China

In this briefing:

1. Weimob IPO: Prospectus Point to Mixed Fundamentals
2. Last Week in Event SPACE: Harbin Electric, MYOB, TMB Bank, Halla Holdings

1. Weimob IPO: Prospectus Point to Mixed Fundamentals

Weimob.com (1260480D CH) is a combination of a SaaS software and an adtech (targeted marketing) business. It is backed by Tencent Holdings (700 HK), which is 3% shareholder and its largest customer. Weimob has started book building to raise gross proceeds of $108-135 million. Cornerstone investors which include a close associate of Tencent and Huifu Payment Limited (1806 HK) have agreed to purchase $42 million worth of shares in the offering.

2. Last Week in Event SPACE: Harbin Electric, MYOB, TMB Bank, Halla Holdings

Last Week in Event SPACE …

• Just how will Harbin Electric Co Ltd H (1133 HK)‘s independent directors justify recommending an Offer to shareholders at a price which gave cash less cavalier than cash?
• MYOB Group Ltd (MYO AU)‘s directors grudgingly yet understandably enter an agreed deal with KKR.
• A TMB Bank PCL (TMB TB) / Thanachart Capital (TCAP TB) courtship is a possibility after an earlier Krung Thai Bank Pub (KTB TB) /TMB alliance failed. 

(This insight covers specific insights & comments involving Stubs, Pairs, Arbitrage, share Classification and Events – or SPACE – in the past week)

As previously discussed in Harbin Electric Expected To Be Privatised, Harbin Electric (HE) has now announced a privatisation Offer from parent and 60.41%-shareholder Harbin Electric Corporation (“HEC”) by way of a merger by absorption. The Offer price of $4.56/share, an 82.4% premium to last close, is bang in line with that paid by HEC in January this year for new domestic shares. The Offer price has been declared final. 

• Of note, the Offer price is a 37% discount to HE’s net cash of $7.27/share as at 30 June 2018. Should the privatisation be successful, this Offer will cost HEC ~HK$3.08bn, following which it can pocket the remaining net cash of $9.3bn PLUS the power generation equipment manufacturer business thrown in for free.
• On pricing, “fair” to me would be something like the distribution of net cash to zero then taking over the company on a PER with respect to peers. That is not happening. It will be difficult to see how independent directors (and the IFA) can justify recommending an Offer to shareholders at any price below the net cash/share, especially when the underlying business is profit-generating.
• Dissension rights are available, however, there is no administrative guidance on the substantive as well as procedural rules as to how the “fair price” will be determined under PRC and HK Law.
• Trading at a gross/annualised spread of 15%/28% assuming end-July completion, based on the average timeline for merger by absorption precedents. As HEC is only waiting for approval from independent H-shareholders suggests this transaction may complete earlier than precedents. 

(link to my insight: Harbin Electric: The Price Is Not Right)  

KKR and MYOB entered into Scheme Implementation Agreement (SIA) at $3.40/share, valuing MYOB, on a market cap basis, at A$2bn. MYOB’s board unanimously recommends shareholders to vote in favour of the Offer, in the absence of a superior proposal. The Offer price assumes no full-year dividend is paid.

• On balance, MYOB’s board has made the right decision to accept KKR’s reduced Offer. The argument that MYOB is a “known turnaround story” is challenged as cloud-based accounting software providers Xero Ltd (XRO AU)  and Intuit Inc (INTU US) grab market share. This is also reflected in MYOB’s forecast 7% revenue growth in FY18 and follows a 10% decline in first-half profit, despite a 61% jump in online subscribers.
• And there is justification for KKR’s lowering the Offer price: the ASX is down 10% since KKR’s initial tilt, the ASX technology index is off by ~14%, a basket of listed Aussie peers are down 17%, while Xero, the most comparable peer, is down ~20%. The Scheme Offer is at a ~27% premium to the estimated adjusted (for the ASX index) downside price of $2.68/share.

• Bain was okay selling at $3.15/share to KKR and will be fine selling its remaining ~6.5% stake at $3.40. Presumably, MYOB sounded out the other major shareholders such as Fidelity, Yarra Funds Management, Vanguard etc as to their read on the revised $3.40 offer, before agreeing to the SIA with KKR.

• If the markets avoid further declines, this deal will probably get up. If the markets rebound, the outcome is less assured. This Tuesday marks the beginning of a new year and a renewed mandate for investors to take risk, especially an agreed deal; but the current 5.3% annualised spread is tight.

(link to my insight: MYOB Caves And Agrees To KKR’s Reduced Offer)

TMB Bank PCL (TMB TB) (Mkt Cap: $1.2bn; Liquidity: $7mn)

The Ministry of Finance, the major shareholder of TMB, confirmed that both Krung Thai Bank Pub (KTB TB) and Thanachart Capital (TCAP TB) had engaged in merger talks with TMB. Considering an earlier KTB/TMB courtship failed, it is more likely, but by no means guaranteed, that the deal with Thanachart will happen. Bloomberg is also reporting that Thanachart and TMB want to do a deal before the next elections, which is less than two months away.

• TMB is much bigger than Thanachart and therefore it may boil down to whether TMB wants to be the target or acquirer. In Athaporn Arayasantiparb, CFA‘s view, a deal with Thanachart would leave TMB as the acquirer rather than the target. But Thanachart’s management has a better track record than TMB.
• Both banks have undergone extensive deals before this one: 1) TMB acquired DBS Thai Danu and IFCT; and 2) Thanachart engineered an acquisition of the much bigger, but struggling, SCIB.
• A merger between the two would still leave them smaller than Bank Of Ayudhya (BAY TB) and would not change the bank rankings; but it would give TMB a bigger presence in asset management, hire-purchase finance and a re-entry into the securities business.

