In our Discover HK Connect series, we aim to help our investors understand the flow of southbound trades via the Hong Kong Connect, as analyzed by our proprietary data engine. We will discuss the stocks that experienced the most inflow and outflow by mainland investors in the past seven days.
We split the stocks eligible for the Hong Kong Connect trade into three groups: component stocks in the HSCEI index, stocks with a market capitalization between USD 1 billion and USD 5 billion, and stocks with a market capitalization between USD 500 million and USD 1 billion.
In this insight, we will highlight PICC and Xinyi Solar.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
In our Discover HK Connect series, we aim to help our investors understand the flow of southbound trades via the Hong Kong Connect, as analyzed by our proprietary data engine. We will discuss the stocks that experienced the most inflow and outflow by mainland investors in the past seven days.
We split the stocks eligible for the Hong Kong Connect trade into three groups: component stocks in the HSCEI index, stocks with a market capitalization between USD 1 billion and USD 5 billion, and stocks with a market capitalization between USD 500 million and USD 1 billion.
In this insight, we will highlight PICC and Xinyi Solar.
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
We maintain PLANB with a BUY rating with the target price of Bt8.30 derived from 1.5xPEG’2019E of Thai consumer discretionary sector, which implies to 36xPE’19E.
The story:
Collaboration among the leaders in OOH industry
Revising down EPS in 2019-21E by 9-11% due to dilution effect
Risks: Obstacles for renewing concession contracts with state-owned enterprises along with falling consumer spending and a share-price dilution effect on the back of then generally mandated raise in capital.
China Meidong Auto (1268 HK) has been a great success story for its investors in the last two years. I first wrote about the company in May 2017 when shares were trading at 1.53 HKD. This week shares traded over 4.7 HKD. While the share price has gyrated wildly the past 24 months the underlying earnings of the company have been increasing steadily and shareholders have been rewarded with solid dividends.
FY18 results were released last month which showed strong growth in revenues (+44%) and net profits (+31%). With the importance of Lexus and Porsche increasing, FY19 should be another year of growth. The performance of BMW remains a wild card.
With the stock up 59% YTD shares are now fairly valued and trading at a 30% premium to its peers. Meidong remains a long-term favorite but has now exceeded my fair value estimate of 4.4 HKD (10x 2019 EPS). I suggest waiting for a better entry point.
NTT Docomo Inc (9437 JP) recently announced it would sell its 25% stake in Hutchinson Telecom Hong Kong’s ( Hutchison Telecommunications Hk Hld (215 HK) mobile unit for US$60mn with closing expected at the end of May. This ends a 20-year association with Hutchinson forged in the initial excitement over 3G in 1999 but it hasn’t been a good ride for DoCoMo which lost close to 90% on its Hutchison investments and its other international forays were not much better. On a related note, the HK mobile sale follows soon after DoCoMo’s exit from its credit card joint venture with Sumitomo Mitsui but we would not read anything into this beyond a rationalization of its non-core investments.
Profitability at China Minsheng Banking A (600016 CH) in 2018 slipped. Similar to other Chinese lenders, rising Loan Loss Provisions exerted a negative pull on the bottom-line, testament to gnawing Asset Quality issues. In addition, similar to some banks, the top-line came under pressure from the rising cost of source of funding. Also the bank was not alone in juicing up its bottom-line with hefty trading gains. Thus Earnings Quality could have been better.
Given the underlying squeeze on core Income, it was encouraging to see management at least restrain OPEX.
Regarding Asset quality, write-offs soared by 153% YoY while substandard and loss Loans jumped by 68% YoY and 14%, respectively, and Loan Loss Provisions rose by 35.6% YoY. It is perhaps a little surprising then that coverage ratios decreased given the trend in credit costs, NPL migration, and charge-offs.
LDR remains quite high though credit growth last year was not gung-ho and broadly in line with Deposit expansion. We do note though a ratcheting up of CRE lending which jumped from 8.8% of the total Loan book to 12.3%.
Shares do not appear optically dear: the bank trades on a P/Book, FV, Dividend and Earnings Yields of 0.7x, 9%, 5.2% and 17.4%, respectively. However, we see better quality value elsewhere, in particular at “The Big Four” which can be termed safer Income opportunities.
Rakuten Inc (4755 JP) investee Pinterest Inc (PINS US) has filed its IPO prospectus implying a lower valuation than its last venture round but a robust increase in value since Rakuten led the Series C round in May 2012. We think an initial ¥4bn investment could be worth ¥25-30bn at the midpoint of the suggested IPO range.
As with Lyft, the absolute value again and shift to greater liquidity are positive as it gives Rakuten more financial flexibility as it ramps up investments in the mobile business.
