Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
A high-level US delegation will be in Beijing for trade talks in the week of February 11, but Donald Trump rattled the markets on February 7 by saying that he would not be meeting his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping before the March 1 deadline for the two countries to forge a deal or possibly end up escalating their battle.
That forced the financial markets to recalibrate their optimism with regard to the two countries putting all their conflicts behind them soon. Oil swooned along with global equities.
Trump had tweeted at the end of January that a “final deal” would not be made until he and Xi met and thrashed out some of the “long-standing” and “more difficult” issues the US has with Chinese trade practices.
With a comprehensive US-China trade deal in the next few weeks ruled out, and a ratcheting up of US tariffs from March 2 equally inconceivable, we discuss the likely middle-ground scenarios and what they mean for crude price direction.
Overall, though, the oil market could remain in limbo for a while. There are a number of supply risks gathering on the horizon, but those will likely not move center-stage until the economic worries that have gripped investors since the fourth quarter of last year are laid to rest.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
In his 2019 State of the Union address, President Trump said he was seeking “real structural change” to China’s economy:
I have great respect for President Xi, and we are now working on a new trade deal with China. But it must include real, structural change to end unfair trade practices, reduce our chronic trade deficit, and protect American jobs.
In the next breath, he referred to the reboot of NAFTA, which only yielded minor changes:
Another historic trade blunder was the catastrophe known as NAFTA. I have met the men and women of Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Indiana, New Hampshire, and many other states whose dreams were shattered by the signing of NAFTA. For years, politicians promised them they would renegotiate for a better deal, but no one ever tried, until now.
Our new U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement, the USMCA, will replace NAFTA and deliver for American workers like they haven’t had delivered to for a long time. I hope you can pass the USMCA into law so that we can bring back our manufacturing jobs in even greater numbers, expand American agriculture, protect intellectual property, and ensure that more cars are proudly stamped with our four beautiful words: “Made in the USA.
It is said that politics is the art of the possible. Here is where the Art of the Deal meets the art of the possible. Expect either the March 1 deadline to be extended or a deal to be made where both sides commit to further discussions on intellectual property protection and structural reforms.
Everybody wins. The Trump administration demonstrates a mastery of the Art of the Deal. China can temporarily take the tail-risk of additional tariffs and trade war off the table.
We mentioned in our previous note prior to the listing of Maoyan Entertainment on Feb 4th that Chinese New Year (CNY) Box office from the two movies, namely Pegasus and The New King of Comedy that the company invested could be a catalyst post listing. However, our analysis of CNY box office data suggests although Pegasus reported box office revenues slightly north of RMB 1bn, it is far behind the number one movie, The Wandering Earth’s RMB 2bn box office. In addition to the company-specific movie investment, the overall box office for the CNY holiday has been disappointing, suggesting a challenging year for the movie industry in 2019.
When China’s fourth quarter GDP numbers were released in January, predictably, Bloomberg led with “China posts weakest growth since 2009” headline. The fact that the number was still 6.4% YoY, good by almost all standards, was given little attention. Being fickle, we immediately turned to the nominal GDP series – which the media continue to ignore completely – only to find that, on a quarterly annualised basis, the fourth quarter marked an acceleration in growth, from 8.5% annualised in 3Q18 to 9.3% annualised in 4Q18 (YoY it dipped to 9.2% from 9.5% in the third quarter).
Hansoh Pharmaceutical (HANSOH HK) claims to be one of the few R&D driven Chinese pharmaceutical companies. According to press reports, Hansoh aims to launch its Hong Kong IPO to raise $1 billion this month. Over the track record period, Hansoh’s financial performance shows accelerating revenue growth, relatively stable margins and solid cash generation.
Hansoh has the elements of a decent growth story, but our optimism is tempered due to mixed prospects for its drugs. Also, the huge pre-IPO dividend of RMB4.0 billion ($0.6 billion) will likely raise questions on the timing and size of the IPO.
This insight starts with a bit of history. It is entirely extraneous to the data, but I think the history is kind of fun (iron ore, Baltic Dry, and shipping has been a ‘hobby’ of mine for years). If you want to get right to the data, go to the Thin Red Line.
On the 24th of May, 1744, an announcement appeared in TheDaily Post (The Daily Poſt) that the Virginia and Maryland coffee house in Threadneedle Street, London (just east of the Bank of England) had changed its name to Virginia and Baltick Coffee House.
This is to give notice that the House, late the Virginia and Maryland Coffee-house in Threadneedle Street, near the Royal Exchange, is now open’d by the Name of the Virginia & Baltick Coffee-house, where all Foreign and Domestick News are taken in ; and all Letters or Parcels, directed to Merchants or Captains in the Virginia or Baltick Trade will be carefully deliver’d according as directed, and the best Attendance given, by Reynallds and Winboult.
Note, Punch made in any Quantity, in the greatest Perfection, without Adulteration, which is seldom found in any of the most noted Houses ; also Brandy, Rum, and Arrack (neat as imported) are sold in the Vaults under the Coffee-House, at the lowest Prices; where all Customers, we have had the Favour of serving at our late Warehouse in Leadenhall Street, we hope will continue to send their Orders as above.
We have receiv’d Advice, that Several Bags of Letters and Parcels are coming which are directed to be left at the above Coffee-House
This was perhaps because Virginia and Maryland as a name was slightly redundant. Virginia and Maryland are next to each other (if you dropped cargo in Baltimore, you went past Virginia to get there). It was perhaps because trade with Russia and Baltic countries in tallow (from Russia) used to make candles and soap [more candles than soap as Georgian England was still under the idea bathing might invite the plague to enter the pores], flax, hemp (both from modern-day Estonia and Latvia, and Russia), and other goods was fast climbing after The Muscovy Company (originally founded as The Merchant Adventurers to New Lands in 1551 to look for a northeast passage to China) lost its monopoly (enjoyed since 1555) on English trade with Russia in 1698 (though the company’s activities had been somewhat or at times largely curtailed for 50 years after the execution of Charles I of England in 1648).
The Baltic routes were effectively the same as created by the Hanseatic League many hundreds of years before when German traders in the Baltic traded wares down to the Netherlands and even London, from Livonia (Riga and northward) or Livländ as the Hansa states would have called it. And the same products were shipped on that route for almost a thousand years.
In Regency/Georgian England, flax, for example, came from Königsburg (54-55º N at 21º E), then Memel (Dermemel on the map) just up the coast, Libnau a bit further north, Riga just off the map at around 56º N, then Pernel (Latvia), Revel (Estonia), and St Petersburg further to the northeast (further off the map unfortunately). Timber imports grew dramatically after the Great Fire of London, and as imports grew and English shipbuilding increased, timber to build ships (including specifically, masts) was sourced from Norway in the late 1600s then increasingly the East Country (north Europe, Livonia (specifically Memel)) and Russia.
source: Barry Lawrence Ruderman Antique Maps (and the map)
In any case, the new name more accurately represented the business interests of those who congregated there.
The Virginia & Baltick was the place to source North Atlantic and Baltic cargoes, and cargoes rose in volume dramatically from the mid 1700s through the mid 1800s, with a drop only in the early 1810s.
In 1810, the Virginia & Baltick took over the premises of a nearby establishment called the Antwerp Tavern – also on Threadneedle – which was a considerably larger building (in the Hearth Tax (an annual levy of two shillings per annum, to make up the shortfall of ale and beer taxes paid to the sovereign) returns of 1662 it was noted as having 18 hearths). It was renamed the Baltic Coffee House then (it was also periodically the meeting place of the Albion Lodge of Masons).
