS movements and expected upcoming events for key M&A transactions.

(This insight covers specific insights & comments involving Stubs, Pairs, Arbitrage, share Classification and Events – or SPACE – in the past week)

Softbank Group (9984 JP) (Mkt Cap: $106bn; Liquidity: $795mn)

Softbank has announced a buyback of ¥600bn – its largest buyback ever. At ~¥10,500/share it is 57mm shares or 5.2% of shares out. At ¥12,000/share it is 50mm shares or 4.6%. The “official” float is about 68.7% or 750mm shares. However, by Travis’ estimate, only 44.5% of shares out or 488mm shares are Real World Float. 57mm shares out of 488mm shares is 11.7%.  That is a non-negligible portion of float, and will mean significant reduction in foreign active management exposure to Softbank, or significant reduction in individual investor exposure to Softbank, or both. 

• Travis Lundy wrote the buyback will have further impact on the stock price simply because of flow dynamics. It isn’t easy to buy 10% of float. And we should remember that the BOJ is still buying ¥100bn+ of Softbank shares per year as it continues to buy ¥6trln of ETFs per year. And given the stock will be in the top momentum ranks of large cap Japan, Travis expects momentum flows will join the party adding more inflow.
• For trading types, he thought Softbank was a buy, relatively and on an absolute basis. The Japan market is CHEAP on a current year and forecast year ahead, which suggests either the market is “wrong” or economic headwinds are picking up to a greater extent than pundits suggest. 

(link to Travis insight: Softbank Buyback More Than It Appears To Be)

Delta Electronics Thai (DELTA TB) (Mkt Cap: $2.8bn; Liquidity: $2mn)

The pre-conditons have been fulfilled and Delta Electronics (2308 TT) will now move to a tender offer. But there exist a number of unknowns for the transaction, which could delay the Offer timetable.

• Although the initial wording in the August conditional voluntary tender offer announcement suggests the offer will be for ALL shares, there is talk there may be a maximum acceptance condition, therefore possible clawback for shareholders tendering. A rumoured 60% maximum translates to a minimum 50% pro-rata, potentially 67% if the family tenders 40% and the rest of holders tender half.

• It is not clear whether the FY18 dividend will be netted. DELTA has announced two sets of quarterly results since the initial Offer announcement and it would be unjust for DEISG to net off any dividend.  It would likely suit the family to receive the dividend. The Offer is pitched at a 1.79% premium to the then-current price. If the dividend is netted, then the Offer price will, in fact, be at a discount to last close as of announcement. DELTA will announce its full-year dividend tomorrow (18th February) and the terms of the deal may also be announced the same day. The AGM to ratify the dividend will take place around the 2 April.
• Currently trading at terms or a gross/annualised spread of 4.6/21%, if including a Bt3.30 FY18 dividend and mid-May payment. That looks overly tight in the face of timing delays and actual consideration to be paid if indeed it comes out to be a partial offer.

(link to my insight: Delta’s Less-Than-Straightforward Tender Offer)

U Shin Ltd (6985 JP) (Mkt Cap: $294mn; Liquidity: $2mn)

Three months ago, Minebea Mitsumi (6479 JP) announced it would launch a Tender Offer for U Shin and it would take just under three months until the approvals were received and it could officially start the Tender Offer process. The background to the Tender Offer was discussed in Minebea Mitsumi Launches Offer for U-SHIN in early November. Travis first conclusion in November was that this was the “riskiest” straight-out non-hostile TOB he had seen in a while.  Minebea Mitsumi has now announced the launch of its Tender Offer, at the same price as originally planned (¥985/share). 

• This deal is still perplexing to Travis. It’s easy enough from an industrial standpoint. Why not buy relatively cheap assets then see if you can cross-sell or assume some attrition? But for investors, he wonders why they put up with this. The process of reaching a “fair” valuation is, by definition, conflicted. It cannot NOT be conflicted. And just because some independent directors who don’t have skin in the game, and may have no clue about corporate valuation methodology, or fair market price, agree to a price that the acquiree’s managers, not wanting to lose their jobs, agree to doesn’t make this “fair.”
• The tender offer period is QUITE long. Most tender offers are 30 days in order to give time for people to tender or “offer sufficient time for a rival bidder.” This time Travis thinks it is longer so people can take their time and get bored and tender.
• Travis would sell shares now and use the balance sheet elsewhere until an activist shows his hand. If no activist, this deal is not an interesting one. 

(link to Travis’ insight: Minebea-Mitsumi Underpriced Tender for U SHIN (6985 JP) Launched)

Cj Hellovision (037560 KS) (Mkt Cap: $720mn; Liquidity: $5mn)

After multiple news outlets reported that LG Uplus Corp (032640 KS) will finalise a transaction with the CJ Hello, a deal was done at ₩800bn (instead of ₩1tn speculated), and only 50%+1 share instead of the full 53.92% stake held by CJ ENM (035760 KS). The acquisition price of ₩20,659 is a 107% premium to last price and translates to a EV/EBITDA multiple of 6.6x. 

• This is a straight stock acquisition deal. CJ Hello will be a subsidiary of LG Uplus and will continue to exist as a separate listed company. CJ ENM still owns nearly 4% CJH stake. SKT owns 8.61%. 
• LG Group is publicly saying that they have no plan of an immediate merger, which means neither party requires shareholder approval. But the transaction is subject to local regulator approval – MSIT and  Korea FTC. MSIT approval is not an issue. FTC rejected the SKT-CJH deal last time. This time, the FTC’s head Kim Sang-jo is hinting that this deal will go through.
• LG Uplus’ acquisition of CJ Hellovision is likely to further accelerate the consolidation of the Korean cable TV/media sector. KT Corp (030200 KS) is now likely to aggressively try to acquire cable-operator D’Live. SK Telecom (017670 KS) has shown some interests in acquiring Tbroad cable company. 
• Douglas Kim reckons Taekwang Industrial (003240 KS) 53.9% stake in Tbroad – also a possible target – may be worth ₩600bn or nearly 35% of its market cap. 

links to:
Sanghyun Park‘s insight: ‘ insight: LG Uplus – CJ Hello Acquisition: Current Status & Trade Approach
Douglas’ insight: Korea M&A Spotlight: LGUplus to Acquire CJ Hellovision: What’s Next for Tbroad and D’Live?
Sanghyun’s follow-up insight: LG Uplus – CJ Hello Acquisition: Current Yield Is 10%, CJH Overhang Concerns Will Push It Up

Glow Energy Pcl (GLOW TB)(Mkt Cap: $4.2bn; Liquidity: $4mn)

Glow announced that the Energy Regulatory Commission (“ERC”) has resolved to approve the merger with GPSC, provided Glow sells its Glow SPP1 plant before or at the same time as the merger. A number of conditions were also attached to some of the remaining power plants. No price has been disclosed for the 69.11% stake in Glow, ex the SPP1 plant, but it will be in reference to the Bt94.892 Offer price previously announced, net of expenses with selling SPP1 and the reduced synergy thereon.

• Given SPP1 is an immaterial contributor (~5%) to Glow, in terms of revenue, it can be argued that GPSC may make only a minimal change to the Offer price.  Still, even a 5% downward adjustment would equate to a price below where Glow is trading.
• The downside is ~8%, if using the closing price on the 11 October. Glow/GPSC/Engie want this deal to complete. I think the final Offer price will come in very close to that initially proposed. But I would not buy through Bt90, preferring to pick up shares at Bt89 or below. The merger is expected to be completed by next month, triggering a mandatory tender offer, which may take an additional 2 months or so to complete.

(link to my insight: GPSC To Proceed With Glow Takeover, But At What Price?)

Sigma Healthcare (SIG AU) (Mkt Cap: $409mn; Liquidity: $2mn)

Sigma Healthcare released a 2-page Market Update saying the four month Business Review had identified A$100mm of annual cost savings, confirmed the FY19 EBIT guidance of A$75mn, and confirmed the FY20 EBITDA guidance of $55-60mm. The business review sees 10% underlying EBITDA growth from FY20 to FY23 so that after cost savings are included, FY23 sees the same EBITDA as FY19 [i.e. almost A$90mm].

• On a standalone basis, at the end of FY22 looking towards FY23, at 8x EV/EBITDA, it looks like there is something like 60-80% upside. EBITDA might be worth even more than A$90mm in FY23 as long as the DCs can run at high capacity. And at mid-high teens PER that would be a pretty great result. They won’t get that 60-80% upside from now doing a deal with API, but they won’t have to wait for 4 years to get it either. 
• Travis expects another A$0.15 of value would do it. He doesn’t think they need A$0.20. The shares bounced and traded around A$0.80-1.00 from mid summer 2017 to mid-summer 2018. But that is when EBIT was supposed to fall to A$90mm. And that was nearer-term. Now we have a forecast of EBITDA of A$90mm and that is 3+ years out. 
• Travis thinks this could get done at 0.42-0.45 shares of API and A$0.23 of cash, given that would probably impact API shares a little bit, that would end up being a 10-15% bump vs original terms, but all told that would be pretty good – and almost a double from undisturbed.

(link to Travis’ insight: Sigma Healthcare Market Update: Strategic Review Expects More)

Kabu.Com Securities (8703 JP) (Mkt Cap: $1.7bn; Liquidity: $8mn)

KDDI Corp (9433 JP) announced its intention to conduct a Tender Offer for Kabu.com through a made-for-purpose SPC. The deal is not terribly different in scope than the one discussed in KDDI Deal for Kabu.com (8703 JP) Coming? about two weeks ago.

• The Tender Offer is to purchase a minimum of 45,758,400 shares at ¥559/share, which is a 5.67% premium to last close and a 46.3% premium to the undisturbed price of 23 January 2019. Obtaining the minimum would get the combination of KDDI and MUFJ Securities (which currently holds 52.96% of the shares outstanding, and will not tender) to 66.67% which would allow the combination to do a Two Step Squeezeout, which KDDI states in the document that it intends to do.
• Anti-trust and regulatory approvals are required (Travis can’t imagine any issues), and KDDI expects that the Tender Offer will commence in late April. This looks pretty easy as a deal, with few impediments. A rival bid is unlikely – KDDI has a headstart with the shares of MUFG Bank which have committed to the deal.
• This is going to be boring. One can make markets, carry it, or allocate capital to something more interesting. However Kabu.com’s ¥6/share dividend for end March 2019 WILL BE PAID according to a press release by Kabu.com today after the close. That means there will be a down-shift in price on the ex-date of the dividend at end-March.

• (link to Travis’ insight: KDDI Tender Offer for Kabu.com (8703 JP) Decided)
  

Denso Corp (6902 JP) (Mkt Cap: $33.4bn; Liquidity: $73mn)

Via subsidiary NSITEXE, Inc, Denso has acquired a stake in Californian start-up quadric.io. NSITEXE was established to develop high performance, next generation semiconductor devices for automated driving solutions. quadric’s edge processing units compliment this technology push.

(link to LightStream Research‘s insight: Stake in Quadric.io Following Renesas; Denso Attempts to Keep Chip Makers Close to Achieve AD Aims) 

Xingfa Aluminium (98 HK) (Mkt Cap: $306mn; Liquidity: $0.1mn)

Xingfa announced its major shareholder, Guangxin Aluminium (a wholly-owned Guangdong SASAC vehicle), has acquired 5,000 shares, lifting its stake to 30.001%, triggering a mandatory general offer. The offer price is $5.60, a premium of just 2.94% to last close.