Unlike Lyft, the Pinterest IPO value is down from the latest funding round which impacts paper profits that provide cover for spending on mobile albeit at a fraction of the upside from Lyft.
Pinterest doesn’t generate the same headlines as Lyft but a second IPO of a Rakuten investment as its cash needs expand can only be good news
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
Last Friday, Hitachi (6501) was reported to be considering selling Hitachi Chemical (4217), according to media sources over the weekend. This has sent Hitachi Chemical and its parent into a frenzy with Hitachi Chemical ADR up 13% last Friday. We believe this news is relevant for Hitachi High Tech because both subsidiaries are 51-52% consolidated by the parent Hitachi, and both have arguably businesses with little synergy with the parent. We believe that Hitachi High Tech is also rumored to be on the block for sale or spin-off. Media sources say that Hitachi is considering a sale of Hitachi Chemical and would reap Y300bn. The current value of their 51% ownership in Hitachi Chemical is Y211bn, and thus there is 42% implied upside if the Y300bn figure is achieved.
To recap Q3 results for Hitachi High Tech from January 31, 2019, the numbers were decent with earnings above consensus forecasts by 33% for Q3 (Y15.8bn OP versus Y13.8bn forecast). The profit rise was due to improved margins in medical and continued strength in process semiconductor equipment. The shares are up 20% year-to-date, outperforming the Nikkei by 15%. Some of the fears of a sharp slowdown in semiconductor have been nullified by the continued strength in logic chip investments as well as the improved profitability in medical clinical analyzers. Medical profits soared 46% YoY in Q3 to Y7.6bn on a 13% YoY increase in revenues. OP margin improved from 12.3% to 15.8% YoY.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
Over the last 12 months, these shares have been a dreadful performer (as have the other ball bearing makers), both in absolute terms (-36%) and on a relative basis (underperformed TOPIX by 30%). Operating profits for the full year have recently been revised down (for the second time). The operating environment has deteriorated markedly into 4Q. It would appear to us that the market, and analysts, are aware of the current poor trading conditions. The question is when will conditions start to improve. The first half of next year will be very poor indeed with profits down perhaps 35% year-on-year. And it now appears that some analyst’s numbers do not assume recovery for any of next fiscal year, which we believe as too harsh.
Clearly the first half of next year (3/20) is going to show very poor year on year comparisons. This will be unavoidable given a good first half this year and business conditions now. The company itself is now forecasting a 4Q operating profit of Y16.7bn (-40%) having made Y24.8bn in 1Q, Y20.2bn in 2Q and Y21.3bn in 3Q. Assuming this level carries on into the first half of next year before starting a gradual recovery in the second half, then first half operating profit may well come in at about Y32-33bn, a 35% year-on-year fall. The consensus for the full year is currently about Y70bn with the lowest number being Y64bn. Sell recommendations have also begun to appear. To us this appear to be a bit after the event given where earnings are now and where the shares are trading.
The shares currently yield 4.2% and the pay-out ratio this year is 36%. Management’s target is for 30% but at the same time they are reluctant to cut the dividend going forward. This may well prove some support. Meanwhile the company owns 7% of itself and on our calculation is trading on an EV/ebitda of just under 4x. Finally, its book value (0.9x) relative to the market’s book value is now at a very depressed level (see chart below) which suggests to us that although there may be some short term down side risk, we would look to buy on a longer term.
NIO’s 6-month Lock-up expires today and as of the time of this writing the stock is down by 6.6% from the closing price on Friday, March 8. The stock’s share overhang issue have been well covered on the Smartkarma platform by other analysts (see NIO Post-CBS Rally Making TSLA Valuation a Grand Bargain (Price Target =$3) , NIO (NIO US): Lock-Up Expiry – This Could Get Messy) so while we do not see a need to rehash those details in this insight, here are 3 things that we believe every NIO investor and would-be investor should keep in mind about the company especially if one wants to play the Tesla vs. NIO scenario:
Licensing/Regulatory Risk – NIO has an autonomous driving testing license but no EV manufacturing license. An EV manufacturing license issued by the NDRC is required for EV manufacturers to market and sell their products but a 100k unit scale is a main prerequisite. This is a key reason why NIO entered into a 5-year outsourcing relationship with JAC. While this relationship was assumed to be temporary, there could be many hurdles for NIO to actually obtain a license in the coming years should it decide to invest in production facilities again.
Core IP Held by Suppliers – Powertrain technology is held by CATL and the State-owned JAC is listed as the ES8’s manufacturer on the Ministry of Information and Technology website. Continental AG designs NIO’s vehicle suspension and chassis. It is also unclear how much actual development work other than exterior/cockpit design is done in-house at NIO based on publicly available information. Without scale and IP we believe NIO’s bargaining position with its suppliers is weak and displays stronger characteristics of a distributor than a final assembler.