Long since replaced, as far as I can tell it was located on the SE corner of Threadneedle and the alley behind the Royal Exchange. By 1823, the wild speculations in commodities and the laxity of theretofore informal arrangements on the Second Floor made it imperative for the senior tallow chandlers, soapmakers, and cargo brokers to form a Member’s Club (limited to 300). Rules were established (they are below in the Appendix).
In 1857, the Virginia & Baltick established a company, The Baltic Company Limited, and arrangements were made to take over the lease of the South Sea House (original home to the South Sea Company) at the end of Threadneedle Street. In 1900, the Baltic Exchange was incorporated as a private limited company – the Baltic Mercantile And Shipping Exchange, Limited. and took over the London Shipping Exchange. In 1903, the company established its own purpose-built premises in St. Mary’s Axe. In 1992, an IRA bomb demolished 30 St. Mary’s Axe and a few years later, permanent premises were found at 38 St. Mary’s Axe.
Nota Bene: Before the Great Fire of 1748, the most famous of London’s coffee shops were on the south side of the Royal Exchange – with most in the small area named Exchange Alley and on Birchin, and with Lloyd’s on Lombard Street (corner of Lombard and Abchurch Lane if I remember correctly). The area north and west of the Exchange was oriented towards taverns. The location of the Antwerp Tavern in relation to the map below was roughly where the bolded name of Antwerp Tavern is in the paragraph above.
A map of Coffee Houses Before the Great Fire
In 1985, the Baltic Exchange first calculated its Baltic Freight Index (now the Baltic Dry Index) as an “assessment” of conditions and charter rates amongst a panel of independent ship brokers across nearly two-dozen specific routes (all routes reported have year-round fixtures – not seasonal routes like the Great Lakes) and ship sizes (and since July 1, 2009 is an average of Handysize, Supramax, Panamax, and Capesize Timecharter averages), the data for which is then verified and averaged by the Exchange, and disseminated to members. The route specifics are quite detailed and require “massaging” in order to get normalized data from the specified delivery item (for Capesize Route C2, it is a 180kmt DWT ship on 18.2m SSW draft, max age 10yrs, LOA 290m, beam 45m, TPC 121, 198kcbm grain, 14 knots laden, 15 knots ballast on 62mt fuel oil (380cst) no diesel at sea with the route details as below).
C2: Tubarao to Rotterdam. 160,000lt iron ore, 10% more or less in owner’s option, free in and out. Laydays/cancelling 20/35 days from index date. 6 days, Sundays + holidays included all purposes. 6 hrs turn time at loading port, 6 hrs turn time at discharge port, 0.5% in lieu of weighing. Freight based on long tons. Age max 18 yrs. 3.75% total commission.
There are audits of the brokers, and no shipbrokers are allowed to have “money in the market.” A full index methodology document is available for those who care for it (message me for the PDF).
It’s That Time Of Year, Again.
The Baltic Dry Index (BDIY INDEX) is an indicator published by The Baltic Exchange, in London, first distributed in 1985 and something which gained popularity as a tool for equity investors to “see” the bulk market in the early 2000s.
data: Baltic Exchange, etc
The index has changed somewhat over the years with the current calculation starting in 2009. It is currently calculated as an average of the Capesize, Panamax, Supramax, and Handysize TimeCharter averages, with a slightly complicated weighting system across a variety of routes. An example for Capesize is in the Appendix (below the Rules & Regulations of the Baltic Coffee House of 1823). Most of the routes have a very heavy weighting to Asia. 75% of the weights of Capesize, Panamax, and Supramax have an Asia or Trans-Pacific end of leg to them (Handysize is 50% Asia end, 50% Europe end).
The increased interest on the part of non-freight customers was because the advent of dramatic increases in raw materials imports to China in the early 2000s meant a significant squeeze on ship time. And because there is seasonality to China and its raw materials imports, more seasonality started showing up in the Baltic Dry Index.
Generically, when raw material pricing goes up because raw material demand goes up, bulker rates go up. When raw material pricing goes up because of natural disaster-induced shortages, the effect can be mixed. For example, if for whatever reason iron ore could not be shipped from Australia to China for a period, shipping costs might rise dramatically (if the materials themselves existed to be exported from elsewhere) simply because of greater ship time to export from say Tubarao to China than from Western Australia to China. Right now, the China-based cost to ship a tonne of iron ore from WA to China is less than US$5 while from Tubarao it is $13. If a serious Brazil export drop were to occur, iron ore would go up in price because of the near-term scarcity, but freight prices might not go up that much because the change in time per tonne required to ship would drop (though they might go up on a scarcity of appropriate ships).
In any case, that China seasonality has another very interesting and over-riding characteristic.
And it has to do with Chinese New Year.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
A high-level US delegation will be in Beijing for trade talks in the week of February 11, but Donald Trump rattled the markets on February 7 by saying that he would not be meeting his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping before the March 1 deadline for the two countries to forge a deal or possibly end up escalating their battle.
That forced the financial markets to recalibrate their optimism with regard to the two countries putting all their conflicts behind them soon. Oil swooned along with global equities.
Trump had tweeted at the end of January that a “final deal” would not be made until he and Xi met and thrashed out some of the “long-standing” and “more difficult” issues the US has with Chinese trade practices.
With a comprehensive US-China trade deal in the next few weeks ruled out, and a ratcheting up of US tariffs from March 2 equally inconceivable, we discuss the likely middle-ground scenarios and what they mean for crude price direction.
Overall, though, the oil market could remain in limbo for a while. There are a number of supply risks gathering on the horizon, but those will likely not move center-stage until the economic worries that have gripped investors since the fourth quarter of last year are laid to rest.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
A high-level US delegation will be in Beijing for trade talks in the week of February 11, but Donald Trump rattled the markets on February 7 by saying that he would not be meeting his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping before the March 1 deadline for the two countries to forge a deal or possibly end up escalating their battle.
That forced the financial markets to recalibrate their optimism with regard to the two countries putting all their conflicts behind them soon. Oil swooned along with global equities.
Trump had tweeted at the end of January that a “final deal” would not be made until he and Xi met and thrashed out some of the “long-standing” and “more difficult” issues the US has with Chinese trade practices.
With a comprehensive US-China trade deal in the next few weeks ruled out, and a ratcheting up of US tariffs from March 2 equally inconceivable, we discuss the likely middle-ground scenarios and what they mean for crude price direction.
Overall, though, the oil market could remain in limbo for a while. There are a number of supply risks gathering on the horizon, but those will likely not move center-stage until the economic worries that have gripped investors since the fourth quarter of last year are laid to rest.
Global Semiconductor Sales for December 2018 amounted to $38.2 billion, down a record 7.0% MoM, according to the latest data published by the Semiconductor Industry Association (SIA). The December data reflects a sharp acceleration of a downward trend which began in November and comes as little surprise following an earnings season characterised by profit warnings led by industry giants such as Apple, Samsung and Nvidia.
The December decline amounted to ~$3 billion in absolute terms, far less than the roughly $15 billion that failed to materialise in fourth quarter sector revenues and implying that substantial amounts of inventory still remain to be consumed from within the supply chain.