• Guangxin, together with certain management of Xingfa, attempted to take Xingfa private at $3.70/share back in 1H17. That scheme failed comprehensively, which was a good outcome for minorities as FY17 net income increased 28%. 1H18 profit was also a 25% improvement over the corresponding period.
• The offer price is in line with where Xingfa traded last October and is 23% below the recent peak back in mid-June 2018. It is also 37% below where China Lesso Group Holdings (2128 HK) acquired its 26.3% stake in April last year.
• There has to be some behind the scenes play for Xingfa’s shares, and this potentially centres on China Lesso. While a look at CCASS shows Liao Yuqing (an ED in Xingfa) intriguingly moving his entire 48.2mn (11.5% of shares out) outside of CCASS in early December 2018.

(link to my insight: Guangxin Reloads A Peculiar Low-Ball Offer For Xingfa Aluminium)

Oslo Bors VPS Holding ASA (OSLO NS) (Mkt Cap: $803mn; Liquidity: $1mn)

OSLO NS is the target of competing tender offers from Euronext NV (ENX FP)andNasdaq Inc (NDAQ US). Euronext owns 5.3% and has irrevocables for 45.2% of OSLO NS shares, for 50.5% total. It launched an Offer to acquire all shares at NOK 145, and just raised that to NOK 158 on February 11, 2019. Nasdaq has irrevocables for 35.2% of OSLO NS shares and has launched an Offer to acquire all OSLO NS shares at NOK 152 per share. Nasdaq’s Offer received the unanimous recommendation of Oslo Børs VPS’s Board when it was announced. The IFA opined that NOK 152 per share is above the top end of what shareholders could expect.

• Nasdaq’s undertakings are irrevocable and binding, including in the event of a higher offer. The pre-acceptances further include an obligation on the part of the pre-accepting shareholders not to accept the Euronext Offer. Irrevocables for both bidders have an end date of 31 December 2019, after which they are no longer binding.
• Nasdaq, which is conditional on a 90% acceptance level, seems to have the weaker hand since its acceptance threshold condition won’t be met unless Euronext folds its cards and walks away; while Euronext (with a 50.01% acceptance condition) can keep its 50.5% “stake” as long as it gets regulatory approval. Therefore, Nasdaq would need to waive its 90% acceptance condition in order to stay in the game.

• The Norwegian Ministry of Finance MoF may resolve this by approving both bidders, provided they reach a super majority acceptance threshold of two-thirds or 90% of shares outstanding (but not less). In this scenario, either party will have enough to block the other from reaching the threshold while the irrevocables are binding.

• If the MoF says both parties have approval if they get to whatever super majority the MoF decides or is statutorily permitted to impose, and puts a deadline on getting there of some date after the irrevocable lock-up expiration (say, January 31, 2020), then the formerly locked-up shares are free to go to whichever bidder they chose.

(link to John’s insight: Oslo Børs, Euronext and Nasdaq – Shootout at the NOK Corral)

Hang Lung (10 HK) / Hang Lung Properties (101 HK)

I estimate HLG’s discount to NAV at 41% compared to its one-year average of 38%. The implied stub is right at the 2STD extreme and excluding a brief dip in late April 2018, is at the lowest level since June 2013.

• What assets HLG does directly own at the stub level are intertwined with HLP’s own investments. There is therefore, very little to distinguish between the two companies. In addition, HLG has gradually offloaded its HK properties – to HLP no less – further increasing its exposure to China and blurring the lines between HLP and HLG’s business exposure.

•  HLG has also been increasing its stake in HLP since June 2011, from 48.96% to 57.62% as at 31 Dec 2018. It’s a pretty astute trade to sell a property at book to HLP, then “buy” it back indirectly via increasing its stake in HLP, which trades at 0.6x P/B.
• There is no significant catalyst for the NAV discount to narrow. And liquidity does play a role, although HLG’s volume has narrowed the gap to HLP’s in recent years. Nevertheless, a ~40% discount to NAV is extreme for a straightforward, passive, single stock holdco structure.

(link to my insight: StubWorld: Hang Lung’s Implied Stub At Extreme Levels)

Intouch Holdings (INTUCH TB) / Advanced Info Service (ADVANC TB)

Athaporn Arayasantiparb, CFA discussed his one-on-one with Intouch. Of interest is his discussions on the stub assets specifically InVent, a venture capital arm and considered the market leader in growth stage funding. In 2018, InVent invested Bt30m into ytm thailand, an end-to-end digital marketing and feedback platform, which used the proceeds to buy offline digital access; Bt40m into Choco CRM, a CRM and POS (point of sales) platform for SME; and Bt40m into E Studio, a B2C lifestyle portal.

• Other investments discussed by Athaporn, at the stub level, include Wongnai and HSN. Wongnai is an online foodie guide and one of their largest investments to date, boasted 8m active users, 120m page views, 200,000 patron restaurants, and 10m pictures posted so far. Revenue grew 60% in 2018 to Bt250mn, and is expected to grow at 50%. HSN is an online shopping venture between Intuch and Hyundai, which managed to breakeven on a net basis.
• The overall value of these investments, and the estimated 11 other start-up companies under InVent, is very much a “finger in the air” calculation. They may exceed the value of Intouch’s 41.1% stake in Thaicom Pcl (THCOM TB), but that still would be just 1% of NAV.
• I estimate Intouch’s discount to NAV at ~21% (vs. the one-year average of 27%), having significantly narrowed in response to rumours of a purported sale of Thaicom (discussed in StubWorld: Intouch Gains On Possible Sale of Thaicom). At the time, I thought Intouch had run its course, noting Intouch had denied any definitive approach/agreement.
• New Street Research also met with AIS and remains cautious on this telco in the current slowing environment ahead of delayed elections.

links to:
Athaporn’s insight: Catch-Up Session with Intuch Group
New Street’s insight: AIS Growth Has Been Slowing as DTAC Returns to the Scene. 2019 Outlook Uncertain.

Briefly …

• Sanghyun recommended going long Poongsan Corp (103140 KS) and short Poongsan Holdings (005810 KS) as the Poongsan Holdco/Sub duo is now at +277% of σ on a 20D MA. Using his numbers, I back out a discount to NAV of 52.8%, bang in line with its 12-month average of 51.3%. The parent is also very illiquid, while Corp trades around US$2mn/day. (link to Sanghyun’s insight: Poongsan Holdings Reverse Stub Trade: Current Status & Trade Approach)
• Sanghyun also recommended a Nong Shim Holdings Co (072710 KS) setup mid-week with the Holdco/Sub duo at 253% of σ. Using his numbers, I back out a discount to NAV of 47% compared with its 12-month average of 42%. As with Poongsan, the parent is also very illiquid, while Nongshim Co Ltd (004370 KS) trades around US$4mn/day. (link to Sanghyun’s insight: Nongshim Holdco/Sub Trade: Current Status & Trade Approach)

• Sand Grove’s holding in Ophir Energy (OPHR LN) is now 17.28% according to a recent filing.
• Kian Joo Can Factory (KJC MK) is subject to a conditional mandatory takeover at RM3.10/share, a 52.7% premium to last close.

My ongoing series flags large moves (~10%) in CCASS holdings over the past week or so, moves which are often outside normal market transactions.  These may be indicative of share pledges.  Or potential takeovers. Or simply help understand volume swings. 

Often these moves can easily be explained – the placement of new shares, rights issue, movements subsequent to a takeover, amongst others. For those mentioned below, I could not find an obvious reason for the CCASS move.   

In this briefing:

1. SUTL: Puteri Harbor Construction Started Last Week, Membership Sales to Follow, Cash = 84% of MktCap
2. Re-Launching Coverage of ZTO Express with Sell Rating and US$13.31 Target Price
3. BGF Stub Trade: Sub Price Diverged Further than Usual, I’d Make Trade on Reversion
4. ECM Weekly (16 March 2019) – Embassy Office REIT, Tiger Brokers, Dongzheng Auto, Koolearn, CanSino
5. Isetan-Mitsukoshi Unveils Digital Strategy

1. SUTL: Puteri Harbor Construction Started Last Week, Membership Sales to Follow, Cash = 84% of MktCap

Sutl Enterprise (SUTL SP) did not grow revenues in 2018 as it continued to operate only its flagship Sentosa marina. Change is coming as it has 9 projects in the pipeline which could dramatically alter the financial future of the company by FY21. 

The biggest news is the groundbreaking of Puteri Harbor in Malaysia last week. With a sales gallery opening by May 2019, it will be very interesting to follow the progress on this project and its contribution to SUTL’s top/bottom-line results in FY19/FY20.

SUTL is misunderstood by investors because management disclosure is lacking and liquidity is poor. The valuation of SUTL could be improved if investors had a better understanding of the earnings trajectory we could expect in FY19-FY21.

We realize the Tay family is not looking to sell its stake anytime soon so is not concerned about its current market cap. We caution that this might not be a smart way to run a publicly listed company as a more expensive ‘currency’  (stock price) might help the company be taken more seriously when attempting to make acquisitions overseas. 

However, this does not alter the fact that 84% of the market cap is cash and the EV of this consistently profitable company is barely 6.7M USD. SUTL is undeniably one of the cheapest stocks on SGX.

2. Re-Launching Coverage of ZTO Express with Sell Rating and US$13.31 Target Price

ZTO Express (ZTO US)‘s earnings will fail to meet the high expectations of sell-side analysts and investors who seeit as a cheap proxy for Chinese e-commerce activity.

China’s express sector revenue grew 43.5% YoY in 2016, the year ZTO went public. Last year, revenue growth was just half that (21.8%), and we expect the sector’s growth to continue to moderate over the next few years.

The express sector is also evolving in ways that will put downward pressure on profitability and require greater investment from the express companies.

We expect the profitability of ZTO’s express business to decline in the medium-term as the company adjusts to slowing demand and emerging sector trends. Our earnings estimates, which are far below consensus figures, reflect these challenges.

ZTO suffers from declining earnings quality and two accounting issues that we feel make it a risky, unattractive investment. Our 12-month target price for ZTO is US$13.31, based on 16 times our blended 2019-20 EPS estimates. We rate the stock Sell.

3. BGF Stub Trade: Sub Price Diverged Further than Usual, I’d Make Trade on Reversion

• BGF Holdco/Sub have been oscillating within ±1σ since early Feb. Last Friday, Sub again made a move. This time it diverted a little further. They are now close to -2σ. Holdco is now at a 46% discount to NAV.
• Overall sector outlook is still unpromising. Local street sentiments are still divided. BGF Retail is showing interest in Korea’s third internet bank. This may become a price divergence factor. But this issue is still too early to have real impact.
• Shorting is still going pretty heavy on Sub. Sub price divergence shouldn’t last any further from this point. I’d make my trade here.

4. ECM Weekly (16 March 2019) – Embassy Office REIT, Tiger Brokers, Dongzheng Auto, Koolearn, CanSino

Aequitas Research puts out a weekly update on the deals that have been covered by Smartkarma Insight Providers recently, along with updates for upcoming IPOs.

Accuracy Rate:

Our overall accuracy rate is 72.4% for IPOs and 63.7% for Placements 

(Performance measurement criteria is explained at the end of the note)

New IPO filings

• FriendTimes Inc. (Hong Kong, >US$100m)
• Frontage (Hong Kong, re-filed)

Below is a snippet of our IPO tool showing upcoming events for the next week. The IPO tool is designed to provide readers with timely information on all IPO related events (Book open/closing, listing, initiation, lock-up expiry, etc) for all the deals that we have worked on. You can access the tool here or through the tools menu.