Low ASP, low margins – NIO’s ASP on the ES8 from what we have seen was $64k per unit in 2018 and $63k per unit in 1Q19 while Tesla’s Model X ASP is about $100k per unit. There is a reason why gross margin at NIO is razor thin and it has more to do with low price point than low volumes in our view.
Given differences between the U.S. and China operating environment for EV makers, we believe Tesla is not a good equity valuation comp for NIO, which is basically a distributor in our view. As such, long term value drivers would most likely come from aftermarket and service revenues, while short-mid term value drivers seem elusive especially in the aftermath of the company’s decision to scrap its production plant investment plans in Shanghai.
REIT Discover is an insight series featuring under-researched and off-the-radar REITs in an attempt to identify hidden gems and gems in-the-making. In this issue, we follow up on the first China outlet mall REIT listed in Singapore, Sasseur Real Estate Investment (SASSR SP) , whose share price is down 7.5% from its IPO price of S$0.80 since its debut on 28 March 2018. Its distributable income exceeded its IPO forecast for FY2018. Annualized distribution per unit (DPU) yield for FY2018 was 9.1% based on current price. Moving forward, FY2019 DPU projection is S$0.06, translating into a DPU yield of 8.1% compared to FY2018. It is likely that the DPU for the projection years are conservative and the REIT manager will endeavour to beat the IPO forecast for FY2019 and even the annualized DPU for FY2018.
Sasseur REIT’s business model differs from other typical retail malls which lease out assets and receive rental income based on an agreed rental rate. Instead, it has structured a complex form of master lease, called the Entrusted Management Agreement (EMA), where it received a percentage of tenants’ sales turnover as the rental. As such, income generated its portfolio of properties are mainly sales-driven and hence may be unstable.
Essentially, the EMA encompasses a set of obligations that binds the sponsor to a two-year income support to Sasseur REIT in exchange for a long-term master lease which limits DPU upside. This is because a large chunk of the portfolio’s potential revenue growth will go to the sponsor.
We are not saying this is all bad; the master lease under the EMA provides income stability to the REIT given that gross revenue is sales-driven. Rather, we acknowledge the resilience of the outlet mall business model as seen from the long and successful track record of Tanger Factory Outlet Centers Inc (SKT US) in the United States and strong growth of Bailian Group’s outlet business in China. What is striking is China’s small outlet market size relatively to the mature regions despite the sheer size of its growing middle to upper-middle class population. This suggests that China’s outlet industry could grow significantly.
At 29% gearing ratio, Sasseur REIT has additional debt headroom of S$283mn to tap on its right-of-first-refusal (ROFR) pipeline of assets to grow its S$1.5bn initial portfolio. Even without inorganic growth, two of its properties, representing 43% of total portfolio valuation, are relatively new assets in their third year of operation, suggesting strong potential for growth. Sasseur REIT looks promising based its results in the last three quarters. Sasseur REIT’s premium P/NAV of 1.03x at the point of listing was surprisingly expensive given that its properties are non-prime outlet malls in China’s Tier-Two cities. P/NAV has since fallen to an attractive 0.8x.
In our Discover HK Connect series, we aim to help our investors understand the flow of southbound trades via the Hong Kong Connect, as analyzed by our proprietary data engine. We will discuss the stocks that experienced the most inflow and outflow by mainland investors in the past seven days.
We split the stocks eligible for the Hong Kong Connect trade into three groups: component stocks in the HSCEI index, stocks with a market capitalization between USD 1 billion and USD 5 billion, and stocks with a market capitalization between USD 500 million and USD 1 billion.
In this insight, we will highlight PICC and Xinyi Solar.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
Yesterday, King Street sent a letter to Toshiba Corp (6502 JP) CEO Nobuaki Kurumatani, applying pressure by threatening to nominate alternative directors to the company’s board. The full contents of the letter can be found here.
King Street’s requirements for the new board are stated as:
Among other things, the new Board must:
(i) ensure management applies rigorous financial discipline to capital allocation decisions, including use of excess cash, determination of optimal capital structure and capital expenditure return requirements;
(ii) drive management to re-examine Toshiba’s business portfolio with a critical eye on competitive position, sector landscape, synergies available and profitable growth prospects;
(iii) direct management to evaluate non-operating and underperforming businesses and assets (while respecting that Toshiba may need to be engaged in certain activities important to Japan’s national security interests);
(iv) ensure that management attains global peer profitability levels at each business segment based on projections supported by robust, bottoms-up analysis; and
(v) instill a culture of accountability and ownership at all levels of the organization.