As such we anticipate monthly semiconductor sales continuing to decline through April-May timeframe before stabilizing and returning to growth thereafter. We now anticipate growth to moderate significantly from the 13.7% experienced in 2018 to just 1% in 2019.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
We mentioned in our previous note prior to the listing of Maoyan Entertainment on Feb 4th that Chinese New Year (CNY) Box office from the two movies, namely Pegasus and The New King of Comedy that the company invested could be a catalyst post listing. However, our analysis of CNY box office data suggests although Pegasus reported box office revenues slightly north of RMB 1bn, it is far behind the number one movie, The Wandering Earth’s RMB 2bn box office. In addition to the company-specific movie investment, the overall box office for the CNY holiday has been disappointing, suggesting a challenging year for the movie industry in 2019.
When China’s fourth quarter GDP numbers were released in January, predictably, Bloomberg led with “China posts weakest growth since 2009” headline. The fact that the number was still 6.4% YoY, good by almost all standards, was given little attention. Being fickle, we immediately turned to the nominal GDP series – which the media continue to ignore completely – only to find that, on a quarterly annualised basis, the fourth quarter marked an acceleration in growth, from 8.5% annualised in 3Q18 to 9.3% annualised in 4Q18 (YoY it dipped to 9.2% from 9.5% in the third quarter).
Hansoh Pharmaceutical (HANSOH HK) claims to be one of the few R&D driven Chinese pharmaceutical companies. According to press reports, Hansoh aims to launch its Hong Kong IPO to raise $1 billion this month. Over the track record period, Hansoh’s financial performance shows accelerating revenue growth, relatively stable margins and solid cash generation.
Hansoh has the elements of a decent growth story, but our optimism is tempered due to mixed prospects for its drugs. Also, the huge pre-IPO dividend of RMB4.0 billion ($0.6 billion) will likely raise questions on the timing and size of the IPO.
This insight starts with a bit of history. It is entirely extraneous to the data, but I think the history is kind of fun (iron ore, Baltic Dry, and shipping has been a ‘hobby’ of mine for years). If you want to get right to the data, go to the Thin Red Line.
On the 24th of May, 1744, an announcement appeared in TheDaily Post (The Daily Poſt) that the Virginia and Maryland coffee house in Threadneedle Street, London (just east of the Bank of England) had changed its name to Virginia and Baltick Coffee House.
This is to give notice that the House, late the Virginia and Maryland Coffee-house in Threadneedle Street, near the Royal Exchange, is now open’d by the Name of the Virginia & Baltick Coffee-house, where all Foreign and Domestick News are taken in ; and all Letters or Parcels, directed to Merchants or Captains in the Virginia or Baltick Trade will be carefully deliver’d according as directed, and the best Attendance given, by Reynallds and Winboult.
Note, Punch made in any Quantity, in the greatest Perfection, without Adulteration, which is seldom found in any of the most noted Houses ; also Brandy, Rum, and Arrack (neat as imported) are sold in the Vaults under the Coffee-House, at the lowest Prices; where all Customers, we have had the Favour of serving at our late Warehouse in Leadenhall Street, we hope will continue to send their Orders as above.
We have receiv’d Advice, that Several Bags of Letters and Parcels are coming which are directed to be left at the above Coffee-House
This was perhaps because Virginia and Maryland as a name was slightly redundant. Virginia and Maryland are next to each other (if you dropped cargo in Baltimore, you went past Virginia to get there). It was perhaps because trade with Russia and Baltic countries in tallow (from Russia) used to make candles and soap [more candles than soap as Georgian England was still under the idea bathing might invite the plague to enter the pores], flax, hemp (both from modern-day Estonia and Latvia, and Russia), and other goods was fast climbing after The Muscovy Company (originally founded as The Merchant Adventurers to New Lands in 1551 to look for a northeast passage to China) lost its monopoly (enjoyed since 1555) on English trade with Russia in 1698 (though the company’s activities had been somewhat or at times largely curtailed for 50 years after the execution of Charles I of England in 1648).
The Baltic routes were effectively the same as created by the Hanseatic League many hundreds of years before when German traders in the Baltic traded wares down to the Netherlands and even London, from Livonia (Riga and northward) or Livländ as the Hansa states would have called it. And the same products were shipped on that route for almost a thousand years.
In Regency/Georgian England, flax, for example, came from Königsburg (54-55º N at 21º E), then Memel (Dermemel on the map) just up the coast, Libnau a bit further north, Riga just off the map at around 56º N, then Pernel (Latvia), Revel (Estonia), and St Petersburg further to the northeast (further off the map unfortunately). Timber imports grew dramatically after the Great Fire of London, and as imports grew and English shipbuilding increased, timber to build ships (including specifically, masts) was sourced from Norway in the late 1600s then increasingly the East Country (north Europe, Livonia (specifically Memel)) and Russia.
source: Barry Lawrence Ruderman Antique Maps (and the map)
In any case, the new name more accurately represented the business interests of those who congregated there.
The Virginia & Baltick was the place to source North Atlantic and Baltic cargoes, and cargoes rose in volume dramatically from the mid 1700s through the mid 1800s, with a drop only in the early 1810s.
In 1810, the Virginia & Baltick took over the premises of a nearby establishment called the Antwerp Tavern – also on Threadneedle – which was a considerably larger building (in the Hearth Tax (an annual levy of two shillings per annum, to make up the shortfall of ale and beer taxes paid to the sovereign) returns of 1662 it was noted as having 18 hearths). It was renamed the Baltic Coffee House then (it was also periodically the meeting place of the Albion Lodge of Masons).
Long since replaced, as far as I can tell it was located on the SE corner of Threadneedle and the alley behind the Royal Exchange. By 1823, the wild speculations in commodities and the laxity of theretofore informal arrangements on the Second Floor made it imperative for the senior tallow chandlers, soapmakers, and cargo brokers to form a Member’s Club (limited to 300). Rules were established (they are below in the Appendix).
In 1857, the Virginia & Baltick established a company, The Baltic Company Limited, and arrangements were made to take over the lease of the South Sea House (original home to the South Sea Company) at the end of Threadneedle Street. In 1900, the Baltic Exchange was incorporated as a private limited company – the Baltic Mercantile And Shipping Exchange, Limited. and took over the London Shipping Exchange. In 1903, the company established its own purpose-built premises in St. Mary’s Axe. In 1992, an IRA bomb demolished 30 St. Mary’s Axe and a few years later, permanent premises were found at 38 St. Mary’s Axe.
Nota Bene: Before the Great Fire of 1748, the most famous of London’s coffee shops were on the south side of the Royal Exchange – with most in the small area named Exchange Alley and on Birchin, and with Lloyd’s on Lombard Street (corner of Lombard and Abchurch Lane if I remember correctly). The area north and west of the Exchange was oriented towards taverns. The location of the Antwerp Tavern in relation to the map below was roughly where the bolded name of Antwerp Tavern is in the paragraph above.
A map of Coffee Houses Before the Great Fire
In 1985, the Baltic Exchange first calculated its Baltic Freight Index (now the Baltic Dry Index) as an “assessment” of conditions and charter rates amongst a panel of independent ship brokers across nearly two-dozen specific routes (all routes reported have year-round fixtures – not seasonal routes like the Great Lakes) and ship sizes (and since July 1, 2009 is an average of Handysize, Supramax, Panamax, and Capesize Timecharter averages), the data for which is then verified and averaged by the Exchange, and disseminated to members. The route specifics are quite detailed and require “massaging” in order to get normalized data from the specified delivery item (for Capesize Route C2, it is a 180kmt DWT ship on 18.2m SSW draft, max age 10yrs, LOA 290m, beam 45m, TPC 121, 198kcbm grain, 14 knots laden, 15 knots ballast on 62mt fuel oil (380cst) no diesel at sea with the route details as below).
