The recent negative sales in the Chinese auto industry and Nissan’s case of Carlos Ghosn removal could put additional pressure on the already thin margin of auto supplier industry. One of the Carlos Ghosn early contribution to Nissan was to cut cost and outsource the auto parts maker to a wide variety of suppliers including to Hanon Systems (018880 KS) . Nissan’s new management may want to undo some of Carlos Ghosn’ legacy including changing the selection criteria of parts supplier.
Hanon’s global peers also experienced a decrease in the inventory turnover and most of them have been priced at PER <10 but Hanon is still trading at 24x PER while its sales growth and profitability is still in low single digit? Facing the onset of the slowdown in the Chinese auto industry, won’t it be another headwind for Hanon Systems?
Since our bearish Insight on Tokyo Kiraboshi Financial Group (7173 JP) issued in November 2018, Tokyo Kiraboshi FG (7173 JP): Shooting Star, the stock’s subsequent performance has fully justified our pessimism, with the share price finishing CY2018 down 47.7% year-on-year (YoY). Having touched a low of ¥1,504 on Christmas Day, the shares have recovered 10.1% to ¥1,656 as of Friday’s close: slightly better than the Topix Bank Index, which closed on Friday at 154.44, up 9.0% over the same period. Trading on a forward-looking price/earnings multiple of 12.5x (using the bank’s current FY3/2019 guidance) and a price/book ratio of 0.21x, TKFG looks cheap. This is deceptive. Adjusting the group’s earnings per share (EPS) for the ¥55 billion (US$507 million) in two still-outstanding preference share issues pushes the PER to over 18x: hardly a bargain. Meanwhile, the group’s RoA and RoE ratios are woefully low, loan growth has collapsed since end-March 2018, deposits have fallen alarmingly, and main bank subsidiary Kiraboshi Bank is struggling to keep its net return on funds deployed (NRFD) in positive territory. A stock best avoided.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
Tracking Traffic/Containers & Air Cargo is the hub for all of our research on container shipping and air cargo, featuring analysis of monthly industry data, notes from our conversations with industry participants, and links to recent company and thematic pieces.
Tracking Traffic/Containers & Air Cargo aims to highlight changes to existing trends, relationships, and views affecting the leading Asian companies in these two sectors. This month’s note includes data from about twenty different sources.
In this issue readers will find:
An analysis of December container shipping rates: Our proprietary index suggests average container shipping rates firmed again in December. Firmer rates in Q418, combined with a moderation in fuel prices, probably lifted carrier margins in the period, and this improvement is likely to spill over into Q119.
A look at December air cargo activity, which slumped, again: The five Asia-based airlines we track reported a ~2% Y/Y decline in air cargo handled. After growing by a healthy +6.3% Y/Y in H118, air cargo demand at these five carriers has shown a consistent monthly decline, growing by just 1% in Q418 and shrinking slightly in November and December.
For container carriers and airlines, fuel price increases have continued to moderate. As of mid-January, the price of bunker fuel was up just 4% Y/Y, and the price of jet fuel had declined by around 7%. Throughout much of 2018, fuel prices had risen 20-40% Y/Y, or more.
Japanese carriers’ December quarter earnings on the horizon: We will soon find out whether improving conditions in container shipping showed up in the carriers’ P&Ls, as the three major Japanese shipping companies are set to report December quarter results at the break on January 31.
Although slowing demand growth is unlikely to generate impressive top-line improvements, firmer pricing combined with lower fuel costs should support an ongoing improvement in profitability for container carriers in the near-term. Meanwhile, the slump in air cargo demand has not yet hit air cargo yields, but it’s becoming clearer that an economic slowdown is hurting demand for this relatively expensive mode of transport.
Our thesis on Subaru has maintained for some time that margins were inflated due to under-spending and that these costs would surface in one form or the other over time.
As it turns out, the costs were incurred through recalls as Subaru downgraded its FY OP guidance from ¥300bn to ¥220bn on 5 Nov. What continues to concern us is the constant stream of negative news flow on quality and sustainability-related issues. While the latest announcements do not imply excessive direct costs for the company, they continue to raise the question of whether corners were being cut and thus create doubt about the formerly excellent and still very high OPMs generated by Subaru.
We remain negative on Subaru as we expect margins to remain under pressure and believe top line may stagnate or shrink over the next one to two years.
Osaka official targets Q3 this year for decision on the winning bid, citing a more the merrier attitude on the number of licensee presumptives.
Bidders estimate investment for Osaka at anywhere between US$7bn. TO US$10bn.
Top competitors for Osaka in our view are: MGM Resorts, Galaxy Entertainment Group, Melco Resorts and Entertainment, Las Vegas Sands and Wynn Resorts. Our view: Buy all five at current great entry points.
2018 full results due on the 18th February 2019: Since our initial report on 3rd September 2018, SIQ’s share price has declined some 21% versus the ASX All Ordinaries fall of circa 8%. With results due, we expect the market to refocus on Smartgroup and its good growth story. This is important as much of the focus for the group in the last two years has been on the acquisitions being made. To see management return focus to organic growth, post these acquisitions should help investor confidence in SIQ. Specifically concentrating on the cross-selling of its services whilst benefiting from Australia’s tight labour market and corporates chasing incremental cost savings can only be positives.
Review and upgrade to forecasts: With the benefit of further time to review SIQ’s business progress and the composition of our forecasts, we have increased fiscal 2018 and 2019 EPS forecasts 10% and 12% respectively. Much of our thought process is at the SG&A line, whilst the view that the overall trajectory of earnings remains on track.
2019 we expect to be a year of consolidation, with consistent growth: In the two years to the end of fiscal 2017, SIQ had made six acquisitions. These acquisitions were aimed at both industry consolidation, as well as complementary product build out. We expect 2019 to be a year where the benefits from these acquisitions are exhibited in both the bottom and top-line growth. We expect this even though 2019 may present macro challenges.
We reiterate our view that SIQ offers Growth at a Reasonable price: SIQ’s forward multiples are positive for a company which has posted a long term book value growth rate of circa 7%(net of dividend) and is forecast to post a similar rate 2019 and in 2020. Based on our 2019 EPS forecasts SIQ should be able to deliver circa A$0.62/share, which implies 18% YoY growth and a 13 times P/E.