News on Upcoming IPOs

• UBS and Rivals to Pay $100 Million to Settle Hong Kong IPO Cases
• Chinese Luxury Car Finance Firm Seeks $428 Million in Hong Kong IPO
• Online Educator Koolearn to Raise up to $233 Million in Hong Kong IPO
• Resurgence in Indian IPO market likely only after general elections
• Homeplus K-REIT Withdraws $1.5 Billion Korean IPO on Weak Demand
• Prospa may revive listing plan after beating prospectus forecasts
• Luckin Coffee chairman said to tap banks for $200m loan in exchange for IPO role

This week Analysis on Upcoming IPO

• Homeplus REIT IPO: A Key Landmark Deal in the History of the Korean REIT Market
• Up Fintech (Tiger Brokers) IPO Quick Take – It’s Not like Futu, Won’t Perform like It Either
• Embassy Office Parks REIT IPO – FY19 Revised Down, Yield Propped up by Zero Coupon Bond
• CanSino Biologics (康希诺) IPO: Valuation Update (Part 3)
• Dongzheng Auto Finance (东正汽车金融) IPO Review – Better off Buying the Parent
• Koolearn (新东方在线) IPO Review – Yet to See Results from Increased Spending

5. Isetan-Mitsukoshi Unveils Digital Strategy

Three years ago, Isetan-Mitsukoshi attempted to reverse a strategy of shifting to small format retailing.

At the same time, the department store operator made a final ditch effort to avoid closing department stores and sacked its CEO who had had the temerity to suggest closure was the only way to revive the business.

Last year new management finally realised the old CEO had been right and that culling stores was the only way to improve profit growth.

Now the company is diversifying again but, instead of just small stores, it is planning a big investment into e-commerce with a projected ¥145 billion in sales from personal styling alone.

In this briefing:

1. Musashino Bank  (8336 JP): Braking Bad
2. Last Week in Event SPACE: Softbank, Delta, U-Shin, CJ Hello, Glow, Sigma, Oslo Bors, Hang Lung

1. Musashino Bank  (8336 JP): Braking Bad

Musashino Bank (8336 JP) was one of the last regional banks to announce 3Q FY3/2019 results, and they were a nasty surprise: a consolidated net loss for the nine months to 31 December 2018, caused by heavy reserving in Q3 (October-December 2018) against the bank’s exposure to the troubled Akebono Brake Industry Co (7238 JP) .  While the bank has slashed its full-year net profit guidance from ¥11.1 billion to ¥4.5 billion, this would still require an heroic level of profits in Q4 which the bank has never before achieved.  The share price has fallen over 31% in the last twelve months.  Valuations at current levels are still high (FY3/2019 PER is 17.6x) and we consider the share price to be vulnerable to further weakness.  Caveat emptor (May the buyer beware) !

2. Last Week in Event SPACE: Softbank, Delta, U-Shin, CJ Hello, Glow, Sigma, Oslo Bors, Hang Lung

Last Week in Event SPACE …

• Softbank Group (9984 JP)‘s discount to NAV could narrow with Softbank looking to buy 10-13% of Real World Float.
• Excessive unknowns heading into Delta Electronics Thai (DELTA TB)‘s tender offer announcement.
• The price and process for the tender Offer for U Shin Ltd (6985 JP) is simply confounding.
• Taekwang Industrial (003240 KS)‘s 53.9% stake in Tbroad in the spotlight after LG Uplus Corp (032640 KS) takes a majority stake in Cj Hellovision (037560 KS).
• Global Power Synergy Company Ltd (GPSC TB)‘s rekindled Offer for Glow Energy Pcl (GLOW TB) should be priced similarly to its prior tilt.
• The fundamental drift and likelihood of a Sigma Healthcare (SIG AU) deal with API remain good.
• Has the contest for Oslo Bors VPS Holding ASA (OSLO NS) reached a Mexican standoff?
• Hang Lung (10 HK)‘s implied stub is at its widest since June 2013, outside a brief downward spike in in late April 2018.
• Plus CCASS movements and expected upcoming events for key M&A transactions.

(This insight covers specific insights & comments involving Stubs, Pairs, Arbitrage, share Classification and Events – or SPACE – in the past week)

Softbank Group (9984 JP) (Mkt Cap: $106bn; Liquidity: $795mn)

Softbank has announced a buyback of ¥600bn – its largest buyback ever. At ~¥10,500/share it is 57mm shares or 5.2% of shares out. At ¥12,000/share it is 50mm shares or 4.6%. The “official” float is about 68.7% or 750mm shares. However, by Travis’ estimate, only 44.5% of shares out or 488mm shares are Real World Float. 57mm shares out of 488mm shares is 11.7%.  That is a non-negligible portion of float, and will mean significant reduction in foreign active management exposure to Softbank, or significant reduction in individual investor exposure to Softbank, or both. 

• Travis Lundy wrote the buyback will have further impact on the stock price simply because of flow dynamics. It isn’t easy to buy 10% of float. And we should remember that the BOJ is still buying ¥100bn+ of Softbank shares per year as it continues to buy ¥6trln of ETFs per year. And given the stock will be in the top momentum ranks of large cap Japan, Travis expects momentum flows will join the party adding more inflow.
• For trading types, he thought Softbank was a buy, relatively and on an absolute basis. The Japan market is CHEAP on a current year and forecast year ahead, which suggests either the market is “wrong” or economic headwinds are picking up to a greater extent than pundits suggest. 

(link to Travis insight: Softbank Buyback More Than It Appears To Be)

Delta Electronics Thai (DELTA TB) (Mkt Cap: $2.8bn; Liquidity: $2mn)

The pre-conditons have been fulfilled and Delta Electronics (2308 TT) will now move to a tender offer. But there exist a number of unknowns for the transaction, which could delay the Offer timetable.

• Although the initial wording in the August conditional voluntary tender offer announcement suggests the offer will be for ALL shares, there is talk there may be a maximum acceptance condition, therefore possible clawback for shareholders tendering. A rumoured 60% maximum translates to a minimum 50% pro-rata, potentially 67% if the family tenders 40% and the rest of holders tender half.

• It is not clear whether the FY18 dividend will be netted. DELTA has announced two sets of quarterly results since the initial Offer announcement and it would be unjust for DEISG to net off any dividend.  It would likely suit the family to receive the dividend. The Offer is pitched at a 1.79% premium to the then-current price. If the dividend is netted, then the Offer price will, in fact, be at a discount to last close as of announcement. DELTA will announce its full-year dividend tomorrow (18th February) and the terms of the deal may also be announced the same day. The AGM to ratify the dividend will take place around the 2 April.
• Currently trading at terms or a gross/annualised spread of 4.6/21%, if including a Bt3.30 FY18 dividend and mid-May payment. That looks overly tight in the face of timing delays and actual consideration to be paid if indeed it comes out to be a partial offer.

(link to my insight: Delta’s Less-Than-Straightforward Tender Offer)

U Shin Ltd (6985 JP) (Mkt Cap: $294mn; Liquidity: $2mn)

Three months ago, Minebea Mitsumi (6479 JP) announced it would launch a Tender Offer for U Shin and it would take just under three months until the approvals were received and it could officially start the Tender Offer process. The background to the Tender Offer was discussed in Minebea Mitsumi Launches Offer for U-SHIN in early November. Travis first conclusion in November was that this was the “riskiest” straight-out non-hostile TOB he had seen in a while.  Minebea Mitsumi has now announced the launch of its Tender Offer, at the same price as originally planned (¥985/share). 

• This deal is still perplexing to Travis. It’s easy enough from an industrial standpoint. Why not buy relatively cheap assets then see if you can cross-sell or assume some attrition? But for investors, he wonders why they put up with this. The process of reaching a “fair” valuation is, by definition, conflicted. It cannot NOT be conflicted. And just because some independent directors who don’t have skin in the game, and may have no clue about corporate valuation methodology, or fair market price, agree to a price that the acquiree’s managers, not wanting to lose their jobs, agree to doesn’t make this “fair.”
• The tender offer period is QUITE long. Most tender offers are 30 days in order to give time for people to tender or “offer sufficient time for a rival bidder.” This time Travis thinks it is longer so people can take their time and get bored and tender.
• Travis would sell shares now and use the balance sheet elsewhere until an activist shows his hand. If no activist, this deal is not an interesting one. 

(link to Travis’ insight: Minebea-Mitsumi Underpriced Tender for U SHIN (6985 JP) Launched)

Cj Hellovision (037560 KS) (Mkt Cap: $720mn; Liquidity: $5mn)

After multiple news outlets reported that LG Uplus Corp (032640 KS) will finalise a transaction with the CJ Hello, a deal was done at ₩800bn (instead of ₩1tn speculated), and only 50%+1 share instead of the full 53.92% stake held by CJ ENM (035760 KS). The acquisition price of ₩20,659 is a 107% premium to last price and translates to a EV/EBITDA multiple of 6.6x. 

• This is a straight stock acquisition deal. CJ Hello will be a subsidiary of LG Uplus and will continue to exist as a separate listed company. CJ ENM still owns nearly 4% CJH stake. SKT owns 8.61%. 
• LG Group is publicly saying that they have no plan of an immediate merger, which means neither party requires shareholder approval. But the transaction is subject to local regulator approval – MSIT and  Korea FTC. MSIT approval is not an issue. FTC rejected the SKT-CJH deal last time. This time, the FTC’s head Kim Sang-jo is hinting that this deal will go through.
• LG Uplus’ acquisition of CJ Hellovision is likely to further accelerate the consolidation of the Korean cable TV/media sector. KT Corp (030200 KS) is now likely to aggressively try to acquire cable-operator D’Live. SK Telecom (017670 KS) has shown some interests in acquiring Tbroad cable company. 
• Douglas Kim reckons Taekwang Industrial (003240 KS) 53.9% stake in Tbroad – also a possible target – may be worth ₩600bn or nearly 35% of its market cap. 

links to:
Sanghyun Park‘s insight: ‘ insight: LG Uplus – CJ Hello Acquisition: Current Status & Trade Approach
Douglas’ insight: Korea M&A Spotlight: LGUplus to Acquire CJ Hellovision: What’s Next for Tbroad and D’Live?
Sanghyun’s follow-up insight: LG Uplus – CJ Hello Acquisition: Current Yield Is 10%, CJH Overhang Concerns Will Push It Up

Glow Energy Pcl (GLOW TB)(Mkt Cap: $4.2bn; Liquidity: $4mn)

Glow announced that the Energy Regulatory Commission (“ERC”) has resolved to approve the merger with GPSC, provided Glow sells its Glow SPP1 plant before or at the same time as the merger. A number of conditions were also attached to some of the remaining power plants. No price has been disclosed for the 69.11% stake in Glow, ex the SPP1 plant, but it will be in reference to the Bt94.892 Offer price previously announced, net of expenses with selling SPP1 and the reduced synergy thereon.

• Given SPP1 is an immaterial contributor (~5%) to Glow, in terms of revenue, it can be argued that GPSC may make only a minimal change to the Offer price.  Still, even a 5% downward adjustment would equate to a price below where Glow is trading.
• The downside is ~8%, if using the closing price on the 11 October. Glow/GPSC/Engie want this deal to complete. I think the final Offer price will come in very close to that initially proposed. But I would not buy through Bt90, preferring to pick up shares at Bt89 or below. The merger is expected to be completed by next month, triggering a mandatory tender offer, which may take an additional 2 months or so to complete.

(link to my insight: GPSC To Proceed With Glow Takeover, But At What Price?)