C2: Tubarao to Rotterdam. 160,000lt iron ore, 10% more or less in owner’s option, free in and out. Laydays/cancelling 20/35 days from index date. 6 days, Sundays + holidays included all purposes. 6 hrs turn time at loading port, 6 hrs turn time at discharge port, 0.5% in lieu of weighing. Freight based on long tons. Age max 18 yrs. 3.75% total commission.
There are audits of the brokers, and no shipbrokers are allowed to have “money in the market.” A full index methodology document is available for those who care for it (message me for the PDF).
It’s That Time Of Year, Again.
The Baltic Dry Index (BDIY INDEX) is an indicator published by The Baltic Exchange, in London, first distributed in 1985 and something which gained popularity as a tool for equity investors to “see” the bulk market in the early 2000s.
data: Baltic Exchange, etc
The index has changed somewhat over the years with the current calculation starting in 2009. It is currently calculated as an average of the Capesize, Panamax, Supramax, and Handysize TimeCharter averages, with a slightly complicated weighting system across a variety of routes. An example for Capesize is in the Appendix (below the Rules & Regulations of the Baltic Coffee House of 1823). Most of the routes have a very heavy weighting to Asia. 75% of the weights of Capesize, Panamax, and Supramax have an Asia or Trans-Pacific end of leg to them (Handysize is 50% Asia end, 50% Europe end).
The increased interest on the part of non-freight customers was because the advent of dramatic increases in raw materials imports to China in the early 2000s meant a significant squeeze on ship time. And because there is seasonality to China and its raw materials imports, more seasonality started showing up in the Baltic Dry Index.
Generically, when raw material pricing goes up because raw material demand goes up, bulker rates go up. When raw material pricing goes up because of natural disaster-induced shortages, the effect can be mixed. For example, if for whatever reason iron ore could not be shipped from Australia to China for a period, shipping costs might rise dramatically (if the materials themselves existed to be exported from elsewhere) simply because of greater ship time to export from say Tubarao to China than from Western Australia to China. Right now, the China-based cost to ship a tonne of iron ore from WA to China is less than US$5 while from Tubarao it is $13. If a serious Brazil export drop were to occur, iron ore would go up in price because of the near-term scarcity, but freight prices might not go up that much because the change in time per tonne required to ship would drop (though they might go up on a scarcity of appropriate ships).
In any case, that China seasonality has another very interesting and over-riding characteristic.
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
Global Semiconductor Sales for December 2018 amounted to $38.2 billion, down a record 7.0% MoM, according to the latest data published by the Semiconductor Industry Association (SIA). The December data reflects a sharp acceleration of a downward trend which began in November and comes as little surprise following an earnings season characterised by profit warnings led by industry giants such as Apple, Samsung and Nvidia.
The December decline amounted to ~$3 billion in absolute terms, far less than the roughly $15 billion that failed to materialise in fourth quarter sector revenues and implying that substantial amounts of inventory still remain to be consumed from within the supply chain.
As such we anticipate monthly semiconductor sales continuing to decline through April-May timeframe before stabilizing and returning to growth thereafter. We now anticipate growth to moderate significantly from the 13.7% experienced in 2018 to just 1% in 2019.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
When China’s fourth quarter GDP numbers were released in January, predictably, Bloomberg led with “China posts weakest growth since 2009” headline. The fact that the number was still 6.4% YoY, good by almost all standards, was given little attention. Being fickle, we immediately turned to the nominal GDP series – which the media continue to ignore completely – only to find that, on a quarterly annualised basis, the fourth quarter marked an acceleration in growth, from 8.5% annualised in 3Q18 to 9.3% annualised in 4Q18 (YoY it dipped to 9.2% from 9.5% in the third quarter).
Hansoh Pharmaceutical (HANSOH HK) claims to be one of the few R&D driven Chinese pharmaceutical companies. According to press reports, Hansoh aims to launch its Hong Kong IPO to raise $1 billion this month. Over the track record period, Hansoh’s financial performance shows accelerating revenue growth, relatively stable margins and solid cash generation.
Hansoh has the elements of a decent growth story, but our optimism is tempered due to mixed prospects for its drugs. Also, the huge pre-IPO dividend of RMB4.0 billion ($0.6 billion) will likely raise questions on the timing and size of the IPO.
This insight starts with a bit of history. It is entirely extraneous to the data, but I think the history is kind of fun (iron ore, Baltic Dry, and shipping has been a ‘hobby’ of mine for years). If you want to get right to the data, go to the Thin Red Line.
On the 24th of May, 1744, an announcement appeared in TheDaily Post (The Daily Poſt) that the Virginia and Maryland coffee house in Threadneedle Street, London (just east of the Bank of England) had changed its name to Virginia and Baltick Coffee House.
This is to give notice that the House, late the Virginia and Maryland Coffee-house in Threadneedle Street, near the Royal Exchange, is now open’d by the Name of the Virginia & Baltick Coffee-house, where all Foreign and Domestick News are taken in ; and all Letters or Parcels, directed to Merchants or Captains in the Virginia or Baltick Trade will be carefully deliver’d according as directed, and the best Attendance given, by Reynallds and Winboult.
Note, Punch made in any Quantity, in the greatest Perfection, without Adulteration, which is seldom found in any of the most noted Houses ; also Brandy, Rum, and Arrack (neat as imported) are sold in the Vaults under the Coffee-House, at the lowest Prices; where all Customers, we have had the Favour of serving at our late Warehouse in Leadenhall Street, we hope will continue to send their Orders as above.
We have receiv’d Advice, that Several Bags of Letters and Parcels are coming which are directed to be left at the above Coffee-House
This was perhaps because Virginia and Maryland as a name was slightly redundant. Virginia and Maryland are next to each other (if you dropped cargo in Baltimore, you went past Virginia to get there). It was perhaps because trade with Russia and Baltic countries in tallow (from Russia) used to make candles and soap [more candles than soap as Georgian England was still under the idea bathing might invite the plague to enter the pores], flax, hemp (both from modern-day Estonia and Latvia, and Russia), and other goods was fast climbing after The Muscovy Company (originally founded as The Merchant Adventurers to New Lands in 1551 to look for a northeast passage to China) lost its monopoly (enjoyed since 1555) on English trade with Russia in 1698 (though the company’s activities had been somewhat or at times largely curtailed for 50 years after the execution of Charles I of England in 1648).
The Baltic routes were effectively the same as created by the Hanseatic League many hundreds of years before when German traders in the Baltic traded wares down to the Netherlands and even London, from Livonia (Riga and northward) or Livländ as the Hansa states would have called it. And the same products were shipped on that route for almost a thousand years.
In Regency/Georgian England, flax, for example, came from Königsburg (54-55º N at 21º E), then Memel (Dermemel on the map) just up the coast, Libnau a bit further north, Riga just off the map at around 56º N, then Pernel (Latvia), Revel (Estonia), and St Petersburg further to the northeast (further off the map unfortunately). Timber imports grew dramatically after the Great Fire of London, and as imports grew and English shipbuilding increased, timber to build ships (including specifically, masts) was sourced from Norway in the late 1600s then increasingly the East Country (north Europe, Livonia (specifically Memel)) and Russia.
source: Barry Lawrence Ruderman Antique Maps (and the map)
In any case, the new name more accurately represented the business interests of those who congregated there.