Multiple news article mentioned SK Hynix’ weak Q4 2018 numbers due to the slowdown in the smartphone markets but the fact remains that:
smartphone is the dominant communication tools
smartphone penetration still has room to grow
current model of smartphone is likely to remain the same for the next foreseeable future
lower end smartphones will likely be the next growth driver
In this report we will discuss the following:
Q4 2018 result
Price action in 2018
Margin comparison with the peers
Exposure to the growing affordable smartphone segment
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
The political decision to exit the European Union has unpredictable negative consequences for both the UK economy and stockmarket. My purpose is to identify a portfolio of UK shorts and occasional longs.
Lloyds Banking: What does it do ?
Lloyds Banking Group is the UK’s largest retail bank with a 20% share of both consumer credit and mortgage lending. It has no investment banking activities or overseas activities.
Why is it in the long portfolio ?
After a 10 year period of rehabilitation post the Financial Crisis the group is now profitable at the statutory level and generating a healthy double return on tangible equity (ROE). This year the consensus expectation is for a dividend of 3.3p per share (+7%) leaving the shares on a yield of 5.7%. In addition management completed a GBP1bn share buyback, the combination of buy-back and divided represents 4.7p per share or an effective yield of 8.1%. If future projections prove correct then the ROE should morph into the mid-teens by 2020. A return at this level should be sufficient to lift the shares well above book value.
What are the risks ?
A key risk is economic dislocation from Brexit. Management believe that EU exit along the lines of the current withdrawal agreement will be compatible with only a marginal increase in credit losses.
The political decision to exit the European Union has unpredictable negative consequences for both the UK economy and stockmarket. My purpose is to identify a portfolio of UK shorts and occasional longs.
Centrica PLC: What does it do ?
Centrica, through its operating subsidiary British gas is the largest of the six major energy supply companies operating in the UK. The core activity, and providing around 70% of revenues, is energy supply to households and businesses in the UK, US and Canada. The group has a 28% share of the home energy market in the UK and 13% of the market in US. In energy supply to businesses, Centrica is the second largest supplier in the US where it claims a 15% market share. Beyond energy supply Centrica has three established business, Services, Trading, and E&P, and two nascent high growth businesses Distributed Energy & Power and Connected Home
Why is it in the short portfolio?
Energy Supply is dominated by regulation and price conscious consumers which has lead management to predict a flat revenue outcome over the long term. Customer numbers are declining, the recently introduced default tariff price cap will eat into revenues, and higher gas prices are unhelpful.
Recognizing the problem management intend to treat Energy Supply as a cash-cow re-investing its cash-flow into the growth businesses. However the available upside from these new ventures may not provide sufficient compensation. More immediately consideration of cash-flow suggests the dividend, currently supporting the shares with a near 9% yield, may not prove sustainable.
We believe that parents of primary school children will bring their children back to tutoring schools when they become aware of the competition in junior high schools.
The expansion of online business and the change towards small classes are improving both the revenue growth and the margins.
We believe that the requirement of educator license is not a concern.
The 5-year P/E band suggests an upside of 44% for the share of TAL Education.
We look at credit metrics of three specialty lenders in the US, for newly announced results. Discover Financial Services (DFS US) mostly provides credit card loans, but additionally it provides student loans and personal loans. The last category is where there is the most deterioration in the just-reported 4Q18 results, and it goes to our concerns about the reported ‘robustness’ of the US economy. The company’s charge off rate in personal loans rose to 4.49% in 4Q18. The figure was 3.62% in 4Q17 and 2.70% in 4Q16. This is considerable deterioration. Even where some of the credit metrics in credit card loans is not as dire, the direction is of concern. All said, perhaps this is one reason that DFS falls into our growing bucket of financial companies with declining QoQ profit in 4Q18? Credit metrics at Sallie Mae and Synchrony Financial, do not leave us sanguine about the US consumer either.
Founded in 1992 and acquired by Mr. Roman Avdeev in 1994,Credit Bank Of Moscow Pjsc (CBOM RM) benefits from an entrenched market position and strong brand recognition in its strategic market of Moscow which represents 25% of Russian GDP. CBM is an established operation in Moscow and the Moscow region with over 7,000 devices in high traffic locations.
CBM has expanded fast, from commanding a mere 0.7% share of system Assets in 2013 to 2.9% today.
The bank has a defined strategy underpinned by blue-chip, large, and medium-sized corporate services (fees, settlements, cash handling); high-margin consumer lending; and investment banking (SOVA Capital synergies, interbank, ECM, DCM, M&A). CBM commands a client-base of 15k corporates: companies represent 87% of loans. The bank has 1.5MM retail customers: accounting for a third of deposits.
In 2015 CBM acquired Inkakhran, swelling its nationwide cash handling market share to 17%. In this segment, CBM commands a client-base of 3k, of which 164 are banks, with 876 armoured vehicles covering 33k collection points.
Management is focused on above-system growth, based on a relatively robust liquid Balance Sheet, reducing funding costs, and enhancing operating efficiency and productivity. 2018 was marked by building up liquidity and strengthening capital adequacy as well as managing Balance Sheet risk -after 5 years of forceful growth- while maintaining profitability and cost efficiencies.
Technology highlights include the Your Bank Online system, MKB Business, and Foreign Exchange Control Dashboard.
Avdeev’s Rossium, a domestic group with interests in agriculture, timber, oil and a pharmacy chain, is the majority shareholder (56%) while the EBRD holds a position which reduces the float (18%). The supervisory board contains 5 out of 10 independent non executives while 2 more are nominees of minority shareholders. Related party lending is 3.5% of the loan book. Rosneft exposure though represents a caveat to CBM and to the system in general though some view this more of a strength.
CBM trades below Book Value, lies on a low Mkt Cap./Deposits rating of 13%, below the global and EM median, and commands an Earnings Yield of 13%. A quintile 1 PH Score™ of 8.0 captures the valuation dynamic while metric change is satisfactory. Combining franchise valuation, technical momentum, and the PH Score™, CBM stands in the top quintile of opportunity globally.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
Krungthai Card (KTC TB) shows all too clearly how to keep profit growth high, rising from 20%, to 33% and to 56%, from 2016 through 2018. There are few financial companies that can compare to the persistent and high and improving rate of profit growth. We must remember that late in 2017, regulations changed lowering the maximum rate on credit card loans and limiting facilities based on a more stringent policy relating to income. Ironically, we believe this supports performance. Customers may have become more careful on defaulting, running the risk of getting cut off and having to re-apply for a personal loan or a credit card. And under new regulations, customers can not receive as high a credit limit as in the past, if their income is less than Bt30,000 or Bt50,000 per month.