Given developments in the intervening time period including a sell-down of about 27% of King Street’s initial stake at a price of ¥3,925 (some 64% below the “well over ¥11,000” per share they feel Toshiba is worth) according to Bloomberg, and a downward revision to OP guidance from ¥60bn to ¥20bn, we feel that there is little reason to change our assessment.
Lippo Malls Indonesia Retail Trust (LMRT SP) (“LMIRT”) today announced the acquisition of Lippo Mall Puri from its sponsor PT Lippo Karawaci Tbk for a consideration of Rp.3,700.0 bil (S$354.7 mil).
There is a significant amount of vendor support provided by Lippo Group to improve the net property income and NPI yield of Lippo Mall Puri. If we exclude the vendor support from the target NPI, the NPI yield excluding vendor support will just be 6.52% per annum.
The transaction is DPU and yield dilutive. The resultant DPU post-transaction will decline from 2.05 S-cents to 1.61 S-cents / 1.42 S-cents. Distribution yield will also fall from 10.25% to 9.28% / 8.85% based on TERP.
The transaction could also potentially result in LMIRT’s gearing increasing from 34.6% to 39.0% which will worsen its balance sheet strength and credit standings.
In view of the unattractive acquisition and potential EFR dilution, investors should avoid LMIRT for now and wait for opportunity to enter with a greater margin of safety.
Following three years of share price declines, Chris Hoare has started to moderate his negative view on Bharti Infratel (BHIN IN). Our thesis, that Infratel would struggle as the market consolidated to three players, has largely played out. We remain wary of the viability of Vodafone Idea (IDEA IN) at current tariff levels but the ongoing capital raising at IDEA puts off the day of reckoning, while IDEA’s exit penalties (as they consolidate with Vodafone) are being paid quarterly which will flatter revenues/cash flow. We think earnings forecasts have probably bottomed for the time being and raise our recommendation to Neutral and upgrade our price target to INR270 (from INR220).
Geo Energy Resources (GERL SP) reported weak 4Q18 results late last month. The reason for the 5M USD net loss in 4Q18 was mainly due to Chinese import restrictions for Indonesian coal in November and December last year. With the import quota removed as of January ICI4 coal prices have rebounded from +/-30 USD/ton late 2018 to 40 USD/ton this week.
Geo remains in deep value territory (3x EV/EBITDA) as the company still has over 200M USD+ in cash it raised from a 300M USD bond placing almost 18 months ago. While the CEO announced plans to organize a HK dual listing in 1H19 this cannot materialize unless management can execute on a significant acquisition opportunity it has been considering for the last twelve months. With Indonesian elections coming up next month the hope is that clarity on this potential transaction can be sorted by late 1H19.
While Europe is obsessed with Climate Change doomsday scenarios being shouted around by school-skipping teenagers, the reality is that three out of four of the most populated countries in the world (China, India and Indonesia) will remain heavy users of coal for decades to come. With cleaner coal technology being the key differentiator how much pollution is emitted.
My Fair Value estimate (Base case) remains 0.35 SGD or 89% upside. Please recall, Macquarie paid 0.29 SGD for a 5% stake in November 2018 and had warrants issued to it at 0.33 SGD.
Meituan Dianping reported 4Q2018 numbers last night. As we covered the company’s IPO and lock-up expiry, we took a close look the company 4Q2018 results and listened in the conference call. While we are encouraged by the company’s strong transaction volume and revenue growth in 4Q2018, we are less bullish given the deceleration of monetization growth. We also note that the company trimmed down the details of reporting, in particular, the operation of its New Initiative segment and hence results were less transparent.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
Originally, Krung Thai Bank Pub (KTB TB) struck us as interesting. A solid PH Score™, reasonable franchise valuation and P/Book, and a low RSI.
However, further due-diligence shows a somewhat stagnant and eroding operation.
Headline profitability improvement is unrelated to efficiency or to operational advances.
Cost growth is fast outpacing a declining top-line.
Interest income has actually fallen for each of the last 3 years.
The bank is being squeezed on margin despite keeping interest expenses unchanged.
Non-interest expenses soared by 26% YoY.
The bottom line (and profitability) was flattered by varied low quality items as well as much lower loan loss provisions, but still remained well above comprehensive income.
Asset Quality is also concerning (despite lower loan loss provisions) given the sharp rise in loss (especially) and substandard loans as well as the amount of Special Mention Loans on the Balance Sheet. This means provisioning of problem loans may not be sufficient.
Liquidity: Deposits are also declining, pushing up the LDR.
An attractively valued company with a minimum market cap of USD $1 billion but no sell-side coverage.Doubledragon Properties (DD PM) meets those criteria.
Why Read This Report?