The Virginia & Baltick was the place to source North Atlantic and Baltic cargoes, and cargoes rose in volume dramatically from the mid 1700s through the mid 1800s, with a drop only in the early 1810s.
In 1810, the Virginia & Baltick took over the premises of a nearby establishment called the Antwerp Tavern – also on Threadneedle – which was a considerably larger building (in the Hearth Tax (an annual levy of two shillings per annum, to make up the shortfall of ale and beer taxes paid to the sovereign) returns of 1662 it was noted as having 18 hearths). It was renamed the Baltic Coffee House then (it was also periodically the meeting place of the Albion Lodge of Masons).
Long since replaced, as far as I can tell it was located on the SE corner of Threadneedle and the alley behind the Royal Exchange. By 1823, the wild speculations in commodities and the laxity of theretofore informal arrangements on the Second Floor made it imperative for the senior tallow chandlers, soapmakers, and cargo brokers to form a Member’s Club (limited to 300). Rules were established (they are below in the Appendix).
In 1857, the Virginia & Baltick established a company, The Baltic Company Limited, and arrangements were made to take over the lease of the South Sea House (original home to the South Sea Company) at the end of Threadneedle Street. In 1900, the Baltic Exchange was incorporated as a private limited company – the Baltic Mercantile And Shipping Exchange, Limited. and took over the London Shipping Exchange. In 1903, the company established its own purpose-built premises in St. Mary’s Axe. In 1992, an IRA bomb demolished 30 St. Mary’s Axe and a few years later, permanent premises were found at 38 St. Mary’s Axe.
Nota Bene: Before the Great Fire of 1748, the most famous of London’s coffee shops were on the south side of the Royal Exchange – with most in the small area named Exchange Alley and on Birchin, and with Lloyd’s on Lombard Street (corner of Lombard and Abchurch Lane if I remember correctly). The area north and west of the Exchange was oriented towards taverns. The location of the Antwerp Tavern in relation to the map below was roughly where the bolded name of Antwerp Tavern is in the paragraph above.
A map of Coffee Houses Before the Great Fire
In 1985, the Baltic Exchange first calculated its Baltic Freight Index (now the Baltic Dry Index) as an “assessment” of conditions and charter rates amongst a panel of independent ship brokers across nearly two-dozen specific routes (all routes reported have year-round fixtures – not seasonal routes like the Great Lakes) and ship sizes (and since July 1, 2009 is an average of Handysize, Supramax, Panamax, and Capesize Timecharter averages), the data for which is then verified and averaged by the Exchange, and disseminated to members. The route specifics are quite detailed and require “massaging” in order to get normalized data from the specified delivery item (for Capesize Route C2, it is a 180kmt DWT ship on 18.2m SSW draft, max age 10yrs, LOA 290m, beam 45m, TPC 121, 198kcbm grain, 14 knots laden, 15 knots ballast on 62mt fuel oil (380cst) no diesel at sea with the route details as below).
C2: Tubarao to Rotterdam. 160,000lt iron ore, 10% more or less in owner’s option, free in and out. Laydays/cancelling 20/35 days from index date. 6 days, Sundays + holidays included all purposes. 6 hrs turn time at loading port, 6 hrs turn time at discharge port, 0.5% in lieu of weighing. Freight based on long tons. Age max 18 yrs. 3.75% total commission.
There are audits of the brokers, and no shipbrokers are allowed to have “money in the market.” A full index methodology document is available for those who care for it (message me for the PDF).
It’s That Time Of Year, Again.
The Baltic Dry Index (BDIY INDEX) is an indicator published by The Baltic Exchange, in London, first distributed in 1985 and something which gained popularity as a tool for equity investors to “see” the bulk market in the early 2000s.
data: Baltic Exchange, etc
The index has changed somewhat over the years with the current calculation starting in 2009. It is currently calculated as an average of the Capesize, Panamax, Supramax, and Handysize TimeCharter averages, with a slightly complicated weighting system across a variety of routes. An example for Capesize is in the Appendix (below the Rules & Regulations of the Baltic Coffee House of 1823). Most of the routes have a very heavy weighting to Asia. 75% of the weights of Capesize, Panamax, and Supramax have an Asia or Trans-Pacific end of leg to them (Handysize is 50% Asia end, 50% Europe end).
The increased interest on the part of non-freight customers was because the advent of dramatic increases in raw materials imports to China in the early 2000s meant a significant squeeze on ship time. And because there is seasonality to China and its raw materials imports, more seasonality started showing up in the Baltic Dry Index.
Generically, when raw material pricing goes up because raw material demand goes up, bulker rates go up. When raw material pricing goes up because of natural disaster-induced shortages, the effect can be mixed. For example, if for whatever reason iron ore could not be shipped from Australia to China for a period, shipping costs might rise dramatically (if the materials themselves existed to be exported from elsewhere) simply because of greater ship time to export from say Tubarao to China than from Western Australia to China. Right now, the China-based cost to ship a tonne of iron ore from WA to China is less than US$5 while from Tubarao it is $13. If a serious Brazil export drop were to occur, iron ore would go up in price because of the near-term scarcity, but freight prices might not go up that much because the change in time per tonne required to ship would drop (though they might go up on a scarcity of appropriate ships).
In any case, that China seasonality has another very interesting and over-riding characteristic.
A high-level US delegation will be in Beijing for trade talks in the week of February 11, but Donald Trump rattled the markets on February 7 by saying that he would not be meeting his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping before the March 1 deadline for the two countries to forge a deal or possibly end up escalating their battle.
That forced the financial markets to recalibrate their optimism with regard to the two countries putting all their conflicts behind them soon. Oil swooned along with global equities.
Trump had tweeted at the end of January that a “final deal” would not be made until he and Xi met and thrashed out some of the “long-standing” and “more difficult” issues the US has with Chinese trade practices.
With a comprehensive US-China trade deal in the next few weeks ruled out, and a ratcheting up of US tariffs from March 2 equally inconceivable, we discuss the likely middle-ground scenarios and what they mean for crude price direction.
Overall, though, the oil market could remain in limbo for a while. There are a number of supply risks gathering on the horizon, but those will likely not move center-stage until the economic worries that have gripped investors since the fourth quarter of last year are laid to rest.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
Hansoh Pharmaceutical (HANSOH HK) claims to be one of the few R&D driven Chinese pharmaceutical companies. According to press reports, Hansoh aims to launch its Hong Kong IPO to raise $1 billion this month. Over the track record period, Hansoh’s financial performance shows accelerating revenue growth, relatively stable margins and solid cash generation.
Hansoh has the elements of a decent growth story, but our optimism is tempered due to mixed prospects for its drugs. Also, the huge pre-IPO dividend of RMB4.0 billion ($0.6 billion) will likely raise questions on the timing and size of the IPO.
This insight starts with a bit of history. It is entirely extraneous to the data, but I think the history is kind of fun (iron ore, Baltic Dry, and shipping has been a ‘hobby’ of mine for years). If you want to get right to the data, go to the Thin Red Line.
On the 24th of May, 1744, an announcement appeared in TheDaily Post (The Daily Poſt) that the Virginia and Maryland coffee house in Threadneedle Street, London (just east of the Bank of England) had changed its name to Virginia and Baltick Coffee House.