(link to Athaporn’s insight: Sathorn Series M: TMB-Thanachart Courtship)  

Halla Holdings (060980 KS) / Mando Corp (204320 KS)

Mando accounts for 45% of Halla’s NAV, which is currently trading at a 50% discount. Sanghyun Park believes the recent narrowing in the discount may be due to the hype attached to Mando-Hella Elec, which he believes is overdone; and recommends a short Holdco and long Mando. Using Sanghyun’s figures, I see the discount to NAV at 51%, 2STD above the 12-month average of ~47%.

(link to Sanghyun’s insight: Halla Holdings Stub Trade: Downwardly Mean Reversion in Favor of Mando)  

• LG Chem Ltd (051910 KS)‘s 1P is now at a 44.20% discount to Common. The dividend will be the same as last year of ₩6,000 despite lower earnings. The dividend yield for Common will be 1.68%, and 3.03% for 1P or a dividend yield difference of 1.35%, a four-year high. (link to Sanghyun’s insight: LG Chem Share Class: Another Pref to Watch as Div Yield Gap at 4Y High)  

• Glow Energy Pcl (GLOW TB). In a strange twist to the tale, the ERC agrees to approve Global Power Synergy Company Ltd (GPSC TB)‘s takeover of Glow under a revised plan in which they have to: 1) sell Glow SPP1, a power plant with 124MW capacity and 90 tons/hr of steam; and 2) allow clients such as Pa Daeng to change providers. This will reduce Glow’s market share within the MapTaPhut area, but Athaporn Arayasantiparb, CFA thinks the purchase price (Bt139bn according to Bangkok Post) will have to be revised downwards too.  For more on the original deal, see Deal Alert! GPSC Goes For the Jugular! and Anti-Trust Should Be A Non-Issue In The GPSC/Glow Deal.

• Unisem (M) (UNI MK). The Offer is now unconditional and will remain open to acceptances until the 7 January 2019.
• Stanmore Coal (SMR AU). The offer has been extended until the 22 January 2019.

Often these moves can easily be explained – the placement of new shares, rights issue, movements subsequent to a takeover, amongst others. For those mentioned below, I could not find an obvious reason for the CCASS move.   

In this briefing:

1. Asian Credit Monitor: 2019 Portfolio Strategy, US Rate Trajectory, China Reform Pause
2. Weekly Oil Views: Crude Remains at the Mercy of Fickle Financial Markets
3. Healius And The (Likely) First Salvo
4. Big Banks – A Crisis of Investor Confidence
5. Chinese Market Sentiment at a Crossroad

1. Asian Credit Monitor: 2019 Portfolio Strategy, US Rate Trajectory, China Reform Pause

If we had to make a base observation for Asia credit markets over 2018, it was certainly caught “wrong-footed” like most of its other risky asset counterparts. The combination of a more hawkish Fed in 2018, global quantitative tightening, late-cycle economic conditions, volatility and a strong USD have all served to impact almost all the asset classes negatively. According to some asset allocators, the only asset class which returned positive in 2018 was cash, every other traditional asset class saw losses.

USD direction will further dictate the impact on overall Asian risk, in our view, with many undervalued Asian currencies following their sharp declines in 2018. One of our scenarios includes a range-bound USD in 1H19, followed by a possible reversal in 2H19 on any dovish Fed policy/US economic weakness. In this case, it has the potential to attract incremental portfolio inflows back into Asian risk. We expect a slightly tighter bias in monetary policy in most Asia ex-Japan nations which is supportive for their respective currencies.

In 2019, risk-reward dynamics have improved particularly for Asian investment grade (“IG”) where we see more limited MTM pressure. We expect a more defensive market at least in 1H19 which supports our heavier IG bias. We suspect larger investors would continue to reallocate depending on the outcomes of the China-US trade dispute and their view on US risk (arguably near its last late-cycle expansion legs). We continue to be extremely selective in Asian high yield (“HY”) which have been impacted by idiosyncratic situations including credit deterioration and rising defaults. Exogenous factors such as the potential for “fallen angel” risk (i.e. a migration from issuers on the cusp of IG, “BBB-”  into HY) as well as net portfolio outflows from HY, EM and leveraged loan funds are ongoing concerns. Despite cheaper valuations in Asian HY, we still see skewed risk-reward (with larger potential risks).

In the US, our base case expects the Fed to hike 1-2 times (quarter point each) for 2019, premised on still below-trend inflation and external factors. We think it is near the tail-end of its current tightening cycle, but we would continue to monitor the US supply-side (labour markets, employment gaps, prices) for further clues. A sustained upshot to the previous factors may have the potential to prolong the Fed’s tightening cycle.

On China’s side, we have seen a critical reversal in policy towards selective expansion/accommodation again as economic reforms instituted 3 years ago have been reprioritized. China’s difficult task to balance growth targets and restructure its economy is a perennial issue. We would also expect defaults to remain elevated domestically/internationally as a new paradigm of credit investing takes root in China.

Finally, we would like to wish our readers luck in investing and trading in the year ahead.

2. Weekly Oil Views: Crude Remains at the Mercy of Fickle Financial Markets

It has been anything but a happy start to 2019 for the stock markets, which remained under pressure as trading resumed in the new year. A clutch of weak manufacturing data for December – from China to the eurozone and the US – soured the mood for investors through last week. 

That was followed by a rare revenue warning from Apple Inc (AAPL US) , citing slowing sales in China, which drew fresh attention to the vulnerability of American companies from the bitter trade war between the world’s two largest economies. The only assets that seemed to be in favour were the safe havens such as Gold (GOLD COMDTY) and the Japanese yen. 

Beijing provided the first major lift to market sentiment on Friday, by lowering the reserve requirement ratio for Chinese banks, in a bid to inject more cash into the system. US Fed Chairman Jerome Powell signalling a “patient” approach to monetary policy in a panel discussion in Atlanta later in the day and a strong US jobs report for December completed the trinity of factors that closed the week with a rally in stock markets as well as crude. 