Sigma Healthcare (SIG AU) (Mkt Cap: $409mn; Liquidity: $2mn)

Sigma Healthcare released a 2-page Market Update saying the four month Business Review had identified A$100mm of annual cost savings, confirmed the FY19 EBIT guidance of A$75mn, and confirmed the FY20 EBITDA guidance of $55-60mm. The business review sees 10% underlying EBITDA growth from FY20 to FY23 so that after cost savings are included, FY23 sees the same EBITDA as FY19 [i.e. almost A$90mm].

• On a standalone basis, at the end of FY22 looking towards FY23, at 8x EV/EBITDA, it looks like there is something like 60-80% upside. EBITDA might be worth even more than A$90mm in FY23 as long as the DCs can run at high capacity. And at mid-high teens PER that would be a pretty great result. They won’t get that 60-80% upside from now doing a deal with API, but they won’t have to wait for 4 years to get it either. 
• Travis expects another A$0.15 of value would do it. He doesn’t think they need A$0.20. The shares bounced and traded around A$0.80-1.00 from mid summer 2017 to mid-summer 2018. But that is when EBIT was supposed to fall to A$90mm. And that was nearer-term. Now we have a forecast of EBITDA of A$90mm and that is 3+ years out. 
• Travis thinks this could get done at 0.42-0.45 shares of API and A$0.23 of cash, given that would probably impact API shares a little bit, that would end up being a 10-15% bump vs original terms, but all told that would be pretty good – and almost a double from undisturbed.

(link to Travis’ insight: Sigma Healthcare Market Update: Strategic Review Expects More)

Kabu.Com Securities (8703 JP) (Mkt Cap: $1.7bn; Liquidity: $8mn)

KDDI Corp (9433 JP) announced its intention to conduct a Tender Offer for Kabu.com through a made-for-purpose SPC. The deal is not terribly different in scope than the one discussed in KDDI Deal for Kabu.com (8703 JP) Coming? about two weeks ago.

• The Tender Offer is to purchase a minimum of 45,758,400 shares at ¥559/share, which is a 5.67% premium to last close and a 46.3% premium to the undisturbed price of 23 January 2019. Obtaining the minimum would get the combination of KDDI and MUFJ Securities (which currently holds 52.96% of the shares outstanding, and will not tender) to 66.67% which would allow the combination to do a Two Step Squeezeout, which KDDI states in the document that it intends to do.
• Anti-trust and regulatory approvals are required (Travis can’t imagine any issues), and KDDI expects that the Tender Offer will commence in late April. This looks pretty easy as a deal, with few impediments. A rival bid is unlikely – KDDI has a headstart with the shares of MUFG Bank which have committed to the deal.
• This is going to be boring. One can make markets, carry it, or allocate capital to something more interesting. However Kabu.com’s ¥6/share dividend for end March 2019 WILL BE PAID according to a press release by Kabu.com today after the close. That means there will be a down-shift in price on the ex-date of the dividend at end-March.

• (link to Travis’ insight: KDDI Tender Offer for Kabu.com (8703 JP) Decided)
  

Denso Corp (6902 JP) (Mkt Cap: $33.4bn; Liquidity: $73mn)

Via subsidiary NSITEXE, Inc, Denso has acquired a stake in Californian start-up quadric.io. NSITEXE was established to develop high performance, next generation semiconductor devices for automated driving solutions. quadric’s edge processing units compliment this technology push.

(link to LightStream Research‘s insight: Stake in Quadric.io Following Renesas; Denso Attempts to Keep Chip Makers Close to Achieve AD Aims) 

Xingfa Aluminium (98 HK) (Mkt Cap: $306mn; Liquidity: $0.1mn)

Xingfa announced its major shareholder, Guangxin Aluminium (a wholly-owned Guangdong SASAC vehicle), has acquired 5,000 shares, lifting its stake to 30.001%, triggering a mandatory general offer. The offer price is $5.60, a premium of just 2.94% to last close.

• Guangxin, together with certain management of Xingfa, attempted to take Xingfa private at $3.70/share back in 1H17. That scheme failed comprehensively, which was a good outcome for minorities as FY17 net income increased 28%. 1H18 profit was also a 25% improvement over the corresponding period.
• The offer price is in line with where Xingfa traded last October and is 23% below the recent peak back in mid-June 2018. It is also 37% below where China Lesso Group Holdings (2128 HK) acquired its 26.3% stake in April last year.
• There has to be some behind the scenes play for Xingfa’s shares, and this potentially centres on China Lesso. While a look at CCASS shows Liao Yuqing (an ED in Xingfa) intriguingly moving his entire 48.2mn (11.5% of shares out) outside of CCASS in early December 2018.

(link to my insight: Guangxin Reloads A Peculiar Low-Ball Offer For Xingfa Aluminium)

Oslo Bors VPS Holding ASA (OSLO NS) (Mkt Cap: $803mn; Liquidity: $1mn)

OSLO NS is the target of competing tender offers from Euronext NV (ENX FP)andNasdaq Inc (NDAQ US). Euronext owns 5.3% and has irrevocables for 45.2% of OSLO NS shares, for 50.5% total. It launched an Offer to acquire all shares at NOK 145, and just raised that to NOK 158 on February 11, 2019. Nasdaq has irrevocables for 35.2% of OSLO NS shares and has launched an Offer to acquire all OSLO NS shares at NOK 152 per share. Nasdaq’s Offer received the unanimous recommendation of Oslo Børs VPS’s Board when it was announced. The IFA opined that NOK 152 per share is above the top end of what shareholders could expect.

• Nasdaq’s undertakings are irrevocable and binding, including in the event of a higher offer. The pre-acceptances further include an obligation on the part of the pre-accepting shareholders not to accept the Euronext Offer. Irrevocables for both bidders have an end date of 31 December 2019, after which they are no longer binding.
• Nasdaq, which is conditional on a 90% acceptance level, seems to have the weaker hand since its acceptance threshold condition won’t be met unless Euronext folds its cards and walks away; while Euronext (with a 50.01% acceptance condition) can keep its 50.5% “stake” as long as it gets regulatory approval. Therefore, Nasdaq would need to waive its 90% acceptance condition in order to stay in the game.

• The Norwegian Ministry of Finance MoF may resolve this by approving both bidders, provided they reach a super majority acceptance threshold of two-thirds or 90% of shares outstanding (but not less). In this scenario, either party will have enough to block the other from reaching the threshold while the irrevocables are binding.

• If the MoF says both parties have approval if they get to whatever super majority the MoF decides or is statutorily permitted to impose, and puts a deadline on getting there of some date after the irrevocable lock-up expiration (say, January 31, 2020), then the formerly locked-up shares are free to go to whichever bidder they chose.

(link to John’s insight: Oslo Børs, Euronext and Nasdaq – Shootout at the NOK Corral)

Hang Lung (10 HK) / Hang Lung Properties (101 HK)

I estimate HLG’s discount to NAV at 41% compared to its one-year average of 38%. The implied stub is right at the 2STD extreme and excluding a brief dip in late April 2018, is at the lowest level since June 2013.

• What assets HLG does directly own at the stub level are intertwined with HLP’s own investments. There is therefore, very little to distinguish between the two companies. In addition, HLG has gradually offloaded its HK properties – to HLP no less – further increasing its exposure to China and blurring the lines between HLP and HLG’s business exposure.

•  HLG has also been increasing its stake in HLP since June 2011, from 48.96% to 57.62% as at 31 Dec 2018. It’s a pretty astute trade to sell a property at book to HLP, then “buy” it back indirectly via increasing its stake in HLP, which trades at 0.6x P/B.
• There is no significant catalyst for the NAV discount to narrow. And liquidity does play a role, although HLG’s volume has narrowed the gap to HLP’s in recent years. Nevertheless, a ~40% discount to NAV is extreme for a straightforward, passive, single stock holdco structure.

(link to my insight: StubWorld: Hang Lung’s Implied Stub At Extreme Levels)

Intouch Holdings (INTUCH TB) / Advanced Info Service (ADVANC TB)

Athaporn Arayasantiparb, CFA discussed his one-on-one with Intouch. Of interest is his discussions on the stub assets specifically InVent, a venture capital arm and considered the market leader in growth stage funding. In 2018, InVent invested Bt30m into ytm thailand, an end-to-end digital marketing and feedback platform, which used the proceeds to buy offline digital access; Bt40m into Choco CRM, a CRM and POS (point of sales) platform for SME; and Bt40m into E Studio, a B2C lifestyle portal.

• Other investments discussed by Athaporn, at the stub level, include Wongnai and HSN. Wongnai is an online foodie guide and one of their largest investments to date, boasted 8m active users, 120m page views, 200,000 patron restaurants, and 10m pictures posted so far. Revenue grew 60% in 2018 to Bt250mn, and is expected to grow at 50%. HSN is an online shopping venture between Intuch and Hyundai, which managed to breakeven on a net basis.
• The overall value of these investments, and the estimated 11 other start-up companies under InVent, is very much a “finger in the air” calculation. They may exceed the value of Intouch’s 41.1% stake in Thaicom Pcl (THCOM TB), but that still would be just 1% of NAV.
• I estimate Intouch’s discount to NAV at ~21% (vs. the one-year average of 27%), having significantly narrowed in response to rumours of a purported sale of Thaicom (discussed in StubWorld: Intouch Gains On Possible Sale of Thaicom). At the time, I thought Intouch had run its course, noting Intouch had denied any definitive approach/agreement.
• New Street Research also met with AIS and remains cautious on this telco in the current slowing environment ahead of delayed elections.

links to:
Athaporn’s insight: Catch-Up Session with Intuch Group
New Street’s insight: AIS Growth Has Been Slowing as DTAC Returns to the Scene. 2019 Outlook Uncertain.

Briefly …

• Sanghyun recommended going long Poongsan Corp (103140 KS) and short Poongsan Holdings (005810 KS) as the Poongsan Holdco/Sub duo is now at +277% of σ on a 20D MA. Using his numbers, I back out a discount to NAV of 52.8%, bang in line with its 12-month average of 51.3%. The parent is also very illiquid, while Corp trades around US$2mn/day. (link to Sanghyun’s insight: Poongsan Holdings Reverse Stub Trade: Current Status & Trade Approach)
• Sanghyun also recommended a Nong Shim Holdings Co (072710 KS) setup mid-week with the Holdco/Sub duo at 253% of σ. Using his numbers, I back out a discount to NAV of 47% compared with its 12-month average of 42%. As with Poongsan, the parent is also very illiquid, while Nongshim Co Ltd (004370 KS) trades around US$4mn/day. (link to Sanghyun’s insight: Nongshim Holdco/Sub Trade: Current Status & Trade Approach)

• Sand Grove’s holding in Ophir Energy (OPHR LN) is now 17.28% according to a recent filing.
• Kian Joo Can Factory (KJC MK) is subject to a conditional mandatory takeover at RM3.10/share, a 52.7% premium to last close.

My ongoing series flags large moves (~10%) in CCASS holdings over the past week or so, moves which are often outside normal market transactions.  These may be indicative of share pledges.  Or potential takeovers. Or simply help understand volume swings. 

Often these moves can easily be explained – the placement of new shares, rights issue, movements subsequent to a takeover, amongst others. For those mentioned below, I could not find an obvious reason for the CCASS move.   