Learn about the Philippines youngest self-made billionaire*, Edgar ‘Injap’ Sia, how he created one of the largest fast-food chains (Mang Inasal) in the country and successfully sold it to Jollibee Foods (JFC PM) for over USD$100 M.
After selling Mang Inasal in 2010, Sia started building DoubleDragon (DD) as he joined hands with Tony Tan (founder of Jollibee Foods (JFC PM) ). DD was listed in 2014 at a market value of USD$85 M (PHP2/share) and reached a market cap of over USD$3 B USD two years after listing (PHP70/share).
DD’s valuation mid-2016 was overhyped and overvalued.
From mid-2016 to late 2018 the share price fell by approximately 75%. Last year the stock bottomed at PHP17.2 despite fundamentals improving drastically between 2016 and 2018.
This has created a unique opportunity to invest in a diversified property company whose main earnings contributor will come from building neighborhood malls in suburban communities outside Metro Manila. It is forecast that 90% of its revenues would be recurring in nature by FY20.
We value DD on a blended a) P/E multiple and b) Cap Rate basis.
DD recently traded around PHP 22/share and is currently valued at 9.5x FY20 P/E, a steep discount to its industry peers. Assuming the company achieves PHP10.8 B in recurring revenues by FY20 the market is currently valuing the company at a 21% Cap Rate vs 7% for its primary peer Sm Prime Holdings (SMPH PM). DD should trade at a discount to SM (long track record, higher liquidity, included in PSE index) but the gap is too wide.
We argue DD should trade at a) 15x P/E and b) 10% cap rate. Combining the two valuation methods we arrive at a blended Fair Value of PHP 40.31/share, or 83% upside from current levels.
Assumptions
Fair Value
15x 2020 P/E
PHP 35
10% Cap Rate
PHP 45.63
BLENDED FAIR VALUE
40.31 PHP
The founders control 70% of the company and expect to grow the current USD$1.2B market cap exponentially the coming 3-5 years. DoubleDragon is a potential multi-bagger in the making.
Catalysts to unlock value at DoubleDragon would be:
FY18 results publication by early April 2019
Delivery of 100 operating CityMalls by FY20
The passing of workable REIT law
Delivery of PHP5.5B FY20 profit target
FCF inflection point coming closer in FY20
Re-discovery by sell-side firms as index inclusion looms
Visibility into FY21-FY25 dividend potential
Footnote: *Injap was reported as having USD$1 B in assets by Forbes in 2017, as the share price of DD has fallen we estimate this has dropped to approximately USD$ 400-500 M, which would still rank him among the top-25 wealthiest individuals in the Philippines.
We believe this presents an excellent opportunity to look at the stock on the short side again.
We would also refer readers to an article from Livedoor news which delves into the company’s issues from a local industry insider’s perspective. The article is in Japanese and the google translated version is almost unintelligible but we summarise the salient points and our perspective below.
ITD Cementation India Ltd (ITDCIL) is one of the few pure-play infrastructure execution companies left in India, in the last decade the entire infra space in India has diversified into debt funded asset heavy infra ownership which has led to tremendous value destruction. The company is engaged in the construction of marine structures, highways, bridges & flyovers, metros, airports, hydro-tunneling, dams & canals, water & wastewater segment, industrial structures, buildings and specialist foundation engineering projects with presence across India. IDTCIL receives technological support from its parent company Italian-Thai Development Public Company Ltd (ITDPCL). ITDPCL has a presence across the globe and has expertise in the airport, Mass Rapid Transit System (MRTS), high-speed bullet train projects, marine projects among others.
In the last 12 months, ITDCIL has grown at 24% with revenue at INR 25.9 bn. EBITDA and PAT stood at INR 3.34 bn and INR 1.18 bn receptively with EBITDA margin and PAT margin at 12.9% and 4.57% receptively. EBITDA margins contracted by 174 bps and PAT margin expanded by 109 bps. During the same period EBITDA grew by 9% and PAT increased by 62.4%.
The company’s order book as of Dec’18 stands at INR 95 bn with 45 bn order inflow between Jan’18 to Dec’18 its Book to Bill ratio is 3.73 times.
Drivers: India is an infra deficit country. In 2015, India spent about 5% of GDP on Infra and this expenditure needs to cost about 8.5% (Climate adjusted investment under high growth scenario of 7.8% GDP growth) over 2016-2030 and estimated infra spending though 2030 is expected to be USD 5.5 tn. Per the Global Competitive Index, India’s infrastructure score had increased from 3.4 out of 7 in 2008 to 4.2 points out of 7 in 2017. Being the fastest growing among large economies and infra deficit country, India offers enough opportunities for investment in the infrastructure sector.