Brent and WTI closed nearly 2% higher on the day, just above $57 and just under $48 respectively. Sentiment in the oil market was boosted by initial surveys showing a surprisingly large drop in OPEC production in December.

OPEC/non-OPEC cuts of 1.2 million b/d took effect on January 1 and should yield results in the coming weeks, but we expect crude to remain largely beholden to the twists and turns in the global economy. Just as in the broader financial markets, so in the oil markets, all eyes will now turn to the high-level trade negotiations between the US and China, due to be held in Beijing over January 7-8.  

3. Healius And The (Likely) First Salvo

Healius (HLS AU) (until last month known as Primary Health Care Limited), a leading owner of general practice clinics and pathology centres in Australia, announced an unsolicited and conditional proposal (including DD) from Jangho Group Co Ltd A (601886 CH) at A$3.25/share (~10x FY19 EV/EBITDA) in a A$2.0bn deal.  Jangho currently holds a 15.9% stake in Healius and has been on the shareholder register for two years.

The Offer price translates to a 33.2% premium to the undisturbed price but below the 12-month high of A$4.09 in March 2018. Optically and when referenced to closest peer Sonic Healthcare (SHL AU), the offer price appears light.

Reflecting the long laundry list of conditions attached to this indicative offer, such as securing debt financing and various regulatory approvals in China and Australia, notably data security, this indicative deal is trading wide at a gross/annualized spread of 25%/47%, assuming a deal completion date in early August.

This proposal does, however, indicate Healius was probably oversold.

This morning, Healius’ board rejected the proposal as it was considered opportunistic and fundamentally undervalued the company.

4. Big Banks – A Crisis of Investor Confidence

We analyse the holdings of the world’s largest banks by the 255 global equity funds in our analysis. For each region (America/EMEA/Asia), we have selected the 6 largest banks by total assets, as defined by the S&P Global Market Intelligence Report, 2018.

We find that overall, holdings in these banks are on the decline, and in some cases, investor flight has been acute.  Only 2 of the 18 banks are held overweight by global investors, with Citigroup Inc (C US) and Bnp Paribas (BNP FP) seeing the biggest exodus through 2018.

5. Chinese Market Sentiment at a Crossroad

Chinese equities face a crossroad to start the year as the market mulls a more serious phase in the structural decline in China’s economy balanced against renewed efforts to stimulate growth in 2019.  The US-China trade dispute and broader US policy shift to contain China’s economic ambitions in high tech industries have contributed to fears of a Chinese led global economic downturn.  But these concerns may ease as China and the US progress through trade negotiations restarted amidst a truce on tariff policy through 1-March.  The AUD and copper prices have been highly correlated with Chinese equities over the last year, highlighting the broader market implications of trade talks this week and renewed Chinese efforts to restore economic confidence.

In this briefing:

1. Last Week in Event SPACE: Harbin Electric, MYOB, TMB Bank, Halla Holdings
2. Are US Stocks A Buy Yet?
3. Uber IPO: Its Sprawling Empire And Battle Lines (Part 3)
4. Monthly Geopolitical Comment: Redrafting of Global Map of Political Alliances to Continue in 2019

1. Last Week in Event SPACE: Harbin Electric, MYOB, TMB Bank, Halla Holdings

Last Week in Event SPACE …

• Just how will Harbin Electric Co Ltd H (1133 HK)‘s independent directors justify recommending an Offer to shareholders at a price which gave cash less cavalier than cash?
• MYOB Group Ltd (MYO AU)‘s directors grudgingly yet understandably enter an agreed deal with KKR.
• A TMB Bank PCL (TMB TB) / Thanachart Capital (TCAP TB) courtship is a possibility after an earlier Krung Thai Bank Pub (KTB TB) /TMB alliance failed. 

(This insight covers specific insights & comments involving Stubs, Pairs, Arbitrage, share Classification and Events – or SPACE – in the past week)

As previously discussed in Harbin Electric Expected To Be Privatised, Harbin Electric (HE) has now announced a privatisation Offer from parent and 60.41%-shareholder Harbin Electric Corporation (“HEC”) by way of a merger by absorption. The Offer price of $4.56/share, an 82.4% premium to last close, is bang in line with that paid by HEC in January this year for new domestic shares. The Offer price has been declared final. 

• Of note, the Offer price is a 37% discount to HE’s net cash of $7.27/share as at 30 June 2018. Should the privatisation be successful, this Offer will cost HEC ~HK$3.08bn, following which it can pocket the remaining net cash of $9.3bn PLUS the power generation equipment manufacturer business thrown in for free.
• On pricing, “fair” to me would be something like the distribution of net cash to zero then taking over the company on a PER with respect to peers. That is not happening. It will be difficult to see how independent directors (and the IFA) can justify recommending an Offer to shareholders at any price below the net cash/share, especially when the underlying business is profit-generating.
• Dissension rights are available, however, there is no administrative guidance on the substantive as well as procedural rules as to how the “fair price” will be determined under PRC and HK Law.
• Trading at a gross/annualised spread of 15%/28% assuming end-July completion, based on the average timeline for merger by absorption precedents. As HEC is only waiting for approval from independent H-shareholders suggests this transaction may complete earlier than precedents. 

(link to my insight: Harbin Electric: The Price Is Not Right)  

KKR and MYOB entered into Scheme Implementation Agreement (SIA) at $3.40/share, valuing MYOB, on a market cap basis, at A$2bn. MYOB’s board unanimously recommends shareholders to vote in favour of the Offer, in the absence of a superior proposal. The Offer price assumes no full-year dividend is paid.

