China

In this briefing:

1. Up Fintech (Tiger Brokers) Pre-IPO Quick Note – Much Too Reliant on IBKR
2. JD.com (JD): The Real Main Business Grew 46% YoY, and Not 20% YoY in 4Q2018
3. Sea Ltd: Further Share Re-Rating After a 35% Daily Gain? Why Not?
4. Global Bottoming Process Continues; Remain Overweight China
5. Tesla – Truth and Consequences

1. Up Fintech (Tiger Brokers) Pre-IPO Quick Note – Much Too Reliant on IBKR

Up Fintech (TIGR US) plans to raise up to US$150m in its US listing. The company counts Xiaomi Corp (1810 HK) and Interactive Brokers Group, Inc (IBKR US) as its main investors.

While TIGR has grown at a stupendous pace over the past three years, it has been able to do so owing to IBKR doing most of the heavy lifting of execution and clearing. While its trying to change that now, nearly all the revenue is still being driven by its IBKR affiliation.

I’ve covered some of the aspects of TIGR’s model in Futu Holdings IPO Quick Note – Comparison with Tiger Brokers – Same Market, Different Economics. In this insight, I’ll take a quick look at the company’s performance and the issues highlighted above. 

2. JD.com (JD): The Real Main Business Grew 46% YoY, and Not 20% YoY in 4Q2018

• We believe the real main business line is service (commission), but not product (direct sales).
• In 4Q2018, service revenues grew by 46% YoY, but nominal main business line, product, grew only 20%.
• JD raised its commission rate in 2018, as demonstrating  that the company still has the bargaining power over retailers.
• Historical GMV numbers suggest significant upside.

3. Sea Ltd: Further Share Re-Rating After a 35% Daily Gain? Why Not?

• The biggest positive surprise from Sea Ltd’s (SE US) conference call is strong 2019 adjusted sales guidance: 82%-97% YoY growth for Garena (digital entertainment division) and 117-127% YoY growth for Shopee (e-commerce arm).
• Management expects first positive quarterly EBITDA for Shopee Taiwan operations in 1Q19, indicating there is a path to profitability for Shopee’s business model.
• Another great news: management expresses high confidence that Shopee’s S&M expenses in terms of absolute dollars would trend down in 2019, vs. 2018.
• After a 35% daily share gain on 27 Feb, SE trades at 4.1x 2019E P/adjusted revenue excl. 1P sales, yet still a whopping 49% discount to Pinduoduo’s (PDD US) 8.1x P/S.

4. Global Bottoming Process Continues; Remain Overweight China

The MSCI ACWI and ACWI ex-US have managed to break above their respective 200-day moving averages, and are now bumping up against overhead resistance.  Supportive of a bottoming global market, cyclical Sectors are emerging as leadership. We examine the technical state of major developed and EM markets and highlight in today’s report and highlight attractive and actionable stocks within the Materials, Manufacturing, and Technology sectors.

5. Tesla – Truth and Consequences

Tesla’s problems aren’t going away, they’re escalating:

• Elon Musk is in trouble again with the SEC;
• Tesla’s brand-new general counsel is leaving after just two months on the job;

• Consumer Reports withdrew its recommendation on the flagship Model 3 due to serious quality and reliability concerns–not actually surprising given increasing risks I have tracked  with Tesla quality controls curtailed and flawed cars increasingly delivered to customers (see “Musk and Weird Q3 Developments Are Driving Investors to Telsa’s Rivals” and “Tesla – Dave’s Not Here, and Musk Won’t Leave” and “Tesla: Down to the Wire”).

• The 2018 10-K filing confirms Tesla’s operations still are not generating consistently sustainable profits or cash flow unvarnished by substantial boosts from accounting maneuvers and unusual items as seen with the “miracle” third quarter (see “Great Magic Trick Tesla; Now Do it Again“)
• Which is bad news for first quarter results already foundering with pricing cuts, rising costs, unhappy customers, and escalating demand pressure;
• Plus liquidity strain worsened by $920 million in cash due to go out on March 1st to pay off maturing convertible bonds.
• Tesla Shanghai Gigafactory construction is underway and yet still not fully funded after at least six months of negotiations with bankers, and thus may also be developing differently versus what Tesla has presented (adding to my previously noted concerns in “Tesla – Shanghai Surprise“).

The common theme here is that all these problems were preventable, avoidable, and unnecessary. 

That’s not going away any time soon–as long as Musk remains in complete control.

How long will that be? 

Good question–Read on as Bond Angle analysis continues.

In this briefing:

1. Sea Ltd: Further Share Re-Rating After a 35% Daily Gain? Why Not?
2. Global Bottoming Process Continues; Remain Overweight China
3. Tesla – Truth and Consequences
4. Descente Descended and Itochu Angle Is More Hostile
5. China Housing: City Picks For The Near-Term Cyclical Upside

1. Sea Ltd: Further Share Re-Rating After a 35% Daily Gain? Why Not?

• The biggest positive surprise from Sea Ltd’s (SE US) conference call is strong 2019 adjusted sales guidance: 82%-97% YoY growth for Garena (digital entertainment division) and 117-127% YoY growth for Shopee (e-commerce arm).
• Management expects first positive quarterly EBITDA for Shopee Taiwan operations in 1Q19, indicating there is a path to profitability for Shopee’s business model.
• Another great news: management expresses high confidence that Shopee’s S&M expenses in terms of absolute dollars would trend down in 2019, vs. 2018.
• After a 35% daily share gain on 27 Feb, SE trades at 4.1x 2019E P/adjusted revenue excl. 1P sales, yet still a whopping 49% discount to Pinduoduo’s (PDD US) 8.1x P/S.

2. Global Bottoming Process Continues; Remain Overweight China

The MSCI ACWI and ACWI ex-US have managed to break above their respective 200-day moving averages, and are now bumping up against overhead resistance.  Supportive of a bottoming global market, cyclical Sectors are emerging as leadership. We examine the technical state of major developed and EM markets and highlight in today’s report and highlight attractive and actionable stocks within the Materials, Manufacturing, and Technology sectors.

3. Tesla – Truth and Consequences

Tesla’s problems aren’t going away, they’re escalating:

• Elon Musk is in trouble again with the SEC;
• Tesla’s brand-new general counsel is leaving after just two months on the job;

• Consumer Reports withdrew its recommendation on the flagship Model 3 due to serious quality and reliability concerns–not actually surprising given increasing risks I have tracked  with Tesla quality controls curtailed and flawed cars increasingly delivered to customers (see “Musk and Weird Q3 Developments Are Driving Investors to Telsa’s Rivals” and “Tesla – Dave’s Not Here, and Musk Won’t Leave” and “Tesla: Down to the Wire”).