This is to give notice that the House, late the Virginia and Maryland Coffee-house in Threadneedle Street, near the Royal Exchange, is now open’d by the Name of the Virginia & Baltick Coffee-house, where all Foreign and Domestick News are taken in ; and all Letters or Parcels, directed to Merchants or Captains in the Virginia or Baltick Trade will be carefully deliver’d according as directed, and the best Attendance given, by Reynallds and Winboult.
Note, Punch made in any Quantity, in the greatest Perfection, without Adulteration, which is seldom found in any of the most noted Houses ; also Brandy, Rum, and Arrack (neat as imported) are sold in the Vaults under the Coffee-House, at the lowest Prices; where all Customers, we have had the Favour of serving at our late Warehouse in Leadenhall Street, we hope will continue to send their Orders as above.
We have receiv’d Advice, that Several Bags of Letters and Parcels are coming which are directed to be left at the above Coffee-House
This was perhaps because Virginia and Maryland as a name was slightly redundant. Virginia and Maryland are next to each other (if you dropped cargo in Baltimore, you went past Virginia to get there). It was perhaps because trade with Russia and Baltic countries in tallow (from Russia) used to make candles and soap [more candles than soap as Georgian England was still under the idea bathing might invite the plague to enter the pores], flax, hemp (both from modern-day Estonia and Latvia, and Russia), and other goods was fast climbing after The Muscovy Company (originally founded as The Merchant Adventurers to New Lands in 1551 to look for a northeast passage to China) lost its monopoly (enjoyed since 1555) on English trade with Russia in 1698 (though the company’s activities had been somewhat or at times largely curtailed for 50 years after the execution of Charles I of England in 1648).
The Baltic routes were effectively the same as created by the Hanseatic League many hundreds of years before when German traders in the Baltic traded wares down to the Netherlands and even London, from Livonia (Riga and northward) or Livländ as the Hansa states would have called it. And the same products were shipped on that route for almost a thousand years.
In Regency/Georgian England, flax, for example, came from Königsburg (54-55º N at 21º E), then Memel (Dermemel on the map) just up the coast, Libnau a bit further north, Riga just off the map at around 56º N, then Pernel (Latvia), Revel (Estonia), and St Petersburg further to the northeast (further off the map unfortunately). Timber imports grew dramatically after the Great Fire of London, and as imports grew and English shipbuilding increased, timber to build ships (including specifically, masts) was sourced from Norway in the late 1600s then increasingly the East Country (north Europe, Livonia (specifically Memel)) and Russia.
source: Barry Lawrence Ruderman Antique Maps (and the map)
In any case, the new name more accurately represented the business interests of those who congregated there.
The Virginia & Baltick was the place to source North Atlantic and Baltic cargoes, and cargoes rose in volume dramatically from the mid 1700s through the mid 1800s, with a drop only in the early 1810s.
In 1810, the Virginia & Baltick took over the premises of a nearby establishment called the Antwerp Tavern – also on Threadneedle – which was a considerably larger building (in the Hearth Tax (an annual levy of two shillings per annum, to make up the shortfall of ale and beer taxes paid to the sovereign) returns of 1662 it was noted as having 18 hearths). It was renamed the Baltic Coffee House then (it was also periodically the meeting place of the Albion Lodge of Masons).
Long since replaced, as far as I can tell it was located on the SE corner of Threadneedle and the alley behind the Royal Exchange. By 1823, the wild speculations in commodities and the laxity of theretofore informal arrangements on the Second Floor made it imperative for the senior tallow chandlers, soapmakers, and cargo brokers to form a Member’s Club (limited to 300). Rules were established (they are below in the Appendix).
In 1857, the Virginia & Baltick established a company, The Baltic Company Limited, and arrangements were made to take over the lease of the South Sea House (original home to the South Sea Company) at the end of Threadneedle Street. In 1900, the Baltic Exchange was incorporated as a private limited company – the Baltic Mercantile And Shipping Exchange, Limited. and took over the London Shipping Exchange. In 1903, the company established its own purpose-built premises in St. Mary’s Axe. In 1992, an IRA bomb demolished 30 St. Mary’s Axe and a few years later, permanent premises were found at 38 St. Mary’s Axe.
Nota Bene: Before the Great Fire of 1748, the most famous of London’s coffee shops were on the south side of the Royal Exchange – with most in the small area named Exchange Alley and on Birchin, and with Lloyd’s on Lombard Street (corner of Lombard and Abchurch Lane if I remember correctly). The area north and west of the Exchange was oriented towards taverns. The location of the Antwerp Tavern in relation to the map below was roughly where the bolded name of Antwerp Tavern is in the paragraph above.
A map of Coffee Houses Before the Great Fire
In 1985, the Baltic Exchange first calculated its Baltic Freight Index (now the Baltic Dry Index) as an “assessment” of conditions and charter rates amongst a panel of independent ship brokers across nearly two-dozen specific routes (all routes reported have year-round fixtures – not seasonal routes like the Great Lakes) and ship sizes (and since July 1, 2009 is an average of Handysize, Supramax, Panamax, and Capesize Timecharter averages), the data for which is then verified and averaged by the Exchange, and disseminated to members. The route specifics are quite detailed and require “massaging” in order to get normalized data from the specified delivery item (for Capesize Route C2, it is a 180kmt DWT ship on 18.2m SSW draft, max age 10yrs, LOA 290m, beam 45m, TPC 121, 198kcbm grain, 14 knots laden, 15 knots ballast on 62mt fuel oil (380cst) no diesel at sea with the route details as below).
C2: Tubarao to Rotterdam. 160,000lt iron ore, 10% more or less in owner’s option, free in and out. Laydays/cancelling 20/35 days from index date. 6 days, Sundays + holidays included all purposes. 6 hrs turn time at loading port, 6 hrs turn time at discharge port, 0.5% in lieu of weighing. Freight based on long tons. Age max 18 yrs. 3.75% total commission.
There are audits of the brokers, and no shipbrokers are allowed to have “money in the market.” A full index methodology document is available for those who care for it (message me for the PDF).
It’s That Time Of Year, Again.
The Baltic Dry Index (BDIY INDEX) is an indicator published by The Baltic Exchange, in London, first distributed in 1985 and something which gained popularity as a tool for equity investors to “see” the bulk market in the early 2000s.
data: Baltic Exchange, etc
The index has changed somewhat over the years with the current calculation starting in 2009. It is currently calculated as an average of the Capesize, Panamax, Supramax, and Handysize TimeCharter averages, with a slightly complicated weighting system across a variety of routes. An example for Capesize is in the Appendix (below the Rules & Regulations of the Baltic Coffee House of 1823). Most of the routes have a very heavy weighting to Asia. 75% of the weights of Capesize, Panamax, and Supramax have an Asia or Trans-Pacific end of leg to them (Handysize is 50% Asia end, 50% Europe end).
The increased interest on the part of non-freight customers was because the advent of dramatic increases in raw materials imports to China in the early 2000s meant a significant squeeze on ship time. And because there is seasonality to China and its raw materials imports, more seasonality started showing up in the Baltic Dry Index.