• On balance, MYOB’s board has made the right decision to accept KKR’s reduced Offer. The argument that MYOB is a “known turnaround story” is challenged as cloud-based accounting software providers Xero Ltd (XRO AU)  and Intuit Inc (INTU US) grab market share. This is also reflected in MYOB’s forecast 7% revenue growth in FY18 and follows a 10% decline in first-half profit, despite a 61% jump in online subscribers.
• And there is justification for KKR’s lowering the Offer price: the ASX is down 10% since KKR’s initial tilt, the ASX technology index is off by ~14%, a basket of listed Aussie peers are down 17%, while Xero, the most comparable peer, is down ~20%. The Scheme Offer is at a ~27% premium to the estimated adjusted (for the ASX index) downside price of $2.68/share.

• Bain was okay selling at $3.15/share to KKR and will be fine selling its remaining ~6.5% stake at $3.40. Presumably, MYOB sounded out the other major shareholders such as Fidelity, Yarra Funds Management, Vanguard etc as to their read on the revised $3.40 offer, before agreeing to the SIA with KKR.

• If the markets avoid further declines, this deal will probably get up. If the markets rebound, the outcome is less assured. This Tuesday marks the beginning of a new year and a renewed mandate for investors to take risk, especially an agreed deal; but the current 5.3% annualised spread is tight.

(link to my insight: MYOB Caves And Agrees To KKR’s Reduced Offer)

TMB Bank PCL (TMB TB) (Mkt Cap: $1.2bn; Liquidity: $7mn)

The Ministry of Finance, the major shareholder of TMB, confirmed that both Krung Thai Bank Pub (KTB TB) and Thanachart Capital (TCAP TB) had engaged in merger talks with TMB. Considering an earlier KTB/TMB courtship failed, it is more likely, but by no means guaranteed, that the deal with Thanachart will happen. Bloomberg is also reporting that Thanachart and TMB want to do a deal before the next elections, which is less than two months away.

• TMB is much bigger than Thanachart and therefore it may boil down to whether TMB wants to be the target or acquirer. In Athaporn Arayasantiparb, CFA‘s view, a deal with Thanachart would leave TMB as the acquirer rather than the target. But Thanachart’s management has a better track record than TMB.
• Both banks have undergone extensive deals before this one: 1) TMB acquired DBS Thai Danu and IFCT; and 2) Thanachart engineered an acquisition of the much bigger, but struggling, SCIB.
• A merger between the two would still leave them smaller than Bank Of Ayudhya (BAY TB) and would not change the bank rankings; but it would give TMB a bigger presence in asset management, hire-purchase finance and a re-entry into the securities business.

(link to Athaporn’s insight: Sathorn Series M: TMB-Thanachart Courtship)  

Halla Holdings (060980 KS) / Mando Corp (204320 KS)

Mando accounts for 45% of Halla’s NAV, which is currently trading at a 50% discount. Sanghyun Park believes the recent narrowing in the discount may be due to the hype attached to Mando-Hella Elec, which he believes is overdone; and recommends a short Holdco and long Mando. Using Sanghyun’s figures, I see the discount to NAV at 51%, 2STD above the 12-month average of ~47%.

(link to Sanghyun’s insight: Halla Holdings Stub Trade: Downwardly Mean Reversion in Favor of Mando)  

• LG Chem Ltd (051910 KS)‘s 1P is now at a 44.20% discount to Common. The dividend will be the same as last year of ₩6,000 despite lower earnings. The dividend yield for Common will be 1.68%, and 3.03% for 1P or a dividend yield difference of 1.35%, a four-year high. (link to Sanghyun’s insight: LG Chem Share Class: Another Pref to Watch as Div Yield Gap at 4Y High)  

• Glow Energy Pcl (GLOW TB). In a strange twist to the tale, the ERC agrees to approve Global Power Synergy Company Ltd (GPSC TB)‘s takeover of Glow under a revised plan in which they have to: 1) sell Glow SPP1, a power plant with 124MW capacity and 90 tons/hr of steam; and 2) allow clients such as Pa Daeng to change providers. This will reduce Glow’s market share within the MapTaPhut area, but Athaporn Arayasantiparb, CFA thinks the purchase price (Bt139bn according to Bangkok Post) will have to be revised downwards too.  For more on the original deal, see Deal Alert! GPSC Goes For the Jugular! and Anti-Trust Should Be A Non-Issue In The GPSC/Glow Deal.

• Unisem (M) (UNI MK). The Offer is now unconditional and will remain open to acceptances until the 7 January 2019.
• Stanmore Coal (SMR AU). The offer has been extended until the 22 January 2019.

Often these moves can easily be explained – the placement of new shares, rights issue, movements subsequent to a takeover, amongst others. For those mentioned below, I could not find an obvious reason for the CCASS move.   

2. Are US Stocks A Buy Yet?

• 5%-like rallies on Wall Street are signs of a bear market not a bull market
• Bull markets require strong liquidity and low risk appetite, neither yet apply
• Risk appetite readings at minus 12.6 are still above the minus 40 criterion for an upturn
• Recent large fall in risk appetite consistent with upcoming economic recession

3. Uber IPO: Its Sprawling Empire And Battle Lines (Part 3)

Although Uber aims to be an Amazon for transport, we will focus on the ride-hailing market in part 3 of this series. Here, we try to answer the following questions:

1. What are the indicative ride-hailing market shares of Uber vs Lyft in North America?
2. What is Uber’s share in other key countries?
3. What are the lawsuits investors should watch out for?
4. How do Uber’s revenue drivers compare with Lyft’s?
5. What are the timelines and key figures for both companies’ IPOs?

This is the third note in a series about the expected 2019 IPO of global ride-hailing giant Uber Technologies (0084207D US) and Lyft. Please read the earlier two pieces in the series for better contexts:

Uber IPO Preview: Its Sprawling Empire and Battle Lines (Part 1) written by me.