In this briefing:

1. Re-Launching Coverage of ZTO Express with Sell Rating and US$13.31 Target Price
2. BGF Stub Trade: Sub Price Diverged Further than Usual, I’d Make Trade on Reversion
3. ECM Weekly (16 March 2019) – Embassy Office REIT, Tiger Brokers, Dongzheng Auto, Koolearn, CanSino
4. Isetan-Mitsukoshi Unveils Digital Strategy
5. Tesla  – Now We Know The Y, But Not the How

1. Re-Launching Coverage of ZTO Express with Sell Rating and US$13.31 Target Price

ZTO Express (ZTO US)‘s earnings will fail to meet the high expectations of sell-side analysts and investors who seeit as a cheap proxy for Chinese e-commerce activity.

China’s express sector revenue grew 43.5% YoY in 2016, the year ZTO went public. Last year, revenue growth was just half that (21.8%), and we expect the sector’s growth to continue to moderate over the next few years.

The express sector is also evolving in ways that will put downward pressure on profitability and require greater investment from the express companies.

We expect the profitability of ZTO’s express business to decline in the medium-term as the company adjusts to slowing demand and emerging sector trends. Our earnings estimates, which are far below consensus figures, reflect these challenges.

ZTO suffers from declining earnings quality and two accounting issues that we feel make it a risky, unattractive investment. Our 12-month target price for ZTO is US$13.31, based on 16 times our blended 2019-20 EPS estimates. We rate the stock Sell.

2. BGF Stub Trade: Sub Price Diverged Further than Usual, I’d Make Trade on Reversion

• BGF Holdco/Sub have been oscillating within ±1σ since early Feb. Last Friday, Sub again made a move. This time it diverted a little further. They are now close to -2σ. Holdco is now at a 46% discount to NAV.
• Overall sector outlook is still unpromising. Local street sentiments are still divided. BGF Retail is showing interest in Korea’s third internet bank. This may become a price divergence factor. But this issue is still too early to have real impact.
• Shorting is still going pretty heavy on Sub. Sub price divergence shouldn’t last any further from this point. I’d make my trade here.

3. ECM Weekly (16 March 2019) – Embassy Office REIT, Tiger Brokers, Dongzheng Auto, Koolearn, CanSino

Aequitas Research puts out a weekly update on the deals that have been covered by Smartkarma Insight Providers recently, along with updates for upcoming IPOs.

Accuracy Rate:

Our overall accuracy rate is 72.4% for IPOs and 63.7% for Placements 

(Performance measurement criteria is explained at the end of the note)

New IPO filings

• FriendTimes Inc. (Hong Kong, >US$100m)
• Frontage (Hong Kong, re-filed)

Below is a snippet of our IPO tool showing upcoming events for the next week. The IPO tool is designed to provide readers with timely information on all IPO related events (Book open/closing, listing, initiation, lock-up expiry, etc) for all the deals that we have worked on. You can access the tool here or through the tools menu.

News on Upcoming IPOs

• UBS and Rivals to Pay $100 Million to Settle Hong Kong IPO Cases
• Chinese Luxury Car Finance Firm Seeks $428 Million in Hong Kong IPO
• Online Educator Koolearn to Raise up to $233 Million in Hong Kong IPO
• Resurgence in Indian IPO market likely only after general elections
• Homeplus K-REIT Withdraws $1.5 Billion Korean IPO on Weak Demand
• Prospa may revive listing plan after beating prospectus forecasts
• Luckin Coffee chairman said to tap banks for $200m loan in exchange for IPO role

This week Analysis on Upcoming IPO

• Homeplus REIT IPO: A Key Landmark Deal in the History of the Korean REIT Market
• Up Fintech (Tiger Brokers) IPO Quick Take – It’s Not like Futu, Won’t Perform like It Either
• Embassy Office Parks REIT IPO – FY19 Revised Down, Yield Propped up by Zero Coupon Bond
• CanSino Biologics (康希诺) IPO: Valuation Update (Part 3)
• Dongzheng Auto Finance (东正汽车金融) IPO Review – Better off Buying the Parent
• Koolearn (新东方在线) IPO Review – Yet to See Results from Increased Spending

4. Isetan-Mitsukoshi Unveils Digital Strategy

Three years ago, Isetan-Mitsukoshi attempted to reverse a strategy of shifting to small format retailing.

At the same time, the department store operator made a final ditch effort to avoid closing department stores and sacked its CEO who had had the temerity to suggest closure was the only way to revive the business.

Last year new management finally realised the old CEO had been right and that culling stores was the only way to improve profit growth.

Now the company is diversifying again but, instead of just small stores, it is planning a big investment into e-commerce with a projected ¥145 billion in sales from personal styling alone.

5. Tesla  – Now We Know The Y, But Not the How

Tesla Motors (TSLA US) unveiled Model Y on, perhaps not coincidentally, March 14th which also is Pi Day. Pi is the fundamental ratio which demonstrates that all circles are related–as Model Y is overwhelmingly related with the seminal Model 3 which contributes 75-80% of the newcomer’s platform and technology.

Which means Model Y may be originating with Model 3’s many inherent problems, as I discussed in Tesla’s Plan B 2.0; Y Not, just as Tesla also is juggling the ramp-up of the newly launched $35,000-base model of Model 3 along with sales expansion into Europe and China as well as building a new plant on a shoestring in Shanghai. All this just as the company also has lurched into a radical new online-only sales model with apparently little if any considered preparation (see Tesla’s New Plan: Buy Before You Try).

No wonder Tesla’s Vice President of Engineering Michael Schwekutsch just quit, an ominous signal.

Another is that Model Y won’t be available until late 2020–at best–which is much later than expected. It’s still not clear when or where Model Y will be in full production or, even more critical, when Tesla will make even a penny of profit on it. Model 3 only recently became marginally profitable, excluding the likely money-losing $35k version, and sales of more profitable but aging Models S and X are in accelerating decline.

And, as I observed last week, Tesla’s track record of long delays in delivering new models coupled with Model 3’s alarming quality and reliability may seriously diminish the hoped-for early bird reservation cash which the company sorely needs to ease its liquidity crunch. At the same time, the pending arrival of Model Y over the next year or so is likely to further dampen already waning demand for Model 3.

In any case, it’s too late for Tesla to preserve profitability in the calamitous first quarter, if not for the full year.

Continue reading for Bond Angle analysis.

In this briefing:

1. BGF Stub Trade: Sub Price Diverged Further than Usual, I’d Make Trade on Reversion
2. ECM Weekly (16 March 2019) – Embassy Office REIT, Tiger Brokers, Dongzheng Auto, Koolearn, CanSino
3. Isetan-Mitsukoshi Unveils Digital Strategy
4. Tesla  – Now We Know The Y, But Not the How
5. Indonesia Property – In Search of the End of the Rainbow – Part 4 – Alam Sutera Realty (ASRI IJ)

1. BGF Stub Trade: Sub Price Diverged Further than Usual, I’d Make Trade on Reversion

• BGF Holdco/Sub have been oscillating within ±1σ since early Feb. Last Friday, Sub again made a move. This time it diverted a little further. They are now close to -2σ. Holdco is now at a 46% discount to NAV.
• Overall sector outlook is still unpromising. Local street sentiments are still divided. BGF Retail is showing interest in Korea’s third internet bank. This may become a price divergence factor. But this issue is still too early to have real impact.
• Shorting is still going pretty heavy on Sub. Sub price divergence shouldn’t last any further from this point. I’d make my trade here.

2. ECM Weekly (16 March 2019) – Embassy Office REIT, Tiger Brokers, Dongzheng Auto, Koolearn, CanSino

Aequitas Research puts out a weekly update on the deals that have been covered by Smartkarma Insight Providers recently, along with updates for upcoming IPOs.

Accuracy Rate:

Our overall accuracy rate is 72.4% for IPOs and 63.7% for Placements 

(Performance measurement criteria is explained at the end of the note)

New IPO filings

• FriendTimes Inc. (Hong Kong, >US$100m)
• Frontage (Hong Kong, re-filed)

Below is a snippet of our IPO tool showing upcoming events for the next week. The IPO tool is designed to provide readers with timely information on all IPO related events (Book open/closing, listing, initiation, lock-up expiry, etc) for all the deals that we have worked on. You can access the tool here or through the tools menu.

News on Upcoming IPOs

• UBS and Rivals to Pay $100 Million to Settle Hong Kong IPO Cases
• Chinese Luxury Car Finance Firm Seeks $428 Million in Hong Kong IPO
• Online Educator Koolearn to Raise up to $233 Million in Hong Kong IPO
• Resurgence in Indian IPO market likely only after general elections
• Homeplus K-REIT Withdraws $1.5 Billion Korean IPO on Weak Demand
• Prospa may revive listing plan after beating prospectus forecasts
• Luckin Coffee chairman said to tap banks for $200m loan in exchange for IPO role

This week Analysis on Upcoming IPO

• Homeplus REIT IPO: A Key Landmark Deal in the History of the Korean REIT Market
• Up Fintech (Tiger Brokers) IPO Quick Take – It’s Not like Futu, Won’t Perform like It Either
• Embassy Office Parks REIT IPO – FY19 Revised Down, Yield Propped up by Zero Coupon Bond
• CanSino Biologics (康希诺) IPO: Valuation Update (Part 3)
• Dongzheng Auto Finance (东正汽车金融) IPO Review – Better off Buying the Parent
• Koolearn (新东方在线) IPO Review – Yet to See Results from Increased Spending

3. Isetan-Mitsukoshi Unveils Digital Strategy

Three years ago, Isetan-Mitsukoshi attempted to reverse a strategy of shifting to small format retailing.

At the same time, the department store operator made a final ditch effort to avoid closing department stores and sacked its CEO who had had the temerity to suggest closure was the only way to revive the business.

Last year new management finally realised the old CEO had been right and that culling stores was the only way to improve profit growth.

Now the company is diversifying again but, instead of just small stores, it is planning a big investment into e-commerce with a projected ¥145 billion in sales from personal styling alone.

4. Tesla  – Now We Know The Y, But Not the How

Tesla Motors (TSLA US) unveiled Model Y on, perhaps not coincidentally, March 14th which also is Pi Day. Pi is the fundamental ratio which demonstrates that all circles are related–as Model Y is overwhelmingly related with the seminal Model 3 which contributes 75-80% of the newcomer’s platform and technology.

Which means Model Y may be originating with Model 3’s many inherent problems, as I discussed in Tesla’s Plan B 2.0; Y Not, just as Tesla also is juggling the ramp-up of the newly launched $35,000-base model of Model 3 along with sales expansion into Europe and China as well as building a new plant on a shoestring in Shanghai. All this just as the company also has lurched into a radical new online-only sales model with apparently little if any considered preparation (see Tesla’s New Plan: Buy Before You Try).

No wonder Tesla’s Vice President of Engineering Michael Schwekutsch just quit, an ominous signal.

Another is that Model Y won’t be available until late 2020–at best–which is much later than expected. It’s still not clear when or where Model Y will be in full production or, even more critical, when Tesla will make even a penny of profit on it. Model 3 only recently became marginally profitable, excluding the likely money-losing $35k version, and sales of more profitable but aging Models S and X are in accelerating decline.

And, as I observed last week, Tesla’s track record of long delays in delivering new models coupled with Model 3’s alarming quality and reliability may seriously diminish the hoped-for early bird reservation cash which the company sorely needs to ease its liquidity crunch. At the same time, the pending arrival of Model Y over the next year or so is likely to further dampen already waning demand for Model 3.

In any case, it’s too late for Tesla to preserve profitability in the calamitous first quarter, if not for the full year.

Continue reading for Bond Angle analysis.