ITDCIL has proven expertise in urban infra ( especially metro rail) and marine structures which are seeing a huge impetus in India with almost all major cities either building or planning to develop metro rails and significant investments going into developing port infrastructures and inland waterways through the Sagarmala, river cleaning through Namami Gange among others. The Government of India (GOI) is expected to spend about INR 8 trillion through Sagarmala and INR 200 bn through Namami Gange. ITD Cementation India Ltd is expected to be one of the beneficiary due to its experience in metro and marine segment.
The company is expected to grow at 65% in FY19 (15-month financial year) and is expected to register EBITDA margin of 12.4% and Profit margin of 4.26% with EBITDA at INR 4.3 bn and Profit at INR 1.57 bn. The company’s shares at the current price of INR 132 are trading at a PEx 19.21x its TTM EPS, 19.12x its FY19F EPS (calculated for 12 months) and 16.31x its FY20F EPS. The company’s ROE and ROA for the previous financial year stood at 11.81% and 3.05% respectively.
We maintain our positive view toward its long-term outlook on the backs of potential growth from its location and secured contract with government agency. Maintain a BUY rating with a new target price of Bt16.8 (SOTP).
The story:
We cut our 2019-2021 earnings forecast by 12-13% to factor in rising depreciation expenses caused by its shortening depreciated years of PTW’s assets.
Our new target price of Bt16.8 is derived from Some-of-the-parts (SOTP) which comprises (1) Bt13.8 from core business (tap water supply under both TTW and PTW) based on DCF(6.7%WACC, 0%TG) and (2) Bt3.0 from CKP based on IFA report.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
Our recent conversation with CyberAgent’s IR team suggests that a significant improvement in the OP margin is unlikely in the next few quarters. The OP margins of both Game business and the Internet Advertisement, while likely to improve gradually, are likely to remain low compared to recent history due to higher advertising and personnel costs.
Upfront investments in AbemaTV are likely to continue until the target of 10m Weekly Average Users (WAU) is met, which could take a year or more. The company expects around 50% of AbemaTV revenue to eventually come from premium users, which seems to be a shift in strategy, from a “free” service towards a more hybrid model.
CyberAgent’s share price closed at ¥4,050 on Tuesday, up 7.1% from its previous close, following the news that the stock was added to the Goldman Sachs’ conviction list with a reiterated buy rating. However, even before this, CyberAgent’s share price had been on a steady increase over the past two weeks (+29.0%), recovering from a one-year low in early February. This increase, despite rather mediocre 1Q results, a downward revision of OP guidance, and lack of any major short term catalysts is an indication that the market deems CyberAgent to be undervalued – mainly on the AbemaTV front.
Of the five interesting trends/events/developments we heard this month, we highlighted five and how they could impact Thai equities in the near term:
Thai Raksa Chart Party dissolution. The dissolution of the TRC, the second largest Thaksinite party, poses some political risks but could affect sentiments for companies founded by Thaksin, such as Intuch and AIS.
Thai Air Asia says no to Nok Air. After the briefest considerations, the larger airline came to the conclusion that they wouldn’t acquire a stake in struggling Nok Air.
Capital Gains Taxes are currently under consideration by the government for the first time. If implemented, they are likely to have negative impact on overall equities but the brokers in particular.
From LINE to BEC. LINE (Thailand)’s Country Manager Ariya Phanomyong has agreed to move to BEC. Though mildly positive, we believe improvements will revolve around distribution rather than the more key issue of content.
True Move’s Request for 5G delay may sound odd at first glance, but we see it as a rational, if not very tactful, way of delaying a new round of capex.
Conference call with Meituan Dianping (3690 HK) reveals that ballooning losses from new initiatives (incl. one-off expenses) largely contributed to record quarterly EBIT losses in 4Q18.
Importantly, this masks Meituan Core’s (combined food delivery and in-store, hotel & travel divisions) continued progress toward profitability.
Management is bullish on every division’s outlook in 2019, particularly guiding for 1) balanced growth and profitability strategy for food delivery and 2) disciplined investments in new initiatives.
Meituan attractively trades at 2.9x 2019E P/S, only around half of peers’ valuation (5.5x).
In this series under Smartkarma Originals, CrossASEAN insight providers AngusMackintosh and Jessica Irene seek to determine whether or not we are close to the end of the rainbow and to a period of outperformance for the property sector. Our end conclusions will be based on a series of company visits to the major listed property companies in Indonesia, conversations with local banks, property agents, and other relevant channel checks.
The third company that we explore is Pakuwon Jati (PWON IJ), the biggest retail mall operator, and mixed-use high rise and township developer since 1986. PWON has five major projects in the two biggest cities: Jakarta and Surabaya.