Uber IPO Preview: Fast-Growing Uber Eats Has Become a Material Part of Uber (Part 2) written by Daniel Hellberg

4. Monthly Geopolitical Comment: Redrafting of Global Map of Political Alliances to Continue in 2019

In this briefing:

1. TRACKING TRAFFIC/Chinese Tourism: Visits to Macau & HK Surge
2. Growing Pains & PBoC Cut/US-China Clash/Railways & Airports & Bonds/More Babies Please/Moon Landing
3. Forecasting the Semiconductor Market
4. Gold: Trade Agreement Could Change the Bullish Narrative
5. Chengdu Expressway (成都高速) IPO Review – Well-Managed but Unexciting

1. TRACKING TRAFFIC/Chinese Tourism: Visits to Macau & HK Surge

A year ago we began publishing Tracking Traffic/Chinese Tourism as the hub for all of our research on China’s tourism sector. This monthly report features analysis of Chinese tourism data, notes from our conversations with industry participants, and links to recent company news and thematic pieces. Our aim is to highlight important trends in China’s tourism sector (and changes to those trends).

In this issue readers can find:

Although we remain positive on the long-term growth of Chinese tourism, it’s clear that near-term demand has weakened substantially. We continue to take a negative view of travel intermediaries like Ctrip, which face intensifying competition from many sources. We are more positive on the prospects of actual owners of Chinese travel and tourism assets, like hotel chain Huazhu Group (HTHT US) and Air China Ltd (H) (753 HK). 

2. Growing Pains & PBoC Cut/US-China Clash/Railways & Airports & Bonds/More Babies Please/Moon Landing

China News That Matters

• PBoC responds to disappointing start to another year of slowing growth
• Talks planned but US-China “clash of civilisations” deepens
• Ever faster trains, new airports from Beijing to Antarctica – and more debt
• Two-child policy fails to avert demographic crisis
• Beijing nails first ever landing on moon’s far side

3. Forecasting the Semiconductor Market

This is the time of year that Objective Analysis releases its semiconductor forecast.  This post is based upon a video posted on the WeSRCH website that explains the Objective Analysis 2019 semiconductor forecast.

Although accurate semiconductor forecasts are straightforward to produce, the consistently-accurate methodology spelled out in this Insight is rarely used.

The forecast predicts that the downturn that the industry is currently entering will be longer than most, with profits eluding chip companies until 2022.

4. Gold: Trade Agreement Could Change the Bullish Narrative

INVESTMENT VIEW:
The same macro factors which knocked more than a third off Apple Inc (AAPL US)‘s share price have lifted Gold (GOLD COMDTY) prices by nearly 10% since Sept-18.  However, we believe the market narrative could swiftly reverse if the US and China reach a trade agreement in the coming weeks.  We would look to press our short on Gold…and even go long Apple. 

5. Chengdu Expressway (成都高速) IPO Review – Well-Managed but Unexciting

Chengdu Expressway Company Limited (1785 HK) is looking to raise US$112m in its upcoming IPO. 

The expressways that CEC operate are integral in Chengdu’s transport network. The expressways have been upgraded and expanded consistently over the past three years which has led to an increase in traffic and toll revenue. However, in terms of valuation, CEC will likely trade at a valuation closer to small expressway peers which implies a 10% downside.

In this insight, we will look at the company’s financial and operational performance, toll payment model, and compare its valuation to Hong Kong-listed expressway peers. We will also run the deal through our IPO framework.

In this briefing:

1. Healius (HLS AU): An Unattractive Bid
2. Future Metals Curve in China
3. Weimob IPO Valuation: Optically Cheap
4. Tencent: A Brief Statistical Review of Game Approvals
5. Weimob IPO Quick Take – Less SaaS, More Ads -> Lower Valuation

1. Healius (HLS AU): An Unattractive Bid

Healius (HLS AU), formerly known as Primary Health Care (PRY AU), is a leading Australian owner of GP clinics and pathology centres. On 3 January 2018, Healius received an unsolicited and highly conditional proposal from Jangho Group Co Ltd A (601886 CH) for A$3.25 cash per share.

2. Future Metals Curve in China

Metals are an important part of China’s economic prowess. Specifically, metals are a spoke in the economic wheel with fortunes of commodities and real estate all centered around metals. As we look at metals futures, we see that most metals futures are very flat.

3. Weimob IPO Valuation: Optically Cheap

Weimob.com (1260480D CH) is a combination of a SaaS software and an adtech (targeted marketing) business which has started book building to raise gross proceeds of $108-135 million. According to press reports, Weimob is being viewed favourably by investors as it is being offered at a “cheap” valuation of 18-23x 2019 P/E.

4. Tencent: A Brief Statistical Review of Game Approvals

Paused for eight months, China’s authority resumed the domestic game approval in December. The first batch of 80 games was approved recently.

Since the last round of game application approval, the stock price of Tencent Holdings (700 HK) has fallen by 26%. Stock price reacted positively to the recent progress of game approval. 

In this insight, we try to assess the significance of recent progress with a statistical approach.

5. Weimob IPO Quick Take – Less SaaS, More Ads -> Lower Valuation

Weimob.com (1260480D CH),  a Tencent Holdings (700 HK) and GIC investee company, plans to raise up to US$135m in its Hong Kong IPO.

I’ve covered most aspects of the deal in my earlier insight, Weimob Pre-IPO – Can Be Steamrolled by Tencent, Anytime, where I spoke about the over-reliance on Tencent, high attrition rates and acquisition costs for SMBs, and the increasing contribution of its ads business.

In this insight, I’ll provide an update from the latest filings, comment on valuations and run the deal through our IPO framework.

In this briefing:

1. Weimob IPO Valuation: Optically Cheap
2. Tencent: A Brief Statistical Review of Game Approvals
3. Weimob IPO Quick Take – Less SaaS, More Ads -> Lower Valuation
4. Viva Biotech (维亚生物) IPO: When CRO Becomes Early Stage Biotech Investor
5. Korea M&A Spotlight: Nexon’s Founder Plans to Sell; Will Tencent Buy Nexon?