• The 2018 10-K filing confirms Tesla’s operations still are not generating consistently sustainable profits or cash flow unvarnished by substantial boosts from accounting maneuvers and unusual items as seen with the “miracle” third quarter (see “Great Magic Trick Tesla; Now Do it Again“)
• Which is bad news for first quarter results already foundering with pricing cuts, rising costs, unhappy customers, and escalating demand pressure;
• Plus liquidity strain worsened by $920 million in cash due to go out on March 1st to pay off maturing convertible bonds.
• Tesla Shanghai Gigafactory construction is underway and yet still not fully funded after at least six months of negotiations with bankers, and thus may also be developing differently versus what Tesla has presented (adding to my previously noted concerns in “Tesla – Shanghai Surprise“).

The common theme here is that all these problems were preventable, avoidable, and unnecessary. 

That’s not going away any time soon–as long as Musk remains in complete control.

How long will that be? 

Good question–Read on as Bond Angle analysis continues.

4. Descente Descended and Itochu Angle Is More Hostile

Descente Ltd (8114 JP) has been in the press quite a bit in recent days with management commentary about how the company and directors disagree with the Tender Offer launched by Itochu Corp (8001 JP) to raise their stake from 30% to 40% and how it could lead to conflict of interest and worsening management, lower morale for employees, and a loss of independence.

Management, former management, and former employees have all joined the party. Wednesday saw a significant sell-down of shares to a post-Tender Offer low, but it was not clear why.

Descente had, on the 26th, noted in a puff piece in the Nikkei that it would move up the release of its next Mid-Term (Three Year) Plan (normally due in May this year), and it would focus on growing direct sales in China through more stores, growing sales in the US through adding products to the list (currently the major product in North America is skiwear), selling LeCoq Sportif in Indonesia and Munsingwear in Vietnam. WHEN is unknown, but the explicit goal is to encourage shareholders to keep their shares rather than tender them to Itochu.

Today saw a new filing from Itochu in which it amended its original announcement, claimed Descente’s activity in the media was additional and additive to the Target Company Position Statement filed on 7 February, and for that reason, their activity had not been appropriately disclosed to shareholders. Furthermore, Itochu noted that while the jibber-jabber had been going on the last two-plus weeks, Descente had asked Itochu to negotiate post-Tender management structure plans, and Itochu had agreed. Itochu and Descente talked for 9 days from 11-20 Feb but Descente was bad-mouthing Itochu in the press at the same time. That induced Itochu to stop talks. And late today, the Nikkei has released a 27 February interview with the CEO of ANTA, Itochu’s longtime textile partner in China and a 6.86% holder of Descente shares, where he says that he supports Itochu’s tender offer, will not sell their shares in Descente, and would support Itochu efforts to restructure management. 

These three new developments change things in interesting ways, in my opinion pushing Descente’s own plans closer to Itochu’s, and introducing the possibility of significantly more hostility to come, with a much higher likelihood Itochu can win the proxy wars to come. 

In-depth analysis below the fold.

Previous insights on the situation and its runup are listed below.

5. China Housing: City Picks For The Near-Term Cyclical Upside

Based on our CityScreener(TM) methodology using house price, sales volumes, land sales and new starts metrics, we highlight the major cities in China where we believe the housing markets (new home sales) either enjoy a strong sustained momentum or have a potential cyclical upside relative to other cities. 

In this briefing:

1. Global Bottoming Process Continues; Remain Overweight China
2. Tesla – Truth and Consequences
3. Descente Descended and Itochu Angle Is More Hostile
4. China Housing: City Picks For The Near-Term Cyclical Upside
5. China Risun (中国旭阳) IPO Quick Note: Past the Peak of Coking Cycle

1. Global Bottoming Process Continues; Remain Overweight China

The MSCI ACWI and ACWI ex-US have managed to break above their respective 200-day moving averages, and are now bumping up against overhead resistance.  Supportive of a bottoming global market, cyclical Sectors are emerging as leadership. We examine the technical state of major developed and EM markets and highlight in today’s report and highlight attractive and actionable stocks within the Materials, Manufacturing, and Technology sectors.

2. Tesla – Truth and Consequences

Tesla’s problems aren’t going away, they’re escalating:

• Elon Musk is in trouble again with the SEC;
• Tesla’s brand-new general counsel is leaving after just two months on the job;

• Consumer Reports withdrew its recommendation on the flagship Model 3 due to serious quality and reliability concerns–not actually surprising given increasing risks I have tracked  with Tesla quality controls curtailed and flawed cars increasingly delivered to customers (see “Musk and Weird Q3 Developments Are Driving Investors to Telsa’s Rivals” and “Tesla – Dave’s Not Here, and Musk Won’t Leave” and “Tesla: Down to the Wire”).

• The 2018 10-K filing confirms Tesla’s operations still are not generating consistently sustainable profits or cash flow unvarnished by substantial boosts from accounting maneuvers and unusual items as seen with the “miracle” third quarter (see “Great Magic Trick Tesla; Now Do it Again“)
• Which is bad news for first quarter results already foundering with pricing cuts, rising costs, unhappy customers, and escalating demand pressure;
• Plus liquidity strain worsened by $920 million in cash due to go out on March 1st to pay off maturing convertible bonds.
• Tesla Shanghai Gigafactory construction is underway and yet still not fully funded after at least six months of negotiations with bankers, and thus may also be developing differently versus what Tesla has presented (adding to my previously noted concerns in “Tesla – Shanghai Surprise“).

The common theme here is that all these problems were preventable, avoidable, and unnecessary. 

That’s not going away any time soon–as long as Musk remains in complete control.

How long will that be? 

Good question–Read on as Bond Angle analysis continues.

3. Descente Descended and Itochu Angle Is More Hostile

Descente Ltd (8114 JP) has been in the press quite a bit in recent days with management commentary about how the company and directors disagree with the Tender Offer launched by Itochu Corp (8001 JP) to raise their stake from 30% to 40% and how it could lead to conflict of interest and worsening management, lower morale for employees, and a loss of independence.

Management, former management, and former employees have all joined the party. Wednesday saw a significant sell-down of shares to a post-Tender Offer low, but it was not clear why.