5. Indonesia Property – In Search of the End of the Rainbow – Part 4 – Alam Sutera Realty (ASRI IJ)

In this series under Smartkarma Originals, CrossASEAN insight providers AngusMackintosh and Jessica Irene seek to determine whether or not we are close to the end of the rainbow and to a period of outperformance for the property sector. Our end conclusions will be based on a series of company visits to the major listed property companies in Indonesia, conversations with local banks, property agents, and other relevant channel checks. 

The fourth company that we explore is township developer Alam Sutera Realty (ASRI IJ), which provides an interesting exposure to a mix of landed housing, high-rise and low-rise condominiums through its Alam Sutera Township near Serpong and its Pasir Kemis township 15 km further out on the toll road. 

Given the diminishing area of high-value land bank in Alam Sutera, the company has shifted emphasis towards selling low-rise condominiums and commercial lots for shop houses, which has been a success story. 

Alam Sutera Realty (ASRI IJ) also has a contract with a Chinese developer, China Fortune Land Development (CFLD), to develop a total of 500 ha over a five year period in its Pasir Kamis Township.  This has provided a fillip for the company during a quiet period of marketing sales and will continue to underpin earnings for the next 2 years.

The company stands to benefit from the completion of two new toll-roads, one soon to be completed to the south connecting directly to BSD City and longer term a new toll to Soekarno Hatta Airport to the north.

It will start to utilise new land bank in North Serpong in 2021, which will extend the development potential in the area significantly longer-term. 

Management is optimistic about marketing sales for 2019 and expects growth of +16% versus last year’s number, which already exceeded expectations.

Alam Sutera Realty (ASRI IJ) has less recurrent income than peers at around 10% of total revenue but has the potential to see better contributions from the Garuda Wisnu Kencana Cultural Centre (GWK) in Bali. 

The new regulations on the booking of sales financed by mortgages introduced in August 2018 will benefit Alam Sutera Realty (ASRI IJ) from a cash flow perspective. Given that the company is consistently producing free cash flow, this is also a strong deleveraging story.

One of the biggest risks for the company is its US$ debt, which totals US$480m and is made up of two bonds expiring in 2020 and 2022. 

From a valuation perspective, Alam Sutera Realty (ASRI IJ) looks very interesting, trading on 4.9x FY19E PER, at 0.67x PBV, and at a 71% discount to NAV. On all three measures, at 1 STD below its historical mean. Our target price of IDR600 takes a blended approach, based on the company trading at historical mean on all three measures implies upside of 91% from current levels. Catalysts include better marketing sales from its low-rise developments at its Alam Sutera township and further cluster sales there, a pick-up in sales and pricing at its Pasir Kemis township, a sale of its office inventory at The Tower, a pick up in recurrent income driven by improving tenant mix at GWK. Given that the company has high levels of US$ debt, a stable currency will also benefit the company. A more dovish outlook on interest rates will also be a positive, given a large and rising portion of buyers use a mortgage to buy its properties. 

In this briefing:

1. ECM Weekly (16 March 2019) – Embassy Office REIT, Tiger Brokers, Dongzheng Auto, Koolearn, CanSino
2. Isetan-Mitsukoshi Unveils Digital Strategy
3. Tesla  – Now We Know The Y, But Not the How
4. Indonesia Property – In Search of the End of the Rainbow – Part 4 – Alam Sutera Realty (ASRI IJ)
5. Koolearn (新东方在线) IPO Review – Yet to See Results from Increased Spending

1. ECM Weekly (16 March 2019) – Embassy Office REIT, Tiger Brokers, Dongzheng Auto, Koolearn, CanSino

Aequitas Research puts out a weekly update on the deals that have been covered by Smartkarma Insight Providers recently, along with updates for upcoming IPOs.

Accuracy Rate:

Our overall accuracy rate is 72.4% for IPOs and 63.7% for Placements 

(Performance measurement criteria is explained at the end of the note)

New IPO filings

• FriendTimes Inc. (Hong Kong, >US$100m)
• Frontage (Hong Kong, re-filed)

Below is a snippet of our IPO tool showing upcoming events for the next week. The IPO tool is designed to provide readers with timely information on all IPO related events (Book open/closing, listing, initiation, lock-up expiry, etc) for all the deals that we have worked on. You can access the tool here or through the tools menu.

News on Upcoming IPOs

• UBS and Rivals to Pay $100 Million to Settle Hong Kong IPO Cases
• Chinese Luxury Car Finance Firm Seeks $428 Million in Hong Kong IPO
• Online Educator Koolearn to Raise up to $233 Million in Hong Kong IPO
• Resurgence in Indian IPO market likely only after general elections
• Homeplus K-REIT Withdraws $1.5 Billion Korean IPO on Weak Demand
• Prospa may revive listing plan after beating prospectus forecasts
• Luckin Coffee chairman said to tap banks for $200m loan in exchange for IPO role

This week Analysis on Upcoming IPO

• Homeplus REIT IPO: A Key Landmark Deal in the History of the Korean REIT Market
• Up Fintech (Tiger Brokers) IPO Quick Take – It’s Not like Futu, Won’t Perform like It Either
• Embassy Office Parks REIT IPO – FY19 Revised Down, Yield Propped up by Zero Coupon Bond
• CanSino Biologics (康希诺) IPO: Valuation Update (Part 3)
• Dongzheng Auto Finance (东正汽车金融) IPO Review – Better off Buying the Parent
• Koolearn (新东方在线) IPO Review – Yet to See Results from Increased Spending

2. Isetan-Mitsukoshi Unveils Digital Strategy

Three years ago, Isetan-Mitsukoshi attempted to reverse a strategy of shifting to small format retailing.

At the same time, the department store operator made a final ditch effort to avoid closing department stores and sacked its CEO who had had the temerity to suggest closure was the only way to revive the business.

Last year new management finally realised the old CEO had been right and that culling stores was the only way to improve profit growth.

Now the company is diversifying again but, instead of just small stores, it is planning a big investment into e-commerce with a projected ¥145 billion in sales from personal styling alone.

3. Tesla  – Now We Know The Y, But Not the How

Tesla Motors (TSLA US) unveiled Model Y on, perhaps not coincidentally, March 14th which also is Pi Day. Pi is the fundamental ratio which demonstrates that all circles are related–as Model Y is overwhelmingly related with the seminal Model 3 which contributes 75-80% of the newcomer’s platform and technology.

Which means Model Y may be originating with Model 3’s many inherent problems, as I discussed in Tesla’s Plan B 2.0; Y Not, just as Tesla also is juggling the ramp-up of the newly launched $35,000-base model of Model 3 along with sales expansion into Europe and China as well as building a new plant on a shoestring in Shanghai. All this just as the company also has lurched into a radical new online-only sales model with apparently little if any considered preparation (see Tesla’s New Plan: Buy Before You Try).

No wonder Tesla’s Vice President of Engineering Michael Schwekutsch just quit, an ominous signal.

Another is that Model Y won’t be available until late 2020–at best–which is much later than expected. It’s still not clear when or where Model Y will be in full production or, even more critical, when Tesla will make even a penny of profit on it. Model 3 only recently became marginally profitable, excluding the likely money-losing $35k version, and sales of more profitable but aging Models S and X are in accelerating decline.

And, as I observed last week, Tesla’s track record of long delays in delivering new models coupled with Model 3’s alarming quality and reliability may seriously diminish the hoped-for early bird reservation cash which the company sorely needs to ease its liquidity crunch. At the same time, the pending arrival of Model Y over the next year or so is likely to further dampen already waning demand for Model 3.

In any case, it’s too late for Tesla to preserve profitability in the calamitous first quarter, if not for the full year.

Continue reading for Bond Angle analysis.

4. Indonesia Property – In Search of the End of the Rainbow – Part 4 – Alam Sutera Realty (ASRI IJ)

In this series under Smartkarma Originals, CrossASEAN insight providers AngusMackintosh and Jessica Irene seek to determine whether or not we are close to the end of the rainbow and to a period of outperformance for the property sector. Our end conclusions will be based on a series of company visits to the major listed property companies in Indonesia, conversations with local banks, property agents, and other relevant channel checks. 

The fourth company that we explore is township developer Alam Sutera Realty (ASRI IJ), which provides an interesting exposure to a mix of landed housing, high-rise and low-rise condominiums through its Alam Sutera Township near Serpong and its Pasir Kemis township 15 km further out on the toll road. 

Given the diminishing area of high-value land bank in Alam Sutera, the company has shifted emphasis towards selling low-rise condominiums and commercial lots for shop houses, which has been a success story. 

Alam Sutera Realty (ASRI IJ) also has a contract with a Chinese developer, China Fortune Land Development (CFLD), to develop a total of 500 ha over a five year period in its Pasir Kamis Township.  This has provided a fillip for the company during a quiet period of marketing sales and will continue to underpin earnings for the next 2 years.

The company stands to benefit from the completion of two new toll-roads, one soon to be completed to the south connecting directly to BSD City and longer term a new toll to Soekarno Hatta Airport to the north.

It will start to utilise new land bank in North Serpong in 2021, which will extend the development potential in the area significantly longer-term. 

Management is optimistic about marketing sales for 2019 and expects growth of +16% versus last year’s number, which already exceeded expectations.

Alam Sutera Realty (ASRI IJ) has less recurrent income than peers at around 10% of total revenue but has the potential to see better contributions from the Garuda Wisnu Kencana Cultural Centre (GWK) in Bali. 

The new regulations on the booking of sales financed by mortgages introduced in August 2018 will benefit Alam Sutera Realty (ASRI IJ) from a cash flow perspective. Given that the company is consistently producing free cash flow, this is also a strong deleveraging story.

One of the biggest risks for the company is its US$ debt, which totals US$480m and is made up of two bonds expiring in 2020 and 2022. 

From a valuation perspective, Alam Sutera Realty (ASRI IJ) looks very interesting, trading on 4.9x FY19E PER, at 0.67x PBV, and at a 71% discount to NAV. On all three measures, at 1 STD below its historical mean. Our target price of IDR600 takes a blended approach, based on the company trading at historical mean on all three measures implies upside of 91% from current levels. Catalysts include better marketing sales from its low-rise developments at its Alam Sutera township and further cluster sales there, a pick-up in sales and pricing at its Pasir Kemis township, a sale of its office inventory at The Tower, a pick up in recurrent income driven by improving tenant mix at GWK. Given that the company has high levels of US$ debt, a stable currency will also benefit the company. A more dovish outlook on interest rates will also be a positive, given a large and rising portion of buyers use a mortgage to buy its properties. 

5. Koolearn (新东方在线) IPO Review – Yet to See Results from Increased Spending

Koolearn (1797 HK) is looking to raise up to US$S234m in its upcoming IPO.  We have previously covered the company in:

• Koolearn (新东方在线) Pre-IPO – Profitable Online Edu Company but Poor Sentiment Weighs
• New Regulatory Tightening on Online Education Reads Badly on Koolearn IPO

In this insight, we will look at the updates on financials and operating metrics, compare it to other listed online education companies, and run the deal through our framework.

The increase in spending on marketing has not yielded the intended results as the growth rates of student enrollment and gross billings slowing down. Furthermore, aggressive spending behavior is similar to that of STG and LAIX and both companies did not perform well post listing.