1. Weimob IPO Valuation: Optically Cheap

Weimob.com (1260480D CH) is a combination of a SaaS software and an adtech (targeted marketing) business which has started book building to raise gross proceeds of $108-135 million. According to press reports, Weimob is being viewed favourably by investors as it is being offered at a “cheap” valuation of 18-23x 2019 P/E.

2. Tencent: A Brief Statistical Review of Game Approvals

Paused for eight months, China’s authority resumed the domestic game approval in December. The first batch of 80 games was approved recently.

Since the last round of game application approval, the stock price of Tencent Holdings (700 HK) has fallen by 26%. Stock price reacted positively to the recent progress of game approval. 

In this insight, we try to assess the significance of recent progress with a statistical approach.

3. Weimob IPO Quick Take – Less SaaS, More Ads -> Lower Valuation

Weimob.com (1260480D CH),  a Tencent Holdings (700 HK) and GIC investee company, plans to raise up to US$135m in its Hong Kong IPO.

I’ve covered most aspects of the deal in my earlier insight, Weimob Pre-IPO – Can Be Steamrolled by Tencent, Anytime, where I spoke about the over-reliance on Tencent, high attrition rates and acquisition costs for SMBs, and the increasing contribution of its ads business.

In this insight, I’ll provide an update from the latest filings, comment on valuations and run the deal through our IPO framework.

4. Viva Biotech (维亚生物) IPO: When CRO Becomes Early Stage Biotech Investor

Viva Biotechnology, a China-based drug discovery company, is seeking to raise USD 200m to list on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. In this insight, we cover the following topics:

• Services provided by Viva. 
• Revenue model of the company.
• The CRO market.
• The company’s history and shareholders.
• Our initial thoughts on valuation.

• WuXi Apptec (药明康德) IPO: This A+H Listing Will Be Different
• Frontage Holding (方达控股) IPO: More Disclosure Needed to Understand Moat and Growth Prospect

5. Korea M&A Spotlight: Nexon’s Founder Plans to Sell; Will Tencent Buy Nexon?

It was reported today that Nexon Co Ltd (3659 JP)’s founder Kim Jung-Joo plans to sell a controlling stake in Nexon’s holding company NXC Corp for at least 10 trillion won ($8.9 billion). Kim Jung-Joo and other related parties plan to sell their entire 98.64% stake in NXC Corp, which owns a 47.98% stake in Nexon. The 10 trillion won or more anticipated acquisition price for NXC Corp would include a significant management premium. Nexon Group’s shareholding structure is basically as follows: Kim Jung-Joo → Nexon (Japan) → Nexon Korea → About 10 affiliates. 

One of the reasons why the Nexon’s founder Kim Jung-Joo, who is only 50 years old, is trying to sell his entire stake in Nexon may have been due to the recent allegations about him giving about $380,000 worth of Nexon stock (prior to its listing) to his old high school classmate (who is now a senior public prosecutor) for free. Kim Jung-Joo has repeatedly faced allegations and attended numerous court hearings on this matter in the past two years. He may have gotten a bit tired from all these allegations. 

Given the enormous size of this acquisition, the two leading Korean game companies including NCsoft Corp (036570 KS) and Netmarble Games (251270 KS) are not likely to purchase Nexon. Rather, the leading contender to buy Nexon right now is likely to be Tencent Holdings (700 HK). The sheer huge size of this deal will represent one of the largest M&A deals in Asia in 2019. 

In this briefing:

1. Forecasting the Semiconductor Market
2. Gold: Trade Agreement Could Change the Bullish Narrative
3. Chengdu Expressway (成都高速) IPO Review – Well-Managed but Unexciting
4. Healius (HLS AU): An Unattractive Bid
5. Future Metals Curve in China

1. Forecasting the Semiconductor Market

This is the time of year that Objective Analysis releases its semiconductor forecast.  This post is based upon a video posted on the WeSRCH website that explains the Objective Analysis 2019 semiconductor forecast.

Although accurate semiconductor forecasts are straightforward to produce, the consistently-accurate methodology spelled out in this Insight is rarely used.

The forecast predicts that the downturn that the industry is currently entering will be longer than most, with profits eluding chip companies until 2022.

2. Gold: Trade Agreement Could Change the Bullish Narrative

INVESTMENT VIEW:
The same macro factors which knocked more than a third off Apple Inc (AAPL US)‘s share price have lifted Gold (GOLD COMDTY) prices by nearly 10% since Sept-18.  However, we believe the market narrative could swiftly reverse if the US and China reach a trade agreement in the coming weeks.  We would look to press our short on Gold…and even go long Apple. 

3. Chengdu Expressway (成都高速) IPO Review – Well-Managed but Unexciting

Chengdu Expressway Company Limited (1785 HK) is looking to raise US$112m in its upcoming IPO. 

The expressways that CEC operate are integral in Chengdu’s transport network. The expressways have been upgraded and expanded consistently over the past three years which has led to an increase in traffic and toll revenue. However, in terms of valuation, CEC will likely trade at a valuation closer to small expressway peers which implies a 10% downside.

In this insight, we will look at the company’s financial and operational performance, toll payment model, and compare its valuation to Hong Kong-listed expressway peers. We will also run the deal through our IPO framework.

4. Healius (HLS AU): An Unattractive Bid

Healius (HLS AU), formerly known as Primary Health Care (PRY AU), is a leading Australian owner of GP clinics and pathology centres. On 3 January 2018, Healius received an unsolicited and highly conditional proposal from Jangho Group Co Ltd A (601886 CH) for A$3.25 cash per share.

5. Future Metals Curve in China

Metals are an important part of China’s economic prowess. Specifically, metals are a spoke in the economic wheel with fortunes of commodities and real estate all centered around metals. As we look at metals futures, we see that most metals futures are very flat.