Descente had, on the 26th, noted in a puff piece in the Nikkei that it would move up the release of its next Mid-Term (Three Year) Plan (normally due in May this year), and it would focus on growing direct sales in China through more stores, growing sales in the US through adding products to the list (currently the major product in North America is skiwear), selling LeCoq Sportif in Indonesia and Munsingwear in Vietnam. WHEN is unknown, but the explicit goal is to encourage shareholders to keep their shares rather than tender them to Itochu.

Today saw a new filing from Itochu in which it amended its original announcement, claimed Descente’s activity in the media was additional and additive to the Target Company Position Statement filed on 7 February, and for that reason, their activity had not been appropriately disclosed to shareholders. Furthermore, Itochu noted that while the jibber-jabber had been going on the last two-plus weeks, Descente had asked Itochu to negotiate post-Tender management structure plans, and Itochu had agreed. Itochu and Descente talked for 9 days from 11-20 Feb but Descente was bad-mouthing Itochu in the press at the same time. That induced Itochu to stop talks. And late today, the Nikkei has released a 27 February interview with the CEO of ANTA, Itochu’s longtime textile partner in China and a 6.86% holder of Descente shares, where he says that he supports Itochu’s tender offer, will not sell their shares in Descente, and would support Itochu efforts to restructure management. 

These three new developments change things in interesting ways, in my opinion pushing Descente’s own plans closer to Itochu’s, and introducing the possibility of significantly more hostility to come, with a much higher likelihood Itochu can win the proxy wars to come. 

In-depth analysis below the fold.

Previous insights on the situation and its runup are listed below.

4. China Housing: City Picks For The Near-Term Cyclical Upside

Based on our CityScreener(TM) methodology using house price, sales volumes, land sales and new starts metrics, we highlight the major cities in China where we believe the housing markets (new home sales) either enjoy a strong sustained momentum or have a potential cyclical upside relative to other cities. 

5. China Risun (中国旭阳) IPO Quick Note: Past the Peak of Coking Cycle

China Risun, a leading coking coal refining player in China, is seeking up to USD 243 million via a listing in Hong Kong. In this insight, we will discuss the following topics:

• Company’s business and the value chain of coking coal
• Industry backdrop of the coking coal processing industry in China
• Shareholders and investors
• Thoughts on valuation

In this briefing:

1. Tesla – Truth and Consequences
2. Descente Descended and Itochu Angle Is More Hostile
3. China Housing: City Picks For The Near-Term Cyclical Upside
4. China Risun (中国旭阳) IPO Quick Note: Past the Peak of Coking Cycle
5. China Housing: Early Indicators For Sales Volumes In 2019

1. Tesla – Truth and Consequences

Tesla’s problems aren’t going away, they’re escalating:

• Elon Musk is in trouble again with the SEC;
• Tesla’s brand-new general counsel is leaving after just two months on the job;

• Consumer Reports withdrew its recommendation on the flagship Model 3 due to serious quality and reliability concerns–not actually surprising given increasing risks I have tracked  with Tesla quality controls curtailed and flawed cars increasingly delivered to customers (see “Musk and Weird Q3 Developments Are Driving Investors to Telsa’s Rivals” and “Tesla – Dave’s Not Here, and Musk Won’t Leave” and “Tesla: Down to the Wire”).

• The 2018 10-K filing confirms Tesla’s operations still are not generating consistently sustainable profits or cash flow unvarnished by substantial boosts from accounting maneuvers and unusual items as seen with the “miracle” third quarter (see “Great Magic Trick Tesla; Now Do it Again“)
• Which is bad news for first quarter results already foundering with pricing cuts, rising costs, unhappy customers, and escalating demand pressure;
• Plus liquidity strain worsened by $920 million in cash due to go out on March 1st to pay off maturing convertible bonds.
• Tesla Shanghai Gigafactory construction is underway and yet still not fully funded after at least six months of negotiations with bankers, and thus may also be developing differently versus what Tesla has presented (adding to my previously noted concerns in “Tesla – Shanghai Surprise“).

The common theme here is that all these problems were preventable, avoidable, and unnecessary. 

That’s not going away any time soon–as long as Musk remains in complete control.

How long will that be? 

Good question–Read on as Bond Angle analysis continues.

2. Descente Descended and Itochu Angle Is More Hostile

Descente Ltd (8114 JP) has been in the press quite a bit in recent days with management commentary about how the company and directors disagree with the Tender Offer launched by Itochu Corp (8001 JP) to raise their stake from 30% to 40% and how it could lead to conflict of interest and worsening management, lower morale for employees, and a loss of independence.

Management, former management, and former employees have all joined the party. Wednesday saw a significant sell-down of shares to a post-Tender Offer low, but it was not clear why.

Descente had, on the 26th, noted in a puff piece in the Nikkei that it would move up the release of its next Mid-Term (Three Year) Plan (normally due in May this year), and it would focus on growing direct sales in China through more stores, growing sales in the US through adding products to the list (currently the major product in North America is skiwear), selling LeCoq Sportif in Indonesia and Munsingwear in Vietnam. WHEN is unknown, but the explicit goal is to encourage shareholders to keep their shares rather than tender them to Itochu.

Today saw a new filing from Itochu in which it amended its original announcement, claimed Descente’s activity in the media was additional and additive to the Target Company Position Statement filed on 7 February, and for that reason, their activity had not been appropriately disclosed to shareholders. Furthermore, Itochu noted that while the jibber-jabber had been going on the last two-plus weeks, Descente had asked Itochu to negotiate post-Tender management structure plans, and Itochu had agreed. Itochu and Descente talked for 9 days from 11-20 Feb but Descente was bad-mouthing Itochu in the press at the same time. That induced Itochu to stop talks. And late today, the Nikkei has released a 27 February interview with the CEO of ANTA, Itochu’s longtime textile partner in China and a 6.86% holder of Descente shares, where he says that he supports Itochu’s tender offer, will not sell their shares in Descente, and would support Itochu efforts to restructure management. 

These three new developments change things in interesting ways, in my opinion pushing Descente’s own plans closer to Itochu’s, and introducing the possibility of significantly more hostility to come, with a much higher likelihood Itochu can win the proxy wars to come. 

In-depth analysis below the fold.

Previous insights on the situation and its runup are listed below.