In Q2 of FY19, the company has grown at 10.15% with revenue of INR 2.92 bn. EBITDA was INR 0.24 bn and EBITDA margin stood at 8.4% down by 167 bps, Net profit stood at 0.113 bn with margins at 3.87% down by 102 bps. Raw materials cost has increased in the first half of the year leading to lower margins.
The company has acquired 80% in Avadh Snacks, a Gujarat based snacks company for INR1.48 bn, we have discussed the implications in the report.
The stock is currently tradings at its 54x its FY18 EPS (Pre-acquisition) and 42x its FY19 EPS (post-acquisition), we believe the stock is currently overvalued but are positive on the long term prospects of the firm.
Total Access Communication (DTAC TB) recently settled a number of outstanding cases with CAT, one of the two Thai Telecom authorities (the other being TOT). DTAC agreed to pay THB9.5bn ($300m) to CAT to settle a number of outstanding disputes. They did NOT clear all their disputes and there are substantial remaining potential liabilities. In the past, The Thai telcos have tended to ignore these cases given the glacial moves through the system (some are 20+ years), but DTAC’s moves suggest it is time to take a closer look. The total numbers for the industry are substantial at around $20bn and, following DTAC’s settlement, Chris Hoare thinks the risk of crystallizing losses has increased. We have cut our target prices as a result. The industry was already facing headwinds from the business revival at DTAC now that it has secured access to spectrum.
GE’s business reality is far removed from management’s up-beat message. Creative accounting enabled management to line their pockets, while the underlying business deteriorated. A bloated board sanctioned poor disclosure, leasing, restructuring provisions and asset trading that obscured the decline. In FY 2018, we expect underlying Industrial profits of US$3.4bn and unlevered sustainable cashflow of US$5.1bn, down 50%. Change is coming, but it is too little, too late…
The record net losses were mainly due to a seasonally weak quarter and recognition of the impairment in a subsidiary.
Q2 revenues did not slow down and management does not believe Q3 revenues will slow down.
EDU will not be negatively impacted by the new law from the Ministry of Education.
The P/E band suggests an upside of 27% and a price target of USD90.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
We initiate coverage of TPCH with a BUY rating and a 2019E target price of Bt13.0, pegged to 13.0xPE, which is the average valuation of its inexpensive listed peers. In comparison, TPCH is trading below 10x PER in 2019-20E. Given that the investment phase for its biomass power plants is almost over, we expect it to pay a nice dividend yield of 3.3% in 2019E and 6.6% in 2020E.
The story:
Decent growth in 2019-20E
Price contraction has opened an investment opportunity
Poised to be an early leader in the waste-to-energy business
DIGI (DIGI MK) reported a slightly disappointing set of 4Q18 figures, carrying on from 3Q. Service revenue contracted by 2% after growing 0.1% in 3Q. However, the overall margin was slightly better driven by an improved equipment margin, with EBITDA up 2.2% YoY. Underlying (ex-equipment) margins dipped by 80bp. DIGI’s KPIs look in line, with subscribers down by 140k (in line with historic trends) and ARPUs flat sequentially. Data usage continues to grow (now almost 10GB/ month/sub) from already high levels. The dividend was slightly down at 4.8 sen, suggesting dividends might have peaked. Guidance for 2019 is in line with our expectations: flat revenues and low single digit growth in EBITDA on a pre-IFRS basis. We have upgraded DIGI from Reduce to Neutral, the first time in 6 years we have not been Sellers! After five years of price declines and revenue erosion, Malaysian telcos look much closer to global norms now. With DIGI down 30% from its high in early 2015, and with earnings having stabilized we are now comfortable with a neutral rating.
With its nationwide fiber optic network infrastructure, NTT continues to dominate the fixed line broadband market in Japan with 68% market share. In this Insight we explore the fixed line broadband market in Japan today and how it is evolving, especially with the increasing dominance of “collaboration” offerings that bundle fiber with mobile services.
Mobile services are getting a lot of attention today, especially in the run up to 5G launches over the coming 12 months, but without fiber backhaul, 5G would be a nonstarter. In this Insight we investigate what 5G will bring and what is needed to support it as well as the telcos’ latest plans.
NTT is not just an incumbent telecom operator, it’s also a key player for future technologies and provides the physical infrastructure and architecture for many of the industries new services.With all the talk about 5G it is sometimes easy to forget that fixed line networks are still necessary. With NTT’s strong fiber-based network and its collaborations with NTT Docomo and many other partners in mobile and data, we believe NTT is well positioned to be a key and winning player in the evolving telecom and technology space.
Intel‘s fourth quarter 2018 results last week missed on earnings to the tune of $360 million. That, combined with a tepid outlook for 2019 YoY growth of just 1% spooked investors, sending the stock down over 5% on three times the normal trading volume the following day.
Lagging process technology leadership, ever increasing competition from ARM, AMD and NVIDIA, lower modem sales as iPhone unit shipments decline, falling NAND prices, data center spending significantly reduced as the hyperscalers digest and optimise their record-breaking build-out will all weigh heavily on the company in the coming quarters.
After a record breaking 2018 which saw the company’s annual revenue grow 13% to edge north of the $70 billion mark for the first time ever, Intel now faces a growing array of headwinds which will dog the company for the Year of the Pig.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
After dropping to a 52-week low of ¥11,405 on January 17 – the day after management announced a large downward revision to sales and profit guidance – Nidec rebounded to close at ¥13,055 on Friday, January 25. The latter price is 30% below the ¥18,525 peak reached a year earlier. Both the shock of the downward revision and the reflexive optimism of believers in the company now seem to have been discounted.
Consolidated sales and profits dropped abruptly in the three months to December and are expected to drop further in 4Q of FY Mar-19 due to weak demand in most regional markets, inventory write-downs and restructuring costs. Nidec is already reconfiguring its global supply chains, shipping products to the U.S. from Mexico and Europe instead of from China and planning to build factories to make motors for electric vehicles in Mexico and Poland in addition to China.