In this briefing:

1. Uber IPO: Its Sprawling Empire And Battle Lines (Part 3)
2. Monthly Geopolitical Comment: Redrafting of Global Map of Political Alliances to Continue in 2019
3. 58.com Inc. (NYSE: WUBA): Regulatory Pressure Has Long Term Implications
4. Autonomous Driving. Waymo Leading The Charge With Ten Million Miles Driven And Counting
5. Harbin Electric: The Price Is Not Right

1. Uber IPO: Its Sprawling Empire And Battle Lines (Part 3)

Although Uber aims to be an Amazon for transport, we will focus on the ride-hailing market in part 3 of this series. Here, we try to answer the following questions:

1. What are the indicative ride-hailing market shares of Uber vs Lyft in North America?
2. What is Uber’s share in other key countries?
3. What are the lawsuits investors should watch out for?
4. How do Uber’s revenue drivers compare with Lyft’s?
5. What are the timelines and key figures for both companies’ IPOs?

This is the third note in a series about the expected 2019 IPO of global ride-hailing giant Uber Technologies (0084207D US) and Lyft. Please read the earlier two pieces in the series for better contexts:

Uber IPO Preview: Its Sprawling Empire and Battle Lines (Part 1) written by me.

Uber IPO Preview: Fast-Growing Uber Eats Has Become a Material Part of Uber (Part 2) written by Daniel Hellberg

2. Monthly Geopolitical Comment: Redrafting of Global Map of Political Alliances to Continue in 2019

3. 58.com Inc. (NYSE: WUBA): Regulatory Pressure Has Long Term Implications

● We notice that Anjuke’s Oct.-Nov. traffic declined. We attribute this decline to the tightening of registration requirement in various cities, which will reduce the number of housing leads on WUBA platform;

● We, however, believe new home business will deliver strong revenue for WUBA this year, contributing Rmb2bn in revenues by our estimate;

● We rate the stock Buy and cut TP from US$84 to US$79.

4. Autonomous Driving. Waymo Leading The Charge With Ten Million Miles Driven And Counting

Waymo CEO John Krafcik made some bold decisions after taking the helm at Alphabet‘s self-driving project in September 2015. Chief among them was the fact that the company abandon its plans for Level 3 automated driving and focus exclusively on levels 4 & 5. Furthermore, he decreed that Waymo would no longer manufacture its own vehicles but would instead integrate their technology into those of other automakers. Three years later, those decisions would appear to be finally paying off.

On October 10 2018, Waymo reached a significant milestone having completed 10 million self-driving miles across 25 cities in the US. While their first million self-driving miles took 18 months to complete, Waymo now clocks up over a million self-driving miles per month.  The company also recently announced the launch of its robo taxi service in Phoenix, Arizona and looks set to quickly follow suit in California. Plans to extend its self-driving technology beyond robotaxis, most notably for trucks and last-mile transportation solutions are also in the works. Furthermore, the company has begun laying down a framework of innovative B2B revenue models which should help accelerate the speed with which they can eventually monetize their technology.

It hasn’t been smooth sailing all the way for Waymo however. Earlier this year, the company was derided for the driving style of its autonomous vehicles and faced the criticism that its driverless cars continue to have safety drivers. There was also an embarrassing incident where one of those very safety drivers caused the self-driving car he was monitoring to hit a motorcyclist when he attempted to take control of the vehicle. According to Waymo’s own analysis of the vehicle log files, the accident would not have happened had he not intervened. 

With ten million self-driving miles under their belt and a thoughtful, strategic approach to monetizing their technology beginning to emerge, Waymo remains firmly ahead of their peers in leading the autonomous driving charge.  

5. Harbin Electric: The Price Is Not Right

As speculated in Harbin Electric Expected To Be Privatised, Harbin Electric Co Ltd H (1133 HK) has now announced a privatisation Offer from parent and 60.41%-shareholder Harbin Electric Corporation (“HEC”) by way of a merger by absorption. 

The Offer price of $4.56/share, an 82.4% premium to last close, has been declared final. The price corresponds to the subscription of 329mn domestic shares (~47.16% of the existing issued domestic shares and ~24.02% of the existing total issued shares) @$4.56/share by HEC in January this year. 

Of greater significance, the Offer price is a 37% discount to HE’s net cash of $7.27/share as at 30 June 2018. Should the privatisation be successful, this Offer will cost HEC ~HK$3.08bn, following which it can pocket the remaining net cash of $9.3bn PLUS the power generation equipment manufacturer business thrown in for free.

On pricing, “fair” to me would be something like the distribution of net cash to zero then taking over the company on a PER with respect to peers. That is not happening. It will be difficult to see how independent directors can justify recommending an Offer to shareholders at any price which gave cash less cavalier than cash.

Dissension rights are available, however, what constitutes a “fair price” under those rights, and the timing of the settlement under such rights, are not evident. 

As all PRC approvals have been obtained, this transaction may complete earlier than prior mergers by absorption, which have taken 6-8 months from the initial announcement.

In this briefing:

1. Hansoh Pharma (翰森制药) IPO: Takeaways from Recent 4+7 City Centralized Tender Results
2. Sea Ltd: A Surprise Winner in Cut-Throat E-Commerce Battle?
3. Discover SZ/​SH Connect: Foreigners Were Buying Industries and Financials in December
4. Maoyan Entertainment IPO: The Trouble with Blockbusters
5. JD.com (JD): Lawsuit Over, Price Falling Back to First Trading Day, Defensive in Bear Market

1. Hansoh Pharma (翰森制药) IPO: Takeaways from Recent 4+7 City Centralized Tender Results

Hansoh Pharma, a leading generic pharmaceutical manufacturer, filed an application to list on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. In our previous insight, we have covered the company’s core products and pipeline candidates. We also mentioned the recent regulatory development that affects the industry of generic drug manufacturers, in particular, the recent 4+7 City Centralized Tender Results (4+7 城市药品集中采购). 