Its recurring income base is the highest in the Indonesian property universe, playing a big role in the company’s solid earnings performance in the past few years of property downturn. However, currency depreciation, stricter mortgage regulations, and falling rental yields curb investors’ appetite for property investments, leading to weak presales in the past three years. Property development revenues are expected to be trending down going forward on lower presales in 2016-2018. Contrary to peers, cashflow generation remains very strong, led by the large recurring income base and thick margin. There is however no plan to increase dividends, but rather reserving the excess cash for future landbank acquisition.
The weaker presales in 1H19 is widely anticipated, but we fear that there may be some selling pressure on each weak presales announcements, given PWON’s premium valuations and stock outperformance YTD. Nonetheless, potential portfolio inflow to high beta stocks and rising risk appetite for smaller-capped stocks should be beneficial for PWON. Our blended target price of IDR773 per share offers 21% upside.
Summary of this insight:
PWON currently operates 7 retail malls, 4 office towers for lease, 4 hotels, and 1 serviced apartment as its recurring income base, representing 52% of revenues. Retail mall division is PWON’s single biggest revenue contributor, growing at 16% Cagr over the past 5 years, making up 40% of total revenues and 77% of total recurring incomes.
The company sells landed housings, condominiums, and offices in five project locations as its “non-recurring” property development revenues, which account for the remaining 48% of revenues. Condominiums and offices are PWON’s second biggest revenue generator, comprising about 30-40% of sales. PWON has been pushing more landed residential projects to mitigate the impact from slower condominiums and offices market.
Accessibility is a key factor to land appreciation and hence, company’s total NAV. With the traffic worsening around the Greater Jakarta area, time to commute is an increasingly important factor in determining where to stay and access to public transportation such as MRT and LRT will be a powerful driver going forward. PWON’s landbanks are located in strategic locations, essential to the success of its past projects in Jakarta and Surabaya.
Presales are more sensitive to investment appetite and rental yield rather than BI rates. Cash and cash installments typically make up 65-85% of total payments, while mortgages comprise a minority 15-35%.
Slower take up rate on high-rise projects leads to larger funding requirement. Condominiums can take up to four years to complete if it is part of a superblock project, and a big portion of the raw materials for construction has to be secured and paid upfront to lock in prices and ensure availability. Meanwhile, the presales mortgage disbursement regulation issued in 2014 diminishes cash inflow from mortgage-paying customers. We constructed a cashflow simulation model for a typical condominium tower launch to analyze the monthly cashflow impact from slower take up rate and mortgage regulation changes.
Pros: The operating cashflow remains positive and strong over the past five years of property downturn, the best among the property developers that we visited. The seven retail malls generate over IDR1tn cash per year in the past three years, enough to sustain company’s working capital and capex requirements. Free cashflow (FCF) is mostly positive with the exception of 2014 and 2015 when PWON had two big acquisitions. Net gearing peaked in 2015 and had slowly decreased over the years.
Cons: For the first time since 2010, PWON’s advances-to-inventory ratio, which is an indicative figure for the property developers’ working capital, fell below 100%. We are expecting a slow recovery for PWON as its inventory account should continue to grow higher in the short term as the company plans to launch few new condominium towers in Surabaya and a new superblock in Bekasi.
Cons: Election year to election year, we may see some similarity between the 2014 and 2019’s quarterly presales split. 1Q14 and 2Q14 contributed 36% to total FY14 presales, while 4Q14 contributed a chunky 36%. If we assume the same quarterly split for 2019 presales target, we may potentially see 4-32% YoY declines in the next three quarters of presales reporting. Note however that the BI issued its first round of tightening regulations at the end of 2013 and this may have an impact to the 1H14 presales. Also there is a difference in the election schedules as the 2014 election was dragged on until late August, while the 2019 contest will be done by end of April.
Recommendation: PWON share price is performing relatively in line with the JCI over the past year, outperforming its property peers. Its solid earnings and cashflow are rewarded with premium valuations against peers. The discount to net asset value (NAV) and price-to-earnings (PE) ratio are close to +1 standard deviation above the 5-yr historical mean. After a solid 45% bounce off recent lows, the stock is no longer cheap. However, with better interest rate environment and positive regulatory tailwinds, we may see improving activities after the election. Furthermore, potential portfolio inflow to high beta stocks and better sentiment towards the property sector should also benefit PWON. We derive an IDR773 target price per share for PWON, assuming discount to NAV, PB, and PE valuation re-rating to +1 standard deviation above mean.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
With our Post Card Series, our aim is to bring on-ground realities & perspectives from cities across India. In this insight, we share our takeaways from our visit to Surat, the diamond hub of India. Our focus is Titan Co Ltd (TTAN IN) and the impact on margins.