In this briefing:

1. SAPPE: New Strategic Partner Drive 2019 Earning Growth
2. Donki (7532 JP) Becomes Japan’s 4th Biggest Retailer
3. Postcard from Surat (India)
4. TRADE IDEA – Hang Lung (10 HK) Stub: A Timeless Arb
5. Company Visits: Berli Jucker, M Visions

1. SAPPE: New Strategic Partner Drive 2019 Earning Growth

We cut our target price by 22% to Bt24.7 to factor in  disappointing 2018 result. However, we maintain our BUY rating on the back of positive outlook toward its new products and market expansion plan.

The story:

• Posted net profit of Bt50m in 4Q18, down 36%YoY and 25%QoQ
• Trimmed 2019-21E forecast by 23.8%-24.3% respectively
• Expanding strategic partnership
• Our new target price of Bt24.7 is based on a target PE’19E of 18.8x which is equivalent to the World’s consumer staples sector.

Risks:  (1) Fluctuations in raw material prices

             (2) Exchange rate fluctuations

             (3) Highly competitive industry

2. Donki (7532 JP) Becomes Japan’s 4th Biggest Retailer

Pan Pacific International (7532 JP) (Don Quijote) is on a roll at the moment.

The discount and variety retailer just opened its fourth store in South-East Asia, mixing Japanese restaurants and cafes with a Donki store and a range of Japanese speciality tenants. The store has all the high-level retail entertainment that its Japanese stores offer but with the added cachet of being from Japan and mixing in a lot more in-mall tenants and food outlets. PPI now plans 200 overseas stores in the medium-term.

Back home, PPI is creating new small store formats which have the potential to reach into parts of Japan its big box stores cannot.

At the same time, PPI is beginning the conversion of 100 Uny stores to mixed food and variety stores. With the first six conversions showing sales growth of 83% over 10 months and gross margins up 59%, PPI’s expectation of an extra ¥20 billion in operating profit once conversions are complete looks very achievable.

The takeover means PPI is now Japan’s fourth-biggest retailer, up from 15th just three years ago.

These multiple ventures reflect the company’s flexibility, adapting to each local market’s needs with formats to match.

Its recent decision to close down its e-commerce business is not a weakness but a positive move, demonstrating that PPI understands where its strengths lie: in live store entertainment.

3. Postcard from Surat (India)

With our Post Card Series, our aim is to bring on-ground realities & perspectives from cities across India.  In this insight, we share our takeaways from our visit to Surat, the diamond hub of India. Our focus is Titan Co Ltd (TTAN IN) and the impact on margins. 

Studded jewellery has more margins than plain gold jewellery. Part of Titan’s plan is to improve the mix in favour of studded jewellery which could help it command even higher margins. Titan anticipates this mix to improve to 50% by FY2023. Our interactions indicate a limited possibility of this change in mix. Operating leverage may be the only driver that can help in margin expansion.

We revise our FY20 EBIT margin & EPS estimates. Our FY20 EBIT margin is revised from 12.63% to 11.6% for FY20, continues to be higher than consensus which is at 10.82%. While we see limited margin expansion possibility, revenue growth likely to surprise. We introduce our FY21 EPS estimate at INR 28.75 compared to consensus EPS which is at INR 25.50.

Trust is a factor which cannot be easily replicated or acquired. The trust that Titan enjoys argues for a higher PE multiple. Based on a two-year average forward multiple 51x, our target price for Titan is INR 1466 which represents an upside of 37% from the last close price of INR 1070

4. TRADE IDEA – Hang Lung (10 HK) Stub: A Timeless Arb

An old favorite in the Asian arbitrageur’s investment universe is the Hang Lung stub. The Hang Lung Group acquired Hang Lung Properties (formerly named Amoy Properties) and designated the subsidiary as its property investment arm.  After both companies were listed in 1992, the same year that the company entered the mainland with its purchase of the Grand Gateway 66 and Plaza 66 in Shanghai, the pair was open to arbs. The Hang Lung Group now controls over RMB 130 (USD 19.4b) billion of property in Hong Kong and China. 

In the wonderful world of Asian holding companies, Hang Lung needs little introduction. However, in this insight I would like to highlight a trade idea. I will detail why I think now is the right time to setup a stub trade and some background information on the company and what assets constitute the stub. 

In this insight I will cover:

I. The Trade

II. The Stub Assets

III. My Track Record with Stub Trades

5. Company Visits: Berli Jucker, M Visions

We visited one big-cap stock, Berli Jucker, and one pip-squeak recent IPO M Vision today. A couple of highlights:

• Slow revenue growth at BJC at under 5% largely driven by Big C (hypermarket), but earnings growth was strong at 28% mainly due to lower cost of palm oil in the snack business.
• Good progress in Vietnam with expansion of the bottle capacity this year and SABECO increasing purchases of bottles.
• Overall unimpressed. The company isn’t expecting to grow revenues more than 9% this year, and many of the cost cuts we saw in 2018 are clearly one-offs. Higher oil prices are likely to lead to rising palm oil prices this year too, since the two commodities are linked through substitution effect.
• MVP underwent a bad year on the profit level, but their various businesses, at least on the top line level, looks like it could recover quickly this year.

In this briefing:

1. Isetan-Mitsukoshi Unveils Digital Strategy
2. Tesla  – Now We Know The Y, But Not the How
3. Indonesia Property – In Search of the End of the Rainbow – Part 4 – Alam Sutera Realty (ASRI IJ)
4. Koolearn (新东方在线) IPO Review – Yet to See Results from Increased Spending
5. Yahoo Japan Company Visit: Profit Erosion Has Bottomed and Mobile Payments (PayPay) Starts Strong

1. Isetan-Mitsukoshi Unveils Digital Strategy

Three years ago, Isetan-Mitsukoshi attempted to reverse a strategy of shifting to small format retailing.

At the same time, the department store operator made a final ditch effort to avoid closing department stores and sacked its CEO who had had the temerity to suggest closure was the only way to revive the business.

Last year new management finally realised the old CEO had been right and that culling stores was the only way to improve profit growth.

Now the company is diversifying again but, instead of just small stores, it is planning a big investment into e-commerce with a projected ¥145 billion in sales from personal styling alone.

2. Tesla  – Now We Know The Y, But Not the How

Tesla Motors (TSLA US) unveiled Model Y on, perhaps not coincidentally, March 14th which also is Pi Day. Pi is the fundamental ratio which demonstrates that all circles are related–as Model Y is overwhelmingly related with the seminal Model 3 which contributes 75-80% of the newcomer’s platform and technology.

Which means Model Y may be originating with Model 3’s many inherent problems, as I discussed in Tesla’s Plan B 2.0; Y Not, just as Tesla also is juggling the ramp-up of the newly launched $35,000-base model of Model 3 along with sales expansion into Europe and China as well as building a new plant on a shoestring in Shanghai. All this just as the company also has lurched into a radical new online-only sales model with apparently little if any considered preparation (see Tesla’s New Plan: Buy Before You Try).

No wonder Tesla’s Vice President of Engineering Michael Schwekutsch just quit, an ominous signal.

Another is that Model Y won’t be available until late 2020–at best–which is much later than expected. It’s still not clear when or where Model Y will be in full production or, even more critical, when Tesla will make even a penny of profit on it. Model 3 only recently became marginally profitable, excluding the likely money-losing $35k version, and sales of more profitable but aging Models S and X are in accelerating decline.

And, as I observed last week, Tesla’s track record of long delays in delivering new models coupled with Model 3’s alarming quality and reliability may seriously diminish the hoped-for early bird reservation cash which the company sorely needs to ease its liquidity crunch. At the same time, the pending arrival of Model Y over the next year or so is likely to further dampen already waning demand for Model 3.

In any case, it’s too late for Tesla to preserve profitability in the calamitous first quarter, if not for the full year.

Continue reading for Bond Angle analysis.

3. Indonesia Property – In Search of the End of the Rainbow – Part 4 – Alam Sutera Realty (ASRI IJ)

In this series under Smartkarma Originals, CrossASEAN insight providers AngusMackintosh and Jessica Irene seek to determine whether or not we are close to the end of the rainbow and to a period of outperformance for the property sector. Our end conclusions will be based on a series of company visits to the major listed property companies in Indonesia, conversations with local banks, property agents, and other relevant channel checks. 

The fourth company that we explore is township developer Alam Sutera Realty (ASRI IJ), which provides an interesting exposure to a mix of landed housing, high-rise and low-rise condominiums through its Alam Sutera Township near Serpong and its Pasir Kemis township 15 km further out on the toll road. 

Given the diminishing area of high-value land bank in Alam Sutera, the company has shifted emphasis towards selling low-rise condominiums and commercial lots for shop houses, which has been a success story. 

Alam Sutera Realty (ASRI IJ) also has a contract with a Chinese developer, China Fortune Land Development (CFLD), to develop a total of 500 ha over a five year period in its Pasir Kamis Township.  This has provided a fillip for the company during a quiet period of marketing sales and will continue to underpin earnings for the next 2 years.

The company stands to benefit from the completion of two new toll-roads, one soon to be completed to the south connecting directly to BSD City and longer term a new toll to Soekarno Hatta Airport to the north.

It will start to utilise new land bank in North Serpong in 2021, which will extend the development potential in the area significantly longer-term. 

Management is optimistic about marketing sales for 2019 and expects growth of +16% versus last year’s number, which already exceeded expectations.

Alam Sutera Realty (ASRI IJ) has less recurrent income than peers at around 10% of total revenue but has the potential to see better contributions from the Garuda Wisnu Kencana Cultural Centre (GWK) in Bali. 

The new regulations on the booking of sales financed by mortgages introduced in August 2018 will benefit Alam Sutera Realty (ASRI IJ) from a cash flow perspective. Given that the company is consistently producing free cash flow, this is also a strong deleveraging story.

One of the biggest risks for the company is its US$ debt, which totals US$480m and is made up of two bonds expiring in 2020 and 2022. 

From a valuation perspective, Alam Sutera Realty (ASRI IJ) looks very interesting, trading on 4.9x FY19E PER, at 0.67x PBV, and at a 71% discount to NAV. On all three measures, at 1 STD below its historical mean. Our target price of IDR600 takes a blended approach, based on the company trading at historical mean on all three measures implies upside of 91% from current levels. Catalysts include better marketing sales from its low-rise developments at its Alam Sutera township and further cluster sales there, a pick-up in sales and pricing at its Pasir Kemis township, a sale of its office inventory at The Tower, a pick up in recurrent income driven by improving tenant mix at GWK. Given that the company has high levels of US$ debt, a stable currency will also benefit the company. A more dovish outlook on interest rates will also be a positive, given a large and rising portion of buyers use a mortgage to buy its properties. 

4. Koolearn (新东方在线) IPO Review – Yet to See Results from Increased Spending

Koolearn (1797 HK) is looking to raise up to US$S234m in its upcoming IPO.  We have previously covered the company in:

• Koolearn (新东方在线) Pre-IPO – Profitable Online Edu Company but Poor Sentiment Weighs
• New Regulatory Tightening on Online Education Reads Badly on Koolearn IPO

In this insight, we will look at the updates on financials and operating metrics, compare it to other listed online education companies, and run the deal through our framework.

The increase in spending on marketing has not yielded the intended results as the growth rates of student enrollment and gross billings slowing down. Furthermore, aggressive spending behavior is similar to that of STG and LAIX and both companies did not perform well post listing.

5. Yahoo Japan Company Visit: Profit Erosion Has Bottomed and Mobile Payments (PayPay) Starts Strong

We recently met with Yahoo Japan (4689 JP)  for an update on the company after Q3 results. We thought the financial announcement was positive with encouraging forecasts for profitability, both this year and going forward, and revenue growth potential. In addition, Yahoo Japan reported solid customer growth for mobile payments joint venture PayPay, driven by strong marketing support and an attractive proposition for offline merchants.  We think the latter is very important for the development of mobile payments in Japan and PayPay has had a robust start.