With most of the one-off expenses out of the way, profits should start to recover in FY Mar-20. Sales, on the other hand, seem likely to decline further due to weak unit demand and pricing for HDD spindle motors, falling auto production in China and elsewhere, and weakness in other industrial and commercial markets. Recovery will depend on U.S.-China trade relations and the state of the world economy, and new acquisitions that cannot be predicted. As things stand now, we expect sales to pick up going into FY Mar-21. In the long run, the company should continue to benefit from the electrification of the auto market and factory automation.
At ¥13,055, the shares are selling at 34x management’s EPS guidance for FY Mar-19, 32x our estimate for FY Mar-20 and 30x our EPS estimate for FY Mar-21. Projected EV/EBITDA multiples for the same three years are 18x, 17x and 15x. Price/book value as of the end of December is 3.9x. The dividend yield is less than 1%. Over the past few years, the P/E has found support at 20x, EV/EBITDA at 10x and the PBR at 2.5x. The January 17 low put the shares on 30x management’s new EPS guidance for this fiscal year.
REIT Discover is an insight series featuring under-researched and off-the-radar REITs in an attempt to uncover hidden gems and gems in-the-making. In this insight, we give a lowdown on Frasers Commercial Trust (FCOT SP), which appears to be at an inflection point after seven consecutive quarters of falling net property income stemming from a downward trending occupancy rates.
At the centre of its conundrum is a key property, Alexandra Technopark (ATP), whose committed occupancy as at 31 December 2018 was a dismal 68.6%.
In the meantime, there are three things happening that could help to spruce up FCOT’s operational metrics.
S$45mn asset enhancement initiative (AEI) at ATP to create a new contemporary business campus is nearing full completion. The AEI is aimed at creating a business campus environment to enhance property’s profile.
S$38mn AEI to rejuvenate the retail podium at China Square Central (CSC) which will increase its NLA from the current 64,000 sf to 78,000 sf upon completion by mid-2019. The concurrent launch of 304-room Capri by Fraser Hotel abut CSC will bring increased activity to CSC and benefit retail tenants.
Current gearing of 28.4% is one of the lowest among S-REITs, giving FCOT additional debt headroom estimated at about S$418mn to pursue growth initiatives.
Following the recent run-up in the prices of S-REITs, FCOT trades at 0.9x P/NAV (ex-DPU). At current price, annualized FY19 DPU yield of 6.7% represents a differential of about 200 basis points above that of sector leaders like Capitaland Commercial Trust and Keppel REIT, a reflection of the Grade B profile of FCOT’s commercial properties.
Interestingly, FCOT’s distributable income was growing in spite of the downtrend in gross revenue. This was likely the result of the new contribution from its UK asset acquired in January 2018. As such, FCOT was able to maintain DPU at a stable 2.40 cts for the past seven quarters. In the medium term, earnings upside will come from the organic growth of its revamped Singapore property portfolio and potential acquisitions in its sponsor’s key markets, Australia and Europe (likely UK). Any developments relating to the Brexit process will therefore have an impact on FCOT. In the near term, the built-in step-up rents mechanism in 47% of its leases in FY19 and FY20 should provide support to gross revenue. All things considered, FCOT’s future is worth a bet.
In this report, we provide an analysis of our pair trade idea between SK Telecom (017670 KS) and SK Hynix Inc (000660 KS). Our strategy will be to long SK Telecom (017670 KS) and short SK Hynix Inc (000660 KS). Our base case strategy is to achieve gains of 8-10% on this pair trade. Our risk control is to close the trade if it generates 4-5% in combined losses. Cost of commissions are not included in the calculations and closing prices as of January 25th are used in our pair trade. [Long SK Telecom – $0.5 million; Short SK Hynix – $0.5 million for total of $1.0 million].
The following are the major catalysts that could boost SK Telecom shares higher than SK Hynix shares within the next six to twelve months:
Finally, a Higher DPS for SK Telecom is Likely, but Market Has Not Fully Factored In
SK Hynix’s Plan for a 40% Lower Capex in 2019 Implies an Excess Inventory Condition
5G Service Ready to Start in March; Higher ARPU Typically Results in Higher Share Price
SK Telecom’s Establishment of an Intermediate Holding Company Will Take Place in 2019
A visit to Ramayana Lestari Sentosa (RALS IJ) in Jakarta confirmed that its positive transformation continues, as it strives to move up the value chain, bringing in more consignment brands and reassigning space to complementary tenants in its stores to draw in the crowds. This is reducing its heavy dependence on Lebaran sales, as it moves up the value chain to attract a slightly more affluent customer.
Ramayana Lestari Sentosa (RALS IJ) continues to upgrade its stores and bring in new tenants, such as cinemas and F&B such as Starbucks, as its closes loss-making supermarkets. A revamped store is expected to see a 20-25% sales enhancement. It will transform a further 30 stores in 2019, including cinemas into the mix.
The company continues to see strong performance from its consignment and fashion sales, with the drop off in supermarket sales lessening and this business no longer losing money.
Ramayana Lestari Sentosa (RALS IJ) strives to be the leader in providing fashion for the masses and continues to use celebrities to endorse its own brands.
It has decentralised sourcing of products and incentivised stores managers at the EBIT level rather than for sales. It has also introduced a strict process for discounting, which is enhancing profitability.
The company will introduce a further 20 new consignment brands in 2019 to help grow this side of the business and move up the value chain. Shoes are one of the most important growth categories.
Ramayana Lestari Sentosa (RALS IJ) is in the midst of a significant metamorphosis, which could see the company truly realise the value of its nationwide franchise, and move up the value to become less reliant on Lebaran sales. It continues to transform its store portfolio, introducing more consignment vendors and complementary tenants into its stores to increase footfall. According to Capital IQ consensus, the stock trades on 18.3x FY19E PER and 17.3x FY20E PER, with estimated EPS growth of +9% and +6% for FY19E and FY20E respectively. These growth expectations look to be conservative given the positive direction that management is taking both on its merchandising, brands, and tenant mix.
In this review, we highlight five new unrelated developments that might impact the Thai stock market if you happen to hold the affected stocks.
Skeletons in the closet. CIMB’s Thai CEO went on voluntary leave to clear his name regarding a legacy case back in his KTB days, while one of Thailand’s highest profile tycoon Dr. Prasert has been implicated in a stock manipulation case of Bangkok Airways from way back in 2015.