3. China Housing: City Picks For The Near-Term Cyclical Upside

Based on our CityScreener(TM) methodology using house price, sales volumes, land sales and new starts metrics, we highlight the major cities in China where we believe the housing markets (new home sales) either enjoy a strong sustained momentum or have a potential cyclical upside relative to other cities. 

4. China Risun (中国旭阳) IPO Quick Note: Past the Peak of Coking Cycle

China Risun, a leading coking coal refining player in China, is seeking up to USD 243 million via a listing in Hong Kong. In this insight, we will discuss the following topics:

• Company’s business and the value chain of coking coal
• Industry backdrop of the coking coal processing industry in China
• Shareholders and investors
• Thoughts on valuation

5. China Housing: Early Indicators For Sales Volumes In 2019

China housing markets start 2019 off a record high base in 2018 in terms of new home sales volumes. With the official NBS January-February data at the national level only expected to be published mid-March, we take a brief look at the early indicators for January-February in the weekly data to February 24 and January data for some major cities and average contract sales for select developers.

In this briefing:

1. China Housing: City Picks For The Near-Term Cyclical Upside
2. China Risun (中国旭阳) IPO Quick Note: Past the Peak of Coking Cycle
3. China Housing: Early Indicators For Sales Volumes In 2019
4. Memory Chips and the Elasticity Myth
5. Dexin China (德信中国) Post IPO – Poor Trading Liquidity, Top Ten Placees Hold 76% of IPO Shares

1. China Housing: City Picks For The Near-Term Cyclical Upside

Based on our CityScreener(TM) methodology using house price, sales volumes, land sales and new starts metrics, we highlight the major cities in China where we believe the housing markets (new home sales) either enjoy a strong sustained momentum or have a potential cyclical upside relative to other cities. 

2. China Risun (中国旭阳) IPO Quick Note: Past the Peak of Coking Cycle

China Risun, a leading coking coal refining player in China, is seeking up to USD 243 million via a listing in Hong Kong. In this insight, we will discuss the following topics:

• Company’s business and the value chain of coking coal
• Industry backdrop of the coking coal processing industry in China
• Shareholders and investors
• Thoughts on valuation

3. China Housing: Early Indicators For Sales Volumes In 2019

China housing markets start 2019 off a record high base in 2018 in terms of new home sales volumes. With the official NBS January-February data at the national level only expected to be published mid-March, we take a brief look at the early indicators for January-February in the weekly data to February 24 and January data for some major cities and average contract sales for select developers.

4. Memory Chips and the Elasticity Myth

During recent earnings calls memory chip makers have postulated that the market will return to higher margins once price elasticity causes demand to increase.  This popular myth needs to be treated with great skepticism since, as this Insight will reveal, short-term price elasticity has a negligible impact upon memory chip sales if it has any impact at all.

5. Dexin China (德信中国) Post IPO – Poor Trading Liquidity, Top Ten Placees Hold 76% of IPO Shares

Dexin China Holdings (2019 HK) raised US$189m in at HK$2.80 per share, at the mid-point of its IPO price range. We have previously covered the IPO in:

• Dexin China (德信中国) Pre-IPO – Related Party Transactions and Partial Asset Listing
• Dexin China (德信中国) IPO Review – Key Issues Remain but 9M Results Showed Strong Growth.

In this insight, we will update on the deal dynamics, implied valuation, and include a valuation sensitivity table.

In this briefing:

1. China Risun (中国旭阳) IPO Quick Note: Past the Peak of Coking Cycle
2. China Housing: Early Indicators For Sales Volumes In 2019
3. Memory Chips and the Elasticity Myth
4. Dexin China (德信中国) Post IPO – Poor Trading Liquidity, Top Ten Placees Hold 76% of IPO Shares
5. Precipitous Deceleration Implies 2019 Is a Year of Stress, Despite Help from US$ Weakness

1. China Risun (中国旭阳) IPO Quick Note: Past the Peak of Coking Cycle

China Risun, a leading coking coal refining player in China, is seeking up to USD 243 million via a listing in Hong Kong. In this insight, we will discuss the following topics:

• Company’s business and the value chain of coking coal
• Industry backdrop of the coking coal processing industry in China
• Shareholders and investors
• Thoughts on valuation

2. China Housing: Early Indicators For Sales Volumes In 2019

China housing markets start 2019 off a record high base in 2018 in terms of new home sales volumes. With the official NBS January-February data at the national level only expected to be published mid-March, we take a brief look at the early indicators for January-February in the weekly data to February 24 and January data for some major cities and average contract sales for select developers.

3. Memory Chips and the Elasticity Myth

During recent earnings calls memory chip makers have postulated that the market will return to higher margins once price elasticity causes demand to increase.  This popular myth needs to be treated with great skepticism since, as this Insight will reveal, short-term price elasticity has a negligible impact upon memory chip sales if it has any impact at all.

4. Dexin China (德信中国) Post IPO – Poor Trading Liquidity, Top Ten Placees Hold 76% of IPO Shares

Dexin China Holdings (2019 HK) raised US$189m in at HK$2.80 per share, at the mid-point of its IPO price range. We have previously covered the IPO in:

• Dexin China (德信中国) Pre-IPO – Related Party Transactions and Partial Asset Listing
• Dexin China (德信中国) IPO Review – Key Issues Remain but 9M Results Showed Strong Growth.

In this insight, we will update on the deal dynamics, implied valuation, and include a valuation sensitivity table.

5. Precipitous Deceleration Implies 2019 Is a Year of Stress, Despite Help from US$ Weakness

China has won the trade war so far, with China’s exports to the US rising 11.3% YoY in 2018, while its imports from the US rose just 0.7% YoY. For the latest two months (Dec18-Jan19), China’s exports to the US declined 3% YoY, but its imports from the US declined a precipitous 38.5% YoY. (The logic is obvious: less than half of China’s exports to the US carry tariffs, while over 80% of US exports to China must pay large import tariffs). Luckily for China, US President Trump has still allowed the March 1st deadline to be extended. That, combined with a weak US$ (and a far more dovish US Federal Reserve than 3 months ago) have taken pressure off the stressed Chinese economy. That any US-China trade deal will result in a stronger RMB takes further pressure off China, which otherwise saw net capital and services/income outflows of US$105bn in Nov18-Jan19 even amid the weakening of the US$ (numbers that would have been worse if the US$ had stayed strong, inducing larger capital outflows). 