In this briefing:

1. Indonesia Property – In Search of the End of the Rainbow – Part 4 – Alam Sutera Realty (ASRI IJ)
2. Koolearn (新东方在线) IPO Review – Yet to See Results from Increased Spending
3. Yahoo Japan Company Visit: Profit Erosion Has Bottomed and Mobile Payments (PayPay) Starts Strong
4. SAPPE: New Strategic Partner Drive 2019 Earning Growth
5. Donki (7532 JP) Becomes Japan’s 4th Biggest Retailer

1. Indonesia Property – In Search of the End of the Rainbow – Part 4 – Alam Sutera Realty (ASRI IJ)

In this series under Smartkarma Originals, CrossASEAN insight providers AngusMackintosh and Jessica Irene seek to determine whether or not we are close to the end of the rainbow and to a period of outperformance for the property sector. Our end conclusions will be based on a series of company visits to the major listed property companies in Indonesia, conversations with local banks, property agents, and other relevant channel checks. 

The fourth company that we explore is township developer Alam Sutera Realty (ASRI IJ), which provides an interesting exposure to a mix of landed housing, high-rise and low-rise condominiums through its Alam Sutera Township near Serpong and its Pasir Kemis township 15 km further out on the toll road. 

Given the diminishing area of high-value land bank in Alam Sutera, the company has shifted emphasis towards selling low-rise condominiums and commercial lots for shop houses, which has been a success story. 

Alam Sutera Realty (ASRI IJ) also has a contract with a Chinese developer, China Fortune Land Development (CFLD), to develop a total of 500 ha over a five year period in its Pasir Kamis Township.  This has provided a fillip for the company during a quiet period of marketing sales and will continue to underpin earnings for the next 2 years.

The company stands to benefit from the completion of two new toll-roads, one soon to be completed to the south connecting directly to BSD City and longer term a new toll to Soekarno Hatta Airport to the north.

It will start to utilise new land bank in North Serpong in 2021, which will extend the development potential in the area significantly longer-term. 

Management is optimistic about marketing sales for 2019 and expects growth of +16% versus last year’s number, which already exceeded expectations.

Alam Sutera Realty (ASRI IJ) has less recurrent income than peers at around 10% of total revenue but has the potential to see better contributions from the Garuda Wisnu Kencana Cultural Centre (GWK) in Bali. 

The new regulations on the booking of sales financed by mortgages introduced in August 2018 will benefit Alam Sutera Realty (ASRI IJ) from a cash flow perspective. Given that the company is consistently producing free cash flow, this is also a strong deleveraging story.

One of the biggest risks for the company is its US$ debt, which totals US$480m and is made up of two bonds expiring in 2020 and 2022. 

From a valuation perspective, Alam Sutera Realty (ASRI IJ) looks very interesting, trading on 4.9x FY19E PER, at 0.67x PBV, and at a 71% discount to NAV. On all three measures, at 1 STD below its historical mean. Our target price of IDR600 takes a blended approach, based on the company trading at historical mean on all three measures implies upside of 91% from current levels. Catalysts include better marketing sales from its low-rise developments at its Alam Sutera township and further cluster sales there, a pick-up in sales and pricing at its Pasir Kemis township, a sale of its office inventory at The Tower, a pick up in recurrent income driven by improving tenant mix at GWK. Given that the company has high levels of US$ debt, a stable currency will also benefit the company. A more dovish outlook on interest rates will also be a positive, given a large and rising portion of buyers use a mortgage to buy its properties. 

2. Koolearn (新东方在线) IPO Review – Yet to See Results from Increased Spending

Koolearn (1797 HK) is looking to raise up to US$S234m in its upcoming IPO.  We have previously covered the company in:

• Koolearn (新东方在线) Pre-IPO – Profitable Online Edu Company but Poor Sentiment Weighs
• New Regulatory Tightening on Online Education Reads Badly on Koolearn IPO

In this insight, we will look at the updates on financials and operating metrics, compare it to other listed online education companies, and run the deal through our framework.

The increase in spending on marketing has not yielded the intended results as the growth rates of student enrollment and gross billings slowing down. Furthermore, aggressive spending behavior is similar to that of STG and LAIX and both companies did not perform well post listing.

3. Yahoo Japan Company Visit: Profit Erosion Has Bottomed and Mobile Payments (PayPay) Starts Strong

We recently met with Yahoo Japan (4689 JP)  for an update on the company after Q3 results. We thought the financial announcement was positive with encouraging forecasts for profitability, both this year and going forward, and revenue growth potential. In addition, Yahoo Japan reported solid customer growth for mobile payments joint venture PayPay, driven by strong marketing support and an attractive proposition for offline merchants.  We think the latter is very important for the development of mobile payments in Japan and PayPay has had a robust start.

4. SAPPE: New Strategic Partner Drive 2019 Earning Growth

We cut our target price by 22% to Bt24.7 to factor in  disappointing 2018 result. However, we maintain our BUY rating on the back of positive outlook toward its new products and market expansion plan.

The story:

• Posted net profit of Bt50m in 4Q18, down 36%YoY and 25%QoQ
• Trimmed 2019-21E forecast by 23.8%-24.3% respectively
• Expanding strategic partnership
• Our new target price of Bt24.7 is based on a target PE’19E of 18.8x which is equivalent to the World’s consumer staples sector.

Risks:  (1) Fluctuations in raw material prices

             (2) Exchange rate fluctuations

             (3) Highly competitive industry

5. Donki (7532 JP) Becomes Japan’s 4th Biggest Retailer

Pan Pacific International (7532 JP) (Don Quijote) is on a roll at the moment.

The discount and variety retailer just opened its fourth store in South-East Asia, mixing Japanese restaurants and cafes with a Donki store and a range of Japanese speciality tenants. The store has all the high-level retail entertainment that its Japanese stores offer but with the added cachet of being from Japan and mixing in a lot more in-mall tenants and food outlets. PPI now plans 200 overseas stores in the medium-term.

Back home, PPI is creating new small store formats which have the potential to reach into parts of Japan its big box stores cannot.

At the same time, PPI is beginning the conversion of 100 Uny stores to mixed food and variety stores. With the first six conversions showing sales growth of 83% over 10 months and gross margins up 59%, PPI’s expectation of an extra ¥20 billion in operating profit once conversions are complete looks very achievable.

The takeover means PPI is now Japan’s fourth-biggest retailer, up from 15th just three years ago.

These multiple ventures reflect the company’s flexibility, adapting to each local market’s needs with formats to match.

Its recent decision to close down its e-commerce business is not a weakness but a positive move, demonstrating that PPI understands where its strengths lie: in live store entertainment.

In this briefing:

1. Koolearn (新东方在线) IPO Review – Yet to See Results from Increased Spending
2. Yahoo Japan Company Visit: Profit Erosion Has Bottomed and Mobile Payments (PayPay) Starts Strong
3. SAPPE: New Strategic Partner Drive 2019 Earning Growth
4. Donki (7532 JP) Becomes Japan’s 4th Biggest Retailer
5. Postcard from Surat (India)

1. Koolearn (新东方在线) IPO Review – Yet to See Results from Increased Spending

Koolearn (1797 HK) is looking to raise up to US$S234m in its upcoming IPO.  We have previously covered the company in:

• Koolearn (新东方在线) Pre-IPO – Profitable Online Edu Company but Poor Sentiment Weighs
• New Regulatory Tightening on Online Education Reads Badly on Koolearn IPO

In this insight, we will look at the updates on financials and operating metrics, compare it to other listed online education companies, and run the deal through our framework.

The increase in spending on marketing has not yielded the intended results as the growth rates of student enrollment and gross billings slowing down. Furthermore, aggressive spending behavior is similar to that of STG and LAIX and both companies did not perform well post listing.

2. Yahoo Japan Company Visit: Profit Erosion Has Bottomed and Mobile Payments (PayPay) Starts Strong

We recently met with Yahoo Japan (4689 JP)  for an update on the company after Q3 results. We thought the financial announcement was positive with encouraging forecasts for profitability, both this year and going forward, and revenue growth potential. In addition, Yahoo Japan reported solid customer growth for mobile payments joint venture PayPay, driven by strong marketing support and an attractive proposition for offline merchants.  We think the latter is very important for the development of mobile payments in Japan and PayPay has had a robust start.

3. SAPPE: New Strategic Partner Drive 2019 Earning Growth

We cut our target price by 22% to Bt24.7 to factor in  disappointing 2018 result. However, we maintain our BUY rating on the back of positive outlook toward its new products and market expansion plan.

The story:

• Posted net profit of Bt50m in 4Q18, down 36%YoY and 25%QoQ
• Trimmed 2019-21E forecast by 23.8%-24.3% respectively
• Expanding strategic partnership
• Our new target price of Bt24.7 is based on a target PE’19E of 18.8x which is equivalent to the World’s consumer staples sector.

Risks:  (1) Fluctuations in raw material prices

             (2) Exchange rate fluctuations

             (3) Highly competitive industry

4. Donki (7532 JP) Becomes Japan’s 4th Biggest Retailer

Pan Pacific International (7532 JP) (Don Quijote) is on a roll at the moment.

The discount and variety retailer just opened its fourth store in South-East Asia, mixing Japanese restaurants and cafes with a Donki store and a range of Japanese speciality tenants. The store has all the high-level retail entertainment that its Japanese stores offer but with the added cachet of being from Japan and mixing in a lot more in-mall tenants and food outlets. PPI now plans 200 overseas stores in the medium-term.

Back home, PPI is creating new small store formats which have the potential to reach into parts of Japan its big box stores cannot.

At the same time, PPI is beginning the conversion of 100 Uny stores to mixed food and variety stores. With the first six conversions showing sales growth of 83% over 10 months and gross margins up 59%, PPI’s expectation of an extra ¥20 billion in operating profit once conversions are complete looks very achievable.

The takeover means PPI is now Japan’s fourth-biggest retailer, up from 15th just three years ago.

These multiple ventures reflect the company’s flexibility, adapting to each local market’s needs with formats to match.

Its recent decision to close down its e-commerce business is not a weakness but a positive move, demonstrating that PPI understands where its strengths lie: in live store entertainment.

5. Postcard from Surat (India)

With our Post Card Series, our aim is to bring on-ground realities & perspectives from cities across India.  In this insight, we share our takeaways from our visit to Surat, the diamond hub of India. Our focus is Titan Co Ltd (TTAN IN) and the impact on margins. 

Studded jewellery has more margins than plain gold jewellery. Part of Titan’s plan is to improve the mix in favour of studded jewellery which could help it command even higher margins. Titan anticipates this mix to improve to 50% by FY2023. Our interactions indicate a limited possibility of this change in mix. Operating leverage may be the only driver that can help in margin expansion.

We revise our FY20 EBIT margin & EPS estimates. Our FY20 EBIT margin is revised from 12.63% to 11.6% for FY20, continues to be higher than consensus which is at 10.82%. While we see limited margin expansion possibility, revenue growth likely to surprise. We introduce our FY21 EPS estimate at INR 28.75 compared to consensus EPS which is at INR 25.50.

Trust is a factor which cannot be easily replicated or acquired. The trust that Titan enjoys argues for a higher PE multiple. Based on a two-year average forward multiple 51x, our target price for Titan is INR 1466 which represents an upside of 37% from the last close price of INR 1070