Religious wars? As the southern insurgency spreads to economically vibrant province of Songkhla, insurgents attack a Buddhist temple and kill two monks, possibly in an effort to turn the crisis into a religious war. Doesn’t sound great for overall stability.
A rare bump in the Baht. Despite QE unwinding, the Baht has risen almost 3% against the greenback. Bad news for exporters (eg. TUF, DELTA) good news for serial acquirers (think Thai Beverage, Banpu).
Government-inspired deals. Is the government driving M&A in Thailand these days? They certainly had a hand in the TMB-Thanachart deal and now are rumored to be buying Thaicom, the country’s only satellite operator.
Air quality takes a dive thanks to diesel and aggressive skytrain construction programs. Stores selling face mask and companies that substitute ethanol to diesel are set to benefit, while BTS might hit headwinds as government forces them to slow down construction.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
In our Discover HK Connect series, we aim to help our investors understand the flow of southbound trades via the Hong Kong Connect, as analyzed by our proprietary data engine. We will discuss the stocks that experienced the most inflow and outflow by mainland investors in the past seven days.
We split the stocks eligible for the Hong Kong Connect trade into three groups: component stocks in the HSCEI index, stocks with a market capitalization between USD 1 billion and USD 5 billion, and stocks with a market capitalization between USD 500 million and USD 1 billion.
In this week’s HK Connect Discovery, we highlight that CRRC’s outflow coincides with media reports that highlight the risks of China’s investment in high-speed railway. We also see a very substantial southbound flow into Car Inc.
Yes Bank has appointed Ravneet Gill as the bank’s CEO, effective latest from March 1, 2019, for a 3-year term. The announcement led to a spurt in the bank’s share price, as the leadership issue was finally resolved. While investors rejoiced, it remains to be seen whether the new CEO will be influenced by Rana Kapoor, who will step down as founder-CEO on January 31, 2019. Normally, in India, founders are reluctant to cede managerial control, and in banks, their influence often disrupts operational management even when the regulator has compelled founders to step down from the board. It is therefore imperative that once Rana Kapoor steps down as CEO his role should only be restricted to a founder shareholder without any operational involvement even as an advisor. Gill’s actions as Yes Bank CEO will need to be closely monitored as some board appointees have already been made prior to his taking charge. In particular, we need to closely watch how he manages the close associates of Rana Kapoor, one of whom has been elevated to the board, subject to the regulator’s approval. If Gill starts inducting experienced bankers from outside in senior positions in Yes Bank, it will demonstrate to the public that he is not under the yoke of the founder, but if he continues with the existing team of senior executive management or permits an advisory role for the departed founder-CEO it will indicate the continued strong influence of Rana Kapoor on the bank he co-founded.
We have been positive on the Chinese telcos, in part due to our thesis that peak 5G capex expectations were too high for China Mobile. That has largely played out as capex expectations have come down and the stock has performed well. The telcos see a steady state approach to 5G capex as the best way forward given the lack of a current business case. However, there are larger forces at work which imply higher capex – the need to support Huawei/ZTE (763 HK) given the moves against Chinese equipment manufacturers internationally, and the likelihood of economic stimulus packages.
Profit Warning for Q4 2018 and Q1 2019: Two Fridays ago, Elon Musk warned that Q4 profits came in lower than Q3’s, despite an 8% QoQ rise in vehicle sales during Q4. He also announced a 7% cut in Tesla’s workforce, as Tesla is now facing “a tiny profit” in Q1 that will be achieved with “great difficulty, effort and some luck”. These are extremely bearish comments from a perennial optimist like Musk. If true, however, it kills the growth story at Tesla. And with the average 15% price cut of the Model 3 in the US and 17% in China, it also shows that Tesla may have misread the demand environment for its high-priced electric sedan.
Model 3 Demand in the US has Clearly Been Exhausted: September 2018 saw peak monthly sales of 22,250 units in the US, which fell to an average monthly rate of 18,039 units in Q4. There are no more wait lists for the Model 3 at current prices: Tesla’s website says delivery can be made in under 2 weeks. In the January 18th profit warning, Musk admitted that Tesla must now sell its lowest-end version for $35,000 from May, or see production fall. At this price, Tesla’s Model 3 probably just breaks even, by our estimates.
Weak Model 3 Launch in Europe: It was hoped that the Model 3’s European launch this March would make up for waning demand in the US. But since opening up configurations for reservation holders on December 7th, Tesla only received 13,773 orders, which is a whopping 24% lower than recent monthly sales in the US. Musk was forced to open up configurations to non-reservation holders, but this led to only 2,436 extra orders over the following 2 weeks. In the US, Tesla opened up the Model 3 floodgates to non-reservation holders 12 months after launching the car. In Europe, it took less than 4 weeks.
No Hopes for Tesla in China Either in 2019: Tesla’s registrations in China for October and November 2018, combined, fell by 72% YoY and overall auto demand is weakening there. Musk proclaimed that Tesla would start production of the Model 3 in Shanghai by 2019-end. The factory site is a barren plot of land (see Figure-5). It took VW 23 months to build its latest factory in China and Toyota’s new Alabama plant will require 28 months. Why should we believe that Tesla only needs 11 months?
Watch the Competition for Tesla in 2019: Tesla will face true competition this year for its first time as 4 new European EVs hit the market. During Q4 of 2018, Jaguar’s new I-Pace outsold Tesla’s Models S and X, combined, in the Netherlands–Tesla’s number two market after the US. Audi’s e-Tron SUV–due out next month–had over 20,000 orders as of December 7th last year. Porsche’s new Taycan–a powerful rival for Tesla’s Model S–has sold out its first year of production, with most orders coming from Tesla owners. The Models S/X provided 50% of automotive gross profit in the 2H of 2018, by our estimates. A fall in volume will heavily impact profits.
Spending Will Spike in 2019 and Lead to Negative FCF: Tesla was able to squeeze out a profit during the 2H of 2018 largely because of suppressed spending on R&D and infrastructure. In order to roll out the new Shanghai plant and bring the new Model Y to market, both capex and R&D must rise significantly in 2019. Our list of “spending needs” (see Figure-1) shows that capex should nearly double to $4.5bn in 2019. Including debt obligations and payables, Tesla’s total cash needs in 2019 come to $9.3bn, which is over twice its equity. A highly dilutive public share offering appears inevitable.