• Hansoh Pharma (翰森制药) IPO: A Leading Generic Player with Regulatory Overhang (Part 1)
• WuXi Apptec (药明康德) IPO: This A+H Listing Will Be Different

• Frontage Holding (方达控股) IPO: More Disclosure Needed to Understand Moat and Growth Prospect
• Ascentage Pharma (亚盛医药) IPO: Too Early for an IPO
• Junshi Bioscience (君实医药) IPO: Thoughts on Valuation (Part 2)
• Junshi Bioscience (君实医药) IPO: Early in Application but Behind in Key Indications (Part 1)
• CanSino Biologics (康希诺) IPO: Promising Pre-Clinical Results but Vaccine Scandal Weighs (Part 1)

• AOBiome Therapeutics IPO: Hope for Natural Therapeutic Treatment
• Stealth Biotherapeutics IPO: Cure the Symptoms but Not the Cause (Part 1)
• Innovent Biologics (信达生物) IPO: Pricing the PD-1 and Biosimilars Competition (Part 2)
• Innovent Biologics (信达生物) IPO: A Major PD-1 MAb Competitor Might Have Just Emerged (Part 1)
• MicuRx Pharma (盟科医药) IPO: Betting on Single Drug in the Not so Attractive Antibiotic Segment
• Hua Medicine (华领医药) IPO: Thoughts on Valuation
• Hua Medicine (华领医药) IPO: Reviving Roche’s Failed Attempt?
• BeiGene (百济神州) IPO: Dual-Listing with Upside Capped in the Near Term
• Ascletis Pharma (歌礼制药) IPO: Valuation Not Justified by Ganovo and Ravidasvir NPV (Part 3)
• Ascletis Pharma (歌礼制药) IPO: Three Valuation Risk Factors (Part 2)
• Ascletis Pharma (歌礼制药) IPO: Emerging Player in the Crowded HCV Drug Market
• China Isotope & Radiation IPO: Oligopoly, Visible Growth and High Barrier to Entry
• Zai Lab IPO: Thoughts on Valuation, Risks and Upsides (Part 2)
• Zai Lab IPO: Experienced Team, Promising In-Licensing Drug Pipeline (Part 1)

2. Sea Ltd: A Surprise Winner in Cut-Throat E-Commerce Battle?

• A big takeaway from our conversations with Indo e-commerce industry sources is that they vouch for Shopee’s (Sea Ltd’s (SE US) e-commerce arm) MS gains story in the country.
• Indo e-commerce market has been enjoying super growth period (94% CAGR in 2015-18E) despite three major challenges (logistics, payment and highly subsidized market).
• With SE’s fund raising a matter of when, not if (2H20 as most likely timetable), Shopee’s tremendous progress in key metrics (MS, take rate) provides comfort.
• Assuming fair valuation of US$3 bn (vs. US$1.4 bn implied in SE’s ADR price) for Shopee, 12-mo PT for SE works out to be US$15.73/ADR, representing 43% upside potential.  

3. Discover SZ/​SH Connect: Foreigners Were Buying Industries and Financials in December

In our Discover SZ/SH Connect series, we aim to help our investors understand the flow of northbound trades via the Shanghai Connect and Shenzhen Connect, as analyzed by our proprietary data engine. We will discuss the stocks that experienced the most inflow and outflow by offshore investors in the past seven days.

We split the stocks eligible for the northbound trade into three groups: those with a market capitalization of above USD 5 billion, and those with a market capitalization between USD 1 billion and USD 5 billion.

We note that offshore investors were buying industries and financials in December. Interesting stocks in the north bound trades are Han’S Laser Technology In A (002008 CH), Muyuan Foodstuff Co Ltd A (002714 CH) and  Hangzhou Tigermed Consulting (300347 CH) . 

4. Maoyan Entertainment IPO: The Trouble with Blockbusters

Maoyan Entertainment, formerly Entertainment Plus (EPLUS HK), is the largest online movie ticketing service provider in China. According to press reports, Maoyan has started pre-marketing to raise $0.3 billion (down from earlier indication of $0.5-1.0 billion) through a Hong Kong IPO. Maoyan is backed by Beijing Enlight Media (300251 CH) (20.0% shareholder), Tencent Holdings (700 HK) (16.3% shareholder) and Meituan Dianping (3690 HK) (8.6% shareholder).

5. JD.com (JD): Lawsuit Over, Price Falling Back to First Trading Day, Defensive in Bear Market

• Minnesotan Authorities declined to charge the founder of JD.
• JD’s stock price has already plunged 52% in 2018. We believe JD is a defensive equity for portfolios, as the NASDAQ Composite just plunged 50% at most in the financial crisis of 2008.
• Compared to 2014, today’s JD has a higher market share in the larger e-commerce market. However, JD’s stock price is at the same level as the first trading day in 2014.
• JD continued to generate operating cash inflows in 2018 as previous years despite of its zero net margins.
• We are not concerned about the programmer layoff in December, as we believe JD overly invested in “hi-tech” that will not bring revenues in the near future.
• Based on historical Price / GMV, we believe there is an upside of 270% for JD’s stock price.

In this briefing:

1. 2019 Asia Selected Gaming Stock Outlook: Headwinds, Tailwinds and Our Top Picks for Entry Levels Now

1. 2019 Asia Selected Gaming Stock Outlook: Headwinds, Tailwinds and Our Top Picks for Entry Levels Now

Our review of ten Asian gaming companies forward prospects for 2019 yielded our top five picks. Two of those comprise this insight. Three more will follow in Part Two. There is, in our opinion, some disconnect between continuing macro headwinds in both the VIP and mass sectors and a more bullish tone based on a recent upside trend in Macau, strong results in the Philippines and Cambodia. Given the battering of the market in general, the already 8 month old bearish tone to the sector and the current pricing of the two stocks noted here, we see significant upside opportunity as we near the beginning of 2019.