Studded jewellery has more margins than plain gold jewellery. Part of Titan’s plan is to improve the mix in favour of studded jewellery which could help it command even higher margins. Titan anticipates this mix to improve to 50% by FY2023. Our interactions indicate a limited possibility of this change in mix. Operating leverage may be the only driver that can help in margin expansion.
We revise our FY20 EBIT margin & EPS estimates. Our FY20 EBIT margin is revised from 12.63% to 11.6% for FY20, continues to be higher than consensus which is at 10.82%. While we see limited margin expansion possibility, revenue growth likely to surprise. We introduce our FY21 EPS estimate at INR 28.75 compared to consensus EPS which is at INR 25.50.
Trust is a factor which cannot be easily replicated or acquired. The trust that Titan enjoys argues for a higher PE multiple. Based on a two-year average forward multiple 51x, our target price for Titan is INR 1466 which represents an upside of 37% from the last close price of INR 1070
Advantest Corporation (6857 JP), based in Japan, manufactures and sells semiconductor testing equipment and electronic measuring systems. The company generates a majority of its revenue outside of Japan, where its products are mostly sold in countries where semiconductor volume production processes are concentrated, including South Korea, Taiwan and China.
The company’s revenues are highly correlated with memory demand and capital expenditure. The current oversupply in the DRAM and NAND memory markets has caused DRAM and NAND prices to decline. This has impacted the capital spending by large memory makers such as Samsung, Micron and SK Hynix.
Advantest has witnessed its revenue and operating profits growing at double digits since the beginning of the current semiconductor cycle. However, with the oversupply, memory price declines and capex halts, we expect the company revenue and profits to deteriorate starting in FY03/2020.
Based on our valuation, we believe Advantest is still overvalued at its current price of JPY2,510 per share. As the memory market has just started decelerating and the current cycle nears its worst, we feel the company share price will decline further with the gloomy outlook for company earnings.
Yokogawa Electric is one of the world’s leading suppliers of distributed control systems (DCS) used in the LNG, oil & gas, petrochemical and other industries. It is particularly strong in LNG, having provided control systems for dozens of liquefaction trains, LNG carriers and re-gasification plants.
Unlike Chiyoda Corporation (6366 JP) and JGC (1963 JP), which depend on a small number of large engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) orders, which can be as large as ¥500 billion, Yokogawa only rarely receives an order as large as ¥10 billion and most of its orders are less than ¥1 billion. It is geared primarily to ongoing investments and operating expenditures in its user industries, less exposed to highly variable orders for large LNG and other engineering projects, and relatively immune to cost overruns and other problems at projects gone wrong.
Margins have expanded over the past several years due to a combination of restructuring and technological advance. Unprofitable non-core businesses have been abandoned or sold, high-wage domestic employees retired, and administration, manufacturing and logistics rationalized. Enterprise and robotic process automation (RPA) software have been introduced and an Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) cloud computing platform is under development. Top-line growth has been slow, but the operating margin has risen from from 5.0% in FY Mar-12 to 8.0% in FY Mar-18, and should reach 10% in FY Mar-21, in our estimation.
At ¥2,215 (Wednesday, March 13 closing price), the shares are selling at 23x our EPS estimate for FY Mar-19 and 20x our estimate for FY Mar-21. Projected EV/EBITDA multiples for the same two years are 9.8x and 8.2x. These and other projected valuation multiples are above their recent historical averages, but indicate upside potential of 20% or more if the anticipated upturn in new LNG investments materializes. Investors willing to take on more speculative risk should look at Chiyoda and JGC.
We visited one big-cap stock, Berli Jucker, and one pip-squeak recent IPO M Vision today. A couple of highlights:
Slow revenue growth at BJC at under 5% largely driven by Big C (hypermarket), but earnings growth was strong at 28% mainly due to lower cost of palm oil in the snack business.
Good progress in Vietnam with expansion of the bottle capacity this year and SABECO increasing purchases of bottles.
Overall unimpressed. The company isn’t expecting to grow revenues more than 9% this year, and many of the cost cuts we saw in 2018 are clearly one-offs. Higher oil prices are likely to lead to rising palm oil prices this year too, since the two commodities are linked through substitution effect.
MVP underwent a bad year on the profit level, but their various businesses, at least on the top line level, looks like it could recover quickly this year.
Best World International (BEST SP) share price has been hammered due to the recent article in Business Times, although the company has addressed them one by one. The annual meeting that recently took place in their office in Singapore shed some light on the seemingly “new but not so new” franchise business model in China. The company also has started to engage Key Opinion Leaders (KOL) aka social media influencers as part of their social selling campaign.
Get Straight to the Source on Smartkarma
Smartkarma supports the world’s leading investors with high-quality, timely, and actionable Insights. Subscribe now for unlimited access, or request a demo below.