Why 2019 Could Be the End of Tesla: Tesla proved in 2018 that, even with higher sales volumes and lofty pricing for the Model 3, it could only attain an estimated 2H operating margin of 1.7%, excluding environmental credits, one-offs, and stock-based compensation. 2019 will be incredibly harder as 1) Tesla faces stiff competition for the first time since its inception; 2) a lower-priced Model 3 will not generate enough profit to cover falling profitability of the Models S/X; and 3) most significantly, a steep rise in capex and R&D will lead to higher losses and negative FCF. Tesla may need a bailout by a deep-pocketed suitor this year. But this could only occur at a much lower share price.
Olympus Corporation is currently trading at JPY4,525 per share which we believe is overvalued based on our EV/EBIT valuation. The company generates nearly 80.0% of its revenue from its Medical Business where it is the global market leader for gastrointestinal endoscopes. Despite Olympus’ market share and technology leadership, the segment has been hit by investigations related to its duodenoscopies and has been fined for violating safety regulations. In addition, the Medical Division is also subject to several bribery-related investigations by the US Department of Justice and could risk losing its market share if the allegations are proven given the industry is highly competitive. Meanwhile its Imaging Business which offers cameras and lenses, is operating in a contracting market, where the segment continues to see declining revenues and is loss making.
To add to all of the above, the company is under scrutiny for governance-related issues such as lack of board diversity as well as poor corporate culture. On the positive side, the management has announced a plan to transform its business, including appointing three new (non-Japanese) directors to its board, all due to the pressure from its largest shareholder ValueAct Capital. The Management has mentioned that they will be proposing one of the partners of ValueAct as one of the three new directors at its shareholder meeting in April 2019, which is encouraging. However, that being said, we are yet to witness any tangible improvement in the way the company has conducted itself since the exposure of its accounting fraud in 2011 and has not been able to stay free of controversy. Hence, in our opinion the hefty premium at which the shares are currently trading is not justified suggesting to us that the potential turnaround in governance quality is being priced in too fully at this point. It is uncertain what other skeletons may be in Olympus’ closets and it seems premature to afford the stock a premium valuation.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
With its nationwide fiber optic network infrastructure, NTT continues to dominate the fixed line broadband market in Japan with 68% market share. In this Insight we explore the fixed line broadband market in Japan today and how it is evolving, especially with the increasing dominance of “collaboration” offerings that bundle fiber with mobile services.
Mobile services are getting a lot of attention today, especially in the run up to 5G launches over the coming 12 months, but without fiber backhaul, 5G would be a nonstarter. In this Insight we investigate what 5G will bring and what is needed to support it as well as the telcos’ latest plans.
NTT is not just an incumbent telecom operator, it’s also a key player for future technologies and provides the physical infrastructure and architecture for many of the industries new services.With all the talk about 5G it is sometimes easy to forget that fixed line networks are still necessary. With NTT’s strong fiber-based network and its collaborations with NTT Docomo and many other partners in mobile and data, we believe NTT is well positioned to be a key and winning player in the evolving telecom and technology space.
Intel‘s fourth quarter 2018 results last week missed on earnings to the tune of $360 million. That, combined with a tepid outlook for 2019 YoY growth of just 1% spooked investors, sending the stock down over 5% on three times the normal trading volume the following day.
Lagging process technology leadership, ever increasing competition from ARM, AMD and NVIDIA, lower modem sales as iPhone unit shipments decline, falling NAND prices, data center spending significantly reduced as the hyperscalers digest and optimise their record-breaking build-out will all weigh heavily on the company in the coming quarters.
After a record breaking 2018 which saw the company’s annual revenue grow 13% to edge north of the $70 billion mark for the first time ever, Intel now faces a growing array of headwinds which will dog the company for the Year of the Pig.
In our Discover HK Connect series, we aim to help our investors understand the flow of southbound trades via the Hong Kong Connect, as analyzed by our proprietary data engine. We will discuss the stocks that experienced the most inflow and outflow by mainland investors in the past seven days.
We split the stocks eligible for the Hong Kong Connect trade into three groups: component stocks in the HSCEI index, stocks with a market capitalization between USD 1 billion and USD 5 billion, and stocks with a market capitalization between USD 500 million and USD 1 billion.
In this week’s HK Connect Discovery, we highlight that CRRC’s outflow coincides with media reports that highlight the risks of China’s investment in high-speed railway. We also see a very substantial southbound flow into Car Inc.
Yes Bank has appointed Ravneet Gill as the bank’s CEO, effective latest from March 1, 2019, for a 3-year term. The announcement led to a spurt in the bank’s share price, as the leadership issue was finally resolved. While investors rejoiced, it remains to be seen whether the new CEO will be influenced by Rana Kapoor, who will step down as founder-CEO on January 31, 2019. Normally, in India, founders are reluctant to cede managerial control, and in banks, their influence often disrupts operational management even when the regulator has compelled founders to step down from the board. It is therefore imperative that once Rana Kapoor steps down as CEO his role should only be restricted to a founder shareholder without any operational involvement even as an advisor. Gill’s actions as Yes Bank CEO will need to be closely monitored as some board appointees have already been made prior to his taking charge. In particular, we need to closely watch how he manages the close associates of Rana Kapoor, one of whom has been elevated to the board, subject to the regulator’s approval. If Gill starts inducting experienced bankers from outside in senior positions in Yes Bank, it will demonstrate to the public that he is not under the yoke of the founder, but if he continues with the existing team of senior executive management or permits an advisory role for the departed founder-CEO it will indicate the continued strong influence of Rana Kapoor on the bank he co-founded.
We have been positive on the Chinese telcos, in part due to our thesis that peak 5G capex expectations were too high for China Mobile. That has largely played out as capex expectations have come down and the stock has performed well. The telcos see a steady state approach to 5G capex as the best way forward given the lack of a current business case. However, there are larger forces at work which imply higher capex – the need to support Huawei/ZTE (763 HK) given the moves against Chinese equipment manufacturers internationally, and the likelihood of economic stimulus packages.
We have increased our 2020 capex expectations for Chinese Telcos. China Mobile most affected (RMB bn)
Source: New Street Research
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
Intel‘s fourth quarter 2018 results last week missed on earnings to the tune of $360 million. That, combined with a tepid outlook for 2019 YoY growth of just 1% spooked investors, sending the stock down over 5% on three times the normal trading volume the following day.