The stress is most evident in domestic demand, with China’s imports down 4.5% YoY in the latest two months. China’s car sales declined 6% YoY in 2018, the first yearly decline since 1990, with car sales down 16.7% YoY in 4Q 2018 and down 19% YoY in December, with Chinese car brands’ sales declining 22% YoY in January 2019 (while total passenger car sales fell 17.7% YoY). This was a climactic reversal, as China’s car output had grown 20-fold between 1995 and 2017. The PBOC has responded with 350bp of cuts in banks’ RRR (to 13.5% by , from 17% a year ago), in a move to boost the money-multiplier (but with a modest impact on M2 and loan growth). 

China’s total social financing (TSF) rose by a record RMB4.64tn in January 2019, betraying signs that policy makers were panicking, hence turning on the shadow lending taps anew. Although TSF rose less in 2018 than in either 2016 or 2017, it rose more in 2H 2018 than in 2H 2017, responding to the monetary easing in 2H 2018. Despite a year of persistent and aggressive monetary easing, China’s M2 had grown a modest 8.1% YoY in 2018, up only marginally from 8% YoY at the end of October and November 2018; in January 2019, M2 accelerated to 8.4% YoY growth in response to the latest RRR cuts. FAI (fixed asset investment) slumped to just 2.5% YoY growth in May and July 2018, but then rebounded in the rest of 2018 (growing 5.9% YoY for the whole year). Opening the spigot of shadow lending involves the last throw of the dice: Premier Li Keqiang is among leading critics of this policy approach. For now, both the possibility of a trade deal and the weakness of the US$ are near-term positives that will buoy China. But the only remaining factor consistently buoying China’s growth is exports: so China will perforce need to make significant concessions in the final trade negotiations. If it does not, the positive scenario will rapidly deteriorate, and China’s high-wire act will collapse.  We are cautiously bullish on China in the near-term (3-month horizon), but remain negative on a longer-term (9 months and longer) view. 

In this briefing:

1. China Housing: Early Indicators For Sales Volumes In 2019
2. Memory Chips and the Elasticity Myth
3. Dexin China (德信中国) Post IPO – Poor Trading Liquidity, Top Ten Placees Hold 76% of IPO Shares
4. Precipitous Deceleration Implies 2019 Is a Year of Stress, Despite Help from US$ Weakness
5. Nexon M&A: Amazon & Comcast Enter the Race – It Ain’t Over Till Its Over!

1. China Housing: Early Indicators For Sales Volumes In 2019

China housing markets start 2019 off a record high base in 2018 in terms of new home sales volumes. With the official NBS January-February data at the national level only expected to be published mid-March, we take a brief look at the early indicators for January-February in the weekly data to February 24 and January data for some major cities and average contract sales for select developers.

2. Memory Chips and the Elasticity Myth

During recent earnings calls memory chip makers have postulated that the market will return to higher margins once price elasticity causes demand to increase.  This popular myth needs to be treated with great skepticism since, as this Insight will reveal, short-term price elasticity has a negligible impact upon memory chip sales if it has any impact at all.

3. Dexin China (德信中国) Post IPO – Poor Trading Liquidity, Top Ten Placees Hold 76% of IPO Shares

Dexin China Holdings (2019 HK) raised US$189m in at HK$2.80 per share, at the mid-point of its IPO price range. We have previously covered the IPO in:

• Dexin China (德信中国) Pre-IPO – Related Party Transactions and Partial Asset Listing
• Dexin China (德信中国) IPO Review – Key Issues Remain but 9M Results Showed Strong Growth.

In this insight, we will update on the deal dynamics, implied valuation, and include a valuation sensitivity table.

4. Precipitous Deceleration Implies 2019 Is a Year of Stress, Despite Help from US$ Weakness

China has won the trade war so far, with China’s exports to the US rising 11.3% YoY in 2018, while its imports from the US rose just 0.7% YoY. For the latest two months (Dec18-Jan19), China’s exports to the US declined 3% YoY, but its imports from the US declined a precipitous 38.5% YoY. (The logic is obvious: less than half of China’s exports to the US carry tariffs, while over 80% of US exports to China must pay large import tariffs). Luckily for China, US President Trump has still allowed the March 1st deadline to be extended. That, combined with a weak US$ (and a far more dovish US Federal Reserve than 3 months ago) have taken pressure off the stressed Chinese economy. That any US-China trade deal will result in a stronger RMB takes further pressure off China, which otherwise saw net capital and services/income outflows of US$105bn in Nov18-Jan19 even amid the weakening of the US$ (numbers that would have been worse if the US$ had stayed strong, inducing larger capital outflows). 

The stress is most evident in domestic demand, with China’s imports down 4.5% YoY in the latest two months. China’s car sales declined 6% YoY in 2018, the first yearly decline since 1990, with car sales down 16.7% YoY in 4Q 2018 and down 19% YoY in December, with Chinese car brands’ sales declining 22% YoY in January 2019 (while total passenger car sales fell 17.7% YoY). This was a climactic reversal, as China’s car output had grown 20-fold between 1995 and 2017. The PBOC has responded with 350bp of cuts in banks’ RRR (to 13.5% by , from 17% a year ago), in a move to boost the money-multiplier (but with a modest impact on M2 and loan growth). 

China’s total social financing (TSF) rose by a record RMB4.64tn in January 2019, betraying signs that policy makers were panicking, hence turning on the shadow lending taps anew. Although TSF rose less in 2018 than in either 2016 or 2017, it rose more in 2H 2018 than in 2H 2017, responding to the monetary easing in 2H 2018. Despite a year of persistent and aggressive monetary easing, China’s M2 had grown a modest 8.1% YoY in 2018, up only marginally from 8% YoY at the end of October and November 2018; in January 2019, M2 accelerated to 8.4% YoY growth in response to the latest RRR cuts. FAI (fixed asset investment) slumped to just 2.5% YoY growth in May and July 2018, but then rebounded in the rest of 2018 (growing 5.9% YoY for the whole year). Opening the spigot of shadow lending involves the last throw of the dice: Premier Li Keqiang is among leading critics of this policy approach. For now, both the possibility of a trade deal and the weakness of the US$ are near-term positives that will buoy China. But the only remaining factor consistently buoying China’s growth is exports: so China will perforce need to make significant concessions in the final trade negotiations. If it does not, the positive scenario will rapidly deteriorate, and China’s high-wire act will collapse.  We are cautiously bullish on China in the near-term (3-month horizon), but remain negative on a longer-term (9 months and longer) view. 