Generically, when raw material pricing goes up because raw material demand goes up, bulker rates go up. When raw material pricing goes up because of natural disaster-induced shortages, the effect can be mixed. For example, if for whatever reason iron ore could not be shipped from Australia to China for a period, shipping costs might rise dramatically (if the materials themselves existed to be exported from elsewhere) simply because of greater ship time to export from say Tubarao to China than from Western Australia to China. Right now, the China-based cost to ship a tonne of iron ore from WA to China is less than US$5 while from Tubarao it is $13. If a serious Brazil export drop were to occur, iron ore would go up in price because of the near-term scarcity, but freight prices might not go up that much because the change in time per tonne required to ship would drop (though they might go up on a scarcity of appropriate ships).
In any case, that China seasonality has another very interesting and over-riding characteristic.
A high-level US delegation will be in Beijing for trade talks in the week of February 11, but Donald Trump rattled the markets on February 7 by saying that he would not be meeting his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping before the March 1 deadline for the two countries to forge a deal or possibly end up escalating their battle.
That forced the financial markets to recalibrate their optimism with regard to the two countries putting all their conflicts behind them soon. Oil swooned along with global equities.
Trump had tweeted at the end of January that a “final deal” would not be made until he and Xi met and thrashed out some of the “long-standing” and “more difficult” issues the US has with Chinese trade practices.
With a comprehensive US-China trade deal in the next few weeks ruled out, and a ratcheting up of US tariffs from March 2 equally inconceivable, we discuss the likely middle-ground scenarios and what they mean for crude price direction.
Overall, though, the oil market could remain in limbo for a while. There are a number of supply risks gathering on the horizon, but those will likely not move center-stage until the economic worries that have gripped investors since the fourth quarter of last year are laid to rest.
Global Semiconductor Sales for December 2018 amounted to $38.2 billion, down a record 7.0% MoM, according to the latest data published by the Semiconductor Industry Association (SIA). The December data reflects a sharp acceleration of a downward trend which began in November and comes as little surprise following an earnings season characterised by profit warnings led by industry giants such as Apple, Samsung and Nvidia.
The December decline amounted to ~$3 billion in absolute terms, far less than the roughly $15 billion that failed to materialise in fourth quarter sector revenues and implying that substantial amounts of inventory still remain to be consumed from within the supply chain.
As such we anticipate monthly semiconductor sales continuing to decline through April-May timeframe before stabilizing and returning to growth thereafter. We now anticipate growth to moderate significantly from the 13.7% experienced in 2018 to just 1% in 2019.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
Global Semiconductor Sales for December 2018 amounted to $38.2 billion, down a record 7.0% MoM, according to the latest data published by the Semiconductor Industry Association (SIA). The December data reflects a sharp acceleration of a downward trend which began in November and comes as little surprise following an earnings season characterised by profit warnings led by industry giants such as Apple, Samsung and Nvidia.
The December decline amounted to ~$3 billion in absolute terms, far less than the roughly $15 billion that failed to materialise in fourth quarter sector revenues and implying that substantial amounts of inventory still remain to be consumed from within the supply chain.
As such we anticipate monthly semiconductor sales continuing to decline through April-May timeframe before stabilizing and returning to growth thereafter. We now anticipate growth to moderate significantly from the 13.7% experienced in 2018 to just 1% in 2019.
In this version of the GER weekly research wrap, we remind of our work on Softbank Group (9984 JP) before its 20% share rally which may have been prognosticated by its sweeping debt tender. Secondly, Arun updates on his excellent and contrarian call on Pinduoduo (PDD US) after its follow on placement announcement – of which he takes a more moderated view with the shares up 60% since IPO launch. Finally, we update on the IPO of Koolearn (1373356D HK) which provided an update to its prospectus. A calendar of upcoming catalysts is also attached.
More details can be found below.
Best of luck for the new week – Rickin, Venkat and Arun
In my weekly digest China News That Matters, I will give you selected summaries, sourced from a variety of local Chinese-language and international news outlets, and highlight why I think the news is significant. These posts are meant to neither be bullish nor bearish, but help you separate the signal from the noise.
When Bain announced its MBO for Kosaido at ¥610/share, Travis Lundy concluded (in his insight Smallcap Kosaido (7868 JP) Tender Offer: Wrong Price But Whaddya Gonna Do?) that it was a lowball bid and a virtual asset strip in progress. The kind of thing which gives activist hedge funds a bad name, but when cloaked in the finery of “Private Equity”, it looks like the renewal of a business. The share price jumped from the 400s to just under the Tender Offer Price, traded there for several days, then a week after it started trading at or near arb terms, the share price suddenly jumped through terms and headed higher.
Travis’ inclination at Thursday’s price (¥775/share) is that at a 30% discount to book, there could be enough here to entice someone to split the company up at a slightly better level, but he doubts that it is worth 1x book. Given the headaches involved in making this company worth more than book, it would be worth less than book now. If the Info business can be rescued, then it is cheap. If it cannot, it is not.
Because “management-friendly” shareholders currently hold at least 40% and probably more like 50+%, Travis thinks Murakami-san will find it really tough to mount, or get someone else to mount, a truly hostile action.
Perhaps Murakami-san’s goal here is to block the deal then get management to use debt to buy out other people and expand the funeral parlour business, then get a strategic to buy the whole thing out. It could be, but Travis doesn’t think chasing the market at 25-30% above where Murakami-san got in is a good risk.
Since Travis wrote, Murakami-san’s vehicles have added another 1.24% to reach 9.55% of shares out. The last set of shares was purchased at an average of ¥652/share.
This past Thursday 7 February, Descente announced a weak Position Statement (Against) (in Japanese) the Itochu Corp (8001 JP) Tender Offer with a 28-page supporting powerpoint deck (also in Japanese). Descente appears to have no ability to defend itself, and its claim that a large shareholder like Itochu could damage corporate value by weakening governance is effectively a statement that others (like perhaps Wacoal) would too, so only a full takeover makes sense under that defense.
Descente management’s explanation for why Itochu owning 40% would be bad is almost a paean to good governance. If the influence of suppliers and customers in the shareholder register is bad, it is bad – whether friendly to management or not. Conflict of interest can happen via entrenchment.
The lack of a white knight proposed and effective “I got nothing, but please don’t tender” response is bearish for the shares. if management is right and Itochu’s presence at 40% will lower corporate value, the back end might be worth less than ¥1,871/share where it was trading pre-tender. That would mean the fair value of shares now would still be below here.
If Itochu gets its 40% and ANTA votes with Itochu, it is highly possible that the two could effect dramatic change at the management and board level. That would be very hostile and corporate Japan would have something to say about that. Travis says “I am not sure Itochu would go that hostile immediately.”
Michael Causton just wrote about Descente’s rejection of the Itochu tender saying “The Gloves Are Off”. He notes there is a perception of a cultural difference between Descente’s brand cultivation and Itochu Textile’s hands-off approach to brand management, but notes that the differences between Descente and Itochu need to be resolved quickly in order to optimally ramp up brand awareness and sales points ahead of the Rugby World Cup in Japan this year, the Olympics, next year, and the World Masters Games the year after.
ND Software (NDS) announced a MBO sponsored by both the existing president, who owns 20%, and J-Will Partners to take the company private at ¥1700/share, which is a 28.7% premium to last trade and comes out to be ~7.2x trailing 12-month EV/EBITDA. The deal comes with a 66.7% minimum threshold for completion, after which there will be a two-step squeeze-out, as is the norm in deals like this. Looks straightforward, but …
Sometime activist Symphony Financial Partners (SFP) holds around 20% in NDS. If on board, this this deal is almost done because 31.26% is already pledged to tender, Symphony’s stake would make it 51.5%. Other presumably management-friendly shareholders own another 10%, and employees own about 7%. If Symphony is on board, that easily clears the 67% hurdle. If SFP are not on board, they own about 60% of what is necessary to block this deal. And they could buy on market to raise their stake further.