Lagging process technology leadership, ever increasing competition from ARM, AMD and NVIDIA, lower modem sales as iPhone unit shipments decline, falling NAND prices, data center spending significantly reduced as the hyperscalers digest and optimise their record-breaking build-out will all weigh heavily on the company in the coming quarters.
After a record breaking 2018 which saw the company’s annual revenue grow 13% to edge north of the $70 billion mark for the first time ever, Intel now faces a growing array of headwinds which will dog the company for the Year of the Pig.
In our Discover HK Connect series, we aim to help our investors understand the flow of southbound trades via the Hong Kong Connect, as analyzed by our proprietary data engine. We will discuss the stocks that experienced the most inflow and outflow by mainland investors in the past seven days.
We split the stocks eligible for the Hong Kong Connect trade into three groups: component stocks in the HSCEI index, stocks with a market capitalization between USD 1 billion and USD 5 billion, and stocks with a market capitalization between USD 500 million and USD 1 billion.
In this week’s HK Connect Discovery, we highlight that CRRC’s outflow coincides with media reports that highlight the risks of China’s investment in high-speed railway. We also see a very substantial southbound flow into Car Inc.
Yes Bank has appointed Ravneet Gill as the bank’s CEO, effective latest from March 1, 2019, for a 3-year term. The announcement led to a spurt in the bank’s share price, as the leadership issue was finally resolved. While investors rejoiced, it remains to be seen whether the new CEO will be influenced by Rana Kapoor, who will step down as founder-CEO on January 31, 2019. Normally, in India, founders are reluctant to cede managerial control, and in banks, their influence often disrupts operational management even when the regulator has compelled founders to step down from the board. It is therefore imperative that once Rana Kapoor steps down as CEO his role should only be restricted to a founder shareholder without any operational involvement even as an advisor. Gill’s actions as Yes Bank CEO will need to be closely monitored as some board appointees have already been made prior to his taking charge. In particular, we need to closely watch how he manages the close associates of Rana Kapoor, one of whom has been elevated to the board, subject to the regulator’s approval. If Gill starts inducting experienced bankers from outside in senior positions in Yes Bank, it will demonstrate to the public that he is not under the yoke of the founder, but if he continues with the existing team of senior executive management or permits an advisory role for the departed founder-CEO it will indicate the continued strong influence of Rana Kapoor on the bank he co-founded.
We have been positive on the Chinese telcos, in part due to our thesis that peak 5G capex expectations were too high for China Mobile. That has largely played out as capex expectations have come down and the stock has performed well. The telcos see a steady state approach to 5G capex as the best way forward given the lack of a current business case. However, there are larger forces at work which imply higher capex – the need to support Huawei/ZTE (763 HK) given the moves against Chinese equipment manufacturers internationally, and the likelihood of economic stimulus packages.
Profit Warning for Q4 2018 and Q1 2019: Two Fridays ago, Elon Musk warned that Q4 profits came in lower than Q3’s, despite an 8% QoQ rise in vehicle sales during Q4. He also announced a 7% cut in Tesla’s workforce, as Tesla is now facing “a tiny profit” in Q1 that will be achieved with “great difficulty, effort and some luck”. These are extremely bearish comments from a perennial optimist like Musk. If true, however, it kills the growth story at Tesla. And with the average 15% price cut of the Model 3 in the US and 17% in China, it also shows that Tesla may have misread the demand environment for its high-priced electric sedan.
Model 3 Demand in the US has Clearly Been Exhausted: September 2018 saw peak monthly sales of 22,250 units in the US, which fell to an average monthly rate of 18,039 units in Q4. There are no more wait lists for the Model 3 at current prices: Tesla’s website says delivery can be made in under 2 weeks. In the January 18th profit warning, Musk admitted that Tesla must now sell its lowest-end version for $35,000 from May, or see production fall. At this price, Tesla’s Model 3 probably just breaks even, by our estimates.
Weak Model 3 Launch in Europe: It was hoped that the Model 3’s European launch this March would make up for waning demand in the US. But since opening up configurations for reservation holders on December 7th, Tesla only received 13,773 orders, which is a whopping 24% lower than recent monthly sales in the US. Musk was forced to open up configurations to non-reservation holders, but this led to only 2,436 extra orders over the following 2 weeks. In the US, Tesla opened up the Model 3 floodgates to non-reservation holders 12 months after launching the car. In Europe, it took less than 4 weeks.
No Hopes for Tesla in China Either in 2019: Tesla’s registrations in China for October and November 2018, combined, fell by 72% YoY and overall auto demand is weakening there. Musk proclaimed that Tesla would start production of the Model 3 in Shanghai by 2019-end. The factory site is a barren plot of land (see Figure-5). It took VW 23 months to build its latest factory in China and Toyota’s new Alabama plant will require 28 months. Why should we believe that Tesla only needs 11 months?
Watch the Competition for Tesla in 2019: Tesla will face true competition this year for its first time as 4 new European EVs hit the market. During Q4 of 2018, Jaguar’s new I-Pace outsold Tesla’s Models S and X, combined, in the Netherlands–Tesla’s number two market after the US. Audi’s e-Tron SUV–due out next month–had over 20,000 orders as of December 7th last year. Porsche’s new Taycan–a powerful rival for Tesla’s Model S–has sold out its first year of production, with most orders coming from Tesla owners. The Models S/X provided 50% of automotive gross profit in the 2H of 2018, by our estimates. A fall in volume will heavily impact profits.
Spending Will Spike in 2019 and Lead to Negative FCF: Tesla was able to squeeze out a profit during the 2H of 2018 largely because of suppressed spending on R&D and infrastructure. In order to roll out the new Shanghai plant and bring the new Model Y to market, both capex and R&D must rise significantly in 2019. Our list of “spending needs” (see Figure-1) shows that capex should nearly double to $4.5bn in 2019. Including debt obligations and payables, Tesla’s total cash needs in 2019 come to $9.3bn, which is over twice its equity. A highly dilutive public share offering appears inevitable.