5. Nexon M&A: Amazon & Comcast Enter the Race – It Ain’t Over Till Its Over!

In a surprising move, it was reported after the market close today that Amazon.com Inc (AMZN US) (market cap of US$804 billion) and Comcast (US$176 billion) will enter the race and have submitted initial bids to acquire Nexon Co Ltd (3659 JP)/NXC Corp. 

The entrance of Amazon and Comcast is a major positive surprise and it should have a strong positive impact on Nexon’s share price. Prior to the entrance of Amazon and Comcast in this M&A battle, the market was firmly leaning towards the consortium including Tencent, Netmarble Games, and MBK Partners to acquire NXC Corp/Nexon.

Now, Amazon and Comcast’s entrance into this M&A battle has made it a lot more exciting and uncertain. Nexon Co Ltd (3659 JP)‘s share price is up 19% YTD but its share price trend has been flattening out in February. In the next few weeks, we expect further boost to Nexon’s share price (15%+), mainly because a lot more investors will think that the Tencent consortium, Amazon, and Comcast will try to pay higher price to acquire NXC Corp/Nexon. Kudos to Nexon shareholders!

In this briefing:

1. Memory Chips and the Elasticity Myth
2. Dexin China (德信中国) Post IPO – Poor Trading Liquidity, Top Ten Placees Hold 76% of IPO Shares
3. Precipitous Deceleration Implies 2019 Is a Year of Stress, Despite Help from US$ Weakness
4. Nexon M&A: Amazon & Comcast Enter the Race – It Ain’t Over Till Its Over!
5. Hong Kong’s Growth Mirage

1. Memory Chips and the Elasticity Myth

During recent earnings calls memory chip makers have postulated that the market will return to higher margins once price elasticity causes demand to increase.  This popular myth needs to be treated with great skepticism since, as this Insight will reveal, short-term price elasticity has a negligible impact upon memory chip sales if it has any impact at all.

2. Dexin China (德信中国) Post IPO – Poor Trading Liquidity, Top Ten Placees Hold 76% of IPO Shares

Dexin China Holdings (2019 HK) raised US$189m in at HK$2.80 per share, at the mid-point of its IPO price range. We have previously covered the IPO in:

• Dexin China (德信中国) Pre-IPO – Related Party Transactions and Partial Asset Listing
• Dexin China (德信中国) IPO Review – Key Issues Remain but 9M Results Showed Strong Growth.

In this insight, we will update on the deal dynamics, implied valuation, and include a valuation sensitivity table.

3. Precipitous Deceleration Implies 2019 Is a Year of Stress, Despite Help from US$ Weakness

China has won the trade war so far, with China’s exports to the US rising 11.3% YoY in 2018, while its imports from the US rose just 0.7% YoY. For the latest two months (Dec18-Jan19), China’s exports to the US declined 3% YoY, but its imports from the US declined a precipitous 38.5% YoY. (The logic is obvious: less than half of China’s exports to the US carry tariffs, while over 80% of US exports to China must pay large import tariffs). Luckily for China, US President Trump has still allowed the March 1st deadline to be extended. That, combined with a weak US$ (and a far more dovish US Federal Reserve than 3 months ago) have taken pressure off the stressed Chinese economy. That any US-China trade deal will result in a stronger RMB takes further pressure off China, which otherwise saw net capital and services/income outflows of US$105bn in Nov18-Jan19 even amid the weakening of the US$ (numbers that would have been worse if the US$ had stayed strong, inducing larger capital outflows). 

The stress is most evident in domestic demand, with China’s imports down 4.5% YoY in the latest two months. China’s car sales declined 6% YoY in 2018, the first yearly decline since 1990, with car sales down 16.7% YoY in 4Q 2018 and down 19% YoY in December, with Chinese car brands’ sales declining 22% YoY in January 2019 (while total passenger car sales fell 17.7% YoY). This was a climactic reversal, as China’s car output had grown 20-fold between 1995 and 2017. The PBOC has responded with 350bp of cuts in banks’ RRR (to 13.5% by , from 17% a year ago), in a move to boost the money-multiplier (but with a modest impact on M2 and loan growth). 

China’s total social financing (TSF) rose by a record RMB4.64tn in January 2019, betraying signs that policy makers were panicking, hence turning on the shadow lending taps anew. Although TSF rose less in 2018 than in either 2016 or 2017, it rose more in 2H 2018 than in 2H 2017, responding to the monetary easing in 2H 2018. Despite a year of persistent and aggressive monetary easing, China’s M2 had grown a modest 8.1% YoY in 2018, up only marginally from 8% YoY at the end of October and November 2018; in January 2019, M2 accelerated to 8.4% YoY growth in response to the latest RRR cuts. FAI (fixed asset investment) slumped to just 2.5% YoY growth in May and July 2018, but then rebounded in the rest of 2018 (growing 5.9% YoY for the whole year). Opening the spigot of shadow lending involves the last throw of the dice: Premier Li Keqiang is among leading critics of this policy approach. For now, both the possibility of a trade deal and the weakness of the US$ are near-term positives that will buoy China. But the only remaining factor consistently buoying China’s growth is exports: so China will perforce need to make significant concessions in the final trade negotiations. If it does not, the positive scenario will rapidly deteriorate, and China’s high-wire act will collapse.  We are cautiously bullish on China in the near-term (3-month horizon), but remain negative on a longer-term (9 months and longer) view. 

4. Nexon M&A: Amazon & Comcast Enter the Race – It Ain’t Over Till Its Over!

In a surprising move, it was reported after the market close today that Amazon.com Inc (AMZN US) (market cap of US$804 billion) and Comcast (US$176 billion) will enter the race and have submitted initial bids to acquire Nexon Co Ltd (3659 JP)/NXC Corp. 

The entrance of Amazon and Comcast is a major positive surprise and it should have a strong positive impact on Nexon’s share price. Prior to the entrance of Amazon and Comcast in this M&A battle, the market was firmly leaning towards the consortium including Tencent, Netmarble Games, and MBK Partners to acquire NXC Corp/Nexon.

Now, Amazon and Comcast’s entrance into this M&A battle has made it a lot more exciting and uncertain. Nexon Co Ltd (3659 JP)‘s share price is up 19% YTD but its share price trend has been flattening out in February. In the next few weeks, we expect further boost to Nexon’s share price (15%+), mainly because a lot more investors will think that the Tencent consortium, Amazon, and Comcast will try to pay higher price to acquire NXC Corp/Nexon. Kudos to Nexon shareholders!