Travis would not want to sell out his shares tomorrow at ¥1699/share. Or even ¥1701. He thinks there is a chance that the loose float is scooped up by shareholders or players who might want to increase their stake and see if this deal can be bumped.
Palpina confirmed that the Ernst Göhner Foundation, Panalpina’s largest shareholder (46% of shares out) does not support the current non-binding proposal from DSV and that it supports Panalpina’s Board of Directors in pursuing an independent growth strategy that includes M&A. Panalpina’a stock tanked, but is trading only 3% below DSV’s indicative offer, and 20.5% above where the stock was trading in mid-January before DSV’s indicative non-binding proposal.
If management had said that they have a plan which is to grow themselves out of their current doldrums, and their largest shareholder supports that plan to stick with management and go slow, nothing will get done until the new chairman is installed in May at the AGM, and even then, given the Foundation’s position that they support management’s “independent growth strategy”, there is not much minority shareholders can do.
This is an ongoing issue of governance. If the directors are effectively chosen by the Ernst Göhner Foundation, which supports the company’s independence, so they do too, minority shareholders serve no purpose other than to provide capital for the foundation to keep Panalpina listed.
This doesn’t mean that there will be no deal, but it does mean there will be a lull unless someone else comes up with a more aggressive offer. Travis expects this is eventually worth another go but he would want to reload lower and/or later, or when Panalpina is in a better position after the full IT package is deployed.
Since Travis wrote, DSV has released earnings and said it is still significantly engaged in the bid, and comments from the chairman of the Ernst Göhner Foundation has made comments suggesting it is not wedded to the idea, so it comes down to price – someone has to pay now to get the benefits expected from the full IT package.
Travis pointed out in the discussions that interestingly, when DSV released earnings it did not announce a buyback, which would have been normal, leading some to speculate the company is saving its cash for another go at it.
On its fourth attempt Medco Energi Internasional T (MEDC IJ)receives board approval for its £0.55/share (66% premium to the closing price) offer for Ophir. The deal is conditional on receiving 75% shareholder approval, approval from the relevant authorities in Tanzania and Ophir not losing all or substantially all of its Bualuang interests in Thailand. It is expected that the Scheme will become effective in the first half of2019.
There is an opportunistic element to Medco’s tilt after Ophir recently announced the denial of the license extension for the Fortuna project by the Equatorial Guinea Ministry of Mines and Hydrocarbons. This resulted in a $300mn non-cash impairment. Ophir had previously written down $310mn on the same project back in September.
Shareholders such as Petrus (~2.8% stake) won’t support the offer having announced in mid-Jan that Medco’s earlier £0.485/share proposal “massively under-values” Ophir.
Reg approvals are not expected to be an issue – the stake in Tanzania is for a 20% non-controlling interest, a similar % approved in a prior sale to Pavilion in 2015. There is no approval/consent required from the Thai authorities – it is in there really to cover the unlikely situation that for some reason the Thai authorities raise an objection.
Ophir’s shares are trading at or close to terms. Given Medco’s numerous proposals in short succession – four in three months – a bump cannot be dismissed. And the recent disclosure of a new shareholder (Sand Grove) may warrant such an outcome. A firm offer is on the table backed by the Ophir’s board. I’d look to get involved a spread or two below terms.
On January 23, after months of media speculation, RPC announced a final cash offer by a unit of Apollo Global Management for £7.82/share by way of a scheme. Two institutional shareholders, Aviva, with 1.93% and Royal London Asset Management, with 1.44%, immediately expressed disappointment with the offer valuation.
On January 31, Berry Global Group, a former Apollo portfolio company, announced it was considering a possible cash offer for RPC and has requested due diligence. RPC responded with a release confirming it will engage with Berry in order to advance discussions in the interests of delivering best value to shareholders.
The price being paid by Apollo is not very generous, though RPC’s sale process has been widely reported since September, 2018. Apollo’s ‘no increase’ declaration has made it easy for BERY to win this, provided no one else comes to the party. (I reached out to RPC who confirmed Apollo is restricted from countering a higher bid as it is bound by the language in the Offer announcement that the offer of £7.82 per share is final and will not be increased.) So there is limited upside from here unless you think someone else could join BERY as a late gatecrasher.
Apollo’s offer provides an effective floor so there is limited downside from here, especially under strict UK rules which make it difficult for an acquirer to walk. John DeMasi recommend buying RPC on the possibility BERY comes out with a generous offer or another buyer shows up due to the undemanding valuation of Apollo’s offer.
BIDU’s core business (primarily online/mobile search services plus new initiatives such as Baidu Cloud and autonomous driving), accounts for 78% of NAV, with net cash a further 8% of NAV.
Fundamentally, BIDU’s core business has grown healthily, with strong cash flows generation. Johannes estimates the market is unjustifiably valuing this business at US$49.3bn, or 8.7x 2019E EV/EBITDA or 11.2x 2019P, suggesting little to no growth prospect.
By my calcs, CJ Corp is trading at a 52% discount to NAV compared to a 52-week average of 41%. CJ C and CJ ENM comprise 63% of NAV.
Of note, the stub ops still account for 29% of NAV and primarily comprises the 55.13% stake in CJ Olive Networks and brand royalty, each accounting for ~13% of NAV.
Curtis Lehnert recommends closing the Toyota set-up trade, which hasn’t exactly been a storming one (4% or 1.96% on the gross notional).
Toyota announced earning recently which (slightly) beat expectations slightly and the stock rallied in response. This move brought the discount to NAV in line with its 6-month average and has eroded the statistical edge of staying in the trade.
The fundamentals for Toyota are still attractive, therefore it could be argued to hold the stub beyond these levels. However, Curtis has opted for the tactical route in the current environment and take profits when a statistical edge disappears.
My ongoing series flags large moves (~10%) in CCASS holdings over the past week or so, moves which are often outside normal market transactions. These may be indicative of share pledges. Or potential takeovers. Or simply help understand volume swings.
Often these moves can easily be explained – the placement of new shares, rights issue, movements subsequent to a takeover, amongst others. For those mentioned below, I could not find an obvious reason for the CCASS move.
Designation of Common Stock as Securities To Be Delisted by TSE
C
Japan
Showa Shell
Scheme
1-Apr
Close of offer
E
NZ
Trade Me Group
Scheme
14-Feb
Takeovers Panel and NZX on Booklet
C
Singapore
Courts Asia
Scheme
15-Mar
Offer Close Date
C
Singapore
M1 Limited
Off Mkt
18-Feb
Closing date of offer
C
Singapore
PCI Limited
Scheme
February
Release of Scheme Booklet
E
Thailand
Delta
Off Mkt
February-April
SAMR of China Approval
C
Finland
Amer Sports
Off Mkt
28-Feb
Offer Period Expires
C
Norway
Oslo Børs VPS
Off Mkt
4-Mar
Nasdaq Offer Close Date
C
Switzerland
Panalpina
Off Mkt
27-Feb
Binding offer to be announced
E
US
Red Hat, Inc.
Scheme
March/April
Deal lodged with EU Regulators
C
Source: Company announcements. E = our estimates; C =confirm
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