Why 2019 Could Be the End of Tesla: Tesla proved in 2018 that, even with higher sales volumes and lofty pricing for the Model 3, it could only attain an estimated 2H operating margin of 1.7%, excluding environmental credits, one-offs, and stock-based compensation. 2019 will be incredibly harder as 1) Tesla faces stiff competition for the first time since its inception; 2) a lower-priced Model 3 will not generate enough profit to cover falling profitability of the Models S/X; and 3) most significantly, a steep rise in capex and R&D will lead to higher losses and negative FCF. Tesla may need a bailout by a deep-pocketed suitor this year. But this could only occur at a much lower share price.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
Olympus Corporation is currently trading at JPY4,525 per share which we believe is overvalued based on our EV/EBIT valuation. The company generates nearly 80.0% of its revenue from its Medical Business where it is the global market leader for gastrointestinal endoscopes. Despite Olympus’ market share and technology leadership, the segment has been hit by investigations related to its duodenoscopies and has been fined for violating safety regulations. In addition, the Medical Division is also subject to several bribery-related investigations by the US Department of Justice and could risk losing its market share if the allegations are proven given the industry is highly competitive. Meanwhile its Imaging Business which offers cameras and lenses, is operating in a contracting market, where the segment continues to see declining revenues and is loss making.
To add to all of the above, the company is under scrutiny for governance-related issues such as lack of board diversity as well as poor corporate culture. On the positive side, the management has announced a plan to transform its business, including appointing three new (non-Japanese) directors to its board, all due to the pressure from its largest shareholder ValueAct Capital. The Management has mentioned that they will be proposing one of the partners of ValueAct as one of the three new directors at its shareholder meeting in April 2019, which is encouraging. However, that being said, we are yet to witness any tangible improvement in the way the company has conducted itself since the exposure of its accounting fraud in 2011 and has not been able to stay free of controversy. Hence, in our opinion the hefty premium at which the shares are currently trading is not justified suggesting to us that the potential turnaround in governance quality is being priced in too fully at this point. It is uncertain what other skeletons may be in Olympus’ closets and it seems premature to afford the stock a premium valuation.
Tracking Traffic/Containers & Air Cargo is the hub for all of our research on container shipping and air cargo, featuring analysis of monthly industry data, notes from our conversations with industry participants, and links to recent company and thematic pieces.
Tracking Traffic/Containers & Air Cargo aims to highlight changes to existing trends, relationships, and views affecting the leading Asian companies in these two sectors. This month’s note includes data from about twenty different sources.
In this issue readers will find:
An analysis of December container shipping rates: Our proprietary index suggests average container shipping rates firmed again in December. Firmer rates in Q418, combined with a moderation in fuel prices, probably lifted carrier margins in the period, and this improvement is likely to spill over into Q119.
A look at December air cargo activity, which slumped, again: The five Asia-based airlines we track reported a ~2% Y/Y decline in air cargo handled. After growing by a healthy +6.3% Y/Y in H118, air cargo demand at these five carriers has shown a consistent monthly decline, growing by just 1% in Q418 and shrinking slightly in November and December.
For container carriers and airlines, fuel price increases have continued to moderate. As of mid-January, the price of bunker fuel was up just 4% Y/Y, and the price of jet fuel had declined by around 7%. Throughout much of 2018, fuel prices had risen 20-40% Y/Y, or more.
Japanese carriers’ December quarter earnings on the horizon: We will soon find out whether improving conditions in container shipping showed up in the carriers’ P&Ls, as the three major Japanese shipping companies are set to report December quarter results at the break on January 31.
Although slowing demand growth is unlikely to generate impressive top-line improvements, firmer pricing combined with lower fuel costs should support an ongoing improvement in profitability for container carriers in the near-term. Meanwhile, the slump in air cargo demand has not yet hit air cargo yields, but it’s becoming clearer that an economic slowdown is hurting demand for this relatively expensive mode of transport.
Our thesis on Subaru has maintained for some time that margins were inflated due to under-spending and that these costs would surface in one form or the other over time.
As it turns out, the costs were incurred through recalls as Subaru downgraded its FY OP guidance from ¥300bn to ¥220bn on 5 Nov. What continues to concern us is the constant stream of negative news flow on quality and sustainability-related issues. While the latest announcements do not imply excessive direct costs for the company, they continue to raise the question of whether corners were being cut and thus create doubt about the formerly excellent and still very high OPMs generated by Subaru.
We remain negative on Subaru as we expect margins to remain under pressure and believe top line may stagnate or shrink over the next one to two years.
Osaka official targets Q3 this year for decision on the winning bid, citing a more the merrier attitude on the number of licensee presumptives.
Bidders estimate investment for Osaka at anywhere between US$7bn. TO US$10bn.
Top competitors for Osaka in our view are: MGM Resorts, Galaxy Entertainment Group, Melco Resorts and Entertainment, Las Vegas Sands and Wynn Resorts. Our view: Buy all five at current great entry points.
2018 full results due on the 18th February 2019: Since our initial report on 3rd September 2018, SIQ’s share price has declined some 21% versus the ASX All Ordinaries fall of circa 8%. With results due, we expect the market to refocus on Smartgroup and its good growth story. This is important as much of the focus for the group in the last two years has been on the acquisitions being made. To see management return focus to organic growth, post these acquisitions should help investor confidence in SIQ. Specifically concentrating on the cross-selling of its services whilst benefiting from Australia’s tight labour market and corporates chasing incremental cost savings can only be positives.
Review and upgrade to forecasts: With the benefit of further time to review SIQ’s business progress and the composition of our forecasts, we have increased fiscal 2018 and 2019 EPS forecasts 10% and 12% respectively. Much of our thought process is at the SG&A line, whilst the view that the overall trajectory of earnings remains on track.
2019 we expect to be a year of consolidation, with consistent growth: In the two years to the end of fiscal 2017, SIQ had made six acquisitions. These acquisitions were aimed at both industry consolidation, as well as complementary product build out. We expect 2019 to be a year where the benefits from these acquisitions are exhibited in both the bottom and top-line growth. We expect this even though 2019 may present macro challenges.
We reiterate our view that SIQ offers Growth at a Reasonable price: SIQ’s forward multiples are positive for a company which has posted a long term book value growth rate of circa 7%(net of dividend) and is forecast to post a similar rate 2019 and in 2020. Based on our 2019 EPS forecasts SIQ should be able to deliver circa A$0.62/share, which implies 18% YoY growth and a 13 times P/E.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