5. Hong Kong’s Growth Mirage

It may not feel like it. It may not smell like it. But make no mistake Hong Kong is in recession. We are underweight in our relative regional equity portfolio.  The only positives are that the real cost of lending is easing (which might bring some relief to mortgage owners) and Hong Kong corporate balance sheets are in good shape to weather the current downturn. But the negative overwhelm these positives.

In this briefing:

1. Dexin China (德信中国) Post IPO – Poor Trading Liquidity, Top Ten Placees Hold 76% of IPO Shares
2. Precipitous Deceleration Implies 2019 Is a Year of Stress, Despite Help from US$ Weakness
3. Nexon M&A: Amazon & Comcast Enter the Race – It Ain’t Over Till Its Over!
4. Hong Kong’s Growth Mirage
5. Amidst Sino-US Economic Uncertainty…US Ponders Plaza-Style Accord on Trade Dispute

1. Dexin China (德信中国) Post IPO – Poor Trading Liquidity, Top Ten Placees Hold 76% of IPO Shares

Dexin China Holdings (2019 HK) raised US$189m in at HK$2.80 per share, at the mid-point of its IPO price range. We have previously covered the IPO in:

• Dexin China (德信中国) Pre-IPO – Related Party Transactions and Partial Asset Listing
• Dexin China (德信中国) IPO Review – Key Issues Remain but 9M Results Showed Strong Growth.

In this insight, we will update on the deal dynamics, implied valuation, and include a valuation sensitivity table.

2. Precipitous Deceleration Implies 2019 Is a Year of Stress, Despite Help from US$ Weakness

China has won the trade war so far, with China’s exports to the US rising 11.3% YoY in 2018, while its imports from the US rose just 0.7% YoY. For the latest two months (Dec18-Jan19), China’s exports to the US declined 3% YoY, but its imports from the US declined a precipitous 38.5% YoY. (The logic is obvious: less than half of China’s exports to the US carry tariffs, while over 80% of US exports to China must pay large import tariffs). Luckily for China, US President Trump has still allowed the March 1st deadline to be extended. That, combined with a weak US$ (and a far more dovish US Federal Reserve than 3 months ago) have taken pressure off the stressed Chinese economy. That any US-China trade deal will result in a stronger RMB takes further pressure off China, which otherwise saw net capital and services/income outflows of US$105bn in Nov18-Jan19 even amid the weakening of the US$ (numbers that would have been worse if the US$ had stayed strong, inducing larger capital outflows). 

The stress is most evident in domestic demand, with China’s imports down 4.5% YoY in the latest two months. China’s car sales declined 6% YoY in 2018, the first yearly decline since 1990, with car sales down 16.7% YoY in 4Q 2018 and down 19% YoY in December, with Chinese car brands’ sales declining 22% YoY in January 2019 (while total passenger car sales fell 17.7% YoY). This was a climactic reversal, as China’s car output had grown 20-fold between 1995 and 2017. The PBOC has responded with 350bp of cuts in banks’ RRR (to 13.5% by , from 17% a year ago), in a move to boost the money-multiplier (but with a modest impact on M2 and loan growth). 

China’s total social financing (TSF) rose by a record RMB4.64tn in January 2019, betraying signs that policy makers were panicking, hence turning on the shadow lending taps anew. Although TSF rose less in 2018 than in either 2016 or 2017, it rose more in 2H 2018 than in 2H 2017, responding to the monetary easing in 2H 2018. Despite a year of persistent and aggressive monetary easing, China’s M2 had grown a modest 8.1% YoY in 2018, up only marginally from 8% YoY at the end of October and November 2018; in January 2019, M2 accelerated to 8.4% YoY growth in response to the latest RRR cuts. FAI (fixed asset investment) slumped to just 2.5% YoY growth in May and July 2018, but then rebounded in the rest of 2018 (growing 5.9% YoY for the whole year). Opening the spigot of shadow lending involves the last throw of the dice: Premier Li Keqiang is among leading critics of this policy approach. For now, both the possibility of a trade deal and the weakness of the US$ are near-term positives that will buoy China. But the only remaining factor consistently buoying China’s growth is exports: so China will perforce need to make significant concessions in the final trade negotiations. If it does not, the positive scenario will rapidly deteriorate, and China’s high-wire act will collapse.  We are cautiously bullish on China in the near-term (3-month horizon), but remain negative on a longer-term (9 months and longer) view. 

3. Nexon M&A: Amazon & Comcast Enter the Race – It Ain’t Over Till Its Over!

In a surprising move, it was reported after the market close today that Amazon.com Inc (AMZN US) (market cap of US$804 billion) and Comcast (US$176 billion) will enter the race and have submitted initial bids to acquire Nexon Co Ltd (3659 JP)/NXC Corp. 

The entrance of Amazon and Comcast is a major positive surprise and it should have a strong positive impact on Nexon’s share price. Prior to the entrance of Amazon and Comcast in this M&A battle, the market was firmly leaning towards the consortium including Tencent, Netmarble Games, and MBK Partners to acquire NXC Corp/Nexon.

Now, Amazon and Comcast’s entrance into this M&A battle has made it a lot more exciting and uncertain. Nexon Co Ltd (3659 JP)‘s share price is up 19% YTD but its share price trend has been flattening out in February. In the next few weeks, we expect further boost to Nexon’s share price (15%+), mainly because a lot more investors will think that the Tencent consortium, Amazon, and Comcast will try to pay higher price to acquire NXC Corp/Nexon. Kudos to Nexon shareholders!

4. Hong Kong’s Growth Mirage

It may not feel like it. It may not smell like it. But make no mistake Hong Kong is in recession. We are underweight in our relative regional equity portfolio.  The only positives are that the real cost of lending is easing (which might bring some relief to mortgage owners) and Hong Kong corporate balance sheets are in good shape to weather the current downturn. But the negative overwhelm these positives.

5. Amidst Sino-US Economic Uncertainty…US Ponders Plaza-Style Accord on Trade Dispute

Successful resolution of geopolitical issues pertaining to China’s continued integration into the world economy remains crucial for global corporate profit expectations and risky assets.

Uncertainty about the US economic outlook has increased in recent weeks as testified by falling corporate profit growth expectations, while the recent government shutdown has delayed the release of crucial data required for monetary policy formulation.

China’s economy continues to decelerate, as testified by slowing big ticket activity, but record monthly credit growth in January indicates how the fallout from the US trade dispute has diverted attention away from lowering excessive leverage in the economy, as well as rising bond defaults. 

The US will insist that currency devaluation by China cannot be deployed under any Sino-US trade dispute resolution, but this will reduce China’s sovereignty over discretionary monetary policy conduct.

Meanwhile, rumours are circulating that the US wants to impose a Plaza Accord style memorandum for China to be committed to an orderly appreciation of the yuan as part of any trade dispute resolution, but China will be wary of the fate that befell Japan after 1985 following the Plaza agreement.

In this briefing:

1. AIG Sells PICC: A Clean-Up Trade Cum Liquidity Event
2. Autohome (ATHM): Promising Auto Loan, Waiting for Buying Opportunity
3. Futu Holdings IPO – Given the Team, Execution, and Backers, Might Be Worth a Look at the Low-End
4. Diageo Proposes Another Partial Tender for Sichuan Swellfun
5. China Tobacco Intl (HK) IPO: Proxy For the Chinese Cigarette Consumption

1. AIG Sells PICC: A Clean-Up Trade Cum Liquidity Event

AIG is selling its USD 450 million stakes in PICC today after market close. The deal scores negatively in our ECM Framework. 

We like the fact that it will increase the free-float significantly and hence there will be a liquidity event, meanwhile, we are also concerned that the deal size is large compared to its liquidity.

2. Autohome (ATHM): Promising Auto Loan, Waiting for Buying Opportunity

• The 4Q2018 results suggest that it is a right decision to close out direct automobile sales and start auto loan.
• The 4Q2018 results also suggest that ATHM has successfully completed the post-acquisition integration after three years.
• Peer companies’P/E ratios suggest ATHM is fairly valued, but we believe it will be a good opportunity to accumulate if the stock price falls.

3. Futu Holdings IPO – Given the Team, Execution, and Backers, Might Be Worth a Look at the Low-End

Futu Holdings Ltd (FHL US) plans to raise upto US$130m in its US listing. The deal has been downsized from its earlier indicative size of US$300m and the valuation too has been downsized by almost the same extent to around US$1.2-1.5bn.

In my earlier insights, Futu Holdings Pre-IPO – Great Metrics but in a Commoditised Industry and Futu Holdings Pre-IPO – FY18 Updates And Quick Thoughts on Valuation, I looked at the company’s background and past financial performance.

 In this insight, I’ll run the deal through our IPO framework and comment on valuations. At the low-end the deal might be worth looking into, although free-float might end up being very small owing to US$30m being taken up Tencent which would leave just about US$100m as free-float.

4. Diageo Proposes Another Partial Tender for Sichuan Swellfun

UK alcoholic drinks conglomerate Diageo Plc (DGE LN) bought a stake in Sichuan Swellfun Co Ltd A (600779 CH) in 2007, then through a 49% stake in Sichuan Chengdu Quanxing Group which owned ~40% of the Chinese baiju maker. In 2011 Diageo raised its stake in Sichuan Chengdu Quanxing Group from 49% to 53% by paying US$21mm to Chengdu Yingsheng Investment Holding Co. which lowered its stake to 47%.

In 2013, Diageo spent £233m to buy out Chengdu Yingsheng Investment Holding Co.’s 47% to go from a consolidated 21.05% to 39.71% in Swellfun (which is also named Sichuan Shui Jing Fang, after one of its brands).

Last summer, Diageo offered to buy 20.29% of the shares outstanding in a Partial Tender Offer (PTO) which was announced June 25th leading to a brief pop to RMB 60.0, and then launched a few weeks later at RMB 62.00 a share, which was a 22.6% premium to the then-current share price. The shares paid a RMB 0.62 dividend on August 1st and the PTO price was lowered to RMB 61.38 accordingly.

Last year’s Partial Tender was for 99,127,820 shares to be acquired out of a total free-float of 294,546,100 shares, which gave a minimum pro-ration of 36.65%. Surprisingly, pro-ration ended up being quite low at ~40.1%. The shares fell sharply and buy-and-tender trades done at the low were OK but in the mid 50s were not.

The shares languished as the economy softened, real estate transactions slowed, and conspicuous consumption continued to be frowned upon, and buy-and-tender-and-own-back-end trades did not do well (though owning A-shares in general did not do well either) as the shares troughed at less than half the tender offer price.

The New News

On 26 February 2019, Diageo announced it had approached the board of directors of Sichuan Swellfun with a proposal to increase its stake from 60% to 70% at RMB 45.00. This was a 19.33% premium to the last close and a 40.05% premium to the 30-day average.

The proposal was announced on the Shanghai Stock Exchange as well in Chinese.

This deal obviously has a lower minimum pro-ration, and the shares have jumped limit up this morning to RMB 41.48 leaving only 8.49% upside if you can buy at limit up today. At 25% pro-ration, breakeven is RMB 40.31, 6.9% higher than yesterday’s close. Assuming yesterday’s close is The Right Price, today’s limit up would give an implied expected pro-ration of 55%, implying only 18.2% of the remaining 40% of shares outstanding would tender. 

What To Do? 

That is the question. A-shares are on a tear, with the SSE-SZSE 300 up 23% ytd. Historically, bull markets are good to buy. Consensus forecasts have come down so there is a reason why the shares fell to where they did, but even though consensus EPS for 2019 as of six months ago is now the consensus EPS estimate for Dec 2020, on 2019 the shares at the Proposed Tender Offer Price are at less than 30x PER and less than 24x Dec 2020.

If you are buying these to get the minimum pro-ration on a target price equivalent to the offered Tender Offer Price, don’t bother. If you are looking at this as a cheap put because you may decide to downsize your position if the A-share rally sees the brakes applied, this is more interesting.

This is a trader’s trade rather than an arbitrageur’s trade and should be dealt with accordingly.

Breakeven Arb Grids for Price, PER, PBR, EV/EBITDA below.

5. China Tobacco Intl (HK) IPO: Proxy For the Chinese Cigarette Consumption

China Tobacco International (Hong Kong), a subsidiary of the China Tobacco International, is seeking a listing in Hong Kong. Per media reports, the company plans to raise USD 100 million. In this insight, we will discuss the following topics: 

• What does China Tobacco International do?
• What is its relationship with China Tobacco?
• How did its different segments perform?
• The industrial backdrop